Slashdot Mirror


Videogames Used to Train Terrorists?

kalpatin writes "Reuters reports that videogames are being used to train terrorists. The title Counter-Strike is apparently being used as a tool to prepare individuals for a mission: blowing up an oil tanker. The ultimate goal is to 'make the strait of Hormuz impassable, the Jomhouri-ye Eslami daily reported. About two-fifths of globally traded oil passes through the channel. The game illustrates a warning by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who said in June that oil exports in the Gulf region could be seriously endangered if the United States made a wrong move on Iran.'"

265 comments

  1. Guns used to train terrorist too.... by RingDev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And yet we focus on video games?

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Skevin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, video games have been used to train terrorists for years. Case in point:

      Pacman trains potential terrorists to avoid TSA guards in twisty airports, surviving indefinitely by eating crumbs off the floor if you have to (my first time on O'Hare, it may as well have been a maze).

      Frogger teaches potential terrorists to hide amongst crowded streets until they are ready to deliver a lethal payload to a densely populated area.

      I won't even get started about Elevator Action.

      Time Pilot trains potential terrorists to crash your plane into larger aircraft when they're too drunk to shoot straight.

      Terrorists use Tetris to learn to lay down acoutic floor tile over hidden trap doors to hide even more games^W training software from authorities.

      Centipede trains terrorists to destroy entire trains, one car at a time. The bombing in Spain was performed by a terrorist who had a console cabinet of Centipede in his garage.

      Dig Dug provides a methodic exercise for Terrorists to develop complex subterranean networks by which to pump deadly nerve agents into unsuspecting groups. This video game was implicated in the Sarin gas attack in the Japanese subway several years ago.

      There are several other known, but classified, examples perpetrated by the terrorist group Ar'Qaida, who have set up several cells masquerading with fronts such as "Chuck E. Cheese" and "Dave and Buster's". Be alert. Be vigilant. The Computer is not your friend.

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    2. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Your comparision is not good, as there are plenty of people who want to ban guns AND videogames. For many people, your gun analogy means "video games are like guns... guns should be banned... therefore video games should be banned".

      If you want to make a funny comparison, for some easy slashdot karma, you should have compared video games to toilet paper or food and water - items also used by terrorists during training yet are for the most part harmless. Gun evoke hysteria with many in the slashdot crowd.

    3. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by roseblood · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed the big one.

      MS Flight sim to train kamakazie jihadist. We all know how well that worked. "WTF DOOD, THERES NO MOUSE! WHERE IS F6, I NEED THE CHASE PLANE VIEW TO FLY THIS TUB"

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      For the love of god, where are my mod points?

    5. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by roseblood · · Score: 1

      I forgot another important one.

      War/Star-craft teaches these terrorists the value of clear cutting forests/crystal formations and strip-mining of ore/vespine gas. When their supplies run out do they come up with "alternative energy" like solar or geothermal? Hell no, they attack their neighbors in order to have a go at clear-cutting and strip-mining their homelands.

      Time to ban RTS games!

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by RingDev · · Score: 1

      1) +Funny gains no karma
      2) Gun control is a legitimate concern.

      My point was not to be funny, so much as point out the apparent irony. We blame games for violence yet we allow children and unstable people have access to fire arms. Not necessarily tied to Terrorism, but I got kinda tweaked this morning when I heard about yet another school shooting where a high school kid with a troubled past took his father's gun and shot the principal. I can't say for sure, but I would be willing to guess that as a non-military American, you are significantly more likely to get shot by a disgruntled teenager with their parent's gun, than a terrorist who played CS.

      But at the same time, the second amendment is there for a reason. That reason may not be Bush, but it will likely be some future dictator who uses Bush's laws to remove even more of our liberties.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    7. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by demondawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the actual mod in that situation would be -1, "The joke went over your head".

    8. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Violent video games don't kill people... Guns + Violent video games is what really kills people. Just ask old Jack Thompson... (before the flames start, yes, I was being very sarcastic. Couldn't you tell by my tone?)

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    9. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by metroplex · · Score: 1

      Well, and don't mention zergling rushes! Just imagine terrorists producing as many children as possible as fast as possible and flooding your home with them! *THAT* would be terrorism! Kekeke! P.S. it's "vespene* :D

      --
      "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
    10. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by operagost · · Score: 1

      If you can figure out how to confiscate the hundreds of thousands of AK-47s from those terrorists, be my guest. While you're at it, make sure you confiscate all the powder, nails, and metal casings they're using to make their IEDs.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by clydemaxwell · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If I see one more 'videogames violent?' 'videogames are TERRAR TOOLS??' post, I am going to seriously Headshot someone. I mean, kill someone.
       
      ...Yeah.

      --
      Browsing with classic discussion, noscript, at -1 and nested
      no hidden comments and I only mod UP
    12. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by lucerin · · Score: 1

      to quote an old saying, "Gun control is using both hands" the "unstable" people are going to get guns anyway. since that's the case, does it really make sense to ban people from procuring guns to defend themselves? IMO not enough people carry guns or other weapons. if everyone knew how to use a gun, and owned one, i'd wager that violent crime would decrease dramatically

    13. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by egamma · · Score: 1

      I sure would sleep better at night if I knew that the Police trained by playing the CT side in Counter-Strike...they could train against these guys! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6799188256 74943648&q=counterstrike http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5925864301 745122350&q=counterstrike

    14. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by ectal · · Score: 1


      Does Yoshi's Cookie come into the Ar'Qaida training program at all? I always felt there was something sinister below the surface with that one.

      --
      http://nerdcartoons.com/
    15. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      and TFA's title is "Iranian video game offers chance to blow up U.S. tanker"

      Wow, they forgot to mention that playing BF2 gives you the chance to:

      - Shoot a US soldier directly in the face
      - Blow up all manner of US vehicles, tanks and helicopters
      - Sneak onto a US battleship
      - Destroy Ground Based Radar
      - Hang out and snipe US soldiers as they spawn
      - Save your crew with the kit you stole of a US medic
      - The US commander is the one on the outside of the ship laying down.

      BF2 is far more dangerous for teaching terrorists how to hurt US forces... it should be banned too.

    16. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah actually if anything MSFS is a lot more realistic and prepares you a lot better to fly a real aircraft than CS preapres you for street gun combat.

    17. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Ryan+Mallon · · Score: 1

      Why do we focus only on this "Video games train violence" aspect? If violent games train people to be killers then surely race car games can train people to be world class race drivers, golf simulators can make us as good as Tiger Woods, Simcity will make me an architect and playing life and death will train me up to perform an appendictomy on someone. Or maybe they are just games.

    18. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is a fundamental ideological reason for gun control... if the people are armed, people have power to defy the state. If you are a facist, socialist, or other ideology based on state control, the idea that people may defy the government is disturbing. It may make sense to have people armed in terms of preventing common crime, but common crime is a price some people are willing to accept in exchange for a government with limitless power.

      Since, in statist ideology such as facism or socialism, the state is the only institution capable of "doing great things", or "promoting social justice", or "liberating the people", an armed population capable of overthrowing the state is terrifying. Guns in private hands are a symbol of pure evil.

    19. Re:Guns used to train terrorist too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, like in Palestine ?

  2. We should ban games, guns, TV... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    They are all fantasy, right? And, in theory, could train people to do anything they show. Why the hell are games so put upon? Are we supposed to live in a rounded-corners world?

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:We should ban games, guns, TV... by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

      Well, if our pretzel-choking, draft-dodging coke-head resident of the white house has to live in a rounded-corners world, apparently the rest of us should, too.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    2. Re:We should ban games, guns, TV... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      This just in - rounded corners now being used by terrorists to train. We have now switched to living in a octagonal world...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  3. Is this just a counterstrike map? by nweaver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ITs unclear, but it sounds like its just a cool CounterStrike map.

    If so, where can we get it, it sounds like fun!

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Is this just a counterstrike map? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congratulations, you've just been added to the terrorist suspect list ;-)

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Is this just a counterstrike map? by usrusr · · Score: 1

      yeah, the description of that tanker having exactly two "bomb-spots" did ring a bell.

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    3. Re:Is this just a counterstrike map? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's no CS map in which you can plant two bombs - the terrorists only ever get one bomb. That suggests this is a different game. Also, it apparently took 8 people 3 months to make it - that's a bit much for one map. Perhaps the game has an Arabic name which loosely translates as "Counter Strike", and the Reuters journalist was not aware of an existing game of that name.

    4. Re:Is this just a counterstrike map? by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 2

      Congratulations, you've just been added to the terrorist suspect list ;-)

      Awww, it's not that hard to get on. All you have to do it write "Kip Hawley is an Idiot" on a plastic bag and bam. You're on the list :-)

      Welcome to the club ;-)

      (note to self... must start selling "Kip Hawley is an Idiot" T-Shirts and profit!)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    5. Re:Is this just a counterstrike map? by XenoRyet · · Score: 1
      8 people taking 3 months is only slightly long for development of a really good map, but is incredibly short for development of even the most rudementary independant game of an FPS nature.

      I wish the article would have included more information about the game itself, because it really isn't clear exactly what they're talking about. It could be a standard CS map, some sort of mod for CS or another engine, or a compleatly independant game. The rest of the article is of limited value when it's not clear what the subject is.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    6. Re:Is this just a counterstrike map? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called AS_Oilrig, and the goal is for the counter-terrorists to protect a VIP to the helicopter on the roof during a terrorist assault targetting the VIP assassination - there is no bombing the oilrig and that is a gross and slanderous lie. It's available for Counter-Strike one, it hasn't yet been released for Counter-Strike: Source.

      The real threat politicians should be worried about is Dihydrogen Monoxide, terrorists are 70% Dihydrogen Monoxide - coincidence? I think not! Dihydrogen Monoxide caused the deaths of thousands of people after it sank the Titanic, a Dihydrogen Monoxide attack in Indonesia killed tens of thousands of people a few years ago, and the entire city of New Orleans was wiped off the face of the earth once already by this terrible compound! Politicians need to focus their efforts on catagorically banning dihydrogen monoxide - and all politicians would do well to set an example by ceasing to consume said odius compound.

  4. AA by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've heard that America's Army is useful for understanding the American military mindset. Maybe it should be reclassified as a state secret...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:AA by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      Quick solution to all those violent game "problems". Reclassify them all as state secrets!

    2. Re:AA by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      I believe when you log in you see the opposing team as the terrorists and yourself as an American solider. So clearly there are no terrorists playing this game? Or maybe everyone is?!

    3. Re:AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that America's Army is useful for understanding the American military mindset. Maybe it should be reclassified as a state secret...

      Not really. I mean, have you tried torturing prisoners in America's Army? Sexually assaulting children, then murdering the entire family and torching the place to cover it up? No. It's not like the real thing at all...

  5. WTF? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So now I'm a terrorist because I can use a mouse and a keyboard?

    Insane bastard writers article
    Posts article
    Slashdot picks it up
    ???
    Profit?

    I swear if someone is training this way they are about as dangerous as your average DnD player with a sharp pencil.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:WTF? by joe+155 · · Score: 3, Funny

      very true, although I could use something like this to plan a mission I would die immidiately if my gun didn't act exactly like it does in the game, people have better than average AI, I actually die when I get shot once (and a medi-pack couldn't stop the blood and make me ready for action again).
      I would also need to be able to find guns lying around...

      Other than that it would be exactly like the game and I'd be an ace terrorist.

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      So now I'm a terrorist because I can use a mouse and a keyboard?

      Considering that this criteria instantly excludes the executive boards at most corporations, maybe it's exactly what they're trying to do.

    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I swear if someone is training this way they are about as dangerous as your average DnD player with a sharp pencil.


      DnD players with pencils can indeed be quite dangerous. Perhaps that innocuous looking pencil is, infact, a +5 Vorpal Sharp Pencil Avenger.
    4. Re:WTF? by Cinual · · Score: 1

      4chan party van

  6. Why, YES! by ludomancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They are. It goes both ways I think: http://www.americasarmy.com/

    1. Re:Why, YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The military uses a VR environment with a real rifle with "real" blanks so you actually feel the pull of the trigger, the weight of the gun, and the kick of each shot as you fire.

      Claiming that America's Army trains you to be a soldier by pushing a mouse around is like claiming Counterstrike teaches you to be a terrorist by cussing at spawn campers, spraying pornographic tags, leaping around like a bunny on crack, and being teabagged by a 13 year old after he kills you.

    2. Re:Why, YES! by bunions · · Score: 1

      There's also a goodly number of videogames that have been adapted (or 'modded' to use the vulgar street argot) for use by the military. I've seen Doom, Quake2 and (I think) the Americas Army game used in this way. The funniest one was a bureaucracy training unit where your gun was replaced by a wad of papers, and you would go around 'shooting' these papers onto the proper desk and into the correct filing cabinet.

      The games do not pretend to teach marksmanship. They generally are used to re-enforce squad tactics, and are apparently quite successful. There's another that is used as training for Iraqi liasons that teaches basic Arabic of some variant, as well as cultural cues and whatnot. So for instance, if you don't remove your hat when you enter a restaurant, your contact is less likely to give you the information or cooperation you want.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    3. Re:Why, YES! by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      I think FPS games can also be used to practise correct movement in a combat situation: moving from cover to cover, peeking around corners, positioning yourself so that you have minimum exposure to enemy fire etc. When you play Counter-Strike (or something similiar) long enough, these things become completely instinctive. Another thing that occured to me is that you have to be careful when you're playing with friendly fire enabled, and eventually you'll learn to identify your target before shooting it to pieces, and resisting the urge to start spraying around when a teammate or hostage is between you and the enemy. Not everyone learns these valuable skills, unfortunately.

      Of course, none of this is a substitute for real training.

    4. Re:Why, YES! by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

      They are. It goes both ways I think: http://www.americasarmy.com/

      Yes, but in AA, you can never be the terrorists. Your team always appears in US issue clothing, and the enemies in hoods and masks. Obviously, it can't be used for training terrorists then.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    5. Re:Why, YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in AA, you can never be the terrorists.

      One man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. I imagine that young girl in Iraq who was raped and killed by American soldiers was pretty terrorised.

  7. Guns don't kill people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    dangerous minorities^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hgames do

    1. Re:Guns don't kill people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever modded this troll obviously doesn't watch the Family Guy enough...

  8. Hope so by Unc-70 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The thought of highly trained terrorists running around shouting 'BOOOOM Headshot' whilst shooting or stabbing randomly at the scenery or team mates, does not fill me with fear.

    --
    Ye have made your way from the worm to man, and much within you is still worm.
    1. Re:Hope so by wired_LAIN · · Score: 5, Funny

      CIA agent: Sir, the terrorists seem to be using some sort of code...
      Terrorist 1: d00d these guys are camping.
      Terrorist 2: fuxing n00bs. use noob stick gogo pwn them.
      Terrorist 1: OMG lag!!! they r using som hax. cia clan sux i'm out.
      Terrorist 2: *shoots terrorist 1*
      Terrorist 1: why u TKing??? fag
      Terrorist 2: gg no re

      --
      It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.
    2. Re:Hope so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorists are using viedo games to learn to:

      hop like a bunny 35 feet in the air
      run while firing sniper rifles
      switch between a sniper rifle and desert eagle at an insanely unrealistic rate
      magically walk in the sky
      shout "HUUUUUUUUMILIATION"

    3. Re:Hope so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, I love this map Dust. I can pwn so many n00bs at it.

    4. Re:Hope so by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      Just spraypaint pron on the walls. That seems to work in the normal game too.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    5. Re:Hope so by tehsecksee · · Score: 1

      hHAHahhaha oh man, thats the best thing i've heard all day

  9. Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Summary: Jack Thompson once again pouring hot grits down your pants.

  10. Available here for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know about Counter-Strike, but check out this free one. :-)

    http://www.americasarmy.com/

    Doh!

    1. Re:Available here for free by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Ever since that game was released years ago, the very mention of it *still* produces the same thought in my head.

      "Greetings, starfighter. You have been recruited by the starleague to defend the frontier against Zuur and the Kodan Armada."

  11. Not Surprising, and it's already being done by RxScram · · Score: 1

    This is just one video game out of many that has been created to train / recruit / fulfill fantasies of would-be terrorists.

    For example, http://jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/003651. php/ details a game in which you perform terrorist activities against Israel.

    Another example is a game called "Night of Bush Capturing". As its name implies, the goal of the game is to hunt down "a character representing" President George W. Bush. There are six levels with names such as "Jihad Beginning," American's Hell," and "Bush Hunter Like a Rat," and traditional jihadist songs play in the background.

    That the Iranians are now doing developing a game to do the same is neither surprising nor should it be alarming. It could very well be an entertainment video game that is targetted to a very specific and narrow genre.

    1. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by Aim+Here · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For the record, Under Siege (and Under Ash, the other game by the same people) don't condone terrorist actions, focusing instead on attacks on the Israeli IDF, which is illegally occupying several other countries. (Attacking on-duty soldiers is warfare, not terrorism, by most definitions of the word).

      In fact, killing civilians ends the game instantly; the game is far MORE sensitive to charges of terrorism than many pro-American so-called anti-terrorist tactical FPSes.

    2. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Attacking on uniformed soldiers of nation A is war WHEN YOU ARE A UNIFORMED SOLDER OF NATION B,C,D,E or so on.

      Attacking ANYONE when you are not a uniformed member of an armed force of a sovreign nation makes you a criminal (assuming murder/attempted murder is a crime in the place where you do this attacking.)

      Attacking any civilian regardless of your status as civilian vs soldier is a crime (again, asumptions about local laws.

      So, civilians attack = crime (The Brits thought those colonists were criminals for example, and they were, but they won, so they write the history to look like the good guys..which they may or may not be...that's for a diffrent debate.)

      Attack civilians = crime (duh)

      Soldiers attack solders = war.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    3. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by Aim+Here · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well that's one way of looking at it. At the risk of godwinning myself, that condemns the US colonists, the French, Yugoslav and Soviet resistance to Nazi occupation and various other good guys to the criminal bin. In any case, resistance of this sort is NOT terrorism - terrorism is force against civilians for political purposes. In fact,the UN, in a general assembly resolution on terrorism, still affirmed the right of peoples to use force to resist racist, colonial and imperialist regimes.

      Personally I'm of the opinion that if you are in someone else's country illegally as a member of an occupying army, then it's right, proper and decent of the local population to take potshots at you for any reason they so desire, but this is heading down the road of offtopic flamebait so I'll stop here.

    4. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Well that's one way of looking at it. At the risk of godwinning myself, that condemns the US colonists, the French, Yugoslav and Soviet resistance to Nazi occupation and various other good guys to the criminal bin. In any case, resistance of this sort is NOT terrorism - terrorism is force against civilians for political purposes.

      I reply:
      Sometimes one must partake in a criminal action. When your moral compass points you one way and the enviroment(nation) you live in points another you can stand up for what you think is right (Rosa Parks, French partisans, American revolutionaries, etc.) or you can sit back and watch as people you think of as evil/misguided/wrong go unopposed (typical soldier in the army of WWII Germany, guards of internment camps in the USA for those of Asian descent.)

      Being CRIMINAL dosen't automaticly mean being wrong. I was being legalistic not moralistic in the 1st post. Now you see the moralistic side of this issue.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    5. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by nuzak · · Score: 1

      So it's putting on a uniform that makes all the difference?

      Should they be required to march ten abreast and lead with fife and drum?

      Seriously, there are civilian targets and there are military targets. Attacking a soldier on duty is pretty clear-cut which it is. The Other Side is always The Bad Guy anyway.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Attacking on uniformed soldiers of nation A is war WHEN YOU ARE A UNIFORMED SOLDER OF NATION B,C,D,E or so on."

      Nope, in the USA, it is only war if Congress declares it so. No one else has the power to declare "war" but them.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by LuisAnaya · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that the acts of the FALN and Macheteros against US servicemen in the 1970's in Puerto Rico are justified?

      --
      Vi havas e-poston.
    8. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Okay, in response to Mister Whirly:

      "Attacking on uniformed soldiers of nation A is AN ACT OF war WHEN YOU ARE A UNIFORMED SOLDER OF NATION B,C,D,E or so on."

      There. Clarified. Some nations other than the USA do not need congress to declare war BTW. As I recall there have been PLENTY of wars well before the US Congress got around to declaring one. One only needs to think of the most recent big one. It was a war for quite some time before the USA decided to become armed combatants (declare war.) There is a big world outside your borders and it moves without seeking the consent of your Congress.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    9. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      An act or war is much different than a declaration of war.
      "As I recall there have been PLENTY of wars well before the US Congress got around to declaring one"

      Nope, only "conflicts". Again, in the US only congress can officially declare "war". (This was designed to thwart chicken hawks like our current president with checks and balances. Remeber way back when when we still had those??) Our actions in other countries have no bearing on whether or not a legal "war" has been declared.

      "It was a war for quite some time before the USA decided to become armed combatants (declare war.)"

      Maybe in your eyes, but not legally in the US.

      Of course laws and regulations don't mean much to the current administration, who has Alberto Gonzales declare everything they do legal after the fact... Also, it would be hard to declare a legal war on "terror" - acts of war are only declared against other countries, not abstract ideas.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    10. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Attacking ANYONE when you are not a uniformed member of an armed force of a sovreign nation makes you a criminal (assuming murder/attempted murder is a crime in the place where you do this attacking).

      It's more complicated than that. Quoting wikipedia on the Third Geneva Convention:

      Article 4 defines prisoners of war to include:

      • 4.1.1 Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict and members of militias of such armed forces
      • 4.1.2 Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, provided that they fulfill all of the following conditions: that of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates; that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance (there are limited exceptions to this among countries who observe the 1977 Protocol I); that of carrying arms openly; that of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.
      • 4.1.3 Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power.
      • 4.1.4 Civilians who have non-combat support roles with the military and who carry a valid identity card issued by the military they support.
      • 4.1.5 Merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any other provisions of international law.
      • 4.1.6 Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.
    11. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by roseblood · · Score: 1

      "As I recall there have been PLENTY of wars well before the US Congress got around to declaring one"

      Nope, only "conflicts".


      Tell this to all the folks in Europe and the Asian portions of the Pacific. There most defenitely was a great war on well before December 8 1942(42?) It was no mere conflict.

      Granted the UNITED STATES (theoreticly) does not enter a state of war without the consent of its legeslative body. But even then ask any soldier or marine who did service in SE Asia in the mid to late 60's and ask them if they did or did not fight a war.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    12. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

      That's why it's very important to demonize the Iraqi resistance. Although 90% of the attacks (according to a recent DIA report) are directed at US Forces, most of the coverage is devoted to attacks on civilians. The resistance is largely ignored compared to the reporting on secterian violence.

      Most Iraqis want US forces to withdraw and 61% also approve of attacks on US forces. Interestingly Shia, Sunni and Kurdish groups all hate Osama bin laden.

      Full report here: http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/sep06/I raq_Sep06_quaire.pdf

    13. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by jafac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      terrorism is force against civilians for political purposes

      What is fearmongering using terrorists for political purposes?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is fearmongering using terrorists for political purposes?

      "Republican"

    15. Re:Not Surprising, and it's already being done by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      in any case, resistance of this sort is NOT terrorism - terrorism is force against civilians for political purposes.
      Nice try, but wrong. There was no difference between the P.I.R.A. bombing civilians or shooting British soldiers, it all amounted to terrorism.

      Terrorists get re-labelled as "freedom fighters" only if they win.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. Oh, for the love of...! by ExPacis · · Score: 1

    What now, we have to watch out for bunny-hopping arabs?

  13. Ok, ignoring the important aspect... by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where can we download a copy of their mission? I wanna try it!

    That said, of course, if the US had a copy of their mission, they'd know the plan and how to guard it pretty well.

    1. Re:Ok, ignoring the important aspect... by Ai+Olor-Wile · · Score: 1

      The article seems to think that said mission is an inherent part of CS. (The other game mentioned in TFA refers to a game in which the US attacks Iran's nuke supply.) It's phrased to make it look like people who play Counter-Strike are, or are being turned into, terrorists.

      Meanwhile, Ten Years Ago... See kids, America's Army didn't do this first.

    2. Re:Ok, ignoring the important aspect... by mmalove · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd daresay we could even "train" for it.

      Please.

      Videogames do not train you how to shoot a gun. They don't teach you how to handle yourself in a lifethreatening situation. They don't help make you run faster.

      They are a good teambuilding exercise, but certainly not a core piece of developing a person into a deadly machine.

      That said, that title/summary is very very misleading. The article should have been - 8 independant game developers create CS like game with more realistic terrorist target. No where in here do I see the Government sponsoring the game, or training terrorists with it.

      And I promise you - if it picks up widespread exposure perfectly patriotic, Republican Americans will pick up this game, and play on the terrorists side. Why? Because inevitably people that suck at shooters always play the good guys.

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  14. ??? = Advertising. n/t by RingDev · · Score: 1

    nothing to see here.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:??? = Advertising. n/t by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      Advertising? Is that anything like adblock? 'cos I've got that....

  15. CounterStrike? by Xaroth · · Score: 5, Funny

    And here I thought that CounterStrike would only train terrorists to lay on the ground, half-dead, shouting "OMG WTF AWP CAMPING FAG!1!1!!". Advanced CounterStrike classes involve running around vandalizing walls with pr0n.

    1. Re:CounterStrike? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      Advanced CounterStrike classes involve running around vandalizing walls with pr0n.

      I used to spray Mr. Goatse with the caption "I fucked you" whenever I'd get a particularly sweet kill.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:CounterStrike? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      No wonder you got "sweet kills"... 13 year olds were sitting in front of their PCs twitching in horror when they seen that.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:CounterStrike? by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Something about the woodgrain on my desk one year at school caused a funny little issue with the first generation Intellimouse Explorers. If I quickly moved the mouse up or down and to the right, it would perpetually track up or down and to the right, meaning that I could put my CS character into a constant spin without touching the mouse. I used to like to do this on top of a dead body if I got a particularly sweet kill. It was kind of like my victory dance.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  16. Video games suck as training. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All you learn is how to move a mouse/controller.

    I think that we should support any terrorist who wants to use a video game as "training". It will make them that much easier to capture.

    1. Re:Video games suck as training. by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So true, anyone who thinks that CS will prepare you for accurately shooting a weapon, or pressure under fire, is on crack.

      You want to learn to shoot? Spend 8 hours a day in shooting positions snapping in for a week. You want pressure and anxiety? Get arrested in Tijuana.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Video games suck as training. by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      If you had bother reading. They train with real guns, but are using video games to train tactics.
      Which can make sense.

    3. Re:Video games suck as training. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      None of that is necessary to interrupt shipping in the Gulf. All one needs is a antiship missile or two. Alternatively, a cluster of anti-ship mines dropped overnight in the ship path will be nearly as effective.

      Hezbollah showed the world that terrorist organisations both have this kit and the capability to use it. No need to play silly first person shoot-em-ups. In fact the question nowdays is not an "if it will happen", it is "when".

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:Video games suck as training. by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      That sounds like my co-worker's attitude towards UT.

      Him: "I need to learn to dodge and evade."
      Other: "Didn't they teach you that in the military?"
      Him: "Not with a keyboard and mouse."

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    5. Re:Video games suck as training. by Frymaster · · Score: 1

      So true, anyone who thinks that CS will prepare you for accurately shooting a weapon, or pressure under fire, is on crack.

      including these guys?

    6. Re:Video games suck as training. by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Yes. Doubleyes.

    7. Re:Video games suck as training. by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That game isn't training, it is propaganda.

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    8. Re:Video games suck as training. by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or more accurately, recruitment propaganda.

    9. Re:Video games suck as training. by diersing · · Score: 1
      I think that we should support any terrorist who wants to use a video game as "training". It will make them that much easier to capture.

      Agreed, no doubt from all the pot smoking they'll be lethargic and little hungry as well. What? I thought everyone playing CS did so high...

    10. Re:Video games suck as training. by Gunny101 · · Score: 1

      The best way to train is tactical paintball. This is what a lot of the SWAT teams use to, position, communicate, and get used to the weapons handling. Paintball weapons are very simular to regular ones, except they are less accurate and have less distance (far less). However, it is perfect for close quarter team training. That beats Counter-Strike 10,000%, unless you want to see terrorists jumping around with knives for speed.

    11. Re:Video games suck as training. by Kagenin · · Score: 1

      Indeed. But it should be noted that the Army does keep track of recruits who played AA, and found that they tended to do better in Advanced Marksmanship training than recruits who hadn't been exposed to AA.

      --
      "All warfare is based on deception."
      Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
    12. Re:Video games suck as training. by mdhoover · · Score: 1
      It will make them that much easier to capture

      Or at least clean up after they try to rocket jump to the second story of a building
    13. Re:Video games suck as training. by hey! · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is not that you will learn to handle a weapon, but that you will learn to think about when and where to use them in conjunction with other team members. In other words as tactical simulation.

      However, games do have their limitations for training tactics.

      One of the less appreciated reasons for the extinction of knighthood as a practical institution was the role played by its most cherished game: the tournament. Theoretically one of the functions of the tournament was to keep knight's military skills honed by continual practice of arms. And in some ways it worked; knights had formidable skills in handling arms. But the problem with the game was that it corrupted their tactics to the point that the better a knight was as knight, the worse he was as a soldier. For the successful knight, the aim of warfare became winning the game: fame, glory and exacting ransom. The stunning early successes of England over France in the Hundred Years War were largely attributable to the superiority of French knights in the values of chivalry.

      Among other things, the best French knights made a disastrous pledge never to retreat. In the tournament, running away meant disgrace and losing the opportunity of ransom. In warfare, it means leaving a position of tactical disadvantage so you can look for a place of tactical advantage. Skillful retreat is as valuable as skillful attack in the hands of an able commander; it was perhaps one of General Washington's most successful tactics in the American Revolution.

      It may be that video games are better training for warfare than tournaments -- at least for suicide squads. But it's worth remembering that games are designed for entertainment, not training. The designer's aim is for the player to live out a fantasy;,. The "realism" is only skin deep, it's there to make the fantasy more believable, not more accurate.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Video games suck as training. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, we can thank allah that none of the terrorist leaders would also think it worthwhile to train their little fellows in actual weapon training as well, and to simply use the computer game as a group startegy simulation.

    15. Re:Video games suck as training. by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      That game isn't training, it is propaganda.

      Well, it had a negative effect on me after I was killed by "friendly" fire after lobbing a smoke grenade into a room that was suspected of being a hideout, as preparation to bursting in. :-/

    16. Re:Video games suck as training. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Date: Monday, 02 Oct 2006 09:21:04 +0100
      Message-Id
      From: Bomber4
      To: Big Daddy
      Subject: Mission failure

      OMFG! Teh Marines are fucking camping whores!!!!

    17. Re:Video games suck as training. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Date: Monday, 02 Oct 2006 09:21:04 +0100
      Message-Id <ahlalallalala.boomboomboom@al-queda.com>
      From: Bomber4 <achmed@al-queda.com>
      To: Big Daddy <obl@al-queda.com>
      Subject: Mission pwned

      OMFG! Teh Marines are fucking camping whores!!!!

      --
      The preview button is your friend.

    18. Re:Video games suck as training. by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      Marksmanship is about the only place it makes a difference. It trains you to work with the natural rise and fall from breathing, and how to time your shots just right. Course, that doesn't train you to carry the weapon without shooting your foot off, or how to reload, or how to take care of the weapon. But if the simulation is realistic enough, you can get some worthwhile marksmanship training, and for cheaper then a couple boxes of bullets.

      I play a lot of first person shooters, and I also recently got my Expert Marksmanship ribbon from the Air Force for shooting 45/50 with an M-16. I'm also a decent shot with a semi-automatic pistol, and with a revolver. I may just be a good shot and games don't have anything to do with it, or maybe they do.

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  17. RTFA at least, someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good lord, apparently neither the submitter nor the editor (natch) read the article - there's no suggestion that this is actually being used to train anyone, any more than maps involving blowing up something in a middle eastern country are being used to train armies of nacho-eating 15 year-old super troops.

  18. "Counter Strike?" by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm confused... is this actually the CounterStrike we all know and love, or is it some game created by an Iranian company that happens to share the same name? And if it's the former, are we talking about some kind of mod for it, designed by terrorists, or did some jackass just get the box copy, see the option to play as "terrorists," and call in the press?

    1. Re:"Counter Strike?" by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      It's just a downloadable level, designed after a terrorist target in Iran.

    2. Re:"Counter Strike?" by julesh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Congratulations. You've just read the most exemplary case of "fact-checking required" published by an international news agency since... well... probably a few hours previously, actually.

      Basically, it looks as though Reuters have simply translated an article from another language, tried to understand what the hell it was going on about, and printed the results. They've missed that the game isn't a new Iranian game called Counterstrike, but (presumably) a mod for the existing game of that name.

      But it's the third to last paragraph that really shines for me...

      A popular U.S. game, called "U.S. attacks Iran" or "Assault on Iran" and made by Kuma Reality games, revolved around a special forces mission to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities.

      Err... couldn't decide how to tranlate the name back to English, so decided to use both possible translations, eh?

      Anyway. Kuma games. I've only ever heard of them once before, and thought the review was rather fun.

      Next task: Blow up the centrifuge. So back you go, and weirdly you can't blow up the centrifuge by pumping 40mm grenades into it. You expend all the 40mm grenades on hand. Did anyone think to bring along any C4? No, I thought you packed it! You knew we were going to have to blow up a centrifuge and no one brought any C4? What kind of chickenshit outfit is this? No C4. Oh well. But! Happy thing, just a few rifle rounds makes the centrifuge blow up. Task complete!
  19. Goose v Gander by MrSquishy · · Score: 0

    IAAATT (I, apparently, am a terrorist trainee), so I might not be credible, having played on both sides of Counter-Strike. Are they also trying to say that in addition to training elite terrorists, they are also training some of the best counter-terrorism operatives in the world? Clearly there is no better training than these games. Eh hem, "Simulators". Clearly, the solution to the war on terror is as simple as crying "TEAMS" and auto-assigning everyone.

  20. Actually.... Re:Why, YES! by Nananine · · Score: 1

    Actually, America's Army IS used for training, specifically as a primer for basic training and getting used to a drill sergeant. I mean, they're not using it to "KILL TERRORISTS" or anything, which would make sense because that would be the worst training sim ever. But as for a training primer, it'd probably work pretty well. Remember Marine Doom? One of the first serious games. It may not have seemed like much, but it was mostly for training soldiers on coordinating squad movements.

  21. there's still hope... by captain_cthulhu · · Score: 1

    my God. the bane of gamers has become the USA's last hope... lag.

    --
    certified elipsis abuser
  22. In other news... Books... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that's right. Books have also been used to train terorrists.

    Now, go run off to your Salamander and start protecting yourself.

  23. In other news by spinkham · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a recent report, it was discovered that toilet paper is used by terrorists during training.
    Free yourselves from the potential dangers of terrorism by burning all your TP!

    --
    Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yuck. Paper.

      Paper is only used in western countries. Elsewhere they use water to thoroughly WASH. It gets all squeaky clean.

      I'm pretty sure a terrorist's ass is cleaner than a GI's ass.

      Paper! Yuck. Who came up with THAT idea?

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt just rinsing it gets it very clean (for example, rinsing doesn't help my dishes much), and who wants smelly ass water splashed all over the place

    3. Re:In other news by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      I need TP for Bunghole....
      I am Cornholio!

      Are you threatening me?

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    4. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and who wants smelly ass water splashed all over the place

      You must be new to the Internet.

  24. It's propaganda, not training by ConfusedSelfHating · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's designed to inflame Muslim passion against the United States and the Western world. The Iranian government in particular wants to distract its population from the failing economy. The radical president of Iran was elected to fix economic woes, but he has been sidetracked by international conflict. It's also meant as a threat: bomb Iran and we will cut off your oil supply. Only in the mind of Jack Thompson do video games train people to become professional killers.

    I strongly doubt that the Iranians would not use Iranian special forces to accomplish such a mission and instead use a 15 year old kid who played the game two times. Instead they want the kid to join the Iranian military or just shut up about the poor Iranian economy.

    1. Re:It's propaganda, not training by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's also meant as a threat: bomb Iran and we will cut off your oil supply.
      Attacking Iran is quite possibly the worst mistake the U.S. could make.

      Iran wouldn't just bottle up Hormuz, they'd have their extremist buddies throughout the Middle East attacking oil pipelines and refineries. Not to mention they'd start shunting serious money to the insurgents in Iraq & Afghanistan.

      Oil prices would spike, violence would escalate, 2 countries would be further destabilized...

      There's a reason the U.N. is telling America to pipe down and stop making threats.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:It's propaganda, not training by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      Is this some satire that went over peoples heads?
      "It's (This story is) designed to inflame American passion against Iran and the Muslim world. The American government in particular wants to distract its population from the failing economy. The radical president of America was elected to fix economic woes, but he has been sidetracked by international conflict."

      Or is that just unintentionally funny... Your post could easily be about the news story about the game and not the actual game itself.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    3. Re:It's propaganda, not training by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The Iranian government in particular wants to distract its population from the failing economy. The radical president of Iran was elected to fix economic woes, but he has been sidetracked by international conflict."

      There are some serious spelling errors here. You misspelled "American" as "Iranian" and "the USA" as "Iran".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    4. Re:It's propaganda, not training by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      No spelling error here: WHOOOOOOSH!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:It's propaganda, not training by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, we're all doomed in any case:

      > Attacking Iran is quite possibly the worst mistake the U.S. could make.
      They've been doing it covertly for years.

      > Iran wouldn't just bottle up Hormuz, they'd have their extremist buddies throughout the Middle East attacking oil pipelines and refineries.
      They're doing it already.

      > Not to mention they'd start shunting serious money to the insurgents in Iraq & Afghanistan.
      They're doing it already.

      Oil prices would spike, violence would escalate, 2 countries would be further destabilized...
      > It's happening already.

      Small points of light are that:
      - Iran has little oil refining capability and needs to export it via other countries (via the Straits of Hormuz....) even for domestic use
      - Rafsanjani has personal business interests in refined oil importation

      Unfortunately I can't seem to find any figures for those 2 nuggets, but they've been quoted many times and by Iranian bloggers (guessing they know more about Iran then we do) - maybe someone more deft with Google can attach some relevant links

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    6. Re:It's propaganda, not training by inKubus · · Score: 2

      Attacking Iran is quite possibly the worst mistake the U.S. could make.

      You assume that our representatives have US in mind. See, while it would be bad for the American People, it would not be bad for say.. the director of an oil company.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    7. Re:It's propaganda, not training by dbIII · · Score: 1
      >Attacking Iran is quite possibly the worst mistake the U.S. could make.

      They've been doing it covertly for years.

      Do you have any evidence of this? Oh wait - it's secret. Do you really think the US intelligence forces are capable of running a James Bond superspy operation in that part of the world when they don't even have enough translators? Are they waiting for it to head all the way back to full democracy before putting in a monstrous puppet like when they did have the resources?

      So what has been going on? Not much. The last time the USA was involved in a war with Iran it went were badly due to poor resource deployment and at least one incompetant naval commander. When the USA sent naval forces into the Persian gulf in support of Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war they did not send minesweepers - so one destroyer was disabled by a WWI surplus mine from Tsarist Russia which led to the tactic of following in the wake of Iraqi oil tankers and let the tankers they were supposed to protect take the mines. One US destroyer was mistakenly sunk by an Iraqi aircraft with an exocet missile - a lot of US sailors died on that vessel. One US captain shot down a large passenger airliner on it's normal schedule and flightpath by mistake - which later resulted in payback with a Pan Am airliner being blown up by terrorists most likely in the pay of Iran. The captain was hailed as a hero in the spin that was applied, but he was never given another command.

  25. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to resurrect the term "right wing conspiracy."

  26. Train? by Khuffie · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Where in the article does it say the game is used to 'train' terrorists? Where does it mention the word 'terrorists' for that matter?

    It's a friggin' game. A lot of US-made games show conflicts in areas in the Middle East. Oooh. Terrorist training!

    1. Re:Train? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it never mentions terrorists. The "Iran = Terrorist" association appears to have been made by the person who submitted the story. It is sad to see the US propaganda machine working so well.

    2. Re:Train? by x3nos · · Score: 1

      FTA

      The game, "Counter Strike", invites players to plant two bombs on the oil tanker to sink it and make the strait of Hormuz impassable, the Jomhouri-ye Eslami daily reported. About two-fifths of globally traded oil passes through the channel.

      From Wiktionary

      terrorism

      1. The deliberate commission of an act of violence to create an emotional response from the victim in the furtherance of a political or social agenda.
      2. Violence against civilians to achieve military or political objectives.
      3. A psychological strategy of war for gaining political or religious ends by deliberately creating a climate of fear among the popuation of a state.

      Sounds kinda like terrorism, huh? Don't know about you but that kind of strict literalism taken from journalism is the reason why we all cower in fear and give deference to an administration that steals our civil liberties and keeps us from being able to speak out for our own freedom and civil rights.

      However, IMO: This is more rhetoric hijacking (no pun intended) the terrorism script to further the agenda of those that would like to see games like CS removed from the public domain. And TFA makes it seem like CS is a 'new' game, intentionally developed to train terrorists (or if you prefer the previous posters viewpoint, militants of the Iranian persuassion).

      Utterly crap, irresponsible journalism

      --
      /* somewhat functional - fix later */
  27. Real Terror by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Videogames might or might not be used to train "terrorists". Until there's actual evidence of an Iranian training videogame, rather than just scary announcements by a controlled Iranian news organization, all we're sure of is that Iran is threatening to block the straits one way or another.

    Of course, the US has sent a nuclear aircraft carrier, the Enterprise, to the region, possibly to confront Iran directly - the Enterprise as instrumental in "Operation Praying Mantis", the largest surface naval battle since WWII, between the US and Iran in the Persian Gulf in 1988. So the threats are flying thick and heavy in both directions.

    But this is no videogame. The people who will die and get maimed will be real. Everyone has to look away from the screens and at the reality to see that this story is part of the propaganda war between the US and Iran, and recognize our own roles perpetuating and even escalating it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Real Terror by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      I had no idea reuters was "a controlled Iranian news organization"..

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    2. Re:Real Terror by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Now who is being naive? Everyone knows the "liberal media" is really controlled by a cabal of fundamentalist Muslims...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Real Terror by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      All of the Reuters info about the game comes from a single Iranian report.

      FTA: "The game, "Counter Strike", invites players to plant two bombs on the oil tanker to sink it and make the strait of Hormuz impassable, the Jomhouri-ye Eslami daily reported."

      Reuters didn't even remark on the videogame called "Counterstrike" so popular in the US and elsewhere. It just picked up an Iranian report, entirely likely just propaganda vaporware, and created a story about it.

      I didn't say that Reuters was "a controlled Iranian news organization". But if it can be made to produce a story that gets such wide circulation just from an uncorroborated story from a controlled Iranian news organization, I'd say it's pretty well controlled, at least in this instance - and probably others.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Real Terror by mrogers · · Score: 1
      But this is no videogame. The people who will die and get maimed will be real.
      Only on Slashdot would you be modded Offtopic for pointing this out...
    5. Re:Real Terror by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I think I got mod'ed "Offtopic" merely for pointing out that the Reuters story is mainly part of the US/Iran propaganda efforts to scare Americans for political power: terrorism.

      To make matters worse, I pointed out how Reuters was just reprinting an uncorroborated story floated by an Iranian propaganda outlet, which underscores the US/Iran(/UK) cooperation in terrorizing us.

      And to seal the fate, I pointed out that this alleged videogame is so far vaporware, pissing off all the gamers who got their hopes up.

      Even so, the appropriate response from all those cowards would be mod'ing me "Flamebait", as their more aggressive fellow cowards flamed me rather than face their fears.

      Yep, another day at Slashdot.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  28. The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the real story being overlooked here is US dependance on foreign oil. Reduce that, and any threats against trade routes become less and less impacting.

  29. US proud to announce another step against terror.. by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gentlemen, it's time we declared a war on food.

    For far too long, food has been aiding and abeting terrorists all over the world. It makes them stronger and healthier, keeping them in a dangerously potent condition. Studies conducted throughout history show that as stockpiles of food decrease, the morale and will of an enemy grows lower. We cannot afford to lose this vital tool in the war for freedom.

    I hereby ask all Americans to voluntarily discard any food they are in possession of before it falls into the hands of the terrorists. Food has betrayed us by helping our enemies, and we can show no quarter. Remember, if it's not with us, it's with the terrorists.

  30. Piggybacking by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Could it be that part of the motivation behind this article is the "murder simulator" argument some of the anti-gaming pundits have been trolling around since the Columbine incident? Maybe they're hoping to score points with voters by tying the "terrorism" angle in with the recent rash of school shootings to make their position seem more epic than it really is...

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  31. Food used to train terrorists!!! by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    I have learned that the preperation and consumption of food based nourishment is an essential part of terrorist training!
    I pray the government will legislate against food ASAP! If you aren't against food, you are for terrorism!

    1. Re:Food used to train terrorists!!! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "Every time you eat, the terrorists win!"

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  32. So what? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    So what?

    The US have plenty of "antiterrorist" video games.

    The US have plenty of nukular weapons.

    Why are the yankees allowed to have video games and not the iranians?

    Why are the yankees allowed to have nukular weapons and not the iranians?

    1. Re:So what? by usrusr · · Score: 1

      "as every other people of the world the iranian people have the undeniable right to use violent video games for peaceful purposes!" heh, i want him to say that in some hyped up speech in front of the UN

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    2. Re:So what? by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      Because Iranians are terrorists that hate freedom and want nothing more than to destroy everyone and everything. While we are freedom loving, do no wrong Americans who are the only ones who can really be trusted to have nukes and killing machines and video games because obviously we'd never use them maliciously or without being provoked, obviously...

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    3. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why are the yankees allowed to have nukular weapons and not the iranians?

      Because Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which means no nuclear weapons for the Iranians.

      I just OWNED you.

    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Iranians are not pursuing nuclear weapons. They are processing nuclear fuel for power generation as is their right under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty

    5. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just OWNED you.

      Hardly, Mr Coward.

    6. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I am relatively confident the authors of this had you in mind when they made it.

    7. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not "allowed" to have nukes. We got 'em first, that's all. Who's gonna take them away?

    8. Re:So what? by Mursk · · Score: 1
      Yeah, what's this 'nuclear' treaty, anyway? We were talking about nukular weapons, for God's sakes.

      Try to stay on topic...

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    9. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And let the Annonymous Coward bashing begin!

  33. violent computer games create criminals by lorg · · Score: 1

    Just another hit piece in the tired old line of 'violent computer games create criminals' articles. Cause we all know that it is a fact that a few hours of GTA will turn you into a car stealing thug that goes on killing sprees, just as Counter Strike teaches you how to blow shit up and take hostages.

    But as with most things they only need to find one example to prove their theory while all the other non-violent players fade into the background.

  34. Nope. by khasim · · Score: 4, Informative
    They train with real guns, but are using video games to train tactics.
    Which can make sense.

    Nope. They won't learn anything more about tactics than they would reading a book.

    To train tactics, you have to practice the tactics with your team. Video game characters all have the same characteristics. People do not. The biggest differences are speed and grace/clumsiness.

    And that doesn't even address the issue that most terrorist's "tactics" at the moment are "strap on the bomb, walk to the target and detonate yourself". If you're in a CS-type firefight, you've already fucked up the mission.
    1. Re:Nope. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      You're right on the fact that all the video game characters in a game like CS:S have the same speed, height, etc. However, if you have a real team on each side of the game, it can indeed help you develop teamwork, teach you what you should be aware of in an urban setting, and how to be aware of things like ammo supply and grenades.

      It's not REALISTIC, of course - CS:S is more of a shoot'em'up type game. Perhaps America's Army would be a better represnetation of squad combat. But just the same, I play paintball from time to time and I do feel as though I have an advantage over some of the guys because I've trained with video games like AA and CS:S, and I know where to hide, when to shoot, and all sorts of things combat related.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    2. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you're in a CS-type firefight, you've already fucked up the mission.

      There, you forgot to properly emphasize the most important insight. Computer games are not good training instruments because they are designed to be interesting, fun, entertaining. They're GAMES. If they actually dealt with hard problems in any respect, nobody would buy and play them.

    3. Re:Nope. by bunions · · Score: 1

      > Nope. They won't learn anything more about tactics than they would reading a book.

      The Army and USMC seem to disagree, as they have reasonably well-developed pilot programs to use COTS videogames and adapt them to serve as squad-level tactics simulators. It's not the only form of training, of course, nor will it ever take the place of actually crawling around in the mud, but there is evidence that it's better than classroom-only instruction.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    4. Re:Nope. by rekka · · Score: 1

      > Nope. They won't learn anything more about tactics than they would reading a book.

      Lets burn those friggin' books!

    5. Re:Nope. by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

      To train tactics, you have to practice the tactics with your team. Video game characters all have the same characteristics. People do not. The biggest differences are speed and grace/clumsiness."

      Actually, the Counter-Strike I played was human vs human. No AI involved. You train your team against another team.

      That said, though I was fairly good at the game after a lot of online time, I don't feel like a competent terrorist. If anything, I feel like less inclined (if ever I were inclined) because I see how easy it is to get killed without even seeing the enemy, Suffice to say that if terrorists are using CS to learn the art of terror tactics, I feel safer.

    6. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I know where to hide, when to shoot, and all sorts of things combat related.

      Sorry, kid, but when everyone's standing around snickering, it's not about some childish boob joke, it's about the fact that you're still 2 inches taller than the crate you're kneeling behind. Just because you can't see over it doesn't mean we can't.

    7. Re:Nope. by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      You campin ass bitch =P

    8. Re:Nope. by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      I'll set the oven for 451 F for you.

    9. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Nope. They won't learn anything more about tactics than they would reading a book.


      Next comes banning all books that could be a resource for terrorists. Say goodbye to any chemistry texts and military magazines

      They train with real guns

      How much longer before gun control becomes a "terrorist" issue?

    10. Re:Nope. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      What game store can I get these COTS videogames at?

    11. Re:Nope. by bunions · · Score: 1

      any of them. COTS = Commercial Off The Shelf.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    12. Re:Nope. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Err. I dropped a word. Found it stuck to the casters on my chair. I meant the *adapted* versions.

    13. Re:Nope. by bunions · · Score: 1

      I don't think they're available. I mean, they're USMC training aids. Generally they don't share that stuff.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  35. video game training by fi.badkarma · · Score: 1

    having spent 10 years in the military, training (and deploying) for war, i can attest to the fact that video games (i'm also a big-time gamer) cannot train someone for war. sure, you can get some great ideas from the minds of video game story writers, and movie script writers, but a video game in no way prepares you for rounds buzzing past your face in a 2 hour firefight. but i agree it would make a great map - maybe for BF2

  36. Civilization by polyomninym · · Score: 1

    Violent RTS games are influencing our leaders. These games are teaching our government about invading territories for the sake of resource control. Someone call Jack.

    1. Re:Civilization by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      ... Someone call Jack.

      Jack Bauer or Jack Shephard?

      --
      So say we all
  37. "America's Army" videogame is the same thing by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So Iran's government likes a video game about blowing up its enemies' stuff. "America's Army" is a piece of American propaganda about killing its enemies and blowing stuff up. Different enemies, but it's still militarist propaganda. And just because it's from your political opponents doesn't make it terrorism - blowing up civilians to cause fear is terrorism, but blowing up oil tankers to stop your enemies from having access to oil is just war. Back during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, Iraq couldn't ship oil through the Gulf because of Iranian attacks on ships - most of it went by truck down through Jordan.

    ..

    In contrast, Doom is about blowing up monsters while remembering not to use the rocket launcher in enclosed spaces, and you get to use cool weapons like a BFG-9000.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:"America's Army" videogame is the same thing by phorm · · Score: 1

      Is America's Army open source? Perhaps we can give the source to both, let the two happily modify it for "training" or whatever stupid purpose they come up with, and then in the end we have a really good, open, free FPS :-)

    2. Re:"America's Army" videogame is the same thing by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      And just because it's from your political opponents doesn't make it terrorism...

      Yes it does. Haven't you been watching the news lately? If we don't like something then it has to be terrorism.

      *sigh* It's McCarthyism all over again.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  38. Well at least by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    CTs can use it to train too.

  39. Re:US proud to announce another step against terro by vittal · · Score: 1

    Indeed. In fact, food kills more Americans than terrorists:

    Report on Injuries in America, 2003 (http://www.nsc.org/library/report_injury_usa.htm)
    Leading Causes of Unintentional Injury Deaths United States, 2003

    Motor Vehicle 44,800
    Falls 16,200
    Poisoning 13,900
    Choking 4,300
    Drowning 2,900
    Fires, flames, and smoke 2,600
    Suffocation 1,200

    I'm not sure if fast food was counted in the poisoning death toll, but I'm pretty sure the majority of choking would be on food :)

  40. U.S. training terrorists? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
    So does this mean that the U.S. Army is training terrorists because they have produced this video game?


    (For those thinking to mod me Troll or Flamebait, look up the word sarcasm)

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  41. Cheat/Hack? by suprnova · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they play on VAC-Secured servers? Damn haxx0rs!

    --
    --"The revolution will be simulcast..."--
  42. How many have read the article? by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are people in such an uproar about this acting as if Iranians can't play Counter Strike? There's a lot of clueless folks commenting on this...

    As for a potential cultural aspect of this? I'm sure some Islamic groups make an uproar anytime Muslims are shown as "terrorists" in popular western games. It happens on both sides, just because you only see one side of it doesn't mean that the other side is sitting still.

    For God's sake, these are the same people who burn churches and embasseys when a cartoon comes out of their main prophet, do you really think CS missions like Arab Streets simply go by unnoticed in their culture.

    The bottom line is that no one is banning a single thing (that takes care of about 20% of the posts I've read so far), no one is doing anything different today than they have in the past and...

    VIDEO GAMES STILL SUCK FOR LEARNING HOW TO USE FIREARMS!!

    Let's not take this too seriously. There's nothing substantial to see here aside from people who are making this into something that it simply isn't.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  43. I support this all the way... by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    They're using Counter Strike to train???
    Awesome. I couldn't ask for a better combat simulation... except maybe frogger.
    So now we'll have to be on the lookout for terrorists standing hovering in the air with 1" of their feet touching hanging signs, making 100yd headshots with Mac10s, and never using grenades since they only kill in about a 5-10' radius? Or maybe they'll just buy an AWM and shoot it into the side of a mountain our guys are behind, hoping to hit one with the amazing 50' of stone-penetrating .338 Lapua?

    Boy, the first time these guys try to apply their "training" to the real world, we're gonna see some world-class comedy!

  44. Video Games != Terroism by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

    This is just an election year bid to link something the public fears but cannot be dealt with (terroism) with something the public fears and can be dealt with (video games). If Video Games == Terrorism, then if we stop video games we can stop terroism.

    Please stop listening to anything anyone says when they are up for election.

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
    1. Re:Video Games != Terroism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just an election year bid to link something the public fears but cannot be dealt with (terroism) with something the public fears and can be dealt with (video games). If Video Games == Terrorism, then if we stop video games we can stop terroism.

      If you RTFA'd, you should know that the report is from a state-run Iranian newspaper. Presidential elections in Iran were in 2005. I think the next Parliamentary elections there are in spring 2007, but I'm not sure.

      So the report is probably politically motivated, but I don't think it's associated with any particular election.

  45. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you say "pwned" in Arabic? :-)

  46. Still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing will change

    "Counter-Terrorists win"

  47. I hope they are training with CS by brennz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CS is nothing like real life.

    First of all, lets talk about weapons.
    M249 SAW, IRL this is the best weapon at the squad level. High cylic rate, accuracy like an M240 but light enough to easily run with, has a bipod. Great for 3-5 round bursts. You could say that an M4/M16 with an M203 attached might be overall more versatile, but still not so great at killing people. In CS, an M249 is the worst weapon you can choose, IRL the best. Don't argue with me on this, I've shot in excess of 10,000 rounds using an M60, and several thousands using both the m16, m4, m249 and M240G (was a machine gunner while active duty).

    CS teaches people nothing about trigger pulling, breathing, good shooting form, proper ways to rush, pegging a target, etc. There is no concept of rolling in CS, no idea of the prone position, and the list goes on and on.

    CS teaches nothing about operating at the true squad tactics in urban/MOUT operations.

    Night vision in CS? lol. The US is so experienced at night ops, we actually want to do operations then.

    Tactics? jump in, bunny hop, squat shoot strafe, squat shoot. I'd love to see some fundies try that against the US marines/army. They'll get those 40 virgins alot sooner lol.

    Iran should keep in mind, their core competentcy is in terrorism and spouting anti-semetic hogwash, not confronting enemies in a real state vs. state conflict on the battlefield. It isn't like Israel is ready to drop the bomb on them already.

  48. What next? Dune 2? by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

    To prepare for the next desert storm?

  49. Re:US proud to announce another step against terro by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1

    Forget choking! All you have to do is count "McDonald's" as "food", and then look at heart disease statistics... :-P

  50. what? by Bizzeh · · Score: 1

    a controlled situation, with no chance of anything unexpected, that has spessific set rules, is used to trail for real life, uncontrolled chaos situation where there are practicaly no rules.

    i was wondering what they were gonna blame terrorism on next, and i was also wondering what they were gonna use to say "video games are bad" next.

  51. What would Jack Thompson do? by Kodros · · Score: 1

    Somewhere in Miami, he is starting his defense plan for the terrorists. In the end, Take Two will still somehow get sued.

  52. This helps Iran? How? by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > The game illustrates a warning by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,
    > who said in June that oil exports in the Gulf region could be seriously endangered
    > if the United States made a wrong move on Iran

    Eh. Maybe he intended that as a threat, maybe not. Either way, the best way to deal with it is to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume it's not a threat. Such an action would only *harm* Iran (as well as some other nations that also ship oil and stuff through there) and would gain them nothing, and it would harm Iran far more than it would harm the US. If I were developing the official US position on his statement, my interpretation would be that he apparently believes the US might itself do something to endanger oil exports (e.g., by using more domestic oil and importing less), and that the Iranian government would interpret such an action as a "wrong move". That would be a much more sensible and coherent position than the one the article seems to imply he is taking.

    As a terrorist threat, disrupting the Strait of Hormuz wouldn't even be scary, except to a handful of Arab nations. If a threat of terrorism was what he intended, wouldn't he at least have threatened the Suez? That would at least worry Europe, economically speaking, and would be more worrisome to the US than threatening Persian Gulf shipping.

    Not that there wouldn't be an impact at all. I mean sure, the price of oil would go up a bit, for a few months. But it would be no worse than they could accomplish by just reducing their oil production and selling less (or none), if they were willing to do so. Gas would probably go up again, but we'd live through it. Iran's economy would be in much more dire straits (no pun intended).

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  53. Counter-Strike?! by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Soooo, we can expect terrorists to be trying to snipe while doing a crouching bunny-hop? I guess it will at least make them easier to spot...

    I'd think a better "training" tool would be a Rainbow Six/Rogue Spear type game, where the object is to succeed without the enemy getting a shot off.

    This is total FUD BS. Oh noes! Teh terrorists are using verbal speech to perfect their terrorist tactics!!! Must ban verbal speech!!!1!

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  54. Oh thats easy then... by BobSixtyFour · · Score: 1

    All we need to do is spam fog grenades until they get 0 fps.

    Not to mention we have the aim hacks, wall hacks, and the no clipping cheats.

  55. Not news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doc Ruby -- drama queen

    We've had one or more carriers in that region CONTINUOUSLY since 1991. That's right, for more than 15 years there's been a US carrier battle group near the Persian Gulf. We've continously had smaller surface ships in the Persian Gulf (based in Bahrain) for decades.

    If we were serious about attacking Iran, there would be SIX carrier battle groups in the region (as there was during Gulf War I), not just one. The fact that the Enterprise (our oldest nuclear carrier, btw, not as capable as our newest) is in the area is not an indication that the US military is preparing an attack.

    As for this being the "largest surface naval battle since WWII", oh please, stop the dramatics. It was a piecemeal action where Iran lost a couple frigates, some speedboats, and an offshore rig.

  56. How did this transition from terrorism to Iran? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes, it's well known that Iran wants to close the Strait of Hormuz as a wartime retalliation to a preemptive US attack. I'm quite sure they're training for this now. However, we're talking about a mission of the Iranian national army, not some plain-clothed terrorists. And you can believe me, the government of Iran has much better resources for simulation and training than Counterstrike.

    As for terrorist groups, the tactical mission of closing the Strait of Hormuz is completely out of reach, and even if it weren't, how's Counterstrike going to help them plan? I imagine that sea-borne terrorists would use light boats or diving gear and place improvised mines into the narrow shipping lanes. So how do you propose they use Counterstrike to plan their mission?

    Right, you have no idea. That's because this story, like many others, gets written before anybody thinks about it. This is written simply because it fits the convenient script according to which "They're evil and they're plotting" - which is scare tactic that's supposed to make it easier for us to abandon our freedoms and turn them over to the government.

    1. Re:How did this transition from terrorism to Iran? by enronman · · Score: 1

      Iran imports the majority of the gasoline, diesel, etc. throught the straigt as they don't have the refining capability to refine their own crude. If the shut the outflow down, the inflow will also be shut down.

          That is why Iran if they wanted to shut the straight needs a 3rd party, i.e. a terrorist to shut them down. If they do it direct their country will grind to a halt. Even if they do it indirectly they may still get blamed. And no gasoline will cause a fair deal of social unrest. The prospect of a closure is over-estimated from many people.

    2. Re:How did this transition from terrorism to Iran? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that Iran doesn't have its own refineries - actually, it's a little surprising to me. But if you're right and they need to import refined fuel, they're in trouble no matter whether or not it's they or a proxy who closes the Strait. But anyway, if shooting does break out, I'm sure the USA will blockade any fuel shipments to Iran - they will just try to make sure their own ships pass. So if Iran really has no native refining capacity, they're really going to be hurt by a protracted war. But even if they did have refineries, they'd probably get bombed anyway, so ....

  57. Kids/Terrorists by bendodge · · Score: 0

    But note that video games don't produce violence in kids, or train them to use guns.

    --
    The government can't save you.
  58. Damn Centipede by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    I knew that game was evil.

  59. It's good enough for OUR military. by WillyPete · · Score: 1

    While it's fairly obvious that FPS's won't make you any better at shooting a gun or improve physical fitness, it does train well for coordinating and communicating amongst teammates. I don't know if they still use these in our own armed forces, but I know that they have in the past.

    They use all sorts of simulations for everything, including firing (it's a lot like the sniping games they have in the arcades now).

    --
    Shaw's Principle: Build a system even a fool could use, and only a fool would want to use it.
    1. Re:It's good enough for OUR military. by julesh · · Score: 1

      How well does a team of bombers (whether suicidal or not) need to communicate anyway? I mean, they might as well train by watching 1950s war films instead, 'cause that'll teach them everything they need to know.

    2. Re:It's good enough for OUR military. by WillyPete · · Score: 1

      I imagine they would need enough coordination to infiltrate and sabotage a heavily guarded facility, if they wanted to be successful.

          A non-interactive movie doesn't let you actually practice, whereas a simulation including headsets and team mates in seperate rooms would be fairly realistic, especially if they edited in a level with the target's layout, and drilled in their movements and commands, threw in unexpected situations to test responses, etc. Just like NASA does. It's not perfect, but it beats nothing.

      --
      Shaw's Principle: Build a system even a fool could use, and only a fool would want to use it.
  60. If you take away the video games... by Maglos · · Score: 1

    the terrorists have already won.

  61. America's Army... by Techguy666 · · Score: 1

    Counter Strike?? If you want to teach terrorists the fine art of teabagging...

    Why hasn't anyone made a stink about "America's Army"? I remember thinking that game was so cool because we could go online and find real soldiers using real military tactics that we could test our skillz against. (Then I realized they were so predictable, they sucked worse than 10 year old noobs and the game got dull.) Wouldn't a game that teaches western combat doctrine with players from the real military be a much more effective training tool for terrorists?

  62. Denial by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Anonymous denial Coward, sending the Enterprise back to the Iranian region in the current saberrattling between the US and Iran is most certainly part of the propaganda war of intimidation. I understand that you didn't click to the Wikipedia article I quoted about what was in fact "the largest surface naval battle since WWII". I understand that you didn't click to the news reports relating the Enterprise deployment to our standoff with Iran.

    Anonymous denial Cowards battle curiosity with ease, refusing to "see for themselves" when they're already so sure of how the world works. "Greeted as liberators" is so much more appealing to armchair generals than "catastrophicly bungled invasion" that they won't even hear about the truth when it's beating against their ears.

    But how could you read my post without understanding the distinction between an attack and just the escalation of deployments? That's what this story is all about.

    You're not just an Anonymous denial Coward. You're damn stupid, too. Exactly the kind of American the Iranians have been beating since they threw out our Shah in their revolution.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Denial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DocRuby:

      Take a few deep breaths and look at the facts.

      The US continuously maintains a carrier in that region. This is not an escalation. We always have one there.

      Carriers need to be refitted periodically and the sailors and airmen need to get home once in a while. So to maintain one carrier on station, we actually need 3 carriers. One on station, one in refit, and the third either en-route or training stateside. All that we're doing with the Enterprise is relieving the carrier that is currently on station. So periodically, an aircraft carrier departs from its home port and relieves the carrier on station. The carrier on station then returns to its home port for rest and refit.

      Furthermore, in the build-up to Gulf War I, we had SIX carriers on station. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War where it reads "The sorties were launched mostly from Saudi Arabia and the SIX coalition aircraft carrier groups in the Persian Gulf." The US would not start a war with Iran with a single carrier battle group in the region -- Iran is a much more populous country than Iraq. We would mass our power first. There are no signs that we have begun such a massing of power.

      As for your link, I did go there. I didn't need to, as I remember the events pretty clearly. But let's go back there and review "the largest surface naval battle since WWII" that you think is so important to interpreting current events. Iran laid mines in the Persian Gulf and nearly sunk a US frigate. In response, the US naval units in the region attacked two oil platforms. Iran responded with piecemeal attacks. That is, they did not mass their forces and perform coordinated attacks. Instead, they sent in their units in a piecemeal fashion and were, not surprisingly, hammered.

      The Iranian losses included: 1) two inoperable oil platforms used for naval intelligence were damaged, 2) six speedboats sunk, 3) one frigate sunk, 4) one frigate sunk, 5) one gunboat sunk. The US lost one helicopter.

      But comparing this to naval battles in WWII is rather silly. The US order of battle was basically the one aircraft carrier battle group, our ships that are normally in the Persian Gulf itself (a command ship, a destroyer, and a frigate or two, tyically based in Bahrain), rounded up with another frigate/destroyer or two. The Iranian order of battle was two frigates, a gunboat, and 1/2 a dozen speedboats.

      It was a small skirmish.

    2. Re:Denial by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're not getting it. After repeated emphasis on the actual point, not your hairsplitting, it's clear you are unable to get it, probably through deliberate denial or at least willful ignorance.

      For others reading this thread confused by your misdirection, I'll repeat the point.

      Sending the Enterprise to the region is important to Iran, as the "small skirmish" was also by far their largest naval engagement, which crushed them. Their response is propaganda (possibly based on a real program, but far from necessarily) announcing a videogame training Iranians to blow up an oil tanker in the straits. This is important to the US because it generates fear of naval warfare in the Straits in the public consciousness. That fear's basis in reality of the real risk is a separate issue. We're talking about terrorism, which is always and only a war in the media, even when it harnesses military or other violent attacks to generate the fear.

      So my point, as I've made from the beginning, is that the US and Iran are already in a war terrorizing each other in specific terms that will affect each other's people. Compared to that, it's immaterial if WWII battles were so much bigger that subsequent battles are relatively small, because they're big enough to register with the targeted audiences.

      The bigger point is that people who hairsplit about technical details dismissing actions after WWII because they're smaller are totally unfit to analyze the strategy of our current Terror War. Pearl Harbor was big, but the WWII it launched the US into was over in under 4 years. 9/11/2001 killed only 3000 Americans, but we've been in that war for over 5 years now, and we're just getting started. Because the people planning it and reporting on it don't get the basic strategic power of terrorism, preferring to focus instead on the violence itself for their own vested interests to the detriment of their jobs. The Terror War that is much more important than historical comparisons of battle scales, because we need to do something to stop it. Which includes recognizing how those past battles condition our expectations of, thereby reactions to, new events largely symbolic, but extremely dangerous.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  63. bin Laden already ordered this. Not much happened. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Bin Laden ordered Al-Qaeda to attack oil facilities several years ago. To date, the attacks consist of an attempt to drive two cars through the outer perimeter fence of a Saudi oil refinery. Two suicide bombers set off their explosives and started a small fire, which was quickly put out.

  64. WTF? by omgamibig · · Score: 1

    "TEHRAN (Reuters) - A new Iranian computer game sets players the task of blowing up a U.S. tanker in the Gulf to block the sea route for much of the world's oil supplies, a newspaper reported on Saturday. The game, "Counter Strike", invites players to plant two bombs on the oil tanker to sink it and make the strait of Hormuz impassable, the Jomhouri-ye Eslami daily reported. About two-fifths of globally traded oil passes through the channel. The game illustrates a warning by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who said in June that oil exports in the Gulf region could be seriously endangered if the United States made a wrong move on Iran." Totally WTF? I don't know where to begin to say what is wrong with that article. Valve anyone? I always thought Reuters would be a bit more ... hm, nvm. Another example of "Never trust any media corp"(TM).

  65. Videogames helpful for training? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if video games are effective tools for teaching and can actually instruct players on how to use guns in real life, then why is the Mario Kart 64 generation still getting in car accidents?

    1. Re:Videogames helpful for training? by Scoth · · Score: 1

      It's not the accidents you have to worry about; it's people chucking turtles at each other on the highway.

  66. Constitutional Endrun? by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I can see this sort of story being used to make an endrun around constitutional free speech protections in the name of national security. I wouldn't at all be surprised to see the likes of Jack Thompson take this approach once the "video games are harmful to children" approach to banning/restricting games runs its course in the courts.

  67. Games vs reality by phorm · · Score: 1

    One participant was heard to comment "what do you mean there's no respawn in the live exercise??!" before stalking off the field. Others were seen to be having difficulties in climbing ladders with carrying several kilograms of weapons and explosives, while still more were seen attempting to bunny-hop their way across open fields.

  68. Sounds good to me by taustin · · Score: 1

    I mean, really, are we afraid of fat, lazy, anti-social islamic facists who live in the basement of their parents' tent? I guess their next tactic will be to bring down our economy by downloading MP3s instead of buying the CDs.

  69. Yes, of course by RomulusNR · · Score: 1
    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  70. as_oilrig by robpoe · · Score: 1

    If all the terrorists are using is Counter Strike and as_oilrig ... I already feel safer.

    Maybe we can show them how to boost through the ceiling. It would be fun to watch Ashad trying to boost his fellow mate through the ceiling :)

    --
    = Grow a brain...
  71. It's true! by Mykid8yours · · Score: 1

    GTA series has trained me to effectively car-jack someone. It has taught me my superb sniping skillz. Lastly, it has help me represent myself as a major crime lord, that is capable of corrupting politics & government/state/federal agencies in my community.

    1. Re:It's true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lets not forget that a simple respary keeps the FBI off your trail for good.

  72. Re:So what is a "right move on Iran"? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    .. from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  73. Google! by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    In all seriousness, Google Earth is probably the most serious threat to national security the world will ever see. Some cities are in real time for crap's sake. While planning a hypothetical attack on my own house I found out paths, shortcuts, and possible hideouts I had never seen before. In 4 years of living here. Outrageous.

    But a video game? And how do they play, "team deathmatch" or "capture the flag"?

    1. Re:Google! by johnsmith_12345 · · Score: 1

      Real time?

      where?

    2. Re:Google! by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      Certain US areas get satellite all the time, such as New York I believe. I am certain I read this when it first came out, but I can't find that data now.

  74. Flight Simulator by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In all seriousness, I used to spend a lot of time on Flight Simulator trying to fly my plane between the two towers of the World Trade Center. It's a lot harder than you might think. Hitting the corner of one of the towers head on must be even harder.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Flight Simulator by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Going in between two structures is significantly more difficult than just running into them. Not only do you have to aim for the right point, but you need to approach from the correct angle.

      Commercial jets are complicated machines, but at the end of the day, they pretty much fly according to the same principles of a small cessna. Turning, climbing, and diving are all basically the same, and as long as you don't have to take off or land, flying a plane is not particularly challenging.

      The more complicated parts of being a pilot are obeying all the rules and regulations, as well as navigating. The terrorist pilots on 9/11 had to figure out the navigating part, but probably weren't all to concerned with following the rules. Once they located the towers, all they had to do was point the plane and start to throttle up. Unless they had second thoughts about killing themselves, it probably wasn't very hard at all.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  75. They Should Be Training With Team Fortress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're using the wrong game. They should be using Team Fortress as perfecting the rocket jump will allow them to easily bypass White House security.

  76. MOD UP by DanTheLewis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And apparently all Iranians are terrorists now, too? I'm looking at you, racist article summarizer.

    --

    Q: What did the comedian say to the crowd?
    A: If I knew, this joke would be funny.
  77. Who Mods This Crap "Insightful?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really - who could mod this moron "Insightful"? Morons with mod points, I guess.

  78. *looks around confused* by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Is Jack Thompson around? Anywhere?

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  79. Fully Instrument-Rated by A+Brand+of+Fire · · Score: 1

    Mike: Yeah. You know, if I had been flying that baby and had a low-altitude flameout like that, I'd just reduce my elevators, dip the nose, and fire up the engine.

    Servo: You don't know how to fly.

    Mike: Sure I do! I'm fully instrument-rated for Microsoft Flight Simulator.

    --
    [End of Line]
  80. It's not OUR Counter-Strike by Neovanglist · · Score: 1

    If you guys would actually READ the arcticle, it's a new game pumped out in three months by an Iranian group. The only thing it shares with our Counter-Stike is a name. And theirs doesn't even have the -. Different game. No need to worry about bunny-hopping BOOM HEADSHOT! ing terrorists, as funny as that would be. Now what we REALLY need to be afraid of is all those PS2s Saddam linked up to launch missles .

  81. Don't stop there!!! by Fei_Id · · Score: 1

    They're using BOOKS too!!! We must burn all books!!! Holy crap we gotta do it fo da cheelrin'

  82. Terrorists can't afford Counterstrike: Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is de_oilrig, and it actually is NOT on Counterstrike: Source yet, much to the dismay of many fans.

    Apparently Terrorists can't afford anything above Counterstrike 1.6.

  83. Q: How do you know they learned on a video game? by Live_in_Dayton · · Score: 1

    A: they try and use up-up-down-down-left-right-left-right-B-A-start to start the mission. Their training will be useless.

  84. its true by Stanneh · · Score: 1

    if you replace videogames with cia.

    --
    I Predict A Riot
  85. It doesn't matter, we have.... by Yelnats1971 · · Score: 1

    ....America's Army!!! I just last night qualified EXPERT on the M16!!! Watch out terrorist, here I come, and apparently I am a pretty good shot!!!!

  86. FUD & hypocrisy by Simulant · · Score: 1



    F#$% Reuters for running this lame ass article with no context, poor research, and sinister implications.

    I'm going to assume for the sake of argument that we're talking about a multi-player game here.

    How many such games produced in the west allow you to kill Muslims/Arabs/Chinese/Vietnamese/Germans/etc... and blow up their strategic assets?

    How many of the gamers who play those games give an ideological shit which side they're playing on? (that's a good question, but I suspect that in the West, and certainly among the people I play online with every day, the number is miniscule)

    And what the hell does this mean:

    "A popular U.S. game, called "U.S. attacks Iran" or "Assault on Iran" and made by Kuma Reality games, revolved around a special forces mission to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities."

    I can only assume that the writer was too lazy to find out what the name of the game actually is. (It's a free game called Kuma\War and most of the downloadable missions take place in Iraq though there is one named "Assault on Iran".) Kuma's website provides the following info:

    "Kuma\War, the first Kuma Reality Game, is a totally free, first and third-person tactical squad-based game that provides multiple updates monthly to the consumer's computer to reflect unfolding events in the real world. Each month Kuma\War subscribers receive playable missions, video news shows, extensive intelligence gathered from news sources around the world, and insight from a decorated team of military veterans.

    At Kuma, we are sensitive and respectful of American and coalition soldiers and the sacrifices they are making every day. We hope that by telling their stories with such a powerful medium that we enable the American public to gain a better appreciation of the conflicts and the dangers they face. As part of our mission, Kuma Reality Games provides military training to the United States Army (contract number 1435-04-05-CT-42872)."

    That's pretty sinister if you ask me. And if it's not, why imply that the Iranian game is?

    Nearly as sinister, the US tax-payer funded game, America's Army, is actually promoted as a US Army recruitment & training tool and is the only multi-player game I'm aware of where no matter which side you choose, you're an American and the other team looks like stereotypical, middle eastern 'terrorists'. (at least they did when I stopped playing it several years ago)

    The existence of America's Army alone justifies the Iranian CounterStrike, assuming it's an actual propaganda tool and not just gamers making games they want to play.

    I love wargames & shooters but I prefer them to be based firmly in historical or hypothetical land and not financed by a government. Wargames based on current events (esp. Govt funded or associated games) creep me out in the same way that pseudo -fictional movies and TV shows about 9/11 or any recent, traumatic event do. I don't trust the motives of their publishers and I won't support them. I'd hope the same from my Iranian counterparts.

  87. No they didn't say that. by Irvu · · Score: 1

    At no point in the article does Reuters say that the game is actually being used to train terrorists. What they say is that the game puts the players in the position of carrying out an attack on a U.S. Tanker. Such an attack, in real life, would be terrorism. It also notes U.S. made games that put the players in the position of blowing up Iranian Nuclear facilities. But it does not suggest that they are being used to train Special Forces operatives in any way.

    The post summary is wrong.

  88. What is this?? Germany early 1930s?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this?? Germany early 1930s??

    There are dozens of CS mods that have one mission: bomb,kill & destroy muslims as game objective. When there is two games developed with missions against us, this is act of terrorism? common!

    An NO. I am not a terrorist. Stupid facist US!

  89. In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A substance going under the name "food" is allegedly being used to keep terrorists healthy and trained. Sources world wide report that it is sold on a regular basis by a variety of stores. Moves should be made immediatly to ban this lethal, liberal terrorist substance from the face of this planet!

  90. No problem! by sheldon · · Score: 1

    I have spent many hours with Battlefield-2 training in counter-insurgency warfare!

  91. This is nothing new by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

    10 years ago, the USMC modified the source for DOOM II for training US Marines in combat tactics. The result was Marine DOOM. Check out the wikipedia article. There are also other games on consumer platforms used by the military to keep troops sharp.

    --
    "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
  92. Re:So what is a "right move on Iran"? by PurPaBOO · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Leave them alone. They're not trying to make a move on you.

    --
    If it weren't for the rocks in its bed, the stream would have no songs.
  93. Internal Al-Qeada Memo by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 1

    Found near the terrorist watercooler:

    Memo to all brothers:

    Hassan has come up with some new training aids and please note that because of these new training aids we have to change our terminology: "Jihad" is now "pwn teh noobs".

    Osama.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
  94. Who's the terrorist? by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    A new Iranian computer game sets players the task of blowing up a U.S. tanker in the Gulf to block the sea route for much of the world's oil supplies, a newspaper reported on Saturday.

    The game, "Counter Strike", invites players to plant two bombs on the oil tanker to sink it and make the strait of Hormuz impassable, the Jomhouri-ye Eslami daily reported. About two-fifths of globally traded oil passes through the channel.

    The game illustrates a warning by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who said in June that oil exports in the Gulf region could be seriously endangered if the United States made a wrong move on Iran.

    Why is this defined as terrorism? This is self defense by a country that doesn't want to be invaded by the United States. If the United States doesn't bomb Iran, Iran won't be sinking any oil tankers in the strait of Hormuz. Iran does not have the sophisticated air force, communications, and naval capabilities of the United States military. It is only natural that they would defend themselves by the means available to them, including economic warfare against the most indebted country in the world.

  95. Everyone is confused about the title by capnez · · Score: 1

    Since the Reuters article doesn't talk about the relation of this software to the Counter-Strike, and was confused myself by an article by the german magazine Der Spiegel, which states that there is no connection. However, having searched Google News and some other search engines, it seems that this Iranian software is in fact a map or mod to Counter-Strike (the Half-Life mod). The best evidence for this I could find was an article supposedly quoting Ahmadreza Nouri, who is apparently one of the designers. I also found some other pages supporting this view.

  96. this will work by gsn · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm... CS makes for very realistic training doesn't it. We can magically appear on the map and select weapons and run and jump around real fast, even if we've gotten shot and when we die we get to fly around, la la la, and see how our teammates are doing against those mean counter terrorists. And what do you know after a few minutes we can start playing all over again despite dying in the previous round, and we even get money for losing!

    I wish terrorists trained with counter strike to get good... I know a 10 year old who could kick all their asses.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  97. Nothing to worry about by grapeape · · Score: 1

    If they are being traied based on counterstrike drone AI then doesnt that work in our favor...assuming our soldiers can think independently and aim straight.

  98. Hydrogen Dollar Time? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Well, from the posturing of leaders of Iran, and the U.S. proving there are more Horses Asses than Horses, it becomes clear why Holliburton is building a pipeline from IRAQ to the Mediterranean; But this is only a short term solution. With more of the world turning to the fossil fuel solution, and the price approaching $4.00 per gallon of gas, here in the U.S.; One has to wonder what the break even point to switch between the oil dollar to the hydrogen dollar is?

  99. Yep. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
    Nope. They won't learn anything more about tactics than they would reading a book.

    To train tactics, you have to practice the tactics with your team. Video game characters all have the same characteristics. People do not. The biggest differences are speed and grace/clumsiness.


    Simulation training isn't about "speed and grace/clumsiness", but about command, control, coordination, procedures, and rehearsal. Simulations can do a very capable job for that.

    The US Army makes a heavy investment in simulation, like the other services, and has an entire command dedicated to simulation training.
    Every Soldier who deploys uses some type of simulation to train critical Warfighting skills. Simulations help our Soldiers hone their skills, rehearse their missions and return to their families safely when their missions are complete. PEO STRI responds quickly to critical, emerging requirements with innovative acquisition and technology solutions and puts the power of simulation into the hands of America's Warfighters!


    It is also worth noting the the 9/11 highjackers trained on simulators in preparation for their mission.
    The three pilots in Florida continued with their training. Atta and Shehhi finished up at Huffman and earned their instrument certificates from the FAA in November. In mid-December 2000, they passed their commercial pilot tests and received their licenses. They then began training to fly large jets on a flight simulator. At about the same time, Jarrah began simulator training, also in Florida but at a different center. By the end of 2000, less than six months after their arrival, the three pilots on the East Coast were simulating flights on large jets.65

    And that doesn't even address the issue that most terrorist's "tactics" at the moment are "strap on the bomb, walk to the target and detonate yourself". If you're in a CS-type firefight, you've already fucked up the mission.

    So, a referee does the scoring instead of the game. Whoop.

    I think it is a potentially fatal mistake to underestimate either the Iranians or the various Islamist extremist terrorists (many of whom are funded by the Iranian government).

    By the way.... did you know that Iranian funded Hezbollah has agents operating in the US?

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Yep. by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Simulations are far different then games. For vehicles simulators make a hell of a lot of sense, especially for early training (better for a pilot to learn in a simulation then crash a multi-million dollar jet). The simulators can be built to be exact replicas of the desired vehicles with real-world physics and conditions that are manipulable on the fly. Also war-games are many times called simulations, as they simulate battles/events (even though it takes place in the real world, just without live munitions).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  100. Gamers as the new Army by Rapter09 · · Score: 1

    So with all of these stories going about of people using videogames to train, making us nerds killers... how come we aren't signing these kids up for the military involuntarily?
    Granted they're all from different countries but I would assume that by getting a large multi-national military force consisting of X'Ds-Grrrr..., SlayerS `BoxeR', [NC]...YellOw, Garimto. These top-dollar commanders would organize and lead this task force with the best strategies and lead us to complete and total victory. Meanwhile, "Team 3D" could form an elite Navy SEAL squad that would eliminate all opposition with insane reflects and perfect KDR.

    Putting things in a real perspective makes it sounds a heck of a lot more ridiculous than any of these articles.

  101. Hard to say by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
    I strongly doubt that the Iranians would not use Iranian special forces to accomplish such a mission and instead use a 15 year old kid who played the game two times. Instead they want the kid to join the Iranian military or just shut up about the poor Iranian economy.

    It is kind of hard to say what they would do now. The Iranian military is much better equipped today than they were in the early '80s, but would they resort to tactics like this again? Who knows? I expect that they would if push came to shove.

    During the Iran-Iraq War, the Ayatollah Khomeini imported 500,000 small plastic keys from Taiwan. The trinkets were meant to be inspirational. After Iraq invaded in September 1980, it had quickly become clear that Iran's forces were no match for Saddam Hussein's professional, well-armed military. To compensate for their disadvantage, Khomeini sent Iranian children, some as young as twelve years old, to the front lines. There, they marched in formation across minefields toward the enemy, clearing a path with their bodies. Before every mission, one of the Taiwanese keys would be hung around each child's neck. It was supposed to open the gates to paradise for them....


    #908 - Iranian Animated Film for Children Promotes Suicide Bombings which aired on IRIB 3 TV on October 28, 2005.

    #371 - Mothers of Hizbullah "Martyrs": We Are Very Happy And Want to Sacrifice More Children "Martyr's Day" On Hizbullah TV Al-Manar TV (Lebanon) November 11, 2004

    Martyr's mother: Compared to others, what I sacrificed is nothing. It's true I sacrificed a son, but others have sacrificed two or three. I hope more of my sons will become martyrs.

    Martyr's mother: Allah be praised. I thank Allah for all the good He has bestowed upon us. He has blessed us with martyrdom. Allah willing, we too will be martyred, just as they did.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  102. Used for training? RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see anywhere in the article where it says this is used to train terrorists. It looks like more of a propagander type game, just like the American Army game that is free. The FA refers to some 'popular' game I've never heard of called 'American Attack on Iran' which is also free.

  103. Criminal by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    Given that a criminal is ANYONE who breaks the law: yes, all of those people were criminals. George Washington, Tito, all criminals. The question is whether being a criminal is a bad thing or not. For example, owning pot is illegal in some countries. Those who have it are criminals. Are they doing anything wrong? Only evil, moronic tyrants with a desperate need to get laid once in a while think so.

    Many criminals are heroes, standing up against laws that have no moral or ethical legitimacy or against rulers without any valid claim to their position. Murdering a tyrant is a heroic criminal act. Blowing pot smoke in a cop's face too (although it's a very impolite heroic criminal act). Shooting the soldiers who invaded your country and destroyed any semblance of peace or prosperity? Definitely heroic and criminal.

  104. POST US A LINK, DAMMIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's cut to the chase

    Where can we download this thing?

    The article says "downloadable to any Iranian household with a mouseclick."

    Well... where?

  105. You can get em from here by Cooliocopter · · Score: 1

    http://www.kobra.ir/ they appear to just be cs maps

  106. Wanna know why this is news? by VTMarik · · Score: 1

    Because games aren't responsible for an Amish kid shooting up his school so they grab some obscure fact from some distant and completely unknown Nut-wing blogger someplace and fold it into the news cycle.

  107. OT Sig. by headkase · · Score: 1

    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous

    That quote is from an old good game called Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri. It's a bit of voice acting from one of the factions, I think it was Provost Zakarov of the University. Or Chairman Yang of the Hive. Anyway it's a bit of voice acting definately from that game. I'd still play it today if I could get it to run on Win XP.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:OT Sig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Commissioner Pravin Lal

    2. Re:OT Sig. by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      The credit for that quote goes to Commissioner Pravin Lal of the Peacekeepers. That title didn't fit in the sig, and I'm not sure who did the writing for AC's characters; therefore anonymous.

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  108. I'd already have blown myself off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...only my terrorist organization standardized on Duke Nukem Forever for its training needs.

  109. Training? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can hardly use a videogame to train someone in military operations. Recruit them, yes (America's Army, anyone), but train them?

  110. In other news... by kg_o.O · · Score: 1

    DoD is considering winmine.exe as minesweeper training software.

  111. Update by norteo · · Score: 1

    Update: Terrorists are using pencils to write down their plans. Please help the world to get rid of every single pencil before its too late.

  112. So? by ineedbettername · · Score: 1

    So what? The US Military's been doing it for years.

  113. The right move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes they are when they foam at the mouth at cartoons of mahomet and ask for the head of anyone who dares think that islam is the most moronic religion ever.

    Can you imagine a medieval Vatican with nukes ? That's what Iran is going to be.

  114. this is so wrong by sniperawd · · Score: 1

    how can they even be allowed to publish these lies... this is why i dont watch any news but fox news and even then it is hit and miss

  115. Training is not Practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one was ever given a licence practice medicine after practicing their stiching on melons. I'm fairly certain that at some point, they were given a real body to try out.

    The whole America's Army thing came out of a Doom mod many years prior, a handful of camps with small groups used the program in a classroom environment to teach effective communication and working as a team. This proved easier than organizing complicated field missions and scattering students where a trainer couldn't keep track of them all.

    However, this wasn't the length and breadth of their training, but it had to make things smoother when they got on the field with honest to goodness guns.

  116. Hey, I Posted this two days ago. by tmjva · · Score: 1

    I sent this in two days ago with detailed links on the Straits. Why does Kalpatin get the credit?

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  117. The story is true by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    Just look at "America's Army".

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction