Anyone want to lay down bets on how long this will last?? I'm giving 3 to 1 odds here.... If you do, please visit my online gaming site located at http://secretuspolicelist.gov/
"The Iranian government in particular wants to distract its population from the failing economy. The radical president of Iran was elected to fix economic woes, but he has been sidetracked by international conflict."
There are some serious spelling errors here. You misspelled "American" as "Iranian" and "the USA" as "Iran".
Violent video games don't kill people... Guns + Violent video games is what really kills people. Just ask old Jack Thompson... (before the flames start, yes, I was being very sarcastic. Couldn't you tell by my tone?)
"The people were nice, the food was great, everywhere was clean and the women were attractive. Now I can also do all the filesharing I want to? I'm moving."
Yeah, I was thinking about the breating factor also. Have there been any FPS made that take breath control into account?? Especially when shooting a rifle at a target 50+ yards away..
Agreed. That's why I switched to Mac. Now I am sick and fucking tired of the spinning beach ball, lack of any software, and getting sued when I accidentally said "Peapod" out loud last week.
Hey, the military actually used a modified version of DOOM to train Marines at one point...
"The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) had plans for using video games since the early 1980s. However, it was not until 1996, shortly after computer-based wargames were permitted on government computers for U.S. Marines, that U.S. Marine simulation experts modified the commercial game Doom II to create Marine Doom as a tactical training tool."
"Dear Mr./Ms MISTER WHIRLY:"
Mr. Mister Whirly?? Looks like someone else is on report for bad grammar.
"You emails and other online activity will be closely monitored during this period to ensure compliance."
That's funny, I assumed that they already were being monitored.
Well, he is a moderate Democrat compared to say, Howard Dean or someone similar. Maybe "conservative Democrat" may have been a more accurate term. Seeing all Dems seem to be moving to the middle, the lines may have changed a bit... And if you listened to the Karl Rove Propaganda Machine(TM)for the 2004 election, Kerry was the most liberal voting senator of all time...
I never claimed to be the "decider" of who is worthy or not. I merely asked you a hypothetical question to see what your mindset was. I never said anything about wanting to "get rid of" Paris Hilton or anybody else you have decided that I have decided is "worthless". I was only asking who you would rather have around - non-productive legal or productive illegal.
If disagreeing with laws I don't support is ANTI-AMERICAN than label me that if you need to. Questioning laws and the government on issues you don't agree on is the MOST AMERICAN thing anyone can do. Blindly supporting every decision your government makes does not make you a patriot - it makes you a nationalist. There is a HUGE difference (but probably not to you). True patriots have the courage to try and change what is wrong, not just go on supporting it.
"You are either with us or you are our enemy." - is the most bullshit rhetoric ever. So you are saying that I either agree with EVERY decision the government makes or NONE of the decisions? Again, the world I live in isn't so black and white. I can pick and choose whichever decisions I want to agree or disagree with at will - that is what having freedom is truly about. Sometimes they make the right decision, sometimes wrong. The whole "with us or against us" thing sounds like something a 5 year old would say on the playground after their pride gets hurt, and demonstrates inability to clearly see how the world around you works...
"Your illegal is not "honest." He committed a crime by illegaly entering the US and has not promptly reported himself to the INS."
I never claimed he was. I asked you if you "honestly" would rather have one than the other. If you would rather uphold a law than use your brain, I can't help you. If you would rather defend Paris Hilton than Jose the busboy, I pity you.
"If you are defending illegals being in the US, then you are "harboring and abetting criminals" and are a criminal yourself."
Absolutely 100% wrong. I can have any opinion I want about illegals being here, and it is NOT a crime (yet anyways). Now if I actually have knowledge of, or give aid/shelter to someone I KNOW is illegal, that may be a crime.
"We have laws for lawful entry into the US. Those who do not follow them are criminals. Why is that such as difficult concept?"
Wow, I wish the world I lived in was as black and white as the one you live in. So you would honestly rather have a non-working, scumbag, non-productive member of society who is LEGAL living here than a working, productive member of society who was here ILLEGALLY? If that is the case maybe you should value common sense and thinking above following every letter of the law.
Ok, so let's arrest them all and fill up our jails (and cost our taxpayers tons of money to house/cloth/feed them). We can just let out all the violent offenders to make room, just like they did in the 80s to make room for all the non-violent drug offenders (thakns Reagan!). Thank God they did that because you know what? Drugs are not available anywhere now thanks to the War on Drugs (Mission Accomplished!), and crime is practically non-existent (except for all those damn illegals)... I know what your response will be "No, just deport them" - and they will be back in 2 days, a little wiser on how NOT to get caught most likely...
"The "problem" with having judicial oversight is that, sometimes, the judges do not agree that your "evidence" is sufficient."
And this is EXACTLY the reason we have this system. Would you rather a politician with an agenda make the decision, or a judge who actually KNOWS and understands the law?? If there isn't sufficient evidence, than no warrant should be issued, period.
"I would say the majority of gang members are illegals or children of illegals."
Maybe the Sureno 13 gang, but what about the American gangs, like the Crips, Bloods, Disciples, etc.. They are predominantly African-American, and not illegals... You can't blame ALL crime on illegal minorities...
"What happens when Hillary Clinton gets into power"
Given the Democrats reaction to Joe Liberman's moderate thinking, I hope that Hillary's chances are akin to a snowball's chances in hell. I only pray that Hillary isn't the Dems answer, or it's 4 more years of Republican rule. I'm not really a Democrat (although I usually end up voting that way) but more of a "personal freedom" liberal, but if she runs, and the Republicans run someone who isn't a nutjob (like McCain), it may be the first time I vote Republican for a presidential election.
Slashdot Mirror
Anyone want to lay down bets on how long this will last?? I'm giving 3 to 1 odds here.... If you do, please visit my online gaming site located at http://secretuspolicelist.gov/
"Every time you eat, the terrorists win!"
Now who is being naive? Everyone knows the "liberal media" is really controlled by a cabal of fundamentalist Muslims...
"The Iranian government in particular wants to distract its population from the failing economy. The radical president of Iran was elected to fix economic woes, but he has been sidetracked by international conflict."
There are some serious spelling errors here. You misspelled "American" as "Iranian" and "the USA" as "Iran".
"Attacking on uniformed soldiers of nation A is war WHEN YOU ARE A UNIFORMED SOLDER OF NATION B,C,D,E or so on."
Nope, in the USA, it is only war if Congress declares it so. No one else has the power to declare "war" but them.
This just in - rounded corners now being used by terrorists to train. We have now switched to living in a octagonal world...
Violent video games don't kill people... Guns + Violent video games is what really kills people. Just ask old Jack Thompson... (before the flames start, yes, I was being very sarcastic. Couldn't you tell by my tone?)
"The people were nice, the food was great, everywhere was clean and the women were attractive. Now I can also do all the filesharing I want to? I'm moving."
Apparently you have never heard of ABBA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABBA
or Ace of Base http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ace_of_Base
I see you got the joke then...
http://www.thesuperficial.com/videos/kanye_katrina .wmv
A video is worth several thousand words...
Yeah, I was thinking about the breating factor also. Have there been any FPS made that take breath control into account?? Especially when shooting a rifle at a target 50+ yards away..
Agreed. That's why I switched to Mac. Now I am sick and fucking tired of the spinning beach ball, lack of any software, and getting sued when I accidentally said "Peapod" out loud last week.
Hey, the military actually used a modified version of DOOM to train Marines at one point...
"The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) had plans for using video games since the early 1980s. However, it was not until 1996, shortly after computer-based wargames were permitted on government computers for U.S. Marines, that U.S. Marine simulation experts modified the commercial game Doom II to create Marine Doom as a tactical training tool."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America's_Army
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Doom
(In my best Kayne West voice) "The BBC doesn't care about Linux people"
go away trolling AC. It takes a lot of guts to be wrong anonymously!
Wow, you are truly clueless and I am done playing. Have a nice illegal free life...
I don't get no respect
"Dear Mr./Ms MISTER WHIRLY:"
Mr. Mister Whirly?? Looks like someone else is on report for bad grammar.
"You emails and other online activity will be closely monitored during this period to ensure compliance."
That's funny, I assumed that they already were being monitored.
Well, he is a moderate Democrat compared to say, Howard Dean or someone similar. Maybe "conservative Democrat" may have been a more accurate term. Seeing all Dems seem to be moving to the middle, the lines may have changed a bit... And if you listened to the Karl Rove Propaganda Machine(TM)for the 2004 election, Kerry was the most liberal voting senator of all time...
I never claimed to be the "decider" of who is worthy or not. I merely asked you a hypothetical question to see what your mindset was. I never said anything about wanting to "get rid of" Paris Hilton or anybody else you have decided that I have decided is "worthless". I was only asking who you would rather have around - non-productive legal or productive illegal.
...
If disagreeing with laws I don't support is ANTI-AMERICAN than label me that if you need to. Questioning laws and the government on issues you don't agree on is the MOST AMERICAN thing anyone can do. Blindly supporting every decision your government makes does not make you a patriot - it makes you a nationalist. There is a HUGE difference (but probably not to you). True patriots have the courage to try and change what is wrong, not just go on supporting it.
"You are either with us or you are our enemy." - is the most bullshit rhetoric ever. So you are saying that I either agree with EVERY decision the government makes or NONE of the decisions? Again, the world I live in isn't so black and white. I can pick and choose whichever decisions I want to agree or disagree with at will - that is what having freedom is truly about. Sometimes they make the right decision, sometimes wrong. The whole "with us or against us" thing sounds like something a 5 year old would say on the playground after their pride gets hurt, and demonstrates inability to clearly see how the world around you works
"Your illegal is not "honest." He committed a crime by illegaly entering the US and has not promptly reported himself to the INS."
I never claimed he was. I asked you if you "honestly" would rather have one than the other. If you would rather uphold a law than use your brain, I can't help you. If you would rather defend Paris Hilton than Jose the busboy, I pity you.
"If you are defending illegals being in the US, then you are "harboring and abetting criminals" and are a criminal yourself."
Absolutely 100% wrong. I can have any opinion I want about illegals being here, and it is NOT a crime (yet anyways). Now if I actually have knowledge of, or give aid/shelter to someone I KNOW is illegal, that may be a crime.
"We have laws for lawful entry into the US. Those who do not follow them are criminals. Why is that such as difficult concept?"
Wow, I wish the world I lived in was as black and white as the one you live in. So you would honestly rather have a non-working, scumbag, non-productive member of society who is LEGAL living here than a working, productive member of society who was here ILLEGALLY? If that is the case maybe you should value common sense and thinking above following every letter of the law.
I think you are late for you Minuteman Patrol...
Ok, so let's arrest them all and fill up our jails (and cost our taxpayers tons of money to house/cloth/feed them). We can just let out all the violent offenders to make room, just like they did in the 80s to make room for all the non-violent drug offenders (thakns Reagan!). Thank God they did that because you know what? Drugs are not available anywhere now thanks to the War on Drugs (Mission Accomplished!), and crime is practically non-existent (except for all those damn illegals)... I know what your response will be "No, just deport them" - and they will be back in 2 days, a little wiser on how NOT to get caught most likely...
"The "problem" with having judicial oversight is that, sometimes, the judges do not agree that your "evidence" is sufficient."
And this is EXACTLY the reason we have this system. Would you rather a politician with an agenda make the decision, or a judge who actually KNOWS and understands the law?? If there isn't sufficient evidence, than no warrant should be issued, period.
"I would say the majority of gang members are illegals or children of illegals."
Maybe the Sureno 13 gang, but what about the American gangs, like the Crips, Bloods, Disciples, etc.. They are predominantly African-American, and not illegals... You can't blame ALL crime on illegal minorities...
"What happens when Hillary Clinton gets into power"
Given the Democrats reaction to Joe Liberman's moderate thinking, I hope that Hillary's chances are akin to a snowball's chances in hell. I only pray that Hillary isn't the Dems answer, or it's 4 more years of Republican rule. I'm not really a Democrat (although I usually end up voting that way) but more of a "personal freedom" liberal, but if she runs, and the Republicans run someone who isn't a nutjob (like McCain), it may be the first time I vote Republican for a presidential election.