dont make assumptions. and by your logic it seems you want to outlaw all plastic. I mean you dont use plastic garbage bags right? why would you do such a thing that plastic ends up in the landfill!!!
but yes, i do in fact find a use for all the plastic bags that I get. I also reuse ziplocks when i can and reuse plastic chinese food dishes for bowls at times....
probably for the same reason you used the term "xtian" - something said only by those who hate christians. Im not even religious but i see it all the time on the net when people who hate christians are refering to them
im actually for that idea. If both major parties got on board to do such a thing, maybe americans would wake up and vote for someone else instead of a D or an R.
would you prefer them watch the dipshits on MSNBC??? they are the only group I know who make foxnews look sane. So just like with our elections we are stuck with 2 assholes, which one is worse, Id say MSNBC by a LONG shot
funny how the president has all this time to play golf or play cards while bin laden is being taken out, but cant meet with people actually trying to fix the damn place.
for someone making under 15 grand a year (sadly many americans these days) raising the cost of fuel will destroy them. 10 years ago a gallon of gas in NJ cost me 98 cents a gallon, today that cost is 3.75$. everything else has gone up in price due to higher shipping prices. If anything we need to get the cost of fuel back down to 80s 90 levels, I remember as a kid before I had a car the gas price was pretty much the same within 5-10 cents for the duration of the 90s, now it can change that much overnight, screwing the people who need it the most. Im with you on lower taxes though. The government clearly cant be trusted with our money, as shown by the fact that we are running trillion dollar deficits every year for 5 or 6 years now
hahha oh man all no recycleable materials banned in 2 years? I hate to tell you but developing an idea, researching its feasability and bringing it to the market is longer than a 2 year process. no, we need a multi decade process, similar to whats being done in the auto world. Give them 10 15 years to up the MPG numbers and they can do it (sure it costs us 5 grand more per car..... one reason I dont agree with them but I digress)
ill give you just one example on plastic shopping bags. I keep all mine in the pantry and they get used, either as garbage bags for small cans (bathrooms under the desk etc) they get used if i need to grab a few things to go to the beach or somewhere i dont want to bring a real bag with me. They get used to clean up the kitty litter.
just because you or others cant find a good use for a free bag doesnt mean the rest of us cant.
in D2 you had an online char and an offline char. there is no reason they cant do the same with D3. I was one of those dumb enough to pre order it many many months before release, beat it through within a few hours and havent picked it up since. Hell I STILL put D2 in from time to time
you stop at the DoD??? pfft, the same could be said of ALL federal employees. We could cut the federal government by 90% overnight and the vast majority of americans would not even feel a bee sting out of it. Plain and simple the federal government is suposed to be small, the states are suposed to be the ones with the power. Sometime about 100 years ago (some would argue the progressive movement) things changed and we started giving the federal government more power. First alcohol prohibition (which at least they had the decency to amend the constitution vs what they do these days and just claim power) and so on and so on. to be fair im sure someone will come out with previous abused by the federal government, for example jefferson overstepped when he made the LA purchase, but id say it was between 1915 and 1945 that the country radically changed, and not for the better. well, maybe for the short term but not long term.
only because people like you and people like obama say so. to me, the NAACP, PETA, the ACLU and others are all political (and in the tank for obama/democrats) when the republicans take over should we strip them of their rights???
The only people who are claiming "how obvious" it was, are those who side with the other side. plain and simple, it was a witch hunt, the IRS admited as much, yet someone supporters of obama and the demcrats are still justifying it. I mean hell, when the democrats lose the whitehouse (hopefully in 2016) i guess it is fair game to target liberal groups and deny them their rights correct?
followed by the death of someone by a fully auto car, which as everyone knows will cause the heads of those who damned the "normal" cars to the junkyards heads to explode because how could a system fail right?
to be fair, Ive been using cocksucker since before I knew what a homosexual was as an insult to someone for being a doushe. and on top of that, "cocksucker" fits a whore more than a homosexual, dont forget homosexuals can also be female, and therefore not, by definition, cocksuckers.
get with the times, "fag" doesnt mean a person of homosexual nature anymore. It just refers to someone being a doushebag. It hasnt meant a homosexual person in at least 10 years now except to the older crowd. Just like how gay still means happy or giddy to the even older then them crowd.
Or if you like fag can also refer to people who ride loud motorcycles
its not a good law if we cant shame criminals. shaming criminals is one of the few tools we have left to keep the common criminal from becoming the next big criminal. Ammend the law so that scenario 2 is not only allowed but encouraged to be spoken about while keeping scenario 2 illegal to talk about.
Slashdot Mirror
dont make assumptions. and by your logic it seems you want to outlaw all plastic. I mean you dont use plastic garbage bags right? why would you do such a thing that plastic ends up in the landfill!!!
but yes, i do in fact find a use for all the plastic bags that I get. I also reuse ziplocks when i can and reuse plastic chinese food dishes for bowls at times....
probably for the same reason you used the term "xtian" - something said only by those who hate christians. Im not even religious but i see it all the time on the net when people who hate christians are refering to them
im actually for that idea. If both major parties got on board to do such a thing, maybe americans would wake up and vote for someone else instead of a D or an R.
would you prefer them watch the dipshits on MSNBC??? they are the only group I know who make foxnews look sane. So just like with our elections we are stuck with 2 assholes, which one is worse, Id say MSNBC by a LONG shot
funny how the president has all this time to play golf or play cards while bin laden is being taken out, but cant meet with people actually trying to fix the damn place.
for someone making under 15 grand a year (sadly many americans these days) raising the cost of fuel will destroy them. 10 years ago a gallon of gas in NJ cost me 98 cents a gallon, today that cost is 3.75$. everything else has gone up in price due to higher shipping prices. If anything we need to get the cost of fuel back down to 80s 90 levels, I remember as a kid before I had a car the gas price was pretty much the same within 5-10 cents for the duration of the 90s, now it can change that much overnight, screwing the people who need it the most. Im with you on lower taxes though. The government clearly cant be trusted with our money, as shown by the fact that we are running trillion dollar deficits every year for 5 or 6 years now
you think 90% of americans are rich??? where do you live??? right now id say 5% of americans are rich, the rest of us just get by
hahha oh man all no recycleable materials banned in 2 years? I hate to tell you but developing an idea, researching its feasability and bringing it to the market is longer than a 2 year process. no, we need a multi decade process, similar to whats being done in the auto world. Give them 10 15 years to up the MPG numbers and they can do it (sure it costs us 5 grand more per car..... one reason I dont agree with them but I digress)
*over time
in other words,
" we saw the backlash and we dont want this to get any worse, pretend we never said anything, no harm no foul right?"
ill give you just one example on plastic shopping bags. I keep all mine in the pantry and they get used, either as garbage bags for small cans (bathrooms under the desk etc) they get used if i need to grab a few things to go to the beach or somewhere i dont want to bring a real bag with me. They get used to clean up the kitty litter.
just because you or others cant find a good use for a free bag doesnt mean the rest of us cant.
in D2 you had an online char and an offline char. there is no reason they cant do the same with D3. I was one of those dumb enough to pre order it many many months before release, beat it through within a few hours and havent picked it up since. Hell I STILL put D2 in from time to time
you spelled rape wrong
maybe i dont know, the 10th amendment???
you stop at the DoD??? pfft, the same could be said of ALL federal employees. We could cut the federal government by 90% overnight and the vast majority of americans would not even feel a bee sting out of it. Plain and simple the federal government is suposed to be small, the states are suposed to be the ones with the power. Sometime about 100 years ago (some would argue the progressive movement) things changed and we started giving the federal government more power. First alcohol prohibition (which at least they had the decency to amend the constitution vs what they do these days and just claim power) and so on and so on. to be fair im sure someone will come out with previous abused by the federal government, for example jefferson overstepped when he made the LA purchase, but id say it was between 1915 and 1945 that the country radically changed, and not for the better. well, maybe for the short term but not long term.
only because people like you and people like obama say so. to me, the NAACP, PETA, the ACLU and others are all political (and in the tank for obama/democrats) when the republicans take over should we strip them of their rights???
The only people who are claiming "how obvious" it was, are those who side with the other side. plain and simple, it was a witch hunt, the IRS admited as much, yet someone supporters of obama and the demcrats are still justifying it. I mean hell, when the democrats lose the whitehouse (hopefully in 2016) i guess it is fair game to target liberal groups and deny them their rights correct?
followed by the death of someone by a fully auto car, which as everyone knows will cause the heads of those who damned the "normal" cars to the junkyards heads to explode because how could a system fail right?
to be fair, Ive been using cocksucker since before I knew what a homosexual was as an insult to someone for being a doushe. and on top of that, "cocksucker" fits a whore more than a homosexual, dont forget homosexuals can also be female, and therefore not, by definition, cocksuckers.
typo - I meant scenario 1 should not only be legal it should be encouraged.
I have never heard that before but it is a wonderful quote, or paraphrase at worst. Thanks! I have noticed the same thing over the years.
pfft, I dont care what they say 2014 WILL be the year of Unix on the Desktop!
its sad that many people see the american political game to mean all americans support it. we dont, many of us dont
get with the times, "fag" doesnt mean a person of homosexual nature anymore. It just refers to someone being a doushebag. It hasnt meant a homosexual person in at least 10 years now except to the older crowd. Just like how gay still means happy or giddy to the even older then them crowd.
Or if you like fag can also refer to people who ride loud motorcycles
its not a good law if we cant shame criminals. shaming criminals is one of the few tools we have left to keep the common criminal from becoming the next big criminal. Ammend the law so that scenario 2 is not only allowed but encouraged to be spoken about while keeping scenario 2 illegal to talk about.