People still steal car radios? Even the stock manufacturer fitted ones? Crikey.
I find I sometimes want music or the radio for distraction. If I get bored while driving I'm more likely to take unnecessary risks. If I'm enjoying my drive I'm more sedate.
Plane: We're talking about commuting here. And good luck getting on a plane nowadays as an adult without a license.
I've never used my driving license as ID for boarding an aircraft. Other forms of identification are available. Do you really think that people that don't drive also never fly??
Trains can take you between towns, not just across them. Snow does not preclude bike riding.
Other than for commuting, taxis are cost-competitive to car ownership in the UK. They're frequently less convenient, but not more expensive, especially if you live in an urban location that lets you use public transport for a proportion of your journeys.
I appreciate you're playing devil's advocate but the barriers to not owning a car aren't insurmountable, even in the US. As someone else in the thread suggests, learn to drive safely or move to New York.
You mean like the one I use on my PC? I call it a controller, but that's because I perceive a gamepad to have no analog thumbsticks.
It's the joy of a PC. I can use keyboard and mouse for strategy, FPS and RPG games (online / MMO / offline or otherwise), use HOTAS for flight/space sims, use a wheel or a controller for driving games and just use the mouse for Hexcells.
Or combine options. For Saints Row III the keyboard and mouse gives me the control and precision I want for moving around on foot, then switch to the controller when I'm in a car or aircraft.
But then, I've been using peripheral controllers of various forms for gaming with keyboard based programmable computers since before they came with a mouse...
I practically begged a friend to get a 970 on the PC he bought a week ago. Their pricing was so aggressive that as soon as you went within £40 of it the performance uplift was just too appealing to turn down. You get a PC that'll play new release games beautifully at 1920x1080 for another 4-5 years instead of just 2-3.
I gave up and went 16:9. I cheated though; I didn't drop to 1080 height, I switched to 2560x1440.
The aspect ratio is less important to me than having good vertical resolution. This way I get more vertical than 1920x1200 and the bonus of a few extra pixels on the sides too.
A legit complaint I can see is 2GB of memory. Modern games are starting to crave lots of memory. I suspect Nvidia may be gating that feature in higher tier SKUs, or maybe we'll see 4GB cards not long after launch.
That's the bit that confuses and disappoints me. The consoles seem to be expecting 3GB of graphics RAM so it feels pretty asinine to release a PC card with only 2GB. Surely matching console performance in a midrange PC is a fairly basic expectation?
Nah, it means that Nvidia offer a range of graphics cards for gaming, and this one is not "cheap and nasty" and it's not "top end". It's sort of near the middle of the range.
Yeah, any card released in the last five years should be awesome for games released before 2005, so if those are the games you want to play then save your money and see how the onboard graphics cope with them before even buying a dedicated graphics card.
My year old graphics card is still coping fine with games released in the past few months at full detail and 2560x1440, so that gives you an idea of how far ahead of the current game demands the graphics cards are. 1920x1080 gaming is comparatively extremely cheap these days.
Being able to hear an approaching vehicle is not just a safety issue for blind people, it is an issue for anyone who is trying to cross a road and can't see approaching cars.
When crossing the road, can you hear the fake engine noise being played to the driver of a Mustang?
No.
Now fuck off and stop mandating that we all have to put up with unnecessary noise because you don't know how to fucking cross a road safely.
Then there's the software engineer, who is lazy at heart. This means that if there's a working implementation that does what's needed, they'd like to re-use it.
They can then spend their time building new and interesting capabilities to supplement the already working code. The world advances.
Seems better than reinventing the wheel each project.
Yeah, I'm still distraught that Project Gotham Racing II never reached the PC. I'd still play it now. In fact, I need to play it now - I need to learn the Nurburgring before I take a V8 Jaguar around there later this year.
I think it's good that multiple gaming styles are accommodated in the market place, I just get frustrated when people that only play games on consoles claim that it's all you could ever need.
Slashdot Mirror
Well said, and I quite agree. A picture of an erect penis never hurt anybody, and a picture of some dead twat shouldn't either.
Well, you're fucked if MS switch off GFWL, the rumour of which is the main reason so many games have been patched to remove it.
Ass Creed Black Flag has had a lot of compliments from people with no reason to promote Ubisoft games and no great loyalty to the series.
As someone still looking for a modern equivalent to Sea Dogs the only reason I haven't tried it is Ubisoft and Uplay.
Ok, so it's conspiracy to commit fraud.
Happier now?
No, never.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
http://www.instructables.com/i...
Oh.
You think that trumps the Sale of Goods Act, distance selling regulations or other UK consumer protections?
No, steering with your feet while juggling angry cats blindfolded is not explicitly on the list
I can confirm through painful first-hand experience that the word 'angry' is entirely superfluous in that context.
People still steal car radios? Even the stock manufacturer fitted ones? Crikey.
I find I sometimes want music or the radio for distraction. If I get bored while driving I'm more likely to take unnecessary risks. If I'm enjoying my drive I'm more sedate.
So your answer is what? Destroy the quality of life for people in San Francisco?
I'd fucking love the US urban sprawl here in the UK. It would mean we had the masses of land available to spawl over.
More relevantly, it's not a felony to not drive without a licence. Sadly this seems to be an option many people are ignoring.
Plane: We're talking about commuting here. And good luck getting on a plane nowadays as an adult without a license.
I've never used my driving license as ID for boarding an aircraft. Other forms of identification are available. Do you really think that people that don't drive also never fly??
Trains can take you between towns, not just across them.
Snow does not preclude bike riding.
Other than for commuting, taxis are cost-competitive to car ownership in the UK. They're frequently less convenient, but not more expensive, especially if you live in an urban location that lets you use public transport for a proportion of your journeys.
I appreciate you're playing devil's advocate but the barriers to not owning a car aren't insurmountable, even in the US. As someone else in the thread suggests, learn to drive safely or move to New York.
"Driving is a privilege" is not an excuse to penalise people unfairly for non-driving related matters such as child support.
The importance of driving for an inclusive social life and employment is not an excuse for dangerous driving.
You mean like the one I use on my PC? I call it a controller, but that's because I perceive a gamepad to have no analog thumbsticks.
It's the joy of a PC. I can use keyboard and mouse for strategy, FPS and RPG games (online / MMO / offline or otherwise), use HOTAS for flight/space sims, use a wheel or a controller for driving games and just use the mouse for Hexcells.
Or combine options. For Saints Row III the keyboard and mouse gives me the control and precision I want for moving around on foot, then switch to the controller when I'm in a car or aircraft.
But then, I've been using peripheral controllers of various forms for gaming with keyboard based programmable computers since before they came with a mouse...
I practically begged a friend to get a 970 on the PC he bought a week ago. Their pricing was so aggressive that as soon as you went within £40 of it the performance uplift was just too appealing to turn down. You get a PC that'll play new release games beautifully at 1920x1080 for another 4-5 years instead of just 2-3.
I gave up and went 16:9. I cheated though; I didn't drop to 1080 height, I switched to 2560x1440.
The aspect ratio is less important to me than having good vertical resolution. This way I get more vertical than 1920x1200 and the bonus of a few extra pixels on the sides too.
A legit complaint I can see is 2GB of memory. Modern games are starting to crave lots of memory. I suspect Nvidia may be gating that feature in higher tier SKUs, or maybe we'll see 4GB cards not long after launch.
That's the bit that confuses and disappoints me. The consoles seem to be expecting 3GB of graphics RAM so it feels pretty asinine to release a PC card with only 2GB. Surely matching console performance in a midrange PC is a fairly basic expectation?
Nah, it means that Nvidia offer a range of graphics cards for gaming, and this one is not "cheap and nasty" and it's not "top end". It's sort of near the middle of the range.
Yeah, any card released in the last five years should be awesome for games released before 2005, so if those are the games you want to play then save your money and see how the onboard graphics cope with them before even buying a dedicated graphics card.
My year old graphics card is still coping fine with games released in the past few months at full detail and 2560x1440, so that gives you an idea of how far ahead of the current game demands the graphics cards are. 1920x1080 gaming is comparatively extremely cheap these days.
You forgot to mention: They spend a higher percentage of their time on the road in urban areas, where the pedestrians and cyclists are.
Being able to hear an approaching vehicle is not just a safety issue for blind people, it is an issue for anyone who is trying to cross a road and can't see approaching cars.
When crossing the road, can you hear the fake engine noise being played to the driver of a Mustang?
No.
Now fuck off and stop mandating that we all have to put up with unnecessary noise because you don't know how to fucking cross a road safely.
Then there's the software engineer, who is lazy at heart. This means that if there's a working implementation that does what's needed, they'd like to re-use it.
They can then spend their time building new and interesting capabilities to supplement the already working code. The world advances.
Seems better than reinventing the wheel each project.
Yeah, I'm still distraught that Project Gotham Racing II never reached the PC. I'd still play it now. In fact, I need to play it now - I need to learn the Nurburgring before I take a V8 Jaguar around there later this year.
I think it's good that multiple gaming styles are accommodated in the market place, I just get frustrated when people that only play games on consoles claim that it's all you could ever need.
Anybody discounting PHP based solutions based on them being based on PHP doesn't have an opinion I want to base my decisions on.
I sometimes wonder what I would have done if I found out my kid was a bully.
Hopefully tried to understand why.
I was a bully at school. Nearly as much as I was bullied. I could blame Aspergers but there were a number of other factors.
Could those have been addressed? No idea. It was great when I reached university though and all that shit went away.
Only the good ones.
There's a reason there's a two-tier university system in the UK. I suspect the US is pretty similar.