At any given speed I would rather be in a smaller more maneuverable car.
However, the stats suggest that drivers of cheap SUVs die less than drivers of cheap saloon cars: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topic... (Drivers of luxury cars are pretty safe, whatever their vehicle style).
Although to be fair, boiling or steaming cabbage and carrots then adding them to mashed potato and a good boiled gammon is a meal I'll never tire of eating.
If they're not in the UK then they're not fucking workers in the UK. You introduced these EU citizens that aren't already working in the UK, don't go into denial now your shit has been called out.
You're somewhere in the neighbourhood of ten times safer from violent death if you're in almost any part of the US than if you're in the wrong part of Paris on a Friday evening.
Where the fuck does that 12 billion figure come from? It will not cost 12 billion pounds a year to replace functions costing currently only £620m - especially when some of them don't need replacing.
I'm getting the feeling I'm getting a bargain on my cleaner.
She comes in for 90 minutes every week (but only does half the house each week) and I'm paying her £11/hour.
It's all on the books, but it's her books not mine. She runs her own company, I merely hire her services. She has right of substitution too (although we never discussed that) which means I've had her husband, her son and her daughter in cleaning at various times.
There's nothing wrong about a 14 year old girl in school uniform cleaning your house for you. Honest.
Right now voice recognition can't even accurately capture what I say, not a fucking hope it'll also be able to translate it to another language.
Example - the above sentence captured using MS speech recognition:
By now voice recognition come even actually capture what I say was that England can also be able to translate into another language
..and in Google Docs:
Right Now voice recognition can't even accurately capture what I say and I f****** hope it also go to translate it to another language
(yeah, Google add the *s)
Google's getting close, although it struggles a lot more at times, but even that is going to sound garbled as fuck when translated - and that's with a quality microphone and a silent room, no background noise, no other people speaking, no traffic, no shitty phone microphone.
That's a very long rant to merely suggest that the UK parliament can not compel Zuckerberg and that he's within his rights to decline their polite request.
Which is entirely the case.
The UK offers very few protections - they recently imprisoned a young American woman when she stepped onto their soil because she was going there to interview some anti-Muslim European and they decided that made her a public danger
She was detained, not imprisoned. To be fair the distinction may feel technical when your freedom is curtailed, but it's an important one.
no hint of where this rule goes when Muslim Jihadists arrive in London and hop onto a soap box in the park to loudly proclaim their intentions to kill or convert all to Islam
Tell that to the many people in UK prisons for providing support to terrorist groups and organisations.
Neither of which apply in the USA where Facebook is based
Both of which however apply in the UK, where British users of Facebook are based, where Facebook does business, and where Facebook's data has been reported to be used illegally to influence electoral outcomes.
what's happening is that UK citizens are choosing to log on to an American company's web site rather than an American company forcing its way into the UK and onto the computers of citizens of the UK
I don't have a Facebook account and have never given them my details. Facebook nonetheless has at least one of my email addresses, my telephone number and other information about me. Until May, when GDPR kicks in and I invite them to delete everything or start paying me several thousand pounds a month.
Until Britain leaves, it's a nation state the EU would take seriously.
Even then - G8 member, UN security council permanent member, one of the leads of NATO, head of the Commonwealth and currently demonstrating its diplomatic power through the response to a nerve agent attack.
They don't. It would be an order if Zuckerberg was a UK citizen living in the UK but as a foreign national in another country the request becomes merely a request.
Optional for him to attend, and highly anticipated that he would choose not to.
They can't impose measures against his company either, without referring to an existing authorised body (ICO maybe?) or passing new legislation.
Hmm, no. If Google want to upset Larry then forget the database, they're already hitting those sales through their development of non relational DBs.
Where Google could scare Oracle senseless is putting in place viable alternatives to the whole Oracle applications stack. Oracle made a lot of technology purchases (e.g. Sun and BEA) but its primary growth strategy has been buying application and cloud service vendors, like Siebel, Taleo, Eloqua and Hyperion. Offer alternatives to those and you hammer their recurring licence fees (and also hit Oracle DB sales).
I'm almost certain they were matching cameras from the ATM and the cameras on the transit refill and they knew exactly who it was
Paranoia much? No, that would require them to notice that there was a card being used cash only, care, trace where it was being topped up then correlate that to ATM usage. If they wanted to use camera footage to confirm that's a whole additional load of hassle.
Sure, it's possible, but unless use of that card was tied to serious crime they're just not going to bother.
Oh please. Rotherham, Oxford, Telford.. the police are repeatedly scared to even record the crimes let alone investigate them for fear of being accused of racism.
It's been a fucking terrible miscarriage of justice and took too many years for prosecutions to take place. Yes, some have now happened but don't pretend it shouldn't have happened much much quicker.
Slashdot Mirror
At any given speed I would rather be in a smaller more maneuverable car.
However, the stats suggest that drivers of cheap SUVs die less than drivers of cheap saloon cars: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topic...
(Drivers of luxury cars are pretty safe, whatever their vehicle style).
Although to be fair, boiling or steaming cabbage and carrots then adding them to mashed potato and a good boiled gammon is a meal I'll never tire of eating.
If they're not in the UK then they're not fucking workers in the UK. You introduced these EU citizens that aren't already working in the UK, don't go into denial now your shit has been called out.
I did read something that suggested roasting longer breaks down the acrylamide that the light roasting created.
Starbucks doesn't use cheap beans. They're not making enough profit to be using cheap beans _and_ charging those prices.
Costa on the other hand..
You're somewhere in the neighbourhood of ten times safer from violent death if you're in almost any part of the US than if you're in the wrong part of Paris on a Friday evening.
Write to Richard Reid and ask him.
Where the fuck does that 12 billion figure come from? It will not cost 12 billion pounds a year to replace functions costing currently only £620m - especially when some of them don't need replacing.
See http://www.fieldfisher.com/med...
You forget who paid for the fucking stadium, bought half the players and has to subsidise ticket prices for the fans.
The UK owns a substantial part of that EU private property.
EU citizens not in the UK will be unable to enter the UK without a UK visa
EU citizens will not require a visa to enter the UK during or after the transition period. Don't be silly.
Given the EU is not a country surely the correct response is to revoke the .eu ccTLD.
Of course, the EU wanted the .eu domain because it wants to be a country, and that's a massive factor in the UK choosing to leave.
I'm getting the feeling I'm getting a bargain on my cleaner.
She comes in for 90 minutes every week (but only does half the house each week) and I'm paying her £11/hour.
It's all on the books, but it's her books not mine. She runs her own company, I merely hire her services. She has right of substitution too (although we never discussed that) which means I've had her husband, her son and her daughter in cleaning at various times.
There's nothing wrong about a 14 year old girl in school uniform cleaning your house for you. Honest.
Right now voice recognition can't even accurately capture what I say, not a fucking hope it'll also be able to translate it to another language.
Example - the above sentence captured using MS speech recognition:
By now voice recognition come even actually capture what I say was that England can also be able to translate into another language
..and in Google Docs:
Right Now voice recognition can't even accurately capture what I say and I f****** hope it also go to translate it to another language
(yeah, Google add the *s)
Google's getting close, although it struggles a lot more at times, but even that is going to sound garbled as fuck when translated - and that's with a quality microphone and a silent room, no background noise, no other people speaking, no traffic, no shitty phone microphone.
That's a very long rant to merely suggest that the UK parliament can not compel Zuckerberg and that he's within his rights to decline their polite request.
Which is entirely the case.
The UK offers very few protections - they recently imprisoned a young American woman when she stepped onto their soil because she was going there to interview some anti-Muslim European and they decided that made her a public danger
She was detained, not imprisoned. To be fair the distinction may feel technical when your freedom is curtailed, but it's an important one.
no hint of where this rule goes when Muslim Jihadists arrive in London and hop onto a soap box in the park to loudly proclaim their intentions to kill or convert all to Islam
Tell that to the many people in UK prisons for providing support to terrorist groups and organisations.
Neither of which apply in the USA where Facebook is based
Both of which however apply in the UK, where British users of Facebook are based, where Facebook does business, and where Facebook's data has been reported to be used illegally to influence electoral outcomes.
what's happening is that UK citizens are choosing to log on to an American company's web site rather than an American company forcing its way into the UK and onto the computers of citizens of the UK
I don't have a Facebook account and have never given them my details. Facebook nonetheless has at least one of my email addresses, my telephone number and other information about me. Until May, when GDPR kicks in and I invite them to delete everything or start paying me several thousand pounds a month.
Until Britain leaves, it's a nation state the EU would take seriously.
Even then - G8 member, UN security council permanent member, one of the leads of NATO, head of the Commonwealth and currently demonstrating its diplomatic power through the response to a nerve agent attack.
They don't. It would be an order if Zuckerberg was a UK citizen living in the UK but as a foreign national in another country the request becomes merely a request.
Optional for him to attend, and highly anticipated that he would choose not to.
They can't impose measures against his company either, without referring to an existing authorised body (ICO maybe?) or passing new legislation.
the UK and other parliamentary governments are only bound by custom and a general desire to behave well
Well, that and civil unrest.
Bring back the poll tax I say, council tax penalises people that want to live alone.
No, he's referring to this stupidity:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/...
erm. Scotland is in the UK, so its legal system is indeed a UK legal system.
Unless you're suggesting that the legal system of England and Wales is also the UK one? That'll upset our Celtic friends.
Hmm, no. If Google want to upset Larry then forget the database, they're already hitting those sales through their development of non relational DBs.
Where Google could scare Oracle senseless is putting in place viable alternatives to the whole Oracle applications stack. Oracle made a lot of technology purchases (e.g. Sun and BEA) but its primary growth strategy has been buying application and cloud service vendors, like Siebel, Taleo, Eloqua and Hyperion. Offer alternatives to those and you hammer their recurring licence fees (and also hit Oracle DB sales).
I've worked in the finance industry for over 20 years and nobody uses MM for millions.
the story goes something along the lines of a guy walked from Greece to Egypt
He went for a 2300km walk? Instead of just taking a fucking boat?
I'm almost certain they were matching cameras from the ATM and the cameras on the transit refill and they knew exactly who it was
Paranoia much? No, that would require them to notice that there was a card being used cash only, care, trace where it was being topped up then correlate that to ATM usage. If they wanted to use camera footage to confirm that's a whole additional load of hassle.
Sure, it's possible, but unless use of that card was tied to serious crime they're just not going to bother.
Australia has a horrific past for human rights, especially if you're born black and native.
Even now they're terribly nanny state and I wouldn't be surprised to find out there continue to be dodgy policies that just aren't being made public.
Oh please. Rotherham, Oxford, Telford.. the police are repeatedly scared to even record the crimes let alone investigate them for fear of being accused of racism.
It's been a fucking terrible miscarriage of justice and took too many years for prosecutions to take place. Yes, some have now happened but don't pretend it shouldn't have happened much much quicker.