The professor, as well as the author of the textbook we used, were very adamant about telling us that sexual addiction is not real. It is not scientific, it is used by those crazy conservative christians (aliteration pun intended...) to scare everyone and control them.
But somehow I don't believe him, I have heard of people who have ruined their marriage by becoming addicted to pr0n, some have been fired for looking at pr0n while at work.
Porn addiction isn't sexual addiction. It's porn addiction. Most vertebrates are "addicted" to sex itself -- that's what makes them/us so prolific.
__If you read the article__ you will also note how IBM sends customer complaints to the OpenSSH team.
PFY: "Shit, this multi-million-dollar client is fuming mad! How do I appease them?"
BOFH: "Send them to the rudest prick you can think of, of course."
****
In all seriosity, that's pretty disgusting. I'd have some choice words for the IBM, and their client in question (to send the message home to IBM) if I were in that situation.
..all you jokesters making fun of the "innovative" change of moving the categories to the left. And you're right, it's not revolutionary, but evolutionary.
But I feel the need to point out that it's an excellent move (IMO) BECAUSE it's evolutionary. Look at the ridiculous mess that is http://www.msn.com/, with all its ads and news articles and links to other MSN resources [1]. Then consider http://www.google.com/. It has the word "Google" (sometimes themed for a given holiday), a search bar, the a "search" button, all smack in the middle. Everything else is in small standard or linked text.
It's a testament to elegantly simple design. The claw hammer, the Volkswagen Beetle, the Colt M1911A1.45 ACP, Google.... all these things are great because they're dirt simple and do exactly what they were designed to do with no cruft.
I just had to say it.
-Glee
[1] Notice that search.msn.com itself has been cleaned up to look almost exactly like Google.
I may be a lightweight bastard, but I cannot eat a single habanero without violently vomiting.
400 mg [per week --ed] of Capsaicin is basically like eating pepper spray.
You're a lightweight, but not a bastard (that I can tell). With appropriate meals (ie. not vanilla ice cream) I will easily consume the equivalent of 2 or 3 habanero peppers in one sitting. Not that I'm bragging, or that it makes me better than you, but I just wanted to point out that such a level of consumption is humanly possible for those accustomed to it.
It was a British fleet that burned Washington, not Canadian.
Actually, the fleet didn't do any burning. It was the soldiers who did the burning. British and Canadian soldiers. Oops.
Not that that's really an insult anyways. With very few exceptions, Canada and Britain have always been good friends. I just wanted to correct your mistake.
Also, remember, before Washington was burned, we burned Toronto to the ground, and we'll do it again if y'all aren't careful.
So, being the terrorist aggressors and then getting smacked down in kind improves your situation.... how, precisely? You thought you could come up here and torch what you like, and we came down there and kicked your asses for it. Isn't payback a bitch.
Slashdot Mirror
The professor, as well as the author of the textbook we used, were very adamant about telling us that sexual addiction is not real. It is not scientific, it is used by those crazy conservative christians (aliteration pun intended...) to scare everyone and control them.
But somehow I don't believe him, I have heard of people who have ruined their marriage by becoming addicted to pr0n, some have been fired for looking at pr0n while at work.
Porn addiction isn't sexual addiction. It's porn addiction. Most vertebrates are "addicted" to sex itself -- that's what makes them/us so prolific.
-Gleedancing, getting drunk, and having random unprotected sex like the average university student -- not exactly my cup of tea.
I know exactly what you mean. I can't stand having fun and banging random nubile, bi-curious university-aged chicks.
-Glee__If you read the article__ you will also note how IBM sends customer complaints to the OpenSSH team.
PFY: "Shit, this multi-million-dollar client is fuming mad! How do I appease them?"
****BOFH: "Send them to the rudest prick you can think of, of course."
In all seriosity, that's pretty disgusting. I'd have some choice words for the IBM, and their client in question (to send the message home to IBM) if I were in that situation.
-Glee..all you jokesters making fun of the "innovative" change of moving the categories to the left. And you're right, it's not revolutionary, but evolutionary.
.45 ACP, Google.... all these things are great because they're dirt simple and do exactly what they were designed to do with no cruft.
But I feel the need to point out that it's an excellent move (IMO) BECAUSE it's evolutionary. Look at the ridiculous mess that is http://www.msn.com/, with all its ads and news articles and links to other MSN resources [1]. Then consider http://www.google.com/. It has the word "Google" (sometimes themed for a given holiday), a search bar, the a "search" button, all smack in the middle. Everything else is in small standard or linked text.
It's a testament to elegantly simple design. The claw hammer, the Volkswagen Beetle, the Colt M1911A1
I just had to say it.
-Glee
[1] Notice that search.msn.com itself has been cleaned up to look almost exactly like Google.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Engineering_Acoustics /Car_Mufflers
One down, three to go.
-Glee
I may be a lightweight bastard, but I cannot eat a single habanero without violently vomiting. 400 mg [per week --ed] of Capsaicin is basically like eating pepper spray.
You're a lightweight, but not a bastard (that I can tell). With appropriate meals (ie. not vanilla ice cream) I will easily consume the equivalent of 2 or 3 habanero peppers in one sitting. Not that I'm bragging, or that it makes me better than you, but I just wanted to point out that such a level of consumption is humanly possible for those accustomed to it.
-GleeIt was a British fleet that burned Washington, not Canadian.
;)
Actually, the fleet didn't do any burning. It was the soldiers who did the burning. British and Canadian soldiers. Oops.
Not that that's really an insult anyways. With very few exceptions, Canada and Britain have always been good friends. I just wanted to correct your mistake.
Also, remember, before Washington was burned, we burned Toronto to the ground, and we'll do it again if y'all aren't careful.
So, being the terrorist aggressors and then getting smacked down in kind improves your situation.... how, precisely? You thought you could come up here and torch what you like, and we came down there and kicked your asses for it. Isn't payback a bitch.
By all means, try it again
-Glee