For example, the sole reason of this word being in the title, because it evokes modern usage of "piracy" as incredibly stupid but accepted word for "copyright violation".
Obviously, when you are using a radio frequency without paying for it, you are actually taking somebody's resource: nobody else can use this band in that area.
Modern copyright infringement does nothing of that sort.
No. Adam Driver is not a bad actor. Star Wars is idiotic from the get go. It's an idiotic juvenile shitstory that got randomly selected to reach the level of positive feedback "cult" status that only needs shitty producers to invest.
Every cinephile worth his salt would like to stay away from bullshit like Star Wars, Marvel Universe and other bullcrap lo-end sci-fi crap. And if they had to write critics of these it's only for money.
The actor who fit perfectly into Paterson did it for money. You got shitty result because pearls do not come from shit.
That's all. We should start a national campaign of vandalizing this bullshit good-driver tax.
It's very well known that all the speed controlling devices are located in the areas where people are most likely to speed and people are most likely to speed in the areas where it is the SAFEST to speed.
The parkway with a healthy forest devider three lane on each side that has typically 50 mph limit in California is getting a 35 mph speed trap for no reason but to rob the drivers.
Vandalize them. Destroy them. A la guerre comme a la guerre.
People do not get that fundamental physics is over (you would not call seriously "string theory" "scientific" would you?).
I know I am repeating what Lord Kelvin said to his embarrassment just before great discoveries in relativistic physics, quantum physics, etc.
Nevertheless, that's truth: everything ends, everything has limits, humanity has limits and science has limits.
The clear indication that we are close to the limit is absence of ANY fundamental discoveries since a long time ago.
We are gradually shifting towards applied science and mere technology. All of three fields, basic science, applied science and technology are essential for humanity, but the fact is that the first one is almost over or probably over already.
Call them for what they are: Nobel Prizes in Technology
Slashdot Mirror
For example, the sole reason of this word being in the title, because it evokes modern usage of "piracy" as incredibly stupid but accepted word for "copyright violation".
Obviously, when you are using a radio frequency without paying for it, you are actually taking somebody's resource: nobody else can use this band in that area.
Modern copyright infringement does nothing of that sort.
Result: confusion, obfuscation, disinformation, propaganda.
What is really new in this study? How does it compare to previous studies? Are previous studies wrong? Did they discover new facts?
On the subjecr of environment they try to present themselves as valid climate change fighting players. With one hand....
It's started to be called "climate change" instead of "warming" for a reason
>unionized developers
As long as more developers needed there will be no union. There is only quantum vacuum level of unemployment among software developers.
People are talking about data entry. Data entry is not coding.
This is non existent problem
It does not take much for people to argue. The problem is that people argue about crap like Star Wars.
You had me until this:
> Adam Driver is a bad actor
No. Adam Driver is not a bad actor. Star Wars is idiotic from the get go. It's an idiotic juvenile shitstory that got randomly selected to reach the level of positive feedback "cult" status that only needs shitty producers to invest.
Every cinephile worth his salt would like to stay away from bullshit like Star Wars, Marvel Universe and other bullcrap lo-end sci-fi crap. And if they had to write critics of these it's only for money.
The actor who fit perfectly into Paterson did it for money. You got shitty result because pearls do not come from shit.
You do not know what science is. Science is not to answer ANY questions.
>Those "speed traps" you don't understand
No. YOU do not understand, dimwit. You are talking out of your fat ass.
>I would assume I would be on camera as I approached it, even if I sneaked up behind it.
Shield and sword never ends, Not a reason to give up.
It's a robbery, plain and simple.
None of the problems you mentioned have a clear experimental path to verifiability
ambiguous
The term you are looking for is "pun intended".
Another Arab said 1400 years ago:
That Arab's name was Muhammad, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam and this saying is recorded in Sahih Bukhari
Than current equally portable small mounted photocameras, sometimes well hidden besides other large roadside objects.
I do not care about privacy. I can make my Google Maps history public right now.
What I care is when this information will be used to rob me by local government in the form of bullshit road fines.
Right. Because private ownership would be so much better. You are an idiot. And the mod who upvoted you is an idiot as well.
Roads are natural monopolies. You do not have a choice on which road to take really. Do you ever see two parallel roads?
Die
That's all. We should start a national campaign of vandalizing this bullshit good-driver tax.
It's very well known that all the speed controlling devices are located in the areas where people are most likely to speed and people are most likely to speed in the areas where it is the SAFEST to speed.
The parkway with a healthy forest devider three lane on each side that has typically 50 mph limit in California is getting a 35 mph speed trap for no reason but to rob the drivers.
Vandalize them. Destroy them. A la guerre comme a la guerre.
>We have so much left to learn that we are nowhere near hitting the limits of what science can discover.
Empty declarations.
You are an imbecile
You can't know everything. Science is about _repeatable_ phenomena. There is vast areas in existing world where they are not repeatable.
There should be a moderation flair called "Dumbass" for shitposters like you.
Yes. The goals contradict each other
It's a mixture of virtue signalling, propaganda, and genuine wish to encourage women to participate in really hard work of being a scientist.
People do not get that fundamental physics is over (you would not call seriously "string theory" "scientific" would you?).
I know I am repeating what Lord Kelvin said to his embarrassment just before great discoveries in relativistic physics, quantum physics, etc.
Nevertheless, that's truth: everything ends, everything has limits, humanity has limits and science has limits.
The clear indication that we are close to the limit is absence of ANY fundamental discoveries since a long time ago.
We are gradually shifting towards applied science and mere technology. All of three fields, basic science, applied science and technology are essential for humanity, but the fact is that the first one is almost over or probably over already.
Call them for what they are: Nobel Prizes in Technology