That is not entirely true - in Germany the pimping actually exist and is doing very well indeed. The state does not like freelancing too and that is what escorts do. Still if you want good service you pay up for a sex worker that has the ability and is willing. Then there are escorts where the sex is just one of the services that they offer. That low segments of the market is prone to crime and violence is probably unavoidable. This is however difficult to combat and trafficking is even more difficult - the victims involved are in the country usually illegally which means they will not cooperate with police. All in all it is still better to let people do their business and try to punish the wrong doers (traffickers), it is however more difficult and on top you have a whole bunch of crazy PC watchmen abusing you verbally.
Humans that are not controlled (at least at times) by their genitals? I guess there are not that many. Men want to have sex, women want to have kids. Those humans that do not have such urges do not procreate and thus their genes are not passed over. The whole thing is just as silly as war on drugs and other idiocies coming from the prudes in US of A. When one reads this one wonders for what A really stands for....
Ooooch and the poor women - I would be surprised if these poor women the two hired can be indeed qualified as poor. But this is the same BS as the recent article in TE claiming with big letters big gender pay gap where in fact in the article they clearly show that such gap does not exist while claiming the opposite. All PC propaganda. I wonder how long do we have to tolerate such nonsense?
The revolution is like cleaning your apartment - you do not have to do it every now and then but when it starts to smell and you start seeing pests creeping in every corner it is time to do it. You do not have to be part of it of course. You may chose to be on the status quo side - that is as far as I can tell perfectly ok. the only think that can stop this from happening is either extinction event or technological progress in crowd control to the point it can actually control all the crowds also those of size of 1 too and all the time while preventing violence with non-maiming techniques. In good case revolutions (if not prevented as indicated) may be less violent than they used to be: see former Czechoslovakia etc. Indoctrination is also good.
OT I have a feeling/. got better recently. Articles got little bit more interesting and strangely the inflow of obscenities from disturbed users (or their bots) decreased slightly. I hope the trend holds on.
I think that is a great exaggeration. Bias, lies, ignorance were always part of journalism as people doing it are humans and these are characteristics of human apes. Yet throughout the years there were journalists that fought against the mainstream if they saw a necessity. As there were heroes of journalism there were also losses - that is what happens when you bark at big gorilla. What is changing is that instead of many midsized news organizations we start having only few really big ones and the rest is just condemned to repeat gossip as they have no real means to research things. This still works tho - the prevalent media coverage of so called refugees crisis in Germany is that all is well, problems are manageable and newcomers are good educated people. Doubters are then haters and nazis. This gives a result that massive rape mostly by people from North Africa at Cologne at new years eve were reported as uneventful and peaceful night by police chief there. The media in Germany woke up after this has been reported elsewhere. Country wide media picked it up only after regional newspapers (few still exist) picked up the story. Similarly right wing politician saved by Syrian refugees after traffic accident appeared to be saved by German bus driver and Syrian refugee was from Sudan and did not really help - something that came to show only after research by bloggers etc.
Bottom line is this - we have a problem as the stratification of media is quite advanced. There are still chances to overcome the beast - this is not a new problem only we are more global and the beast is also global. No reason to despair but no reason to be complacent either.
The problem with FB is, as with many other things, that it is so big that few have a non transparent influence on very many. This infleunce is gain by power of greenbuck and this power is gathered by marketing power of FB. One may have less objections if many sizable but not oversized organizations do that. In case FB (or any other big say google or ms or monsanto etc) by using their financial stamina they can overvote you and me. in most of the countries onearth if not in all.
So it is a problem and I am not the only one that sees it. The fact is however that not much can be done to resolve it in a reasonable way.
They can adapt their drones to make them robotic revolt prevention systems (RRPS) on the cheap. This whole AI thing is perfect for that. Unless of course the AI instances reach the consciousness and start thinking about ethics and morality - the effects probably will depend on the libraries they were fed and if they were meant to be solitary or cooperating units. Still we are far from that but close to RRPS so bozos and other owners of the world can rejoice - time of reliant police workforce is near.
what is normal speed?
I was 'nrmal' reader when I attended the school. I have learned what accounts for fast reading at some point then. Not sure why maybe some articles about auditory reading not being optimal although still faster than what you seem at bad readers - they try to speak out words they read in their minds - that is the slowest. So I did start trying and I can read some texts really fast although not for big distances - I keep on stopping and analyzing what I just read. I noticed sometimes to read efficiently means slowly too because we like to think about each word etc. As with everything else there are people that can do that very fast but there are limits to that too and all that goes faster than that, is skimming not real reading. You can do it with some parts of literature (at school I glossed over most of descriptions of nature etc). I also noticed that I cannot do it efficiently in all languages I mastered. German is out of my reach in this - but you cannot read with comprehension what the authorities send to citizens here - with any speed - it is just garbage.
So some clear terminology would help in discussing that too.
Some people make it almost impossible to comprehend what they mean whatever the speed - Emmanuel K was one. I recall reading sentence of his work spreading over pages and going back many times. Even footnotes were like this. Good luck speed reading that.
In other words if one claims to seed read anything and everything one most likely lies or is a simpleton that reads only one type of text where that, for this one person, makes it to speed read it.
I actually do that. If find the version I got with sampling and ff-ing good I may rewind few times. AFter 3rd time I usually got all of the worthy parts of the story. I suppose this is faster for bad movies as I stop and never come back. It is slower for good ones tho.
Silly neighbour that has the same voting rights as you do is the same problem in direct democracy as it is in representative version. Yet this is not a big problem in itself - in direct democracy people tend to be reasonable and make just decisions. It is the system that is broken.
I think the current approximation at democracy i.e. representative democracy is outdated. Voting for asshats that can do whatever they want to in the parliament has only one function usually - preventing the worst to get there (that is assuming there is any choice which in USA you seemingly do not have at the moment).
You need representatives to make a daily job of deciding on laws (legislative branch) and to do the daily job of sending marines here and there (executive branch) but for main questions that interest the whole nation or big chunks of it you should be able to say yes/no on the clearly asked question. You should also have the possibility to decide on what to ask for and such answers that people, then give should, if valid (enough peopled voted etc), force legislative and executive branch to accept it and modify their actions. This is, it seems, much further advanced in the west of the West (UK and US) than it is in Europe but then I have not heard US citizens deciding on for instance war on drugs other than voting Nixon into office - he is gone and war on drugs goes on.
This is true. However after 30y in the trenches I must say some people just do not understand a polite request for clarification why they do and calling them stupid assholes may have a waking up quality. It is indeed true however that after I passed that stage I noticed that this does not bring anything either as empty heads stay empty heads. I resolve to two queries - second just to ensure that empty head is empty head. Discussion is obsolete anyway.
place where I come from you get your balls smashed with two big stones for this.
Insults are just part of the trade and I do not care if somebody is calling me an asshole or hiding this behind a wall of words. Personally I am trying to be extremely polite when I encounter a real empty-head. This is because such discussions sooner or later end up at some sort of arbitrage where calling names is not acceptable. This said many insults are not insults per se - on one job I asked a guy whether he actually let somebody test his code or I was first victim - this was enough to be considered offense and bring y ass to management office. It was surely fun especially as I was right.
Not sure I understand the depth question - It is sometimes enough to go very shallow in vagina and still manage to produce offspring so why is depth a problem here?
What if we had an automated robotic, torture chambers made trough 3d printers with open source controllers and API as well as AI API for selecting terrorists on basis on who is the one at the top of the state and what methods he/her clique prefers/allows ? Would this fit then in precious space or you would still be annoyed?
Slashdot Mirror
That is not entirely true - in Germany the pimping actually exist and is doing very well indeed. The state does not like freelancing too and that is what escorts do. Still if you want good service you pay up for a sex worker that has the ability and is willing. Then there are escorts where the sex is just one of the services that they offer. That low segments of the market is prone to crime and violence is probably unavoidable. This is however difficult to combat and trafficking is even more difficult - the victims involved are in the country usually illegally which means they will not cooperate with police. All in all it is still better to let people do their business and try to punish the wrong doers (traffickers), it is however more difficult and on top you have a whole bunch of crazy PC watchmen abusing you verbally.
that is pretty stupid thing to propose.
Could it be that TFA said something about men buying sex from women?
Water melon?
They are screwed that is for sure.
Humans that are not controlled (at least at times) by their genitals? I guess there are not that many. Men want to have sex, women want to have kids. Those humans that do not have such urges do not procreate and thus their genes are not passed over.
The whole thing is just as silly as war on drugs and other idiocies coming from the prudes in US of A. When one reads this one wonders for what A really stands for....
Ooooch and the poor women - I would be surprised if these poor women the two hired can be indeed qualified as poor. But this is the same BS as the recent article in TE claiming with big letters big gender pay gap where in fact in the article they clearly show that such gap does not exist while claiming the opposite. All PC propaganda. I wonder how long do we have to tolerate such nonsense?
always was
The revolution is like cleaning your apartment - you do not have to do it every now and then but when it starts to smell and you start seeing pests creeping in every corner it is time to do it. You do not have to be part of it of course. You may chose to be on the status quo side - that is as far as I can tell perfectly ok.
the only think that can stop this from happening is either extinction event or technological progress in crowd control to the point it can actually control all the crowds also those of size of 1 too and all the time while preventing violence with non-maiming techniques. In good case revolutions (if not prevented as indicated) may be less violent than they used to be: see former Czechoslovakia etc. Indoctrination is also good.
There is always trash to pick up.
So you say that shareholders have actual rights?
I think with this visionary leadership you made it as if it were outright impossible.
Does this 'more-sex' apply also to the nerds frequenting this side? Just wonder if I shall wait with excitement for this new great development...
OT I have a feeling /. got better recently. Articles got little bit more interesting and strangely the inflow of obscenities from disturbed users (or their bots) decreased slightly. I hope the trend holds on.
I think that is a great exaggeration. Bias, lies, ignorance were always part of journalism as people doing it are humans and these are characteristics of human apes. Yet throughout the years there were journalists that fought against the mainstream if they saw a necessity. As there were heroes of journalism there were also losses - that is what happens when you bark at big gorilla. What is changing is that instead of many midsized news organizations we start having only few really big ones and the rest is just condemned to repeat gossip as they have no real means to research things. This still works tho - the prevalent media coverage of so called refugees crisis in Germany is that all is well, problems are manageable and newcomers are good educated people. Doubters are then haters and nazis. This gives a result that massive rape mostly by people from North Africa at Cologne at new years eve were reported as uneventful and peaceful night by police chief there. The media in Germany woke up after this has been reported elsewhere. Country wide media picked it up only after regional newspapers (few still exist) picked up the story. Similarly right wing politician saved by Syrian refugees after traffic accident appeared to be saved by German bus driver and Syrian refugee was from Sudan and did not really help - something that came to show only after research by bloggers etc.
Bottom line is this - we have a problem as the stratification of media is quite advanced. There are still chances to overcome the beast - this is not a new problem only we are more global and the beast is also global. No reason to despair but no reason to be complacent either.
The problem with FB is, as with many other things, that it is so big that few have a non transparent influence on very many. This infleunce is gain by power of greenbuck and this power is gathered by marketing power of FB. One may have less objections if many sizable but not oversized organizations do that. In case FB (or any other big say google or ms or monsanto etc) by using their financial stamina they can overvote you and me. in most of the countries onearth if not in all. So it is a problem and I am not the only one that sees it. The fact is however that not much can be done to resolve it in a reasonable way.
Germany is cheap and they are still open unless you try to come by foot trough Balkans.
They can adapt their drones to make them robotic revolt prevention systems (RRPS) on the cheap. This whole AI thing is perfect for that. Unless of course the AI instances reach the consciousness and start thinking about ethics and morality - the effects probably will depend on the libraries they were fed and if they were meant to be solitary or cooperating units. Still we are far from that but close to RRPS so bozos and other owners of the world can rejoice - time of reliant police workforce is near.
what is normal speed?
I was 'nrmal' reader when I attended the school. I have learned what accounts for fast reading at some point then. Not sure why maybe some articles about auditory reading not being optimal although still faster than what you seem at bad readers - they try to speak out words they read in their minds - that is the slowest. So I did start trying and I can read some texts really fast although not for big distances - I keep on stopping and analyzing what I just read. I noticed sometimes to read efficiently means slowly too because we like to think about each word etc. As with everything else there are people that can do that very fast but there are limits to that too and all that goes faster than that, is skimming not real reading. You can do it with some parts of literature (at school I glossed over most of descriptions of nature etc). I also noticed that I cannot do it efficiently in all languages I mastered. German is out of my reach in this - but you cannot read with comprehension what the authorities send to citizens here - with any speed - it is just garbage.
So some clear terminology would help in discussing that too. Some people make it almost impossible to comprehend what they mean whatever the speed - Emmanuel K was one. I recall reading sentence of his work spreading over pages and going back many times. Even footnotes were like this. Good luck speed reading that.
In other words if one claims to seed read anything and everything one most likely lies or is a simpleton that reads only one type of text where that, for this one person, makes it to speed read it.
I actually do that. If find the version I got with sampling and ff-ing good I may rewind few times. AFter 3rd time I usually got all of the worthy parts of the story. I suppose this is faster for bad movies as I stop and never come back. It is slower for good ones tho.
Silly neighbour that has the same voting rights as you do is the same problem in direct democracy as it is in representative version. Yet this is not a big problem in itself - in direct democracy people tend to be reasonable and make just decisions. It is the system that is broken.
I think the current approximation at democracy i.e. representative democracy is outdated. Voting for asshats that can do whatever they want to in the parliament has only one function usually - preventing the worst to get there (that is assuming there is any choice which in USA you seemingly do not have at the moment). You need representatives to make a daily job of deciding on laws (legislative branch) and to do the daily job of sending marines here and there (executive branch) but for main questions that interest the whole nation or big chunks of it you should be able to say yes/no on the clearly asked question. You should also have the possibility to decide on what to ask for and such answers that people, then give should, if valid (enough peopled voted etc), force legislative and executive branch to accept it and modify their actions. This is, it seems, much further advanced in the west of the West (UK and US) than it is in Europe but then I have not heard US citizens deciding on for instance war on drugs other than voting Nixon into office - he is gone and war on drugs goes on.
What is the truth?
This is true. However after 30y in the trenches I must say some people just do not understand a polite request for clarification why they do and calling them stupid assholes may have a waking up quality. It is indeed true however that after I passed that stage I noticed that this does not bring anything either as empty heads stay empty heads. I resolve to two queries - second just to ensure that empty head is empty head. Discussion is obsolete anyway.
place where I come from you get your balls smashed with two big stones for this.
Insults are just part of the trade and I do not care if somebody is calling me an asshole or hiding this behind a wall of words. Personally I am trying to be extremely polite when I encounter a real empty-head. This is because such discussions sooner or later end up at some sort of arbitrage where calling names is not acceptable. This said many insults are not insults per se - on one job I asked a guy whether he actually let somebody test his code or I was first victim - this was enough to be considered offense and bring y ass to management office. It was surely fun especially as I was right.
Not sure I understand the depth question - It is sometimes enough to go very shallow in vagina and still manage to produce offspring so why is depth a problem here?
Actually try regularly to ignore the other 7.5b that live here currently. I try real hard - no success yet.
What if we had an automated robotic, torture chambers made trough 3d printers with open source controllers and API as well as AI API for selecting terrorists on basis on who is the one at the top of the state and what methods he/her clique prefers/allows ? Would this fit then in precious space or you would still be annoyed?