I could build that, of course I know why putting a desktop CPU in something that I want to run with a battery is a bad idea... I am glad you enjoy your laptop, it seems clear you do not use it anywhere but on your desktop..
My 2007 MBP was about.5" thinner too..
Oh well Asus abandoned the home built laptop market for a reason.
I would rate the two thinkpad's I have received from my employer as the two most shoddily built electronic devices I have ever owned. Complete crap. The things actually just break apart in normal use. I never had one last more than a year with out something breaking off. (with much less than daily use). My heavily used MBPs make it through 3-4 years without anything snapping off somehow.
He is lying, made up a big number to sound cool. Having worked in large environments with both platforms, the tools for managing large OSX deployments are as good or better than Windows and significantly less expensive.
You have not actually shown any facts. The GP is correct all the payloads are prepared in advance. Windows does not survive its pre-made attacks any longer than OSX. You will continue to believe what you want. You will continue to be wrong.
And they like a challenge. There is no press for being the one to hack the Windows systems. Any kid off the street could walk in with his hackomatic script and grab exploit-of-the-day from the mothership and have at it. Microsoft patches faster and they are still losing..
You are confused about a lot of things, but thunderbolt in particular.
Thunderbolt has 2x10Gbps full duplex PCIE channels (40Gbps).
Some have also said that the Thunderbolt actually sends displayport data over discrete channels. I have no idea if this is true, and it does not really matter. It is faster no matter how you slice it.
P.S. I just realized you measure speed differently than the rest of the world. You believe the 330M is faster than the 6750M..
Slashdot Mirror
I am also an
N=7
S=1
and that was a marginally loud fan on an MBP I had replaced.
I could build that, of course I know why putting a desktop CPU in something that I want to run with a battery is a bad idea... I am glad you enjoy your laptop, it seems clear you do not use it anywhere but on your desktop..
My 2007 MBP was about .5" thinner too..
Oh well Asus abandoned the home built laptop market for a reason.
Anybody who thinks $1000 is a lot of money for a laptop needs something..
Yes the Acura is just like the Civic, maybe you should crawl out of your bubble and drive one.
Good thing the standard iPod warranty is a year then... Kind of hard to take the rest of your post seriously.
And of course your MBP price is just a lie...
Interesting comparison, more accurate than you obviously know. I am not sure you intended to prove the point you did.
I would rate the two thinkpad's I have received from my employer as the two most shoddily built electronic devices I have ever owned. Complete crap. The things actually just break apart in normal use. I never had one last more than a year with out something breaking off. (with much less than daily use). My heavily used MBPs make it through 3-4 years without anything snapping off somehow.
Your devices are not rated at 3Gb/s, the sata connection was. This device is..Supporting data transfers of up to 500MB/sec,....
Maybe just read the summary :)
You fail at statistics. Wow. I would dare say, Epic Fail.
Interesting, because the market share of servers running that version of ftpd is significantly less than the desktop OSX market.
Weird. I believe it is impossible anyone took the time to exploit it.
He is lying, made up a big number to sound cool. Having worked in large environments with both platforms, the tools for managing large OSX deployments are as good or better than Windows and significantly less expensive.
(see below).
You have not actually shown any facts. The GP is correct all the payloads are prepared in advance. Windows does not survive its pre-made attacks any longer than OSX. You will continue to believe what you want. You will continue to be wrong.
I agree, with XP that would have been ugly, but Windows 7 would survive that as well as anything.
And they like a challenge. There is no press for being the one to hack the Windows systems. Any kid off the street could walk in with his hackomatic script and grab exploit-of-the-day from the mothership and have at it. Microsoft patches faster and they are still losing..
And hopefully shot.
Give one person we can reference. (Everyone knows you are lying, thats what makes it fun to ask).
So are you saying MS products are more exploited because they are more exploitable? Say it isn't so Joe.
It seems clear that you have never actually used a mac. Good job, your Internet credibility is as compelling as your personality.
The Apple demographic is worth like 50x per hit..
You do realize those store say it has less security tools available because they are unnecessary right?
Link even one. People always make these claims, no one ever backs them up.
HP is the only one that even makes a comparable laptop and it is not half the price..
You are confused about a lot of things, but thunderbolt in particular.
Thunderbolt has 2x10Gbps full duplex PCIE channels (40Gbps).
Some have also said that the Thunderbolt actually sends displayport data over discrete channels. I have no idea if this is true, and it does not really matter. It is faster no matter how you slice it.
P.S. I just realized you measure speed differently than the rest of the world. You believe the 330M is faster than the 6750M..
Neat the summary is a troll. Good Game.
Several developers have indicated Lion does support Trim.
http://www.legitreviews.com/news/10150/
It is funny that someone posting here can be that completely out of touch, lol.