while you are right about them being infested, i can honestly say that every bit of reporting over there seemed to be as neutral as possible, especially with those facts in play.
Actually ars seemed to be one of the few places ive seen reporting the trial at hand throughout, and not making it all biased towards her. Ars was pretty nutral but the reporting made it seem as if she was a spoiled entitled brat.
but there is nothing in there that you cannot find on your own already. there really isnt any new information here. it would be like telling me i cant write a book on snowden because of secrets...except for the secrets are already out there
when people try and censor stuff that is already public. We see it here, we see it with snowden (im not talking classified stuff) but if this person got the information without looking at classified materials, who do they think they are to tell him to not publish?
ahh yes, Somalia, the land of the free, strawman of the liberals.
20K kids in america die in poverty ever day??? Citation??? because if that were true id like to think that the media (at LEAST MSNBC) would be all over it
salary caps are a new thing in the scheme of things and somehow i knew someone would come in and bring them up but none of that matters because the point I was responding to was one on equal outcomes, not equal opportunity
equal opportunities means that no one is barred for doing X. whether one can afford to do X is another story completely
By trying to equalize outcomes you do a couple things. You teach a portion of the public that they dont have to do anything because the government will take care of them. this is bad because the cycle gets worse not better
You should not be punishing people who do right, which is what happens why you try and equalize outcomes
Lets take sports for example, I would never want to see equal outcomes in sports, it would kill the game. patriots won the superbowl last year? well, we cant let them win again until all the other teams get a win, because, you know fairness. Plain and simple that is wrong on so many levels
Slashdot Mirror
ahh yes, good ol somalia, which for some reason complete idiots like to relate them with libertarians.....
as soon as I see somalia in a comment, I know we are dealing with a wingbat of some sort
the anti-ILLEGALimmigrant candidate born in Canada
FTFY
the only time i ever go to best buy is if i need something *now* and cant wait. which is maybe once ever few years
Thats a lie, sometimes I go to simply try a new product demo or something
while you are right about them being infested, i can honestly say that every bit of reporting over there seemed to be as neutral as possible, especially with those facts in play.
well if she couldnt even pass top secret security clearance... she doesnt deserve the job either....
My question is this
So because hillary is found to be lying... i mean in the dark about her email, why are we all of a sudden asking everyone about theirs??
Is it to try and shift the topic?
Is it to actually try and get electronic document reform?
is it for nothing but gotya moments on old guys who dont understand tech?
Did you ever notice that only assholes and douchebags ARE SJWs?
FTFY
people need to be put in some type of containment for the mentally challenged. Starting with you though
Actually ars seemed to be one of the few places ive seen reporting the trial at hand throughout, and not making it all biased towards her. Ars was pretty nutral but the reporting made it seem as if she was a spoiled entitled brat.
fine 100K a day until the job is done
well, if you said prior to 1900 (as we are doing in the case here, but 1945) you would be correct.
it wasnt 80K civilians first of all, a large number of them were working towards supporting the war effort.
If someone hit detroit in the 40s and took out GM, would you say they took out civies? no they were building the machines of war!
which can and does happen. thanks for backing my point
only government employees have that restriction
women, children, and other civilian
That comment is kinda sexist
but there is nothing in there that you cannot find on your own already. there really isnt any new information here. it would be like telling me i cant write a book on snowden because of secrets...except for the secrets are already out there
war is ugly
when people try and censor stuff that is already public. We see it here, we see it with snowden (im not talking classified stuff) but if this person got the information without looking at classified materials, who do they think they are to tell him to not publish?
Which is where cutting out coke comes in.
really? I thought you took more to lose weight!
ahh yes, Somalia, the land of the free, strawman of the liberals.
20K kids in america die in poverty ever day??? Citation??? because if that were true id like to think that the media (at LEAST MSNBC) would be all over it
salary caps are a new thing in the scheme of things and somehow i knew someone would come in and bring them up but none of that matters because the point I was responding to was one on equal outcomes, not equal opportunity
bush tax cuts expired, if he continued them, they are now his. Funny how that works
equal opportunities means that no one is barred for doing X. whether one can afford to do X is another story completely
By trying to equalize outcomes you do a couple things. You teach a portion of the public that they dont have to do anything because the government will take care of them. this is bad because the cycle gets worse not better
You should not be punishing people who do right, which is what happens why you try and equalize outcomes
Lets take sports for example, I would never want to see equal outcomes in sports, it would kill the game. patriots won the superbowl last year? well, we cant let them win again until all the other teams get a win, because, you know fairness. Plain and simple that is wrong on so many levels
heh, somehow i missed seatle when reading it the first time, which would have been the clear giveaway. Thanks AC
the governments role should be to
ensure that the people who belong to this country are safe
ensure everyone has equal opportunities (not equal outcomes)