have to admit that it's completely stupid the way chrome has 10 same-named processes in an emergency with me having zero idea of which ones will kill which tab or the whole browser session.
This, and the "use all memory" bug are the reasons I don't use Chrome. At least with Firefox I can (1) close non-essential tabs, (2) shut it down, (3) reload it and get reasonable memory usage.
Using all memory, with nothing but Netflix player running, is supremely uncool of Chrome.
The browser will use all of computer's memory. Forcing a shutdown of Chrome eventually, or total dog performance. Tons of people having this issue and clogging up the forums. I'm just telling Chrome users to do a full shutdown once a day, but this is hardly a solution.
Then you must really like Windows 8. Boots twice as fast as Windows 7.x and earlier. I left W8 on my laptop for exactly this reason. My desktops run 7 because I rarely reboot them.
Who here has ever gone to bestbuy.com in lieu of newegg or Amazon?
I go when my deal site says BestBuy has the best deal on the item I need at that moment. Many retailers dabble (loss leaders) in areas they are not normally competitive in. The deal sites pick up on this, and people like myself benefit.
Makes one wonder if his "sales of share to BBC" deal involved him staying for at least 12 months. Would be good business sense from the BBC's point of view.
Everything is hired out. I still can't figure how stuff gets built.
By contracting out, you get people who actually want to do good work for reasonable pay. Unlike union workers, or "set for life" big company employees.
Where I live the city has contracted out extensive sewer work. These contract workers are superb. You wouldn't see one-quarter of this efficiency with a union city crew. Everyone, including the city (and the city union bosses!), knows this.
Drinking is drinking. It is physically and psychologically addictive, whether from regular "light" embibing or binge drinking.
Those "wonderfully reasonable" French are probably ALL addicted. They would suffer, especially physically, if they tried to stop.
My father was a "reasonable" drinker. Glass of wine at dinner, and nothing else. I lived with the guy for 17 years, then (after moving out) would visit for summer holidays each year.
I got a chance to watch the problem develop. The man was addicted, and it wasn't a pretty sight. But he never drank more than 2 glasses of wine, and only at a meal.
This catalyst is for destroying stockpiles, but for helping with decontamination. Previously they were using an enzyme that is hard to deploy, and they've replaced that enzyme with an engineered catalyst that does the same chemistry, albeit less efficiently.
So, they already had a way. But it was "hard". And now they have another way but it is "less efficient" (i.e. probably costs more). How is any of this news?
The destruction of a chemical weapon is rather trivial, when you can conveniantly dunk the toxin in a vat of acid, or base, or solvent or whatever. Dioxins burn really well, for example.
The sticky bit is stopping it from entering people via their skin or lungs, eyes, etc. when the toxin is already dispersed.
In short, this wonderful new compound is utterly useless.
Thank you. Not sure how that meshes with people drinking wheat grass juice -- having seen it grown, when the shoots are young, they look exactly like wild grass.
This WebMD page suggests a few reasons, including "One published study reports on a miniature poodle that ate grass and then vomited every day for seven years. Three days after putting the dog on a high-fiber diet, the owner reported that the dog stopped eating grass entirely."
This WebMD page says that "dogs today seek out plants as an alternative food source. Most commonly the plant is grass". It goes on to say: "A dog will seek out a natural remedy for a gassy or upset stomach, and grass, it seems, may do the trick. When ingested, the grass blade tickles the throat and stomach lining; this sensation, in turn, may cause the dog to vomit, especially if the grass is gulped down rather than chewed."
"Although dogs don't typically graze on large amounts of grass like a cow, they may nibble on grass, chew on it for a while, and not throw up (an unwell dog will tend to gulp the grass down in big bites and then throw up).
This seems much more like why my dog eats (or bites at) grass.
"Whatever the reason may be, most experts see no danger in letting your dog eat grass. In fact, grass contains essential nutrients that a dog might crave, especially if they're on a commercial diet."
It seems to me that humans don't know why dogs do it. But that it is good for dogs. And no, I've never seen my dogs "drunk" from grass eating.
If symptoms persist, take one.
If symptoms persist, take one-half.
If symptoms persist, take one-quarter. ...
By the way, has anyone seen what dogs do with grass? Ok, it varies a bit by dog. Some eat grass (and throw it up later) while others simply bite at the grass (swallowing little or none and not throwing it up later).
The point is, why do they do it?
I postulate, with the second category of dog, that they are getting a hint, an "essence of grass", and using that as an intentional "almost at homeopathic levels" treatment.
Our dog memorizes where the grass patches are and will want to head down certain blocks just to get to that grass.
BTW, regular lawn grass doesn't work and they will shun it. The best grass is "weed" grass that grows wildly, is longer than lawn grass and the best of the best has a wide blade -- the grass is several times wider than lawn grass.
As to your point, have a look at the ratio of data to programs on your hard drive. Not counting audio/video, data size is microscopic compared to program size.
The amount of data the *could* be collected is related to the features on the iWatch, both today's and any future version. Thin edge of the wedge and all that.
So you have 2 people who think differently and thinking the other is wrong.
When two theories are available and both are compatible with the facts, then there are no other criteria to prefer one
over the other except the intuition of the researcher. So
one can understand why intelligent scientists, cognizant
both of theories and of facts, can still be passionate
adherents of opposing theories.
- Albert Einstein
In short, one has to provide reasons why their way is better, and many are not interested in doing that.
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder what long distance truck drivers are thinking right about now.
This, and the "use all memory" bug are the reasons I don't use Chrome. At least with Firefox I can (1) close non-essential tabs, (2) shut it down, (3) reload it and get reasonable memory usage.
Using all memory, with nothing but Netflix player running, is supremely uncool of Chrome.
So, my browser pair is Firefox and Opera...
Ahem, major memory use issues in Chrome...
The browser will use all of computer's memory. Forcing a shutdown of Chrome eventually, or total dog performance. Tons of people having this issue and clogging up the forums. I'm just telling Chrome users to do a full shutdown once a day, but this is hardly a solution.
I submitted a story about this but...oh, shiney!
Then you must really like Windows 8. Boots twice as fast as Windows 7.x and earlier. I left W8 on my laptop for exactly this reason. My desktops run 7 because I rarely reboot them.
I go when my deal site says BestBuy has the best deal on the item I need at that moment. Many retailers dabble (loss leaders) in areas they are not normally competitive in. The deal sites pick up on this, and people like myself benefit.
I see your 900 TB and raise you to 2 freaking petabytes. Not quite a min raise, I realize...
Makes one wonder if his "sales of share to BBC" deal involved him staying for at least 12 months. Would be good business sense from the BBC's point of view.
Not only inelegant, but dangerous...to a non-Japanese country.
If the entirety of Japan can rebuff a giant wave, then that wave must slosh back in the other direction (instead of being dissipated by land).
So, who is responsible for such "bounce" waves?
By contracting out, you get people who actually want to do good work for reasonable pay. Unlike union workers, or "set for life" big company employees.
Where I live the city has contracted out extensive sewer work. These contract workers are superb. You wouldn't see one-quarter of this efficiency with a union city crew. Everyone, including the city (and the city union bosses!), knows this.
Nice troll.
The clean up we are actually talking about would be measured in micrograms.
There is nothing "potentially life-saving" about "clean up on aisle two".
Nice try.
Drinking is drinking. It is physically and psychologically addictive, whether from regular "light" embibing or binge drinking.
Those "wonderfully reasonable" French are probably ALL addicted. They would suffer, especially physically, if they tried to stop.
My father was a "reasonable" drinker. Glass of wine at dinner, and nothing else. I lived with the guy for 17 years, then (after moving out) would visit for summer holidays each year.
I got a chance to watch the problem develop. The man was addicted, and it wasn't a pretty sight. But he never drank more than 2 glasses of wine, and only at a meal.
So, they already had a way. But it was "hard". And now they have another way but it is "less efficient" (i.e. probably costs more). How is any of this news?
The destruction of a chemical weapon is rather trivial, when you can conveniantly dunk the toxin in a vat of acid, or base, or solvent or whatever. Dioxins burn really well, for example.
The sticky bit is stopping it from entering people via their skin or lungs, eyes, etc. when the toxin is already dispersed.
In short, this wonderful new compound is utterly useless.
Thank you. Not sure how that meshes with people drinking wheat grass juice -- having seen it grown, when the shoots are young, they look exactly like wild grass.
This WebMD page suggests a few reasons, including "One published study reports on a miniature poodle that ate grass and then vomited every day for seven years. Three days after putting the dog on a high-fiber diet, the owner reported that the dog stopped eating grass entirely."
This WebMD page says that "dogs today seek out plants as an alternative food source. Most commonly the plant is grass". It goes on to say: "A dog will seek out a natural remedy for a gassy or upset stomach, and grass, it seems, may do the trick. When ingested, the grass blade tickles the throat and stomach lining; this sensation, in turn, may cause the dog to vomit, especially if the grass is gulped down rather than chewed."
"Although dogs don't typically graze on large amounts of grass like a cow, they may nibble on grass, chew on it for a while, and not throw up (an unwell dog will tend to gulp the grass down in big bites and then throw up).
This seems much more like why my dog eats (or bites at) grass.
"Whatever the reason may be, most experts see no danger in letting your dog eat grass. In fact, grass contains essential nutrients that a dog might crave, especially if they're on a commercial diet."
It seems to me that humans don't know why dogs do it. But that it is good for dogs. And no, I've never seen my dogs "drunk" from grass eating.
Just noticed that Wired published this story today: Big Data: One Thing to Think About When Buying Your Apple Watch.
So I guess Wired is paranoid as well.
If symptoms persist, take one.
...
If symptoms persist, take one-half.
If symptoms persist, take one-quarter.
By the way, has anyone seen what dogs do with grass? Ok, it varies a bit by dog. Some eat grass (and throw it up later) while others simply bite at the grass (swallowing little or none and not throwing it up later).
The point is, why do they do it?
I postulate, with the second category of dog, that they are getting a hint, an "essence of grass", and using that as an intentional "almost at homeopathic levels" treatment.
Our dog memorizes where the grass patches are and will want to head down certain blocks just to get to that grass.
BTW, regular lawn grass doesn't work and they will shun it. The best grass is "weed" grass that grows wildly, is longer than lawn grass and the best of the best has a wide blade -- the grass is several times wider than lawn grass.
No.
Sixty percent of [the country's 3M) problem drinkers are salaried businessmen who claim that getting drunk with clients or coworkers is part of their job and a mark of company loyalty.
Yes, I am unapologetically paranoid.
As to your point, have a look at the ratio of data to programs on your hard drive. Not counting audio/video, data size is microscopic compared to program size.
The amount of data the *could* be collected is related to the features on the iWatch, both today's and any future version. Thin edge of the wedge and all that.
Well, the point about physical access is that it ensures that no one can hack the interface *without* having to force open the phone first.
If Apple replaces the battery, is it not possible for them to harvest information that the watch has retained without the user knowing about it?
When two theories are available and both are compatible with the facts, then there are no other criteria to prefer one over the other except the intuition of the researcher. So one can understand why intelligent scientists, cognizant both of theories and of facts, can still be passionate adherents of opposing theories.
- Albert Einstein
In short, one has to provide reasons why their way is better, and many are not interested in doing that.
So the extra hair turned out to be a comb over, not a toupee.
Run Ghostery to block the trackers despite enabled Javascript...
Gorgeous, and frustrated, chicks. Chicks who just wanna go have a beer.