not the same poster, but its not that im scared of "insert group here" getting power. Im scared that whatever group in charge will spend billions of dollars to "fix" something that either A cant be fixed or B isnt going to cause a big enough dent to fix it cost efficiently. Lets just look at the obamacare website as one example (or IRAQ if you want to try and say im singling out the democrats) We threw 650 MILLION dollars at a website... that doesnt work and is not secure. So what do we do? instead of admitting it was a bad idea, we double down and give another company 90 million more. Now what are the odds that we need to throw even more at it in 2 months when they find out, oh yeah that didnt work. I know MORE MONEY!!!
The issue in my case is not whether or not man is causing warming or not, but if it is actually something that can be taken care of without sending us all back to wood and mud huts
As opposed to AGW truthers who believe that there can only be one cause for anything? That it is mans fault? I would say that the hardcore proponents of pro and anti AGW (or any extreme level of believing anything for that matter) would fall under the same scrutiny.
I would say its a pretty good bet being that If I were running the NSA and I had absolutly zero public trust as they do right now, I would be screaming for his head so I can say see, we are useful. But they dont
the network connection to the outside is for the credit app. I work for a company who deals with verifone pinpads and no internet, no pinpads. I would like to think that something like that could be on a secure secondary line locked down from HTTP and other traffic but it does not seem like they set it up that way
seriously. We keep hearing about how the NSA NEEDS all the data traffic in the world yet it takes a 3rd party a few weeks to find the guy and the NSA hasnt done jack shit
if the sissy heart bleeders would allow us to go back to more traditional methods of execution, firing squad, guillotine, hanging, you wouldnt have to worry about it. Every method I listed would end the life of the piece of shit in a matter of seconds
and our response should be fine, no more intel for you, no more money for you etc.
Frankly I want to go back to a time where we are non interventionist. Let other countries worry about themselves. If you dont want to sell me a product I want/need, Then I will no longer provide you with the intel that you want/need
on that note, why can we change th epunishment based on XX. Example, I kill you, its more than likely 2nd degree murder. BUT if you are a cop or some other "person of importance" It will be bumped to murder 1. That isnt fair either because as I always say murder is murder. If I kill someone regardless of the circumstances and they are a cop or politician,you can bet your ass ill be getting the death penalty, even if i was defending myself or it was accidental
It is only a fact because the appeals process was granted too many times over. 1 appeal, max 2. after that, kill them as they leave the court house, stop housing them,feeding them, taking care of them. Once they have been proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" that they did it, and they deserve to die, kill them already
rockoon, you were on a roll with that post until your 3/5ths argument. The facts behind the 3/5ths agreement was not that "black people are less than human" it was gerrymandering. A plantation owner would count his slaves Aas votes, 1 human 1 vote. the whigs I believe they were at the time were against the democratic policy of slavery, and they knew they could not form the USA without the south, the south would not give up slavery. So the compromise was that instead of giving each slave a vote (which was a puppet vote made by the slave owner, Each slave owner was in essence given however many votes as slaves) Each slaves vote would only count as 3/5th of a vote. in other words a slave owner who had 10 slaves, would only be given 6 votes for his slaves where he wanted all 10.
now the democrats of today like to spin this fact, because it was them who were against the 3/5th agreement, they like to say that they were for full rights, which is funny being that they were largly the slave owners, and in the 60s they were the ones against integration.
they rest of your comment is however dead on, I couldnt agree more
i know, we should all just write this man a stern letter telling him how unhappy we are with him. Im sure that will ensure that no laws are ever broken again!
to me if i were an innocent person unwrongly prosecuted, I would prefer death to life in prison. 50 years in an 8X8 box is cruel and unusual to me, death is an escape, when im dead, im dead its all over. no more suffering, no more problems. Life in prison though would be horrible
correct, and those who we know with 100% certainty that they deserve the punishment of death should be killed, not get 20 years of appeals. I am not talking the circumstantial cases, im talking the cases where there is absolute proof, he admitted it, or they have him on video. cases like that.
the reality is we dont know what would have happened because it didnt happen. Sure we can speculate, Im sure mccain was going to change the flag to the swastica with a sickle on it, thank GOD for obama otherwise we would all be nazi communists!
Slashdot Mirror
not the same poster, but its not that im scared of "insert group here" getting power. Im scared that whatever group in charge will spend billions of dollars to "fix" something that either A cant be fixed or B isnt going to cause a big enough dent to fix it cost efficiently. Lets just look at the obamacare website as one example (or IRAQ if you want to try and say im singling out the democrats) We threw 650 MILLION dollars at a website... that doesnt work and is not secure. So what do we do? instead of admitting it was a bad idea, we double down and give another company 90 million more. Now what are the odds that we need to throw even more at it in 2 months when they find out, oh yeah that didnt work. I know MORE MONEY!!!
The issue in my case is not whether or not man is causing warming or not, but if it is actually something that can be taken care of without sending us all back to wood and mud huts
wasnt there a scandal not too long ago about AGW supporters cherry picking data as well?
As opposed to AGW truthers who believe that there can only be one cause for anything? That it is mans fault? I would say that the hardcore proponents of pro and anti AGW (or any extreme level of believing anything for that matter) would fall under the same scrutiny.
but thats racist! its only because obamas black you want the ACA to fail1!!11! How dare you use actual reasoning and logic and constitutional theory!
Exactly. Obama will just decree that they can have more time, breaking his own laws once again
I would say its a pretty good bet being that If I were running the NSA and I had absolutly zero public trust as they do right now, I would be screaming for his head so I can say see, we are useful. But they dont
Because one cannot separate personal life and professional life. Let me guess you think no professionals ever do anything of the sort right?
the network connection to the outside is for the credit app. I work for a company who deals with verifone pinpads and no internet, no pinpads. I would like to think that something like that could be on a secure secondary line locked down from HTTP and other traffic but it does not seem like they set it up that way
seriously. We keep hearing about how the NSA NEEDS all the data traffic in the world yet it takes a 3rd party a few weeks to find the guy and the NSA hasnt done jack shit
Its not OK for us to break into computer systems, but its ok when the government does it.... I guess I can see your point
if the sissy heart bleeders would allow us to go back to more traditional methods of execution, firing squad, guillotine, hanging, you wouldnt have to worry about it. Every method I listed would end the life of the piece of shit in a matter of seconds
and our response should be fine, no more intel for you, no more money for you etc.
Frankly I want to go back to a time where we are non interventionist. Let other countries worry about themselves. If you dont want to sell me a product I want/need, Then I will no longer provide you with the intel that you want/need
on that note, why can we change th epunishment based on XX. Example, I kill you, its more than likely 2nd degree murder. BUT if you are a cop or some other "person of importance" It will be bumped to murder 1. That isnt fair either because as I always say murder is murder. If I kill someone regardless of the circumstances and they are a cop or politician ,you can bet your ass ill be getting the death penalty, even if i was defending myself or it was accidental
It is only a fact because the appeals process was granted too many times over. 1 appeal, max 2. after that, kill them as they leave the court house, stop housing them ,feeding them, taking care of them. Once they have been proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" that they did it, and they deserve to die, kill them already
I live in an area with multiple prisons. There are prison breaks at least once every few months around here
rockoon, you were on a roll with that post until your 3/5ths argument. The facts behind the 3/5ths agreement was not that "black people are less than human" it was gerrymandering. A plantation owner would count his slaves Aas votes, 1 human 1 vote. the whigs I believe they were at the time were against the democratic policy of slavery, and they knew they could not form the USA without the south, the south would not give up slavery. So the compromise was that instead of giving each slave a vote (which was a puppet vote made by the slave owner, Each slave owner was in essence given however many votes as slaves) Each slaves vote would only count as 3/5th of a vote. in other words a slave owner who had 10 slaves, would only be given 6 votes for his slaves where he wanted all 10.
now the democrats of today like to spin this fact, because it was them who were against the 3/5th agreement, they like to say that they were for full rights, which is funny being that they were largly the slave owners, and in the 60s they were the ones against integration.
they rest of your comment is however dead on, I couldnt agree more
I like george carlins plan. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pq9ZoGihurY
in your opinion, and many others. But not everyones
i know, we should all just write this man a stern letter telling him how unhappy we are with him. Im sure that will ensure that no laws are ever broken again!
to me if i were an innocent person unwrongly prosecuted, I would prefer death to life in prison. 50 years in an 8X8 box is cruel and unusual to me, death is an escape, when im dead, im dead its all over. no more suffering, no more problems. Life in prison though would be horrible
correct, and those who we know with 100% certainty that they deserve the punishment of death should be killed, not get 20 years of appeals. I am not talking the circumstantial cases, im talking the cases where there is absolute proof, he admitted it, or they have him on video. cases like that.
I would be for adding rapists and child molesters to the list of those who should be put to death.
as opposed by the hypocrisy of obama (a christian by his own admission) using drones to take out american citizens?
the reality is we dont know what would have happened because it didnt happen. Sure we can speculate, Im sure mccain was going to change the flag to the swastica with a sickle on it, thank GOD for obama otherwise we would all be nazi communists!
bu bu bu BUSH!!
seriously, bush hasnt been president for over 5 years now, come up with some new material