just because you didnt have a problem , doesnt mean other people dont. Remember how stupid the avg person is, then remember that 1/2 the people are stupider than he is.
I was a strong AMD guy from the K6 days up until the phenom days. up to that point I found better bang for my buck with AMD Its only with the haswell processors* that I have made the switch back to intel
* just happened to be the generation I was on when i was ready to upgrade my 1st gen phenom
this has nothing to do with politics and the parent made a good point. If someone is dependant on someone else, who pays when a deadline is missed? Should adobe be paying all the fees that people got charged for not delivering ontime? Should adobe be paying for those who mayhave lost their jobs due to adobes outage?
well in my case, im still just using CS6 - it has everything *I* need for what I do with it, I dont care about the online only model for tools that i NEED at any given time.
If I had a deadline and was unable to access my stuff, is adobe going to pay for it? I doubt it
specials needs children need....special needs. Some people can handle them, some people cannot. If one cannot, then we should get the kids somewhere that they can get their special needs, not mandate that all schools have to accommodate every last special need that may come up
Parents, parents these days just are not involved in their kids lives as much as they were 30-50 years ago. The rise of divorce rates I believe have harmed the children in this level. Of course people should be happy with their SO, but if you have a child, you do whats best for the child
teacher unions, the make it damn near impossible to fire bad teachers and hire good ones. There is no reason that people should be guaranteed a job for life (almost) after a handful of years. If your students are not learning its not always your fault, but teachers unions are just as bad as the UAW, arguably one of the worst unions for america today
and lastly, but most importantly, the department of education. This bureaucracy does NOTHING to help students, and only helps control people by making people jump through hoops to fit some made up criteria. The money for the schools in NY, should stay in NY, not come from cali and alaska tunneled in through the federal government, because anytime the federal government "gives" states money, there are ALWAYS strings attached. (look at highway funding for the reason why all states have a 21 year old drinking age for example) On top of that we have no competition when all the mandates are pushed nationwide. The beauty of this country is that we have 50 states, or 50 different tests ongoing all the time. Sometimes things work, sometimes they dont. When 1 state fails, it can learn from others who dont fail what works best. However if all 50 fail, where do we learn from??
if someone is excelling in public schools, why not give the advanced students an education above what is "equal" more to work with? Meaning we set a benchmark for the public schools, but if people want a better education allow them to do so and see what works
for example in NYC Instead of doing what our mayor in NYC is doing, trying to ban the schools that are doing good, why not send in people to find out why charter school children are doing better, and try and put more of that into the public schools??
just a question, is there hardware out there that is not protected, but can be attacked if someone put in some connectors in their PC? or is this something that was taken into consideration from the start?
there is a process that is to be used, its called amending the consitution. It can be done but our politicians are to lazy today to do things the right way. No the constitution is not suposed to be disregarded after a generation, but it is supposed to be amended
we saw a good use of it the other day actually in nevada when a bunch of people came to aid a man being unfairly targeted by harry reid and the chinese
you DO know that 1- marijuana is not unconstitutional, in fact the declaration is written on paper made from the stuff
Secondly marijuana was not banned by the constitution, in fact the government used a strong arm tactic to go around the constitution. If they did it legally they would have banned it with an amendment as they did alcohol
again, if you would READ the rest of my post i made it perfectly clear that there is a right way and a wrong way to get what you are asking for. I am simply saying do it the right way and stop eroding the constitution
confronting someone is fine, confronting someone for walking behind you and attacking them is not. As soon as trayvon laid a hand on zimmerman, he was within his rights to defend himself by all means necessary
Slashdot Mirror
just because you didnt have a problem , doesnt mean other people dont. Remember how stupid the avg person is, then remember that 1/2 the people are stupider than he is.
up until IE was free, netscape and others charged for their browsers
pretty much this, this is why I stuck with CS6, I dont have deadlines per se, but i dont want to risk it if i get a chance
I was a strong AMD guy from the K6 days up until the phenom days. up to that point I found better bang for my buck with AMD Its only with the haswell processors* that I have made the switch back to intel
* just happened to be the generation I was on when i was ready to upgrade my 1st gen phenom
this has nothing to do with politics and the parent made a good point. If someone is dependant on someone else, who pays when a deadline is missed? Should adobe be paying all the fees that people got charged for not delivering ontime? Should adobe be paying for those who mayhave lost their jobs due to adobes outage?
well in my case, im still just using CS6 - it has everything *I* need for what I do with it, I dont care about the online only model for tools that i NEED at any given time.
If I had a deadline and was unable to access my stuff, is adobe going to pay for it? I doubt it
should it? i dont believe so
quiet racist
the NSA account is still active obviously
specials needs children need... .special needs. Some people can handle them, some people cannot. If one cannot, then we should get the kids somewhere that they can get their special needs, not mandate that all schools have to accommodate every last special need that may come up
if anything, this thread in this post shows how bad the education here really is...
how about we get rid of the unions, AND the bureaucracy?
I blame the decline of education on a few things
Parents, parents these days just are not involved in their kids lives as much as they were 30-50 years ago. The rise of divorce rates I believe have harmed the children in this level. Of course people should be happy with their SO, but if you have a child, you do whats best for the child
teacher unions, the make it damn near impossible to fire bad teachers and hire good ones. There is no reason that people should be guaranteed a job for life (almost) after a handful of years. If your students are not learning its not always your fault, but teachers unions are just as bad as the UAW, arguably one of the worst unions for america today
and lastly, but most importantly, the department of education. This bureaucracy does NOTHING to help students, and only helps control people by making people jump through hoops to fit some made up criteria. The money for the schools in NY, should stay in NY, not come from cali and alaska tunneled in through the federal government, because anytime the federal government "gives" states money, there are ALWAYS strings attached. (look at highway funding for the reason why all states have a 21 year old drinking age for example) On top of that we have no competition when all the mandates are pushed nationwide. The beauty of this country is that we have 50 states, or 50 different tests ongoing all the time. Sometimes things work, sometimes they dont. When 1 state fails, it can learn from others who dont fail what works best. However if all 50 fail, where do we learn from??
if someone is excelling in public schools, why not give the advanced students an education above what is "equal" more to work with? Meaning we set a benchmark for the public schools, but if people want a better education allow them to do so and see what works
for example in NYC
Instead of doing what our mayor in NYC is doing, trying to ban the schools that are doing good, why not send in people to find out why charter school children are doing better, and try and put more of that into the public schools??
first to use? no, first to mandate its use however would be correct (the imac only had USB this is correct, but USB was out before hand)
just a question, is there hardware out there that is not protected, but can be attacked if someone put in some connectors in their PC? or is this something that was taken into consideration from the start?
it sure seems as if the only time there is "competition" is when google threatens to put fiber in a city, anything else the cant be bothered
there is a process that is to be used, its called amending the consitution. It can be done but our politicians are to lazy today to do things the right way. No the constitution is not suposed to be disregarded after a generation, but it is supposed to be amended
we saw a good use of it the other day actually in nevada when a bunch of people came to aid a man being unfairly targeted by harry reid and the chinese
you DO know that 1- marijuana is not unconstitutional, in fact the declaration is written on paper made from the stuff
Secondly marijuana was not banned by the constitution, in fact the government used a strong arm tactic to go around the constitution. If they did it legally they would have banned it with an amendment as they did alcohol
again, if you would READ the rest of my post i made it perfectly clear that there is a right way and a wrong way to get what you are asking for. I am simply saying do it the right way and stop eroding the constitution
well.... as you understand it is incorrect. that may be what that means today, but thats not what it meant 200 years ago
no, not "the gun owners" the people who use guns incorrectly, and no one else
call me heartless but is someone wants to kill themselves, I say let them
confronting someone is fine, confronting someone for walking behind you and attacking them is not. As soon as trayvon laid a hand on zimmerman, he was within his rights to defend himself by all means necessary