they capture all sorts of wave lengths, believe it or not you can get way more clarity in black and white then you can in color. plus the processing of the color images probably takes longer. we will see color photos at some point
if wiki is being sent alerts to the fact that they are having links removed, all they need to do is create a static page with all the links no longer listed on google. and boom, Streisand effect in action.
Well fist off all you didnt say that, you said pharmaceuticals if I wanna go lawyerspeak on you. Second, context matters to some people, corps are people != (corperations = people) when taken in context. But you knew that
Perhaps the next discussion we should be having is how are people on food stamps and living in section 8 having cable? Im sure some bleeding heart will tell me its a right and im racist for questioning it though....
If I have a rare disease with no "known" cure...give me anything it cant get any worse. Ethical is trying when your odds are "well you are most likely gonna die, we worked on this, might work , might not... but you are dead if we do nothing" giving someone a chance (with consent of the patient of course)
956 on the global scale of some 7 billion or whatever we are at now on the other hand hardly is an outbreak. Thats prob less than die daily in car crashes around the world
Any citation for when romney said pharmaceuticals are people? If you dont have any citation for thar, stfu and make your point and the the bs politics out of it
If a woman says that holding the door for them is the same as rape, thats militant feminism, its more out there than you think, although still a smaller group. Yet for some reason like in everything else, the fringe become the spokesmen...er..spokes people? I dont know whats not offensive anymore
James, You have been on the bottom of the ocean a number of times over your career. We all are aware of the great pacific garbage patch. My question is have you come across any trash on the bottom of the trench? ( My assumption is yes) and if so, what is the strangest thing you have seen down there wondering how it may have got there??
I wonder how they will define "WMD" vs "conventional" weapons. wouldnt a conventional weapon shot from space at the earth have a much higher velocity than the same weapon used on earth?? I just dont see the need to weaponize space
It exclusively limits the use of the Moon and other celestial bodies to peaceful purposes and expressly prohibits their use for testing weapons of any kind, conducting military maneuvers, or establishing military bases, installations, and fortifications (Art.IV). However, the Treaty does not prohibit the placement of conventional weapons in orbit. The treaty also states that the exploration of outer space shall be done to benefit all countries and shall be free for exploration and use by all the States.
The treaty explicitly forbids any government from claiming a celestial resource such as the Moon or a planet, claiming that they are the common heritage of mankind.[3] Art. II of the Treaty states that "outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means". However, the State that launches a space object retains jurisdiction and control over that object.[4] The State is also liable for damages caused by their space object.[5]
there is a difference between feminism, and militant feminism, similar to how there is islam, and extremist islam. Sure the number of militant feminism will be smaller than the entire group, but i was being very specific on who i am speaking about
yet for some reason those are the ones that get all the coverage. Try going to a feminism blog and reading for yourself. I had someone try and equate telling a woman she has nice eyes to rape just earlier today. apparently chivalry is dead, and it was killed by women
Slashdot Mirror
All good point. But you know...doom and gloom gets funding
Well that just sounds too dog gone reasonable for.the american people. Quick! We need to tgrow....30 billion at the problem right now!
they capture all sorts of wave lengths, believe it or not you can get way more clarity in black and white then you can in color. plus the processing of the color images probably takes longer. we will see color photos at some point
you mean the people who wanted this had all the paperwork ready to go and all they had to do was hit "submit" on the day it passed
if wiki is being sent alerts to the fact that they are having links removed, all they need to do is create a static page with all the links no longer listed on google. and boom, Streisand effect in action.
apparently writing PROPER words is difficult as well
Im not saying its not a problem, just the media is causing hysteria for nothing in the grand scheme of thing
Because he never said that?
Even better point I overlooked, thank you
Well fist off all you didnt say that, you said pharmaceuticals if I wanna go lawyerspeak on you. Second, context matters to some people, corps are people != (corperations = people) when taken in context. But you knew that
Just gimme a smoke.... oh wait
Perhaps the next discussion we should be having is how are people on food stamps and living in section 8 having cable? Im sure some bleeding heart will tell me its a right and im racist for questioning it though....
If I have a rare disease with no "known" cure...give me anything it cant get any worse. Ethical is trying when your odds are "well you are most likely gonna die, we worked on this, might work , might not... but you are dead if we do nothing" giving someone a chance (with consent of the patient of course)
956 on the global scale of some 7 billion or whatever we are at now on the other hand hardly is an outbreak. Thats prob less than die daily in car crashes around the world
Any citation for when romney said pharmaceuticals are people? If you dont have any citation for thar, stfu and make your point and the the bs politics out of it
If a woman says that holding the door for them is the same as rape, thats militant feminism, its more out there than you think, although still a smaller group. Yet for some reason like in everything else, the fringe become the spokesmen ...er..spokes people? I dont know whats not offensive anymore
James, You have been on the bottom of the ocean a number of times over your career. We all are aware of the great pacific garbage patch. My question is have you come across any trash on the bottom of the trench? ( My assumption is yes) and if so, what is the strangest thing you have seen down there wondering how it may have got there??
"states" generally refers to other nations in context of the world view
damn tablet double tap.
I wonder how they will define "WMD" vs "conventional" weapons. wouldnt a conventional weapon shot from space at the earth have a much higher velocity than the same weapon used on earth?? I just dont see the need to weaponize space
It exclusively limits the use of the Moon and other celestial bodies to peaceful purposes and expressly prohibits their use for testing weapons of any kind, conducting military maneuvers, or establishing military bases, installations, and fortifications (Art.IV). However, the Treaty does not prohibit the placement of conventional weapons in orbit. The treaty also states that the exploration of outer space shall be done to benefit all countries and shall be free for exploration and use by all the States. The treaty explicitly forbids any government from claiming a celestial resource such as the Moon or a planet, claiming that they are the common heritage of mankind.[3] Art. II of the Treaty states that "outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means". However, the State that launches a space object retains jurisdiction and control over that object.[4] The State is also liable for damages caused by their space object.[5]
I could have sworn that there was a non militarization of space treaty in place
how do YOU know what humans taste like
you are conflating feminism with militant feminism, I was very clear in my argument about who i was talking about
there is a difference between feminism, and militant feminism, similar to how there is islam, and extremist islam. Sure the number of militant feminism will be smaller than the entire group, but i was being very specific on who i am speaking about
yet for some reason those are the ones that get all the coverage. Try going to a feminism blog and reading for yourself. I had someone try and equate telling a woman she has nice eyes to rape just earlier today. apparently chivalry is dead, and it was killed by women