Right, sure man, whatever. I know exactly what I said and meant, you have the right to understand it in a different manner, but you do not have the right to tell me what I said just because you understood it differently.
While I think its good that the guy was cought, I am against the idea of people working at a photo place reporting things to police (unless its kidie porn), maybe someone will make some law to that effect, but probably not, lawmakers like spying on people. So, a lesson to all you people with explosives (and I am all for explosives if your just blowing things up and not hurting people or other people's property btw) if your going to take pictures of them, ether do it digitaly, or have your own dark room.
When I said main main point, I wasn't referring to my original post. I was not saying that that was the point of the original post. I was just saying a main point is that the ad sucked. Perhaps I should have said something like "on to the main main point" instead of back to the main point. You must have miss interpreted the line "IN a later post I said the ad sucked, b ut never attempted to in my original posting". You say that is not true, then you say what I said in a different way. Like I said, I mentioned the ad sucked in a later point (later as in after the first point, not again after I said back to the main main point). I am not sure why you were confused on that point. And as to your last line, right back at you idiot, I know what I posted, and even looked back to verify, you misinterpreted what I was saying.
I never claimed that my original post made any comment about the quality of the bullshit ad. I did however say something like "back to the main point about the ad" or something, but I never actualy said my original post was about the ad. Get your facts right. In a later post I said the ad sucked, but never attempted to in my original posting. If you would pay attention you would know I never claimed to have commented on the ad in my first posting, instead my first post was making a small jab at a Canadian who messed up a sentence. Then you responded, then I blasted the ad in a later posting. Any by the way, that sentence was not fine, it was flawed and made little sense.
"So in short: whatever, buddy."
Since when did writing an incorrect (I should have said awkward at best) sentence that makes no sense become a mater of style? Oh sure there is experimental narratives and all that jazz, but when your writing in this kind of settings, a more traditional one than experimental narratives, writing a bad sentence is writing a bad sentence, and nothing more or less. So my point is 1) That was a really bad sentence, and 2) Your an idiot for not admitting it and trying to hide it my attempting to insult my intelligence.
While I am very aware of the fact that I cannot spell very well, I would consider that to not be as important in writing as grammer. I believe that many English and Writing profesors would agree. Your sentance was awkward and would be considered a bad sentance if you presented it in a college writing workshop, hell even in a high school class.
Right. And which book will teach me about nonsense sentances? I am sure they are out there, so please, give me a few names, and I'll see what I can do. Oh wait, I get enough nonsense in every day life, so I'm sorry, I don't have time to research your idiotic sentance to figure out what you were attempting to say.
Can you imagine the massive trafic james installing powerlines undergound will cause? Ripping up streets to put it in the ground and all. It would be hell in cities that don't have below ground power.
Well I wanted to work as a Geek Squad member, and I actualy know how to work on computers, I bet some of the people working there do to, they just have really bad policies. Also, as a customer, I don't want to be paying one company to fix my computer when it just goes and pays another company a little less to fix it and profits; I'd rather just find the second company in the first place.
I love it how people don't have a sense of humor, I should have never responded after my first posting. And back to the main main point, that open office ad mock up was hidious, someone shoot the person who came up with that shit.
I only hope they make the video quality decent. The shit iTunes provides can suck it, I can get that shit for free, in fact I have over 100 gigs of that kind of quality on my computer, all free, some riped from TV, so it is technicly just as legal as video taping it with a VCR, but then that argument lost, oh well thats another subject. Anyway, if I'm going to pay more than $3.50 (the price of rentals at my local store for a DVD) than it beter be DVD quality. And if I want a whole season of something, it beter be DVD quality too, not the shit iTunes has!!!
Of course I know that a portion of the Canadian population does not speak English as a first language. A way larger portion of the population of the United States does not speak english as a first language, but I don't notice them posting on an english website. Also, you need to learn to lighten the fuck up. Oh, also, maybe let the poster defend him/herself.
I wont be, and nethier will my parents, be buying ether of these formats anytime soon. I don't want to start buying blu-ray tech only to find out a few months down the line that blu-ray lost the war and HD-DVD won, or vice versa. If I had to pick one though I'd go with blu-ray because 1) the name sounds so much cooler, and 2) it has more storage capacity. Believe me, I want beter video quality than DVD offers, but not if its going to cost me so god damned much money. Also, in a few years, holo-disks are going to start coming out with a predicted 100-300 gigabyte storage capacity initialy, with a thearetical storage capacity of more than a tarabbyte. (Yes I know I can't spell, so live with it).
Perhaps I should have said business practices in general really piss me off. But then again, I easily get pissed off at stuff like that. Oh well, I hope something changes for the beter in the coming years, I mean this in life in general, otherwise this world is going to "hell".
Um, Can someone tell me what this is? I'm not a linux user (yet) mostly because I am an avid gamer and don't do much else with my computer but mess with hardware. I really wish games would start coming out with some kind of native linux support, this whole do-it-your-self-shit is getting old! Companies need to start supporting linux much more!
I think this can be legal because to get on facebook you have to use a college (or now high school) email address, and therefore the University might have some kind of legal rights over the email being used for facebook. Also, if you are using their computers or their internet access to set up face book. Ether way I hope someone fights this bullshit.
The situation that the customer care person desgribed calls in to question the meaning of customer care. I think its moraly wrong to call that, if that indeed is what happens often, customer care becuase thats lieing, your not taking care of the customer at all. And you say "but thats not 'morally wrong' -- it's reality"-you seem to think that reality is always moraly right. Murder is reality, but is it moral? I think not. I could go on and on with how reality isn't moral at all, but it also can be, and when possible should be. If I was the person who had this problem with their phone bill, I would cancle my account and refuse to pay the cancelation fees, or if you don't want to spend the time arguing with them, pay the fee and find a different company. Arg, big businesses piss me off so much sometimes, anyway, good luck with your phone bill man.
Basicly what this tells me is that "customer care" is not at all about the customer at all. While I thank the person for writing this, I think he should get a new job that isn't so moraly wrong.
The original Mickey is in the public domain, the reason why the copyright keeps getting extended is because they have changed the look of Mickey many times, so it is essentialy a new mouse with the same name. I'm not saying that its right or wrong, just saying that is why the new Mickey is still copyrighted, but you can go find an old image of Mickey and do whatever you want with it.
Slashdot Mirror
Right, sure man, whatever. I know exactly what I said and meant, you have the right to understand it in a different manner, but you do not have the right to tell me what I said just because you understood it differently.
Then go jump on the bandwagen man, download the software then sue.
While I think its good that the guy was cought, I am against the idea of people working at a photo place reporting things to police (unless its kidie porn), maybe someone will make some law to that effect, but probably not, lawmakers like spying on people. So, a lesson to all you people with explosives (and I am all for explosives if your just blowing things up and not hurting people or other people's property btw) if your going to take pictures of them, ether do it digitaly, or have your own dark room.
When I said main main point, I wasn't referring to my original post. I was not saying that that was the point of the original post. I was just saying a main point is that the ad sucked. Perhaps I should have said something like "on to the main main point" instead of back to the main point. You must have miss interpreted the line "IN a later post I said the ad sucked, b ut never attempted to in my original posting". You say that is not true, then you say what I said in a different way. Like I said, I mentioned the ad sucked in a later point (later as in after the first point, not again after I said back to the main main point). I am not sure why you were confused on that point. And as to your last line, right back at you idiot, I know what I posted, and even looked back to verify, you misinterpreted what I was saying.
I never claimed that my original post made any comment about the quality of the bullshit ad. I did however say something like "back to the main point about the ad" or something, but I never actualy said my original post was about the ad. Get your facts right. In a later post I said the ad sucked, but never attempted to in my original posting. If you would pay attention you would know I never claimed to have commented on the ad in my first posting, instead my first post was making a small jab at a Canadian who messed up a sentence. Then you responded, then I blasted the ad in a later posting. Any by the way, that sentence was not fine, it was flawed and made little sense. "So in short: whatever, buddy."
Yes, I realise that in my first point I made a typo and said my instead of by, and yes, my second point is hypocritical.
Since when did writing an incorrect (I should have said awkward at best) sentence that makes no sense become a mater of style? Oh sure there is experimental narratives and all that jazz, but when your writing in this kind of settings, a more traditional one than experimental narratives, writing a bad sentence is writing a bad sentence, and nothing more or less. So my point is 1) That was a really bad sentence, and 2) Your an idiot for not admitting it and trying to hide it my attempting to insult my intelligence.
While I am very aware of the fact that I cannot spell very well, I would consider that to not be as important in writing as grammer. I believe that many English and Writing profesors would agree. Your sentance was awkward and would be considered a bad sentance if you presented it in a college writing workshop, hell even in a high school class.
Right. And which book will teach me about nonsense sentances? I am sure they are out there, so please, give me a few names, and I'll see what I can do. Oh wait, I get enough nonsense in every day life, so I'm sorry, I don't have time to research your idiotic sentance to figure out what you were attempting to say.
I hope you know your entire first sentance makes no sense. And perhaps I was wrong, you have a sense of humor, just a very, very, very small one.
Woops, jams, not james.
Can you imagine the massive trafic james installing powerlines undergound will cause? Ripping up streets to put it in the ground and all. It would be hell in cities that don't have below ground power.
Well I wanted to work as a Geek Squad member, and I actualy know how to work on computers, I bet some of the people working there do to, they just have really bad policies. Also, as a customer, I don't want to be paying one company to fix my computer when it just goes and pays another company a little less to fix it and profits; I'd rather just find the second company in the first place.
I love it how people don't have a sense of humor, I should have never responded after my first posting. And back to the main main point, that open office ad mock up was hidious, someone shoot the person who came up with that shit.
I only hope they make the video quality decent. The shit iTunes provides can suck it, I can get that shit for free, in fact I have over 100 gigs of that kind of quality on my computer, all free, some riped from TV, so it is technicly just as legal as video taping it with a VCR, but then that argument lost, oh well thats another subject. Anyway, if I'm going to pay more than $3.50 (the price of rentals at my local store for a DVD) than it beter be DVD quality. And if I want a whole season of something, it beter be DVD quality too, not the shit iTunes has!!!
Of course I know that a portion of the Canadian population does not speak English as a first language. A way larger portion of the population of the United States does not speak english as a first language, but I don't notice them posting on an english website. Also, you need to learn to lighten the fuck up. Oh, also, maybe let the poster defend him/herself.
"they don't know what's a computer?"-WTF
I wont be, and nethier will my parents, be buying ether of these formats anytime soon. I don't want to start buying blu-ray tech only to find out a few months down the line that blu-ray lost the war and HD-DVD won, or vice versa. If I had to pick one though I'd go with blu-ray because 1) the name sounds so much cooler, and 2) it has more storage capacity. Believe me, I want beter video quality than DVD offers, but not if its going to cost me so god damned much money. Also, in a few years, holo-disks are going to start coming out with a predicted 100-300 gigabyte storage capacity initialy, with a thearetical storage capacity of more than a tarabbyte. (Yes I know I can't spell, so live with it).
Perhaps I should have said business practices in general really piss me off. But then again, I easily get pissed off at stuff like that. Oh well, I hope something changes for the beter in the coming years, I mean this in life in general, otherwise this world is going to "hell".
Um, Can someone tell me what this is? I'm not a linux user (yet) mostly because I am an avid gamer and don't do much else with my computer but mess with hardware. I really wish games would start coming out with some kind of native linux support, this whole do-it-your-self-shit is getting old! Companies need to start supporting linux much more!
I think this can be legal because to get on facebook you have to use a college (or now high school) email address, and therefore the University might have some kind of legal rights over the email being used for facebook. Also, if you are using their computers or their internet access to set up face book. Ether way I hope someone fights this bullshit.
The situation that the customer care person desgribed calls in to question the meaning of customer care. I think its moraly wrong to call that, if that indeed is what happens often, customer care becuase thats lieing, your not taking care of the customer at all. And you say "but thats not 'morally wrong' -- it's reality"-you seem to think that reality is always moraly right. Murder is reality, but is it moral? I think not. I could go on and on with how reality isn't moral at all, but it also can be, and when possible should be. If I was the person who had this problem with their phone bill, I would cancle my account and refuse to pay the cancelation fees, or if you don't want to spend the time arguing with them, pay the fee and find a different company. Arg, big businesses piss me off so much sometimes, anyway, good luck with your phone bill man.
Basicly what this tells me is that "customer care" is not at all about the customer at all. While I thank the person for writing this, I think he should get a new job that isn't so moraly wrong.
The original Mickey is in the public domain, the reason why the copyright keeps getting extended is because they have changed the look of Mickey many times, so it is essentialy a new mouse with the same name. I'm not saying that its right or wrong, just saying that is why the new Mickey is still copyrighted, but you can go find an old image of Mickey and do whatever you want with it.
Well then switch to Firefox, its much beter than Opera, I used to use Opera, then Firefox came out and I was like "WOW! A browser that actualy works!"