no one is "blaming the victim" here, We are pointing out the flaws ina system, namely the internet. if something goes there, it stays there. if its forbidden fruit, someone will go after it
If I walk to the bad part of town and that I know is the bad part of town and something bad happens to me yes, I am partially to blame because I should have known to avoid that spot (if I knew it was thebad part of town)
the internet as a whole, = the bad part of town, dont do things you dont want public on them
the only wasted votes are non votes, and votes for the lesser of 2 evils, as you are still voting for evil
hell we had this conversation since at least 96 (dont blame me i voted kodos) and people still believe the same stupid bullshit. If everyone who said "a 3rd party vote is a wasted vote" actually voted 3rd party...it wouldnt be a fucking wasted vote!
1, i even pointed out that not all (or even most) muslims want to go out of their way to kill us. all im saying is that if there are groups of people out there detroying property that is not theirs (arguably the worlds at this point) then they should be dealt with swiftly. We dropped the ball on ISIS major here. 1/2 of me says let them kill each other not my problem, but on the other hand with the money and tech they are getting it very well could turn into our problem
I dont know what to do, but im not a military strategist
i just chose 30 as a number but yeah I agree that 30 may be too short for that very reason.
on the other hand im sure software can be written where as for example no one is talking to anyone - delete this section, no one is moving - delete this section, there is no audio being captured - delete thiss ection
In no way perfect and simplified for argument sake, but im sure software could be written to handle it
i think 30 days prior to purging is fair (obviously unless the tape is being used.) Also a lot of tape can get trimmed as there is no need to keep the tape when the officers are not making contact. Still a nightmare, but better than what we have now which is nothing more than he said she said
while correct, anyone who does want to destroy the pyramids, or other historic landmarks should be destroyed first. We understand not all muslims are bad, but we need the good ones to stand with us or get out of the way.
never said there are no consequences, only that you cant legally do anything or criminally do anything against someone who offends you. The sad truth is most americans dont seem to understand the difference between a "right" and a "nice thing to have"
the media would have you believe there are millions of people out there raping women and whatnot, thats the issue with the non stop coverage. Sure there is a problem with a sub culture of a sub culture, but the way the media is ramming it down everyones throats you would think every last women who picks up a controller will be raped by a gamer. its journalistic dishonesty.
true, and sad. I go out of my way not to mod political discussions as I know that I am more likely to be biased. I wish more mods had that much common sense.
im not sure I follow what you are getting at. The amendment is pretty clear, If X is not in the constitution, then it needs to be amended to the constitution to give the rights for the federal government to do X
this has nothing at all to do with what is currently in the constitution, but everything that is not. It in no way says that the constitution cant be amended to allow for the federal government to do X, there is even a proper way to do so (constitutional convention)
To be fair, I was referring to politicians, there are only a few libertarian leaning members of congress pushing for a constitutional convention. You are totally correct though, libertarians are not left or right so much as they are north. I know a little about WOLF PAC, and i like the concept.
Texas was a part of mexico. It wanted its independence. We assisted them in gaining independence. Unfortunately for them, they had so many bills racked up they could not do it alone and joined the USA by necessity, not choice. Not quite apples to apples, but similar enough to make the OP argument somewhat valid
Slashdot Mirror
no one is "blaming the victim" here, We are pointing out the flaws ina system, namely the internet. if something goes there, it stays there. if its forbidden fruit, someone will go after it
If I walk to the bad part of town and that I know is the bad part of town and something bad happens to me yes, I am partially to blame because I should have known to avoid that spot (if I knew it was thebad part of town)
the internet as a whole, = the bad part of town, dont do things you dont want public on them
the only wasted votes are non votes, and votes for the lesser of 2 evils, as you are still voting for evil
hell we had this conversation since at least 96 (dont blame me i voted kodos) and people still believe the same stupid bullshit. If everyone who said "a 3rd party vote is a wasted vote" actually voted 3rd party...it wouldnt be a fucking wasted vote!
hes also a DJ you coward, they are in no way mutually exclusive
yes I know, I was simply making a joke. his work is actually damn good, but the idea of going to watch a dj perform to me is just kind of strange.
on the one hand, we have a guy who wears a mouse head, dances, and hits "play" and gets paid major for using other peoples music
than, there is disney
what side am I supposed to be on here???
well yeah its not perfect, but you wont see the cops enforcing the corruption with the shield any longer
1, i even pointed out that not all (or even most) muslims want to go out of their way to kill us. all im saying is that if there are groups of people out there detroying property that is not theirs (arguably the worlds at this point) then they should be dealt with swiftly. We dropped the ball on ISIS major here. 1/2 of me says let them kill each other not my problem, but on the other hand with the money and tech they are getting it very well could turn into our problem
I dont know what to do, but im not a military strategist
i just chose 30 as a number but yeah I agree that 30 may be too short for that very reason.
on the other hand im sure software can be written where as for example no one is talking to anyone - delete this section, no one is moving - delete this section, there is no audio being captured - delete thiss ection
In no way perfect and simplified for argument sake, but im sure software could be written to handle it
This could also help with corrupt cops, ones on the dole you know? wont be able to try and bribe a cop if hes wearing a camera
i think 30 days prior to purging is fair (obviously unless the tape is being used.) Also a lot of tape can get trimmed as there is no need to keep the tape when the officers are not making contact. Still a nightmare, but better than what we have now which is nothing more than he said she said
no the real shame is that you have no grasp on the actual history of the pyramids.
and how many are sympathetic to ISIS? to me, they are no better than ISIS
while correct, anyone who does want to destroy the pyramids, or other historic landmarks should be destroyed first. We understand not all muslims are bad, but we need the good ones to stand with us or get out of the way.
well the highway is an actual legit use of the interstate commerce clause. that is a legit function
never said there are no consequences, only that you cant legally do anything or criminally do anything against someone who offends you. The sad truth is most americans dont seem to understand the difference between a "right" and a "nice thing to have"
because if people have a right not be be offended, then there is no freedom of speech
the media would have you believe there are millions of people out there raping women and whatnot, thats the issue with the non stop coverage. Sure there is a problem with a sub culture of a sub culture, but the way the media is ramming it down everyones throats you would think every last women who picks up a controller will be raped by a gamer. its journalistic dishonesty.
true, and sad. I go out of my way not to mod political discussions as I know that I am more likely to be biased. I wish more mods had that much common sense.
im not sure I follow what you are getting at. The amendment is pretty clear, If X is not in the constitution, then it needs to be amended to the constitution to give the rights for the federal government to do X
this has nothing at all to do with what is currently in the constitution, but everything that is not. It in no way says that the constitution cant be amended to allow for the federal government to do X, there is even a proper way to do so (constitutional convention)
WOOOSHHHH
hey mods, I disagree != troll
I had no idea wanting to people to read a bill, and congress to read a bill before voting on it is something a troll would say.
im not sure if you meant to reply to me or PP, because we seem to agree here
To be fair, I was referring to politicians, there are only a few libertarian leaning members of congress pushing for a constitutional convention. You are totally correct though, libertarians are not left or right so much as they are north. I know a little about WOLF PAC, and i like the concept.
overly broad? its a single sentence! I dont understand why SO many people have trouble understanding single sentence amendments in america.
Texas was a part of mexico. It wanted its independence. We assisted them in gaining independence. Unfortunately for them, they had so many bills racked up they could not do it alone and joined the USA by necessity, not choice. Not quite apples to apples, but similar enough to make the OP argument somewhat valid