LOL. No, you wouldn't. You forgot 3) Not in any way prove its efficacy in treating everyone, or even its efficacy of treating *anyone*.
Stage 4 cancer is in itself a confounding factor that can't be easily accounted for in the statistics.
You're completely off the rails, chief. You're also politically aligned in this argument, I expect, given the pejorative commentary regarding "UBI proponents"
Please- stay out of the field of scientific study.
It's a language. Are you really going to argue that a language affects its validity as a client or server platform? I think you might just be a shitty programmer. That actually would explain most of this conversation.
But it's also not a very good trial or data point for UBI.
If you're developing a new wonder drug that makes everyone healthier, you don't select nothing but stage 4 cancer patients for your trial.
I can tell you I would be MORE interested in working harder if not for graduated tax brackets and taxes in general.
Really, though?
I've ascended 4 tax brackets in the last decade. Never once did I think, "You know, I don't really want more money... because I'll end up giving more money to the man than I did before. Better less money than paying the man.
No, Javascript will not stop being used on the back-end in a few years because of the advent of WebAssembly. It didn't disappear with asm.js, either.
It doesn't even make sense for it to, frankly. Node.js is very well suited for the model in which it is used. It isn't just the language that is the same. You're ignorant of the topics at play, as I originally asserted, and that's ok. It's not like I don't do this professionally, or anything. But you're entitled to your rather stupid opinion. Carry on, Internet Smart Guy.;)
A blown out window at 30,000 feet... Ya, it depressurized enough for people to need oxygen. Takes 5-8 minutes to reasonably descend down to 10,000 feet (without killing more people)
Now, there's a good chance you'd survive the oxygen deprivation at that altitude for that duration of time, but you could still definitely lose consciousness.
The opposite of brave is "cowardly". Could she have "cowardly" refused to land the plane? Nope.
Yes. In fact she could have. People in life-or-death situations cave to the pressure and cowardly retreat into a ball every day. Happens to soldiers, can happen to airline pilots.
Hell, I have seen it happen to an RC helicopter pilot.
No.. No, I definitely have not. They are also brave. Lots of people are brave.
brave
adjective, braver, bravest.
1. possessing or exhibiting courage or courageous endurance.
2. making a fine appearance.
3. Archaic. excellent; fine; admirable.
Unlikely. You know what they say- confidence is quiet. You seem to overestimate your knowledge in just about everything you post in... so again, how do people like you survive? Bouncing between short-term mid-income programming gigs? Honest question.
Please say something to at least acknowledge you have read my most recent exposition of my point
I did read it... Are you that badly in need of affirmation? There were multiple topics in play, I chose to ignore the ones that were redundant reiterations of your flawed initial idea.
you unfallowed mouth breather.
Ah yes, more ad hominem. Also the sign of a "smart" person.
You remind me of Trump talking about how his IQ is higher than Rex Tillerson's. It's like, the highest.
You aren't a Trump voter, perchance?
You have again failed basic comprehension of the English language.
I initiated conversation to let you know that you were wrong about something, and now you're discounting my retort to your ad hominem as a topic change.
How do people like you survive?
I'm confused. Are you stupid? Do you not know what bravery means??
If the woman kept it together at all after a the front half of an engine exploding, firing hypersonic projectiles into the cabin causing its very rapid depressurization (enough to pull a woman through a window) then she exhibited bravery. Since she continued flying the plane, she bravely flew the plane. If she landed with shit in her pants like I likely would have, then perhaps she didn't bravely fly the plane.
It also doesn't have access to the DOM..NET is so far superior to Javascript for writing web apps (as are many other options) that when it becomes an option, node will be gone with PERL.
I think it has less to do with me being a moron and more to do with your poor grasp of the language we're conversing in.
Read that sentence until you understand.
False. There isn't an easy-to-use set of built-in bridges, but emscripten can help you with that. Or you can roll your own. I did, it's not hard once you understand what WebAssembly is.
.NET is so far superior to Javascript for writing web apps (as are many other options) that when it becomes an option, node will be gone with PERL.
This.. indicates a fundamental lack of understanding of the topic at hand.
You're mixing up your front-end and back-ends.
https://gigaom.com/2010/07/17/...
Keep on spinning, amigo.
Why am I not whining about Apple's walled garden? because I don't care about it. In the case of the iPhone 4, it had a design flaw. A flaw easily fixed by a bumper (which I had, and eventually preferred)
You're the fuckstick here trying to pretend like it was a non-issue or an issue that existed in other phones, conflating it simple hand-covering of the antenna.
There's a reason they gave those bumpers out for free.
What's pathetic is the whole "you're holding it wrong" or "we changed how we calculate the signal bars" as a fix. Pure hubris. Hand in your geek card for swallowing that load without blinking.
https://www.anandtech.com/show...
The outside ridge of the iPhone4 is an external antenna. If you hold it in any way that bridges the 2 antennas (see: any way at all, *almost*) the attenuation is measurably terrible. Again, this is why the fix was just a rubber coating around the antenna.
Stop making yourself look like a fucking idiot. It's starting to become embarrassing.
Yes, but none of those phones consider "touching it anywhere on the metal ring around it" holding it wrong. You're a fucking toolshed. I've owned every iPhone made up to the 6s (still using it)
The attenuation on the metal ring was a whoops. Trying to defend it... is fucking stupid. Here's your sign.
Head * engineer at an ISP/Colocation/Hosting/Virtualization/you-name-it provider.
I manage/design our network connecting 8 datacenters together, operating as a multi-homed AS,serving a little north of 10,000 residential customers, with a few thousand being fiber-to-the-home.
~3500 of those customers pass around 7gbit/s of traffic during peak over a single Linux router running NAT code written by me on an e3-1250.
I write the lion's share of our software (mostly perl) to wrap it all together, and write custom solutions where necessary (again, mostly perl, but C where necessary).
Our services are distributed across ~150 or so linux servers across our datacenters, with a few Windows servers for billing and business financials.
Before this, I flipped burgers and hacked phones.
I wrote the first exploit against an RSA-signed phone bootloader that I'm aware of (Motorola Razr V3), published an Android privilege escalation (psneuter), and defeated the eMMC write-protection on a generation of HTC phones (wpthis).
What do I do? I guess i'm a technical jack-of-all-trades.
Also, I wasn't talking about ADS. ADS are children of the $DATA file attribute.
All information about an NTFS file is stored in a set of extensible attributes. It would have been trivial to add a new $FILETYPE attribute.
This is how symbolic links are implemented in NTFS.
You're kinda correct.
While there is no POSIX defined way to have extended file attributes, *BSD, Solaris, and Linux all provide mechanisms to store metadata along with an inode, typically in k:v pairs, which would have been sufficient to provide the file type resource fork that they had with UFS.
Also, ADS is used by Microsoft itself mostly. You're right it doesn't have much use in user code.
Slashdot Mirror
Or does it mean that 24 orders out of 1600+ is nothing bug fucking line noise?
LOL. No, you wouldn't. You forgot 3) Not in any way prove its efficacy in treating everyone, or even its efficacy of treating *anyone*.
Stage 4 cancer is in itself a confounding factor that can't be easily accounted for in the statistics.
You're completely off the rails, chief. You're also politically aligned in this argument, I expect, given the pejorative commentary regarding "UBI proponents"
Please- stay out of the field of scientific study.
It's a language. Are you really going to argue that a language affects its validity as a client or server platform? I think you might just be a shitty programmer. That actually would explain most of this conversation.
But it's also not a very good trial or data point for UBI.
If you're developing a new wonder drug that makes everyone healthier, you don't select nothing but stage 4 cancer patients for your trial.
I can tell you I would be MORE interested in working harder if not for graduated tax brackets and taxes in general.
Really, though?
I've ascended 4 tax brackets in the last decade. Never once did I think, "You know, I don't really want more money... because I'll end up giving more money to the man than I did before. Better less money than paying the man.
You're a strange one, Mr. Grinch.
No, Javascript will not stop being used on the back-end in a few years because of the advent of WebAssembly. It didn't disappear with asm.js, either. ;)
It doesn't even make sense for it to, frankly. Node.js is very well suited for the model in which it is used. It isn't just the language that is the same. You're ignorant of the topics at play, as I originally asserted, and that's ok. It's not like I don't do this professionally, or anything. But you're entitled to your rather stupid opinion. Carry on, Internet Smart Guy.
The blowout happened as the plane was ascending past 32,000 feet.
I'm not making any assumption.
A blown out window at 30,000 feet... Ya, it depressurized enough for people to need oxygen. Takes 5-8 minutes to reasonably descend down to 10,000 feet (without killing more people)
Now, there's a good chance you'd survive the oxygen deprivation at that altitude for that duration of time, but you could still definitely lose consciousness.
And was a Navy F18 pilot, etc, etc, etc.
The opposite of brave is "cowardly". Could she have "cowardly" refused to land the plane? Nope.
Yes. In fact she could have. People in life-or-death situations cave to the pressure and cowardly retreat into a ball every day. Happens to soldiers, can happen to airline pilots.
Hell, I have seen it happen to an RC helicopter pilot.
No.. No, I definitely have not. They are also brave. Lots of people are brave.
brave
adjective, braver, bravest.
1. possessing or exhibiting courage or courageous endurance.
2. making a fine appearance.
3. Archaic. excellent; fine; admirable.
I fear I have fed a troll.
I survive by being smarter than you.
Unlikely. You know what they say- confidence is quiet. You seem to overestimate your knowledge in just about everything you post in... so again, how do people like you survive? Bouncing between short-term mid-income programming gigs? Honest question.
Please say something to at least acknowledge you have read my most recent exposition of my point
I did read it... Are you that badly in need of affirmation? There were multiple topics in play, I chose to ignore the ones that were redundant reiterations of your flawed initial idea.
you unfallowed mouth breather.
Ah yes, more ad hominem. Also the sign of a "smart" person.
You remind me of Trump talking about how his IQ is higher than Rex Tillerson's. It's like, the highest.
You aren't a Trump voter, perchance?
You have again failed basic comprehension of the English language.
I initiated conversation to let you know that you were wrong about something, and now you're discounting my retort to your ad hominem as a topic change.
How do people like you survive?
I'm confused. Are you stupid? Do you not know what bravery means??
If the woman kept it together at all after a the front half of an engine exploding, firing hypersonic projectiles into the cabin causing its very rapid depressurization (enough to pull a woman through a window) then she exhibited bravery. Since she continued flying the plane, she bravely flew the plane. If she landed with shit in her pants like I likely would have, then perhaps she didn't bravely fly the plane.
They could crap their pants, cry or laugh...didn't matter
The pilot dealt with the dangerous situation while exhibiting bravery (not crapping her pants, crying, or laughing)
It also doesn't have access to the DOM. .NET is so far superior to Javascript for writing web apps (as are many other options) that when it becomes an option, node will be gone with PERL.
I think it has less to do with me being a moron and more to do with your poor grasp of the language we're conversing in.
Read that sentence until you understand.
It also doesn't have access to the DOM.
False. There isn't an easy-to-use set of built-in bridges, but emscripten can help you with that. Or you can roll your own. I did, it's not hard once you understand what WebAssembly is.
This.. indicates a fundamental lack of understanding of the topic at hand.
You're mixing up your front-end and back-ends.
https://gigaom.com/2010/07/17/...
Keep on spinning, amigo.
Why am I not whining about Apple's walled garden? because I don't care about it. In the case of the iPhone 4, it had a design flaw. A flaw easily fixed by a bumper (which I had, and eventually preferred)
You're the fuckstick here trying to pretend like it was a non-issue or an issue that existed in other phones, conflating it simple hand-covering of the antenna.
There's a reason they gave those bumpers out for free.
What's pathetic is the whole "you're holding it wrong" or "we changed how we calculate the signal bars" as a fix. Pure hubris. Hand in your geek card for swallowing that load without blinking.
http://fscked.co.uk/post/75103...
Would you like me to keep going, or you wanna pull Jobs' cock out of your mouth long enough to breathe?
https://www.anandtech.com/show...
The outside ridge of the iPhone4 is an external antenna. If you hold it in any way that bridges the 2 antennas (see: any way at all, *almost*) the attenuation is measurably terrible. Again, this is why the fix was just a rubber coating around the antenna.
Stop making yourself look like a fucking idiot. It's starting to become embarrassing.
Yes, but none of those phones consider "touching it anywhere on the metal ring around it" holding it wrong. You're a fucking toolshed. I've owned every iPhone made up to the 6s (still using it)
The attenuation on the metal ring was a whoops. Trying to defend it... is fucking stupid. Here's your sign.
Head * engineer at an ISP/Colocation/Hosting/Virtualization/you-name-it provider.
I manage/design our network connecting 8 datacenters together, operating as a multi-homed AS,serving a little north of 10,000 residential customers, with a few thousand being fiber-to-the-home.
~3500 of those customers pass around 7gbit/s of traffic during peak over a single Linux router running NAT code written by me on an e3-1250.
I write the lion's share of our software (mostly perl) to wrap it all together, and write custom solutions where necessary (again, mostly perl, but C where necessary).
Our services are distributed across ~150 or so linux servers across our datacenters, with a few Windows servers for billing and business financials.
Before this, I flipped burgers and hacked phones.
I wrote the first exploit against an RSA-signed phone bootloader that I'm aware of (Motorola Razr V3), published an Android privilege escalation (psneuter), and defeated the eMMC write-protection on a generation of HTC phones (wpthis).
What do I do? I guess i'm a technical jack-of-all-trades.
Also, I wasn't talking about ADS. ADS are children of the $DATA file attribute.
All information about an NTFS file is stored in a set of extensible attributes. It would have been trivial to add a new $FILETYPE attribute.
This is how symbolic links are implemented in NTFS.
and did not provide an interface for enumerating them
Not from any user interface, it didn't. But it was there in the API all along.
You're kinda correct.
While there is no POSIX defined way to have extended file attributes, *BSD, Solaris, and Linux all provide mechanisms to store metadata along with an inode, typically in k:v pairs, which would have been sufficient to provide the file type resource fork that they had with UFS.
Also, ADS is used by Microsoft itself mostly. You're right it doesn't have much use in user code.