Yup. Except this never happens in the real world. And no one at that level is completely "unemployable". Many high profile CEOs have done shitty jobs, and yet they were still able to find shitty jobs after they left.
You're assuming 1). That they are perfectly rational, or even slightly rational, and 2). You're assuming that they give a shit. If the company fails, they'll lay low for a while, perhaps take a small vacation, and then go down the street and get another job doing exactly the same.
I will never understand people who keep bitching and moaning about government, and yet, still continue to live here and enjoy all the benefits and privileges that we get from our government.
and then 5 minutes later rail against the corporations and how they can not be trusted to take care of their employees/customers/factory environment.
Ahh yes, the retarded argument that "corporations and government are the same!" Completely disregarding the fact that I have a say in how government is run. I don't have a say in how the company is run. And that companies have far more power than I do.
There's the anti-science movement, and a lot of the shitbags peddling this filth are also heavily into homeopathic medicine and other "natural" bullshit.
Good god, you are a fucking moron, aren't you? Why don't you learn how vaccinations and herd immunity work, before spouting your dangerous and ignorant trash?
If the students/teachers are already vaccinated, then they have nothing to fear from unvaccinated kids. The students/teachers are immune from those deadly diseases.
Not everyone who gets the vaccine will develop resistance to the point where they would be immune. When surrounded by people who have developed immunity, however, it doesn't really matter, as this percentage is fairly small, and the bug has an extremely difficult time getting a foothold enough to infect people. Thus, those who don't develop the immunity themselves are protected by herd immunity. However, if you add in a bunch of unvaccinated people who are unvaccinated due to their parents being fucking retarded, then there is now a large enough population to where the disease can gain a foothold, and thus start an outbreak. Worse yet, it can be possible for the bug to mutate once inside those people, and it might go after people who had immunity before.
I consider this a "pro-choice" issue just as important as the pro-choice issue of abortion. Or wanting to date a partner of the same sex. Or smoking. It's YOUR body not the government's; they shouldn't have power to block you from lighting a cigarette, or having homosexual relations, or getting an abortion, or exercising the option not to be vaccinated.
No it's not, and you are showing yourself to be extremely ignorant by doing so. NONE OF THOSE OTHER EVENTS (with the exception of smoking, and that's already heavily regulated) HAVE ANY AFFECT ON OTHER PEOPLE.
I do NOT recognize your right to be a retard and put other people at risk. That is NOT freedom; that's self-centered douchebaggery.
I'll remember that the next time someone argues the government should not ban same-sex marriage, or ban abortion
I like how you try to take two unrelated topics, and try to make them appear similar, even though there is nothing related, and the arguments are completely different. You cannot equate same-sex marriage to vaccinations, no matter how hard you try.
I'm not an asshole.
Yeah, you are.
I respect other people's opinions even if I don't agree with them.
So fucking what? You want a cookie?
YOU might want to try that yourself.
Not when their idiotic "opinions" actually lead to the deaths of innocent people. They are retarded, plain and simple, and are unfit to be parents.
Wow, you truly are an idiot, aren't you? No one said anything about forcibly injecting any chemicals. You are engaging in wild speculation that only serves to make you look like a nutcase.
If you're not going to vaccinate, then you should be required to quarantine your children at home. You have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to endanger the life of mine simply because you're a fucking piece of shit.
Here's the problem: If you don't vaccinate, you are not only putting your child at risk, but the children of others.
The only other alternative I can see is that, if you choose not to vaccinate, you don't get to take your child in public. You don't get to use day care facilities, you don't get to enroll them in schools, etc.
If the government can violate an unborn child's right to life
Since when did the government mandate that people have to get abortions? That's never been the case. It's always the person carrying the child making that decision, not the government.
No, I can't agree. You're saying it's ok for them to wait until it's already too late to do something about it, but not ok to take preventative action.
I disagree strongly. This is a HUGE fucking public safety issue. You should not be able to take your child out in public if you declined vaccination because "I don't feel like it."
So this would be the government mandating that you purchase a product from another private seller.
No, it's not. Especially when you consider that many states require you to have car insurance if you drive a car.
You talking about Conscription? Because that is still very much on the books. Why the fuck do you think all males have to register with Selective Service on their 18th birthday?
Slashdot Mirror
I don't get any data signal in my cube.
Just because I'm at work doesn't mean I don't need to communicate.
Otherwise, nobody should be working.
Ok. Then when do the people who work 9-5 go grocery shopping? When do they get their hair cut? When do they go drive go-karts?
Yup. Except this never happens in the real world. And no one at that level is completely "unemployable". Many high profile CEOs have done shitty jobs, and yet they were still able to find shitty jobs after they left.
You're assuming 1). That they are perfectly rational, or even slightly rational, and 2). You're assuming that they give a shit. If the company fails, they'll lay low for a while, perhaps take a small vacation, and then go down the street and get another job doing exactly the same.
Proof needed on that.
And remember, we have say in who these people are. We don't have any say in anything going on in the banks, or in Microsoft.
I will never understand people who keep bitching and moaning about government, and yet, still continue to live here and enjoy all the benefits and privileges that we get from our government.
and then 5 minutes later rail against the corporations and how they can not be trusted to take care of their employees/customers/factory environment.
Ahh yes, the retarded argument that "corporations and government are the same!" Completely disregarding the fact that I have a say in how government is run. I don't have a say in how the company is run. And that companies have far more power than I do.
No, we won't, you pile of shit.
There's the anti-science movement, and a lot of the shitbags peddling this filth are also heavily into homeopathic medicine and other "natural" bullshit.
Too fucking bad. You do NOT have a right to put others at risk.
If you choose not to get your child vaccinated, you should not be able to take them out into public. End of story.
Here's the fucking problem: By being absurdly wrong, they are not only causing harm to their children, but the children of others as well.
Good god, you are a fucking moron, aren't you? Why don't you learn how vaccinations and herd immunity work, before spouting your dangerous and ignorant trash?
If the students/teachers are already vaccinated, then they have nothing to fear from unvaccinated kids. The students/teachers are immune from those deadly diseases.
Not everyone who gets the vaccine will develop resistance to the point where they would be immune. When surrounded by people who have developed immunity, however, it doesn't really matter, as this percentage is fairly small, and the bug has an extremely difficult time getting a foothold enough to infect people. Thus, those who don't develop the immunity themselves are protected by herd immunity. However, if you add in a bunch of unvaccinated people who are unvaccinated due to their parents being fucking retarded, then there is now a large enough population to where the disease can gain a foothold, and thus start an outbreak. Worse yet, it can be possible for the bug to mutate once inside those people, and it might go after people who had immunity before.
I consider this a "pro-choice" issue just as important as the pro-choice issue of abortion. Or wanting to date a partner of the same sex. Or smoking. It's YOUR body not the government's; they shouldn't have power to block you from lighting a cigarette, or having homosexual relations, or getting an abortion, or exercising the option not to be vaccinated.
No it's not, and you are showing yourself to be extremely ignorant by doing so. NONE OF THOSE OTHER EVENTS (with the exception of smoking, and that's already heavily regulated) HAVE ANY AFFECT ON OTHER PEOPLE.
I do NOT recognize your right to be a retard and put other people at risk. That is NOT freedom; that's self-centered douchebaggery.
Yeah, you don't actually have anything backing that up. Stop trolling.
Yes, it's a fucking troll. You're actively defending the ability of others to decide to harm other people.
I'll remember that the next time someone argues the government should not ban same-sex marriage, or ban abortion
I like how you try to take two unrelated topics, and try to make them appear similar, even though there is nothing related, and the arguments are completely different. You cannot equate same-sex marriage to vaccinations, no matter how hard you try.
I'm not an asshole.
Yeah, you are.
I respect other people's opinions even if I don't agree with them.
So fucking what? You want a cookie?
YOU might want to try that yourself.
Not when their idiotic "opinions" actually lead to the deaths of innocent people. They are retarded, plain and simple, and are unfit to be parents.
Wow, you truly are an idiot, aren't you? No one said anything about forcibly injecting any chemicals. You are engaging in wild speculation that only serves to make you look like a nutcase.
If you're not going to vaccinate, then you should be required to quarantine your children at home. You have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to endanger the life of mine simply because you're a fucking piece of shit.
Nope, not in the least. But thanks for being an idiot.
Here's the problem: If you don't vaccinate, you are not only putting your child at risk, but the children of others.
The only other alternative I can see is that, if you choose not to vaccinate, you don't get to take your child in public. You don't get to use day care facilities, you don't get to enroll them in schools, etc.
If the government can violate an unborn child's right to life
Since when did the government mandate that people have to get abortions? That's never been the case. It's always the person carrying the child making that decision, not the government.
Stop being a fucking idiot.
No. This is absolute, fear-mongering bullshit, and you should be ashamed for even thinking it.
No, I can't agree. You're saying it's ok for them to wait until it's already too late to do something about it, but not ok to take preventative action.
I disagree strongly. This is a HUGE fucking public safety issue. You should not be able to take your child out in public if you declined vaccination because "I don't feel like it."
So this would be the government mandating that you purchase a product from another private seller.
No, it's not. Especially when you consider that many states require you to have car insurance if you drive a car.
We're talking about the piles of shit who simply chose NOT to vaccinate their children, because they're idiots.
You're using a law not currently on the books
You talking about Conscription? Because that is still very much on the books. Why the fuck do you think all males have to register with Selective Service on their 18th birthday?