Slashdot Mirror
Ellen Pao Loses Silicon Valley Gender Bias Case Against Kleiner Perkins
vivaoporto writes As reported by the New York Times, USA Today and other publications, a jury of six men and six women rejected current Reddit Inc CEO Ellen Pao's claims against her former employer, the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Ms. Pao's suit, that alleged employment discrimination based on gender, workplace retaliation and failure to take reasonable steps to prevent gender discrimination, asked $16 million in compensatory damages plus punitive damages. The jury decided, after more than two days of deliberation and more than four weeks of testimony, that her formed employer neither discriminated against the former junior partner for her gender, nor fired the complainant because of a high-profile gender discrimination lawsuit against the firm in 2012. She alleged that Kleiner Perkins had promoted male partners over equally qualified women at the firm, including herself, and then retaliated against her for raising concerns about the firm's gender dynamics by failing to promote her and finally firing her after seven years at the firm after she filed her 2012 lawsuit.
tech how?
So?.... Is this important?
Jury: Kleiner Perkins not liable for Pao’s gender discrimination claims [Updated] Trial highlighted Silicon Valley's male-dominated tech and investment culture. via http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
That's gotta burn
Need more SJW posts per day.
Slashdoit is going to a gutter.
This makes no sense. The internet has told me all women everywhere are oppressed by men. Obviously anyone on this jury is either an individual with internalized misogyny or is just a flat out gender traitor.
"Ellen Pao gender-bias lawsuit is a setback for women"
http://www.cnbc.com/id/1025377...
Written by a female ex-CEO.
In a nutshell, the case is obviously frivolous, and if it had succeeded it would have been another barrier for women in the industry because companies would see a female applicant and go, "Is she worth the risk?"
This is the new Eternal September. I personally blame smartphones and twitter. The SJW is getting more extreme and bigoted by the day, hopefully it implodes soon when the facade of equality breaks down.
Man has an affair on the job, expects to get fired, woman has an affair on the job, expects $16M. Nothing coming out of this case makes it look like she had even the tiniest shred of evidence she didn't deserve what she got besides her gender.
I thought the 4th claim still had to be deliberated because the jury count was 8-4 NO, but needed a 9-3 count to deny Pao's claim.
I don't mean the article but this gender bias issue which is almost entirely factious and where not factious almost always radical hyperbole.
The gender wage game since the 1970s has been less then TWO percent not 30 percent WHEN you factor in years on the job. Nearly every comparison between men and women that cite a large gender pay game ignores that the women often take as many as ten years off while they raise children. To compare that person's value to the company against someone that didn't take those ten years off is either gross incompetence or calculated deceit. And that was in the 1970s and that is only when factoring for a SINGLE additional variable.
There are other variables that can easily account for the remaining 2 percent and then some.
Subject this garbage to the cold light of reality and it evaporates into nothing.
By all means, contradict me... but if you do, provide some logic and if you cite evidence, expect it to be audited.
I will accept nothing from anyone that isn't open to examination.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
They're starting to enclave up in videogames, much like what happened with the atheism movement. It took a few extra years but the "atheism+" crap is now collapsing under it's own corruption and regular atheism is going along just fine still. And of course there's now a similar thing to gamergate starting in comic books and heavy metal. Everything they touch they turn into a political issue, and when they don't get their way they claim sexism, bigotry, racism, or whatever else to try and make people back down. Funny enough, many of them actually sexist, bigots or racists and that can be easily seen in their social commentary on twitter or facebook.
Om, nomnomnom...
Just what is it about her leggedness?
SJW is a defined term (all the results from Google define it the same) that carries a rather nuanced and complicated definition that is hard to describe otherwise. Stop playing tone police, generalizing and generally behaving like a troll.
But instead she just got owned by the room.
For some great background on how corrupt Pao and her husband are, see "Some Thoughts on Ellen Pao’s Marriage", by Richard Bradley. Basically, Pao's husband has a history of dubious lawsuits, and Pao seems to have gone along in his family suing business.
That seems correct. A lot of companies will think: "Don't hire women. They may accuse someone of "gender bias" or "sexual harassment". In the U.S. at present, that is an easy way to get money without earning it.
A long time ago, I was dating an attractive woman who had 2 jobs in traditionally male areas. I said to her, "Women often say they have trouble with unacceptable male attention." She told me, "They ask for it!" (Exact quote) I questioned her and learned that opinion of hers was very strong and rooted in considerable experience.
She always dressed in a way that made people respect her.
SJW is only used by a smallish group, so it makes sense that the group that sticks together and acts as if there's a big conspiracy against them come to the same definition. These people sit around waiting for some slashdot story to roll about social issue just so that they can jump out and shout SJW! at someone. It's kind of pathetic.
I like SWT myself for the anti-SJW derps - Single White Troll.
She just has to claim she got because of this law suit rape and death threads and had to leave her house. In no time she is a twitter star and.....?????? ..... Profit.
No matter win or lose, the lawsuit itself has done much damage to the Silicon Valley
In the eyes of the investors the Silicon Valley no longer represents a place where technology means everything, where one can get the best talents to work on and create marvelous new and fancy and profitable ways to boldly forge new pathways towards the next technological frontier
No
The Silicon Valley, thanks to the feminazis like Ms. Pao, has turned into a place where one can get sued just because one bases one's hiring on the best qualified candidates - and not on the basis of creed, gender and/or racial background
The world today that we live in the Silicon Valley is no longer the only place where the investors can find talents - nowadays there are so many options for the investors - They can also go to Europe or India or Korea or Japan or China or Singapore or even Africa / South America
If America does not stop these kind of frivolous lawsuits from happening, it gonna make the Silicon Valley a very unwelcome place for those with money to invest - and investors in general do not like to invest in places where 'political minefield' are abound
Just because the SJW are right that your kind should die doesn't make them not right. That makes them right. Republicans are so stupid they don't understand SJWs. That makes them stupid. That is the way of their kind. They hate everyone. People that stand for social justice stand for social justice.
Interim CEO. Can't wait till SRS becomes default. Already questions in /r/legaladvice on how to carefully dump a problematic CEO.
Men are second class citizens. Get over it. Move on.
Did you ever notice that only assholes and douchebags ARE SJWs?
FTFY
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
...how will this reflect on her husband's Ponzi scheme lawsuits.
Those $16 million would have probably come in handy.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Ellen K. Pao, with her husband Alphonse "Buddy" Fletcher , are both Harvard Educated scam artists
Read the following link to see how Ms. Pao's hubby has stolen more than $150million from many victims, including Massachusetts and Louisiana cops and firefighters
http://nypost.com/2015/02/18/case-builds-against-former-ny-hedgie-buddy-fletcher/
No, I really don't think that you do, Anonymous Coward.
...and then retaliated against her for raising concerns about the firm's gender dynamics by failing to promote her and finally firing her after seven years at the firm after she filed her 2012 lawsuit.
Why would someone expect their employer to keep them around after they file a lawsuit against them?
http://imgur.com/gallery/PWfY4
Lawsuits like this are in reality most often demands which have a sense of
entitlement as a true motive.
I am beyond pleased that this suit was correctly dealt with by the courts.
I disagree, the term is popping up in mainstream news articles and non-internet related matters. "SWT" is a racist generalization if I've ever heard one.
What about the women who work for women? As in those companies founded and governed by women? Are all their female employees discriminated against by the female management?
If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
I'm married, shitlord.
Is ?????? Patreon?
Dear Sir/Madam,
Do you understand the definition of Talent??
Women comprise over 50% of population and any country that can tap that talent (and most countries cannot) suddenly has access to 2x the number of capable candidates
Of course the female folks comprise over 50% of the population, but your attempt of equating raw numbers to the availability of real talent is seriously flawed!
"She always dressed in a way that made people respect her."
That's horrifying.
I'm a middle-aged male. I have waist length hair, a huge beard and never iron anything. I definitely don't dress so people respect me, but people respect me because I am an expert. Why should women have to dress so people respect them to be valid people?
The unkempt person in the high level meeting is either the client or a technical expert.
The client is unkempt because, hey, screw you, you want their business, you put up with them.
The technical expert is unkempt because They Can Get Away With It Because They Are The Expert. It's actually part of their robes of office.
In other professions, there are other uniforms. Finance people always have very expensive clothing because they want to exude an aura of money. Do you trust a finance person in a Grateful Dead T-Shirt? Maybe, if you are scoring weed from them at a concert, but in a business meeting, you expect Warren Buffet will be in his suit and tie.
Everyone else "dresses for success".
Professionally Offended
You claim to dislike the article because it provides no facts, and follow that up with two of your own assertions which appear to be nothing more than slander. I am assuming you have facts which back these two statements.
basically, she an extreme capitalist that doesn't believe in "workers' rights" at all.
she's saying "hey, being discriminating on? just leave and work somewhere else. it's a free country."
I make no claim that you have to agree with her opinion, but I do claim that poisoning the well with slander is a pathetic way of garnering agreements with your own opinion. Placing the proverbial icing on the cake, your last statement is completely irrational.
"leave and get a new job or start your own business."
that's just a little elitist. assuming everyone has the capital to start their own business.
Notice that your short rant omits exactly half of the text which _you_ quoted. She stated very clearly "get a new job or start your own business" according to your quote.
Surely I agree that finding a new job is not always easy, but it is an option that the majority of people take when they dislike something at their place of work. Good grief, the exodus from Michigan was massive after the automotive collapses so people (including myself) packed up and moved thousands of miles to find better working conditions and jobs. Choices are not always easy to make, but there certainly are choices. Further, there are good employers out there. I'd agree that it's not a majority but there are quite a few. Call my personal anecdote and yours a wash and we could say roughly half.
As a personal note, calling someone an "extreme capitalist" is not an insult. Adam Smith was brilliant, and Milton Friedman did a great job of modernizing his work. Attempting to blame capitalism failures on the extreme levels of corruption we have in Government is simply delusional. Unchecked corruption breaks all economic systems and forms of Government. You can check my statement against every Government in history. Capitalism and the US Republic were attempts to keep systems healthy for a longer duration, and in that respect they were extremely successful.
Lacking citations to back your seemingly false assertions, I do hope to see an apology for the slander. I have no expectation mind you, but I am occasionally incorrect judging character.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Based on the technical women I've worked with, I have to agree with one thing you said:
Women comprise over 50% of population and any ... that can tap that ... suddenly has a tremendous advantantage
Kidding, of course. Seriously, what you said is true not only of countries, but of COMPANIES. Companies who hire and promote people who do well have a tremendous, almost insurmountable advantage. A company who wasted half of their good people and good candidates would quickly be beat by the competition. Therefore, tremendous successful companies like Google MUST be promoting people who are both technically and with "people skills", employees who work well with others. If Google systematically ignored half the available talent, Apple or Microsoft would wipe the floor with them. They'd never had gotten this big because Yahoo would have had twice as many really good people. Therefore natural forces are such that companies that identify and nurture effective people (effective technically and as a team member) will grow and will win.
Just don't. Gender issues have gotten to the point of religious fanaticism. You already pointed out one refutation. Every woman having a case against their employer for sexism. How absurd to think that every single woman everywhere is being discriminated against without exception, yet someone here on slashdot was reading at level 0 and modded that up.
Social justice now! Equal rights for otherkin headmates! Why should imaginary fox-people be denied the same rights as straight white men?
Should sexist opensource developers have their projects censored or removed?
Recently an opensource game release story was removed due to the game developer's open sexism(0) and harrasment(1) of women in tech.
A story posted by the editor of the popular Phoronix linux news site about a release of an Open Source videogame was later manually removed(2). The reason cited was the game developer's unacceptable views on social issues such as gender equality (3).
The release story was titled "Xonotic-Forked ChaosEsqueAnthology Sees New Release - Phoronix" and can be accessed via the google cache(4).
With the recent inclusion of a code of conduct(5) for those wishing to contribute to the Linux Kernel some questions now need to be asked and answered about the inclusion of code from people who are known to engage in or promote socially unacceptable attitudes or harrasments of those whom the free-software movement would prefer to attract in their place:
* Are the social or political views of an author of free software relevant to that software's inherent quality?
* Should the beliefs of an opensource developer weigh when when evaluating whether a piece of opensource software is worthy of any publicity or public notice?
* Should men with unpopular or "forbidden" views be excised from the opensource movement and "not allowed" to contribute, in a manner similar to that which is done in employment?
* Has the free/opensource software movement changed in these respects since its founding? If so is this a positive change?
* Should there be gatekeepers to opensource that decide who may and who may not contribute. Should abusive developers be "blackballed" to maintain proper social order and controls?
and
* What are the consequences of not doing this
Citations:
(0) Past related incident: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1310
(1) http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/...
(2) Removed story URL: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.p...
(3) http://www.phoronix.com/forums...
"Fortunately, the article has been removed now."
"Thanks everybody for speaking up."
(4) https://webcache.googleusercon...
(5) Linux "Code of Conflict"
.
.
does the using this word qualify for Godwin's law?
Yes. Giving interviews from the house claimed to be driven from is optional.
only assholes and douchebags use the term SJW?
Awww, don't get all butthurt just because not everyone gives a shit about your poor widdle feewings.
the fact that you have a small penis
Nobody's ever going to show you a penis, you pathetic land whale cunt.
Ah, so Martin Luther King and Gandhi are assholes and douchebags!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
Well, if I have to be lumped together with those, well, that's a quite amazing complement and one I'm not sure I deserve, but what the hell!
SJW n. One who posts facts.
She had a not-showy manner of dressing that looked both excellent and comfortable.
She was comfortable around men. Men accepted her as someone with whom they could talk.
Most women in the U.S. show by their manner that they aren't comfortable around men.
It's always possible to see limitations in anything anyone says.
It's healthy to look for the good in what people say.
Nice going grouping yourself in with Gandhi. He was not an SJW. He was against real, not perceived, injustices.
Because Wikipedia articles are always right and are never created by someone who wants to put their finger in someone's eye.
No, Ghandi and MLK would HATE the SJWs. Hate is a strong word for them, so let me clarify: In the sense that they would disagree with SJW methods, try to debate them to get them on the right path, and therefor be labeled toxic by the SJWS.
They were about brotherhood and bringing people together. SJWs are about Hating white men and attacking women and minorities who do not fall in line. Pocketbook first, Equality never.
and there are several such lawsuits going on, they're just a bit smaller scale because this one involved a really, really rich lady. It also made the news during a slow news cycle. Really, it's not that big a deal. Investors don't care. Everywhere's a political minefield. Shit happens.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
The fact that you're so unself-consciously self-righteous and equate yourself with Ghandi and MLK (you brought them up, remember) is a major cause of the rest of us failing to take SJWs seriously. How can a person un-ironicially do something like that casually in conversation?
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Those people actually DID things for social justice, rather than holding 5 minute hates online.
oh wow. How delusional are you?
Good to know what level of nutbag we are dealing with.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi were not "Social Justice Warriors". They were activists willing to do a lot, sacrifice a lot, to attain equal rights peacefully. A "Social Justice Warrior" is someone that claims to be fighting the good fight, but it's just a thin veneer over their massive ego, self-entitlement, and their own form of "jewelry". They usually hail from a very comfortable lifestyle both growing up and now, and are just charlatans trying to profit from controversy. Their motives are fame and power, not altruism and a capability to empathize. To summarize - An activist may fight, and even win, to get government buildings to have wheelchair access ramps, so that paraplegics and quadriplegics can more easily access said buildings (or even to make it a part of building codes for private businesses, etc). A "Social Justice Warrior" would instead, rather, remove the stairs to look like they were doing something worthwhile and of the belief it may hurt the feelings of the disabled.
"Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
The proper verdict would have been to destroy both the KP partners and Pao as they all horrible human beings.
...
The partner (?)...
...
given to a loser...
...
Indian sleazebag...
...
an utter whore and slut...
...
All I can say is, "Kill them with fire. All of them."
As for this part:
1. The partner (?) who did not want to invite the women in the company to a getaway with Al Gore because it would "kill the buzz." The buzz would be killed because the excluded party were women, not because they were unpleasant people.
http://recode.net/2015/02/25/a...
And about that Al Gore dinner, Chien said that only 10 people could fit in the former vice president's living room, and only three of them were affiliated with Kleiner Perkins. Pao herself had actually suggested some invitees who were male: The CEOs of Yelp and Dropbox.
Chien insisted he'd never said anything about women killing the buzz. "Absolutely not," he said. Pao's filing was "the first time I had ever heard of the phrase."
And about the all-guy ski trip? Chien said he'd actually invited fellow Kleiner colleague Mary Meeker, but she couldn't make it. And besides, she has her own house in the area, he said.
...
Could Path founder Dave Morin invite a female entrepreneur from a Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers portfolio company on the firm's 2012 ski trip to Colorado, organized by then senior partner Chi-Hua Chien?
He could not, Chien said. As he explained in an email at the time, "The issue is that we are staying in condos, and I was thinking that gents wouldn't mind sharing, but gals might. Why don't we punt on her and find 2 guys who are awesome. We can add 4-8 women next year."
There were no women on the 2012 ski trip, and there would be no ski trip the next year.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Many here have said that she was suing just to get money, and that is likely true.
However, as a woman in tech I can tell you that even though this lawsuit might have been a scam, it doesn't mean that there is no discrimination out there.
There's a lot of comments here saying that the pay gap is only due to women going out of the workforce during their child-bearing years. It is not just that. Sure, women that go on maternity leave may "lose time" and thus be paid less than their colleagues that didn't, but that's not the only reason. Men are promoted on expectations, whereas women are promoted on acomplishments. This means that a woman needs to go do more and prove herself more than a man in order to get the same promotion.
Several studies have shown that when faced with the SAME RESUME changing the name from a female to a male one will raise the intended salary. When faced with the same performance review, changing the name to male will raise the overall score and the monetary bonus. The gender of the person selecting the salary or bonus is irrelevant, women and men equally discriminate against women.
Some comments mentioned women not studying CS because they weren't interested or similar stuff. Sure, some women might not be interested. But a lot of women leave the tech industry every year, at all the stages (students, graduates, employees, managers, etc) due to the constant pressure to prove that they actually belong there. It's in the small stuff that accumulates over time, like a female conference attendee (or even speaker) being taken to be someone's girlfriend, a female programmer getting handed all the admin work for the team, a female engineer being told that she would understand a certain solution to a problem because it's too complex. It's in larger things like a new hire being told by her peers that she only got hired because she's a woman, in promotion processes that require assertiveness (a trait that most women find hard) even though the job itself doesn't call for that, and a culture that values hours in front of the monitor over actual results (in general, women value their free time more, and they will work harder in order to leave early, but this is not something the tech industry in general appreciates).
And all of this is without mentioning harassment. There's a lot of harassment towards women in the tech industry. And not only sexual harassment (of which there is plenty and hopefully you don't need examples of this), there's also plain anti-women harassment, i.e. people telling it to your face that you are not good enough because you are a woman, managers refusing to give their female employees big projects because they don't believe them capable, thus making them unable to prove that they are... And to top it all there's the GamerGate.
Most women leave quietly, there's plenty of those. For the few that don't, there's thousands of male voices eager to shut them down, claiming over and over that they are exaggerating or directly lying, and then threatening to swat them, rape them, kill them... No wonder most choose the silent path.
So, please, even if we agree that this suit was absurd and just a grab to get money, do not take this to mean that there is no discrimination. There is. A lot of it. And the vast majority of those discriminated just take it silently because they know that it's the safest route. And it will still be until we as a society do something to change this.
Margarita Manterola.
A social justice warrior is...
[citation needed]
SJW is a term meaning "shit I hate on the internet", and is wielded as an insult by various people. As such is wildly inconsistent. If, however you look at people, real or imagined, that actually fight for social justice, then the picture is quite different.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
Gandhi refused to let British doctors give his wife a life-saving shot of penicillin, on the grounds that she should not have alien substances injected in her body. This was a death sentence for her. And yet he was willing to accept quinine when he himself later contracted malaria. He also let British doctors perform an appendectomy on him, another alien intrusion to be sure.
Anti-Western, or post-colonial, intellectuals and activists bring up the West's rap sheet not because we were uniquely complicit in slavery, colonialism, and imperialism, but because we are uniquely vulnerable to such guilt mongering. "I think it would be a good idea," Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi famously replied when asked what he thought of Western civilization, as if Indian civilization was without sin. To this day, left-wing poseurs have this line stuck to their refrigerators or use it for yearbook quotes as if it is a brilliantly insightful and humorous bon mot, when in reality the joke is on them.
Gandhi was in many respects the pioneer of exploiting Western self-loathing. For many pacifists, "What Would Gandhi Do?" is a more important question than "What would Jesus Do?" and for good reason. Jesus did believe that violent self-defense was sometimes justified (that's why he instructed his followers to carry swords). Gandhi did not.
Undoubtedly one of the most idiosyncratic world leaders in modern memory. Particularly given the prevalence of New Age pieties these days, he has become a saint of sorts. A true ascetic, Gandhi voluntarily eschewed luxurious pleasures. He found satisfaction in more humble pastimes. Indeed, among his greatest joys and fascinations was the successful bowel movement.
Paul Johnson notes that the first question he asked of his female attendants every morning was "Did you have a good bowel movement?" One of his favorite books, which e reread often, was Constipation and Our Civilization. Deprived of a sense of smell, which no doubt impaired his sense of taste his vegetarian diet was centered around the goal of a successful digestive cycle.
His advice on both personal diet and public agriculture was not merely impractical and gloomy. Had his ideas been translated into public policy they would have subjected millions of Indians to even worse starvation and even more pervasive poverty than they were already enduring. Gandhi's social and economic vision was perhaps best described as Tolkienesque. Technology was the enemy of decency, the perfect political unit was the Arcadian village, a subcontinental Shire where, instead of hobbits, Hindus would work individually on their tiny looms.
Of course, you would not know this from the film that helped cement the Gandhian legend. For instance, in Gandhi the movie, audiences are led to believe that his first hunger strike was to protest the British police's horrific slaughter of a crowd of peaceful Indian protesters. But Gandhi's first hunger strike was devoted to protesting a British effort to grand the Untouchables-India's lowest and most oppressed caste-greater rights and freedoms, including providing them with access to a form of affirmative action. That wouldn't play as well on the big screen, alas.
The filmmakers were merely picking up on a practice begun by the British foreign office. Simply put, Gandhi was a creature of the system he sought to overthrow. For years the British Empire used Gandhi as the most convenient nationalist. Unlike other anti-colonial activists, Gandhi worked assiduously to prevent violence. "The true oddity," writes Richard Grenier, "is that Gandhi, this holy man, having drawn from British sources his notions of nationalism and democracy, also absorbed from the British his model of virtue in public life. He was a historical original, a Hindu holy man that a British model of public service and dazzling advances in mass communications thrust out into the world, to become a great moral leader and the 'father of his country'."
Gandhi's accomplishments were great, but absent the con
Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
A study on anonymous hiring practices in France showed that anonymization resulted in fewer minority candidates getting hired. Their explanation is essentially that the companies who care enough about diversity to participate in this sort of study are already subtly biased in favor of minority candidates, and anonymization put a stop to it. Considering the amount of focus big tech companies are putting on diversity, there's a fair chance the same thing is happening here too.
Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
She only got her post at Reddit because she was friends with Yishan Wong. One of her decisions is having twox as a default sub against the wishes of mods.
Bang Ding Ou
Wa Da Ruk
We Tu Wo
Ho Ri Fuk
Ha ha
Dumbest career move for any human to make.
I read an article about how Trae Vassallo (a co-worker of Pao's) testified that she received sexual advances from men at the company. Then I looked up Trae Vassallo on Google Images and found a "professional" photo of her where you can literally see through her blouse and see her bra. And she wonders why men made advances on her.
Yeah, because the idiots at Tumblr, the extreme feminists and their ilk are the moral and historial equivalent of MLK and Gandhi.
Your bullshit commentary on every article about women is getting old. Way to fallacize.
http://www.urbandictionary.com...
https://encyclopediadramatica....
Your attempt to re-define SJW has failed.