Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Revenge: iMessage Might Eat Your Texts If You Switch To Android

redletterdave (2493036) writes "When my best friend upgraded from an iPhone 4S to a Galaxy S4, I texted her hello. Unfortunately, she didn't get that text, nor any of the five I sent in the following three days. My iPhone didn't realize she was now an Android user and sent all my texts via iMessage. It wasn't until she called me about going to brunch that I realized she wasn't getting my text messages. What I thought was just a minor bug is actually a much larger problem. One that, apparently, Apple has no idea how to fix. Apple said the company is aware of the situation, but it's not sure how to solve it. One Apple support person said: 'This is a problem a lot of people are facing. The engineering team is working on it but is apparently clueless as to how to fix it. There are no reliable solutions right now — for some people the standard fixes work immediately; many others are in my boat.'"

415 comments

  1. Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    to return back to the flock to receive your iMessages again.

    1. Re:Fix according to Apple is by jrmcferren · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope, Turn off iMessage on the iDevice before wiping or tossing. Been there, done that.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    2. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Nice little Samsung phone you have there, kid. Shame if your messages to iPhones all get lost."

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:Fix according to Apple is by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if you're tossing it because it completely crapped out on you and, thus, you can't change anything?

    4. Re:Fix according to Apple is by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buy a new iPhone, initialize it to your account, turn off iMessage, and sell the iPhone. Simple! (but insane)

    5. Re:Fix according to Apple is by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Nice little Samsung phone you have there, kid. Shame if your messages to iPhones all get lost."

      Why do I hear this in the voice of Joe Pesci?

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    6. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "Nice little Samsung phone you have there, kid. Shame if your messages to iPhones all get lost."

      Why do I hear this in the voice of Joe Pesci?

      It seems that a made man from Apple had mod points.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    7. Re:Fix according to Apple is by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go to the website and do it there?

      Samsung has a nice right up on how to resolve the problem using any number of methods:

      http://www.samsung.com/us/supp...

      Have you people not heard of Google?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your brain is broken, you should be hearing it in the voice of Dino Vercotti.

    9. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then call up Apple, and they'll fix it for you. I know, I used to do it for people.

      It's not rocket surgery, people!

    10. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Radres · · Score: 1, Informative

      They have a "right up"? Really?

    11. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not rocket surgery, people!

      No, its artificially imposed vendor lock-in.

    12. Re:Fix according to Apple is by bazmail · · Score: 1

      I hear it in the voice of the one armed army surplus store owner from the Simpsons

    13. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2

      Well, this isn't any different that a friend stopping using Google Talk.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    14. Re:Fix according to Apple is by joshuao3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The email Verizon sends an Android upgrader includes a link labeled "Prepare and Activate". The page clearly explains how to deal with this. This ENTIRE ARTICLE is about somebody who didn't RTFM and got bit in the butt.

      http://www.verizonwireless.com/support/how_to_use/cpo_activation.html

      --
      Monitor bandwidth usage on IIS6 in real-time: http://www.waetech.com/services/iisbm/
    15. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, its write up on there websight.

    16. Re:Fix according to Apple is by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder why Apple tech support don't just direct people to that site?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call up Apple and tell them they need to forward your text messages until they fix their shit?

    18. Re:Fix according to Apple is by mjwx · · Score: 0, Troll

      Go to the website and do it there?

      Samsung has a nice right up on how to resolve the problem using any number of methods:

      http://www.samsung.com/us/supp...

      Have you people not heard of Google?

      Apple has no idea how to fix it, but Samsung has several.

      Amazing that. I wonder if Apple will post the same support article in 6-12 months time and sue Samsung for patent infringement.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've probably been watching a lot of Home Alone.

    20. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, I make LOTS of phonetic typos. Often I'll type a word that is even twice as long and more obscure than whatever basic word I screwed up (this isn't loose vs lose which I never encountered until the internet and can't make that error because they "sound" too differnet - it is more like "sew what?" or "know way!"). I can't explain it. When - or if - proofreading, the typo sticks out like a sore thumb and my mind can't comprehend what I was "thinking" when I was "typing". I'm guessing there are different pathways for reading/comprehending versus typing/communicating.

      YMMV. Not valid in AK, HI, and, otherwise, fuck off. Yes, really.

      PS: different poster - this is my first on this thread.

    21. Re:Fix according to Apple is by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      "You've probably been watching a lot of Home Alone."

      Actually, 8 heads in a duffel bag.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    22. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apple tech support has plenty of similar pages on apple's own web page. The whole article is FUD, and it's FUD that I've seen at least 3 times before on slashdot.

    23. Re:Fix according to Apple is by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a feature. :)

    24. Re:Fix according to Apple is by hobarrera · · Score: 0

      You do the real fix: Tell your friends to stop using broken software and quit using iMessage.

    25. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      a little Samsung phone. That's going back a few years.

    26. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of Google and I read the (outdated) Samsung instructions and the Apple instructions. I turned off iMessage and I still had problems with it. I logged into the site that was supposed to let me remove the phone number from iMessage but all it showed was a click-wheel iPod. I went to the Apple store where they suggested anyone with my number saved would need to delete and re-add the contact.

    27. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And pretty much all of their ideas don't work.

      Call AppleCare and they'll take care of it. Despite what the person in the cited article states, there IS a fix. It IS simple and it works.

      Call. They will revoke the iMessage certificate from your phone and within 24 hours you'll be golden. Have your senders update to 7.1 or later to be double-sure of the resolution.

    28. Re:Fix according to Apple is by xystren · · Score: 5, Funny

      Welcome to the Hotel Apple iPhone... You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.

    29. Re:Fix according to Apple is by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 0

      Better yet, strop using iPhones.

      Steve Jobs may not have played well with others, but we expect their equipment to.

    30. Re:Fix according to Apple is by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Nah Harvey Keitel.

    31. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the website and do it there?

      This is Apple people we're talking about, remember? It should "just work".

      Have you people not heard of Google?

      See above.

    32. Re: Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't work for me. Was told by Apple support that I'd need to wait 45 days for their platform to purge my number. Spoke to many apple support people. Wasted many hours. There is a serious problem.

    33. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you people not heard of Google?

      Isn't that some company making INFERIOR COPYCAT PRODUCTS OF THE HOLY IPHONE?

    34. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Great, so you can fix it within 24 hours of finding out that it went wrong, which is likely to be several days too late.

      I'm not seeing this as terribly good.

    35. Re:Fix according to Apple is by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, for all in tents and porpoises it's close enough.

    36. Re:Fix according to Apple is by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Maybe the tech support people are using a secret beta search engine that Apple is developing to replace Google Search.

    37. Re:Fix according to Apple is by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes here it is, http://support.apple.com/kb/TS..., basically deactivate iMessage (as long as you have a iphone) and of course a list of things that don't work. As well as of course contacting Apple Support which is free 'er' as long as "Most Apple products come with 90 days of complimentary phone support and a one-year limited warranty. We recommend that you check your coverage before contacting us." otherwise you have to pay for it sucka, mwah ha ha. So yeah, basically a big ole bag of dicks move by Apple. What should happen, the crap arse iMessage service should be able to recognised when the recipient has not has not received the message and notify the sender accordingly with the option of sending an SMS, not target the ex user with bill from Apple 'EX'-Customer Support.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:Fix according to Apple is by jbolden · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's actually what does happen by default. If iMessage fails to send for any reason and there is an associated phone number an iPhone will use SMS.

    39. Re:Fix according to Apple is by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2

      "Nice fucking huge Samsung phone you have there, kid. Shame if your messages to iPhones all get lost."

      ftfy

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    40. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they use Google Ultron to access it?

    41. Re:Fix according to Apple is by NetNed · · Score: 0

      Because it's the typical "apple is evil and all that use them are lemmings!!!" meme that is propagated throughout the web. Never see many stories on how google sells your info in a heartbeat or how they let government agencies free reign to anything they wanted, but yeah, apple using your info for their own use and marketing is "evil!!!"

    42. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not.

      There are reasons (explained elsewhere on this page) for iDevices to prefer iMessage.
      There is a simple, published procedure to avoid this problem.
      There is a way to fix it after it occurs.

    43. Re: Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Revoking the cert takes a few minutes, and will take effect in 12-24 hours, at most. (And that's assuming you don't just start a new message thread immediately, which will resolve it... immediately.)

    44. Re:Fix according to Apple is by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Sure, except that Google Talk was discontinued a while back. That and the fact that Google Talk didn't double as an SMS messaging application. Which suggests that this isn't anything like a friend stopping using Google Talk.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    45. Re:Fix according to Apple is by jittles · · Score: 1

      Go to the website and do it there?

      Samsung has a nice right up on how to resolve the problem using any number of methods:

      http://www.samsung.com/us/supp...

      Have you people not heard of Google?

      Doesn't work reliably. My sister has gone through the process twice and it still tries to iMessage her. I have a couple other friends experiencing the same issue. The only thing I have seen reliably work is to sign into iMessage on another device (mac included) and disable. Changing the iTunes password and other such tricks seem to be a crap shoot.

    46. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly you dont understand the 2 DIFFERENT situations lol

      stop fapping over Jobs, he's dead man, get over it

    47. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple has their own website, with several ways to disable iMessage. One being dead simple:

      "Sending an SMS text message STOP to 48369"

      Really not a big deal for anyone who's head of Google. (Try it, seriously, type "disable imessage".)

    48. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have your friends switch to Android.

    49. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's playing fast and lose with his words.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    50. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, its write up on there websight.

      Their is no need to be a grammar nazi.

    51. Re:Fix according to Apple is by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
      Turning iMessage off on your old phone isn't much of a fix when the first warning you get that something is wrong is when you are already using your new phone. Especially if your iPhone was lost/broken/stolen.

      And while it's nice that Verizon have a fix, I know that O2 in the UK didn't bother warning my friend when she changed phones.

    52. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why you think this. From what I gather, if you don't turn off iMessage before you change, your number is associated to iMessage on the sending phone. So, senders can't send to you.

      In your case, you are using a mutual network. Changing to Yahoo Messenger is NOT the same thing. Unless you think you still show up on other people GTalk when you aren't using it anymore (as online). I'm pretty sure you don't. Whereas the issue with iMessage is, they don't know you are gone and send there as default.

    53. Re:Fix according to Apple is by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Apple should be a bit more forthcoming on the web site and not direct people to a pay for the pleasure customer service, especially if they have failed to set an associated number.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    54. Re: Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps fat tony

    55. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're certainly his!

    56. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're dyslexic. Congratulations. Dyslexia manifests itself in many different ways, and you just described one of them perfectly.

    57. Re: Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I had to do with a friend, nothing we tried worked, I deleted her and added new contact and it worked

    58. Re: Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly in the UK there have been other similar issues including iPhones trying to send text as MMS to other iPhones where the receiving phone has iMessage turned off. MMS can cost 50p a throw so it can get expensive - especially if you have basically unlimited SMS in your contract.
      iMessage is cool when it works, but it's just another of the less polished bits of recent Apple. Don't even get me started about iPhone 5 batteries and the issues Apple are ignoring/pretending don't exist.

    59. Re:Fix according to Apple is by jbolden · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of articles in mac magazines and websites. Just ask Siri or google directly.

    60. Re: Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their*

    61. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the Hotel Apple iPhone... You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.

      You made my day, well done sir

    62. Re:Fix according to Apple is by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      That makes me wince.

    63. Re:Fix according to Apple is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't be insinuating that there's a massive Fandroid FUD fest going on here at Slashdot, would you? That's unheard of!

  2. Sender should go to android. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly the fix is for the sending party to also switch to android.

    1. Re:Sender should go to android. by robbyb20 · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? Im confused. what side are you on? Im an iPhone user...wait, maybe thats why im confused. nm, carry on.

  3. Auto switches by MidSpeck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My experience is that if an iPhone is unable to send an iMessage (shows as blue), it automatically falls back to text message after 5 minutes (shows as green). After a few of these in a row, it defaults to text message until the iMessage connection can be re-established with the other endpoint. (Of course, this option can be turned off if you prefer to use only iMessages, at which point it's not going to be allowed it to fall back.)

    1. Re:Auto switches by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Single person has annoying but minor problem texting random social contact, assumes huge conspiracy and general incompetenceâ¦

      What I thought was just a minor bug is actually a much larger problem. One that, apparently, Apple has no idea how to fix. Apple said the company is aware of the situation, but it's not sure how to solve it. One Apple support person said: 'This is a problem a lot of people are facing. The engineering team is working on it but is apparently clueless as to how to fix it. There are no reliable solutions right now â" for some people the standard fixes work immediately; many others are in my boat

      Interesting that the "story" - such that it is - contains no links to substantiate such a huge issue. People, what some low-level help desk monkey tells you about "the engineering team" can probably be ignored, and assumed to be something they fall back on when they have no real answer for your isolated edge issue.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re: Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't show you any evidence either but my experience after being given a loan iPhone by my carrier in exchange for my galaxy s3 was that my iPhone owning friends could not message me and it did not fallback sms, this did not correct itself even after many days, by then I had no confidence that the issue would correct itself. Most of the suggested solutions around the net did nothing. The only way I could fix it was to borrow another IPhone, link iMessage to my phone number and then turn it off. It was not as trivial as you would like to think and less technical users would be stuffed.

    3. Re:Auto switches by radarskiy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple acknowledges the problem... but what do they know about Apple products?

    4. Re:Auto switches by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

      For 99% of cases, that's exactly what happens. Unfortunately, there seems to be a bug where in some cases that doesn't happen, and iMessage continues to try routing the SMS to the old iDevice, even though it's no longer valid. The bug was actually reported here back in February (making this story a dupe).

    5. Re:Auto switches by vux984 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interesting that the "story" - such that it is - contains no links to substantiate such a huge issue

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=sms+wont+...

      Single person has annoying but minor problem texting random social contact, assumes huge conspiracy and general incompetenceæ

      Yeah, its a well known and widespread problem. Sending and receiving after switching away from an iphone.

      Everyone I know who has an iphone and switched to an android has encountered it, along with related issues resulting from travelling with an iphone and disabling data temporarily, and so on. Sometimes the incantations apple prescribes to fix it work, sometimes the carrier has to do something to get it working again, and some just refuse to work no matter what they do.

    6. Re:Auto switches by abhi_beckert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Apparently Apple knows less about their own products than I do as an Apple developer. You can't trust a random support employee to know how iMessage works, it's a complicated system.

      It's very simple. If you send an SMS to a number registered as being an iPhone, it will be encrypted for that phone and sent over the internet. If the phone does not decrypt the message and send an acknowledgment within a few minutes, it will be sent as an SMS instead. Repeated delivery failures (2 or 3?) will automatically disable iMessage.

      According to the article, the iMessage is sent and status immediately changes to "delivered". That means he has at least one device registered to receive iMessages at that phone number and it is turned on and received the message. His claim to have logged out of iMessage on all his devices is bullshit. He forgot one.

    7. Re: Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. I know a number of people who faced this same problem.

    8. Re:Auto switches by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      TFA links to a Gizmodo story written by Adam Pash, who used to edit LifeHacker and is a prominent Apple fan. There is also this rather long thread on Apple's forums about it. I don't know why you think it contains "no links to substantiate the issue", it clearly does.

      It doesn't fall back to SMS because the message is "delivered", you just don't get it. It seems to be related to Apple thinking you still have a device capable of receiving iMessages somewhere. Sometimes if people change their phone but still have an iPad they find that all the messages go to the iPad, but in this case it seems that even if you don't have any devices the system thinks you do and accepts the message, even though it isn't delivered.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Auto switches by Thagg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just not true, or at least it wasn't a few months ago. My daughter switched to Android and I couldn't text her until she finally remembered her Apple ID and we could log into their servers and disable her account. We used the Samsung page for guidance, and it worked just fine. But by itself, my phone kept silently failing to send her messages.

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    10. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A duplicate story? Months and months after the fact? It's good to know Slashdot hasn't changed, even with the new UI.

    11. Re:Auto switches by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I've seen it sometimes switch back to iMessage randomly as if it were testing (and sometimes it won't failover). Not quite foolproof.

    12. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a developer who has had the non-pleasure of spending weeks troubleshooting network-related iMessage issues (behing a VPN), I can tell you that iMessage does not gracefully fall back to SMS most of the time, in fact it almost never does (recently at least, they've changed it a few times) in the event of service delivery errors.

      The rule that will get you most often is that if there are still any devices connected with the same Apple ID (like a laptop, or another phone, iPad, whatever), then your messages will never switch to SMS, because Apple doesn't think it's failing-- it's successfully delivering to the __person__ uniquely identified by that Apple ID. iMessage is user-oriented, not device-oriented, and it does not care if it actually sends to the __device__ you asked to send it to. You could consider that a bug since you might correctly assume that a phone number is a device identifier and not a person identifier. I do. But on the other hand, a lot of the cool stuff that iMessage/Facetime can do is because it maps devices onto people, and then contacts people instead of devices. So they're understandably going to be extremely reluctant to fix it.

    13. Re:Auto switches by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I believe that's what happens if the sending phone can't send through iMessage, but it doesn't necessarily address what happens if the receiving phone doesn't receive the message.

      Essentially you can set your iPhone to register your phone number to an iMessage account, which you can think of like an email account. So once you've registered your number, when an iPhone has a data connection, it will send the text message to this "email account" rather than sending it via SMS, even if the receiving iPhone is offline. If the sending iPhone doesn't have a data connection, it will failover to using SMS, but when it sends the message, it can't determine whether the receiving iPhone has a data connection. So even if you turn your phone off, it will send the message to this "email account" in lieu of SMS, and those messages can then be accessed on a Mac or iOS device.

      So I imagine that the problem boils down to this: When you switch to using an iPhone and set up iMessage, you're notifying Apple that they can route your text messages through their "email server" instead of SMS, so they start doing that. When you switch away from using an iPhone, there isn't necessarily anything to notify Apple to stop routing text messages to the "email server", so they keep doing it. You could manually deauthorize iMessage from your phone number, but people might not remember to do that.

      What seems potentially more troubling-- and I don't know if it's happened-- is the prospect that this could happen with an abandoned phone number. So imagine I have an iPhone and my phone number is 301-555-1234. I register that phone number to iMessage, so Apple begins routing text messages from iPhone users to iMessage. I then decide that I don't want a cell phone anymore, so I cancel my service and abandon the phone number. Then someone else gets a new cell phone and they are assigned the phone number 301-555-1234, but their phone is not an iPhone. Is there anything to tell Apple to stop routing that person's text messages to my iMessage account?

    14. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Working for a carrier, this indeed is a issue. No major details are provided. Turning off imessage and ensuring the apple account no longer shows the device registered and then activating a alternate os device does not stop this from happening. From my experience with the problem it appears to be more on the ios devices sending to an existing thread as they are not clearing the imessage thread registration and converting to a sms/mms message. You can try erasing the whole thread and turning off imessage and restarting the thread. This indeed is burden on those who receive messages from many people that they may not be in direct contact with (small businesses)

    15. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where else did she have imessage turned on? Or did you fail to enable the fallback to text messages?

    16. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person with the iPhone has to drop the contact from address book. Remove all references. The add the contact from scratch and text the phone number again. It will go as SMS. At lest that has worked for me.

    17. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the Apple device thinks the message *was* recieved, so it will never fall back to text. This happened to me. So for everyone who thinks there is a simple fix that always works, or that Android Fanboys are making a big deal over nothing, you're wrong. There is a problem. There is no single, simple fix. Some fanboys may be exagerating the issue, but that doesn't change the fact that it's real and a real PITA to those of us that have had it happen.

    18. Re:Auto switches by anethema · · Score: 2

      What he is describing is an optional feature that you have to turn on on your iDevice. Not sure if it is even on by default.

      Check in your Settings>iMessage.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    19. Re:Auto switches by Thagg · · Score: 1

      Hm. Failed to enable. Is this a new feature? Indeed, you can have iMessage send as SMS -- I didn't have that set up. It's in Settings->Messages->Send_as_SMS

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    20. Re:Auto switches by devman · · Score: 1

      All they have to do is set up an SMS service to get out of iMessage. "Text STOP to XXXXXX and Apple will remove the sending number from any iMessage accounts". It is a really god damn easy solution.

    21. Re:Auto switches by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Another solution would be if they stopped tying software services in the cloud to their own hardware, and people access their iMessages with their new Android device.

    22. Re:Auto switches by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Hm. Failed to enable. Is this a new feature?

      I'm pretty sure it's been there since iMessage was first released.

    23. Re:Auto switches by DSchrute · · Score: 1

      Like all the current "solutions" this doesn't always work. There are probably a dozen or so different tricks that will work some of the time, but none of them are 100% I had it happen to me, and I can confirm that having the iPhone user completely remove then re-add my contact info did not help.

    24. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently Apple knows less about their own products than I do as an Apple developer.

      Wrong. Your understanding of iMessage is incorrect, see below.

      If the phone does not decrypt the message and send an acknowledgment within a few minutes, it will be sent as an SMS instead.

      Incorrect. Fallback to SMS works in the case where the message fails to send not if it fails to receive which is why it will not fall back to SMS if the receiver's phone/ipad/laptop is simply switched off.

      According to the article, the iMessage is sent and status immediately changes to "delivered". That means he has at least one device registered to receive iMessages at that phone number and it is turned on and received the message.

      Incorrect again. It means that it has been delivered to the email account associated with the iMessage account.

      His claim to have logged out of iMessage on all his devices is bullshit. He forgot one.

      Incorrect yet again. Even if he turns of iMessage the receiver needs to have done the same thing or else his messages to her will be delivered to the email account associated with her iMessage account.

    25. Re:Auto switches by immaterial · · Score: 1

      It has, and AFAIK it defaults to enabled (mine is on, and I've never messed with it).

    26. Re:Auto switches by robbyb20 · · Score: 1

      So if a message doesnt get delivered to the device, it gets delivered to an email account associated with the device?

      If I turn off all my iDevices and have a friend with an iphone me, since the message doesnt have a device to connect with, it sends to my registered email and i receive it there?

      It would be interesting to try out but i'm highly suspicious.

    27. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have any other iDevices or OS X with "Messages", they _will_ be delivered.

    28. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not experienced in this, but with /. stories being posted, and other stories I have read over Apple's treatment on Apps, or I should dictatorship of Apps, and other policies they've taken, I find it suspicious their calling this a bug.

      Im just saying, with all the questionable policies and tactics, I wouldn't blow this off as just a bug. All tho I have no idea why they wouldn't just come out and admit to doing this, but their not admitting to a lot of policies, which of course they claim are not policies, despite evidence that their implementing certain practices.

    29. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in other words, it just doesn't work/it doesn't just work?

    30. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if a message doesnt get delivered to the device, it gets delivered to an email account associated with the device?

      No it gets delivered to that iMessage account with that email name (that should have said "iMessage account associated with that email name, which is the Apple ID"), you don't even need it to be associated with a device. That is the whole point, that is why you need to turn iMessage off when you no longer have an iDevice. Messages from your contacts that use iPhones will go to your iMessage account because their devices have been notified that you have an iMessage account, if you do not turn iMessage off then those contacts are still under the belief that you are using iMessage so their messages to you are "delivered" to your iMessage account but you cannot actually receive them without an iDevice.

    31. Re:Auto switches by exomondo · · Score: 2

      If you have any other iDevices or OS X with "Messages", they _will_ be delivered.

      You don't need a device you just need an iMessage account and the messages will be delivered there. I send iMessages to friends with wifi ipads or ipods and even if they are switched off or not connected to the internet the message gets delivered and is then picked up from iMessage when they get access.

    32. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean like "Sending an SMS text message STOP to 48369" (from http://support.apple.com/kb/ts5185) ?

    33. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it will not. That number is if Apple is sending you verification texts and they have the wrong #. It has 0 to do with this SMS/iMessage issue.

    34. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple always default to on when it's some feature they're trying to get their users to accept. Apple as every bit as bad as Microsoft and AOL were when it comes to vendor lock-in at the expense of the customer's convenience.

    35. Re:Auto switches by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So if a message doesnt get delivered to the device, it gets delivered to an email account associated with the device?

      No it gets delivered to that iMessage account with that email name (that should have said "iMessage account associated with that email name, which is the Apple ID"), you don't even need it to be associated with a device. That is the whole point, that is why you need to turn iMessage off when you no longer have an iDevice. Messages from your contacts that use iPhones will go to your iMessage account because their devices have been notified that you have an iMessage account, if you do not turn iMessage off then those contacts are still under the belief that you are using iMessage so their messages to you are "delivered" to your iMessage account but you cannot actually receive them without an iDevice.

      A truly excellent system....for apple. So many people I know have had this exact issue. Basically if you know about all this you can get around it, but for those that think they're just sending text messages unaware that apple has hijacked them and when that single iphone is lost/broken you're shit out of luck until you go through an awful lot of messing to be able to receive messages again, it's just ridiculous that these devices are so popular. I swear jobs sold the souls of the everyone at apple and put a soul to the devil clause in the apple t&c for it to take off. The ipod wasn't even that good an mp3 player when it first came out, I don't get it.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    36. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem (I haven't experienced it myself) lies with how the iPhone keeps track.

      When you have iMessage enabled, it keeps track somewhere of trying to prefer iMessage or SMS. If the two people had iPhones before and never used SMS, the iPhone simply does not have a SMS number to fallback to.

      The ideal solution would be for an iMessage client to exist on Android, but we won't see that happening except by a third party. Remember that the predecessor to iMessage on the Desktop was actually AOL instant messenger and it has a problem of blindly accepting all AIM messages sent to the REAL IP address associated with the modem/router. So if you put two logical things together, the iPhone's iMessage is likely blindly listening on the data end for messages from Apple, and sending the messages blindly as well. Things like AIM, Y! and MSN messenger used to send "Hello I'm online" messages, but never "user has disconnected", even Skype has this problem. The only way it knows the users are offline is when a heartbeat message fails.

      Since a heartbeat message can't be sent to mobile devices, the iMessages are stored at Apple while the device is offline, not as SMS. Non-Apple devices, send the SMS message and let the mobile network deliver it, which won't report a fail unless the home switch the device belongs to (associated with the Carrier's NPA-NXX in North America) says no such device exists.

      The reason it can't be resolved by Apple is because the message was ALREADY sent as an iMessage while the target device was off. Apple can't send it as a SMS message after the iMessage fails.

    37. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But apparently this dupe may be necessary if the bug still persists...

    38. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes that's exactly right. The standard / default setup for senders makes this into a non-issue.

    39. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      What problem? Apple products are computers. Computers do what you tell them to do, not what you want them to do.

      Recipient told Apple's servers to associate their phone number will iMessage. They never told Apple's servers to stop doing that, they don't bother to turn that off. Apple's servers are doing what the end user told them to do.

      Sender either changed away from default which is to try iMessage and then fallback to SMS
      -- or --
      Recipient still has a device picking up his iMessages other than his phone

    40. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      How can they be unaware? The default setup is

      messages delivered by iMessage are light blue.
      messages delivered by SMS are green

      All over the place when you configure iCloud it asks what you want associated with iCloud and gives you ways of turning stuff off and on. If you blank a phone then from iCloud you have the ability to disassociate it from your account.

      ___

      Anyway the devices are popular for a simple reason they are good quality. Consistently if you look at rankings the iPhone 5S is in the top 3 in every category: battery life, quality of phone, applications, speed... For someone buying a phone you get an almost best of all worlds with no trade offs. Why shouldn't end users want that?

    41. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      If the two people had iPhones before and never used SMS, the iPhone simply does not have a SMS number to fallback to.

      Of course they do. iMessage is associated with a contact. If the contact has a mobile phone number then iMessage falls back to it.

    42. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      What seems potentially more troubling-- and I don't know if it's happened-- is the prospect that this could happen with an abandoned phone number. So imagine I have an iPhone and my phone number is 301-555-1234. I register that phone number to iMessage, so Apple begins routing text messages from iPhone users to iMessage. I then decide that I don't want a cell phone anymore, so I cancel my service and abandon the phone number. Then someone else gets a new cell phone and they are assigned the phone number 301-555-1234, but their phone is not an iPhone. Is there anything to tell Apple to stop routing that person's text messages to my iMessage account?

      It isn't two way it is one way.

      As sender it isn't your phone number but your unique iCloud ID
      As recipient if the recipient were to associate a phone number with a different iCloud ID it would be associated with a different contact for senders. So it wouldn't matter.
      If the senders are just sending by phone number then it is going to work exactly like the SMS system it will go to the phone number.
         

    43. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Where is Apple's revenue stream from iMessage for Android? They don't charge for iMessage and unlike most messaging vendors they:

      a) Aren't looking to be acquired by a social networking company
      b) Aren't looking for VC capital
      c) Aren't trying to sell games as their primary revenue source

      So why would they provide that service to non customers?

    44. Re:Auto switches by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      How can they be unaware? The default setup is

      messages delivered by iMessage are light blue. messages delivered by SMS are green

      All over the place when you configure iCloud it asks what you want associated with iCloud and gives you ways of turning stuff off and on. If you blank a phone then from iCloud you have the ability to disassociate it from your account.

      ___

      Anyway the devices are popular for a simple reason they are good quality. Consistently if you look at rankings the iPhone 5S is in the top 3 in every category: battery life, quality of phone, applications, speed... For someone buying a phone you get an almost best of all worlds with no trade offs. Why shouldn't end users want that?

      Because you speak with a technical mind. Most of the people I know who have had this problem are women or young or just plain stupid. They mindlessly agree to whatever pops up so they can continue and when they send a text message they expect to send a text message not send a text message that the phone will then lookup the number on its own system and if it finds it send it via a completely different message to 'a device' that person has used, regardless if it has a sim card or not, thereby completely hijacking their message. My wife switched from iphone to galaxy and even though I'd disable imessage on that (because I'm aware of it) we have an old ipad that doesnt hold charge so hadn't been used in months, message from other iphone users where getting delivered to that even though it hadn't been on in months yet she'd logged into the app store on it.

      Some have noticed the different colours but didn't know what the meant and one said they just thought iMessage was just what apple called text message, because, well, they're apple and that's the kind of thing they do. The system works perfectly fine while you and your mates who have iphones stay with them but try and leave apples walled garden and they're going to make problems for you.

      I will fully admit the latest and recent iphones are excellent devices, despite my opinions of apple. The original ipods and first gen iphones were so shit though that there was no decent reason for someone to get one over the competition. My confusion is how they got so popular before they got good.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    45. Re:Auto switches by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      the NSA account is still active obviously

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    46. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 0

      They mindlessly agree to whatever pops up so they can continue and when they send a text message they expect to send a text message not send a text message that the phone will then lookup the number on its own system and if it finds it send it via a completely different message to 'a device' that person has used, regardless if it has a sim card or not, thereby completely hijacking their message.

      You are being a bit unfair here IMHO. The sender asked Apple to default to iMessage if possible and to deliver to whatever device the recipient wanted delivery on. The recipient asked Apple to deliver to a list of devices. Moreover they had to actively type in password and account names to make this happen. This wasn't some EULA. As far as your wife's problem go to support.apple.com and disassociate the old iPad from her account or use findmyphone and do it from there.

      The original ipods and first gen iphones were so shit though that there was no decent reason for someone to get one over the competition. My confusion is how they got so popular before they got good.

      I suspect because you are scrambling the "when". The core of the iPhone (2007) was:
      a) capacitive touchscreen as the primary or sole means of input
      b) animation based interaction
      c) high speed web rendering

      No other device in 2007 had that combination to build their interface. It was so revolutionary that Google instantly did a 180 and shifted their Android product towards using it. RIM moved in that direction.... That wasn't "so shit" it was vastly more advanced than the competition. Now in 2010 it certainly was the case you could get better hardware than Apple but by that point Apple had a huge advantage in application quantity and quality. Apple has consistently had pretty good hardware advantages even in 2010-1 in terms of overall design though various Android phones beat it in various respects.

      As far as the iPod I think Apple's advantage was
      1) Going with hard drive and firewire and the touch wheel interface
      2) iTunes integration

      Most of the .mp3 players were selling just hardware. The total experience was pretty bad. What iTunes integration was a seamless music experience. Person bought their .mp3 player. They stuck a CD in their harddrive, default was to autorip that music to iTunes so it was always available. Next time they plugged in their .mp3 player to charge, default was to autosync so the music was on their .mp3 player. If they liked singles rather than albums then with a couple clicks they could find and buy a single for $.99 that would just be on their .mp3 player.

      Going back to the first year 2001 hardware is what made the difference. Going small hard drive was a big deal.
      CD player = $5 / song
      Flash player = $10 / song
      MP3 CD = $1 / song
      Hard drive = $.30 / song

      Loading 1000 songs onto an harddrive mp3 player over USB was 5 hours. On Apple's firewire interface 10 minutes As for the interface, the interface was what allowed the mp3 player to be easy to use, small and 6.5oz. Yes those were real advantages even then.

    47. Re:Auto switches by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't find your explanation very clear. I understand that if, in this scenario, someone else gets 301-555-1234 and associates that number with their own iMessage account, that the messages will then be routed to their account. Also, if I set up my iMessage account to be associated with a new number, I believe it drops the old one. But what if they don't sign up for iMessage, and I don't get a new cell phone?

      Because it seems to be that for each iMessage account, Apple stores a phone number for the cell phone, and then a set of email addresses. You can then address messages to either the phone number or the email address, and it gets delivered to the recipient. So if Apple isn't notified in any way that the phone number has been changed, wouldn't they keep routing messages to the old account? And then, wouldn't I still be able to receive those messages on my computer or iPad, even though I didn't have that phone number anymore?

    48. Re:Auto switches by jittles · · Score: 1

      My experience is that if an iPhone is unable to send an iMessage (shows as blue), it automatically falls back to text message after 5 minutes (shows as green). After a few of these in a row, it defaults to text message until the iMessage connection can be re-established with the other endpoint. (Of course, this option can be turned off if you prefer to use only iMessages, at which point it's not going to be allowed it to fall back.)

      This is not the case when the person abandons the iPhone. It will just mark the message as "failed to send" or mark the message as delivered without ever trying to send a text. You have to manually long-tap the message and select "send as text" or they will never get the message. I'm not sure what the difference is, but I have a handful of contacts that cannot get iMessage deactivated, even when following the steps listed by Apple or Samsung. The only solution that seems to work 100% of the time is to use iMessage to disable the account. That requires that you have access to an iOS or Mac device.

    49. Re:Auto switches by jittles · · Score: 1

      Apparently Apple knows less about their own products than I do as an Apple developer. You can't trust a random support employee to know how iMessage works, it's a complicated system.

      It's very simple. If you send an SMS to a number registered as being an iPhone, it will be encrypted for that phone and sent over the internet. If the phone does not decrypt the message and send an acknowledgment within a few minutes, it will be sent as an SMS instead. Repeated delivery failures (2 or 3?) will automatically disable iMessage.

      According to the article, the iMessage is sent and status immediately changes to "delivered". That means he has at least one device registered to receive iMessages at that phone number and it is turned on and received the message. His claim to have logged out of iMessage on all his devices is bullshit. He forgot one.

      You sir, have obviously never encountered the problem. The message does one of two things: 1) Gets marked as delivered but is never delivered because the person has no iDevice or 2) Gets marked as undeliverable and is not resent as a text. I have a friend who has been trying to fix this for months and at first her messages disappeared into the abyss. Now they just fail to deliver and I have to manually resend it. She's changed her account password, which is supposed to reset iMessage, and it still doesn't work. Same thing with my sister and a few other people I know. It's a huge pain. Logging into iMessage on an iOS or Mac device and then removing the phone number seems to be the only reliable fix.

      If they wanted this to be fixed reliably, they should require that you log in to iMessage on an interval and then automatically revert to text if your token times out. As it is, you stay an iMessage user to all iPhone users until you disable iMessage.

    50. Re:Auto switches by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Apple's revenue for iMessage for Android would be the same as Google's revenue for Hangouts on iOS. Does everything need to be a direct revenue generator?

    51. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Because it seems to be that for each iMessage account, Apple stores a phone number for the cell phone, and then a set of email addresses

      No that's totally wrong. Let's try this coming from a different angle.

      There are iCloud accounts. iCloud accounts can be associated with an unlimited number of:
      a) iPhones
      b) iPads
      c) iPods
      d) Apple user accounts on Macs

      (a), (b) and (c) are done using device IDs because those devices are single user. Devices of type (a) also have a phone number. Apple maintains a map of phone numbers to device IDs. If you want to sever the link between a phone number and a device ID you need to:

      i) Register a new device with the same phone number
      ii) Break the link explicitly on the device
      iii) Go to Apple's web portal and break that link.

      Because Apple maintains a mapping of phone numbers to devices on an Apple device providing the sender has enabled iMessage when you send to a phone via. a phone number associated with an iCloud account if the recipient has opted to receive iMessages then instead of SMSing the device will send to the associated iCloud account.

      (d) is more complicated and is done as a user service login because the same user might have multiple macs they access and the same device may have multiple users with different iCloud accounts. So here cloud service and device management features are potentially split even for the same physical devices, a mixed setup.

      ___

      The phone number is just an alternative user identifier. If you haven't severed the link and he hasn't established a new link the phone number is still one of the numbers associated with you iCloud account, it is in some sense still your number. Even though because it is also a phone number the sender probably doesn't think of it that way. You do make a good point that the sender is potentially getting a very unexpected behavior where he's sending to a phone number and the message is going to someone else's computer or iPad.

      I guess in the situation where A is an iPhone user who decides to no longer have a phone at all and then gives up his number to B who has a non-iPhone that is pretty bad behavior from the sender's perspective.

    52. Re:Auto switches by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Well, that is actually a really well put together explanation that has shifted my view. I still think the whole iMessage thing is a bit too default in and hard to get out of but I guess that's part and parcel of their walled garden. As for my other point, you've smashed that one. Kudos.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    53. Re:Auto switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, "all" they have to do is to deactivate iMessage. But only after they realize that some SMSs aren't coming through, then make the link that only those sent from iDevices aren't arriving, then research and find out about this iMessage thing that has nothing to do with their Nokia/Blackberry/Sony/etc.

      Also, sending "stop" won't make it stop. They will have to call Apple support, even though they have nothing to do with Apple. Do you REALLY think that's perfectly reasonable?

    54. Re:Auto switches by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Only if it adds something new to the discussion (e.g. the fact that Apple is getting sued over it, which broke as news AFTER this summary was posted), which it doesn't.

    55. Re:Auto switches by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Recipient told Apple's servers to associate their phone number will iMessage.

      No they didn't, they just turned on iMessage for free texting between iPhones, iPads, Macs and iPods. The problem is that they never explain to the user how it works, their "it just works" concept is the problem.

      They never told Apple's servers to stop doing that, they don't bother to turn that off.

      Because they aren't told that it is their phone number that is associated with their iMessage account and that when they turn that on it tells all their iPhone contacts to send messages to their iMessage account instead of SMS directly to the phone.

      Sender either changed away from default which is to try iMessage and then fallback to SMS
      -- or --
      Recipient still has a device picking up his iMessages other than his phone

      The sender does try iMessage, which is then delivered to the receiver's iMessage account. The problem exists because iMessage fails if the user's account has been disabled or the sender cannot reach the iMessage server, not if the receiver doesn't pick up the message which is why you can still send an iMessage to somebody even if their phone is switched off or out of service range (and to iPods or wifi iPads that aren't connected).

    56. Re:Auto switches by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      Hm. Failed to enable. Is this a new feature? Indeed, you can have iMessage send as SMS -- I didn't have that set up. It's in Settings->Messages->Send_as_SMS

      The fallback to SMS is enabled by default. You must have turned it off.

    57. Re:Auto switches by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      Apparently Apple knows less about their own products than I do as an Apple developer.

      Wrong. Your understanding of iMessage is incorrect, see below.

      If the phone does not decrypt the message and send an acknowledgment within a few minutes, it will be sent as an SMS instead.

      Incorrect. Fallback to SMS works in the case where the message fails to send not if it fails to receive which is why it will not fall back to SMS if the receiver's phone/ipad/laptop is simply switched off.

      According to the article, the iMessage is sent and status immediately changes to "delivered". That means he has at least one device registered to receive iMessages at that phone number and it is turned on and received the message.

      Incorrect again. It means that it has been delivered to the email account associated with the iMessage account.

      His claim to have logged out of iMessage on all his devices is bullshit. He forgot one.

      Incorrect yet again. Even if he turns of iMessage the receiver needs to have done the same thing or else his messages to her will be delivered to the email account associated with her iMessage account.

      You're wrong, I know from experience that sending an iMessage to someone outside cell network range causes it to fall back to sending an SMS.

      Also, I had a friend who would constantly receive double messages, because she had poor cell network coverage in her home, phone/sms worked fine but data had huge packet loss. iMesasge couldn't reach her and would fallback to SMS 50% of the time. When she reads the SMS the phone would connect to wifi and she'd receive the iMessage while reading the SMS, hens the regular complaints about double messages.

    58. Re:Auto switches by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      You sir, have obviously never encountered the problem. The message does one of two things: 1) Gets marked as delivered but is never delivered because the person has no iDevice or 2) Gets marked as undeliverable and is not resent as a text. I have a friend who has been trying to fix this for months and at first her messages disappeared into the abyss. Now they just fail to deliver and I have to manually resend it.

      I have encountered the problem, and solved it for friends/family.

      Since I'm an iOS developer, anybody who has any problem with their iPhone asks me how to fix it. And since I'm a tin-foil-hat-toting privacy advocate, I have studied various articles that reverse engineer how iMessage works. I know exactly what "delivered" means —it means some device somewhere decrypted the message. Apple's server cannot decrypt the message as they do not have the private key, so therefore they cannot possibly send a delivery confirmation.

      Go ahead and try it out. Disable wifi and cellular data on an iPhone but leave the non-data cellular connection active, then send an iMessage to it.

      The message will not change to "delivered" unless some other device is registered (and connected to the internet) to receive messages at that phone number. After some minutes, the blue message box on the sending device will change colour to green, signifying an SMS has been sent. Depending how good your cell carrier is, the SMS will be delivered instantly or after a few days (SMS is not a reliable messaging protocol...). This assumes you have not disabled SMS fallback on the sending device, which is the default.

      I just did the test, and it proved my theory. Disconnecting my phone/ipad/mac caused a sending device to fail to show "delivered", and several minutes later my phone received an SMS message.

      The system is overly complicated, mostly as a byproduct of Apple's end-to-end encryption system, which leads to a lot of customer confusion and miss-information when they try to diagnose one of the many things that can go wrong. But I know what I'm talking about, delivered means it was delivered to a device registered receive iMessages at that phone number.

    59. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they never explain to the user how it works, their "it just works" concept is the problem.

      They have tons of documentation about iCloud works aimed at all levels.

      Because they aren't told that it is their phone number that is associated with their iMessage account

      Of course they are. The moment they go into the account they see a phone number associated with it, and moreover when they make changes to iCloud and get notification they see the number listed at part of the iCloud contacts along with emails.

      and that when they turn that on it tells all their iPhone contacts to send messages to their iMessage account instead of SMS directly to the phone.

      Of course they know that! When they turn that on suddenly they are getting messages on iPads, their Mac... That's a core selling point of iCloud that Apple takes over and integrates.

      The sender does try iMessage, which is then delivered to the receiver's iMessage account.

      Which is marked undelivered for the sender until at least one device picks it up and then it is marked delivered. And if they have read receipts on they also know unread.

    60. Re:Auto switches by exomondo · · Score: 1

      They have tons of documentation about iCloud works aimed at all levels.

      Ok then where is the documentation that explains how iMessage works? I couldn't find it - I'm certainly not saying it doesn't exist so if you can point me to it then that would be very helpful.

      Of course they are. The moment they go into the account they see a phone number associated with it, and moreover when they make changes to iCloud and get notification they see the number listed at part of the iCloud contacts along with emails.

      The issue is that it isn't clear that this is associating the phone number with the account for other people, so you changing your phone and you not using iMessage doesn't mean that iMessage won't be used by other people to contact you. Just look at all the confusion in this story by comments of techs and geeks and then imagine how the non-tech crowd reacts.

      Which is marked undelivered for the sender until at least one device picks it up and then it is marked delivered. And if they have read receipts on they also know unread.

      Based on my testing "delivered" means delivered to the server, not to a device. Which also explains why people get iMessages that are delivered by not received. Of course if the documentation is as abundant as you claim then surely something like this would be pretty easy to find.

    61. Re:Auto switches by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Ok then where is the documentation that explains how iMessage works? I couldn't find it - I'm certainly not saying it doesn't exist so if you can point me to it then that would be very helpful.

      Well first off the copy under messages indicates it is a service If you’re a texter, you’ll love Messages on iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Now they all come with iMessage, a service that’s an even better kind of texting. Because it’s free for you and anyone texting over Wi-Fi using an iOS device or Mac with iMessage. And it’s unlimited.* So say as much as you want. (https://www.apple.com/ios/messages)

      For people who want details the "Local and Push Notification Programming Guide" (link may not work: https://developer.apple.com/li... )
      Is excellent. It walks you through bit by bit on messaging structures and how the push gateway works. There are other books on messaging but this would be a good place to start to figure out the basics and what other resources (ex NSNotification Class library reference) that you might need.

      For people who want a less detailed presentation the: Notification Programming Guide for Websites ( https://developer.apple.com/li...)

    62. Re:Auto switches by jittles · · Score: 1

      You sir, have obviously never encountered the problem. The message does one of two things: 1) Gets marked as delivered but is never delivered because the person has no iDevice or 2) Gets marked as undeliverable and is not resent as a text. I have a friend who has been trying to fix this for months and at first her messages disappeared into the abyss. Now they just fail to deliver and I have to manually resend it.

      I have encountered the problem, and solved it for friends/family.

      Since I'm an iOS developer, anybody who has any problem with their iPhone asks me how to fix it. And since I'm a tin-foil-hat-toting privacy advocate, I have studied various articles that reverse engineer how iMessage works. I know exactly what "delivered" means —it means some device somewhere decrypted the message. Apple's server cannot decrypt the message as they do not have the private key, so therefore they cannot possibly send a delivery confirmation.

      Go ahead and try it out. Disable wifi and cellular data on an iPhone but leave the non-data cellular connection active, then send an iMessage to it.

      The message will not change to "delivered" unless some other device is registered (and connected to the internet) to receive messages at that phone number. After some minutes, the blue message box on the sending device will change colour to green, signifying an SMS has been sent. Depending how good your cell carrier is, the SMS will be delivered instantly or after a few days (SMS is not a reliable messaging protocol...). This assumes you have not disabled SMS fallback on the sending device, which is the default.

      I just did the test, and it proved my theory. Disconnecting my phone/ipad/mac caused a sending device to fail to show "delivered", and several minutes later my phone received an SMS message.

      The system is overly complicated, mostly as a byproduct of Apple's end-to-end encryption system, which leads to a lot of customer confusion and miss-information when they try to diagnose one of the many things that can go wrong. But I know what I'm talking about, delivered means it was delivered to a device registered receive iMessages at that phone number.

      What your test fails to cover is the case where there is A) a device that has not connected to iMessage in many months and B) falls into some bug on Apple's side where even changing the iTunes password does not reset the iMessage registration. Go onto the support forums and you will see that there are people that cannot disable iMessage short of calling Apple. Nothing in their support thread works. And in a lot of those cases the iPhones default to iMessage and never fail over to SMS. You have to manually force SMS and then it will switch back to iMessage after some period of not messaging the person.

    63. Re:Auto switches by exomondo · · Score: 1

      And just to be clear none of that actually explains how iMessage works specifically. I mean aside from actually testing it you there is no way to find out that "delivered" means delivered to the server rather than delivered to a device.

    64. Re:Auto switches by sglines · · Score: 1

      If you have an iPhone you need to go to settings -> Messages and turn on "Send as SMS." The comment says, "Send as SMS when "iMessage is unavailable." The default (at least on my phone - ATT) is off.

  4. "No reliable solution" by ericloewe · · Score: 0

    What an idiotic statement. There's a very easy solution. If user has not been available on iMessage for more than reasonable amount of time, no more than a day, fall back to SMS.

    Stupidly easy solution.

    1. Re:"No reliable solution" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why move away from text messages in the first place? Is Apple trying to learn how to embrace-extend-extinguish? Good luck with doing this against texting...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And interestingly, exactly the solution that Apple implement already - if a message fails to send for 5 minutes via iMessage, it falls back to SMS, if several fail to send, it falls back to SMS until the receiving phone re-registers for iMessage.

    3. Re:"No reliable solution" by Ksevio · · Score: 4, Informative

      Text messages cost money on a lot of plans. Data is much cheaper.

    4. Re:"No reliable solution" by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      >Is Apple trying to learn how to embrace-extend-extinguish?

      Pretty much, but iMessage does give Apple people some capabilities that SMS lacks, so it's not all bad. It probably ducks SMS fees too.

    5. Re:"No reliable solution" by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Because in the US text messages are expensive for end users.

      Here in Australia it doesn't make sense because any plan more than $20 a month has basically unlimited texts.

    6. Re:"No reliable solution" by mlts · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What would be a better solution is Apple making it cross platform. This way, no matter what platform one is on, iMessages go through. This would establish iMessage as a standard, and that would be better for Apple on the long term, than only allowing their devices to use it.

    7. Re:"No reliable solution" by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i like that iMessage works across devices, including not just ipad but macs. macs can recieve imessages at any time, not just when an ichat window is open. so it's finally a viable messaging system that is baked into the OS. from my computer I can send messages to any iphone or any other mac. it's actually really powerful.

    8. Re:"No reliable solution" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Text Messages USED to cost money. Now, nobody actually uses TXT, as we no longer have dumb phones. We use Hangouts, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, GoogleVoice, email ....

      Txt was good when all you had was a feature phone.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:"No reliable solution" by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Because in the US text messages are expensive for end users.

      YMMV. Even when roaming internationally, I don't pay anything per US text message, although I do pay for international texts (I think).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    10. Re:"No reliable solution" by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Speed, reliability, features, cost?

      I no longer need to spend an extra $15/month so AT&T can rip me off for text messages.

      I no longer have to wonder if the SMS was actually delivered or if it went into a black hole and AT&T just didn't let me know.

      I don't have to wonder WHEN it gets delivered, I get notified in real time.

      The fact that I can send and receive messages from my Mac, my iPad, my iPhone and they show up the same on all devices regardless of which one is in front of me?

      Its not limited to 140 characters, so sending long messages don't get broken apart and sent in random order?

      Maps - Sending files via SMS? Not happening. MMS? Sure for certain types, which doesn't include whatever format Maps (on OSX or iOS) uses for data exchange.

      You ask these questions because you've never used iMessage.

      SMS and MMS suck, move on. Ideally, we'd all use XMPP but the designers thought extremely verbose XML was a brilliant idea so a 140 character text message consumes 4 or 5k of data, so its kind of shitty on underpowered devices.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:"No reliable solution" by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      So instead of using an alternative to text messages, Apple should use an alternative to text messages?

    12. Re:"No reliable solution" by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      Guess it depends where you are. Here, I haven't had anything other than effectively unlimited-texts plan for years, even on very cheap feature phone plans. In fact I think even some of our old payg sims have an unlimited texts option if we top up enough each month (don't know - they are only now in kids' / emergency spare phones).
      Minutes and data, on the other hand, are always limited (at easy to hit limits) unless you pay a lot more.

    13. Re: "No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you fancy stuff is worthless if you need to send someone a text who is still using an old school phone. And there are lots of them. Millions. SMS isn't going anywhere. And it's reliable. It doesn't need an internet connection which can be flaky in rural areas.

    14. Re:"No reliable solution" by emuls · · Score: 0

      The problem is when they keep their old phone turned on for a few days and it happily receives all of their iMessages until it runs out of batteries. That's what happened to me when a friend got a new phone. I told him to turn his phone off or unregister iMessages. He checked his old phone when he got home and there were the messages I had sent him the previous day.

    15. Re:"No reliable solution" by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Text Messages USED to cost money. Now, nobody actually uses TXT, as we no longer have dumb phones. We use Hangouts, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, GoogleVoice, email ....

      Txt was good when all you had was a feature phone.

      Congrats on living in a major metropolitan area. The other 99% of the world still has to pay for texts.

      I'll never get over peoples myopic view of the world.

    16. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      It's great having iMessage on the OS X desktop. It's a shame you can't get it on Windows, Linux and Android, or it'd pretty much take over. Whatsapp is close, but for some unknown reason they've stopped short of having a desktop app. If they had that they could take over the market. Skype is pretty much there, but don't market themselves as for chat although it's really good for that.

      What's *really* needed though is some standardised way of chatting between platforms. Something like XMPP for the chat layer and Enum for resolving the phone number to a chat address, so that companies/people can hook into a single namespace.

    17. Re:"No reliable solution" by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Apple has never really comprehended that monopoly behavior doesn't really work when you are a minority platform.

    18. Re:"No reliable solution" by vux984 · · Score: 1

      What would be a better solution is Apple making it cross platform. This way, no matter what platform one is on, iMessages go through

      What, and lose the locking. I know several families right now that are stuck on ios because someone in the the family (usually a child or senior parent) uses an ipod touch or ipad that -can't- fall back to SMS; and it often crosses households (grandparents / grandchildren living somewhere else etc... so now the entire family is stuck on ios...)

      Sure one could install a different IM... but imessages appeal is the seamless IM / SMS experience and installing a whole new program just to talk to one person, and that person ALSO has to install it ... its a genuine obstacle in this case.

      And there really isn't a good cross platform IM client that has desktop, ios, android, windows phone, and blackberry support. Hell, even google talk ... er hangouts is ruled out now that there is no proper desktop client.

    19. Re:"No reliable solution" by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      What an idiotic statement. There's a very easy solution. If user has not been available on iMessage for more than reasonable amount of time, no more than a day, fall back to SMS.

      Stupidly easy solution.

      That's how it works. The "reasonable amount of time" is 5 minutes. And any message sent within those 5 minutes will automatically be re-sent as an SMS (which unfortunately means the recipient will receive the message twice... once the iMessage finally arrives).

      And there can't be any bugs, because in order to acknowledge receipt of a message you have to decrypt the message, and the decryption keys cannot be copied off the device the message is being sent to. Part of it is stored in a dedicated corner of silicone, which cannot be read by software.

    20. Re:"No reliable solution" by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Who is this 'nobody'?

      When I was on the way to the airport to pick up my 65 year old father today, he texted me from his iPhone to say they had landed.

      My mother and her Blackberry are the same.

      Just because you may not text does not mean that there aren't plenty of people who do not have enough of an understanding to use alternative services and simply stick with what comes for 'free' and already on the device.

    21. Re:"No reliable solution" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'm amazed Americans still pay for them. In most other countries any sort of contract comes with a few thousand free SMS per month. I pay about $15 for 5000 texts, 300 minutes and "unlimited" data. Includes 4G.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:"No reliable solution" by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      _if we top up enough each month_. Yes, but if you don't, you pay per text.

      Hmm, I can't find the REALLY cheap virginmobile plans at the moment, maybe they don't exist anymore (up until a few years ago when I had one, it was $5/month if you had it auto-top-up every 3 months).. But even now, the lowest $20/month top up plan I see mentions 15 cents/text. While that's really expensive, for someone who just uses it as an emergency phone, it's not really a big deal.

    23. Re:"No reliable solution" by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're impressed by that, you should try IMAP email!

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    24. Re:"No reliable solution" by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      We use an android phone running an sms server to send and receive large volumes of texts. It was cheaper to do that on a $10/month plan than to use bulk sms servers.

      The term of the contract it is on say unlimited texts as long as it is "reasonable" no idea what that number is but 15k per month is apparently reasonable....

    25. Re:"No reliable solution" by msauve · · Score: 1

      Sounds like email with receipts. Except proprietary and more limited. What great innovation will come next?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    26. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are quite confused about the issue, the issue isn't in sending the message successfully, its in receiving the message. If you have a friend who uses an iPhone and you have an iPhone your message will be sent via iMessage. When the friend gets an Android your iPhone still sends via iMessage because imessage is still functioning and accepting imessages for that phone number.

      The only problem is that Apple makes it so easy to opt into using iMessage but they don't make it very easy to opt back out.

    27. Re:"No reliable solution" by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I use MightyText on Android. It sounds a lot like what iMessage aims to be, and it works on any platform that has a web browser. I have iMessage on my macbook, but I have no idea what its good for without an iPhone... Anything?

    28. Re:"No reliable solution" by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      +1 funny, I chuckled. although incorrect. on my phone I could send either a text message or an email, and my recipient could handle a text message or an email. yet in many cases I choose to send text messages. why??? they're simple, they're fast, they're "always on" at the OS level.

    29. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stupidly easy solution is stupid. Not everyone is constantly checking their messages. It's very easy for many people to not touch their phones for longer than one day at a time.

    30. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's only feature creep. It naturally happens to everything unless you aggressively fight against it. Text messages went from a debugging system, to basic and quick messages, to screwing the language for more data density, to sending multiple texts automatically, to including images, having groups, delivery confirmation, etc... Just like HTML was designed for displaying documents in whatever layout the user wanted, it has morphed into a partial and yet full development platform ranging from basic text, unchangeable pixel perfect (as viewed on a small subset of computers) site designs, full applications, full OSes, and 3D renders.

      HTML (and related tech) is turning into the main platform because it's there and very simple (yeah right) whereas developing a standard application is too complex (but now easier than setting up and maintaining a web app). Similarly text messages are turning into emails because text messages are conceptually less formal and easier to create/send (no need to remember email address, no subject line, no hello+goodbye due to length limit, misspellings forgiven, need not grammar, etc...). Yet all those extra email features that make email more conceptually complex are actually useful and are being slowly added in.

    31. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they're "always on" at the OS level."

      So, not only don't you understand the similarity between iMessage and email, you don't understand the difference between an OS and an application.

    32. Re:"No reliable solution" by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      Is this 2002? All the plans by all the companies include unlimited texts, including low-end $30/month plans. I only know one person who pays to text (after reaching a certain amount), this person has stuck with his same phone contract for more than 10 years.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    33. Re:"No reliable solution" by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I have "unlimited" SMS on my plan. But it is only unlimited to the phones on the same network, and with number portability there is no way of knowing whether my friends have switched networks. Certainly for international SMS, I'm not aware of any plan that is truly unlimited.

    34. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens if I am at work, and I have my macbook or iPad on at home? It's fully capable of receiving an iMessage, but it sure as hell isn't the intended recipient when someone sends a text message to my phone number. Do I just have to wait till I get home before I get that text from my wife asking me to pick something up on my way home?

    35. Re:"No reliable solution" by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yes. Instead of using its proprietary alternative to text messages, Apple should federate with other alternatives to text messages.

    36. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of scenario has you sending/receiving 15k SMS per month?

    37. Re:"No reliable solution" by tepples · · Score: 2

      All the plans by all the companies include unlimited texts, including low-end $30/month plans.

      $30 per month is not low-end. Try $20 per 90 days (source: virginmobileusa.com).

    38. Re:"No reliable solution" by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like an implementation of a multiple-protocol IM client, but without a heartbeat ping between client and server for either of the supported protocols (and also with user identifiers that don't distinguish between which protocol the user wants to send the message on).

      On an Android phone, using Hangouts, when I choose a contact that has a gchat name and a mobile phone number attached, I can switch between "SMS" and "Hangouts". Everyone with iMessage will have an Apple ID anyhow, right? Apple could use that for an iMessage username, or have a little combo-box to the side of the message being sent to choose the protocol to use. In addition, if someone unregisters a phone number from their Apple ID (which I'd imagine could be done online?), it would make sense if the system would fall back to standard SMS (or send via SMS to the phone and simultaneously to whichever devices are currently logged into iMessage).

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    39. Re:"No reliable solution" by tepples · · Score: 2

      whereas developing a standard application is too complex (but now easier than setting up and maintaining a web app).

      You can make one web application, or you can make 14 native applications: one each for Windows, Windows RT, OS X, X11/Linux, Android, iOS, Windows Phone, Xbox 360, Xbox One, Wii U, 3DS, PlayStation Vita, PS3, and PS4. By the time you've finished negotiating with the console makers just to become an authorized developer, you could have finished the web app.

    40. Re:"No reliable solution" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Text messages cost money on a lot of plans. Data is much cheaper.

      This isn't really a problem in a lot of countries.

      However it's absolutely no excuse for messing with peoples texts.

      Apple can prioritise their own proprietary messaging method/protocol over the standard one, but if they dont automatically fail back to the standard method when it fails there is a failure or someone leaves the system then Apple have created a problem that Apple needs to fix.

      If Google did this, people would be up in arms over it. Why does Apple get defended?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    41. Re:"No reliable solution" by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Not defending SMS, which is pretty horrible in many ways, but SMS does support delivery receipts. They are very handy for seeing if/when a message is delivered to the recipient's phone.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    42. Re:"No reliable solution" by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Text Messages USED to cost money. Now, nobody actually uses TXT, as we no longer have dumb phones. We use Hangouts, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, GoogleVoice, email ....

      Txt was good when all you had was a feature phone.

      Congrats on living in a major metropolitan area. The other 99% of the world still has to pay for texts.

      I'll never get over peoples myopic view of the world.

      99% of people (particularly people with cell phones) live outside of metropolitan areas? This page claims about half of the worlds people live in a city.

      --

      Enigma

    43. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use google hangouts.

      After installing the hangouts app on my PC I now get messages that popup whenever I turn on my PC.

      I also get the full history of messages across all devices to inifinity of the past.

      Not to mention; on my phone it merges contacts and messages; but doesn't hide from me the fact that I am using SMS when I want to.

      So I can never get hit by the iMessage "offline" bug.

    44. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach them to use Email.
      Problem solved no matter what device they are on.

    45. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No bugs at all! except you have to remind your senders (you know; the people whose phones you don't control) that they have to enable fallback.

      No fallback = message gets blackholed forever.

      Your solution to: "I have to do something special when I move off iPhone" is instead mutated into: "I have to make sure everyone that ever messages me does something special [enable SMS fallback] when I move off iPhone"

      Can you understand how your solution is no better (Actually worse!) than the alternative (ie Apple fixing their fucking system to detect when you haven't used iMessage recently).

    46. Re:"No reliable solution" by schnell · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed Americans still pay for them. In most other countries any sort of contract comes with a few thousand free SMS per month. I pay about $15 for 5000 texts, 300 minutes and "unlimited" data. Includes 4G.

      I'm very curious. What country are you in? What does "4G" mean to you (LTE, HSPA+, WiMAX)? What are the throughput speeds? Is there any cap?

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    47. Re:"No reliable solution" by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Better yet, that new-fangled XMPP thing.

    48. Re:"No reliable solution" by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Hell, even google talk ... er hangouts is ruled out now that there is no proper desktop client.

      Google Talk is just XMPP, so any desktop IM program should support it just fine.

    49. Re:"No reliable solution" by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure Google DOES do this, but it's through Google Voice which interacts with the SMS network more.

    50. Re:"No reliable solution" by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Google Talk is just XMPP, so any desktop IM program should support it just fine.

      That's what I'd heard to but I've been having trouble getting it working lately with 'hangouts'. I recently tried Spark for example (from igniterealtime.org and was unable to get it to connect); although I'd had it working previously with google talk (ie "before" they forced hangouts on everyone.)

    51. Re:"No reliable solution" by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Teach them to use Email.

      Says someone who doesn't know the difference between IM and email.

    52. Re:"No reliable solution" by djrobxx · · Score: 1

      I still have a limited text plan. No plans to upgrade, because the majority of people I "text" have iPhones. If someone with an Android starts getting chatty I switch to GV and continue the conversation.

    53. Re:"No reliable solution" by Cederic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pretty standard for a 14yo girl.

    54. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And there really isn't a good cross platform IM client that has desktop, ios, android, windows phone, and blackberry support.

      What exactly is the problem with Skype? I guess you can discuss if it is "good", and I don't know if it supports blackberry...

    55. Re:"No reliable solution" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's LTE here. There is no cap, although they do throttle torrents.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    56. Re:"No reliable solution" by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      You say it works. You seem to be the only person on the planet for whom it works.

    57. Re:"No reliable solution" by Geeky · · Score: 2

      As of Kitkat, at least on the Nexus 5, hangout is the default SMS application and does this if you're not careful. It can try to start the conversation via a hangout if the contact has a gmail account, which is kind of useless if they don't have an android phone and you want to use SMS as most people do - to contact them *right now* on their phone.

      You have to remember to select their phone number specifically, then it will send an SMS. It will also always reply in kind - get a text it will always reply by text.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    58. Re:"No reliable solution" by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      So instead of a phone number (which is weakly pseudonymous) you have to create five accounts with the hassle of choosing pseudonyms, use real name when necessary or mandatory, manage and create the associated e-mail addresses and passwords?

    59. Re:"No reliable solution" by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Apple's proprietary alternative to text messages allows me to switch a texting conversation to phone or video and by phone I mean PSTN or IP. It also ties into things like messaging during calls. That's a low end Universal Communication system not an alternative to What'sApp. There are no free alternatives. The good alternatives are in the range of $50-400 / user / year.

    60. Re:"No reliable solution" by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Americans mostly don't pay for texts. Most postpay plans now include unlimited texting. Most prepay plans include unlimited texting. Most people who have texting limits still don't come anywhere near the limit and thus are effectively on unlimited texting.

    61. Re:"No reliable solution" by jbolden · · Score: 1

      What's the value to Apple in a cross platform standard? How do you see them monaziting that? The purpose of Apple software is to sell Apple hardware.

    62. Re:"No reliable solution" by jbolden · · Score: 1

      How exactly does it not work? On the desktop Apple has been earning something 85-92% of the hardware profits for about 7 years now. In the phone space they have well over a majority of the handset profits.

    63. Re:"No reliable solution" by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      My wife is on a $15/year prepaid plan! :) Of course everything is PAYG out of that credit, like 12c/SMS, 12c/minute and 5c/MB data. Incoming SMS and calls are free. But she doesn't use it very much. And of course this is not in the USA...

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    64. Re:"No reliable solution" by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's how iMessage works it sends to all devices it can reach. If you don't want that behavior don't register your phone number with iMessage.

      And frankly the sender should know that. If they want to force it to go to your phone that's easy to do via. SMS.

    65. Re:"No reliable solution" by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I still use Kopete to connect to it, though I'm not certain if Kopete has any special handling for it buried in the source code. As far as I know, Pidgin also supports Google Talk.

    66. Re:"No reliable solution" by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Google Talk is 'dead', everything is going to Hangouts, which is not XMPP. Hence, I can't send a file via XMPP to a Hangouts user because their current bridge sucks ass and doesn't support it.

      Try again.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    67. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is clearly a sending issue. ie Apple products fail to send properly. The android phones receive texts from all other phones.

    68. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use it to communicate with other people who have iMessage. This isn't limited to iPhones, but also includes Mac's, iPad and iPod Touches. A few hundred million devices in the hands of potential friends/colleagues/family/etc, give or take.

    69. Re:"No reliable solution" by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Sprint and AT&T both offer unlimited talk&text plans, and they are both nationwide carriers with a majority of their coverage areas lying outside of major metropolitcan areas. I can't speak for Verizon or T-Mobile, but I'd be surprised if they didn't offer such plans.

      That being said, I prefer SMS over IP-based messaging, and everyone I know still uses SMS (not "TXT") or MMS for domestic messaging.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    70. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about one text every 2 minutes for the 16 waking hours of the day. Sounds about right. :P

    71. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should use email

    72. Re:"No reliable solution" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know, already uses alternatives to TXT (SMS/MMS) messaging. Including Facebook, Google Hangouts(Gtalk), Skype and EMAIL. TXT messaging is left over from feature phones and is a hack communication at best. The only people I know that still use TXT messages, are those that used it on Feature Phones. Yeah, I still get TXT messages, but I always feel like it is a poor hack.

      Nothing like a 160 Character limit.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    73. Re:"No reliable solution" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I have six phone numbers. Which one gets txt? Some are shared with others. And you've never accidentally texted the wrong person because you've memorized every phone number you've ever txted perfectly? Have you never heard of a Phone Book application?

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    74. Re:"No reliable solution" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      More information regarding my initial point.

      https://gigaom.com/2013/04/29/...

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    75. Re:"No reliable solution" by phorm · · Score: 1

      Congrats on living in a major metropolitan area. The other 99% of the world still has to pay for texts.

      Eh?
      Canada. While big cities used to be the one ones that had "unlimited" plans, nowadays anywhere in the country offers unlimited calling in-country, unlimited text (for many, in-country, for Virgin Mobile it's to anywhere in the world), 2GB+ of data, etc. About $65-70 (say $60-65USD). Oh, wait, they're in the US too.
      My understanding is that U.S. carrier rates are lower... but yours still ding you for... text messages? Wow, they've been free here for years. And we're talking places with a population of 7k here. Hell, they're available in the town about 1h away that has a population of 700.

      Also free in the parts of Asia I've been to (worldwide text, often enough). Not 100% sure about Europe in general but I believe those are free as well based on people I know in various areas. My German is fairly rusty but I'm pretty sure that Frei-SMS und Frei-MMS follows that.

      New Zealand... Texts included (as well as to Aus)
      Australia... SMS unlimited in-country

      So, by 99% of the the world... I'm guessing you mean with your carrier in USA? Who is being myopic?

    76. Re:"No reliable solution" by Curtman · · Score: 1

      So... Basically nothing that I couldn't already do with Google Hangouts and/or SMS.

      Sounds wonderful. ?

    77. Re:"No reliable solution" by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Which is orthoganal to the issue of Apple trying to behave like an abusive monopoly while being a minority platform. Apple's profits are in spite of their attempts to be an abusive monopoly. Not because of it.

    78. Re:"No reliable solution" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because OBVIOUSLY only the US market matters.

    79. Re:"No reliable solution" by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Sorry, did I post to slashdot.jp by accident?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    80. Re:"No reliable solution" by jbolden · · Score: 1

      How do you know that? What's your evidence?

    81. Re:"No reliable solution" by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      History.

    82. Re:"No reliable solution" by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I am aware of such trends with many a youth, but that does not mean that 'nobody' != 'Everyone I know'.

      As said by myself and others... texting remains an important thing to many a person who may be outside of your circle as well as mine.

      Hell, I demand that anyone sending me a text message reimburse me the 25 cent cost for me to receive it (as I have no texting plan).

    83. Re:"No reliable solution" by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Wow that's fucked up. Why not do a class action lawsuit?
      against the providers that do that sort of thing. A quarter by received message, that's nuts.

  5. iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts5185

    Seems one just needs to deactivate iMessage before getting rid of their device.

    1. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by djdanlib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be awesome if cell phone salespeople would be aware of that and help their customers who are switching platforms.

    2. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by mlts · · Score: 1

      Swap SIM card to an iDevice... switch iMessage off, swap back. Don't forget to make sure your iPads, iPods, and Macs don't have the number checked either.

      Don't ask how I know...

    3. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Help them switch AWAY FROM Apple?

      That's like expecting help from your priest when you tell him you're going to convert to Islam!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by mark-t · · Score: 1

      What if the sim card is irretrievable?

    5. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be awesome if cell phone owners would avail themselves of the incredibly easy-to-use resources that are available to them, rather then bitch and moan. ...but it'll never happen.

    6. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://support.apple.com/kb/ts...

      "If you can't access your iPhone, you no longer have it, or you can't deactivate iMessage after you try the above steps, please contact Apple Support."

      Sheesh.

    7. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by immaterial · · Score: 1

      I have a number of friends who are cellphone salespeople and they're ALWAYS told to push Android phones (and afaik there are no incentives or commissions to push iPhones). iPhones are expensive to carriers, both in what Apple charges the carrier initially and in the long term hit to the network (iPhone users use more data). That's not to say they aren't happy to sell you an iPhone (especially if you're switching from a cheap dumbphone plan), but they are much, much happier to see you switch away from an iPhone to a Samsung or whatever.

    8. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Then you do it with the new sim card you got for your new phone?

    9. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      what happened? did it fall into a port o let

    10. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by DaHat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So I have to borrow someone's Apple device and make a change because Apple is unwilling/unable to offer... say a web based portal to manage this? Or simply not deliver messages to no longer existing devices?

      Wow... I'm rather glad I've never owned an iPhone, I'd hate to live in that sort of world of forced buy in that exists even after you leave it.

    11. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      No, it's actually nothing like that. Not by any stretch of the imagination. I can only assume you're imagining this happening in an Apple store. But it's not. Because Apple doesn't sell Android devices. It's happening at non-denominational cell phone stores and resellers.

    12. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair... it wouldn't necessarily know that the device doesn't exist any more just because it can't connect to it. It might have simply been shut off, for instance.

      But yes... a web-based portal to manage your devices that would allow people to prohibit (or enable) other iPhones trying to use iMessage to send to them in the first place would be ideal.

    13. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I don't want to jump through umpteen hoops for something that Apple should have already worked out with the huge numbers of engineers they have working on their stuff?

    14. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I am in no way defending Apple for their incompetence when screwing with something as simple as text messaging. I was just answering a very simple question.

    15. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Help them switch AWAY FROM Apple?

      That's like expecting help from your priest when you tell him you're going to convert to Islam!

      Some religions require this. You certainly cant leave the Mormon religion without their permission. You can stop practising, but they still consider you a Mormon.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It might have simply been shut off, for instance.

      Then just send a SMS if it's still off the next day.
      What about people who travel and thus don't have internet? Why should they not get any messages anymore? (With my company phone I can receive texts for free in several countries, but I can't even get data service at all in any foreign country).
      The simple truth is that Apple intentionally misdesign iMessage in a way that it will fail to deliver texts in a huge number of circumstances, just because it is cheaper, so for once it's Apple that does the "better cheap than good" thing.

    17. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Actually they do have a portal to manage this: supportprofile.apple.com

    18. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great advice, I'll remember to tell myself that in the past once I perfect my timemachine.

    19. Re:iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So I could join them, then ignore them, and they'll never come show up at my door again?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. FUD. Pure FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, this is stupid.

    I recently switched from iPhone, and had text messages still going to my iPad. A simple google search revealed pages like:
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5450235
    And many other such solutions.

    That requires having or borrowing an iphone or ipad (Basically, go to settings, iMessage, login with you apple id then tell it not to use iMessage for your phone number).

    According to:
    http://www.imore.com/text-issues-switching-iphone-android-heres-fix

    You can call 1-800-MY-APPLE and have them do it.

    1. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The question is why you can't do this via web login. Or why it doesn't check if user hasn't used an iDevice for long enough.

    2. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by vux984 · · Score: 1

      That requires having or borrowing an iphone or ipad (Basically, go to settings, iMessage, login with you apple id then tell it not to use iMessage for your phone number).

      Ok, and what happens when that doesn't work?

      Because while that solves it for most people, it doesn't solve it for everyone. Believe it or not, there is an actual bug somewhere preventing that from "just working" for everyone.

    3. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do it via a web interface: http://supportprofile.apple.com
      Log in with your AppleID and remove the old iPhone from your profile. Done.

    4. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, and what happens when that doesn't work?

      What part of "call 1-800-MY-APPLE and have them do it" wasn't clear?

      Or, you could use any of the literally dozens of easily-googled support pages that come up showing you alternative methods that will work, including deregistering the phone from supportprofile.apple.com using your apple ID.

    5. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you said goes against Apple's line of our products "just work." That was the posters point.

    6. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by gordo3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's similar to the far more annoying issue in the google play store where you can't control you region and sometimes gets region locked to a region you are no longer in. So when I bought my phone and went abroad for a trip, the play store bound itself to that country and when I came back refused to unbind, even going as far to wipe the phone, wipe all address and credit card info in google wallet, and reconnect.

      Instead it took a week of back and forth with google help for them to just change a setting in the background that force bound my phone to the country I wanted. Of course, now that I have moved to a different country, I have another host of issues I'll have to go through this again.

      Both systems have idiotic limitations, for no good reason (and no, limiting which store I bind myself to based on copyright restrictions on a limited portion of the store is foolish, that should be at the app level with a quick IP address location check).

      Oddly, this is one of the best parts of the apple store. I can freely rebind myself to any store I want, regardless of my current IP. I just need a method of payment valid for that country and have no balance in my account.

    7. Re:FUD. Pure FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, what?

      You are blaming Apple because their "just works" solution doesn't "just know not to work when I imagine a scenario where I don't think it should work." Do you know how fucking ridiculous that sounds?

      If you want to turn off the service, there are plenty of easy and readily accessible methods for doing so. That "just works" for anybody with half a brain and a shred of common sense. How your iPhone is expected to read your mind and know it's "no longer wanted" is beyond me.

      "My Honda got great gas mileage, I only spent like $20 a week on gas! But then I bought a Ford, and I get way worse mileage, so I spend $50 a week on gas! You know what - I'm gonna sue Honda!"

  7. Turn Off iMessage before you switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or take your sim and put it back in your iPhone and turn off iMessage. It disconnects your phone number from iMessage.

  8. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen this complaint ever since iMessage was released and I call BS. This is *by design*. If you associate a phone # with your Apple ID, then every time another iOS user opens a message thread to your phone # it's routed to iMessage. You need to un-register your phone # if you want this to stop.

    Consider this scenario:
    1) I activate iMessage on my iPhone, iPad, iPod, & MacBook
    2) As expected, when anyone using the defaults on an iPhone (or other Apple device) sends me a message, it's routed via iMessage and delivered to all 4 of my devices.
    3) I drop by iPhone in the toilet, and replace it with a non-Apple mobile phone
    4) Someone sends me an iMessage to my phone number.
    --> Should this go through (and be delivered to my 3 remaining Apple devices)?
    --> Of should iMessage magically know that I flushed my iPhone down the crapper and reject the request, causing the sending iPhone to send the message via SMS?

    I would argue that the first option is the "correct" option.

    1. Re:BS by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And if you have an iPhone and no other Apple devices? Well, when it can no longer contact that device (or hell, assume all four of your iDevices fall off-deck while you're on a cruise), what should it do, then?

      Sent from a MacBook Pro using Avatron Air Display on an iPad Air as a secondary display.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know.

    3. Re:BS by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If you have other apple devices, sure... but what if that was your only apple device?

    4. Re:BS by praxis · · Score: 1

      I believe you can do it by editing your apple ID support profile on the web.

    5. Re:BS by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      Both of those options are stupid. If someone sends a text to your phone number, and that number is associated with an iMessage account then it should try to send the message via iMessage, and when it doesn't get delivered to your phone - regardless of if it gets delivered to any other devices - it should send a text to the phone number.

    6. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy more obviously.

    7. Re:BS by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That wasn't my point. To be quite honest, these undeliverable messages have to be putting some measurable amount of load on the iMessage servers, on top of causing a usability problem for their users (e.g. the people who still have iPhones and are trying to send messages to their friends who no longer do), so it would be a benefit to Apple to devise a way to handle this.

      Currently, it default behavior is to revert to SMS if a message goes undelivered for 5 minutes, and fall bask to SMS-only after a certain number of timeouts, until it can be confirmed that the recipient has signed back in to iMessage. This is done on the client-side and can be disabled entirely by the user, which is correct behavior on the client side, as it does allow the user to prevent the SMS fallback on their end; the problem comes when a recipient is no longer an iMessage user, regardless of reason.

      A proper solution to this issue would have to be implemented on the server side. One idea that would work is to have the service disable the phone number after, say, 10 or so (just pulling a number out of my ass here, Apple would be able to determine what's appropriate based on their own data, either aggregate or per-user) messages, or a week of non-use (again, Apple would know what was appropriate based on their own data). In cases where the sender has disabled the MSM fallback on the client side, any queued failed messages could be sent via SMS from the server side when the number is disable on the recipient's account. This way, users still (eventually) get their messages and Apple can minimize SMS gateway costs by not sending messages via SMS in response to temporary issues.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:BS by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      but that isn't what everyone wants. I regularly travel internationally and it is damn expensive receiving an SMS in some countries on roaming because apple couldn't just hold it's horses until I connect to wifi. The problem is when you go down these routes you mess things up for other people and make it easier for some, this is why it's a tough engineering problem.

      Granted, you could just change the settings to make iMessage not bind to your cell number and have people with iPhones next your email address (it will show up as messagable last I checked) if you are worried about this.

    9. Re:BS by jbolden · · Score: 1

      SMS messages aren't sent server side at all now, they are sent from the sender's client (phone). Apple doesn't hand off to the telco gateways. IMHO they should, but they don't.

    10. Re:BS by jbolden · · Score: 1

      iMesage is about seamless integration. The sender doesn't get to decide where the recipient gets their message using iMessage If the sender wants to force delivery to the phone then they should be using something like SMS not iMessage to send the message in the 1st place.

    11. Re:BS by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      They do for some things, just not for iMessage. They already have the SMS gateways set up, so it would (or should, at least) be trivial for them to begin using them in this manner for iMessage. Shit, though, even if they redirect those undelivered messages to /dev/null when they deactivate the number, that would be an improvement; the important part is deactivating the number. Oh, and of course passing that information back to users who are trying to send messages to that number via iMessage. I suppose, at that point, the messages could be redirected client-side, as well, regardless of configuration, since that configuration only applies to phone numbers registered and active on iMessage.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  9. ...problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happens to conversation that were previously carried out that way. Delete the conversation and start over. It can still happen if the iMessage account was activated in another iDevice or Mac. The message will be received correctly via iMessage and not via SMS.

  10. Heard of an easy fix by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

    Not sure if this works but the easy fix seems to be that you change your Apple password. Then the iMessage app can't authenticate and dumps your messages back to SMS.

    1. Re:Heard of an easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the Apple support article says that changing the password DOES NOT stop iMessage. I read and followed their instructions to toggle off iMessage and a few weeks later my mother called me asking why I was blocking her messages.

    2. Re:Heard of an easy fix by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      That stops YOU from SENDING messages using iMessage. Does absolutely nothing for anyone sending to you.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  11. Apple Registered Devices by nazrhyn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Going to https://supportprofile.apple.c... and making sure my old phone was removed was what eventually fixed this for me. Just putting the SIM back in and turning off iMessage did not fix it.

    It was a while ago, so it's possible this might not be the exact right location; but, I do know that it was "removing registered devices" that I did. This seems right.

  12. IIRC by rabtech · · Score: 4, Informative

    IIRC this is actually an issue with the sending devices not being aware that the target contact no longer has iMessage enabled.

    It's trickier than it seems because iMessage will route to your Mac, iPad, and iPhone. It doesn't know if you just haven't signed in recently or if you're gone forever. If I read a message on my Mac, it is a successful delivery, even if I tossed my iPhone in a lake and swore off cell phones forever.

    Apple should add a portal to manage this on icloud.com so you can see all your devices and enable/disable them from iMessage. Then the iMessage servers should reply when a device certificate is used that is disabled or deleted, causing the sending device to update its records.

    Remember - Apple acts as a key exchange system but the actual private keys only exist on individual devices; the sending device re-encrypts the message for each recipient.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
    1. Re:IIRC by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0

      This situation smells of BS. By default it routes to SMS when iMessage fails to send to a phone.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:IIRC by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It does that if and only if there are no other iMessage-enabled devices that can read it. One of the things that I enjoy about the feature is that I can use Messages on my laptop if I'm working, and my phone doesn't go bananas either reporting that it got texts or expecting me to deal with a sea of notifications - they're there in the history, but even if my phone is turned off or not on a network (happens a lot on planes that charge per-device for wifi) I can text to/from my laptop and nobody knows any different.

      Figuring out when someone's phone is gone "for good" is a remarkably easy social problem but a very difficult technical one. Making it even easier than it is today for someone to Apple when their phone is gone is the solution, not some terribly complicated heuristics. Of course, that still requires someone to do something, which they'll complain about - but such is life.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    3. Re:IIRC by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't know if you just haven't signed in recently or if you're gone forever.

      here you go. send as a text if no imessage connection has been established for a day. re-send as text if message can't be delivered via imessage for a day.

      this still sucks, because there will be a day where you don't get imessages, but at least they'd come eventually and would be fixed thereafter.

    4. Re:IIRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iMessage works on more than just phones. If might have failed to reach your phone but it didn't fail to reach your iPad, iPod Touch or Mac.

    5. Re:IIRC by imunfair · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't - the person sending you a text has to manually resend it as SMS.

      I would expect it to remember the last successful option and use that, but it doesn't - it tries using iMessage again after it fails. Someone in another comment mentioned it may remember after "a few" failed attempts, but we never tried that many times - ended up just switching back to another Apple phone. This is the intended reaction in my opinion, I can't see any other reason why they would silently hijack your texts without permission.

    6. Re:IIRC by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      This situation smells of BS. By default it routes to SMS when iMessage fails to send to a phone.

      Actually this sounds exactly like a typical Apple problem. There was a time that was not that long ago when you couldn't use anything apple with anything else. It was a totally closed ecosystem. That was completely intentional. They changed, a bit, to get back into the market... and have done well because of that. But they're still pretty much the most closed down, locked in ecosystem there is. I've always found it strange how open source people could support Apple at all. They're the most anti-choice software company out there.

    7. Re: IIRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm this can happen as it occurred when an aquantance switched. As mentioned, it is likely going to happen if a user has another device set to receive messages through the service. The android is obviously not going to work. Clear all devices, and iMessage automatically switches back to texting.

      The larger issue is that iMessage is an optional service that can easily be turned off. I keep it on because even though I have unlimited texting, I like getting messages on my other devices, and the lack of character limit per message, it is not revenge. Just an artifact that android has not hacked the apple product and provide a compatible service.

    8. Re:IIRC by praxis · · Score: 2

      That would work if someone has a iPhone and switch to an Android phone without any other devices as a possible iMessage receiver.

      User S, the sender has an iPhone.
      User R, the receiver had an iPhone but now has an Android phone. He also has an iMac.

      S goes into his iMessage on his iPhone and wants to send R a message. The iMessage app goes out to Apple's servers with R's phone number and gets a reply back saying the iMessage path is preferred. The message goes out over iMessage and receipt is acknowledged (by the iMac). User S is annoyed because there is no UI to force SMS for iMessage-enabled phone numbers and posts a story.

      What user R should do is log into the web portal and remove his iPhone from his support profile if he no longer plans to use it. Then, when S wants to send a message to R's number, the iMessage service will respond "nope, use SMS, we don't recognize that number."

      Of course, one solution to this problem is better education of users by whoever upgrades them from iOS to Android.

    9. Re:IIRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time that was not that long ago when you couldn't use anything apple with anything else

      If by "not that long ago" you mean 20 years ago, yeah.

      If by "totally closed ecosystem" you mean "didn't run Windows apps," yeah.

      If by "still the most closed down, locked in ecosystem there is," you mean "have embraced open standards and more or less single-handedly brought us commercially viable DRM-free audio downloads, a great desktop Unix, and a host of programmer-friendly features," yeah.

      If you truly think Apple is the most "anti-choice software company out there," you're fucking mad, you buffoon.

    10. Re:IIRC by tepples · · Score: 1

      But they're still pretty much the most closed down, locked in ecosystem there is.

      You are referring to Apple iOS, not OS X, correct? But I do know of ecosystems even more closed than Apple iOS, and their names are PlayStation, Xbox, and Nintendo.

    11. Re:IIRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The message goes out over iMessage and receipt is acknowledged (by the iMac).

      For anyone with half a brain the answer is "then don't do that, stupid". You can't tell me that all engineers are so incompetent they can't come up with that solution themselves.

    12. Re:IIRC by jbolden · · Score: 1

      No the sender's phone defaults to SMS when it can't reach iMessage servers. That's different than iMessage routing to SMS when it can't deliver.

  13. So this isn't revenge? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 0

    What is this click bait bullshit title?, /. is supposed to be better than Reddit. This isn't a bug in the traditional software sense. This isn't a "much larger problem" unless you are a mindless drone that can't be bothered to use the settings menu of your pocket sized computer. This is nothing more than your run of the mill user experience fuck up.

    Here is how to fix it: tell your iPhone to send texts to your non iPhone friend via SMS. Bam, done. Delete the contact and re add it or ask Siri to do it for you or whatever, this isn't a big deal at all.

    1. Re:So this isn't revenge? by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      Here is how to fix it: tell your iPhone to send texts to your non iPhone friend via SMS. Bam, done. Delete the contact and re add it or ask Siri to do it for you or whatever, this isn't a big deal at all.

      so you think this is a reasonable user experience? first off knowing which of your contacts use imessage, and then contacting all them and tell them to screw with their phone settings?

      sheesh.

    2. Re:So this isn't revenge? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 0

      so you think this is a reasonable user experience? first off knowing which of your contacts use imessage, and then contacting all them and tell them to screw with their phone settings?

      No, I explicitly said its a user experience fuck up, in the part of the post that you decided not to quote.

      What I said is this isn't a bug nor a "a much larger problem" because there is a straightforward workaround.

      Have you ever changed phone numbers? Mass text to your friends "hey this is my new phone number". Why can't this person mass text their contact list (or send an email) and say "I don't have iMessage, if you use an iPhone change your settings for me".

      sheesh.

    3. Re:So this isn't revenge? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have to do ANYTHING to switch phones.

      I take it you're one of those "Steve Jobs is Jesus!" people?

    4. Re:So this isn't revenge? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 0

      Haha I don't own a single apple device. I'm just saying this isn't the end of the world. It is a fuck up, sure, but it isn't anywhere as bad as antennagate.

      Seriously how do you people deal with getting a new phone number? Do you think the phone manufactures should automatically have all your friends update their contact books with your new number? The iMessage app should fail over to SMS if it thinks the other endpoint is no longer on iMessage, but there is a very obvious work around until they release the patch.

      Send MMS ,Add all contacts
      Dear iPhone owning friend:
      I no longer am one of you. I have forsaken my iPhone, my Siri, my coolness if you will. I now have a [insert phone manufacturer]. You can no longer contact me via iMessage. Please delete my contact and re add it or otherwise inform your iPhone that I cannot be contacted via iMessage. Your phone is currently too stupid to figure it out for itself.

      I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience,
      Former iUser

    5. Re:So this isn't revenge? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      so you think this is a reasonable user experience? first off knowing which of your contacts use imessage

      iMessages are in Blue
      SMS are in Green

      I not only know which contacts use iMessage I know which messages went to them which way.

    6. Re:So this isn't revenge? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is reasonable, because its the way YOU'VE made the choice to get message YOUR messages via iMessage.
      Y
      ou don't need to know what your contacts use because it is YOUR settings that are wrong if you're no longer using an iPhone.

      YOU tell iMessage that YOU want messages to YOUR phone number over iMessage.

      So until you tell iMessage that YOU don't want messages delivered that way anymore, it will do what YOU told it to do.

      The GP post doesn't understand the problem any better than you do.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:So this isn't revenge? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      ... so when you tell Apple that you want your phone number associated with your Apple ID for messages when you setup the phone ... its Apples fault?

      Perhaps if you had bothered to read the text on the screen, you wouldn't have to do anything to switch phones, but during the phone setup process you actively made a decision to associate your phone number with an Apple ID for the purpose of messages.

      How exactly is it magically supposed to understand when you no longer want that to be the case if you don't tell it so? It didn't magically know when you first set it up, you told it, now you think it has to magically know when you change your mind?

      I take it you're one of those morons who talks out his ass about things he doesn't actually understands and pretends he's not a fanboy while calling everyone else one.

      Grow up and get a clue.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:So this isn't revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. I bet you didn't switch your SIM card or synced your contacts through Apple or Google either? They just magically appeared on your new phone?

    9. Re:So this isn't revenge? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      iMessages are in Blue
      SMS are in Green

      how the fuck do i know that from my android phone that i now use?

    10. Re:So this isn't revenge? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      If you are on an Android phone you are the recipient not the sender of messages. The claim was senders wouldn't know.

    11. Re:So this isn't revenge? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      okay, how does the send know i'm not receiving the messages then? neither side knows. sheesh. or is the sender just supposed to figure out for themselves that if someone hasn't responded in X days they should find the workaround online and apply? yep, sounds pretty darn reasonable to me.

      sheesh.

  14. iMessage wasn't a technical fix by headbulb · · Score: 2

    iMessage was a fix to a price issue, a political issue, and a control issue.

    If cell phone companies weren't charging so much for something that should be free Apple would have had less incentive to come up with a solution that worked around them.

    We should have extended sms/mms to include encryption and for it to be free worldwide. Instead we get a bunch of solutions that don't work with one another.

    1. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If cell phone companies weren't charging so much for something that should be free Apple would have had less incentive to come up with a solution that worked around them.

      so you think apple is some savior from on high that is working night and day to save you money?

      apple's interest in routing through imessage is tying users to their services and not generic text messages that are portable across any device.

    2. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. Isn't SMS cheaper than data?
      I know a lot more people with unlimited text than unlimited data.

    3. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple's interest in routing through imessage is tying users to their services and not generic text messages that are portable across any device.
       
      Right, because iMessage can't be disabled at any time or place... I see your point so well.
       
      But... but... but... It'z teh Whall3d GARD3N!!!!onehundredeleven!!!

    4. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they only got a foothold why? /rhetorical

    5. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Right, because iMessage can't be disabled at any time or place... I see your point so well.

      do you have an clue at all about the topic of this discussion? my god.

    6. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      Don't need unlimited data for text as it uses practically nothing. That's why charging for SMS has always been a ripoff; it's practically free for the cell phone companies to provide.

    7. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. So you do understand. Good.

    8. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who is a tech manager for the carrier in the US with the largest number of iphones in service you are mistaken.

      Imessage was a half ass feature to make people feel good about being in the same club.

    9. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      yes, and being a manager at a gigantic out of touch service provider gives you special knowledge into the inner workings of apple?

      Imessage was a half ass feature to make people feel good about being in the same club.

      and bravo on that insightful observation.

    10. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by jbolden · · Score: 1

      iMessage is more than a solution to texting. It is a component in a low end universal communication solution. It is not just a solution to texting.

      I do agree with your point though in the opposite direction. If SMS had been free obviously then SMS would have been a good solution for the messaging component of UC. Moreover if RIM in 2007/8 had sold BBM to carriers as "SMS 2.0" which they were talking about then we would have had a universal worldwide SMS with all sorts of cool features. But that didn't happen.

    11. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by jbolden · · Score: 1

      No it is more than that. Apple's interest is getting their users to be using an Apple based low end Universal Communication system. So groups of friends of collogues: message, video-call, share files, share information like contact cards.... using a low end universal communication system of which iMessage is a crucial component.

      Apple software exists to sell Apple hardware. Lock in isn't really the core of the strategy, the core of the strategy is that most people don't have access to a good UC system socially even if they have one at work.

    12. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      do you have an clue at all about the topic of this discussion?

      Yes, but you clearly don't.

      Do you have any clue that this discussion is borne out of pure ignorance because ... IT CAN be disabled any time, any place, via a simple web page, or any number of other methods, including --- because its apple, a simple phone call to Apple to have THEM turn it off if you're so incompetent that you can't run a simple Google search to get the bunches of different methods for doing so.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    13. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No and no.

      1) SMS use turned out to be much higher that originally anticipated. This means additional capacity had to go to the control channels that carry SMS. This capacity can no-longer be used for other purposes, which means it's cost. (Though admittedly a relatively small one.)

      2) Discussing more and more by SMS implies discussing less and less through phone calls. Letting you SMS for free means not only adding capacity to the control channels for SMS, it also means losing profit on phone calls. Most people tend to call for multiple minutes, even if they have only 1 SMS worth of stuff to discuss.

    14. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      You keep talking about this low end Universal Communication solution. I have no idea what that's supposed to mean, but I find it interesting that you're very specific with your phrasing. I'm surprised to hear that Apple is peddling a low end anything, but is there also some kind of high end Universal Communication solution?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    15. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, free... except for the thousands of base stations they have to put up for you to connect to.

    16. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      It's practically free for Verizon et all to provide SMS texting to existing customers versus having no texting at all.

      /endhandholding

    17. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      you:

      Right, because iMessage can't be disabled at any time or place... I see your point so well.

      there's is absolutely nothing that the user experiencing the problem (the non-iOS user) can do directly to fix the problem. let me know if you have any further questions.

    18. Re:iMessage wasn't a technical fix by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Yes and yes. Text takes a fraction of the time and space that voice does. If you have a conversation over SMS instead of voice, you are SAVING processing and bandwidth costs for the telecoms.

  15. SMS by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

    If only there was a text messaging service that works amongst all phones, even the dumbphones from before the smartphone era. You could send your short message from any phone, and any phone could receive them, irrespective of carrier and country. You could even tie it to the mobile phone number instead of whatever iMessage uses.

    This would solve these problems. I would call this new service SMS, short for Short Message Service.

    Its a novel idea that fixes all these problems. How come Apple's smart and intelligent Engineers couldnt think of this?

    1. Re:SMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, SMS is only for old people. Try to keep up the pace.

    2. Re:SMS by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Because most telcos will quite happily let you email a massive file or carry on a one hour long low-latency roaming voice conversation for less money than they charge to send a few bytes "sometime in the next few seconds," that's why. Also, there's no reliable inexpensive gateway for non-cellular devices to tie into SMSs as there is for both voice calls and massive emails, even though it would be far easier to create one.

      This was never a technology problem, it was a business problem.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  16. ios7 switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this problem a month ago, seems that iOS7 defaults to off for send as SMS if imessage not avail/confirmed. once its turned on and a couple test text messages then it worked just fine and switched over to SMS automatically, its under settings/messages. problem is if the other person doesn't tell you they are now on android then your none the wiser

  17. But then you'll be back to the kind of phone that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And the fix to that is to get an android!

  18. obvious fix by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Here are 2 obvious fixes. 1, don't buy an iPhone in the first place or otherwise you switch as well and 2. can't you delete their number and name as a contact and enter is slightly differently like "john smith 2" with the same # and it won't know it's the same?

  19. Friends don't... by d0n0v6n · · Score: 0, Funny

    Friends don't let friend iMessage.

    1. Re:Friends don't... by ne0n · · Score: 1

      Friends don't let friend iMessage.

      ...but when they do, nothing of value is ever lost.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
  20. iOS: Deactivating iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what if the device is destroyed? Sometimes switching isn't compelled as a matter of choice, but rather lack of choice to say on the same device.

  21. I'm shocked Apple isn't suing them by gelfling · · Score: 1

    For illegally knowing the alphabet that Apple patented years ago.

  22. FelipeV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy looks like a real douche now... Apple Fanboyism at its best.

  23. Dupe by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dupe from a couple of months ago: Apple's Messages Offers Free Texting With a Side of iPhone Lock-In Posted by timothy on Saturday March 01, 2014

    Time to copy all high moderated posts from the older article. Actually, there is no need: given that the purpose of posting this article is to bring the echo chamber rambling that this is why apple suck, simply posting "that's why I don't have an iPhone" is enough for +5 insightful.

    1. Re:Dupe by clay_buster · · Score: 1

      I remembered this other thread as well but couldn't find it with a Slashdot search of "imessage" or "Imessage android". Maybe better slashdot search would help?

    2. Re:Dupe by immaterial · · Score: 1

      Slashdot search does kind of suck, but in fairness the dupe is actually the #3 result when you search for "iMessage".

    3. Re:Dupe by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      That's why I don't have an iPhone.

      Do I win?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  24. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Changing the contact information so that imessage stop thinking it's an iphone on the other side?

  25. Perhaps the friend should have read... by TechieChap · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the friend should have read this story (http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2013/11/28/switching-from-iphone-to-android-switch-off-imessage/), posted back in November last year, describing how to switch from iPhone to Android. That blog post actually points back to a post by Google's Eric Schmidt (https://plus.google.com/+EricSchmidt/posts/JcfVoJhW2Kw). "News" from last year?

  26. This is trivial to fix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a field associated with every phone number in the iOS address book indicating location/type of device. Simply set iMessage to only be used if this field is set to 'iPhone'.

  27. "it just works" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it just works"

  28. apparently, Apple has no idea how to fix.? by arbiter1 · · Score: 0

    "One that, apparently, Apple has no idea how to fix. Apple said the company is aware of the situation, but it's not sure how to solve it" Yea um let me correct that, "We know how to fix it but we don't want to give any benefits to a competing OS cause we are assholes like that"

  29. Typical by StripedCow · · Score: 2

    First they lock you in, then they lock you out...

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  30. group messaging by clay_buster · · Score: 1

    I message gives you "Reply All" and group messaging. Great for group activities.

    1. Re:group messaging by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The default texting app in Android gives you group messaging too. Free replacement text messaging apps like Handcent give you group messaging and Reply All. That isn't really a feature worth going to a propritary protocol for.

    2. Re:group messaging by djrobxx · · Score: 2

      Getting texts on multiple devices (computer especially) is certainly a worthwhile feature. The end-run around ridiculous text fees for those without unlimited plans is also fantastic. I just wish it was more open. I'd like to see an Android and a Windows iMessage client. Making those available would make iMessage more useful, even for Apple's own customers.

    3. Re:group messaging by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No doubt. I only point out that specifically group messaging and Reply All are not features worth going to a propritary protocol for because those two features are available with standard text messaging. The cost of text messaging is a business decision, even less tied to technology than Apple's business decision to be restricted to Apple platforms, so that is a wash. True multi device support is the only argument listed so far that makes a case for going with anything beyond current text messaging.

  31. Don't use iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am actually ok with an "abstract texting" application replacing SMS with another protocol. People just want to "send a text" and don't really care about how it gets there. That's ok, even good. What's not ok is that the other protocol is something nonstandard that no one else is able to (probably even legally allowed to) implement. Why the fuck is this "iMessage" instead of just XMPP/Jabber or something like that? For that: 10 points from House Apple. It's like we're back in the 1990s again, with people emailing MS Word documents to each other, knowing that only one application could read MS Word documents. You know better than that! Your parents knew better than that and your kids probably know better too. Ridiculous.

    iPhone: the phone for the modern Microsoftie. You missed getting fucked, didn't you?

  32. Work around for temporary scenarios by Chewbacon · · Score: 2

    My wife broke her iPhone so she switched back to her old non-iPhone until we could afford a new one. I kept seeing similar issues where my iPhone would insist using iMessage for her number and would hang trying to send a text. Solution was to tap and hold on the message, after hitting send, and select send as text message. It would keep sending as a text for a while but I'd have to eventually "remind" it when it would forget.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  33. solution by csumpi · · Score: 1

    the solution is quite simple. don't fuck with people's text messages, stop rerouting them to imessage or icloud or whatever icrap is the vogue marketing blurb of the moment.

    1. Re:solution by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      SMS is much more expensive than data (though for no good technical reason - it's a traditional way for carriers to fleece users), so it makes sense to use data when possible. But if you don't want to use iMessage, you are not obliged to - it's an opt-in setting.

    2. Re:solution by PPH · · Score: 1

      it's an opt-in setting.

      Yes. But can you opt back out?

      "You can opt-out any time you like,
      But you can never leave!"

      - Hotel Cupertino (apologies to the Eagles)

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:solution by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The people sending these messages have iMessage turned on. They deliberately established an iCloud account and tied their sending phone to it. How is Apple "fucking with people's text messages"? They are fucking with their own text messages.

    4. Re:solution by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes you can opt-out easily. You literally turn off the setting on all Apple devices. Or you go to the support portal on the web and do it there. The problem people are having is they fail to opt out properly before changing phones and then don't bother to go to the support portal and then...

    5. Re:solution by csumpi · · Score: 1

      your daughter also willingly clicked on that craigslist ad and also willingly got into that black car before she was last seen.

    6. Re:solution by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The ability to buy services and goods to meet your needs is what our society's economic structure is based on. The idea that Apple shouldn't offer people a service they ask for because you don't like it isn't remotely similar to someone being killed.

    7. Re:solution by csumpi · · Score: 1

      sure. until you don't get that text message from your daughter, crying for help. text messages are not some freaking candy crushing toys, for some people life and death. so yes, apple better get their shit together and fix their mess.

  34. I've been there by riis138 · · Score: 1

    I'm happy to see others drawing attention to this annoying issue. I ended up switching to Sprint after Verizon and Apple were powerless to help me when I swapped my Iphone for an Android. I tried having my friends with iPhones delete my contact info, add me under a new name, etc. Nothing seemed to work. A quick Google search will show you that many others have had this problem.

    --
    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -Carl Sagan
  35. Horrible liability on Apple's part by revmoo · · Score: 1

    This "bug" almost got my buddy arrested. Apple needs to take this problem seriously before the courts do.

    --
    I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    1. Re:Horrible liability on Apple's part by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Arrested for what?

    2. Re:Horrible liability on Apple's part by PPH · · Score: 1

      Switching to Android from Apple.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Horrible liability on Apple's part by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      ... I'd love to hear the bullshit excuse you have as to why its Apples fault your buddy almost got arrested.

      I'd love to see how the judge/magistrate heard the case as well if it did happen.

      If your buddy had a court issue and didn't confirm the message was delivered himself, your buddy deserves to be in jail for being a fucking moron.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Horrible liability on Apple's part by revmoo · · Score: 1

      No dipshit his girlfriend was texting a person she thought was him. It turned out to be a 12-year old girl and her parents were (understandably) upset about the content of the messages.

      Thanks for jumping to conclusions though.

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
  36. Ah huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...When my best friend upgraded from an iPhone 4S to a Galaxy S4..." - 'upgraded'; that's a matter of perspective...

    1. Re:Ah huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see, specs that the galaxy beats the iphone on...
      Bigger screen,
      weighs less,
      much higher resolution,
      better camera,
      better front facing camera,
      quad core @ 1.9ghz vs dual core at 800mhz
      more memory
      expandable storage
      talk time
      better standby time
      4g
      wireless supports a, b, g, n, and ac

      So yes, in every way shape and form it was an upgrade.
      Go here if you need more details:
      http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-S4,Apple-iPhone-4s/phones/7597,5257

  37. Reason number #12343 by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've used an iPhone and I couldn't give it up fast enough, it's a horrid platform that appears put together by children, this issue just backs that up.

  38. Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call apple care and explain that she no longer has an apple product. This happened to me also. They can flip a switch and make it right.

  39. Vendor lock-in by OneAhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yup, Apple is still the undisputed king of vendor lock-in. More so than Microsoft and Google, I would say (though they're also doing their best).

    1. Re:Vendor lock-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly are Google doing to lock you in? Do tell.

    2. Re:Vendor lock-in by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Well I used to have a GoogleDocs account tied to a business email. A YouTube account tied to a social yahoo email. And a Google email account tied to a blog. Google is making this impossible trying to cross lock me in.

  40. Guarantee of delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought text messaging in general had no guarantee of delivery. So, couldn't one just consider this to be just another non-guaranteed part to the method of delivery? It really should be a seperate service on its own, or at the least have a way to ensure that the other device is no longer alive if you're going to be overiding a default service.

  41. Was a nightmare for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Turned off imessage - nada. had all my friends change me from iphone to mobile in their contacts. nada. updated my apple account credentials - fixed it for some people. still not 100%.

  42. Google Voice by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    ...could be worse.

    Group messages on iPhones are sent as MMS and routinely discarded by Google Voice.

    Receipt is strictly a Google Voice problem, but iPhones decide secretly how to send messages :/

    1. Re:Google Voice by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      MMS has been around for many years. Google really has no excuse to not support receiving it.

      This is entirely Google's fault.

    2. Re:Google Voice by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      You're misrepresenting the problem. Google Voice is not singling out messages sent from IPhones.

      Group messages from any phone are sent as MMS. Google Voice does not support any MMS. It's Google Voice, not 'gMessage'.

      Note: When replying to group messages, IPhones default to 'reply all' and send MMS. Some Android phones default to 'reply' and send SMS, others default to 'reply all' and send MMS.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  43. posting to undo moderation (NT) by LMariachi · · Score: 1

    posting to undo moderation

    1. Re:posting to undo moderation (NT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you accidentally mod the parent +1 Insightful instead of -1 Troll?

  44. Factor of five price difference by tepples · · Score: 1

    Now, nobody actually uses TXT, as we no longer have dumb phones.

    So long as U.S. smartphone service costs 5 times as much as dumbphone service ($35 vs. $7 per month according to virginmobileusa.com), some thrifty people will stick to dumbphones.

  45. Stop Using Vendor-Ldocked Chat Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard to understand why people remain so beholden to vendor-locked apps like iMessage, or (especially) ANYTHING related to the abomination that is SMS. Sure Blackberry took a while to come to jesus on the issue, but since they made BBM entirely platform-agnostic (there are versions available for Android, iOS, BB10 and (soon!) Windows), it's the best messaging application on the planet. BBM is also ENTIRELY free of SMS (which surely the FUCK, MUST. DIE. IN. A. FIRE.) and does not require you to share ANY personal information in order to communicate with someone else (makes it perfect for online dating!). It's secure, it offers every feature that you could ask for (voice/video-over-IP, file attachments of any type (not just pictures!), screen/app sharing, channels, groups, "stickers", etc)... There's not really any technically valid reason to reject it, from people I've spoken-to, it seems like the excuse you always get centers around the usual human reticence to embrace any kind of change, even for the better...

    -AC

  46. This is new? by suprcvic · · Score: 1

    This was happening to me 2 years ago. How is this just now becoming "news"?

  47. First sue infringing competitors into oblivion by tepples · · Score: 1

    It does if you believe that the majority platform is operating in violation of the law. So Apple sues competitors which it believes to infringe its government-granted exclusive rights.

  48. IRC by tepples · · Score: 1

    And there really isn't a good cross platform IM client that has desktop, ios, android, windows phone, and blackberry support.

    Of course there is. It's called Internet Relay Chat.

    1. Re:IRC by vux984 · · Score: 1

      /facepalm

      You know, that might actually work for me here... I can't believe it didn't occur to me to look at IRC.

  49. "Archives for Nerds", not "News"? by s.petry · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is not "new" and should not be a top story. Here is a forum post started June 13, 2013 regarding this same issue. That same article discusses pretty much everything I have seen here, and gives the same fixes. Vodafone has a video posted from August 8th 2013 for how to fix the most common causes of this problem which can be found here.

    Slashdot has had discussion on this same topic, and nope I am not going to google that for people too.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  50. I'm all for hating Apple but calm down by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

    This guy here has posted the answer :
    http://apple.slashdot.org/comm...
    It's been discussed before, it's not the end of the world.

    What _IS_ fucking stupid is Google utterly ruined the SMS application for shitty hangouts _AND_ they still haven't cloned / stolen the functionality of iMessage properly. For goodness sakes, just copy Apple already. The Apple solution is how it should work, attempt IP based message, if it fails revert to SMS //__and make it fucking seamless to the end user__//

    Hangouts is an abortion, honestly as someone who switch to Android 3 years ago now, I'm really getting tired of Google focusing on un-important shit and worrying about uglifying things than improving stuff.

  51. What a horrible misquote. by Shag · · Score: 1

    Just to be clear, "an Apple support person" did not say that. Nor would they. Ever. A tech calling Apple's engineering team clueless about anything? Surely you jest.

    The original writer, Adam Pash, was clearly paraphrasing what the tech "explained" (his word) in his post at http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2014... - and even used bullet points to group the general themes, rather than quotes, to make it abundantly clear it wasn't a direct quote. The tech probably said something like "the engineering team isn't yet sure what the best course of action is," or something similarly honest-yet-noncommittal. Pash decided to simplify that as "clueless."

    Selena Larson on ReadWriteWeb, for her part, changed "explained" to "told" (slight difference there, the latter being more direct, which this wasn't), and then our own redletterdave (or perhaps timothy) managed to change it to a direct quote. What is this, some twenty-first-century game of telephone? And we wonder why people still don't take online news seriously. Sigh.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  52. imessage isnt sms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this news? its like saying "i told my mailman to text my dad the contents of a letter i handed him,but my dad doesnt have a phone". if he would have done his job and sent her the letter it would arrive fine. imessage is gross software that tries to amalgamate everything and avoid sms (kudos, fees can be annoying), but it doesnt do it by saying "john has imessage, but i am sending him an sms, so use sms in this case because he sms'd me", it says "ALL CONTACTS ARE APPLE CONTACTS, no matter how they came in in the first place.". this is a known, documented and super annoying problem for many swappers. go to blackberry, android, linux, i dont know, tizen, windows phone? its always the same. if you have an account with apple and your phone number is on whatever apple calls your profile (icloud? iMAnnoyed?) and you dont disable your devices from that service you do not continue to receive replies to sms's that you had previously sent.

  53. Easy Fix by ironghost · · Score: 1

    I understand why this is difficult, but have found a repeatable (easy-ish) fix.

    On the iPhone (and this sucks, because it's for the people trying to send you a SMS [not you on your new Android device]):
      1) Turn off iMessage (from the Settings)
      2) Go and send a SMS to the phone number of the Android device.
      3) Turn back on iMessage

    -Note: If this doesn't work, before #1; delete the number from the contact and add it back after #1.

    --
    the IronGhost
  54. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    telegram is cross platform and does everything imessage does.

    I'm not sure what their profit model is and who is snooping on your messages however...

  55. Thought it was well known by Torp · · Score: 1

    ... that Apple has no idea how to do online services :)
    While my phone/tablet/laptop are all Apple, because both the hardware and the OS are much better than the competition, I never tried to activate iCloud/iMessage and other stuff like that simply because I knew there would be trouble.
    My contacts are synced with a google account :)

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  56. If your best friend buys an Android... by angularbanjo · · Score: 1

    ... it's time to find a new best friend.

    Love

    Apple.

  57. Does this really need an article? by SirMasterboy · · Score: 1

    Going to https://supportprofile.apple.c... and unregistering your iOS device fixes this like it's designed to.

    How is Apple supposed to know if you are no longer using iMessage if you simply remove your SIM and sell your iOS device without unregistering iMessage otherwise?

  58. FUD works! Who knew? by Urkki · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I've got a spare iPhone available, and I was thinking of giving it a test drive. It's soon time to change phones, and I've never had an iPhone.

    Sounds like I better steer clear of iPhone after all, to avoid nasty surprises. FUD worked! Except sounds like this is actually true, and all these Apple fans saying people with this problem are stupid, that doesn't help here.

    1. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes. You definitely should stay clear of computers that follow your instructions and don't compensate when you fail to inform them that you no longer want them to perform services you told them they should perform until otherwise notified. Definitely don't buy those sorts of computers ever.

    2. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      No what doesn't help here is people too stupid to make a PHONE CALL. But yeah keep believing that you need to text in order to communicate with someone.

    3. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my 2nd issue with Apple. Unless you are an anti-Apple troll, which I kind of hope you are, actually.

      The problem (based on all the other comments here) seems to be, it can sometimes be really hard to notify (or find out how to notify) this particular service to stop doing it's thing... I indeed steer clear of those kind of services.

    4. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      No what doesn't help here is people too stupid to make a PHONE CALL. But yeah keep believing that you need to text in order to communicate with someone.

      Now this has gotta be an anti-Apple troll... If you don't understand the value of reliable, non-intrusive text message communications, then the problem is at your end. I'm not even saying you yourself need to find it valuable, I'm just asking you to understand that many people think that's very very valuable.

    5. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes terribly difficult by default. Setting -> Messages then right at the top iMessage to off. Stay away from programs that demanding.

    6. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Yes terribly difficult by default. Setting -> Messages then right at the top iMessage to off. Stay away from programs that demanding.

      You see, it should do that automatically, if device for example breaks or is wiped. It seems it doesn't, because many people seem to have real problems with it. So, either it's a crappy product/service needing some fixing, or it's a crappy concept if it's unfixable.

      Anyway, I'm pretty sure you're also aware of this and are just trolling, so never mind...

    7. Re:FUD works! Who knew? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      If it is wiped it does do that. If it breaks you are supposed to be under Applecare and you get a new one.

      because many people seem to have real problems with it

      I haven't seen any evidence for that. I've been talking to Apple end users over the last week about this issue, and mostly in some vague non-technical way they get the SMS vs, iMessage distinction. They get that iMessage is like BBM, Lime, WhatsApp... a new style text message. They get the idea that Apple people can use iMessage and for others they have to use something else. They get that iMessage can use old texting like they had on their dumb phones. They certainly get that there is a difference between the new system they have now and the system they had then. They know their friends with dumb phones or Android use the old system. They do notice green vs. blue though interestingly they don't seem to remember which is which (i find that really odd because the blue/IMessage has all sorts of features that green/SMS doesn't support).

      So no they don't seem to have real problems.

      And to be honest I think you are trolling. I find it really odd that all the critics of iMessage in this thread don't know jack about it.

  59. A solution for the dumbfounded Apple engineers by superbowl · · Score: 1

    A button that says "I'm migrating to not-Apple". Siri: Are you sure? Me: Yes. Siri: Please stay with me, I need you. Me. Nope.

  60. not even XMPP by Mirar · · Score: 1

    I have multiple devices, my friends have multiple devices.

    There's no chat that works from multiple devices to multiple devices reliably. Which confuses me.

    Traditional chats only works from one device to another device. There's no server sharing of information.

    XMPP goes to only one device once that device has replied. That means that if the receiver is switching devices (goes from PC to phone to leave the house), messages might be lost and there's no history on the phone.

    Message carbons tries to solve this - I think - but few clients support it, and even when it works, it doesn't solve the lock problem when leaving the house.

    Google Talk is worse, instead of doing a handover to another device it steals the messages and sends you a Google Mail. Yay?

    But this (the topic), I think, is one step worse.

    1. Re:not even XMPP by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I pretty much use email. It's virtually instant, arrives on all of my devices simultaneously, and flexible enough to handle longer messages with attachments when the need arises. SMS is handy for communicating with dumbphone users, but otherwise email is the answer.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  61. Can't believe simple text over the net is broken by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling we should revert to one of the original standards, in the spirit of Bitcoin (it pays to be first). Therefore the options are ICQ, or a MIRC variant. Jabber is obviously a good modern choice if ICQ isn't used. Why ICQ? Because it let's you send messages when the user is offline and they receive them when the user comes online. P2P would be a viable alternative too!

  62. Google solved this already in Hangouts... by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

    The latest version of Google Hangouts already solved this issue.

    Next to the area that lets you enter text for your message is an icon that can be tapped to select whether or not you want to message to be sent via Hangouts or SMS. The problem here is that Apple are treating iMessage as being synonymous with SMS, something which is not actually the case in reality.

    This change to Hangouts instantly made it more usable as an SMS application for me (All it's missing now is message search)

    1. Re:Google solved this already in Hangouts... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the way hangouts is on Android is just a shitty, incomplete reimplementation of what iMessage is on iOS right? Read the rest of the comments in this thread fanboy, you'll find not everyone things its so awesome.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Google solved this already in Hangouts... by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Way to jump to conclusions. I'm not exactly a fan-boy of Hangouts. All the options on Android are pretty irritating in my experience. Lately I've been using Hangouts just because I got sick of the LnF of the other messaging apps I've used.

  63. Apple a isolationist company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its been clear for a long time that Apple only cares about its ecosystem and rarely concerns itself beyond the Apple walled garden of compatibility. Only a few times such as with iTunes and Safari has Apple even attempted to make its products work in a foreign OS or device. Mostly because they saw opportunity for profit and a need to widen its product appeal. Most who live outside Apple's walled garden understand even if you like Apple products, you must realize that unless you have a exclusive group of friends and business associates who also embrace a Apple ecosystem. That you will almost certainly come up against the limitations of Apple products in the "real" world. Mainly their cloud services suffer from lack of willingness to address that not everyone wants to live in a Apple world or in fact can.
    As much as I am impressed with Apple's mobile services, I am dismayed at its lack of thought of compatibility outside of Apple. The lack of openness is going to hurt Apple as many people begin to adopt technology of different forms and with different operating systems. Right now, Apple does not even try to make their system work well outside of Apple. So I guess choose your friends wisely and make sure they embrace Apple fully.

  64. here is the fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    //May need to tweak date
    if((dateSInceRecipentLastSeenOniMessage - DateTime.Now).days > 1)
    {

                iMessage.dispacthMessageViaSMS(message);
    }else
    {

                    iMessage.dispacthMessageViaINET(message);
    }

  65. Possible fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had the same issue when my wife switched to a windows phone, our solution was to go into ALL apple devices attached to her account and turn off iMessage, took a little while for the system to realize the devices were gone and start sending texts, and the odd part was that it was faster for some people then others, where the others took a couple of days.

  66. This again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else getting a sense of deja vu here? It feels like we've been here a handful of times already and it's been done to death. Please, write articles about things people care about...

  67. AT&T Helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched and AT&T directed me to the site to disable imessage at the time I deactivated the iPhone and activated my Moto X. It seemed standard as part of their process.

  68. Umm...hangouts people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hangouts is googles version of iMessage...I use it on my iPhone to chat with all my android peeps. Almost started using it more often than imessage;-)

  69. This is such old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been known for a very long time. Too bad more people aren't aware. I find the best solution is to never use an iPhone in the first place. :)

  70. You no longer exist by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    Let me get this right.
    Your friend stops using iMessage.
    You send her a message with iMessage.
    You weirdly expect her to magically get the message despite the fact that she is no longer using that service?
    Riiight...

    Maybe you need to fall back to old technology like her phone, email or your two feet.

  71. Please don't call it "SMS!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there was a text messaging service that works amongst all phones

    Hold it right there: we already need to change the requirements. (When did you write this text that you're pasting, 1996?) People want one that works on all computers and networks, not just handhelds on a particularly special version of a wireless network. If you recall, there used to be something called SMS, and everybody totally hated it and vowed to replace it with something usable, ASAP.

    even the dumbphones from before the smartphone era.

    Actually, that requirement can probably be sacrificed, but if those can be included too, ok. I agree with you that "more is better."

    You could even tie it to the mobile phone number instead of whatever iMessage uses.

    I would never suggest iMessage because it's proprietary and therefore hardly anything works with it, so I don't know (and can't know, probably even by law) anything about it, but we've got a mistake here too. You definitely, for sure, absolutely DO NOT want whatever addressing system you use, to be tied to some kind of "mobile phone number." Most computers don't even have mobile phone numbers, and they're hard to create and get. It's not like you can just ask the nearest DHCPd for a phone number, and it's even harder to have multiple computers share this address so that you can read your messages everywhere.

    I would call this new service SMS, short for Short Message Service.

    Eww. Overall in very general terms, I sort of like where you have been going with this idea, but for fuck's sake, please please PLEASE don't call it that. Those words are already associated with a sort of similar application that is already known failure, where pretty much 100% of the American population totally hates it to death and wishes pain and suffering on anyone who sucks them back into that shithole. That's like calling your new car model "Pinto," or your new video interoperability-guarantee standard that open source players are allowed to implement "DVDCSS", or your new windowing system "Windows." Please, keep working on the name. If you want people to use it, then the public needs to know it doesn't suck nearly as bad as the classical "SMS" thing that people used a decade ago.

    How come Apple's smart and intelligent Engineers couldnt think of this?

    Because they're not trying to solve problems for users; they're trying to solve problems for the company. No person should ever use an Apple mobile product, but if you sell Apple mobile products then it makes sense to try to trick as many users as possible, into getting locked into your protocols. This is a zero sum game, so users must lose if Apple is to win. Working against the interests of the users is what you should expect Apple's smart and intelligent engineers to do. That users are hating the consequences of using a weird protocol, suggests the engineers were successful in demonstrating their intelligence.

  72. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like that iMessage works across devices, including not just ipad but macs. macs can recieve imessages at any time, not just when an ichat window is open. so it's finally a viable messaging system that is baked into the OS. from my computer I can send messages to any iphone or any other mac. it's actually really powerful.

    Yap as long as you stay in the brotherhood all is well.

  73. Nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not new at all. I had the exact same problem years ago.

  74. A simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see: tele-phone, def, to speak at a distance.

    Maybe you could use your xPhones and make a call and *TALK* to someone, rather than being so completely terrified of other human beings.....

                        mark

    PS: the content of the one and only text message I ever sent: girl, I'm not your boyfriend. You've got the wrong phone #

  75. Not the only down side to iMessage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another issue with iMessage is if you have unlimited text, but limited data. Turning off iMessage has similar down sides where messages vanish into the void or go to other devices. iMessage should have more controls for cellular data like only loading images/videos if you click on them. Same for iCloud.

  76. Slashdot's Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story doesn't show up on the mobile site.

  77. Learn how to text with an iPhone by curtwelch · · Score: 1

    There's a feature here that everyone who uses iPhones should learn. When the iPhone sends it as an iMessage, it tells you in multiple ways. It says "iMessage" in the background of the text box you are typing in. The message you send shows up in a BLUE bubble. If you don't want to send as iMessage, but as SMS text instead, then AFTER you send it as an iMessage, touch the blue text bubble you just sent, and an option bar will show up above the message, which includes the option "SEND AS TEXT". Select that to make your phone re-send the message as a text message. The text bubble will turn GREEN to indicate it was sent as text instead of as iMessage.

  78. I message fix: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Change the contact. On the contact that switched, to the left of the number you can select the type of phone being used. Change from iPhone to mobile, and the issue will be fixed.

  79. This might help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this: Class Action Lawsuit

  80. android better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think samsung is on top op the market at the moment with htc and sony

  81. Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't help a lot of people, but if you decide to switch, make sure you turn iMessage OFF before trading your phone in...that will avert this incredibly frustrating crisis.

  82. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.who.int/gho/urban_health/situation_trends/urban_population_growth_text/en/

    The majority of the world's population now lives in urbanized areas. While not all of them necessarily live in "major" metropolitan areas, the percentage who do so is clearly more than 1%. The population of New York City alone, not even counting the wider metropolitan area, is 2.64% of the US population as of 2012 (according to WolframAlpha).

    You may or may not be myopic yourself, but you are certainly either bad at math or prone to hyperbole.