Slashdot Mirror


Has My Cell Number Been Cloned?

2bepissedoff asks: "According to my T-mobile phone bill, I have been receiving incoming calls from a 'NBR unavailable', since February, with talk time ranging from 1 minute to an hour. The strangest thing is, I have never received these calls (my phone doesn't ring and I haven't talked to the caller). I only started noticing them when my phone bill was charged over $40 more than my regular bill. Of course, I have a family plan (2 people only, 2 lines) and I talked to my partner. The answer: he too had not received any of these calls, especially over 300 minutes per month of them. We called up T-mobile twice and claim the possibility of phone cloning. Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something. Any advice to what this could be?" I did a little investigation and I've noticed that some of the NBR minutes overlap with calls I actually make. For example:

'2/22 at 3:28 pm "NBR unavailable" 17mins usage.
2/22 at 3:44 pm "-(# I made)---" 3mins usage.

So if you add up the time 3:28pm + 17 mins = 3:45 pm. The time when I made my call was at 3:44 pm. This reoccurs several times. I still do not think this is enough evidence to convince T-mobile of Phone Cloning. So I am thinking of switching either my number or my service provider. "

561 comments

  1. It's probably the NSA by Beached · · Score: 5, Funny

    Have you seen all the spy movies. They are listening to your calls ;)

    --
    ---- aut viam inveniam aut faciam
    1. Re:It's probably the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you seen all the spy movies.

      Uh dude, I think you mean the evening news.

      Assume they are listening to your calls. This administration has a record of serial lying; they admit what they're caught at red-handed and say, "well, okay, we do A, but we would never do B, and the implication that we would is insulting and gives comfort to the enemy."

      Then a few months later we find out that at the time of the denial, they were doing A, B, C, and D (torture, kidnapping and illegal rendition to torture countries, domestic spying on Americans, leaking identities of CIA agents, other petty acts of revenge on perceived enemies, etc.).

      Don't reference fiction, man, the reality is more disturbing.

    2. Re:It's probably the NSA by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      and you need special glasses to see Them. Remember, They Live.

    3. Re:It's probably the NSA by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1

      Parent should be modded "+5 Scary" instead of funny.

    4. Re:It's probably the NSA by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey... that's pretty efficient government! They listen in on your phone conversations, and you get billed for it!

    5. Re:It's probably the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh dude...I think the question was about cloning cell numbers, not a forum on your rather "interesting" political views.

    6. Re:It's probably the NSA by Mistlefoot · · Score: 5, Informative

      As an employee of a cell phone company who works in Customer Care I'll offer my two bits.

      1) When you call customer care ask for and write the down the Care agents name. If they hang up on (unless you are being incredibily agressive and swearing) that information will be handy to their Supervisor. Call back and let that be known.

      2) Both the IMEI number on the handset and Sim Care will be recorded. If both do not match on a disputed call this is strong evidence of cloning.

      3) You have 3 way calling, you have voice mail - two calls at one time is not an anomaly in itself.

      4) Ask for a Supervisor if you do not recieve care at a lower level.

      5) View your online account and watch you billing daily if you think this is a cloning problem. Trying to remember a call from 5 weeks ago is not easy.

      6) Don't dispute calls in general. Dispute specific calls. We can look up specific calls. Saying I have 47 billed minutes I didn't use means nothing. Saying, the call to 123-456-7890 on 6/03/06 at 2:57pm was not made by me. We can actually help with that.

      7) Correspond via email instead of calling. Over the phone pressure exists to keep the lenght of the call down. Via email agents can research your issue without having to leave you on hold - the pressure for resolution in a 5 minute phone call is not there.

      8) When you hear this often in a Call center you do become immune to it. People lie all the time - a popular one is "I have bad coverage" only to find out after reviewing their account that they've used 2800 minutes this month and are happy to accept a discounted handset with a 2 year deal. People with truly bad coverage do not renew for two years and have 2800 minutes usage per month. As such, it is easy for a Care agent to dismiss you without much investigation. Do not give up after 1 or 2 calls (or email). This does not mean that you are right, merely that your issue will be investigated more thoroughly the second or third time. This is normal in many businesses.

    7. Re:It's probably the NSA by chengmi · · Score: 1
      People lie all the time - a popular one is "I have bad coverage" only to find out after reviewing their account that they've used 2800 minutes this month and are happy to accept a discounted handset with a 2 year deal. People with truly bad coverage do not renew for two years and have 2800 minutes usage per month.


      This isn't necessarily true.

      I use the same cell network as my girlfriend to take advantage of unlimited in-network calling. We normally spend 2800+ minutes per month on the phone, but I have absolutely horrible reception. She's in the SF Bay Area with near perfect reception, but I'm on the edge of Sacramento, with very poor service.

      I would gladly accept a discounted handset (maybe the reception would be better?) with a 2 year contract. So would my account automatically get flagged with "Liar"?
    8. Re:It's probably the NSA by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      Basicly what this tells me is that "customer care" is not at all about the customer at all. While I thank the person for writing this, I think he should get a new job that isn't so moraly wrong.

    9. Re:It's probably the NSA by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Basicly what this tells me is that "customer care" is not at all about the customer at all.
      Well, you could argue about who it's really for all you want, but ultimately if you can spend a little money and keep your customers happy, and therefore make sure they remain your customer, that's usually a good business decision. That's what customer care is generally all about -- keep the customer happy, and they'll stay your customer, and tell their friends, spend more money with you, etc.

      Now, spending a whole lot of money to make a single customer happy, far more money than you can make from him and anybody he's likely to tell about his happyness or his unhappyness, that's probably not a good decision. The trick is to find the line between the two.

      While I thank the person for writing this, I think he should get a new job that isn't so moraly wrong.
      There's nothing morally wrong about any of this.

      Granted, the person described a place where `the customer isn't always right', but that's not `morally wrong' -- it's reality. Customers *do* lie to support people, and any situation where you assume that everybody is telling the truth, even when you strongly suspect that they're not, is a situation where you're likely to be taken advantage of.

      (And really, if you do find a place that says `the customer is always right', odds are that they don't really mean it. They may try to give the customer the benefit of the doubt whenever possible, but always right? No. Doubt me? Go in and tell them they owe you $100,000. See how far that gets you.

    10. Re:It's probably the NSA by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      The situation that the customer care person desgribed calls in to question the meaning of customer care. I think its moraly wrong to call that, if that indeed is what happens often, customer care becuase thats lieing, your not taking care of the customer at all. And you say "but thats not 'morally wrong' -- it's reality"-you seem to think that reality is always moraly right. Murder is reality, but is it moral? I think not. I could go on and on with how reality isn't moral at all, but it also can be, and when possible should be. If I was the person who had this problem with their phone bill, I would cancle my account and refuse to pay the cancelation fees, or if you don't want to spend the time arguing with them, pay the fee and find a different company. Arg, big businesses piss me off so much sometimes, anyway, good luck with your phone bill man.

    11. Re:It's probably the NSA by dougmc · · Score: 1
      I think its moraly wrong to call that, if that indeed is what happens often, customer care becuase thats lieing, your not taking care of the customer at all.
      It's all a matter of perspective. For most customers, `customer care' probably helps the customer. I imagine that most people who call whatever cell phone company's support line get the assistance they need. The last time I called my cell phone provider (and the only time, actually -- it's a work phone, so I didn't set it up) was to have them reset my voice mail password. They did so quickly and I was happy with the service I was provided. It cost them very little to make me happy (as I was easily pleased at the time), and they did.
      Arg, big businesses piss me off so much sometimes, anyway
      Small business isn't really fundamentally any better. And any business, big or small, who always gives the customer what they want, no matter what, will eventually either 1) change their policy, or 2) go out of business as customers learn this and start taking advantage of it.
    12. Re:It's probably the NSA by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have said business practices in general really piss me off. But then again, I easily get pissed off at stuff like that. Oh well, I hope something changes for the beter in the coming years, I mean this in life in general, otherwise this world is going to "hell".

  2. switching the number won't work by Incongruity · · Score: 4, Informative
    without changing your SIM card, changing the # won't make a difference, I believe.

    Get a new account -- new SIM's for both you and your partner and do it sooner rather than later, for your sake =)

    1. Re:switching the number won't work by Bob535 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree, working for a Cellular Company, the easiest way to fix this would be to call in and ask for them to replace your SIM card. No need for a new account, just ask them to send you out new SIMs. If this doesnt fix the problem, ask for a ticket to be filed and an engineer to call you back with the explaination. The agents dont know anything anyways.

    2. Re:switching the number won't work by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Informative

      If its a GSM phone, I very much doubt any cloning has occured for the following reasons.

      BTW, I used to work for Logica, in the telecoms division, and have a LOT of knowledge of GSM systems, and how they work. I am also a T-Mobile (UK) customer.

      Remember these facts:

      - A GSM phone has a unique IMEI number.
      - Each GSM phone has a unique SIM card with a unique SIM number. This SIM number is attacted on a central computer to your account.
      - Although the SIM card does contain your number, it is many for informative, and not operational purposes.

      When you switch on your phone and it logs onto your network, it sends its IMEI number, and its SIM number to the network. The network then looks up the SIM number and associates it with a number. As it stands, only one SIM number can ever be associated with a phone number. When i tried getting a new SIM to replace my aging SIM, the old one was disconnected before the new SIM was issued, as it is simply not possible to associate a number with two SIMs. You can associate a SIM with two or more numbers, but not the other way round.

      If someone HAS cloned your SIM, and both phones are attached at the same time, the network would register a fault, as a SINGLE sim number is assiciated at two different locations. It woudl create a fault in the system which would prevent both yours and the clone SIM from working. This is actually one of the main reasons why Cellphones are not usable on Planes (even if it is prooven to be safe to the electronics). The phone woudl try to log onto multiple cells at the same time, causing a lot of strain on the network, or even malfunction.

      A SIM can only be "effectively" cloned if the original was never used afterwards. If both the Original SIM and the Clone was used at the same time, the network will try and continuesly switch between the two cells its registered to, unless both are on the same cell. if both are on the same cell, further issues would happen.

      I am not sayign that cloning is impossible, its just extremely unlikely.

      I woudl think the most likely causes of this situation are:
      - Are you *sure* your partner is not recieving the calls? Really sure?
      - Maybe, if you visited another country (or performed roaming) there might be some residual temporary numbers assigned to your phone.

      However, the way the records are kept, you shoudl find that its pretty easy for the phone company to determine what happend. Who made the phone call, what handset was in use, where the call was recieved.

      Finally I do not know the laws of the US, but here in the UK, the first point of call if you think your phone has been cloned or if your believe that a crime has been committed regarding your phone is the POLICE.

      In UK, if we recieve am abusive call, calling the phone company will not be any help. They will rightly ask you to contact the police first, and they will work with the police to resolve the matter.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    3. Re:switching the number won't work by julesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In UK, if we recieve am abusive call, calling the phone company will not be any help. They will rightly ask you to contact the police first, and they will work with the police to resolve the matter.

      Actually, BT has a department that customers can call if they're receiving abusive calls that offers advice about how to deal with them, and actively encourages people to call them before the police. I suspect other phone companies handle it in a similar manner.

    4. Re:switching the number won't work by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      What about bluetooth?

    5. Re:switching the number won't work by LOADLETTER · · Score: 0

      You don't need a new account, - simply throw away the SIM card and get another one from T-Mobile. If you have a (never used) SIM card laying around, just call T-Mobile and give them the number printed on the SIM.

    6. Re:switching the number won't work by ysr · · Score: 1
      As it stands, only one SIM number can ever be associated with a phone number.

      That is actually not correct, I have 2 different SIMs that are connected simultaneously to the same phone number.
    7. Re:switching the number won't work by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, contacting the company they may be able to resolve the immeadiate problem of the bills, and issue a replacement SIM. The can only deal with abuse of the system, but not with a crime. Only the authorities can do that.

      Here is a good example of a call I did very recently with T-Mobile, and BT. I started recieving abusive calls on both my Mobile, and my landline, with an anonymous number. I reported to both companies, who noted down the call, and ensured that evidence will be kept. then they asked me to contact the police with my details to take it further. They were unable to tell me who was doing it, without police intervention. hey both offered to change my number if I wished.

      I contacted the police, and as part of the investigation, the POlice authorised a line monitor on both my lane line and my mobile, as well as records on the lines. I was then contacted by BT and T-Mobile seperately explaining how the line monitor works.

      in some cases, BT may be able to respond to certain abuses quicker directly, as they own the entire network, including the lines going into your house. But with regard to a crime (which is what cloning/makign abusive calls are) they refer you to the police as well.

      PS. I dont understand what part of my original post is "flamebait", as someone has modded it.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    8. Re:switching the number won't work by RazorKitten · · Score: 1


      Sim Number = ICCID?

      The Mobile is verified with the IMSI and the KI, the ICCID has nothing to do with it. The IMEI is what identifies your subscription to the network, not the MSISDN nor the ICCID.

      It is however unlikly, yet quite possible that if two sims have the same IMSI+KI (hence a cloned card.

      Usually you can have two cloned cards/mobiles on the network at the same time, and the results can be rather unpredictable. Both tend to be able to make calls out, however incoming calls tend to be routed to the 'most recently on' however not necessarily always the case. It should be pretty easy for the support people to see which part of the network you have ever been connected from, and if they see similar time slots from geographicly distinct locations, they should be able to figure out what happened. They may just not want to admit it.

      The simplist solution is to go to a T-Mobile store and ask to purchase a new sim card, with that call up their customer care and ask to perform a sim swap of your current number. That will fix any issues 'IF' the card was cloned.

        -RK

    9. Re:switching the number won't work by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note i said SIM NUMBER.. not SIM ;)

      it is possible, and indeed within the spec to have two SIMs attached to a phone number. When a call is recieved, both phone are alerted, and whoever "picks up" answers.

      Each SIM NUMBER has to be unique. if two physical phones with the same SIM number connects, the system will not be abel to tell them apart, and will fault.

      If a SIM is cloned in such a way that two different SIMs with different numbers have the same phone number, that "clone" would have to be created by the phone company (which would need to adjust their database), and therefore is an inside job, not by Mr Joe down the street.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    10. Re:switching the number won't work by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      It woudl create a fault in the system which would prevent both yours and the clone SIM from working. This is actually one of the main reasons why Cellphones are not usable on Planes (even if it is prooven to be safe to the electronics). The phone woudl try to log onto multiple cells at the same time, causing a lot of strain on the network, or even malfunction.

      Thanks for this note.

      The traditional "navigation systems interference" has never passed the "smell test" for me.
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    11. Re:switching the number won't work by 3247 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As it stands, only one SIM number can ever be associated with a phone number.
      Actually, O2 Germany offers this as a service. (Yes, you actually get two accounts - one per SIM - which just share the phone number.)

      It woudl create a fault in the system which would prevent both yours and the clone SIM from working. This is actually one of the main reasons why Cellphones are not usable on Planes (even if it is prooven to be safe to the electronics).
      No, GSM can handle this quite well. In towns with a high base station density, it is also possible that multiple cells are visible.
      --
      Claus
    12. Re:switching the number won't work by __aainau5532 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to say, but in the Netherlands (and I know of more countries) you can buy multiple SIM-cards from your telco that have been cloned (as in identical!!!) and they both work without any real issues. There is only one drawback, only one can receive calls and that is if I'm not mistaken the first one that was actived when you have them both active. This feature was "designed" so people could have a SIM-card for the car phone and there for the mobile phone.

    13. Re:switching the number won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read this knowing that I have not looked at your original post.

      The moderator probably read your post, clicked 'insightful' or 'interesting' or whatever. Then, when they scrolled their mouse down the page, instead of the page scrolling, the drop down edit control scrolled. It stopped on 'flamebait.' The moderator didn't notice. Other events happened, they clicked the moderate button, and viola! You're post is labeled for life.

    14. Re:switching the number won't work by treeves · · Score: 1

      Good info, but "If its a GSM phone,. . ." is a BIG "if". If 2bepissedoff is in the US, chances are that it's not a GSM phone, but TDMA or CDMA.

      Oh, never mind, T-Mobile uses GSM only, so it definitely is a GSM phone.
      I am so behind the times.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    15. Re:switching the number won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/report_sets/ped.pdf

      While none of these are scientific and none can be proven that it was actually the cause of the cell phone, above are some interesting scenarios. If aircraft captains complain of interference from cell phones it seems like it should at least pass your "smell test". I still think it has to be a pretty unique situation and combination of events to have an effect, but you have to admit it is at least a reasonable idea.

    16. Re:switching the number won't work by muftak · · Score: 1

      You can extract the KI out of some SIMs by brute force.
      I have 2 SIMs with the same KI and IMSI (and 2 phones with the same IMEI).
      The last one to register on the network receives all incoming calls, you cannot make 2 calls simultanously, when a call is made on one it drops the call on the other.
      This is what is does when both are in the same cell anyway.... i've not tried it with 2 phones on different cells or in different countries yet :)

      Try reading http://www.isaac.cs.berkeley.edu/isaac/gsm-faq.htm l

    17. Re:switching the number won't work by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      I would check the ring volume. If the mode=="silent" then that is probably your problem. The hour calls are probably accidently knocking in your purse. Hope that helps. Next week on Ask Slashdot, I think my boyfriend is cheating on me what should I do?

    18. Re:switching the number won't work by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1
      the easiest way to fix this would be to call in and ask for them to replace your SIM card

      But at $25/SIM card, that's $50 for something that TMobile should really handle themselves. ($25/sim replacement is accurate as of a week ago, when I had one replaced.)

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    19. Re:switching the number won't work by Incongruity · · Score: 1

      The reason I suggested a new account is pretty straightforward: If the issue isn't cloning (which, frankly I'd be skeptical of as an answer), then it's a problem with the account. I've had some trouble with TMobile (USA) myself and I've found that getting things fixed if you've been labeled a problem (which being hung up on twice is likely a sign that the poster is moving in that direction) is difficult in some cases (note, I've also had some really good experiences with TMobile, go figure).

      SO the easiest thing to do if they're not listening to you is get another account -- with them or another carrier, it doesn't matter -- the new account will be free of whatever internal confusion there seems to be connected to the original account.

      My suggestion was really an attempt at a catch-all solution.

    20. Re:switching the number won't work by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      actually he said the calls were RECEIVED (incoming). if i called someone, and can tell that a person "accidently" answered the phone (whilst it was in their pocket) I would hang up, and try ringing again. I woudl not hold the call for an hour!

      To be honest, it looks like his partner probably had another "partner".. who called that line "number witheld", and was just fobbing him off, sayign that his phone may be cloned. That seems the most likely situation.

      (the fact the calls were INCOMMING, and the number was unavailable are the biggest clues)

      --
      Have a nice day!
    21. Re:switching the number won't work by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Remember these facts:

      - A GSM phone has a unique IMEI number and the right phone can have it's IMEI changed to match yours
      - Each GSM phone has a unique SIM card with a unique SIM number. This SIM number is attacted on a central computer to your account and the right sim can be cloned to match your sim.
      - Although the SIM card does contain your number, it is many for informative, and not operational purposes. -- blatently false. Your phone does not work without the sim therefore it IS for operation purposes.

      GSM CAN be cloned, I have seen it done. the phone's IMEI can be changed if you have the right gear and model of cellphone and yes you can clone a SIM serial number with the right sim (Sim=smartcard with a small formfactor not hard to get a 16f84 based one to emulate anything you want.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:switching the number won't work by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The traditional "navigation systems interference" has never passed the "smell test" for me.

      Neither do many of the passengers. But seriously, the weather, a phone would have to be pretty close to an unshielded piece of equipment to cause any trouble. But they do radiate. And with "fly by wire", a chafed cable can let the RF in. When my phone is close to the speakers on my machine, it creates a hell of a noise in the speaker when it rings. On another note, imagine, if you will, two hundred people screaming into their phones in that closed space you're trapped in. Add a few crying babies, some belligerent drunks. All I can say is, Gut fahrt.

      --
      What?
    23. Re:switching the number won't work by Jab25 · · Score: 1

      My questions is why the heck is this an article on slashdot? I thought this was "news for geeks", not some messageboard to vent frustrations. One guy getting his phone cloned isn't exactly "tech news". Who screens this crap?

    24. Re:switching the number won't work by dkuntz · · Score: 1

      Well, I do believe that the SIM card does contain your number for operational purposes. This is why, with GSM providers, you can pick up a new phone, not from the company, pop your card, in, and it will work. Thats why, at least here, they are selling laptops with Cingular GSM modems built in. As long as you have a valid account with cingular, and a data plan, pop SIM out of phone, into laptop, and you're connected. The IMEI really only counts, from what I've seen, in identifying which phone has made the call, or in the case of the PalmOne Treo, installing software locked to 1 phone.

      It is possible to clone SIM cards, as well. I've seen the software, and even looked into getting it (for legit purposes, as I've seen dual sided SIMs, so I can have both T-Mobile and Cingular on one phone, just flip the card as needed).

      --
      OMG... I have a sig?
    25. Re:switching the number won't work by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      BTW, I used to work for Logica, in the telecoms division, and have a LOT of knowledge of GSM systems, and how they work.

      That's not really a good advertisement for Logica then.

      The IMEI has next to nothing to do with any sort of security function of GSM. It only identifies your handset, and some countries have a registry that they'll put your stolen phone's IMEI on so networks can prevent the handset's further use in that particular country among the operators that signed up to the registry, but IMEI is not checked against your subscription. In fact, that's one of the primary design tenets of GSM; subscription data is contained in the Subscriber Identity Module; the SIM.

      is simply not possible to associate a number with two SIMs. You can associate a SIM with two or more numbers, but not the other way round.
      This is false. Many operators offer dual SIM cards; both cards contain the same subscription data, and usually the last one activated is logged on to the network succesfully to receive incoming calls. Both can make outbound calls.

      If someone HAS cloned your SIM, and both phones are attached at the same time, the network would register a fault
      No, it works, though you will notice only one handset receiving calls. It's not registered as a fault (though it is registered).

      A SIM can only be "effectively" cloned if the original was never used afterwards. If both the Original SIM and the Clone was used at the same time, the network will try and continuesly switch between the two cells its registered to, unless both are on the same cell. if both are on the same cell, further issues would happen.
      Again, not true.

      In fact, if certain algorithms are used (IIRC, COMP-128) it's even possible to reconstruct the SIM's KI and clone it using information eavesdropped over-the-air (be afraid!).

      - Maybe, if you visited another country (or performed roaming) there might be some residual temporary numbers assigned to your phone.
      Which numbers would those be? The connection between your MSISDN and most-likely (or actual) away-network is always looked up via the home registry; the away-registry doesn't associate any temporary MSISDNs to your SIM, it doesn't need to. And if it did, and someone misdialed such a random number, how would they be supposed to get through to you? Their home registry simply won't accept entries for SIMs from your network.

      However, the way the records are kept, you shoudl find that its pretty easy for the phone company to determine what happend. Who made the phone call, what handset was in use, where the call was recieved.
      Spoken as some one who's never tried to get a phone company to look up something in their records. Good luck trying that. Yes, it's technically feasible, but that doesn't mean phone companies are organizationally capable of doing this.

      Finally I do not know the laws of the US, but here in the UK, the first point of call if you think your phone has been cloned or if your believe that a crime has been committed regarding your phone is the POLICE.
      No, first call the phone company to report fraud, so they can put restrictions in place (e.g. no international calls, no premium toll numbers) to prevent ongoing abuse and rising phone bills, and report and investigate at leisure.

      In UK, if we recieve am abusive call, calling the phone company will not be any help. They will rightly ask you to contact the police first, and they will work with the police to resolve the matter.
      Again, no; "British Telecom has its own unit, which deals with nuisance calls. If you have not already reported it to BT then contact them on 150. They will investigate first and if they can trace the calls, you will then be advised to make a formal police report to your local police station. Cable & Wireless and mobile phone companies require that it be reported to police before they will deal with it. Attend your

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    26. Re:switching the number won't work by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      If someone HAS cloned your SIM, and both phones are attached at the same time, the network would register a fault, as a SINGLE sim number is assiciated at two different locations. It woudl create a fault in the system which would prevent both yours and the clone SIM from working. This is actually one of the main reasons why Cellphones are not usable on Planes (even if it is prooven to be safe to the electronics). The phone woudl try to log onto multiple cells at the same time, causing a lot of strain on the network, or even malfunction.

      This is contrary to my understanding.

      When you switch on a cell phone, it listens on several (pre-determined) broadcast channels to see which one has the strongest signal (without roaming unnecessarily). It then registers onto that cell, which causes the cell site to notify its location registers that you are there, which then allows the network to route incoming calls to the right cell site. Thus, it is very common for the phone to see multiple cells, and it would certainly not try to register with all of them.

      One problem with cell phones on aircraft, however, is that it messes with frequency re-use. The cell phone company is issued some frequencies, and instead of requiring a really large band for their entire coverage area, they re-use portions of the band whenever the transmissions don't overlap. That is, if you're on the ground you should never see two different cell sites advertising themselves on the same broadcast channel. However, if you're on a plane, you might actually see that interference. Even if you register successfully with one of the cell sites, when you try to make a call, the cell will issue your phone a particular frequency that another cell might've also issued. IOW, for cell phones to work reliably on aircraft, frequency re-use must be greatly reduced.

      Maybe, if you visited another country (or performed roaming) there might be some residual temporary numbers assigned to your phone.

      Huh? The whole point is to have a single phone number where people could call you even when you are roaming.

    27. Re:switching the number won't work by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Why not? I've read through enough reports in NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System database to convince me that the problem is real, although uncommon and hard to reproduce.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    28. Re:switching the number won't work by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      The issue of abusive phone calls is completely different from someone hacking a cell provider's network.

      If someone is making abusive phone calls to you, then YOU are the victim. And it would be up to you to take it to the police. If someone is hacking the cell network, then the victim is the phone company. They can and should take it up with the police if they choose to. For all you know it is a computer error in their billing system. As a customer your only concern is that the phone company is erroneously billing you for calls you didn't make. You have no information as to WHY this is. You didn't witness anything. They are perfectly within their rights to involve the police if they choose to. If the police feel like you know something or may be able to assist so be it. But don't let the telecom company convince you that someone hacking into their network is your responsibility to resolve. It isn't.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    29. Re:switching the number won't work by TuomasK · · Score: 1
      When i tried getting a new SIM to replace my aging SIM, the old one was disconnected before the new SIM was issued, as it is simply not possible to associate a number with two SIMs. You can associate a SIM with two or more numbers, but not the other way round.
      Probably true in America, but here in Finland we can have multiple gsm sim cards for the same phonenumber (You can have one phonenumber on two different phones, both working at the same time). So it is possible, your operators just don't support it.
      --
      The truth or interpretation..
    30. Re:switching the number won't work by DM9290 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I also work at a telecom company (I will not identify which), and am involved with the development of logic for real time processing of phone calls. You put far too much faith in telecom systems checking for what may or may not be a nonsensical situations. It is far easier to simply process and complete a phone call, than to speculate on an infinite number of potentially contradictory situations which may arrise which might suggest foul-play.

      There is nothing implicitly wrong with completing 2 phone calls at the same time. And while there may be cases where it makes no sense, there are so many cases where it makes sense that generaly speaking it is easier to allow it than to presume there is a problem. A call appearing on a bill for a persons cell phone may not even involve a CELL call or a cloned SIM card at all. It could be a land line which the telco wrongly associated with the cell customers phone bill. There may be nothing wrong with the CELL network at all, but a mere data entry error in the billing system.

      We are first and foremost concerned with insuring that our customers (or any party which even appears to be a customer) are able to completing their phone calls. Failing to complete a good call is considered a much more serious error than erroneously ALLOWING the completion of a fraudulent call. The rule of thumb is.. when in doubt : complete the call. In fact, I would say that while our systems are 99.999% reliable, their ability to stop fraudulent phone calls is NOT 99.999%. Or at least I can say our testing and so forth in that regard has not been enough to make such a claim.

      So... does my code care if you complete 65 phone calls at the same time? no. For all I know you have a service which allows you to complete 65 phone calls at the same time. And if such a service doesn't exist right today, for all I know someone will dream it up next week. It is not for me to speculate.

      As a hypothetical:
      If the same phone line initiated a call from 2 seperate switches simultaneously, there would be no information passed between the 2 switches to detect such an impossible situation. The difficulty of trying to insure such a check was functioning in real time exceeds the benefit.

      In fact... even if we could detect such situations in real time, I would be loath to presume that it was in fact wrong. What if those 2 switches are load sharing? What if Switch A, initiated Call #1, and then experienced a problem causing calls to be routed to Switch B? I would need to think of every possible situation to insure I didn't accidentally break functionality that ought to work.

      We design telephone systems to work when there are serious failures all over the network. We don't want to be the one responsible to not completing that phone call that results in someone dying or whatever.

      You can pretty much assume telephone networks (to the extent that they would BLOCK a phone call which looks funny) are not bullet proof.

      If some technician tells you they are, that technician doesn't know what he's talking about.

      I would be amazed that a customer support person actually hung up on a customer who wanted to know about the possibility of cloning a SIM card.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    31. Re:switching the number won't work by cjunkie · · Score: 1

      ok let me make a few corrections....

      You cannot clone a GSM sim - Not Correct
      A GSM phone has a unique IMEI number - correct
      Each GSM phone has a unique sim card with a unique sim number, This sim number is attached on a central computer to your account - Mostly correct
      Although the sim card does not contain your number is is mainly for informative, and not for operational purposes. - Not correct
      The IMEI number is used to identify the user - Not correct
      you cannot use a phone in an airplane as it will sign onto every cell site it sees breaking the network - Not correct.

      First of all the sim number printed on the sim is just the serial number of the peice of plastic. its an inventory number. Sort of useful but in reality not very.

      The Sim is actualy an extremely sophisticated computer in its own right. it has ROM, RAM and EEPROM. It has its own operating system, and holds some applications, the security algorithms A3 and A8, The Keys to the kingdom - KI, and the subscriber identity IMSI.

      The subscriber is identified by IMSI, MSISDN, TMSI and MSRN
      Only the handset is identified by IMEI

      Two ways to clone a GSM sim:
      1) break it over the air:
      Adi Shamir, Alex Biryukov and David Wagner wrote a paper on Cryptanalysis of A5/1 which shows you one way.

      http://cryptome.org/a51-bsw.htm

      unfortunately it is flawed. Ill give you a prize if you know how. .....However if you know how it is flawed, you can easily work out how to make the attack viable...

      2)Brute force the SIM. If your sim is protected by comp128 and it hasnt been programmed to suicide after a finite number of brute force attempts then using a "phoenix" type smart card reader and some readily available software you can brute force the sim after a couple of hours. Once succesfull you can take a copy of the IMSI and KI to store as you see fit.

      One amusing educational exercise when you do have a copy of your KI and IMSI is to write a copy of the application "sim menu" to a programmable card and add your sims identity to it. Then repeat this exercise with a few additional sims until you have a home made "multisim". When you start the phone you will get a menu asking you which simcard identity you wish to use. Which ever one you activate is the one that receives and sends calls.

      No its not possible to have more than one sim identity active at the same time.

      This is not possible with the sims for pretty muchg all the major operators in the western hemisphere. For the simple reason that the sim has been programmed to suicide after a certain number of attempts to access it. You need more than this number of guesses (or lots of luck) to crack the sim.

      So anyway, the chances of you being cloned are slim. its possible but not likely.

      Its far more likely the network operator made a mistake, or that you ahve roaming charges that are only just being applied to your account. When roaming, operators tend to get inconsistent data and sometimes this can take a month or more to appear on your bill.

      Of course theres the other possibility that your partner made the calls.

      Last but not least thye myth that using a GSM phone on an aiplane will crash a network becuase it tries to sign onto too many cells. This is exactly that. A myth.

      A GSM handset will lock onto the single strongest signal. If a stronger one comes along then it will hop onto that one.

      anyway its likely we will have mobile coverage on planes by the end of this year or early next.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/16/planes_cel lphones_boeing/

      just like in the case of hospitals, the main reason for banning cell phones was paranoia (though they did interfere with some types of fire system).

      cj

    32. Re:switching the number won't work by Kodack · · Score: 1

      First off the Logica RIG sucks.

      Secondly the mobile sends an IMSI when it attatches to the network, the IMEI is like your phones serial number which the carrier doesn't really care about. The IMSI is what attatches to your HLR profile.

      And phones do work in airplanes and any cellphone anywhere, on the ground, or in the air, can talk to multiple BTS stations at the same time. This is how they track the location of 911 calls, by comparing the signal delay between multiple BTS's that are in contact with your phone and triangulating the location with an MLC. The BSC is the brains behind the radio operation and it constantly monitors the signal strength of your phone and picks the closest radio for you to attatch to. As you start getting closer to another cell, like on an airplane, the system sees a drop in the signal to noise ration and begins to initiate a hand over to the new radio. The BSC handles all of this seemlesly in the background and instructs your phone which radio to talk to.

      The reason they don't want you using cell phones in an airplane is becasue of possible interference to the cockpit instrumentation. Planes navigate by radio, using an azimuth to plot a course using radio beacons. Any radio interference can cause an error and potentially put the plane off course.

      You are right though that it's nearly impossible to clone a GSM phone because the system will not allow you to be attatched in two places at once. I don't believe it will kick both phones off the network though. It would treat it like a forced handover at the worst, and at the least it wouldn't allow the cloned mobile to attatch if the other phone was already on the network.

      And lastly, if you think your phone might be cloned but your not sure....DONT GO TO THE POLICE. Do you think they are going to launch an investigation because you have calls on your phone bill that look suspicious? That in itself isn't evidence of a crime. You need to call the 611 Tmobile UK call center and get someone from customer service to help and escelate up to Tier2 if you have to. If people filed police reports every time they disagreed with a phone bill.......

    33. Re:switching the number won't work by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Note i said SIM NUMBER.. not SIM ;)

      Don't you mean IMSI?

    34. Re:switching the number won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Telepath :)

    35. Re:switching the number won't work by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Having 4.5 years of sea time on two Ticonderoga-class cruisers and one Oliver Hazard Perry-class cruiser, plus flailed my way to an engineering degree, I've seen enough RF equipment interactions to know that

      a) The FCC could probably prove the point reasonably conclusively one way or another, were there will, and

      b) If the navigation system is really that fragile, they'd harden it more. After all, they manage to funnel you to their seatback handsets without junk falling out of the sky, no?

      No, the cheap way to solve the problem is to train the people to be docile and obedient to the aircrew. I'm not even kinda arguing the point. Makes perfect sense from a security vantage. I'm saying that I find this interference claim is one of those "wardrobe malfunctions" that paper over a small mountain of other motives.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    36. Re:switching the number won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Having worked as a CSR for a major cell phone company I can say that your advise is on the money.

      Despite what people think, very little information is actually available to your average CSR. When a rep says he can't access information he most likely can't.

      For example. There is no way for me to know ANYTHING about an anonymous phone call except the tower used, (and therefore the location) and the duration.

      These companies only give its CSRs enough information to do basic tasks, nothing more. While the records ARE there. The only people that have access are law enforcement agencies. (Who have specific channels to gain access to them)

    37. Re:switching the number won't work by MallardDuck · · Score: 1

      Not sure if GSM is different, but at least one mobile phone provider here (in the US) had a plan where you could get two phones that worked on the same phone number. It was a cheaper way to have multiple phones if you didn't mind having both phones ring when you got a call.

      Since I didn't look into it further, I'm not sure how they handled talking from one to the other (did you just call your own number?) or even if person 2 could take a call that person 1 answered first.

      Still, you could have multiple phones on the same phone number.

    38. Re:switching the number won't work by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      This is actually one of the main reasons why Cellphones are not usable on Planes

      But what about hills and tall buildings? For example in the Melbourne CBD there are micro cells in just about every block. I can still go up to the rialto observation tower and use my GSM phone even though I must have line of sight to a couple of dozen antennas.

    39. Re:switching the number won't work by Exocrist · · Score: 1

      TMobile charges $25 for a SIM? Cingular handed out a new one to me for free when I asked for one.

    40. Re:switching the number won't work by edis · · Score: 0

      "A GSM phone has a unique IMEI number.
      - Each GSM phone has a unique SIM card with a unique SIM number."

      frankly, tired right now, didn't even read post in all detail,
      but: is ensuring of UNIQUE performed by some gods?

      --
      Servant of karma
    41. Re:switching the number won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I was under the impression that your cell phone doesn't work in a plane because you're usually *ridiculously high up* and a *long way from any cell towers*.

    42. Re:switching the number won't work by Nikker · · Score: 1

      In fact... even if we could detect such situations in real time, I would be loath to presume that it was in fact wrong. What if those 2 switches are load sharing? What if Switch A, initiated Call #1, and then experienced a problem causing calls to be routed to Switch B? I would need to think of every possible situation to insure I didn't accidentally break functionality that ought to work.

      You do bring up some good points and I do agree as someone with telecom experience with a major provider that the system does not inheritly check for abuse of the system, but then you may have not been working with the system instead of 'on it'. I can guarentee many queries are run and analysed daily based on fraud, quality of service (dropped calls) and others. A cell phone broadcasts it's signal which ever tower recieves the signal becomes a candidate to shoulder the load. It does show up on reports that a cell was registered in one area and a call was placed on the 'same' phone in another. This is not done in 'real time' but over a course of the day as the reports come in. If your call is registered by two or more sites they track your phone to anticipate which tower will be the next to handle the call(so the call is not dropped). The system can still handle the call if two non-overlapping sites register your cell but it will be logged! Do not expect a call from a mysterious voice saying they are investigating your line much of this is done without your knowledge. Many times your account will be watched closely as to find the nature of person who cloned your phone (ie, drug deals, other types of fraud, illegal immegrants).

      The system is not bullet proof but as many on this forum would associate, it is like running queries on a web log, all of your IP data is there and by developing filters you can narrow down certain data and make reasonable assumptions. These people are in groups of over 100 and make anualy over 60k(CDN) a year to carry out these tasks. While not bullet-proof it is definately a tight grip on the situation your evrey day flea market clone normally gets kicked off the network within 24 hrs, others are detected and followed if worse comes to worse you are notified by mail and asked to bring the notice to a phone dealer for replacement (that is rare though).

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    43. Re:switching the number won't work by onenil · · Score: 1

      not to nitpick, but you made an assumption there that the poster is male, which, as far I've read, isn't necessarily the case.

    44. Re:switching the number won't work by davburns · · Score: 1
      No its not possible to have more than one sim identity active at the same time.

      I'm curious if you can explain why this is -- it seems like it would be so useful. E.G., when traveling, to have a home number and a local number both able to recive calls at the same time.
    45. Re:switching the number won't work by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      If someone went to all this trouble, wouldn't the purpose be to make "free" outgoing phone calls on that account? Their claim is that they are being billed for incoming phone calls they did not receive.

      How would it be possible for a perfectly "cloned" phone to receive incoming phone calls and yet the "real" phone never ring when the real owner got a phone call to them? Wouldn't the caller question why the wrong person answered the cell phone and contact the real owner using another method to ask why? (email, land line, visit them in person)

      When you hear hoofbeats, it is probably a horse, not a zebra. I'm betting that the partner knows something they are not telling.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    46. Re:switching the number won't work by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      That's not really a good advertisement for Logica then.
      From my experience with LogicaCMG, well, I've not been impressed. They're overly bureacratic, generally technically inept, and their business arms are tuned to make money for each other (not that this is inherently bad, but when you have outsourced technical support and helpdesk, and they have numerous elementary problems running your network, their solution is usually to bring in their own consultants, and tell you to have them rebuild applications, etc, etc, using their own application developers, or else their standard response to faults / helpdesk calls will be 'we analysed this and concluded it was the fault of x y or z, all of which we can fix, for the princely sum of $w')
    47. Re:switching the number won't work by Jo+Owen · · Score: 1

      Because it's an Ask Slashdot, and it is a technical subject.

    48. Re:switching the number won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which, speaking stereotypicly, makes the proposed situation more likely

    49. Re:switching the number won't work by Jab25 · · Score: 1

      Then let me reformulate: Why the heck is this on the MAIN page of slashdot? My main slashdot page (the standard one) says "news" for geeks. One guy getting one phone cloned is not news to anyone, it's been happenning for over 15 years. Who is this guy sleeping with to have his issue moved to the main page? Stuff that matters?

  3. Do Not Put Up With That by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something. Any advice to what this could be?
    Here's some advice: Don't take that shit.

    You're a human being. But more importantly, you're a paying customer. Call them up, get the guy's name. Inform him that if he hangs up, you'll contact his supervisor. Then ask him what zip code these calls were made from, they should be able to figure that out. Verify that it's something reasonable.

    If they won't believe you and you can convince them you're not making the calls, try calling the number and letting your phone ring. See if anyone picks up.

    If that doesn't work, simply demand they change your number for you.

    If they refuse to do that, be sure to inform them where you're taking your business.

    Personally, I'd be pretty damned pissed if anyone ever hung up on me when I was simply inquiring as to why they were charging me money. In fact, I know right where I'd file that complaint.

    If I had a credit card associated with the account, I'd call my credit card company and dispute the charge. You explain to the credit card company that they hung up on you twice. What the operator will do is put you on hold while they contact T-Mobile. The operator should introduce you to the T-Mobile rep and try to resolve the issue. If T-Mobile has a call from a credit card company, I'm certain they'll be a bit more understanding when they're looking at the possibility of having to chase down a stopped payment.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by RetardedHobo · · Score: 1

      Very helpful, Thanks!

    2. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by tuxisthefuture · · Score: 1

      Yes you should not have to put up customer service like that. I would recommend you approach something like TV's Watchdog (in the UK) and inform them of the poor customer service of T-Mobile.

    3. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by barzok · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't bother with the BBB. Your time is better spent moving up the T-Mobile chain of command. The BBB has no teeth and won't help your case against them.

      I filed a claim with the BBB a couple years ago and all I did was fill out paperwork (well, web forms). I was never interviewed by the BBB, never called by the BBB, and they never (to my knowledge) contacted the company I filed the claim against to work with them as my advocate. I have no evidence that they did anything at all.

      The hours I spent documenting & compiling everything for the BBB, everything I sent them, may as well have been pitched into a black hole.

    4. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's some advice: Don't take that shit.

      That's the best advice you'll get. You pay them to provide you with mobile phone service and in return they promise to provide that service. The onus is on them; if someone is illegally using your phone number and wracking up hundreds or thousands of dollars in calls you did not make, they have a vested interest in determining if this is true and putting a stop to it. The easiest way for them to do that is freeze yor account and issue you a new phone number. I have T-Mobile and managed to lose my phone in France; I called them immediately and they were able to freeze my account that instant, preventing anyone from making calls and I was able to get a replacement as soon as I got back.

      Try calling again -- keep calling until you get someone to listen. Try to cut right to the heart of the matter -- tell them you think someone is making calls using your number. A CSR should be able to pull up your current calling records and verify what you're terlling them easily enough.

      As an aside, why is it possible for calls from the same number to be going on simultaneously? Wouldn't there be something to prevent that, unless you were using a three-way calling option?

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by charleschuck · · Score: 1

      A small business owner friend of mine warned me about this when I had a dispute I hoped to negotiate. He said that the BBB doesn't really do anything but compile statistics on businesses, and that their only real benefit is to allow one to gauge the honesty of a business before dealing with them.

      If you want to have some teeth behind you, he suggested, contact the state attorney general's office and file a complaint.

    6. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and Watchdog wont action your complaint unless theres another 100 people complaining or they can embarress the company with it.

      Call them up, complain, write in. If its a problem with your actual account contact Otelo or Ofcom. It's also good to note that Otelo charges the company £250 for each complaint...

    7. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      It is unrealistic to threaten a cell phone company that you will take your business somewhere else. They don't care. And unless you have been with them for a couple years and use a phone that is a couple of years old you are probably under a contract that you have to pay money to get out of.

      To the original poster... How well do you trust your partner? If you were the only person on the plan then you'd have an easy case to argue. Since it is a family plan I think you will find some difficulty arguing this with the carrier. Also, since you used the word partner to describe the other person on the family plan rather than husband, wife, son, or daughter I think you might run into some biggotry when dealing with this.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    8. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by julesh · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      You can't put up with shoddy customer service like this. You're paying them... this means it is up to them to deal with your concerns. If someone hangs up on you, call back. Whoever you get through to, ask to speak to their manager. Tell the manager that you want to complain about somebody who hung up on you. If you're lucky, the employee will have made a note in your file about your call. If you're not, then you may have to persuade the manager to talk to the database management department to get a trace on the last employee who accessed your records before the manager did. They should be willing to do this. If they aren't, go up a level. Eventually, if they continue resisting, you'll end up talking to the call centre manager (it's hard to get higher than this). Such people are usually cooperative.

      Threaten to move your account. Threaten to file complaints with any appropriate regulatory bodies. Threaten legal action. Threaten to go to the press. Threats can get you a long way, but always be nice about it. Be reasonable. People will deal with you if you seem like you'll be reasonable.

    9. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by nfgaida · · Score: 1

      Opposite experience for me. I was having a hard time getting Sprint to let me out of my contract. (my house had no service, but they claimed that I did).

      The day after I submitted the claim to BBB, Sprint called me and let me out without paying.

      I live in minnesota though, maybe our branch is actually effective.

      --
      *elevator music plays*
    10. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by pizpot · · Score: 1

      To the poster: Hint hint, your partner is having an affair. LOL!

    11. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by tuxisthefuture · · Score: 1

      Lets all right in and complain on their behalf :-)

    12. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by faraway · · Score: 1

      Are you SURE you sent the paperwork to the right place? I have found the BBB to be very effective and they are *QUICK* to get things done. The I've had great response time and outcome from the California BBB/PUC.

    13. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by theotherbastard · · Score: 1

      Funny, something similar happened to me a few years back.

      Thought I was being ripped off by some auto repair place and filed a complaint with the BBB. Never heard anything back.

      --
      Buttons aren't toys.
    14. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by mutterc · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not very many people know quite what the BBB's powers are:
      • Stats collection, as others have noticed. Anyone can get a report on a company and find out how many complaints (and, more importantly, unresolved complaints) have been filed.
      • If the company is a BBB member, then all complaints must get resolved (note that this doesn't mean resolved in the customer's favor), or the company's membership gets dropped. BBB provides arbitration to facilitate this.
      That's pretty much it.

      A selection of things they can't do:

      • Force any company to do anything. They can terminate a member's membership (and keep them from using the BBB logo, etc.) but that's it. They have no authority at all over non-members.
      • Know about every company. (E.g. I can go into business without notifying anybody except licensing boards and taxing authorities; I certainly don't need the BBB's permission).
      • Tell you some company is legit, non-legit, a scam or not, etc. You have to make up your own mind after reading the report. (Think of the slander lawsuits, even from scamsters!) There are exceptions for blantantly illegal things like foreign lotteries, fake cashier's check scams, etc.
      • Give customers legal advice (the legal industry would rather they didn't, and BBB CSR's would rather not be liable for practicing law without a license). They'll certainly refer you to the AG, postal inspectors, etc. if you want help putting the legal smackdown on a scamster. If you just want to know whether something a company did was legal, gotta ask a real lawyer.
    15. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Javi0084 · · Score: 0

      I filed a complaint against ATT Wireless with the BBB. ATT would not refund me charges for text messaging that were suppose to be free for a month. A few days after I filed the complaint, an ATT rep called me (about the complaint) and credited my account. I think the BBB does have some teeth.

    16. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by barzok · · Score: 1

      This was a BBB chapter in south Florida, and all indications from the website were that theirs was the correct website to work through for the county where the business I had trouble with was located.

    17. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Ignignot · · Score: 1

      The way this story is written makes me think that the whole thing is a troll. When was the last time you've heard of any customer service rep hanging up on a person? Never. They'd get fired for it.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    18. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by SillySnake · · Score: 1

      If you know anyone that is a lawyer have them mail t-mobile a letter explaining what you'd like done.. They'll get back to you quickly I'm sure :) This is one of those cases where having a prepaid legal thing sorta comes in handy.. It's like $25 a month, but each $40 charge helps the service pay for itself. A friend of mine once got a $1500 bill from Sprint and used the lawyer letter method with great success :)

    19. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've heard many similar stories regarding filing complaints against Sprint with the BBB. Apparently Sprint doesn't try very hard until you either get transferred to Retentions or file with the BBB. Then they will make SURE you are happy.

    20. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about often?
      Happens to me with my bank, cell provider, comcast.... in fact there have only been two companies in recent memory that haven't hung up on me... the company administrating my school loans, and compaq support for my laptop.

      It happens often that you get shoddy CSRs.... people that would rather be sleeping, surfing myspace, etc than helping the customer out.

      Unless you spend time working in that environment, you just don't understand it.

    21. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by zxnos · · Score: 1
      similar experience. a car dealer misrepresented a deal to sell my used car for me. she laughed in my face, on the showroom floor, after i demanded she refund my money. i called the BBB, next day she called me and asked me to pick up my car and the receipt showing my money refunded to my credit card. i recently learned that this dealer no longer employs that woman or offers to sell peoples used cars.

      i also had poor service from bestbuy/geek squad. i sent in my laptop to be repaired, not under warranty. it came back unfixed. they sent it back out to be fixed, it came back fixed but cosmetically damaged. i spoke with the manager and wrote a couple letters during the whole ordeal. they did the repair for free. a couple hundred dollar loss for them.

      raise a stink and most places fix things 'good enough.'

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    22. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Moqui · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Probably because the BBB is really nothing more than an organization founded to extort from businesses a form of "protection" money.

    23. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Mortanius · · Score: 2, Informative

      Late last year and early this year I did a nine-month stint at Radio Shack, dealing a lot with both Sprint and Cingular customer service (oddly I almost never had to call Verizon for anything, their activation system worked like a charm for me), and yeah, cell phone companies hang up on everyone, even people selling phones for them. There's always a few bad apples, just call back and ask to go straight to a supervisor, make sure to get everyone's name that you talk to just in case.

      And at the same time, remember, the CSR's aren't always able to give you the information you're asking them to, they aren't always just trying to brush you off. Instead of getting angry and shouting and cursing and, in one case, farting over the phone (go figure), just get their name and talk to a supervisor, they may still not be able to help you but might be able to direct you to someone who can.

      While eldavojohn's suggestion may well be what it comes do, don't come out of the gate guns blazing, demanding this and that and not letting the rep speak. We're all humans, in spite of our best efforts if the person on the other end of the phone responds to our "Thanks for calling-" by shouting and demanding things without letting us speak, there's going to be some level of agitation, and that's going to interfere with reaching an acceptable resolution. Stay calm and be firm yet polite and things will be worked out with much less stress and much more quickly than they would be otherwise.

      And please, for the love of god, don't file complaints against people like RS employees who don't even work directly for the phone companies, our hands are very tied in what we can do with the carriers. Being in a relatively well-to-do area, everyone had a holier-than-thou attitude and I ended up dealing with calls from my superiors almost daily about my employees who honestly did everything they could to make things right but just didn't have the power. Yeah, it's a pain to have to deal with middlemen who are forced to basically ask you to hold on while we get Sprint|Verizon|Cingular|Alltel|US Cellular|NEXTEL on the phone, but remember too though that most of the time we have our own numbers to use that take us straight to the people who (generally) have a clue.

      (sorry, got ranty on that last one. :-P)

    24. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      The BBB has been effective for me in the past. Not immediately, but they were effective. It took a few weeks, but the money was returned to me. It also helped against a collection agency that was abusing the FDCA.

      I never expect services I don't pay for to be prompt, so perhaps you should give the BBB a little time.

    25. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happens to me with my bank, cell provider, comcast.... in fact there have only been two companies in recent memory that haven't hung up on me... You must be a joy to do business with :)

    26. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Unless you spend time working in that environment, you just don't understand it.

      I worked in that environment for 3 years. I understand it quite well...and the only time you ever hang up on someone is if they are being a complete a-hole, or there's a connection problem. If there's a connection problem, I always tried to call them back.

      So which is it for you?

    27. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      You're a paying customer. But more importantly, you're a human being.

      Fixed.

    28. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the BBB is worthless. Their main agenda is business, not customers, and no way in hell are they going to go to bat for you. They're there to protect the industry - say you're getting ripped off by a roofing contractor, that makes the legit contractos look bad so they MIGHT help then.

      Contact your state's Attorney General. If you're in Illinois, DON'T try to call both, as if you contact the BBB the AG won't help (been there, done that, our AG is a waste of tax money).

      Or as a previous poster noted, call your local cops.

    29. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Lusa · · Score: 1

      As an aside, why is it possible for calls from the same number to be going on simultaneously? Wouldn't there be something to prevent that, unless you were using a three-way calling option?

      I've done that before, my phone has (or had) a second line. Can be a bit expensive though unless they're incoming. I do wonder if this feature was available and bluetooth was enabled that a second call could be made.

    30. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I had a credit card associated with the account, I'd call my credit card company and dispute the charge. You explain to the credit card company that they hung up on you twice. What the operator will do is put you on hold while they contact T-Mobile. The operator should introduce you to the T-Mobile rep and try to resolve the issue. If T-Mobile has a call from a credit card company, I'm certain they'll be a bit more understanding when they're looking at the possibility of having to chase down a stopped payment.

      +1 for that advice.

      I've had wonderful experience with my credit card company helping resolve disputes with retailers.

      My best experience in this was when I was traveling oversees (in Taiwan) and discussing charges on my Hotel bill with someone who spoke very little english and I spoke very little chinese. I called Visa/Wells-Fargo's international collect-call # and they immediately conferenced in an excellent translator who resolved everything immediately. (In this case everyone was being fair, just translating math expressions incorrectly.)

      The result - 2 people (one end-user customer, and one merchant) who were very frustrated became happy with Visa and Wells Fargo.

    31. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Detritus · · Score: 1

      They don't hang up on you, they just "accidentally" push the wrong button or transfer you to the twilight zone.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    32. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by barzok · · Score: 1

      It's been over 2 years since I filed my complaint.

      I did actually get a refund from the company a couple months ago due to a number of the items that I had purchased arriving broken, but there was no mention of it being a BBB-inspired action - they just said they were cleaning out records and found my refund request.

    33. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by thc69 · · Score: 1

      You are correct on all points. I must add, however, for the people who haven't realized it:

      The BBB is NOT a government agency, nor is it government-sponsored or in any way associated with the government. It's just a for-profit company, like Consumer Reports or T-Mobile. They do, however, have one power -- the general public is under the impression that they're a government agency.

      This comment describes the BBB.

      It's my understanding that when somebody queries about the status of a dues-paying business, they will get a description of roses, as much as possible while staying within the bounds of truth. When somebody queries about a non-member business, if there are no complaints, then they might as well be told "Well, we have nothing on them, but..."; and if there has been a complaint, they at least get "Stay away from that company, they're trouble", or worse.

      My company is a member; in our industry, potential customers often check with the BBB. Either way, there's never in over 30 years been a complaint, but this way we get to say we're members, and we're also assured of good reviews.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    34. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      you are probably under a contract that you have to pay money to get out of.
      This happened to me. I had a contract with about a year left on it, lost my job, had to move. The carrier had no service in the area I moved to. Every call was roaming. The charges were hideous. I complained that I shouldn't have to pay to get out of the contract because they had ageed to provide me service, but clearly were not able to do so. But even I could admit that it was my fault for moving to an area where that company didn't have any service.
      I know the contracts sound great, since they let you get exciting new phones pretty cheap, but in the end, statistics say the phone companies will make money off of it, so you're better off finding a no-contract carrier.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    35. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Use your lawyers letterhead. It's cheaper. You can then put CC:. Even if you don't send the lawyer a copy (which would probably cost you money), it usually gets the company's attention.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    36. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I've had American Express cancel payments about three times on Shoddy retailers. Most of the time it is because my otherwise well-meaning wife has purchased a one time gift from the Home Shopping Channel or Richard Simmons for someone's birthday, and the subhuman bastard merchants start charging us every month, whether or not they actually continue sending out product. I have had to call Amex on Richard Simmons three months in a row and they didn't even send out any product, just billed us. The home shopping network has gotten clever and masks everything you buy from any vendor behind their corporate name, so you don't have any real clue as to what charge is what.
      Now my wife understands that anything that you can buy off the TV is a scam, so we don't have this problem any more, but Amex has been a lifesaver. Now if only they would automatically reject charges from scammers like HSN and Richard Simmons, but then their first objective is to make money, so if people get scammed and pay the money, Amex wins, too. Either way, they come out the good guy.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    37. Re:Do Not Put Up With That by Sunny7L · · Score: 1

      The BBB is evil. I filed a complaint against a tire shop and they went ahead and fowarded my name, phone and address to the company.

      I guess I should be grateful they only called and cussed me out.

  4. I've had this problem also.. by GonzoTech · · Score: 5, Informative
    .. With Verizon Wireless. They wouldn't help me resolve the issue over tech support forums, or through phone call tech support. Know how I got it fixed?

    I showed up at a Verizon Wireless sales center, yelling and complaining (trust me, I can throw quite the tantrum,) until a manager finally got in touch with someone to fix the issue.

    I got three months of free service for the trouble.. and since I've had perfect phone bills.

    Never underestimate the power of being an ass when you're not treated fairly..

    --
    "Snatching defeat from the mouth of victory on a daily basis."
    1. Re:I've had this problem also.. by codemaster2b · · Score: 0

      Sure, that will work. In fact you can get your way, but you are nothing better than a spoilt child. I prefer not to hurt people to get what I want.

      --
      And over there we have the labyrinth guards. One always lies, one always tells the truth, and one stabs people who ask t
    2. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to amend your statement: "Never underestimate the power of being an ass when you are treated fairly."

      There, much better. : p Jokes aside, I completely agree with you. While resolving things in a civil manner is preferable, there simply are times when you do need to throw a fit in order to get them to take you seriously. Sad state of affairs, this world we live in...

    3. Re:I've had this problem also.. by mickford · · Score: 1

      Going into store-fronts and throwing tantrums may make you feel better but spare a thought for the poor employee you're hurling at: in most cases they will be more inclined do give more help if you approach civilly. Be mad, but don't direct it at front-end employeees: it's not their fault.

    4. Re:I've had this problem also.. by HavokDevNull · · Score: 1

      Remind me not to go through the Drive Thru at a fast food joint with you!

      =)

      --
      Sig
    5. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Finque · · Score: 5, Interesting
      A properly trained front-end employee will hand over an unsatisfied (and unruly) customer to a manager ASAP. A manager is specially trained to handle situations like that. The GP took the quick road to getting results - no cell store wants someone screaming about their service, they could lose potential customers. I've watched managers bend over backwards for someone who's screaming.

      Besides, by working at a place where you deal with the public, you basically agree to be yelled at.

    6. Re:I've had this problem also.. by mosch · · Score: 1

      I've received very similar results by being polite but firm.

      Never overestimate the power of being an ass. There's usually a better way.

    7. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I can agree with you but there are the employees that do have a primadonna attitude and won't go the extra mile to understand the real problem nor get to the root of it.

      In some cases, as long as the contract as expired, it's just easier to quit the service. In my case, I've been with T-Mobile and never had a real problem. Soon, I will have to cancel as they don't provide service in my new area and my only choice is Cingular. So in a sense, Cingular has the monopoly in my new area.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    8. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Do not try this at Best Buy.

    9. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be an American.

      You catch more flies with honey

    10. Re:I've had this problem also.. by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Wow, such civility. I bet you sat on the ground throwing a screaming fit when your mom wouldn't buy you candy at the grocery store too.

      While yelling may get you quick results, I have put my fair amount of time in the computer retail business in the past. At the store I worked at, anyone throwing a tantrum as you described would be asked to leave by loss prevention. And if that didn't work the police would be called. I have never once seen a customer get what they want there because of throwing a fit. However, I have seen customers get a fair deal by acting like a civil human being.

      No one deserves to be yelled at when at work like that. That is why i think everyone should put in a year of mandatory retail labor to see what its like to be the one behind the counter.

      --
      I got nothin'
    11. Re:I've had this problem also.. by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure he only escalated the tantrum when they didn't want to help him. I've seen customers start off with the tantrum and be asked to leave and eventually thrown out by a phone call to the cops. Funny thing is, it was at a Verizon and Cingular store. Usually, if you stay calm on the phone, but remain assertive and unwavering, they'll take care of you. I've had many billing issues with both Verizon and Cingular that were both resolved with a good deal of phone work.

      In college there was a kid who went around and stole about 8 credit card numbers, mine included. Then looked us up in the roster and started buying stuff. He used mine for an internet porn site that charged 60 bucks a month. I didn't notice it until three months later when my dad called to tell me that I got an overdraft fee notice in the mail. (quite pissed off, too). When I found out where my 180 bucks went, I called up the company and demanded my money back. They didn't want anything to do with that, saying that it was my responsability to keep track of my things. I calmly countered with, "Isn't it your responsability to properly validate ID's?" A few seconds of silence later and the lady gave me to her manager and I repeated myself when he said he couldn't help. I got my money back, plus 44 bucks for overdrafts. Then the bank refunded the overdrafts, so I came out ahead.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    12. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      Going into store-fronts and throwing tantrums may make you feel better but spare a thought for the poor employee you're hurling at: in most cases they will be more inclined do give more help if you approach civilly. Be mad, but don't direct it at front-end employeees: it's not their fault.

      I agree that it may not be a good place to start from, but I've been treated very poorly by CSRs in many places in L.A. They don't listen, don't care and know they won't be fired for being useless. And if I made just above minimum wage to deal with the public, I'd have the same attitude.

      Sometime, you just have to be an ass to get what you need.

    13. Re:I've had this problem also.. by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      "No one deserves to be yelled at when at work like that."

      Really? Wow. You must live in some alternative universe I'm not quite familiar with.

      I interact with salespeople, who do deserve to get yelled at, just about once in every two weeks or so. I rarely do, of course, yell at them, because it's just not worth my time, but I really have to bite my tongue not to. Instead I simply walk out the store, and go to the next retailer that sells the same merchandise. And I never go back to that place again.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    14. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      >A properly trained front-end employee will hand over an unsatisfied (and unruly) customer to a manager ASAP

      You really meant to say:
      A properly trained front-end employee working in an ideal environment will hand over an unsatisfied (and unruly) customer to a manager ASAP

      Many companies do not have set escalation paths, or their use is discouraged (particularly true with outsourced phone banks... even continental US callcenters). If escalating a call earns you (or your boss, or your call center) a black mark, it won't happen. Besides, reps that use "yelling" as an excuse to hang up are often loved by managers -- they have shorter call times and take more calls. It looks good on paper.

      No, I don't work in an outsourced call center, but I often have to interface with company Support elsewhere. If I don't have an official tech contact, it really sucks and requires 3 days to get to a real company employee at Router-Vendor-X. I have to use email because, well, I don't speak English with an Indian accent.

      Ideally, a company has an escalation path. It just makes sense because the front line people can stay busy on the easy stuff, while the "supervisor" handles damage control. People automatically feel better being escalated, even if the communication problem was their doing. They feel special, talking less and listening more (so you can fix the problem instead of listening to anger).

    15. Re:I've had this problem also.. by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Setting foot in a Best Buy is like sticking your head in a lion's mouth. Too risky for my taste.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    16. Re:I've had this problem also.. by doughrama · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Seriously, being an ass doesn't always get you what you want. In my previous life where I did tech support for an ISP, I would only offer the bare minimum (at best) of help for the assholes that called in. However, if you were pleasant I'd bend over backwards doing everything I could (including bending/breaking policy) for you. In fact I became so aware of my attitude and actions towards the different types of customers I had to deal with that I decided to try being overly nice to see if it was easy to get my way. turns out, it *almost* always works... And sometimes it's super fun! And sometimes the people you talk to are just dicks and nothing is gonna work.

      My favorite CSR story happened a long time ago when I had a dial-up account... I didn't pay the bill for three months and they shut off the account. So I called up Earthlink (I think) to pay the bill in full and get the account turned back on. I was unemployed at the time so money was tight. In any case I talked to the tech support guy, being very nice and polite the entire time. For whatever reason he was apparently having a bad day and decided that he was going to take it out on me. I kept my composure, and just rebuffed his attitude towards me by continuing to be nice. As I was getting the billing straightened out, he told me that they had a $40 (I think) reconnect fee. Having been in the dial-up ISP business previously (not with this ISP though,) I was totally confident that waiving the re-connect fee was entirely up to the CSR. Keep in mind, this CSR had had an attitude with me this entire time up to this point. So I asked him "Would you please waive the reconnect fee?" You could hear the devilish joy in his voice as he prepared to smack me down "What is the reason that your reconnect fee should be waived?" He was sooo excited when he asked me that because he knew I didn't have a good reason, I simply didn't pay the bill and he was more than ready to tell me no. So rather than get pissed, like I wanted to (it was like he was taunting me,) I decided to go for it and say the stupidest thing ever. "Because I'm a nice guy." There was a rather long pause as his attitude shifted from an evil glee to astonishment. He said, with an extremely condescending tone, "You want me to waive the reconnect fee because you're a nice guy?" I almost burst out laughing, having suddenly realized the ridiculousness of my request. I paused for half a moment and simply said "Yes." I judged the situation slightly wrong though, turns out this CSR didn't have full discretion over the reconnect fee like I had at my old job. My response wasn't on his script so he couldn't say yes or no - he had to get permission from his supervisor. This was like the greatest revenge ever, considering his treatment towards me. With an irritated, but confident tone he said "I'll have to go talk to my supervisor about this, please hold." and off he went. I sat on my end just reveling in the whole mess, I was ruining this guy day by simply being nice and polite, and the harder he tried to ruin my day the worse his was getting. A couple minutes goes by he gets back on the phone. Totally indignant, he proceeds to tell me "We're going to go ahead and reconnect the account, along with waiving the fee. We are ONLY GOING TO DO THIS, THIS ONCE. WE WILL NEVER WAIVE THE FEE FOR YOU AGAIN!" The volume and authority in his voice went way up in the last bit, he finally got his little opportunity to inflict what pain he could on me. I said "ok, thanks." And that was it.

      Had I gotten all pissy and demanded I speak to a supervisor I for sure would've been shutdown down one way or another, by being nice I got to have a lot of fun and get my way.

    17. Re:I've had this problem also.. by zardo · · Score: 0

      I turn into an asshole at the slightest sensation that I may be due for some free shit. I got 3 months free (a $300 value) and 2 free phones by being an asshole. I feel sorry for men who are incapable of it because they are at a serious disadvantage. You should have picked up Asshology in high school, otherwise people will walk all over you, especially when it comes to earning a buck (sales rep initially lied to me, that's why I went for the freebies).

    18. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people need to read "How to win friends and influence people".

      Yelling (on the phone) will get you nowhere. I am a CSR and I screw over rude abusive customers.

      1. At the start of the call, politely ask the name/ID of CSR (you can use this info if they drop your call)

      2. Be nice and polite, but insist they fix your bill or transfer you to a manager. Don't ask for the manager right off the bat. Don't threaten to cancel your account -- the level 1 CSR doesn't care and is not incented to retain customers (they may be trained to, but with no commission they don't care).

      3. Write a letter with copies of bills and send it registered mail. This demonstrates you have a litigious mindset, and will get their attention.

    19. Re:I've had this problem also.. by toleraen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The GP took the quick road to getting results

      Huh. Last time I walked into a sprint store to drop my service and take care of some weird billing, I just walked up to a sales rep and asked to speak with a manager about account issues I was having. They walked me over to the manager, and I got things taken care of. All without making myself look like a total jackass! It's amazing what being a decent person gets you every once in a while.

    20. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      This has always worked for me.

      In regards to the original poster - When talking to the CSRs, don't start making uneducated guesses as to what is happening. Cloning is INCREDIBLY rare these days, and for various reasons pretty much doesn't work for theft of service (see earlier posts...). As a result, bringing it up will probably cause the CSR to begin thinking you're an idiot/get frustrated with you.

      Simply call them up, and state the cold hard facts. You have unexplained incoming calls without caller ID which do not cause your phone to ring, and also which sometimes overlapped with actual calls you DID make. For technical reasons, I don't think it's cloning. For technical reasons, it COULD be something caused by a misconfiguration of their billing system's handling of data service. In the past, some providers would give "minutes only usage" for high speed data services such as CDMA2000 1xRTT service, and (possibly, I'm only familiar with Verizon in this regard) for GPRS service too. Also, most CDMA2000 phones (maybe GPRS/EDGE too?) support simultaneous voice and data. i.e. the phone can be connected to a data call and still receive incoming calls. Yes, even though 1xRTT/1xEV-DO are packet data, there's essentially a low level heartbeat on the connection that is considered a "call". Usually the minutes of these "calls" are free and do not even show up in your plan summary, only the actual data usage does. Again, on some older plans and data services tacked onto legacy plans, it WAS possible to be charged per-minute instead of per-kilobyte or even per-kilobyte AND per-minute (rare though). Data "calls" could often be initiated without the users' knowledge unless specific settings were disabled in the phone, ones which were normally enabled by default because purchasing an unlimited data plan was strongly encouraged with most such phones. I believe this is one of the main reasons Verizon discontinued MOU data pricing.

      As such, those unknown calls COULD be related to some sort of data capability. Don't mention this to the customer service rep as a guess though. Just the known facts.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    21. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      As someone who worked in retail, and is very glad to be out of it, I will say that yelling and screaming is very effective, because a lot of retail employees have very weak spines. However, please, please please please, try asking nicely first. Most clerks are more than happy to do whatever they can for you out of genuine sympathy if you come in and ask politely. If that doesn't work feel free to throw the tantrum, but you always run the risk of running into me, and about one of my dozen former manager who will shut you down, no questions asked, quiet down or you're out of the buildin. Won't leave the building? You'll be leaving in squad car (or at least next to it, as they rearely arrest people for things like that here). The situation is probably different for cell providers, but big box store have absolutely no shortage of customers and sometimes keeping a "loyal customer" is far more expensive than having them never come back again.

    22. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother and roommate both work at an outsourced call center that deals with T-Mobile and Verizon (go figure) customers. They both make just a bit over $14 an hour, which would be over min wage.

    23. Re:I've had this problem also.. by dajalas · · Score: 1

      Some years back we added a camera phone to our Verizon account. We had to sign up for a new rate plan. This was a national rate plan. It included free long distance and roaming. It was also a family share plan so that all four of our phones could share the same minutes.

      Months later, after many, many phone calls, hang ups, and promises to call me back that never happened, here was the situation:

      1 - The phones were still not on the originally-promised rate plan when we switched to another cellular provider.

      2 - We were been billed for long distance and roaming that was supposed to be free.

      3 - Verizon extended the contract end date by repeatedly changing my rate plan without permission. The only rate plan change I authorized was the one we were supposed to get with the camera phone.

      4 - One Verizon representative told me, "(she didn't) care" about the original contract.

      5 - Verizon demanded I buy extra equipment before they would honor the original contract. They offered no way to leave the contract without paying unreasonable charges. Their only solution was to buy the additional equipment.

      6 - Even if we purchased the equipment, Verizon customer reps refused to provide any written documentation of their promises to fix the account.

      7 - I have told Verizon I would continue with their service if they:
      A - Move the contract end date back to the agreed end date for all phones.
      B - Remove the roaming and long distance charges that should have been free under the nation calling plan we signed up for.
      C - Verizon's representatives refused.

      8 - Verizon's customer reps indicated Verizon planned to charge me $175 per phone to terminate the contract. I refused to pay these charges since Verizon has never honored the contract I signed.

      9 - We have moved to another cellular provider.

      10 - Verizon damaged our credit, so we've contacted an attorney. Texas allows triple recovery for fraudulent business practices.

    24. Re:I've had this problem also.. by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the power of being an ass when you're not treated fairly..

      As someone on the other side of the counter (well, retail customer service, not in the telecom industry), I'd like to propose just the opposite: never underestimate the power of being friendly. I find that, without trying, I tend to reciprocate the customer's attitude. While I wouldn't intentionally cause more problems for a customer (although there are plenty of people who would), there's a world of difference between what I have to do for you in order to keep my job, and what I could do for you if I was so inclined. As an example, people will often come in tell me that they were overcharged earlier in the day, but they don't have a receipt to show it. I have no obligation to do anything in this case, and my manager will back me up on this. However, I know from experience that he'll trust my judgment if I refund the difference without a receipt, and that I can make a good case for why I felt compelled to throw in some extra store credit. So what determines whether I tell you I can't help you, or whether I bend the rules and even throw in some bonuses? Mostly, whether you're being a jerk or being friendly.

      The point at which a customer starts yelling, by the way, is the point at which we ask if they'd like to leave the premises with or without police involvement. If someone's wronged you, don't give them an excuse to get a restraining order against you. (Although it only happens once in a blue moon, there are outstanding restraining orders where I work. A friend who works, ironically enough, in a Verizon store mentioned a few weeks ago that they'd had to take one out against someone.)

      The way I see it, if customer service reps are the people you're asking to do something for you, doesn't it stand to reason that you'd want to get on their good side?

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    25. Re:I've had this problem also.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would only offer the bare minimum (at best) of help

      This tidbit and the rest of your bullshit diatribe make you sound like a fucking asshole.

    26. Re:I've had this problem also.. by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Such is the state of the world. If you are not an ass from time to time, you will not get what was promised you. You will not get your car fixed under warranty even when it is covered. Your company will not reimburse your expenses when they promised. You will not be given an annual review or raise, you will be shorted fries at McDonalds, you will be overcharged on phone bills for calls you didn't make, you will be billed for 976 numbers you didn't call, etc, etc. "You get what you pay for" is BS. You MAY get what you pay for, if you grab onto it with both hands and scream and yell, otherwise, you will get less.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    27. Re:I've had this problem also.. by doughrama · · Score: 1

      Mr. Earthink CSR, is that you?

  5. Why make things difficult? by gellenburg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why make it more complicated than it needs to be?

    Just dispute those calls with T-Mobile and let them figure it out.

    If your bill was over by $40 go back and tell them you didn't receive this call, you didn't receive that call, didn't make that call, etc.

    They have the data to know when and where the calls were received based on the cell towers that the phone was received from.

    Keep escalating the issue dude.

    Call back and immediately ask to speak with a supervisor.

    Get names.

    Record the dates and time you called and who you spoke with.

    Keep escalating up the chain of command if you have to.

    If that doesn't work, file a formal complaint with the FCC and your State's Public Service Commission. That'll definitely get their attention.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Why make things difficult? by winnabago · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They have the data to know when and where the calls were received based on the cell towers that the phone was received from.
      He mentioned that there is overlap, but only (in this example) by one minute. I would look for a more obvious instance, and on the same number, because this one could be explained by loose rounding to the next minute.


      Also, aren't bills with multiple numbers broken down by call to/from each phone? Mine is, I believe.

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    2. Re:Why make things difficult? by srussell · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Get names.
      Excellent advice. I'd like to add that this one bit of advice is the most powerful thing you can do. Every time you talk to customer service, the very first thing you do is get the name of the person you're talking to. The whole name, first and last. Make sure you understand it. If they mumble, ask them to repeat it until you understand it. It doesn't hurt to ask them to confirm the spelling if you have any doubt about it. I usually write it down while I'm talking, if it is convenient.

      Then, and only then, start discussing the reason that you called. It also helps to use their name while you're talking to them, to remind them that you really did keep track of the name.

      I find that this makes more difference in how good the customer service is than any other tactic you can try. Yes, a rep can give you a bogus name, but I haven't had a single one give me attitude or hang up on me since I started doing this. I also try to not be too much of an asshole; I tend to say things like "I know that it isn't your fault that I'm having this problem, but it is really pissing me off, and I want it fixed."

      As per the original post, I've found T-Mobile to give superb customer service, but I've been with them since forever, so they probably like me.

      --- SER

  6. Suggestions by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    1. Have you considered going into a T-Mobile store so they can't "hang up on you"?

    2. I don't understand why they *would* "hang up on you", since you seem to have fairly reasonable records that you're receiving calls you didn't receive, and indeed, overlapping onto calls that you've made. Why would they think you're running a scam when you're asking questions about calls you didn't place on your bill?

    3. Are you SURE your partner isn't really receiving these calls? I.e., have you been with him at known times when these alleged calls have come in?

    1. Re:Suggestions by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      3. Are you SURE your partner isn't really receiving these calls? I.e., have you been with him at known times when these alleged calls have come in?

      I didn't get this part of the story. On my "Family Plan" bill from Verizon there are completely separate sections for each phone showing the calls made to and from that particular phone. I would assume that T-mobile indicates which phone the calls are being made to or from on its bill as well. No need to question the partner if the calls are being charged to the poster's phone. On the other hand ...

  7. Get in T-Mobile's Face by rizzo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did you really need to "Ask Slashdot" about this? If T-Mobile's CSRs hung up on you, then you march down to the nearest store and let loose on the first salesperson you see. You *should* have gotten the names of those CSRs (I always make a point of writing down the person's name when I call any kind of support) to give to whoever it is that finally *does* take your complaint. Either they or their manager should be fired.

    And, once you get this issue resolved, leave T-Mobile.

    --

    "More organs means more human." - Zim

    1. Re:Get in T-Mobile's Face by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      I had a problem with AT&T (Cingular) for a while. I was unable to send or receive text messages. So, I called. They had me reboot the phone, try to send a text message, and try to receive a text message. I was unemployed, so I found this amusing for the first couple of weeks -- calling every day, sometimes several times a day. They don't talk to eachother. Every time I called, it was like it was a new problem. Eventually, the CSRs told me to take it to the Cingular store, which I did. The guy behind the counter was confused as to why the CSR told me to go to the store, and directed me to a telephone in the parking lot where I could call back into the company system. I made a stink. I talked to the manager. They wouldn't do anything. Eventually I fixed the problem myself -- I fsck'd the MMC card in my Nokia 3650. I want a new phone, and a new carrier. T-Mobile is the runner up. I won't even think of Verizon.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    2. Re:Get in T-Mobile's Face by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      No. He shoudl contact the POLICE. I dont know how you do things in US. But in UK, thats the first point of call to ANY fraudulant or criminal use of a phone system.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    3. Re:Get in T-Mobile's Face by HuckleCom · · Score: 0

      I can't believe this B.S. This is the third mentioning of 'letting loose' on the first sales rep you see. What did the sales rep do to deserve attitude? It's not their fault your stuff got messed up. If anyone can help you get your foot in the door it's them so don't piss them off. I suggest you approach the Sales Rep and explain the issue in face calmly, mentioning the reps hanging up. I promise it'll be just as effective and you won't feel like an asshole when you walk out of the store.

    4. Re:Get in T-Mobile's Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people all suck.

      Why crap on some poor schmo working at the retail store? They get paid too little to take this from some self righteous punk like everyone else. Not everyone can be an uber-computer-technology person that gets paid well.

      Someone's gotta mop the floors, don't crap on them for it.

      There's a difference between being firm and being an ass. Being an ass makes you just that.

  8. The question is... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I still do not think this is enough evidence to convince T-mobile of Phone Cloning. So I am thinking of switching either my number or my service provider.

    You ask the question, "Has my cell number been cloned?" I ask the more pressing question... "Has your brain turned to mush?" DUH, if you're getting calls that you're not getting, then there's a problem.

    You say "Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something." I say, you need to adjust your message to give them the facts -- customer support reps are only human. If you ramble on with your life story, or rant and rave, or interject useless details, then you might get hung up on. But T-Mobile gave me good service when I had them (I only dropped them because they didn't have good service in the middle of nowhere, where I live). If you call and say "Here are the calls that I neither made nor received. Please remove them from my bill and block me from ever recieving calls from the associated numbers." I can't imagine they'd refuse.

    There's also the distinct possibility that the owner of the second line isn't being straight with you. I'm reminded of a poem I read on the bus:

    By the time you swear you're his,
    Shivering and sighing,
    And he vows his passion is
    Infinite, undying -
    Lady, make a note of this:
    One of you is lying.

    -Dorothy Parker, Unfortunate Coincidence

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:The question is... by GonzoTech · · Score: 1, Funny
      There's also the distinct possibility that the owner of the second line isn't being straight with you.

      Haha, you don't say? Hmmm... look at the language..

      .. not being straight with you.. haha, you think?

      --
      "Snatching defeat from the mouth of victory on a daily basis."
    2. Re:The question is... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      That's a queer thing to say...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:The question is... by nasch · · Score: 1
      DUH, if you're getting calls that you're not getting, then there's a problem.
      I'll say! Like some kind of problem with reality.
    4. Re:The question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's one of my very favorite poems! excellent!

  9. Re:My "partner"? by electronerdz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow... that was uncalled for. I had assumed by partner, he meant business partner. I will be taking on a business partner soon, and I would put him in a "family" plan if I had that type of service, because inter-calling would free in most cases. Even if it isn't his "business" partner, so what? Why do you have to use all the language? And of course, you assume the first person is a guy.

    --
    Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
  10. Re:Uh... by Nevynxxx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I take it it is possible to recieve calls from yourself, on your own phone, whilst simultainiously making another outgoing call then?

    Very Well done.

    now please learn to read.

  11. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you're a dumber ass who doesn't know what an INCOMING call is?

  12. Come out of the closet, self hating fag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nowhere in the article does it say 2bepissedoff is a guy. Some women, especially in the tech world, hide their gender and use the word partner because they would rather have horny IT guys assume they are gay than a girl. Now ask yourself, why would "faggot" be the first thing to pop into your head? Why would such graphic images pop into your head? What is your subconscious trying to tell you? It's okay, stop hating yourself and admit what you are and what you like. You'll feel better in the end (pun intended.) People may make fun of you for it, but most of them are self hating fags, too.

  13. walk in by Nate+Fox · · Score: 1

    physically go to one of the tmobile stores and talk to them. bring your phone bill and show them what you just explained to us. it's hard for a physical person to hang up on you (and comment that two support ppls had hung up on you!)

  14. While we're throwing labels around by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're a self-righteous tosser. He's not talking about 'getting what he wants', he's talking about not being conned out of his money by Verizon. And what does "hurting people" have to do with anything, apart from making him sound worse in comparison to you?

    1. Re:While we're throwing labels around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also a self-righteous tosser. Instead of reading the initial post and realising that the poster appears to be female, you just come out with the male pronouns.

    2. Re:While we're throwing labels around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're either an ignorant tosser, or yet another self-rigteous one with a stupid agenda.

      Assuming the former: He/His are appropriate usage for a person of unspecified or neutral gender.

    3. Re:While we're throwing labels around by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > He/His are appropriate usage for a person of unspecified or neutral gender.

      Guess you missed the 1990s... You must always replace He with He/she/it/that/thing/whatever. Otherwise you'd never hear the end about your "insensitivity to the plight of wymyn and transsexuals."

    4. Re:While we're throwing labels around by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Guess you missed the 1990s... You must always replace He with He/she/it/that/thing/whatever. Otherwise you'd never hear the end about your "insensitivity to the plight of wymyn and transsexuals."

      I went to high school in the 90s and I still use his as a neutral gender. If the womyn/trannies complain, then she can suck it. I'm not going to contort myself to fix someone's messed up self image.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:While we're throwing labels around by codemaster2b · · Score: 1

      Ok, let me clarify. Yes, he is talking about getting what is 100% fair for him to get. Yes he is talking about not getting conned out of his money. And yes, the term "hurting people" is ridiculous, misleading, and deriding. To the original poster, I'm sorry; I didn't mean to be derisive. Now for what I meant. Verizon is out to rob you. Hey, they're no different from any other Cell Phone company. Let's call them evil. So then, does evil justify evil? Does the Golden Rule work in reverse? No, it doesn't. The solution to evil is not being evil. By throwing a fit, you seek to take control of the situation. This control is key, not the method of obtaining it. They will lie, cheat, and steal to keep you under control, I understand this. I have Cingular; it's just the same. I am just saying that throwing a fit - being a problem - is not the right way to fight a control freak. It only makes the future situation worse (if not for you, then for the rest of us). The way you fight a control freak is to pull the rug out from under them. Refuse to play by their rules. Leave. Our society has created the situation we are in. We litigate morality because no one wants to sacrifice and be polite. The result - we shot ourselves in the foot. You can't "walk away" from a cell phone company. You need a phone! Besides, you signed a contract. No, I don't have answers. But then, I'm young and idealogical, and I believe that they exist. I am peaceful by nature, and hate dealing with those people.

      --
      And over there we have the labyrinth guards. One always lies, one always tells the truth, and one stabs people who ask t
    6. Re:While we're throwing labels around by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I hear you. I'm not gonna throw away the things I learned just because some person has found some infantile way to be offended by it.

  15. Overlap by RomulusNR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most GSM phones can handle two calls at once (a la call waiting/etc.), so overlapping times doesn't prove cloning.

    The only theoretical way I am aware of to clone a GSM phone is to copy the SIM or have a SIM with the same subscriber number.

    A simple fix would be to get a new SIM card. You can get your existing number transferred over to the new card. If its a card clone, then a new card will solve the problem.

    Dunno why the customer service kept hanging up on you (was it really a hangup or a dropped call?), considering they supposedly have the best customer service in the business.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    1. Re:Overlap by flatulus · · Score: 1

      You can't clone a SIM card. You can come *close* - but you won't be able to copy the Ki (secret key) that is used to authenticate your phone to the GSM network. The Ki file in the SIM is writable (by a person with the administrative password, but not readable -- by ANYONE, including the person who wrote it. The only "reading" of it is done during authentication, when the embedded processor in the SIM (which *can* read it) uses the Ki to calculate a cryptographic hash which it sends to the GSM network. (it's a standard challenge/response type of authentication).

      And before you ask, if someone got hold of your SIM and wrote a new Ki value (so that they could make a complete clone of your SIM, given that they know what Ki value they wrote into YOUR SIM), then the network would reject both phones, because the network has a copy of the Ki which was originally in your SIM. Since the perp changed your Ki in order to clone, your phone will no longer be accepted on the network. In other words, a dead giveaway that your SIM was not cloned....

    2. Re:Overlap by tispo · · Score: 1

      I don't quite see the overlap problem:

      > 2/22 at 3:28 pm "NBR unavailable" 17mins usage.
      > 2/22 at 3:44 pm "-(# I made)---" 3mins usage.
      > So if you add up the time 3:28pm + 17 mins = 3:45 pm

      Most carriers charge full minutes, so 17 minutes of usage may very well be just 16 minutes and 1 second. In that case, the first call ended at 3:44, and another call can easily be made starting at 3:44.

  16. I am a fag, fag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez. I thought that was obvious from my post.

    I just don't understand why he (and it is a he, trust me) insists on using "partner" instead of just calling a spade and spade.

    1. Re:I am a fag, fag. by Phillup · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I just don't understand why he (and it is a he, trust me) insists on using "partner" instead of just calling a spade and spade.

      Because he lives in a repressed society that doesn't allow him to call his partner his husband?

      It is quite appropriate that some people claim their morals come from words engraved in stone.

      Kinda like their stone age thinking...

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    2. Re:I am a fag, fag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, 'cause the 10 Commandments directly address gay marriage. Ignorance prevails on both sides of the issue.

    3. Re:I am a fag, fag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Partner != Husband.

    4. Re:I am a fag, fag. by I_am_the_man · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Because he lives in a repressed society that doesn't allow him to call his partner his husband?

      How about calling his "partner" his "boyfriend". My guess is that if he did that then people would surely think he was a woman. I think there is a reason to use the word "partner" in a semi-anonymous, print (of otherwise non-vocal) forum. But perhaps we are overthinking this. We are certainly off topic.

    5. Re:I am a fag, fag. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Or it's just whoever is also on the family plan. Why would you care who that is?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:I am a fag, fag. by spun · · Score: 1

      You know, I suspected that might be the case, and you just had issue with the use of the word "partner" because hiding what you are makes it seem like that's not okay. But I see so much homophobia here, I thought that you were just closeted and self hating. BTW I only posted as AC originally because this whole thread is off topic, not because I have any fear of my name being associated with anything pro-gay. Anyways, my karma hasn't dipped below "excellent" since they imposed the cap, so I can afford to be modded off-topic.

      Oh, and I'm not actually a fag. I tried. I really gave it a fair shot, and I still wouldn't turn down fooling around with a guy who I liked and respected if he really wanted me (as long as my wife was okay with it, which she probably would be as we have an open marriage and she currently owes me one.) But having tried it I know for sure that guys just don't do it for me like girls do. I have to like and respect a guy, and he has to really want me, to do it with him. I'll do just about any girl who's still breathing.

      That's probably TMI, I know...

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    7. Re:I am a fag, fag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha I knew it was Alex P Keaton. I am proud of you admiting it FAG!!! More power to you. Now stop the lame posts.

    8. Re:I am a fag, fag. by RobertLTux · · Score: 0

      no but did you know that the whole nuking of Sodom was about ...wait for it Massive SODOMY
      and since this would be in genesis and the 10 Cs are in Deuteronomy i think the opinion of HIM is very clear on the subject

      but anyway to move back to the topic at hand try an expirement
      take your sim card and battery and mail it to a friend in another city if during the trip (to friend and back to you) calls are being made you have been cloned (or if you really want to have fun mail them to t-mobiles corp office with a note explaining the situation).

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    9. Re:I am a fag, fag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a fag is like being a murderer or like losing your virginity. once you do it there's no going back. You kill once and you're a murderer for life. Sex only once? No longer a virgin. Were a pincushion for an Abercrombie Model? You're a homo buddy!!!!! lol. For life!!!!!

    10. Re:I am a fag, fag. by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      WRONG

      common mistranslation of the hebrew "to know" - one means sex, the other means, you know, to know what they are doing.

      Oddly enough, the people in the city of Sodom, whcih was under attack, wanted to know what these strangers ("angels") were doing in their city. they did not want to have sex with them. sorry, i know this makes things less convenient for you...

  17. or.... by MagicM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or your partner is cheating on you, did receive those calls, and is lying to you about it.

    (Just saying. It happens all the time.)

    1. Re:or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh that's the first thing I thought when I read this story

    2. Re:or.... by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Whose phone are the calls supposedly being made to? Surely T-mobile indicated whether the calls in question were received by you or your partner.

  18. Contest the Calls by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

    We called up T-mobile twice and claim the possibility of phone cloning. Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something. Any advice to what this could be?

    I suggest you call them and tell them that you did not make the calls in question (contest the calls). It's not your job to figure out what is going on, only to point out that a problem exists. Your mobile provider probably has some internal mechanism designed to investigate and resolve these matters (and the poor saps who usually answer the phone are probably not part of it, so just tell them your symptoms and they'll probably forward the information to the right people).

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  19. Okay.. by thebdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, your 17 minutes example is poor. The call could have ended at 3:44 and still be listed as 17 minutes, remember cell companies traditionally round you up to the nearest minute. If you had more then a possible 1 minute overlap example that would be different. Second, how well do you trust this "partner"? If they would presumably be on the hook for the overages if it was their fault, then they have motivation to lie same goes for if the calls are coming from someone they don't want you to know about...though I do not know what type of relationship you and this "partner" have.

    Next, either go to a B&M location and bitch to someone in person, have bills in hand, or send a letter/e-mail to customer service. The letter and/or e-mail are ignorable, but at least someone should attempt to read it. IF you actually show up at a location you are pretty much non-ignorable. Be sure to express anger, but do not do anything too stupid. IF worse comes to worse, threaten legal action against the location, the employees and T-mobile (always casts wide nets, threatening individuals works because they don't want to lose their money...loyalty to their business is probably minimal.

    So make sure to verify that neither you nor your partner received the calls...then go make a stink in person.

    --
    "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    1. Re:Okay.. by robdavy · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone keep saying to go to a store?

      Having worked for a number of cell phone retailers, there's nothing the store can do.

      Most of the time, the store is just a re-seller/dealer and doesn't know anything about your account or anything.

    2. Re:Okay.. by Proteus · · Score: 1
      threaten legal action against the location, the employees and T-mobile
      Be careful about this advice. In many places, it is illegal to threaten a lawsuit if you have no intention of following through -- in such a place, if T-mobile calls your bluff, you may end up with the expense of suing just to avoid being sued.

      Before threatening legal action anywhere, you should be sure of the relevant laws -- the best way to do that is consult an attorney licensed in your area. Often, you will be advised on whether you'd reasonably have a case at no charge. If no private attorney will do this for you, you can contact a free legal help line or your State's equivalent of the Dept. of Consumer Affairs for assistance.
      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    3. Re:Okay.. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > In many places, it is illegal to threaten a lawsuit if you have no intention of following through

      Just choose your words carefully; try "I'm considering a lawsuit" or "This shit makes me want to call a lawyer" instead of "I'll see your ass in court, jerkwad!" It's very difficult to divine someone's intention unless that intention was followed through.

  20. Re:Partner? by Phillup · · Score: 1

    That, or you don't understand what the word "mostly" means.

    --

    --Phillip

    Can you say BIRTH TAX
  21. Call Waiting by Jhon · · Score: 2, Informative
    So if you add up the time 3:28pm + 17 mins = 3:45 pm. The time when I made my call was at 3:44 pm. This reoccurs several times.
    This can occur if your plan has call waiting or 3 way calling. I speak from the experience of an elder monitoring the cell phone usage of teenagers (who should NEVER EVER EVER have cell phones in my opinion).

    If you've got T-Mobile, the bill should break down WHICH phone is receiving the call (either yours or your partners). If it's happening on your partner's bill, I would suggest it's more likely that your partner is lying to you than the phone was cloned (just statistically speaking -- nothing against your partner).

    Another possibility is that the entry on your bill is "bogus". The result of a computer glitch and you'll need T-Mobiles help to resolve the problem.
    1. Re:Call Waiting by adinu79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One question, I'm not familiar with the American way of billing phone calls. Are your GSM companies also billing the people receiving the calls? In Europe, AFAIK, they are only billing the people making the calls and that's it.

    2. Re:Call Waiting by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      In America, we bill everyone we can for anything. If your phone plan doesn't have something like "free incoming minutes" then yes, both parties are getting billed for the usage.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    3. Re:Call Waiting by adinu79 · · Score: 1

      Holy Shit, no wonder the telecoms are pushing for a tiered internet, it seemed weird for me here, but seeing that this is basically the same way they've been doing business for years, seems pretty clear now why they would want to push this through ... billing both parties of a call seems so ... unreal here. The only time this happens in Europe is in the case of Roaming calls where the caller is billed at the normal rate and the called person pays the rest of the international bill, but otherwise, the one that calls has to shell out the cash.

    4. Re:Call Waiting by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      Yes both sides pay for the call, or better yet the text message.
      So you can see why we are all waiting with baited breath for those wonderful SMS spam messages. If it's anything like my spamtrap email address, I'd owe a couple of hundred dollars a day after my limit get's passed.

    5. Re:Call Waiting by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Both parties don't get billed. The mobile user pays for the mobile usage, it doesn't matter whether he makes the call or recieves it. actual phone-network costs are far lower than the mobile-part costs, so the phone companies generally fold that into the mobile pricing.

      This makes the mobile phone transparent to the caller: they don't get charged more to call a mobile phone than they would to call a regular phone in the same area code as the mobile.

      Which is good for the mobile user: he could, if he so desired, entirely eliminate land-line service without burdening businesses he may have a relationship with.

      There are certain advantages to both systems, but the "caller pays" system is a little rude on the part of the mobile owner. Forcing your friends bills to go up because you chose to use an expensive gadget is a tad selfish don't you think?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Call Waiting by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I get SMS spam already, I have no idea how they got my 10digit@vzw.com SMTP-to-SMS redirect address.

      About 2 or 3 a day...been going on for years. There's nothing I can do about it, so I've been told from Verizon -- I just have to pay for it.

    7. Re:Call Waiting by ceejayoz · · Score: 1
      I get SMS spam already, I have no idea how they got my 10digit@vzw.com SMTP-to-SMS redirect address.
      To: 0000000000@vzw.com, 0000000001@vzw.com, 0000000002@vzw.com, 0000000003@vzw.com ...
      (narrow the first lot down to valid area codes, or even go so far as to find out which number groups that cellphone provider has access to, and you've got a nice big list of SMS addresses)
    8. Re:Call Waiting by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Yes, this was something I found shocking about the Cell Systems in USA, Canada (and even Sri Lanka). You have to pay to recieve a call or a text message (SriLanka doesnt charge to recieve a SMS). At one time there were many online systems where you can send a text for free, it really annoyed our USA friends no end, and we never understood why until we found out they were paying! We suddenly found some respect for our predatory telecoms companies here!

      In Europe, additionally calling a typically costs mobile costs more, whilst in the US and Canada it can be a "local call". So the caller can call for free, and the reciever ends up paying, again an incentive for longer phone calls, with greater costs, and more profits!

      --
      Have a nice day!
    9. Re:Call Waiting by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      I know there is at least one law {47 U.S. Code 227) it is illegal to send advertising to any device capable of translating it to paper - IE fax machines/servers. Unfortunately not even the FCC is sure where SMS stands in this reguard. They feel it's covered under the same ruling, but it's not been tested in court.

    10. Re:Call Waiting by tengwar · · Score: 1
      Not strictly true - we can do it the US way as well if we need to. I work for a mobile telco, and we don't have desk phones. I have a "mobile" number - works as you would expect. I also have a geographical number that rings through to my mobile, and an incoming caller only pays at land-line rates, with my company account picking up the difference. The point is to have something that behaves like a normal PABX but terminates on mobiles rather than fixed extensions (there are other features like hunt groups, out of hours white lists etc which make it a nice system).

      Another more common case is if you are roaming abroad and someone calls you from home - they only pay as if you were in your home country, and you pick up the difference.

    11. Re:Call Waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe, only the party that dials the call gets billed. But this also means that if you call a cell phone from a land line you are going to pay a per minute rate which may be quite high. Ouch.

      In the US, if you call a cell phone in your areacode from a land line, the call is free for you. The cell phone user gets billed.

      In a cell to cell call, yes, it might happen that both parties will be billed. But many networks (T-Mobile, Verizon) do not charge at all for in network calls. This means that evey T-Mobile subscriber can call any other T-Mobile subscriber anywhere in the country and talk as much as they want for free. I am not sure if this exists in Europe. Also, keep in mind that in many if not most plans, evening and wweekend calls are free - to any cell or land line, anywhere in the US.

    12. Re:Call Waiting by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      There are certain advantages to both systems, but the "caller pays" system is a little rude on the part of the mobile owner. Forcing your friends bills to go up because you chose to use an expensive gadget is a tad selfish don't you think?
      yes in caller pays systems having a mobile as your only phone is considered pretty rude unless you can reasonablly justify it to those you are communicate with.

      on the other hand it makes people think twice about calling you when your on the move. I'm in the uk and i have NEVER recived a neusense call on my mobile. Even with the do not call list the family landline gets at least one a week and sometimes a lot more. If you wan't to interrupt me when i'm out you should damn well pay the cost of doing so.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    13. Re:Call Waiting by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Another more common case is if you are roaming abroad and someone calls you from home - they only pay as if you were in your home country, and you pick up the difference.
      while i've never roamed myself the impression i got was the total cost (combined total payed by both caller and callee) was much higher for roaming mobiles than for just getting a prepay sim in the destination country and telling people to call it (or setting your pbx to do so automatically though a voip provider that gives cheap international rates).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Call Waiting by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I'm in the US and I don't get nonsense calls on my cell phone either. In fact, it's one of the reasons I dropped landline service altogether: The call breakdown on my landline was as follows:

      50% bellsouth asking if I wanted to upgrade my service. If i didn't say no in just the right way, i'd have to call and have it reduced back to the minimum again later.

      40% some company claiming to be florida state troopers doing a fundraiser. when asked point blank if the caller in fact was a state trooper, the answer was no

      9% other telemarketers. kept low by my being on the do-not-call list. "charity" above aparantly can call with impunity

      1% wrong numbers

      4 (not a percent. just something like four calls in like 2 years) friends and family. (to be fair i'd anticipated the transition and had been telling everyone to use the cell as primary.)

      On the cell however, no telemarketers (it's not on any do not call list either), even fewer wrong numbers. S/N is very very high. Plus it costs less than then landline was costing me and has free long distance, caller id, voicemail, etc. built right in. I won't say cell companies are saints, but I've NEVER recieved a call from sprint trying to upgrade my service.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Call Waiting by adinu79 · · Score: 1

      Well, in Europe, things are a little different, basically, mobile phones have their own area codes, so when you call a number you know it's a mobile phone and not a Landline, and anyway, at least here, mobile phone penetration is extremely high, almost everyone has a mobile phone nowadays, I rarely use my landline. So, if you want to call a mobile phone, you use your mobile, if you want to call a landline, you use your landline. It's that simple.

  22. Get a better service provider by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Then ask him what zip code these calls were made from, they should be able to figure that out. Verify that it's something reasonable.

    Wife and I were having some problems keeping track of phone calls after our son was born (which is understandable...) We use Verizon, and their website when you log in will list all placed and received calls including numbers, locations, durations. We didn't even have to call a service rep.

  23. The Problem is.... by Grantisimo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem is that t-mobile does not acknowledge that cloning exists on their network. I used to work in T-mobile customer care. We got calls about this at least once a week. Most were just paranoia. The answer was always the same; "It is impossible to clone a SIM." Not much that you can do against that.

  24. Re:Partner? by fruitbane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We can assume he is gay, or...

    We can not bother because it's irrelevant to the question. Ask Slashdot isn't really a forum on sexual choices.

  25. He's cheating on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't look for zebras when all you have are horses, or, always look for the simplest answer.

    It sounds like your boyfriend is cheating on you and is telling his new boyfriend to use number blocking (*67). Then when you ask him about it, he denies everything.

    1. Re:He's cheating on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It sounds like your boyfriend is cheating on you and is telling his new boyfriend to use number blocking (*67). Then when you ask him about it, he denies everything.

      I think you have too many boyfriends in there. Why would her boyfriend have a boyfriend?

    2. Re:He's cheating on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when people say "partner", it oftentimes implies a homosexual relationship.

  26. The AOL thing by jefu · · Score: 1

    Instead of just "Record the dates..." you might also try the "record the call" and post it to the web thing that worked so well against AOL.

    1. Re:The AOL thing by number11 · · Score: 1

      Instead of just "Record the dates..." you might also try the "record the call"

      But check first to make sure that recording the call is legal in your jurisdiction. Local laws vary. In some places, either party can record the call, in some places the consent of both parties is necessary. Some places, you need to announce that the call is being recorded (verbally or with a beeptone). And some places, that recorded message saying "calls may be monitored for quality assurance" can be taken as explicit permission ;->

  27. Sounds to me that it's more likely a billing issue by planetmn · · Score: 1

    Assuming for the moment that everything you state is true, that neither you nor your partner are receiving these calls, to me it seems like a billing error and here's why. Have you ever had a friend call you to tell you that a call they made to your phone number was answered by a strange person? Do you receive many calls from people who are expecting somebody else (particularly the same somebody else) instead?

    If neither of these things happen, than it's pretty unlikely that somebody is using your number for incoming calls.

    -dave

    --
    /., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
  28. Re:Partner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ask Slashdot isn't really a forum on sexual choices.
    I dunno. If you're asking for advice on Slashdot, we pretty much know your sexual preference.
  29. A few things by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a big fan of T-Mobile, one of the only quality mobile networks in the US (even if they're restricted to the crappy 1900MHz band), so I'm disappointed you apparently are getting bad customer service from them.

    I do recommend being careful about how you word it, when you talk about "phone cloning" and stuff then you're getting ahead of yourself. Let's address that first though:

    Phone cloning is possible with GSM, but improbable, someone would be going to great lengths, buying equipment worth thousands of dollars, just to save a few dollars to make outgoing calls (the cloned cell is going to be unusable for incoming calls, after all.) While mobile phone cloning was a great business in the mid-nineties, that was when it was easier (plenty of analog phones, which could be cloned just be reflashing a second phone), and when mobile phones weren't exactly accessable to a sizable portion of the population.

    Today, you can pretty much anonymously buy a prepaid mobile phone from any store, with a wide variety of minimum costs, generally of less than $10 a month from at least two major brands (T-Mobile and Cingular.) There aren't many people who'd want to clone phones, with the risks associated and the costs of doing the cloning to begin with, and the limitations on receiving calls, given the circumstances.

    Your example isn't that convincing either as such circumstances would occur during call waiting or conference calling. I use both regularly, so my bill is full of these things.

    The two most realistic circumstances are that there's a software error on T-Mobile's side, or that you're simply mistaken (possibly in terms of receiving the calls, or possibly in terms of how you're interpreting the bill.) Stop talking in terms of "My phone has been cloned!" and tell them that you and your partner believe these calls to be non-existant. Explain that they appear on your side of the bill, under your number, and you know you didn't receive them. Ask them to investigate.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:A few things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll have no more reasoned discussion like that here, mister!! Did you forget you were on Slashdot?!?

    2. Re:A few things by jimwelch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clonning can still happen. It can be done by employees of a cell phone repair service. Many in the USA are "independents" or one/two man shops. They have the equipment, training, and modivation (profit).

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    3. Re:A few things by mazzanet · · Score: 1
      Phone cloning is possible with GSM, but improbable, someone would be going to great lengths, buying equipment worth thousands of dollars
      Thousands of dollars is an overstatement. All that is needed to clone a SIM card is a standardish smartcard programmer which are readily available in prebuilt or kit form for as little as AU$40. The algorithms encrypting the KI (unique ID of a SIM) can be bruteforced in 10-12 hours on your average consumers PC and can then be programmed into appropriate firmware on blank smartcards (Gold cards commonly). I have done this numerous times myself with little effort, simply a point and click affair (legitimate purposes of course - having multiple telcos on the one SIM card). In this day and age, SIM cloning is definately very feasible and plausable. As mentioned a few times in other comments, a SIM can be cloned by physically having the SIM, data sniffed over the air or simply guessing KIs.
  30. Re:My "partner"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    Yah actually I noticed this issue too.

    A couple of years ago my roomates and I were renting from one of the roomates father. He decided to sell and we decided to make a venture into real estate and bought the place together. So for two years he was my partner? Um domestic partner? well um I guess so :)

    We did live together, and own property together, by our employers definitions we were like a mutual checkbook away from being able to get on the same medical insurance package with domestic partner benefits.

    -Steve

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  31. You get charged for receiving calls? by silasthehobbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh dear God!

    My phone bill would be hundreds of pounds a month - rather than the £15-£20 it normally is - if this happened in the UK. Over here, we get charged for making calls from our mobiles (cell phones), but the person calling my mobile is the one who gets charged for ringing me - I don't get charged for that unless I'm in a different country.

    How come American consumers haven't risen up and complained about this? It seems a bit of a rip off to me.

    --
    silas

    1. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Welcome to 1998!

      Seriously, I know you're not from the US, but this issue has been discussed here and many other places repeatedly.

    2. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      I was about to say the same thing. This looks like a scam to me - kind of like a Joe Job in the spamming world. Someone's out to hurt someone else intentionally. Then again, if the US had a sensible system where you only pay to make calls, this could never happen...

      Bob

    3. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incoming calls don't cost me money, but when I am not careful and send a text message to a 4-digit number I could subscribe myself to continuous incoming text messages that cost me money.

      In fact, some people already had the problem of sudden paid text messages without knowingly subscribing to such a service, and without information on how to unsubscribe.

      The providers, who very well know how to invoice these services, suddenly hide behind bullshit "we do not know" and "we cannot tell" arguments when you try to find out who is behind such scams.

    4. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      Of course if the roles were reversed you'd be saying how silly it was that American landline users have to pay extra to call someone who chooses to use a cellphone.

      Out of curiosity, do you get charged double air time if you call another mobile from your own?

    5. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by sholden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because whether the caller or the callee pays the extra cost for the mobile call is pretty much irrelevant and works out even in the end.

      Why do you have to pay extra for calling someone on their mobile phone instead of on their land line? Seems a bit of a rip off to me.

    6. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly. It always costs the same to call mobiles on your own network (ie Vodafone if you're a Vodafone customer, O2 if you're an O2 customer etc) as it does to call landlines. Most (not all) plans charge you extra for calling a mobile phone on a different network, but it's closer to 1.5x the price rather than double.

    7. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

      Peru is the same way, at least it was in the 90's when I lived there. There was unlimited incoming calls on a cell, and the one calling paid for the call, whether from another cell or a regular landline.

      Same with home phones, there was no such thing as a toll-free call. If you made a call from a land phone, the caller paid for it. If you called another landline, there was a really cheap rate, but calling a cell phone was 3-4x that rate. Made pay phones a bitch, as you had to know what kind of phone your recipient was using.

      --
      "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
    8. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people just don't know any better, I guess.

      I'm an American and I don't pay for incoming calls, but it's not a law or anything.

    9. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Oh my god. I can hardly understand you, with your "pounds" and "mobiles" and "ringing" instead of "dollars" and "cell phones" and "calling". In another couple decades, we won't even be able to understand you! And thank god for that.

      I will say, though, that I have the same question you do. I have asked my cell-phone-using brethren why the hell they don't want to pay less and get more and better service, like the Europeans do. My brethren look at me like I'm stoned, having no idea what I'm complaining about. Is it true that Europeans don't pay for text messages -- which additionally work better than they do in the states?

    10. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that they pay a LOT more... See the AC posting above about 1000 minutes to a mobile in the UK vs US.
      And no, text messages in Europe are most definitely not free. :)

      And the Europeans get the happy joy of paying up to EUR 8.22/min while traveling 400+ miles in any direction (i.e., internationally within the E.U.). I can call from Barrow, Alaska to Puerto Rico at my standard home minute rate. Even if I were roaming, it would only be $.65/min. Add Canada for $20/mo more.

      Cheers!

    11. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by wmelnick · · Score: 1

      Ummm.... Hang on...

      Are you saying that in England you (1) have to pay for calls to people on the same mobile carrier as you and that (2) you pay extra to call a mobile phone?

      OK, maybe it's a bit of bias here, but that seems more ridiculous to me. Here in the US, all incoming and outgoing calls to or from anywhere in the US are free on a landline for a flat fee, and with a cell phone all calls within the US are free, you just pay for your airtime during peak hours (5AM-9PM M-F) unless the call is to someone else on your carrier - then you do not even pay for the airtime.

      Which seems fairer to you?

      W

    12. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by asuffield · · Score: 1

      Of course if the roles were reversed you'd be saying how silly it was that American landline users have to pay extra to call someone who chooses to use a cellphone.

      This is unrelated; it's because in the UK, there is one network responsible for landlines and not cellphones, so every call between a landline and a cellphone is a 'trunk' call (like you have between different carriers in the US). Long-distance calls on landlines here are always within BTs network, so those don't cost as much as calls to cellphones. You get exactly the same thing in the US, it's just that there, you have carriers that do both cellphone and landline networks, and you have multiple landline networks, so it looks different.

      Out of curiosity, do you get charged double air time if you call another mobile from your own?

      No. Calls between cellphones on the same network (or on some other networks, depending on your contract) are often cheaper than landlines. All calls between networks cost roughly the same (except that some of the cell networks have made special deals to reduce the costs between them, but BT are not allowed to do that because they're a monopoly).

    13. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Said it before, will say it again. The way airtime is charged in the US is *great*. It enables you to use any number as as a proxy to the mobile number you happen to be using at the time.

      Yes, there's number portability here too, but the players in it are limited (i.e. cartel).

      Instead, this way the number you give out to friends/business partners can be selected from a much wider pool of providers - including VoIP/POTS gateways - and forwarded to the commodity-crack-whore-telco's network over which you have chosen have your bits shipped this minute.

    14. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by asuffield · · Score: 1

      Is it true that Europeans don't pay for text messages

      No. However, the rates are low, and you don't pay for receiving SMS. You can get contracts where you pay a fixed rate per month for them, too.

    15. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case it's no problem. I'm with Cingular, where you get get n*100 minutes "free". I have no roaming in two states (Illinois and Missouri) and no long distance charges anywhere in North America.

      The only time I ever went over my minutes was when I let my teenaged daughter have a cell phone on my plan. That only happened once, I took her phone away.

      I pay $37.00 per month, taxes, tarriffs etc included. Ask.com says that's 20.6202 UK Pounds. It's also about $15 (8.2481 UK Pounds) to $20 (10.9974 UK Pounds) less than I was paying with a land line, even though both incoming and outgoing calls were "free" (fixed rate per month unlimited useage) on the land line. This didn't include long distance calls, and most people I call are long distance.

      When I first got a cell phone I did chafe about this, until I realized that I was paying a lot less for the cell than for the land line (with long distance my bill often approached $100 per month).

      So in my case I'm not complaining, as I'm paying a lot less than when all my calls were "free" both ways.

      Plus there's the added benefit of when you have some long-winded person call you, you can say "sorry, I'm on minutes, I have to go".

    16. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by whoisjoe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was in a bar once and subscribed to some board advertised on TV. As the night went on, I got pretty well lit. Unfortunately, I forgot to unsubscribe before I went to bed. I woke up the next morning and found, to my shock, that my inbox was full. Added, like, $20 to that month's bill :-(

    17. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you have to pay extra for calling someone on their mobile phone instead of on their land line?
      you are the person who decided the matter was important enough not to wait until the person was back in touch with a landline, the callee on the other hand has little choice but to pick up if its someone they even vaugely recognise (or no caller id). so you should bear the cost of using mobile communication.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      This is unrelated; it's because in the UK, there is one network responsible for landlines and not cellphones, so every call between a landline and a cellphone is a 'trunk' call (like you have between different carriers in the US).
      false: when BT still ran a mobile network calls to thier mobiles from landlines were significantly more expensive than landline to landline (though they were cheaper to other mobile networks). I'm not sure what the situation is post demerger though.

      and i'm pretty sure in the US local calls are always free or cheap and long distance always more regardless of the providers involved at the endpoints.

      Long-distance calls on landlines here are always within BTs network, so those don't cost as much as calls to cellphones.
      ever heared of NTL and TELEWEST? thier lines have perfectly normal geographic numbers and cost no extra to call, the same applies to some VOIP services (some try to saddle you with 0845 or 0870 numbers). btw if you can do the registration from a UK ip you can get a uk geographic number free from www.sipgate.co.uk

      and since deregulation there is a huge industry of alternate backhaul providers even for situations where both ends of the call are bt landlines.

      No. Calls between cellphones on the same network (or on some other networks, depending on your contract) are often cheaper than landlines.
      true calls on the same mobile network are often cheap, landline to landline tends to be cheaper than mobile to mobile though.

      for most mobile phone plans the following inequality holds on the cost of calling:

      same mobile network = landline = other mobile network

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    19. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by julesh · · Score: 1

      The UK system, which allows you to choose what you pay by choosing whether to make calls. Not receiving an incoming call isn't really an option. Holding off on making a call until you can do it from a landline often is.

      Yes, I'm aware that in the end, the average customer pays the same. The point is that it is easier to manage your finances with the UK system.

    20. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by sholden · · Score: 1

      Why should everyone else be hit with higher call charges because that person decides to treat their mobile as their primary phone (or only phone which isn't that uncommon)?
      Why should the caller be tasked with determining if a number is a mobile phone and hence if they can afford to call it?

      I've lived under both systems - caller pays in Australia, and callee pays in the US - as I said it all pans out in the end anyway, but the US system seems more conveniant since I don't care is a number someone gives me is a mobile or not, and I can give people my mobile number without worrying about them having to jump through hoops to call a mobile from their office phone.

    21. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by tricorn · · Score: 1

      So there are people out there who want to talk to you so badly they pay hundreds of pounds a month to do so? Wow!

      Look at it from the other side - if you're trying to get a hold of me, and all you get is my answering machine, don't expect me to call you back if I'm going to have to pay for it.

    22. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      In most European countries mobile numbers are assigned using a dedicated prefix pool, while in the US the numbers are assigned using the existing pool for the area code of purchase. So in the US there isn't a method for a caller to distinguish between landline and cell phone numbers. This may have been the reason to let the receiving end pay for (their?) part of the connection, in the same way as what happens for calls received while roaming.

    23. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Determining if it is a mobile is very easy however - since ~99 (iirc...) ALL mobile phones start 07, so there isnt an issue.

      Caller pays is akin to how the postal system works - it was decided it was fairer for the CALLER (poster) to bare the brunt of making phone calls (sending mail) as the reciever could not make allowances for unexpected items - originally the postman would ask you for money when the letter turned up, which if you couldnt afford it was a real problem. Hence stamps!

  32. Re:Partner? by NoNsense · · Score: 1

    Does it matter? Is it a choice? So, you chose to be how you are?

    Just curious.

    --
    So there.
  33. Fair Credit Billing Act by Kagato · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simple writing a formal letter of dispute under as defined by the Fair Credit Billing Act. Send said letter to the billing dispute address (usually on the back of your statement.) Indicate the calls you do not beleive you made, and the adjustment you beleive you deserve. If T-Mobile does not reply, IN WRITING, to your dispute they automatically lose the right to collect $50 or the disputed fee. Which ever is less. Make sure to send in Payment for the portion you do beleive you owe. I suggest spending the extra couple bucks to get delivery confirmation.

    If they do not comply, file a formal complaint with the FTC and your state AG office.

    1. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

      Although I'm not sure, I doubt if that applies in this instance. The FCBA applies to open-ended credit accounts or accounts that provide for installment payments over an extended period of time. Service providers usually stipulate that payment is expected in full by the date due with finance charges applying to passed due accounts.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    2. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Kagato · · Score: 1

      In what ways is a the billing different from the revolving credit of a store charge account?

      Both required a credit check in order to obtain the credit.
      Both have a limit (You can only charge X dollars on a card account, you can only have X number of phones on your cell account).
      Both allow you to purchase goods and service which must be paid at a later date.
      Both have fees, penalties and finance charges when payments are not received on time.

      If you look at T-Mobiles terms of service they have a written dispute policy that mirrors the FCBA. It's pretty clear they know it applies and have structured their terms around it.

    3. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

      Again, I'm not sure and I'm can see your side of the interpretation. The act applies to creditors defined specifically as those

      who regularly extend, or arrange for the extension of, credit which is payable by agreement in more than four installments or for which the payment of a finance charge is or may be required, whether in connection with loans, sales of property or services, or otherwise

      Suppose I perform a service for you and bill you for said service - payable in full by a specific date. I am not a creditor.

      If you do not pay, I reserve the right to charge a finance charge (I lost the commodity of my time in performing my service for you - I should get compensated for the lost interest in that. If you paid on time, I would be earning interest or reducing debt). However, I am not in the business of regularly extending credit - I require immediate payment in full. Futher, I have no interest in preserving the balance indefinitely (which a creditor might). Things are a little muddled here.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    4. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Kagato · · Score: 1

      But we're not talking about you Bob. We're talking about a company that does a credit check before entering into a long term contract. The quality of your credit determines the number of "lines of service" you may have. Cell phone providers are in the business of extending credit my friend. The way they manage the phone plan is exactly like a tradional "Charge Card" (think standard Amex card.) Any way you slice it, it's not muddy.

    5. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

      Although an interesting data point, the credit check means nothing really. These days, banks do automatic credit checks when you open an account of any kind.

      When I look at my wireless agreement, apart from the legalise one expects from such things, I see little resemblance to my credit card agreements as one might expect if subject to the act. There is no statement minimizing liability, etc.

      Again, it just doesn't seem like the same thing. Do you have citable precedence?

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    6. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Kagato · · Score: 1

      I don't need to search for a citation, you already did it for me in your previous post:

      "who regularly extend, or arrange for the extension of, credit which is payable by agreement in more than four installments or for which the payment of a finance charge is or may be required, whether in connection with loans, sales of property or services, or otherwise"

      Just google T-Mobiles terms and conditions. T-Mobile allows you to purchase goods and services payable at a later dater. If you do not pay with in the period of time they assess a finance charge of 1.5% per month (about 18% APR) or $5, whichever is greater. Reading your own citation, it's very clear the FCBA is extremely broad and would cover this case.

      If you can cite something in the terms that contradicts your first citation, please do so.

    7. Re:Fair Credit Billing Act by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

      We've established the wording, not the interpretation. I was asking if you have personally used or know of a citable instance (ie., precedence) where the FCBA was successfully used in disputing a cellular charge?
       
      Obviously, producing a case where it was not used would be meaningless.
       
      A real case would be helpful - speculation based solely on the interpretation won't get us much further.
       
      With respect to the T-Mobile issue, I would agree those come under the FCBA category - you are using the T-Mobile account as a revolving charge when you purchase goods and services (ringtones, joke-a-day, whatever) billed through your account. I'm wondering about actual minutes billed from a service provider - that seems different. Also, you may be right looking at it from an "all-or-nothing" perspective - either the rules apply completely or not at all - which implies they will apply to everything, regardless of source.
       
      Precedence would be very useful - otherwise, only a court would know for sure.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  34. t-mobile can't hang up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    hate to tell ya, but i used to work in a t-mobile call center, and it is not possible to hang up, they are not using phones to talk to you they are using a computer terminal that has T-mobile's proprietary software on it and well, there IS NOT a hang up button.

    1. Re:t-mobile can't hang up by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight (and I don't believe you, btw)... if I call up and start cursing and screaming and not cooperating, T-Mobile can't do anything about it?

      Sorry pal, I don't buy it.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    2. Re:t-mobile can't hang up by nasch · · Score: 1

      Me either. That would also mean if the customer forgets to hang up after the conversation, the T-Mobile rep would have to just sit there until the phone company terminated the connection. How long does that take? How much money would T-M be paying their employee to sit on their hands?

    3. Re:t-mobile can't hang up by milligi · · Score: 1

      Has either of you guys been dropped while a CS transfers you to another dept or back into the main que? I've always wondered what percentage of those drops are intentional. Perhaps they were in the process of transferring him. If so, to him, I'm sure it would certainly SEEM like he'd been hung up on.

  35. Depends on the provider by everphilski · · Score: 1

    My provider gives free nights and weekends (which is when I primarily use the phone, seeing as I'm gainfully employed) and 500 free minutes during business hours. So it really isn't that bad for ~$35 a month. I've never gone over. My wife, who talks all the time, has only gone over once (and been billed for individual minutes). We've had Verizon for 4 years now...

  36. Similar problem = months in hell by kiscica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a similar problem with AT&T Wireless a long time ago (ca. 1998), when they first introduced their "one-rate" service (no extra charges for long distance or roaming, a major innovation back then). For about three months, every single call I made or received appeared twice on my bill: once listed under the actual time I made or received it, and once listed precisely three hours later. That is, for every 17-minute call at 8:53, say, there'd be a corresponding 17-minute call at 11:53. I immediately recognized that this had to have something to do with the fact that I was using a phone with a New York number in California (three-hour time difference). The net result was close to a thousand dollars in overage charges -- while I was careful to keep all my usage under the 1500 minutes per month included in my plan, I was getting charged for more like 3000 minutes at a ridiculous overage rate of 25 cents a minute.

    The first month the problem showed up I thought it would be a quick fix -- obviously no rational human being could think that I was studiously duplicating every single one of my hundreds of calls exactly three hours apart.

    Silly me.

    I went through eight months of hell trying to get an AT&T representative to acknowledge there was a problem. I must have made at least 100 calls, sent numerous faxes and letters, and spoken to at least 20 different "supervisors" -- they kept "disappearing," forcing me to start telling the story all over again each time I called.

    To a man/woman, they all kept insisting that if the calls appeared on my bill, I had to have made them (since we all know computerized billing systems never have bugs). Until the very end I never got a single one of them to admit that there just MIGHT be a problem if every single one of my hundreds of calls appeared precisely twice, 3 hours apart, on each bill. No, I simply had to have made those calls, there was no other explanation.

    Naturally were flatly unwilling to refund the overage charges which, as I mentioned, reached almost $1000 by the third bill. (I didn't cancel the service because I was dependent on it - it was my only phone line, there was no number portability back then, no other service offered "free" roaming/LD which I needed as a New Yorker stuck in California). They did agree to let me pay only the non-disputed charge until the dispute process was over, but soon started sending me dunning letters anyway.

    The problem stopped happening after the third month, but I spent most of the rest of the year trying to get them to reverse the excess charges. It was hell, no other word for it. It wasn't the prospect of having to pay a thousand dollars that scared and angered me, it was the simple fact that a large and respected (!) company like AT&T obviously had a policy for its customer support people that went "no matter how obvious it is that the customer is right, you must insist that he is wrong." I don't see how any rational person could fail to recognize that what happened was a massive computer billing error, but as I mentioned before, I never got *anyone* to admit it. By the end, my conversations with them were so psychologically draining that I was starting to wonder if it really could be my mistake somehow.

    The very end of the saga -- eight months later - was that I finally managed to talk to a manager who agreed there was a problem, told me that many others had experienced it, and canceled all the excess charges, just like that. So, basically, they'd known all along that there was a problem. and just kept stonewalling in the hopes that I'd break down and pay them.

    That experience marked the end of my innocence about big, respectable business. In a very real sense, I "grew up" over those 8 months.

    1. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Well this story is certainly similar to my own "call dumping" problem I had with AT&T while living in New Jersey around the same time.

      Suddenly, unexplained calls to some military base started showing up on my phone bill. I don't now, nor have I ever known, anybody at a military base so I had no idea where these calls were coming from. AT&T of course accused me of making the calls, someone else making the calls on my line, someone was tapping into my phone line, anything but what was really happening; AT&T was dumping unchargeable calls onto my account in the hopes that I wouldn't notice and pay the bill anyway. It all came out in the news several months later that this was in fact what was going on and many people were affected the same way I was.

      I no longer do any business whatsoever with AT&T and so long as I have a choice, I never will either.

      Then there was the time Earthlink took $120 from my bank account after the DSL installation was cancelled two months before the scheduled date, then took six months and the threat of a lawsuit to return the money.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    2. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
      I had a similar problem with AT&T Wireless a long time ago (ca. 1998), when they first introduced their "one-rate" service (no extra charges for long distance or roaming, a major innovation back then).


      Nitpick: that wasn't new in 1998, either. Sprint had that at least as early as 1996, when I signed up with them.

      The very end of the saga -- eight months later - was that I finally managed to talk to a manager who agreed there was a problem, told me that many others had experienced it, and canceled all the excess charges, just like that. So, basically, they'd known all along that there was a problem. and just kept stonewalling in the hopes that I'd break down and pay them.


      Sure. Because there is a very large contingent of the population who will not dispute the bill. Heck, there's a bunch who won't even read it. (No, I'm not making this up, people really are this stupid.) They just open up their mail and say "Doh! AT&T says I owe them $1000! Guess I'll just have to pay it!"

    3. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      AT&T Wireless headquarters was in Redmond.

      Coincidence?

    4. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by YoungHack · · Score: 1

      In my experience with AT&T, stonewalling is one of their ulimate corporate strengths. Luckily when they were in the wrong on my bill it was only for $10 and I had more resolve than even they did (and naturally they finally caved--not worth the price of collecting). They were so bad that I filed an informal complaint against them with the FCC for puting fraudulent charges on my bill.

      Some months later I got the resolution to that. They effectively accused me of trying to defraud them. Stalemate I guess.

      I like to remember that telephone companies rip off old people just as often as young people like me. I feel it something of my responsibility to fight over fraudulent charges. I want to make sure that kind of deceipt is as non-lucrative as possible.

    5. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by kiscica · · Score: 1

      Nitpick: that wasn't new in 1998, either. Sprint had that at least as early as 1996, when I signed up with them.

      True, but AT&T had something Sprint PCS couldn't match then: free roaming meant free roaming, anywhere you went, whether you were using AT&T's own towers or not. As I recall, with Sprint PCS (back then) either you were in range of their CDMA signal, which was widely available in major metropolitan areas but not out in the boonies, or you were simply out of luck. With AT&T, if you weren't in range of an AT&T signal, you'd roam onto another carrier's TDMA signal, or if that failed, onto plain old AMPS (analog 800MHz). AT&T charged you one rate regardless. That's the way it worked in theory, at least - in practice, there were sometimes problems (most memorably, your calls on off-carrier systems would often be billed months late, so if you travelled a lot one month you might find yourself using far below your minutes allotment that month, and then get a giant bill as you went way over your allotment several cycles later -- this didn't happen to me on a large scale as the majority of my usage was still on AT&T's systems).

      I used to travel a lot to places like Montana and Colorado that didn't have any digital cellular service, so Sprint wouldn't have cut it for me. My AT&T phone just worked, almost everywhere. Actually, apart from the unbelievably torturous experience I described above, I was quite happy with the actual AT&T phone service (I know, I know: "aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?"). I was living in California and my fiancée was in New York. We talked about 30-60 minutes a day; that amounted to 1500 minutes a month, which cost $150 on AT&T. At the time, long distance on a land-line was 10 cents a minute, so AT&T's service was a great deal -- I didn't bother with a land-line. I was totally dependent on that phone, which is why I didn't just cancel when they started misbilling me.

      My wife and I have Cingular now (which was once Pacific Bell Mobile Services -- the first wireless service I ever had, back in 96 or so). We're moderately happy with them. Call quality seems much worse than I remember back in the AT&T days, and dropped calls are more frequent, although part of that might be that my wife's phone seems to be kind of flaky. I use my EDGE data connection all the time -- it's a bargain at $20 a month for unlimited use. But more à propos to the current topic, their customer service doesn't suck. We've had one major problem -- we got a phone under our family plan for my mother-in-law, and each month we'd have $20 or $30 in mysterious extra charges on that line attributed to things like "flycell" and "jamster" and, I forget what else. Turned out they were for ring-tone and wallpaper and game downloads which, of course, my mother-in-law had nothing to do with. Apparently, the previous owner of that phone number had signed up for all sorts of third-party services which bill the customer through the phone bill. Over the course of several months, Cingular couldn't do anything about it -- they kept promising to set a flag on the line that would prevent third-party billing from going through, but never managed to fix it. In the end, we canceled the line (with no early-termination penalty), partly because of the problem, and partly because my mother-in-law dropped her phone into the toilet by accident :-)

      The point I'm making is that I do not hate Cingular with a raging, burning hatred, the way I hate AT&T (whose wireless division is, granted, now a part of Cingular). In fact, I feel rather postive towards them. Why? Even though they couldn't fix the billing problem and I had to call their customer service line at least 6 or 7 times for the same problem, they were always kind, courteous, and helpful on the phone. They readily admitted that there was a problem (no "if the computer says you

    6. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by taustin · · Score: 1

      I recall AT&T Wireless. They moved their payment center from LA to somewhere in Arizona. And didn't update their billing computer to print the new address on the payment coupon. For so long the forwarding address expired, and I got a payment returned as undeliverable.

      Fortunately, in California, the Public Utilities Comission actually does their job, and a couple days after the complaint, I got a credit for three months service.

      A&T Wireless got borged because they were too stupid to remember how to breath.

    7. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by oclawgeek · · Score: 1

      Why did you wait 8 months to resolve it with scores of "managers." Part of the problem with these never-ending issues are that customers rarely know their rights, rarely know how to sufficiently document their complaints, and rarely know what else to do, other than to throw tantrums at the sales outlet. First, making threatening telephone calls and disturbing the peace at a sales outlet, no matter what your justification might be, is probably a crime where you live. You don't have the right to do it. And, if you do that sort of thing, you're nothing more than an asshole who makes his|her ignorance the problem of some innocent party. What did the poor sales person or rep you're abusing do to you? Instead of being a jerk, use the system we have in place to deal with disputes in a peacable, fair way. It's called the court. That's what you pay taxes for, so you don't have to commit crimes to get satisfaction when you've been wronged or plagued by someone else's negligence. This is the process I successfully used to get $1,000.00 back from MCI for a billing error: Start with your phone call. Be polite. Stick to facts. If you have a foundation for your theory, tell them that. E.g., "I think it might be cloned because here's a call from San Francisco, and three minutes later, I'm supposedly making a call from New York." Get the rep's first name and an extension, or employee i.d., or something so this person can later be identified. Write this down with your pen and paper, or type it out while you are talking Write their response down. If this doesn't resolve the problem, ask to talk to a "manager or anyone who has authority to deal with this issue." Document the time you spend with this person, e.g., 12 minutes. When you get the "manager" repeat your brief facts and the basis for any reasonable conclusions you've drawn. Write down their response. Suggest a reasonable resolution you can live with. A "reasonable resolution" is not a lifetime of free service. It's something rationally related to resolving your problem so you're not holding the bag on costs. If a problem cost you a hundred dollars and 12 minutes of time on calls, ask for a hundred dollars credit and 12 minutes of free airtime, etc. Write down your offer and their response. If that doesn't resolve the problem, stop escalating it at that point. Politely thank the manager for his/her time, and ask them if they can provide you with an address so you can send a letter. If they refuse, document that. If they provide an address, write it down. Now look at your bill for a customer service mailing address, or check the web. Save the bill with the address and/or print out the website. If you can't find an appropriate address, check with your local Secretary of State website and look up the address and name for their registered agent for service of process. Print and save that. Now compose your letter. Address it to all of the following: the address provided by the CS manager, if any; the customer service address from your bill or web, if any; and the registered agent for service of process. (Pick one address as the main address, and just cc to the others). As you write your letter, remember that you intend to show this letter to a judge if necessary, and write accordingly. Proof-read and revise as necessary so you don't look like an idiot if this goes to court. Open the letter with a brief explanation of your problem. Tell them you are disputing the billing for the charges, and enclose copies of the bills (if you don't have them, go to the web, or have customer service mail you copies). Hilight the charges to make it easy for them to help you. Now tell them that you first informed (name of CS rep and extension or id) at (time, date) of this exact problem. Briefly state his response and that you found it to be unsatisfactory. Now tell them you spoke to a manager. Do the same i.d. routine, and basically repeat that you told him/her the problem and that they could not satisfactorily resolve it. Tell them

      --
      News Flash: Godzilla hates infrastructure.
    8. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by kiscica · · Score: 1

      Why did you wait 8 months to resolve it with scores of "managers."

      Why, because that's the only option they offered me. They weren't exactly forthcoming with avenues of higher appeal. They had a very specific dispute resolution process, which consisted, basically, of the following:

      (01) calling the main support number (the only one they would every give you, on pain of death),
      (02) waiting on hold for half an hour,
      (03) getting a first-line support person,
      (04) asking to speak to the manager you talked to last time,
      (05) being told that no such person existed,
      (06) asking to speak to any manager,
      (07) being told that you would have to go through the whole process with the first-line person first,
      (08) asking the first-line person to please review your extensive call record so you wouldn't have to recap the whole painful story for the fiftieth time,
      (09) being told that she could not find any record of your past 49 calls,
      (10) recapping the whole painful story for the fiftieth time,
      (11) being told, for the fiftieth time, that the computer doesn't make mistakes so you must pay the $1000 in excess charges,
      (12) asking to speak to a manager since the first-line person can't resolve your dispute,
      (13) waiting on hold for a manager,
      (14) asking the manager to please review your extensive call record, etc., etc.,
      (15) recapping the whole painful story for the fifty-first time,
      (16) being told, for the fifty-first time, that the computer doesn't make mistakes etc. etc.,
      (17) repeatedly insisting that there was indeed a problem,
      (18) finally being told that you would have to call back again tomorrow and ask for (manager's name),
      (19) pleading for a direct number that you could use to avoid steps (1)-(13) next time,
      (20) being told that no such number existed,
      (21) going back to (01)

      In my case this routine was varied, occasionally, by sending in voluminous faxes or registered letters in which every single disputed call (i.e. hundreds, because of the nature of the problem I was experiencing) had to be individually listed. There would either be no response to these missives, or else several weeks would pass and I would be told that there was no evidence that any of the calls were in error.

      First, making threatening telephone calls and disturbing the peace at a sales outlet, no matter what your justification might be, is probably a crime where you live. You don't have the right to do it. And, if you do that sort of thing, you're nothing more than an asshole who makes his|her ignorance the problem of some innocent party. What did the poor sales person or rep you're abusing do to you? Instead of being a jerk, use the system we have in place to deal with disputes in a peacable, fair way.

      What on earth makes you think that I ever made "threatening telephone calls" (or "disturb[ed] the peace at a sales outlet", for that matter -- not that AT&TWS even had a sales outlet where I lived then). I endeavoured to remain extremely calm with them at all times. The only "threat" that was ever heard during a phone conversation between me and AT&T was on their part, when one of their representatives told me I had better pay the disputed $1000 (and then keep trying to get it back from them -- heh, heh, heh) or AT&T would, in his words, "destroy my credit record."

      I wonder sometimes if I would have had more success if I had lost my temper at some point. Instead, I just tried to behave reasonably in the face of such inconceivable obstinacy that I still can't quite believe it. My stomach still churns when I think about AT that's how much mental anguish the experience caused me.

      Using the courts probably would have been a good idea, but I guess I just had an inherent bias against getting tangled up with legal action. I've never sued anyone, or been sued, even in small-claims court, in my life. I know it's not that big a deal and probably wo

    10. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      There's another option that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere in this thread that has served me well more than once: If you get jerked around by the grunts in the trenches, go straight to the top. Find out the CEO's mailing address and send a polite, detailed letter describing the problem from your point of view. Obviously, the CEO won't deal with it directly, but when a letter gets forwarded from his office to whichever VP is in charge of customer relations, you're far more likely to see a positive outcome.

      Does it work? Well, I got a brand new replacement 25 h.p. outboard motor for free once. :)

    11. Re:Similar problem = months in hell by oclawgeek · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I gave offense. I didn't mean that you'd ever done anything wrong. Just that some people had previously suggested doing the wrong thing. I should have been more specific.

      Still, regardless of the company's dispute resolution "process" you have the right to bail out and seek other recourse if their system is too cumbersome. Based on what you've seen, it's fair to say at least some companies provide a process designed to force you to capitulate. That's what the courts are for - effective problem resolution when reasonable discourse fails.

      No one likes litigation. That's why I suggest making a few reasonable attempts to resolve the issue informally. But it beats months in customer service hell. The system was provided, because the messy alternative (beating the AT&T CEO like a rented mule) isn't socially acceptable or economically efficient. Small claims is great because (a) no lawyers, and (b) it's cheap.

      If you do ever have to use the court system to address a wrong, remember that you can be polite, yet firm, in your dealings with the opposing side. In fact, rude or unreasonable behavior makes judges feel like the offending party is wasting their time. And if you've seen the lines at the court... the judge most likely stand for it. Just make sure you're in the right before you pull the trigger on your small claims action.

      --
      News Flash: Godzilla hates infrastructure.
  37. Your partner is cheating onyou by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Am I the only one who thought of this?

    1. Re:Your partner is cheating onyou by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1

      No. it was mentioned here (in a VERY trollish attacking comment), here, and here. Just letting you know ;)

    2. Re:Your partner is cheating onyou by fribhey · · Score: 0

      no, you're just the only one who hasn't read the other comments :)

      --
      / http://suffocate.us
      / http://johngrayson.com
  38. 2bepissedoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's better to be pissed off than pissed on!

    1. Re:2bepissedoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily in his community.

  39. Re:Partner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, he's "Mostly" gay. :D

  40. Speak to tech support by crashbumper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work in the cell phone business, and here is an easy way to have them check for cloning. Speak with technical support, and have them check which towers you are pulling service from when these calls occur. If you make a call at 3:28pm connected to a tower in Los Angeles, and then 15 minutes later it says you are connected to a tower in San Diego; that is proof enough something weird is happening. Just highlight all these questionable calls on your bill, then ask to have the calls just before and jjust after checked to see which towers are in use.

  41. Depends on where you live by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The BBB is a national organization but their local operations have a bizarre amount of autonomy.

    I got a settlement from a car dealer after just a couple of phone calls after contacting my own local BBB branch. Some of them do work like they're supposed to.

    1. Re:Depends on where you live by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Some of them do work like they're supposed to.

      However, the system is set up to discourage that. All BBB funding comes from 'member' businesses. So they have a strong incentive to 'resolve' complaints against dues-paying members (and also to use complaints against non-members as a way to shake them down for membership).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  42. contact your local news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does your local news have an investigational reporter? mine does. he calls his show "i'm telling ken". ken is this big black guy who gets down to business. if someone is screwing you over, he'll go to the business and make things right. plus you could be on tv.

  43. Phone Logs? by InfinityWpi · · Score: 1

    Does your phone keep a record of the last X days/weeks worth of calls? I've got my Treo set to keep it's phone log for the last three-four months, and it records everything... calls made, recieved, and missed. Perhaps presenting them with a copy of your log from each phone (Might be difficult, as I don't know of an easy way to export it) would help your case.

  44. I had issues with T-Mobile... by mosch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had some problems where they sold me a phone with a $100 rebate that didn't exist in their system.

    I got resolution by:
    a) Writing a letter to the president of customer service (Sorry, I don't seem to have the name and address on this computer.)
    b) Complaining to the BBB

    They wound up crediting my account with the $100 rebate twice, once for each method of complaint. I didn't stop them, because I figured it was just compensation for the absurd amount of time it took to get it all sorted.

    I got better efforts out of customer service by walking into a local T-Mobile store, where I'd purchased the phone, and asking the sales representatives to assist me with my issue, but those efforts got no results.

    1. Re:I had issues with T-Mobile... by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      In 2004, T-Mobile refused to give me a $100 rebate, too. After spending about 5 hours (spread out over several days) yelling at their CSRs, I finally got hold of someone who credited my account for the $100. Twenty-four hours after my one-year committment was complete, I switched to a different provider.

  45. Is SIM cloning possible for usual folk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this material about SIM card cloning is true, then how would it be possible to clone the card? Unless of course the person who did it is either a T-Mobile employee or somebody who has illegally obtained the card's transport key?

  46. Well, It's Morning in America" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You're a human being. But more importantly, you're a paying customer."

    And my wife wonders why I expect another revolution...

  47. Re:My "partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was your "partner's" name Adam?

  48. Public Service Commission has no power vs Tmobile. by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    Disputing the individual calls is the precisely correct thing to do. I'd start with that: call customer service and tell them you want to dispute some of the charges and list all the calls that you're disputing. Tell them that you did not receive those calls and neither did your partner and you want them removed from your bill. That's the correct method to start with. If the problem recurs, further complaint will be necessary, and then demand that they find out why this is happening and prevent it from happening again.

    Calling the state's public service commission would be completely useless. States do not regulate cellular carriers. Tmobile would laugh and go about their business. At best you might be able to call the state attorney general and claim billing fraud if tmobile refuses to correct the problem, but even then the state may refuse to get involved on the basis of it being a national company.

    You could also complain to the postal service police (the postal service has three police departments of its own) on the basis that they're billing you through the mail, which makes it mail fraud if the bill is fraudulent. But I'd make that a last resort.

    Tmobile *does* have a special office for dealing with people who are thinking about leaving Tmobile. You could call their customer service number and tell them you're thinking about changing carriers because of their billing error and see if they transfer you to the special office. (They're pretty blunt about the fact that they're transferring you to a person whose job it is to try to mollify you.) That person might not be such an ass to you.

    Also, you could go to your local Tmobile store. Find one that's corporate owned, not a franchise. (You can call customer service and ask, they can tell you which one(s) are corporate owned.) The store will have trained tmobile people in it, and they're a lot better about solving problems than the customer service number. I've had problems that the customer service number just flatly refused to fix (like, my voice mail just didn't work at all) and insisted wasn't broken, then I walked into the store and when they didn't get satisfaction out of customer service right away they used their special numbers to call technicians directly and make it happen. That's one example, but I've had several incidents, so I strongly recommend actually going in versus calling if that's feasible to you.

    All of this politely assumes that your partner isn't receiving the calls. You could try calling tmobile and seeing if they can identify which phone they claim is receiving the calls. The example you give in which two calls supposedly overlap is meaningless unless they're claiming it was with the same phone. Even then, that can actually happen with only one line if you receive a call, then get bleeped by call waiting and talk to the new person for a minute before the first person disconnects. You really need to find an example on the bill where there are three calls going on for one line simultaneously, because I think unless you've asked for it Tmobile doesn't enable conference calling, or your phone interface may not make it possible. Again, you could ask about that.

  49. Sad, but true by blueZ3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's very annoying, but it seems like the only way to get problems resolved anymore is to act like a jerk.

    I've had a couple of experiences where being reasonable and polite got me nowhere with customer service, but when I got frustrated at the end of the conversation (after being told several times "there's nothing we can do") and basically gave them and their manager hell over the problem, it got resolved ("OK sir, we'll send out a replacement right away").

    The most frustrating thing about this (to me) is that I don't want to have to be an ass to get a problem fixed. In fact, I go out of my way to do business with companies that fix the problem the first time when I come and politely ask for assistance. I don't recall this being the case in my younger years, but that may be more a result of my memory than an actual decline in customer service.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Sad, but true by Negadecimal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's very annoying, but it seems like the only way to get problems resolved anymore is to act like a jerk.

      Problem is, the bad customer service epidemic is now conditioning people to pull the "jerk" card before they really need to.

      For example, my company prides itself in customer service, to the extent that we have never not replaced a broken product, even when well outside of our posted warranty period. Nonetheless, we get daily calls where people begin rudely insisting that they're going to get what they want... and before our reps have a chance to tell them that they will. I honestly don't blame the customers... it's just a sad statement about our service culture.

    2. Re:Sad, but true by hetfield · · Score: 1

      I'm a mostly non-confrontational person. I feel weird telling a cashier that he/she mistakenly gave me some non-US currency as change, and I try to be polite as possible when calling someone for support since its a large part of what I do for a living. I'm also fortunate enough that I haven't had many issues that I've had to escalate, but I remember one several years ago where I had to do exactly this sort of thing. I bought a ginormous multimedia center to store CDs and DVDs. I could barely fit the box in my car. When I was trying to assemble it at home I found two pieces were missing; critical enough that the unit couldn't be used without them. I drove back to the store with the instructions and receipt to ask for these parts, and I was directed to the store manager. She explained that she would have to open up another box to get the parts and she wasn't willing to do that. So, in front of a store full of people on a Friday night I gradually kept raising my voice, saying I didn't care if she had to turn this store upside down to get the parts that I paid for, until every person in the store was staring at us. I got my parts, made sure to let everyone in the store know I was never shopping there again, and walked out with a big grin on my face, completely shocked at myself. But damn if that didn't feel good!

    3. Re:Sad, but true by Braf · · Score: 1

      Or, you could have called the 800 number on the box and the company that produced the entertainment system would send you the missing or broken parts without any hassle or raising of voices.

    4. Re:Sad, but true by vondo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you buy something in a store, it is the store's resonsibility to make sure you get what you paid for when you walk out of the store. He should not have to wait one day, let alone 4-6 weeks to get all the right parts. The store can call the 800 number to get the parts and replace them in the box they just opened.

    5. Re:Sad, but true by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      Sure. Wait time: 30 - 90 days.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    6. Re:Sad, but true by demigod · · Score: 1
      I don't recall this being the case in my younger years, but that may be more a result of my memory than an actual decline in customer service.

      It's getting worse. See if you local library has a copy of Why nothing works for an explanation of why that is so. It's a little old, but seems explain things nicely.

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
  50. I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fact that this guy/gal is saying the T-Mobile reps hung up is what makes me skeptical of this whole story.

    I know you almost never hear a statement like this about any company -- which is why I'm going to come out and say it -- but I've actually been nothing but satisfied with the customer service at T-Mobile. I've had to call numerous times, for various reasons, and the rep on the phone has invariably been extremely courteous.

    I think I can count one occasion where the person I spoke to didn't really seem to understand what was going on and I ended the call without getting much satisfaction. I called back later with the same problem, spoke to someone else, and got the problem resolved. All the other times I was escalated to the level of support that could help me with my problem with no fuss, quickly and politely. I've even been handed off for second-level support to RIM for my Blackberry when it was necessary; nobody even gave me the slightest hard time. And they always, always thank me for my business -- sometimes the dumb little things count.

    Another time I noticed an instant messaging charge on my bill that seemed out of place (I get unlimited SMS). Instead of getting mad, I just wrote up a quick e-mail on their Web site stating plainly that I thought the charge was erroneous and I'd like it reversed (please). A few days later I got an e-mail back saying, sure enough, they decided it was a mistaken charge, were reversing it, and were giving me 20 free anytime minutes also. No problem.

    So I'm extremely skeptical about this whole story. T-Mobile hasn't been winning J.D. Power customer support awards for nothing. For two different reps to actually hang up on somebody tells me that either A.) somebody called up, screaming and yelling irrationally and refusing to take any kind of due process to address the issue; or B.) somebody's making up a story for some reason.

    (Of course, it could be possible that the submitter is talking about T-Mobile in Europe, which I can't speak to.)

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I dunno. I've gotten excellent customer service from t-mobile in the UK but any time I've interacted with their people in the US I've wanted to strangle someone afterwards.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by WedgeTalon · · Score: 1

      As someone who has worked in the customer service field for years (and for many different companies), I agree. None of the companies I worked for allowed us to hang up on a customer except under very specific circumstances, the universal one being if the customer was directly abusive to me (the CSR). Of course, not all will operate on the same policies (point-in-case: AOL), but for this to happen in this situation sounds very odd.

    3. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by HuckleCom · · Score: 0
    4. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had very bad experiences with T-Mobile. Last week I called to INQUIRE about their prepaid plan, and a couple days later, I found they had switched me over to it without my permission. After three calls, I managed to get them to switch back to my old plan. However, my mobile email no longer works, and the CSR I spoke to told me I never had mobile email for the past 2 years. She actually claimed I had imagined sending and receiving all those emails from my phone. Another CSR believed me, and claimed he could fix the problem, but he was unable to.

      So... after 5 years with T-Mobile, I am ditching them due to the morons I spoke to. The only other GSM game in town seems to be Cingular. They have mobile email, but it's only MSN, Yahoo, AOL, etc.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    5. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not get a phone with a POP3/IMAP client?

      Or a Blackberry or Pocket PC with push mail?

    6. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Kesh · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I work for another cell company, and we are only allowed to hang up on a customer if:

      1) the customer becomes abusive (swearing, insults, threats, etc.)
      2) there is a connection problem (dead air, the customer can't hear us, too much static to make out the conversation, etc.)
      3) the call becomes 'unproductive' ("No sir, we do not give refunds for ringtones." "I want a refund." "No sir, we do not give refunds for ringdones." "I want my refund now!" etc.)

      I would guess T-Mobile has a similar policy.

    7. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, I do believe that nearly any phone/provider you may choose will have the option of setting up a pop3 or imap email account on the phone. There's probably even some way to email the phone directly using the phone#@mobile.tmobile.com or some variant of that. I know there used to be on mine, but I never bothered with it.

    8. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by magictiger · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if someone calls in asking how to place a call to the moon, a representative is "required" to provide assurance that they can assist you. This isn't just with T-Mobile either. It gets reps into retarded situations where they say they can help you, then it ends up being something crazy with your phone and you have to bring it to a retail location or send it in for repair.

    9. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      The fact that this guy/gal is saying the T-Mobile reps hung up is what makes me skeptical of this whole story.

      I don't doubt it for a second. I, too, am a T-Mobile customer. They have been trained, evidently, that the computer is always right and the customer is always wrong. Period.

      I was in Australia for a week. One day during that week, according to T-Mobile, I was the recipient of 75 calls. Each call was unanswered but charged a full minute at the going overseas rate. Since the call was unanswered, it was forwarded to my voice mail back in the US, also one minute, and also at the going overseas rate. That was about $2 per minute, about $300 total.

      My phone did not ring once. This was not a case of just missing the vibration. During the time these calls were made, my phone was on the charger, and my phone ignores silent settings and just rings anyway when on charger. It did not ring once. Nor did I get a "75 missed calls" message on the phone, nor did I get 75 voice mails.

      T-Mobile told me 1) Telstra's computer says the calls were made, they were made, and 2) if I wanted to avoid this in the future, shut my phone off. Even though the "service agent" almost broke down once and almost admitted that something was obviously wrong, T-Mobile policy was that I was responsible for paying for the calls I never got. After a VERY LONG time discussing this with them, they finally issued a "courtesy" refund of the charges. They were admitting no error, and this was a "one time" deal. They finally realized that by keeping me as a customer they would make much more than the $300 they would have gotten as a final payment at account closing.

      Over the years, T-Mobile's service has gone from bad to good to bad to good several times. If they are "JD Powers" winners of anything, then that says more about JD Powers being meaningless than about T-Mobile being good.

      The only advice I have for the OP is to forward the issue to your state's PUC and Attorney General. And tell T-Mobile that you are doing that.

    10. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've had a lot of problems with T-Mobile as well. A few minor billing issues and many problems with dropped calls. Contacting customer service is useless. I found it difficult to believe it was my phone as my wife's phone did the same thing. Each phone is a different brand. Then I was told it was my area. The same problem happens to me on the other side of the state. In both cases college towns (ann arbor mi and kalamazoo mi). I guess the next question is who doesn't suck? I've talked to people with centenial and they are out. I wont' use cingular since AT&T owns them. (bad dsl and landline issues) Verizon has dicked me over with VOIP so I'm not about to use them again. How's sprint?

    11. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      T-Mobile policy was that I was responsible for paying for the calls I never got. After a VERY LONG time discussing this with them, they finally issued a "courtesy" refund of the charges. They were admitting no error, and this was a "one time" deal. They finally realized that by keeping me as a customer they would make much more than the $300 they would have gotten as a final payment at account closing.

      So they didn't hang up on you, I guess?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry. I had nothing but shit service from t-mobile. I had incorrect charges on my bill and they flat out called me a liar. I work phone support myself so I assure you I was extremely polite, and really just wanted them to refund the erroneous charge. they had a $150 call I never placed on my bill. I only used the phone for emergencies, and there were exactly 2 numbers I dialed on that phone.
      I still owe them this money. when I refused to pay for 3 months my account was cancelled and I incurred a $250 early cancellation fee. (I was still paying my bill, just not their fraudulent charge of $150)

      I don't use banks, or credit cards so I had nobody to help me with this bill but t-mobile. and they were extremely unhelpful, even rude.

      So while it's great you got great support, I did not, and no level of management was willing to help me. I've actually had better luck getting the fees reduced with the collection agency that bought the bill than I did with t-mobile. If I hold out another 2 years I should be able to pay it off for under 100 bucks. that's 100 bucks I shouldn't have to pay, but will have to in order to ever get any kind of loans in the future. I'm sure as hell not giving them $400.

    13. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work for a company (now out of business) which was doing outsourced call center work for T-Mobile, and we almost exclusively received calls from New York and other cities which generated a large percentage of inbound calls. T-Mobile dropped them because of the horrible service this company was providing. There is the possibility that T-Mobile has started to outsource a percentage or a larger percentage of their inbound calls again, and we all know how that goes. None of the CSR's I worked with cared about the customer and would regularly hang up on callers if it wasn't a routine call, i.e. an inquiry about the number of minutes left or to add options to their account.

      I'm not saying this person's story isn't fishy, which it is. Just saying the part about being hung up on is a good possibility.

    14. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by jcostantino · · Score: 1

      I'm with Cingular and have a 2125 Smartphone but pretty much all current phones have POP3 email clients built in. You can just get a data plan ($15/month unlimited data is what I have) and use Gmail or something similar which allows you to send through their SMTP servers.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    15. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      FWIW I have a Motorola v551 with Cingular, and I've set it to check my e-mail on my own mail server over IMAPS. Unfortunately it doesn't like my SSL certificate (and the only way to add more certs is to hack the phone with some Windows app and a USB cable) so I get a warning every time, and it takes forever to connect, but it works. Send mail out via SMTP on cwmx.com (I wanted to use authenticated SMTP with TLS on my server, but that doesn't seem to work). You can download Opera. I can't get an SSH client to work; apparently that requires more hacking (replace part of the JVM with files from a different model of phone?) but aside from that I'm fairly happy with it.

      DO NOT buy a Cingular belt clip (included with their accessory tri-pack with a car charger and earphone thing).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    16. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      So they didn't hang up on you, I guess?

      The "VERY LONG" time consisted of several phone calls, and yes, they did hang up on me at least once.

    17. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      For the love of God! Dont go to Cingular! They are seriously inept, both technically and their customer reps. My old AT&T account is still stuck halfway between AT&T and Cingular, and none of the reps can access or modify it. They told me to "call back in a week". This is one of several examples that has shown me the complete ineptitude of Cingular to handle wireless communications.

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    18. Re:I'm skeptical - T-Mobile service is great by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      I just dealt with T-Mobile service on the weekend, and I have GOT to report what happened. Great service? hmmm...

      Many years ago when I got my current phone I made sure that the system was set so that caller id was withheld unless I specifically released it for a call. On Saturday, I learned that my caller-id info was being sent out. I called customer support. "No problem", she said, she set the flag that said no caller-id sent.

      I tested it. Not only was caller ID being sent, the menu item on the phone that says "restrict caller id" no longer worked.

      I called customer service again. "Your phone is very old", she said. (Yes, several years.) "It's not a T-Mobile-branded phone", she said. (Bought from a T-Mobile dealer, and it says "Voicestream" right on it -- which is who T-Mobile bought out.) "It has probably worn out." HuH? "Yes, just like a toaster, when you use it alot, it wears out." So she's telling me that because I had "restrict caller id" set as the default for so many years, my phone just "wore out" and started sending it again. (The default setting is in THEIR computer, not the phone.)

      Vonage is no better. I ordered it last week, and got assigned a phone number. I decided I'd call it to see what happens. Someone answered. Not me. My "device" hasn't even arrived yet.

      The fourth customer service person I spoke to (number one forwarded me to sales, number two forwarded me to customer support, number three hung up on me after I was on hold for half an hour, and then number four ---) asked me what "device" I was using and I said none. He asked if it had arrived and I said "no". He then asked me if I had plugged it into my network. "The device that hasn't arrived yet, is that the one you are asking me if I plugged in?", I asked him.

      I thought it was an obvious problem if someone else answers a phone when the hardware for that phone line has not yet been installed, but it was pulling teeth to get Vonage to understand what was wrong. "Are you the only one there?" Well, I'm the only one HERE, but I have no idea how many people are THERE where the phone was answered.

      They asked me for a contact number -- and I told them, "when you get it working, you can call me at ...". They promised a problem resolution in 48 hours -- midnight tonight. I'm not holding my breath.

  51. your 'partner' is cheating on you. by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    just kidding .. no really he is .. i'm just messing with you .. but seriously yeah.

  52. WTF?!!? by Cleon · · Score: 1

    My main reaction to this is that they have NO--zero, zilch, zip--excuse for hanging up on you ONCE, much less twice. That is simply outrageous, and you shouldn't have to tolerate it. If this continues to go on, tell them you'll take them to small claims court--if they're charging you for calls you never made, that's called "fraud." If their network has been pwned, that's their problem not yours. You have no obligation to pay for it.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
  53. And who is better? by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    I've had my fair share of nasty complaints about tmobile as well, but who's better? I too got frustrated with them and investigated the possibility of changing carriers, but I found equally stupid and obnoxious errors on the part of each and every carrier reported on the net. The truth is every cell carrier is a huge corporation that doesn't care much about the individual customer, and so as long as things are going well or having problems within their usual range they cope well, but when things get confusing to them it all sorta breaks down. I decided it would be better for me to stick with tmobile and make them resolve the problem than to try to switch to another carrier and deal with their unpredictable problems: at least with tmobile I can make them look at my account and see I've been a customer for 7 years and that makes them a little bit more interested in helping me.

  54. Re:Partner? by HardCase · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're just mostly gay.

    -h-

  55. Be less "helpful" by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We called up T-mobile twice and claim the possibility of phone cloning. Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something.
    The problem is that you're trying to supply a conclusive diagnosis to the T-mobile rep when you actually ahve no freakin' idea why those charges are appearing. Quit trying to offer them an explanation up front. That sounds like a con. Just give them the symptoms-- i.e. calls/charges on the bill that aren't yours-- and let them figure out what's happening.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  56. RTFA by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Or your partner is cheating on you, did receive those calls, and is lying to you about it.

    Did you read the article? He's got two lines, and from the sounds of it, mystery calls are showing up on both lines.

    I have been receiving incoming calls from a 'NBR unavailable', since February, with talk time ranging from 1 minute to an hour. The strangest thing is, I have never received these calls (my phone doesn't ring and I haven't talked to the caller). I only started noticing them when my phone bill was charged over $40 more than my regular bill. Of course, I have a family plan (2 people only, 2 lines)

    1. Re:RTFA by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Sure he says he has two lines but he never explicitly says which phone the calls were actually billed to. For all we know, he can't parse the phone bill and doesn't realize that all the calls were made to his partner's phone.

  57. EVERY phone system has problems like this. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for one of the top 5 American cell phone providers specifically in the department that maintains the billing system. This is the suite of systems that go from switch records to taxed and formatted bills to be sent off to the printing houses (as well as roamer records to be shipped off to other providers, records for partners, etc.)

    Let me tell you something you may not realize -- all of these systems have bugs. Some of them are horrible bugs. Bugs like ringtones getting double-taxed or calls getting billed when you ring a number but don't get an answer with absolutely no way to tell the difference between a legit call and a call that didn't answer.

    Some of these bugs are due to flaws within the billing system. Some are bugs in the switch data (the absolute worst kind because there's no good way to filter the data when good and bad records are all marked up the same). Some are tables screw ups that lead to entire bills getting mangled. Some of these bugs get caught by the bill checking department and others may go for months without being noticed until a customer complains.

    "Number unavailable" calls are most likely from records that were sent to the billing system with no other party number populated (or populated with some default "we don't know what this is" value). Our system simply replaces the other number with your own number and keeps going. Other providers probably cover for it in some other way as well.

    What you have may in fact be legit phone calls that had mangled or incomplete switch records or records from the inter-carrier clearinghouse. Alternately, you may have junk data that you don't deserve to be billed for. It's all up how your company handles such complaints on what to do with about it. I know that my company frequently requests us to go find how many customers were affected and by how much so that we can either strip records from the bills and rerun them or go back and credit the customers proactively. We always try to err on the side of underbilling rather than overbilling customers because it's better to lose some money up front and give customers a pleasant surprise rather than after a nasty lawsuit with all the bad publicity.

    However, if T-Mobile hangs up on you, that just isn't right. Call them up and simply say that you'd like to dispute the charges and have their billing team investigate where the records came from. That'll probably lead to a bug report being filed somewhere in their bureaucracy and a fix for you and others having the same problem. If they give you crap, then switch providers. It's not like there aren't multiple GSM service providers in the US now.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by CallFinalClass · · Score: 1
      Valdrax is exactly right - this isn't anything to do with cloning but rather an issue with the billing system.

      Many times I wish I could mod to "6; This is the correct answer. " Too often I see Slashdot discussions go down a rathole and never come out again... Entertaining but ultimately not informative.

    2. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by dkuntz · · Score: 1

      Well, there are multiples. Cingular, T-Mobile, SunCom, ATT was around but folded into Cingular. I think there are a few others.

      I stopped using GSM based companys... my researched showed that PCS/CDMA is actually better tech, though wont work well outside the US (not that I go outside the US!)

      --
      OMG... I have a sig?
    3. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I actually ran in to a similar problem with Sprint. I was living in New Orleans at the time Katrina hit. Due to the damage caused by Katrina the entire 504 area code was jacked up - so much so that I actually bought a prepaid cell phone with an out of state number just so my family/friends/work could get a hold of me. I could still make outbound calls since the local towers were fine, but inbound routing on the 504 area code was totally jacked up.

      Anyway, about two months after the hurricane I suddenly get this bill that's about $130 over my usual bill. So, I call up to Sprint and explain that I really don't see how I could have possibly used that many minutes when I've only received all of two calls on the phone all month, and had been using the other phone primarily. The lady cops up and says that, yeah, it's probably a bug in the billing system charging me for all of those incoming calls that never actually terminated on my phone. Long story short, they admitted that their system wasn't foolproof and that they would credit me for the overage.

      I know what some people say, but I have had nothing but good service the few times I've had to call a Sprint representative.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    4. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by Kodack · · Score: 1

      In my experience this doesn't happen all that often. Rarely they will find a problem with the MSC billing 911 calls or calls to voicemail but these are quickly taken care of.

      More often than not the problem is that customers get free airtime when there is a billing problem. I see CAMEL (prepaid) phones being able to make free calls thanks to a bug about 10X more than I see free calls being charged.

      You work in the billing department so you aren't getting all of the data. The MSC sends GCDR data with all sorts of useful information like LAC and Cell ID, on and off hook signalling, etc. Records are even generated for cell handovers in which no calls are made.

      Then the billing system pulls these records off the SDM (or they are pushed with outbound billing) and begins to strip out everything not related to billing the call. And once this is done that data is gone. However a local copy is kept on the SDM or possibly on backup tape and if a problem is found it's a simple matter to resend the file or extract the data.

      Sometimes changes to the MSC or HLR can cause some calls to go through for free or other calls that should be free to be charged time. Tmobile, like most providers, will credit airtime back to your phone if a mistake is made. This is business as usual and anybody who answers the phone will have the ability to do so.

      Someone had said that acting like a jerk get's results. Well the squeaky gear gets the oil, that is true, but your just as likely to be given the shaft.

      I've been on both sides of customer service in telecomm and retail for many years and the best way to motivate someone to help you is to be relaxed and appreciative. Customer reps talk to pissed off customers all day long, they are used to it and acting like a jerk on the phone won't even make them lift an eyebrow. But they almost never get praise or a thanks for their job. After talking to angry people all day, the person who is polite and appreciative will stand out.

      If someone is angry at you or your job, getting angry back does nothing but assure a bad call. If someone pushes and you push back, neither moves. If you don't resist and you don't push back, if you withdraw, apologize for the problem that is upseting them , and make an honest effort to help, or be helped, it turns devils into angels, and the worst customer service experiences into the best.

      I always make it a point to give praise when I'm talking to somebody if they did a good job, because they almost never get that. If someone does right by you then talk to their supervisor, let them know you appreciate it. And if the person is just being a booger and your getting no where, let them know you aren't looking for a fight, you are calling for help and appreciate anybody who can give it to you.

    5. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You work in the billing department so you aren't getting all of the data. The MSC sends GCDR data with all sorts of useful information like LAC and Cell ID, on and off hook signalling, etc. Records are even generated for cell handovers in which no calls are made.

      Actually, we do see most of that (except for cell-to-cell handovers). Our billing system takes raw switch data from about 4 different switch types and data from the clearinghouse as inputs. [Edit: Oops, almost put the data types which would be a dead giveaway about where I work...] There is a little filtering to remove irrelevant and unbillable information, but call delivery records, etc. get sent to us right along with the usual MTC/MOC records. In fact, pulling formatted dumps of the data is a common part of diagnosing these problems.

      Personally, I wish OUR switches group was together enough to keep everything on tape. We're the ones who keep backlogs of data for up to a year. Our switches group can't seem to go back and look at data over a week old. One of our biggest problem right now is that two of our larger markets are getting records for when people call a number and get no answer with an incorrectly set call completion indicator. This is causing us to have to strip out a ridiculous amount of data and is causing huge revenue hits in those markets. In addition 4 bills have gone out late -- one a full week late because of stripping, rerunning, backing out, stripping a different way, etc. until we "guesstimate" a way to keep dollar amounts trending for the bill cycle. Our switches group has identified the source of the problem, but it'll be over a month before they implement the fix. (IF they ever implement it. Heck we're still stripping records in one of our markets due to a year old issue.)

      Anyway, it's good to hear from someone who knows the industry from the inside.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by elder-geat · · Score: 1

      I whole-heartedly agree with this. I am the former CIO of a cellular phone carrier. Based on experience, I would say that the problem is much more likely to be in the billing system than in either the phone or the telecommunications infrastructure. The customer-service/billing systems used by carriers are ridiculously complex and changed frequently, primarily in an attempt to keep up with marketing.

    7. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by Kodack · · Score: 1

      Yeah I am suprised at how laid back a lot of sites are with their billing. I mean it's their sole revenue source and they don't want to back it up to tape unless there is an upgrade. Still though the system usually works well. I can count the number of times I've heard of lost billing on one hand.

      The more likely scenario is someone in the billing group needs a file resent or a ticket is opened that requires us to look at the raw records and the original files are long gone. Some of these sites are generating 15GB of billing a week and the disks only hold onto it so long.

      What a lot of people don't realize is the equipment that handles call processing and billing, and such, is ancient. Even new equipment is built using old standards. A lot of the billing equipment runs on 9GB disks, the MSC's have the computing power of a 600mhz power pc, 9600baud modems are still the norm for connection, or a x.25 connection. They use old hardware and old standards. And it works fabulously. It's old but it's stuck around this long because it works.

      I remember when the soft switches started popping up and everybody was scared that they were going to take over the market, then low and behold they are un-reliable.

      At least some of the newer products like the E911 and some of the products based on VxWorks platforms are semi modern.

    8. Re:EVERY phone system has problems like this. by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, when I've been given the run-around by a company for a while, I'll call again in an attempt to get something done. When I know I'm angry, I let them know up front about it, that I realize it isn't THEIR personal fault, and that I hope they realize I'm not angry at them, just about the situation. Helps a lot in most cases. If they actually do solve the problem, I sometimes ask them if talking to their supervisor to commend them would be in any way helpful (as opposed to just causing them grief because the official party line is to not help the customer too much), and follow through if so.

      On the other hand, if someone is so dense they can't figure out how to pro-rate a bill to fix a promotional rate that didn't get applied, then I'll argue it down to the last damned cent: "I'm not going to argue with you about half a cent, sir." (after taking the correct rate per day divided by 30, then rounding up, then adding it repeatedly by the number of days to get a subtotal, then doing the same for the other rate - a 1/2 cent error, multiplied by 30 days, multiplied by 100,000 customers, that's $15,000, is that coming out of your salary, then? The calculation on the bill was done correctly, just with the wrong rates) "Fine, I'm happy you're not going to argue it, so you'll accept my number, or do I need to speak to your supervisor?" (the supervisor was almost as clueless).

      That same bill they screwed up the tax calculations as well (incorrect value, based on the incorrect rate, plus mislabeled as to what was being taxed) - as the "service" rep had no clue, I ended up calling the city franchise board to complain that they were charging incorrect tax rates; I got a call the very next day from someone who DID have a clue, figured out immediately what the correct value was supposed to be, and made it clear he knew who to talk to to get the other problem solved (and listened sympathetically to my rant about clueless service reps who couldn't pro-rate a bill properly). I was very nice to him.

  58. Um dont pay that part of the bill? by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    It is easy, write a letter explaining the situation, highlight the disputed charges and write the check short that much.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    1. Re:Um dont pay that part of the bill? by jxm900 · · Score: 1
      It is easy, write a letter explaining the situation, highlight the disputed charges and write the check short that much.

      It's even easier if you pay by credit card -- just dispute the whole bill with the bank and let them sort it out. If you lose, the only cost to you is the interest on the disputed charge. (With AmEx, this approach can be even more effective since, for many merchants, they withhold all payments until a customer dispute is resolved.)

      -j

  59. And your point is? by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    We're here, were queer, we have cell phones, get used to it.

    1. Re:And your point is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't the homo gene diametrically opposed to cell phone usage? don't you fags still use smoke signals and ass queefs to communicate?

    2. Re:And your point is? by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      Great. If you ever feel lonely, call me and tell me how it feels to be hated and threatened for no valid reason.

      I can relate- I'm a Jew. 60 years ago animals like this OP/AC were stuffing my grandparents into gas chambers. It's a damn shame we've come so far, and yet, left so many so far behind.

  60. Re:dealing with s..t by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

    (In reply to down-modded thread:) You're right, of course—grandparent post could well have been meant sincerely. Even if it were supposed to be a troll, the alternate interpretation is still a good point in the context of this discussion. I'm sorry that you got modded down for your insight.

  61. Rounding! by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

    >> 2/22 at 3:28 pm "NBR unavailable" 17mins usage.
    >> 2/22 at 3:44 pm "-(# I made)---" 3mins usage.

    Call #1 could end at 3:44:31 ... They bill you for 17 minutes
    Call #2 could start at 3:44:33 .. They certainly don't give you 27 free seconds, so it "started" at 3:44

    What you did on your call was equivalent to:
    "My Video Card is broken" to tech support.

    Don't tell them the problem. Tell them the symptoms.

    You: "My Monitor is blank"
    Them: Is your monitor plugged in?
    You: "Oh, wow.. it is. Thanks! I was worried my video card died."

    1. Re:Rounding! by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      You: "My Monitor is blank"
      Them: Is your monitor plugged in?
      You: "Oh, wow.. it is. Thanks! I was worried my video card died."


      Am I the *only* person who sees a problem with this...?
    2. Re:Rounding! by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

      Nah, you're just the only ass who missed the point and commented on a is/isn't typo.

  62. Reasons: how american cell plans work by TheMCP · · Score: 2, Informative

    American cell phone plans come with a largeish (600 - 1500) number of prepaid minutes attached to the plan... so, I pay $40 a month, but the first 1000 minutes of calling (in either direction) don't cost me anything more. Also, there are cheap add-ons to allow, or some plans even include, features such as free calls after 7:30pm or free calls on weekends or free calls to family members. (I can get both free nights and free weekends for another $10 a month, for example.)

    So, put these things together and for $50 a month (just slightly more than the cost you mention for your monthly bill) you can end up paying a bill that doesn't actually charge you for any calls except calls to non-family members made before 7pm on weekdays that exceed the first 1000 minutes. For most people, that far exceeds actual usage, so they don't care if incoming calls are being included because they almost never end up paying a per-minute rate anyway.

    1. Re:Reasons: how american cell plans work by houghi · · Score: 1

      50USD is a lot. I use up about 3-5EUR per month and that is mostly in sms messages. Additonaly I use Skype for most of my calls for about another 2-3EUR per month. My total phonebill is about 5-8 EUR per month.

      OTOH I see people in real life and/or email.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Reasons: how american cell plans work by merreborn · · Score: 1

      People don't use SMS in the US like they do in the EU. We like to talk.

      Personally, I wouldn't mind an increase in SMS usage over here, but a lot of our phones suck in that department -- mine's got a tiny keypad, and the entire SMS system on it is web based, so every action takes 30+ seconds, because you're loading a webpage.

      To send a message, and read one:
      Open the 'messaging' app.
      Wait 30 seconds for the menu page to load
      Select a recipient
      Wait 30 seconds for the 'send a message' page to load
      Type message on tiny phone keypad
      Wait 30 seconds for the 'message sent!' page to load
      Go back to the index. Select the inbox.
      Wait 30 seconds for the inbox to load
      Select message
      Wait 30 seconds for the message to load ...Oh, and you get a 'network error' about 10% of the time, after a 60 second timeout. I fucking hate this phone.

    3. Re:Reasons: how american cell plans work by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Wow, what kind of crappy phone do you have? Even the super cheap virgin mobile phone I was using for a while (base model from ~3 yrs ago) had a usable sms system, you type out the message and click send, no webpage loading. T9 txt mode makes typing messages really quick, even on the super tiny samsung phone I am using now.

      But I agree that people in the US generally don't use SMS. The only person I really SMS with on a regular basis is an immigrant from vietnam. I just call everyone else.

      --
      Q.
    4. Re:Reasons: how american cell plans work by maxume · · Score: 1

      Of course, they are paying a per minute rate, whether they choose to think about it that way or not(total monthly minutes used/monthly bill). Mostly, the cell companies are gambling that your usage costs less than they charge you. The odds probably favor the house.

      The high per minute fee that they charge for overages is not a reflection of their costs or a fair price, but of the fact that they want people in a bucket that they don't consistantly use up.

      Not that I think any of that is a revelation to anybody, but it bothers me that people think of their night and weekend minutes and such as "free" and not as "included".

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  63. To sum up by goldcd · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's virtually impossible to close a GSM phone - and surely if somebody had, they'd have been making obscenely expensive outgoing calls on it. Two possibilities:
    T-Mobile have cocked up - they can easily check the calls and get more information about them to confirm if this is the case.
    Your partner is lying/mistaken about receiving calls. If I had a suspicious mind, I'd just 'borrow' his phone and check the call log on the handset - see if one of the mysterious calls appears there.

  64. Re:You get charged for receiving calls? - Cheaper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The total telecom costs are more competitive and come out less expensive in a system like ours (North America - mobile party pays for incoming and terminating calls; no landline to mobile termination fees).

    In the UK (and most other countries), the landline-to-mobile rate is fixed at a high price. The mobile companies have no strong incentive to lower their termination fees, because they're not charging "their" customers - it's the other schmucks (landline customers) who get the shaft (customers they want to steal away from landline!). Of course there could be some limited competition on the landline side to get the "lowest" mobile termination fees, but in the end the landline carriers still have to negotiate that with the mobile provider. How much would 1000 minutes cost from landline to mobile in the UK? £36.10 - £215.40, depending on the carrier and time-of-day?

    In the North American system, the entire minute bucket of incoming and outgoing minutes is negotiated between the mobile provider and their direct customer. Therefore, there is significant competition between carriers to provide the lowest total price. In other words, when you select a carrier here, you are negotiating the price on both sides. Over there, you are only negotiating the outgoing side of the equation (for the most part). How much would 1000 minutes (either direction) cost in the US? $40 (or free on nights/weekends)?

    In the future, it seems like unlimited wireless is a distinct possibility (it already exists in my market!). In North America, that means that there will be no mobile-related charges whatsoever for incoming or outgoing. Do you think that foreign carriers will let go of mobile termination fees even if/when outgoing calls become free (unlimited)? In my case, I could pay $70/month and nobody would pay any per-minute fees to or from my phone!

  65. Re:Similar problem = Cingular by Trojan35 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was billed for 350 text messages in the span of 2 minutes. I called and told her I didn't do that and wanted the $35 refunded. She said "it's in the system." I pointed out that it was physically impossible for anyone to send that many text messages in 2 minutes and that I had used text messaging 0 times in the year i'd been with Cingular. Her response? "Computers don't make mistakes."

    Maybe I was a little harsh: "You're an idiot. I'm cancelling my account not because of Cingular's service or this charge, but because you ma'am, are an idiot." The cancellation rep tried to convince me to stay and generously offered to cut the charges in half... "I shouldn't have to negotiate how much I pay you for your mistake. How about you refund the full amount and then pay me $100 in consulting fees for the hour I've spent identifying bugs in your system?" Then came the offer of a full refund, and I still cancelled.

  66. Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by jageryager · · Score: 1
    BTW, I used to work for Logica, in the telecoms division, and have a LOT of knowledge

    If someone HAS cloned your SIM, and both phones are attached at the same time, the network would register a fault, as a SINGLE sim number is assiciated at two different locations. It woudl create a fault in the system which would prevent both yours and the clone SIM from working. This is actually one of the main reasons why Cellphones are not usable on Planes (even if it is prooven to be safe to the electronics). The phone woudl try to log onto multiple cells at the same time, causing a lot of strain on the network, or even malfunction.

    What? What about when you are on the ground and happen to be standing in between 3 different towers, an equal distance from each? Wouldn't that be the same kind of situation you are talking about in an air plane? YOu may know a LOT about cell phones, but this thing about Cellphones and Planes sounds wrong to me.

    --
    "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"-B.Franklin
    1. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by david.given · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What? What about when you are on the ground and happen to be standing in between 3 different towers, an equal distance from each? Wouldn't that be the same kind of situation you are talking about in an air plane?

      Because all the cells need to negotiate with each other to ensure that your phone is only logged in to one cell at a time? And if you're on a plane, not only can your mobile see a lot of cells (meaning that negotiation is expensive), but because you're moving fast, the system has to renegotiate very frequently as you move from cell to cell?

    2. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So explain the cell phone calls from flight 93 on 9-11-2001 then!

    3. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fakes, designed to make you feel patriotic.

    4. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by houghi · · Score: 0

      http://www.loosechange911.com/

      OTOH I have personaly spoken with somebody on a flight from Brussels to Athens and somebody I know who worked in the airline industry told me the only reason that you are not allowed to call in an airplane is because it does strange things with the flight recording.
      It suddenly tripples the motors RPM for a fraction of a second and such stuff. Nothing dangerous he told me.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      The GP is spouting nonsense. The reality is much simpler: (1) there is some (valid, although possibly overblown) concern about interference with aircraft telemetry, and (2) the airlines want to make money off phones on the plane. They do not want competition, obviously. (And, (3) imagine being stuck next to Jerry Maguire from New York to Los Angeles if he was allowed to talk on his cell phone.)

    6. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simple. Because the network was designed such that for users on the ground, it is NOT possible for a phone on the ground to be visible to more than one tower on the same frequency with similar signal strength, as towers in adjacent cells operate on different frequencies within the carrier's assigned band. If weird propagation DOES cause more than one tower on the same frequency to be able to hear the phone, it is easy for the network to figure out which tower is appropriate based on the signal strength. (The signal will be very weak at any tower other than the nearest one to the phone.)

      This changes when a user goes above the maximum altitude of a user the system was designed to handle. All of a sudden the user will have LOS *with high signal strength* to multiple towers on the same frequency. In older systems, this could cause calls to be billed multiple times. In newer systems, multiple billing is eliminated and the network can handle it, EXCEPT that even if the phone is only communicating with a single tower, it will still cause significant interference with other towers that it normally would not, and as a result a handful of airborne users can significantly decrease the capacity of the network. Essentially, instead of being a single user in one cell for the purposes of capacity handling, they become an additional user in every cell within LOS of the aircraft. (Remember, even if they aren't actively communicating with a particular tower, their signal is still present and causes interference.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whereas you do make valid points which are very possibly true, you dont say why my point is nonsense. It is perfectly possible that both of us are right!

      I told you, I worked for LogicaCMG, we provide manufacture Mobile Network equipment (Logica Mobile Networks). If you dont know who LogicaCMG is and the size of its involvement in Telecoms, well back in 2003, 75% of the worlds SMS all went through LogicaCMG Software. So now you know my experience, and expertise, let me continue.

      WHen a plane that is so high up crosses a densely populated city with a high cell density A cellphone will attempt to log onto many of those cells at the same time. Both the phone and the cells on the network will see almost equal "signal strengths" (distance between plane and ground is greater than distqance between cells, litttle bit of elementary geometry required here.. sorry I dont have a picture decribing the phemonenom). As such the netowrk does some form of conflict resolution which is communication and processor intensive.

      s the plane is flying at a high speed, its possibel the phone is connecting on and off to many cells in a short time (signals are weaker too), this causes a lot of strain on the network, sometimes causing it to go down temporarily as its automatically restarted.

      Multiply this by 100 or more phones on a single plane, and you can see how much of a strain this can be on the network.

      A network glitch like this looks bad to the operator, as customers on the ground are cut off their calls for a few seconds (there are some SLAs that operators have to publish here in regards to call disconnections)

      Our reasearch was actually contracted by Orange, and O2 in 1997 to helpfind ways to improve the ability to deal with mobiles on planes affecting cells on the ground.

      We have tested this phenomenon in our test labs many times to try and improve the systems.

      Together with better switching algoritms on the cells, and also the use of PICO trancievers located on the plane itself, we believe we have found some solutions for operators.

      But it is TRUE that the mobile networks were imforming the FAA and other airline bodies about this problem. Face it, they woudl me most happy for the extra income created when thier phones are used in the air, but currently their systems can break when they are.

      Before anyone informs me that cells were being used in one of the 9/11 planes. The plane was flying low over an area with much lower cell density.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    8. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by SuperRob · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I used to work at AT&T Wireless. I was told that the ban on in-flight cell phone use was an FCC regulation, not FAA (so the airplane equipment theory is pretty much bunk), and was further told that the ban was due to complications in billing due to the speed at which you are travelling between cell sites.

    9. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, both the FCC and the FAA prohibit the use of cell phones in flight. For different reasons.

    10. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I used to work for the mobility group at Microsoft. The billing issues really are overblown, as are the cellular interference issues. I know, you know, and we both know that we both know that the cellular equipment manufacturers made a set of assumptions which proved to be incomplete, but that they could have fixed those assumptions.

      And as to "the extra revenue from phone calls"...you know perfectly well that most European carriers operate their voice networks as a way to get people to send SMS's. The voice networks are a loss leader for their profitable services in data.

    11. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Chazmati · · Score: 1
      I told you, I worked for LogicaCMG, we provide manufacture Mobile Network equipment (Logica Mobile Networks). If you dont know who LogicaCMG is and the size of its involvement in Telecoms, well back in 2003, 75% of the worlds SMS all went through LogicaCMG Software. So now you know my experience, and expertise, let me continue.
      No, now we know where you (claimed to have) worked. And if I knew anything about LogicaCMG I might acknowledge that there is some expertise there; whether or not any belonged to you we may never know. :)
    12. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by kinglink · · Score: 1

      To be honest it's the same reason. The FCC does prohibit it for this reason. The FAA works with the FCC for the same reason, while a few instruments could possibly be interfered with by a cell phone, none are as critical as they make it out to be. Unless one was stuck in a major instrument only situation (IFR for those who know flight) the instruments arn't "critical". The fact is there's little proof that a cell phone can even interfer with the instruments.

      At the same time we are blowing this out of proportion. If one could do this one evil terrorist would have a plane, fly up to 15,000 feet and use a cell phone laughing at his plan. While this doesn't work, having a couple hundred people using cellphones on planes at the same time definatly would have a detremental affect on the cell system. But wait. There's no proof of this either.

      Now first off yes, a cell phone CAN interfer with instruments in planes. But so can anything that creates an electromanatic field. I'm still allowed to use my DS (they probably don't know it can use wifi) and I've never taken down the plane. Same with a PSP. While there's a slight chance of a problem, the critical times of flight are those in which a plane takes off and lands. Thus why no electronics are allowed on during those two times.

      But yes there's a danger of both situations happening, however there's no concrete proof that it could happen. And if you want to tell me that it will, let me ask you this, we're so afraid of terrorists, why arn't cell phones not allowed on planes if they are so dangerous? We could easily leave them in our suitcases or have them placed in a suitcase like cart that some planes carry. So why are we allowed to take them on board.

      Simple. They arn't as dangerous as meantioned. It's more likely both bans are similar to smoking bans. Does second hand smoke kill? Not really. Milk can be provent to kill more people. Is second hand smoking enjoyable? HELLLLL no. And thus why we have no smoking bans in most places.

    13. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by JamesP · · Score: 0

      You seem to be forgetting one thing...

      Speed is a HUGE thing when dealing with digital communications. Because of channel estimation issues, it is efficient when moving at lower speeds (like 300kpm for GSM phones) but no way it is going t work at airplane speeds (like 800/900kph)

      Even though it may attempt to negotiate (because of lower BW most likely), the voice channel is not going to work properly.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    14. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      It works OK for a few phones. One or two phones in a single airplane shouldn't cause much of a problem if the network isn't already swamped. The more active phones you have flying, the more switching the network has to do.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    15. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting


          Do you believe everything the government feeds you?

          I know someone who tried this recently. They forgot to turn off their cell, and remembered mid-flight. They looked at the phone, and had no signal. Since it hadn't caused any problems so far, they left it on. The didn't have a signal again until they had almost landed (like the last minute or so of the flight).

        If terrorists were in control of an aircraft, would they be letting people call their family? hell no. If you're controlling a situation, you control everything about it. There's no half ass "ok, call mom and tell her you're ok".

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    16. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I agree with your 3rd reason more than any others.

          I'd prefer 200+ passengers sitting quietly watching the in-flight movie, than 200+ passengers in a small space all chattering on their freakin' cell phones.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    17. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by tricorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is both. Airline operators prohibit operating radio transmitting equipment on board an airplane in flight (FAA requires that any equipment that is going to be used be tested for safe operation on commercial flights), but even private pilots aren't allowed to use cell phones in the air due to FCC regulations.

      Adjacent cell towers coordinate frequencies in use, and do handoffs to the next cell as you move from one to the other. In an airplane, you are "adjacent" to many towers at once, even those that are so far apart that they can't coordinate and hand off. Even though YOUR call may end up working, you're probably disconnecting other calls over a wide area as you step on their frequency (and since you're about 5 miles away from the cell you're actually talking to that's directly below you, your signal is still about 50% as strong over a 5 mile radius around that tower).

    18. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Exocrist · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty good point that most people seem to forget about. It doesn't seem to be as valid in the rest of the world as in the US, since their coverage is generally better, but in the US, at 20,000+ feet, you're not going to get a cell signal, almost guaranteed, much less a consistent one.

    19. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also apparently inteferes with the intercom system, much like a cellphone inteferes with a nearby pair of speakers. That's also how pilots know if any cellphones are still on - the "bu-da-dup bu-da-dup bu-da-dup" sound over their headphones.

    20. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by thogard · · Score: 1

      What GMS phones do is cause spikes in the thing in the front of the plane that tells the pilot when they are over the VOR station and should do their turn. If the plane is in the clouds where they have rocks in the clouds and your pilot thinks they are over the VOR and turns into the rocks, you won't be around to tell people that phones don't cause any problems.

      Phones aren't allowed to be used at the start of the flight when the VOR receiver is being calibrated either.

      Plus the outer marker radios pick up that SMS pulse noise thats typical when your phone is near speakers and no one wants to listen to that crud.

    21. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by amavida · · Score: 1

      "One or two phones in a single airplane shouldn't cause much of a problem"

      Look dickhead,

      1) Aircraft contain many radio based navigation systems that are vital for getting said craft safely from point a to point b.
      2) Cell phones are essentially radios.

      Having a bunch of jerks toting uncontrolled radio transmitters inside an aircraft is Not A Good Thing (TM), beleive me...

    22. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Look dickhead,

      I meant they shouldn't cause much of a problem with the cell network. We weren't talking about interference with equipment on the airplane. That's a completely separate issue.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    23. Re:Seems Wrong.. Cell phones work in airplanes... by amavida · · Score: 1

      it's academic wankery waffling on about switching cells etc when the most likely outcome is more probably a smoking cater, dickhead.

  67. Re:"My Partner"? by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1

    Do you have NOTHING better to do than to waste /.'s bandwidth? Seriously, even if anyone in their right mind agreed with you, do you really think that anyone gives a shit about your opinions? Do you think anyone cares about you think? We don't. And for the record, I'm a lesbian. And I laughed last time I got a derogatory comment. It was funny!

  68. Re:the other man in his life by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    "partner", hmmm?

    Married people are bad enough about staying faithful.
    The unmarried fare far worse, and pairs of men even
    worse than that.


    Have you thought that maybe there is a possibility the poster was a woman?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  69. Clearing up a few facts . . . by csflux · · Score: 0

    From the responses I have seen posted, I would like to clear up a few facts ...
    1. Calls can overlap -- call waiting, call conferencing ... if you (A) have a conversation with (B) and (C) calls, you tell (B) you need to talk to (C) and switch the call over. Problem arises when (B) doesn't bother to hang up and the call overlaps...
    2. T-mobile will not block a number - their system is not set up that way.
    3. Just because the caller ID shows up as 'Number unavailable' doesn't mean you don't know who it is ... if the cell phone identifies as an unknown caller but matches the number to a contact in your phone book, the contact's name will show up...
    4. If a rep really did hang up on you and you remember the dates/times, you can file a complaint with another rep who has the ability to look at the notes from your previous calls and find out who you spoke to. The reps don't hang up on customers because they feel like it, there is normally a 3 strikes warning if you start using bad language or a dead air script if they cannot hear you. If they hang up on you, it is immediately flagged so its not in the rep's best interest to ever disconnect without following the proper chain.
    5. If you are really worried about cloning, go to the t-mobile website http://www.t-mobile.com/Contact.aspx and write a letter or e-mail or send us a fax with a detailed description of what you think has happened.

  70. Use the FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a problem with Nextel Customer Service. A $120 charge showed up on my bill with no explination. Customer support couldn't/wouldn't explain the charge. After about 5 useless calls to customer service I filed a complaint with the FCC. A VP from Nextel called me back withing 2 days removed the charge and gave me a $100 credit. Worked real nice :)

    1. Re:Use the FCC by barzok · · Score: 1

      FCC != BBB

      Nextel actually does have to answer to the FCC, and the FCC does have some clout.

    2. Re:Use the FCC by redragon · · Score: 1

      Yes, AT&T jerked my chain by changing my long-distance rates without notice. When I went through all of the "managers" at the customer service location, and they were still unwilling to fix things, I contacted the FCC. Two weeks later the problem was resolved.

      --
      - Sighuh?
    3. Re:Use the FCC by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I got ripped off by AT&T, too. When I called up the AT&T rep to get put on a long distance plan, they put me on a decent plan with a low per minute charge and an international calling plan. The next month, after using only a small amount of long distance, I got a bill for about $500! When I called to ask why I was being charged over a dollar a minute when I was on a seven cents a minute plan, they said that that plan is not available in my area. I told them I was sold that plan by one of their representatives. They told me that they could not be held responsible for what their authorized representative told me and that if I did not pay they would put me up for collections. The only concession they made was to give me a much worse plan which WAS available in my area, and retroactively repriced the previous bill to that new plan. I still didn't get my seven cents a minute, but at least it got knocked back to 15 cents or so per minute.
      Oh, yes, and they still assessed the monthly fee for the plans which were not available in my area.
      Unfortunately, I had no recourse to go to another company because my local phone company handled all long distance services and resold them through AT&T. So it was effectively a monopoly. Paul

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  71. Re:My "partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also hilarious to me. When I read the article I didn't even notice it said partner as opposed to some REAL family members, like a wife.

  72. BBB by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    For the most part the BBB is a reporting service. So they really dont "do" anything, other then report the complaints to people that ask.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  73. Uh... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    Do you have an actual T-Mobile store in your area? And I don't mean the kiosks in the mall.

    If you do, go into the store and tell them. It's not like they can turn you away. If they give you shit, demand the manager.

    If you don't have a store in your area, call T-Mobile and immediately ask to speak to a supervisor.

    If you really think its cloned, suck it up and make them give you a new number.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  74. Rule #1 by csoto · · Score: 1

    There is no Project Mayhem!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  75. Re:the other man in his life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Married people are bad enough about staying faithful.
    The unmarried fare far worse, and pairs of men even
    worse than that.

    I'm sure r00t has enough direct empirical research
    to back these claims up. He Sure sounds bitter enough.
    Stop being so bitter, r00t, I'm sure your butt
    buddy still loves you!

  76. If he had said wife, would anyone question? by hargettp · · Score: 1

    That is, because American society does not yet fully appreciate the validity of gay relationships, the word "husband" (indicative of a committed legal bond sanctioned by the state) can't be used, so he has to say "partner."

    Yet, if he had said "wife," also indicative of a commited legal bond sanctioned by the state, would anyone have questioned whether his wife had really received these calls, when the poster didn't indicate as such? Is somehow a gay relationship less "committed" or less "trustworthy" than a straight relationship? I think not.

    Discrimination shows up in the oddest ways, even among the educated and tolerant (yeah, I know this is Slashdot, yada, yada,...). It's important to recognize the possibility of it for what it is, so that we can all grow.

    1. Re:If he had said wife, would anyone question? by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      Indeed we don't really know what the level of commitment is. He referred to his "partner" which is somewhat ambiguous. Perhaps they would be married if they could but maybe not. Unmarried hetero couples will on occasion refer to their SO as their "partner" and I have even heard rumors that some long married hetero couples haved screwed around on each other.

      I think you severely underestimate the cynicism of the slashdot crowd if you think that no one would question the fidelity of the wife in your hypothetical scenario.

    2. Re:If he had said wife, would anyone question? by clustermonkey · · Score: 1

      This entire comment sounds like self-righteous anti-American trolling to me.

      If the poster had actually read previous posts, they would see that many posters did not actually pick up on the significance of the use of the word "partner" and made the very same suggestions of infidelity about his supposed girlfriend.

      It is true that discrimination shows up in the oddest ways - the most odd being in the mind of a person so completely sure they are being discsiminated against they they see discrimination where there isn't any. No one even mentioned any difference between trustworthiness of hetero or homo couples - you brought it up yourself in your own mind through your own imagined prejudices.

      I guess if someone feels less adequate for their life's choices, they keep trying to justify those feelings through the supposed actions or thoughts of other people. Those homosexual couples I know that are truly comfortable with themselves don't see discrimination around every corner or in every universal life situation that just so happens to involve a gay couple.

    3. Re:If he had said wife, would anyone question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is, because American society does not yet fully appreciate the validity of gay relationships, the word "husband" (indicative of a committed legal bond sanctioned by the state) can't be used, so he has to say "partner."

      How many gay people do you know? All the ones I know who are married (be it state sanctioned or otherwise) use the term "husband" or "wife" in colloquial speech. Those who are unmarried but long term usually use the term partner. Shorter-term uses the boyfriend/girlfriend as appropriate.

      Yet, if he had said "wife," also indicative of a commited legal bond sanctioned by the state, would anyone have questioned whether his wife had really received these calls

      Yes, many people have already referred to his "girlfriend" (not even catching on to the same-sex relationship) being unfaithful. So the answer, had you cared to look for it and been willing to accept what you found without bias, was already there.

      Discrimination shows up in the oddest ways, even among the educated and tolerant

      And if you look hard enough and are eager enough to see it, you can even find it where it doesn't exist.

      It's important to recognize the possibility of it for what it is, so that we can all grow.

      Indeed. I do hope you grow from this and reach a point where you no longer have to make up boogeymen to defend a cause you happen to feel needs your defense, regardless of the actual necessity.

  77. Re:"My Partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you the hot kind of lesbian? you know, the kind that still looks like a girl? or the kind that lets the facial hair grow in and wears flannel?

  78. Re:the other man in his life by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    Have you thought that maybe there is a possibility the poster was a woman?

    Okay, now you're getting into a whole make-believe world here.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  79. Not Trying to Beat A Dead Horse But.... by wolff000 · · Score: 1

    I often use the word partner to refer to my fiancee who is a woman and I am a guy. She is my partener in every sense of the word so why is it in appropriate to use the term. i'm not saying I always asay partner I just use it as uch as girlfriend fiancee or wife they are all interchangeable for me as we have already made the committment we don't need the states invovlvement. Anyways the use of the word partner is not and has never been strictly for the gay community. Hell I've used partner refering to my best friend from high school and we are both straight. As far as the cell problem I would call back t-mobile and go off on people till they remove the charges. Believe me if you yell at them long enough they will do it.

    --
    WTF?
  80. There's a reason the AT&T logo is called Death by Tetravus · · Score: 1

    They have jedi mind powers to convince you that your reality is not real. Only the telco reality exists.

    Where is the rebel base?

  81. why don't you... by sh3l1 · · Score: 1

    does your phone bill include what number these calls were from? if so, try to call that person back. If he starts talking to you about bombs and such before realizing it is not the person on the Caller ID, then call CTU (the one with Jack Bauer). They will set up a trace on the call and then start shooting his kneecaps if he doesn't tell you what they are planning....

    Or, as was suggested earlier, call up and before saying anything ask for the person's name and boss's number. That way if he does hang up, you are one step further up the chain of command. You could even keep doing the same thing until you get the CEO on the line. :)

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
  82. Re:"My Partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *snicker*
    "They're in it with the aliens! They're building landing strips for gay martians!"
    *snicker*

    Anyone get the reference?

  83. I Had a Similar Problem by popo · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I had a similar problem involving T-Mobile "T-Zones". While idle, my phone
    was apparently contacting T-Zones. In fact, once in a while I'd 'catch' it
    making an (autonomous) one minute T-Zones connection (because the phone
    would light up).

    Since I wasn't a T-Zones subscriber, T-Mobile billed me for each and every
    connection, even though the connections were happening 'automatically'.

    For the first few months I didn't notice it because I was on the road and
    running up massive phone bills anyway, but by the time I realized what was
    going on, I was $5,000 in the hole. It took months of phone calls to customer
    service for them to even acknowlege that there was a problem. I even made a
    short video of my phone 'turning itself on and connecting to T-Zones'.

    I will say, that T-Mobile ended up being great, and clearing my bill of
    all the charges, but only after 50 or so calls to CS.

    Total nightmare.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:I Had a Similar Problem by 2much4u · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I too have T-Mobile in the States. I had a similiar issue where as I had 2 phones on my plan. T-Mobile was nothing but entirely professional with me, able to cut the phone off while talking to them, and turn it back on 8 hours later for no fees, etc... (I actually did suspect my 'Partner') I have a feeling that you definitely did not talk to the CSR properly. Don't try to diagnose the problem for them, simply question the calls that you didn't make. I know from my T-Mobile bills, that each line is split out and detailed by default from T-Mobile, so you should know from looking at it which phone line is in question. If it is your partners' line, you might have to evaluate your trust in your partner and even the people around where your partner would store their phone. But in either case, T-Mobile has never hung up on me, so either you got the wrong Rep or you simply were not talking to them properly. GOOD LUCK !

  84. Customer what?! by The_Candyman · · Score: 1

    T-mobile has the best customer service?! Is that why it took me over 3 months to get my parents number ported over, and it would have taken longer if I hadn't taken over and got in their face. They had the worst customer service towards me, several hangups and hundreds of transfers later, I finally got the numbers ported over, then the bill was never right, so I finally had them switch over to Cingular to shich I have had very little problems.

  85. obvious answer by Intangion · · Score: 1

    has anyone put forth the obvious here?

    your 'partner' is cheating on you and lying about using the minutes ;)

  86. I've Got It by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
    Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something. Any advice to what this could be?

    Bad customer service.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  87. File a complaint by Kelmar · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you need to call the FCC or the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission). I know from working at MCI for several years that the phone company is supposed to handle your claims of fraud very seriously, and if they aren't you need to talk with the government about it.

    FCC Info (try them first):
    http://www.fcc.gov/contacts.html
    1-888-225-5322

    SEC Info:
    http://www.sec.gov/contact.shtml
    1-800-SEC-0330

    Good Luck!

  88. pr0n from T-Mobile by AndreyFilippov · · Score: 1

    When I signed up for T-mobile last December (I wanted the single phone that works in US and Europe) I started to receive some junk messages from mobilebabes.com (it happened first right in the store). I did not really use the phone and for the whole month it was laying turned off. To my surprise I received a bill with $20 charges for "Premium Services" and was told these charges were legitimate and come from some "3-rd party", not T-Mobile. After several hours of waiting on the phone and they told me that it was previous owner of the number who signed up fro the service and I have to contact the service provider and unsubscribe. I was also told that they can not remove the MMS service (I don't need it - just voice, text messages and Internet) so the only what they can do is change my number. It costs $15, but they will not charge me.

    After that we exchanged many dozens of emails - but from their side it was usually a robot. And the name (like "Christina" below were probably randomly generated - it was never the same when I replied. Inside part of the emails was also generated from the standard snippets (like "today I spent more than an hour studying your account...") - they never answered the questions I asked, substituting my questions with some standard ones

    Dear Andrey Filippov,
    Thank you for taking the time to contact T-Mobile. My name is Christina and I will be assisting you today... ...


    And it took me three months until they compensated me their porno-charges. The text messaging service (I'm paying for) does not work, but I'm just completely tired communicating with those robots to fix it. I should write some script to do that for me - then there will be equals.

    Nobody was able to answer - if the only way to stop MMS messages coming to my phone is to change it's number - does it mean that anybody who knows my number can send me pay-per-message junk?

  89. Cellphone companies are full of horror stories by Siberwulf · · Score: 1

    Last year my wife's phone was stolen. We reported it immediately (that same day) to Sprint, and had the phone number shut off so no calls could be made to or from the phone.

    About a month later, we finally found a phone on Ebay, and bought it and had the number turned back on and all was well. Later that night, we got a little text message from a random number with a silly joke on it. Thinking it might have been one of her friends just sending random jokes, we just ignored it. The jokes continued about one a day, sometimes two a day for the next two weeks.

    When I got the bill, I was astounded that it was almost $50 more than normal. I immediately called Sprint and asked what these "Premium Text Message" charges were for. They told me "Oh thats normal text messaging fees". I called BS. Normal text message fees are 10 cents per, not 99 cents per message.

    After talking about about 5 people that night, and wasting an hour of my time, I found out the text messages from one of those Joke-a-Day services, which had been subscribed to on my wife's phone. Looking at the date of the text messages and charges, it was obvious that they started right in the middle of when we didn't have the phone. The phone was stolen and "shut Off" At the end of August, and reactivated at the beginning of October. The text messages started showing up on the bill in September.

    I politely told the person to credit off the fraudulent charges, and stop the messages coming to my phone. The CSR told me that they can't do that. They said that they're not the one charging me, its the Joke-a-day service. I told them that I don't buy that, since when I make my check out, it says "Sprint", not "Sprint/JokeCrap". I told them to do the leg work, since it was their issue, not mine.

    After two more calls and about 4 hours wasted talking to 10 people, I was told to send the word "STOP" to their joke service, and that would stop the text messages. I was also told I'd finally get a credit for the previous month, and that if any more text messages showed up, I'd be responsible for them. I said "Well, if your directions work, then fine, thats ok with me"

    Needless to say, I got more messages the next day than I had previously. I called back to Sprint and told them the issue. I asked what the hell do I need to do. They said they would then block all text messages at the tower, so my wife wouldn't be able to get any more. I said ok, thats fine.

    The next day, no text messages! I was thrilled and thought I had seen the end of this. Not so. I followed up the next and checked if there were any fees on the account from the previous week. Sure enough they were there. Sprint had managed to block the Messages from getting to her phone, but we were still getting billed for them being sent!

    It came down to having to change her phone number in order to get the messages to stop. (In that process they accidentally changed mine, and I nearly lost my phone number).

    The billing part gets better, too. After the first credit I got, they told me no more credits. I explained to them that since they didn't know how to operate their own system, and it caused me to get billed incorrectly, I'd be damned if I'm paying for it. AFter another 3 calls and getting myself escalated up to a region support manager, I finally said, "If you don't resolve this on this call, I'm going to the FCC and going to explain the whole thing out". That got her attention, and she credited off the remaining charges.


    I would have dropped them faster, but it would have cost me $150 per phone to drop out of the contract :(

    1. Re:Cellphone companies are full of horror stories by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

      I've seen more and more of these "pay-per-message" services being advertised on TV every day...jokes, pick-up lines, possum recipes...you name it. I've always figured these things were a total scam designed to trick cell-yielding 14 year olds with lazy parents who are bad at math.

      After reading your post, and a few others, I am begining to see what a GREAT SCAM these service are! I haven't been giving this the true paranoia it deserves. Heck, I could write a script to send you (and every other compatible cell client) "Zaphod's Opinion DuJour", billing $0.10 per message, and then just sit back and laugh as you all try to get the charges reversed (assuming you even notice it in the first place).

      Of course, having shame, I would never do this. However, I bet I'm not the *only* one who has this thought rolling around in their head...

  90. don't speculate by Michael+Wolf · · Score: 1

    The cloning is a red herring. Your bill is wrong. Tell them, ask them to fix it. You don't know if it's cloning, and you don't care. By throwing out irrelevant theories, you are just distracting from the real issue.

  91. Re:My "partner"? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny
    My, what a vivid description. It appears that you have been putting a considerable amount of thought and visualization into this.

    I wonder what that could mean... (not that there's anything really wrong with it).

  92. Re:"My Partner"? by curecollector · · Score: 1

    "...take a look at the soil around any large city with a big underground homosexual population - Des Moines, Iowa, perfect example. Look at the soil around Des Moines, Stuart. You can't build on it. You can't grow anything on it. The gov't says that it's due to poor farming, but I know it's the queers..."

    ....or something like that.

  93. Re:My "partner"? by faraway · · Score: 1

    Your bigotry is funny to me. I hope they institute new taxes such as useless matter taxes. Preferrably taxed by the pound.

  94. CSR by The+Pim · · Score: 1
    no matter how obvious it is that the customer is right, you must insist that he is wrong
    To inject some levity into your miserable experience.... My friend invented a game called CSR. It's real simple: One person pretends to be calling customer support with some problem, and the other pretends to be the customer service representative (CSR). The caller's goal is to get some satisfaction, and the CSR's goal is to deny it and get the caller off the line. For both parties, the game is to remain adamant but remotely credible in the face of all explanation and logical argument, which may involve playing dumb, emphasizing one side an issue while ignoring the other, snowing the other with regulations or jargon, etc. It's fun because you have to behave the opposite of how you deal with rational human beings otherwise.
    --

    The evaluation of an action as 'practical' . . . depends on what it is that one wishes to practice.
  95. We don't care by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 1

    "We don't care. We don't have to. We're the phone company."

  96. Your example is suspect by SPickett · · Score: 1

    The example you give might be expanable. Your 17 minute call could have started at 3:28:01 and lasted until 3:44:35. Maybe if it's over 16.5 minutes, they bill it as 17 minutes. Having completed the call, you immediately call someone else. It takes you ten seconds to dial and that call begins at 3:44:45. I would expect them to log that call as being at 3:44. Is it also possible that you made one call and your partner made the other one? Because you checked with him to see if the calls were his, I'm assuming you can't tell from the bill whose call is whose.

  97. Re:the other man in his life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you thought that maybe there is a possibility the poster was a woman?

    A woman named Cliff?

  98. Two fags... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not make a family...Should be a fag plan and not a family plan.

  99. AT&T sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After having my landline (provided by AT&T) disconnected in 2004, I had ignored the bill for some time (I had other, more important things to spend money on, like food) and moved away. A year later, I receive a bill in the mail (even though I never told them my new address) with a charge on it for a 411 call from a payphone looking for me. It wasn't much added onto the bill, but left it alone to be handled at a later date.

    About a month ago, I sent a payment in for the full amount owed. Waited a few days and contacted AT&T. Regardless of the fact that I was transferred around for 3 hours at which point I was informed that "Oh, you're account was with AT&T BEFORE the merger... You'll need to call this number" I called that number and was informed "The credit department just closed 10 minutes ago." Called them again the next day and was told "We have received your payment and the account has been paid in full with no amount owed"

    Then, about a week ago, I receive a letter from a collection agency, looking to collect the already paid balance. I called the collection agency to find out what was going on here, and they said that "AT&T should not have accepted the payment" and "We have sent you numerous letters regarding this.", but they have no proof of any mailings.

  100. That's T-whatever for you, I'm afraid... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

    I live in Croatia - a country where T-Com is one of the most irritating monopolies.
    The behaviour you describe is, I'm afraid, nothing unusual for them.

    I moved away from their DSL service after I supposedly downloaded some 4 GB of data in one day, which was a bit more than double the free space on my hard drive at the time. Never even touched their mobile service.

    Actually, I hate them more then I hate Microsoft.

    </rant>

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  101. Tinfoil hat theory by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    or C.) The criminal mastermind using his phone is also monitoring his calls and disconnected him when he started talking to the T-mobile rep about what was happening.

  102. One thing to consider by mgerber · · Score: 1
    On some cell phone services (I don't know if T-Mobile is one of these), if Alice is on a call with Bob, gets a call from Carol via call waiting, and accepts it, then two things happen:
    1. The system is unable to properly record Carol's call. It shows up as "unknown" in Alice's phone's call log and may not show as an identified number on her bill.
    2. Alice will be double-billed for the time that she's talking with Carol, because Bob is still sitting there with his call "on hold" in the system. This should - should - stop if Bob hangs up.
    Check if this is a possibility. (The CSR should have checked too, but I'm not sure if front-line CSRs would know this.)
  103. Possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be possible that a second number got tied to your *account* somehow. My first suggestion was going to be look for overlaps. Now that you have found one, call customer service and (all sweetness and light) ask how such a thing could possibly happen? The best would be to pick a couple of fairly long overlaps: more than a few minutes becomes very hard to explain away (unless you make conference calls but in that case, they cannot both be inbound AFAIK). If the unknown calls are following a pattern, you could try ensuring that your phone is actually OFF during some of those times. If you can get a call (that's not just VM) when your phone is off, call the police as well. CS is going to hop to it a lot faster if you have a police incident#.

    Distinguish inbound vs outbound calls. A short inbound call could be a voice mail call.

    Finally, take one of your bills in and actually get someone to sit down and explain the bill to you (don't tell them what the bill means...ask leading questions..."so what does it mean when two calls overlap like this? I get charged for that? how long can a voice mail message be?"). Forcing them to go through the analytical process will probably lead them to the same "that's odd" moment that you had.

  104. This is almost EXACTLY how you should handle it. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    The most important part of his suggestion is that you list the symptoms of the problem and not try to convince them you know the cause. These billings systems are monstrously complex, and all sorts of things can go wrong. When you come with a proposed solution, not only are you mostly likely tediously wrong, but you sound like someone's who has come up with an angle to get yourself out of something you did instead of a genuinely puzzled customer who wants to know why this is happening to them.

    Calling up support determined that you have a particular problem is just as arrogant and futile for remedying your problem as doing the same with a doctor. You don't know as much as you think you know from reading junk online, and while you may be smart, you don't have the domain knowledge to get what's going on.

    (Also, SIM cloning is not your problem. You wouldn't be getting only calls meant for you while the "bad guy" only got calls meant for him. It doesn't work that way. It's also monstrously difficult to pull off at all with modern phones and royally screws with the switches if they are both used at the same time.)

    (Furthermore, as others have pointed out, overlaps of a single minute aren't uncommon thanks to the rounding up of time to next minute that most billing systems do.)

    Lastly, though, skip the last bit about complaining to regulators. They'll do nothing. The company will do nothing. All you'll get is elevated blood pressure. The correct procedure is to dispute individual records. Once the company has decided these are good or bad, that's pretty much your last court of appeal unless you want to spend a lot more money than $40.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  105. Cloning? by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    We called up T-mobile twice and claim the possibility of phone cloning.

    Not that I think Slashdot should become the point where people ask for advice on consumer complaints, but as long as you're asking, why don't you claim the far more likely possibility which is that T-Mobile simply screwed up on the billing. This kind of stuff happens a lot more than cloning. Or even better, don't claim the possibility of anything. Let them figure it out. Simply contest the calls. Talk to a supervisor. Get peoples names. If they're hanging up on you, there's a serious problem going on and you might need to write letters. But this is hardly News for Nerds. And it's only "Stuff that Matters" to you.

    1. Re:Cloning? by AliasN · · Score: 1

      I read "Ask Slashdot" for the comments, not the story.

  106. Overlap can be justified. by ebtebee · · Score: 1

    The overlap you are talking about can be justified if they say that the two calls were from the two lines you have. You can have overlapping calls if you have more than one line.

  107. Re:My "partner"? by ewhac · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Dear Assface,

    I have a partner as well. We are of opposite sex, so your jealous, vindictive, increasingly irrelevant $(GOD) should not be offended (perish the thought).

    People often mistake us for being married (must be something to do with how we interact). We are, however, not married. We can't go around calling each other husband and wife, because that would be misleading, since we're not married. Hence, we refer to each other as, "partners."

    In other words, the term "partner" is not exlcusively used to refer to same-sex relationships. In fact, from the context of the article, "partner" could even refer to a business relationship, rather than a personal one.

    Like most religious/Republican extremists, you are likely incapable of apology, regardless of how strongly it is merited. Absent such, self-immolation will do nicely. *plonk*

    Schwab

  108. Re:Partner? by SirCodeAlot · · Score: 1

    They're just mad because unlike 99% of this site his partner isn't a penguin..

  109. hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's hilarious.. I didn't catch the irony in that the first time around

  110. Hate to tell you... by joemawlma · · Score: 1

    But it's your significant other calling her other boyfriend and lying to you about it. She's good.

    1. Re:Hate to tell you... by joemawlma · · Score: 1

      REDUNDANT. and oops, I assumed wrong on the "her" and "she" part. Oh well. When will I learn to start searching before posting?

  111. Contact the Department of Homeland Insecurity by Auger+Duval · · Score: 1

    You might consider contact the FBI or HS. It is possible that you have been cloned, and more than likely not just to make calls to a DefCon f0n3 bridge. NBR Unavalable is usually a result of an international number.

    --
    --AD
  112. Re:My "partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you are funny. I hope some other mods can see it that way.

  113. The magic words to say by chiph · · Score: 1

    "I'd like to speak with your fraud department"

    The call-center operators are trained to immediately pass those calls on.

    My phone got cloned in the D.C. area several years ago -- over $500 of calls made to Canada by several someones. Once I got through to the fraud department at Sprint, they were able to get things straightened out and my account creditted. It helped that my phone was on & registered in North Carolina with their network at the same time the calls were being made from distant states.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:The magic words to say by josepha48 · · Score: 1

      Someone should mod your post up. It would seem to me that if a sprint phone could get cloned, then why not a tmobile number.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!
      Does slashdot hate my posts?

    2. Re:The magic words to say by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It would seem to me that if a sprint phone could get cloned, then why not a tmobile number.

      Because the technology is different. Some guy at the top of the thread explained what happens when you try and clone a GSM number.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:The magic words to say by chiph · · Score: 1

      Like Fulcrum of Evil says, the technology is different.

      However in my case, the phone was a dual digital/analog Motorola StarTac, and cloning a phone over the analog side is childs-play (I was roaming, and was unaware that the analog side was powered up). This isn't a problem (as much) anymore because most new phones are digital-only.

      Chip H.

  114. question about caller id by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

    is it possible for people to suppress caller ID for outgoing calls? and if so, why?

    by comparison, people who send email are forced to reveal their address, or are forced to forge them.

  115. cheating partner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the partner getting these calls on their phone at times when you are not with them?

    Just a thought, but sometimes the simplest explanations are the correct ones.

    It is very hard to clone a SIM enabled phone (which is what T-mobile uses)

  116. Really? The Better Business Bureau? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    In fact, I know right where I'd file (BBB) that complaint.

    I have two questions for you:

    1. Have you ever filed a BBB complaint?
    2. Before every purchase, do you look up the company's record at the BBB?

    The answer to both of these questions for almost everyone is "no".

    If you want to file a BBB complaint, expect to spend about 20 hours of your own time making sure that it gets put on their record. I've done it, and believe me - the onus is on you. Expect to have to make or take about 15 phone calls, send 2 or 3 FAXes and send 2 or 3 letters. Oh, and when the company replies that you're full of crap, you have 5 days to refute what they say - in writing. There's typically three ping-pong statements from both parties before anything gets put on the company's record. It takes months and it is not easy at all. One slip up, and the complaint is discarded and at best you start over from scratch.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  117. Overlapping minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T-Mobile and most other comapnies in the US, and in the US only, charge minue-by-minute rates. meaning... in that reference that you had... you might have started the call at 3:28:01, "01" being the seconds. When you eneded your call at 3:44:02, you have skipped into your 17th minute. and your next consecutive call starting at 3:44:03 onwards up until 3:45:00 will say you started at 3:44. Thus the overlap.

    To most T-mobile users, and many other cell users, when you drop a call, you quickly stumble to continue your call call. One you start the dialing... not once you connect like most imagine... once you press the dial button on your cell is when the mionutes start counting.

    This is the most possible and most valid solution. Phone cloning is possible, but given the strict procedure dictated by the towers, and the possibility of registering the phone on a remote tower owned by Cingluar for example, one of the clones will be shut off. Besides... testing by people who have made clones shows that both clones ring for an incomming call. multiple outgoing calls, from the same number are allowed though. But once detected by the terminals, the entire account is usually suspended.

    You shouldn't blame a company for lack of knowldge on you side.

  118. Unknown calls are bullshit by TibbonZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, so the phone company acts as if they don't know what the numbers are? I call bullshit. Do you think the list that they turn over to the NSA/CIA/FBI has 'unknown caller' written all over it? Fuck no it doesnt. It probably gives the phone number, account holders name and address of every call, if not far more.

    I really really hate it when companies play stupid. I lost a cell phone a while ago and went to the store. I wanted them to stop service on that line while I got another phone, and asked them if any calls had been made from the phone in the hours since I lost it. They said that they couldn't get those records. Fuck that. Say an FBI agent went into the store and needed the same information due to "Terrorisim". The information would be instant. I also asked if there was any way to guess what city the phone was in and if it was moving. They flatly responded no. (I had lost my phone in some cab I had taken that day, and if i knew what city it was in i could have called that cab company). I know that this is possible since they have been tracking down "crimials and terrorists" by using triangulation on their cell phones.

    I was a paying customer standing there and being lied to. I had another problem on a land line. I was getting calls from a fax line about 10 times per night from an 'unknown' number. I called the phone company several times. They said that since it was unknown number they couldn't do anything about it. I asked if they could block that number from calling me. Nope, since it was unknown. Now what if I had called the police/fbi and said that they last number that called my fax had sent terrorist threats, or maybe that it was a person talking about their jihad. The number could have been found out within minutes.

    So on your company, I also call bullshit. I am sure your records that they are turning over to big brother are accurate, and the ones they had you are probably not. Now let me go pack my things. I am sure that for thinking too much i'll be picked up any time now by the thought police.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by SuperRob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just one little problem with your hypotheses. You're going to a STORE for this information. If you want that data, you need to go past retail, past even customer service, and up the chain of command. The FBI would never start an investigation by requesting call records from a STORE.

    2. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by onepoint · · Score: 4, Informative

      net time you loose your phone, call the service department and tell them you lost your phone. they will pleasantly give you the location ( within 1 block ), the last 20 phone calls, and send that phone a text message. I've done this 3 times and got my phone back 3 times. it's all in the manner that you speak to the reps. also it does not hurt to keep your GPS active ( that helps pinpoint the phone to 1 block ).

      Onepoint.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    3. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is the bullshit. Unknown numbers happen all the time, it is not at all unusual for calls routed in by another network to be missing the originating number, especially if the call is coming from a wireline that is behind a PBX. If the FBI comes in to a store screaming about terrorism, (s)he will be referred to the law enforcement relations division, which will ensure the warrants are proper, and only then open a trouble ticket to have the records found.

    4. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are mistaken. Ever hear of a SS7 trap?

    5. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Heem · · Score: 1

      "I was getting calls from a fax line about 10 times per night from an 'unknown' number."

      Should have just put a dang fax machine there and found out a) what they were trying to fax, and b) most fax machines display their number in the upper margin of the page.

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    6. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 1

      You can refuse incoming calls that are number-blocked. I believe it is *82. This will disable blocked numbers from calling you on a land line. Perhaps it varies from city to city or company to company, but I haven't had a "courtesy" call since I did this.

    7. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Most fax machines but *A* number in the upper margin. That doesn't mean that it's THE number of the fax line.

    8. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Those services tend to be available on a state-by-state basis, and only if the state REQUIRES it to be available. For instance, in Illinois, it doesn't appear to be possible to have your phone default to blocking (you have to hit *67 to block for each call), in other states the phone company can charge you to have your line permanently blocked (and you hit *82 to allow it to go through). I haven't heard of a service which lets you persistently turn it on or off, nor to set your line to block incoming unidentified calls.

      SBC has a "Privacy Manager" service (which you have to pay for) which prevents Caller ID blocked calls from going through, instead asking them to identify themselves before your phone rings (and doesn't let them know if you simply weren't home, or declined to pick up the call). But you have to pay for that.

      Caller ID should have been implemented such that you can set it to be permanently blocked when you call, can set it to permanently block unidentified incoming calls, and intercept blocked calls with an option (for the caller) to allow their number to be transmitted. This should have been required by the FCC, and by now the extra charge for Caller ID should have been dropped (it's all built in to the switch anyway, doesn't save them any money to not transmit the info, all the equipment and such is already paid for). It also shouldn't be possible for the number to be spoofed in any way (or at least, in any deceptive or fraudulent way), or it should be illegal to do so for any reason.

    9. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Usually, in such a case, it is a legitimate fax where they accidentally put in the wrong number. I've forwarded such calls to a fax machine in the past, then contacted the sender to ask them to please quit doing that! Since the fax contained confidential information, they were quick to comply.

    10. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Elminst · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Call Rejection is actually *77 (*87 to turn it off).
      *82 is to unblock your callerid before a call if you have your own ID as private.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    11. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by ngrier · · Score: 1

      I know that my parents (in OR) have their caller ID info blocked at the line level. Similarly there are folks at the line level who insist you have caller ID turned on in order for the phone to ring. You simply have to redial the call prefacing with the unblock prefix in order for the call to go through. Similarly you can block caller ID on a per-call basis. (I am reminded of this every time I visit and try to borrow their phone only to be told that the number I've dialed requires the caller ID be turned on...)

      So it is possible - it just varies from provider to provider.

    12. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Yehooti · · Score: 1

      It's not as bad since the 'Do not call list', came into being, but it still bugs me. My approach was to set up vgetty to intercept all 'unknown' incoming calls. Scripted it to ignore any normal calls so I could pick them up or my answering machine would. Vgetty put the unknown caller through a maze of, "If you wish to speak with so-and-so, press 1, if you...". It ended up by hanging up after a long game of pushing numbers, but I don't recall anyone wanting to play the game.

      Probably wouldn't be motivated to set this up today because 'Do not call', takes out most of the aggravation. If you're getting bugged excessively though, it's worth a thought and it's free if you have a voice modem that works with vgetty (and use Linux).

    13. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, there are several circumstances under which an "unknown caller" or "out of area" message might appear on your display/bill. If the calling party is an inband originator (DTMF/MF or even, God forbid DP) hanging off a tandem, for instance, the call will be marked as "interworking encountered" in the IAM. As such, the CPN data cannot be verified and is treated as potentially erroneous, which causes it to be discarded and thus not displayed.

      Second, when the FBI needs subscriber records they don't generally visit a store:)

      Third, if you lost your mobile phone in a cab why did you go to a store to track it down? Furthermore, knowing the cab company why would you call them to track it down? I assume that you know your own mobile telephone number; you could simply call your mobile and when the cabbie answers request he hold it, bring it back to you once he has dropped off his current fare, etc... You'd have to pay the cab fare from where he is to where you are but big deal. You should also know that triangulating a lost phone doesn't happen, it is expensive and involved, while it could be done it would be a waste of money and manpower, buy a new phone.

      Fourth, your landline problem was handled correctly by the LEC, they are forbidden to block calls. While some features allow you to screen out unwanted callers by their subscriber number these measures are easily circumvented by a determined individual. If you want to block unknown or out of area calls simply subscribe to something like privacy manager, the calling party is forced to announce himself if they chose to block their ID or are calling from a line subject to interworking limitations.

      Fifth, the thought police are currently on strike, the "Grey Flu" as they call it, so you don't have to worry about them.

    14. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Mean+Ass+Troll · · Score: 1

      they are probably not lying.

      do you thik some 5.15 $ per hour schmoe working at a cellphone retail outlet has any access to data?
      or the operator of a telco?

      you might as well go ask the janitor, since they are union, probably make more, and would have far better access to such information.

      there is no possible reason a store cleark would be allowed near this info. 1 it would cost far to much to implement data services so widely 2 the risk of fraud, and 5.15$/ hr employees doing something wrong and profitable is far too great. and 3 the biggest reason of all.. wait for it... what possible motive does a company have in making this available on the level you want? just because it will make you happy? they dont give the faintest whiff of shit about you, your phone, or if it was stolen.

      do you honestly think that the NSA even talks to shitheads working in the telcos? no it goes more like this. NSA agent shows up at telcos executives house, and says, well shame what happened to those bozos at enron, all those skeletons in the closet gettin out like that. Telco executive cuts to the chase : can i help you. NSA now that you mentioned it , yes. we want complete phone records, conversations, everything, about everyone in the usa. executive amused: that sounds pretty difficult. what would you need all that for. NSA you know, everybody has skeletons in their closet. its not the skeletons that cause executives to goto prison, its the fact that their closet gets so full because they were not able to bury them in the backyard when nobody was looking. and after a few of them are dicovered it gains momentum, soon people are looking in every closet, and even digging up the backyard. when that happens it is far too late for the executive, because they are in night of the living dead, pirates of the carribean...

      telco executive; you are absolutely right, ill send a taskforce to your office tomorrow to work out this problem with skel... im mean national security.

      NSA : thank you for you help, you are a true american. shakes hand, exits.

    15. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I call bullshit:
      "'unknown caller' written all over it": outbound can be tracked. Inbound is another story; not all switches are 100% ss7 compatible. And yes; it does say "unknow caller". It all depends on the other carriers passing the info on so that SPC (store program control) can provide the information.

      ""I really really hate it when companies play stupid. I lost a cell phone a while ago and went to the store. I wanted them to stop service on that line while I got another phone, and asked them if any calls had been made from the phone in the hours since I lost it. They said that they couldn't get those records."

      Yeah; customer service cannot look up those records. The get the call logs off the switch and that happens monthly/weekly (depending on your phone company). It takes a technician to log into the switch and pull the records. Do you want to pay for the technicians time to get the work done? Remember; labor cost a chunk. What would be the difference if you got those numbers know or later? You would still get the numbers; and you can still dispute the calls.

      " Fuck that. Say an FBI agent went into the store and needed the same information due to "Terrorisim"
      For:
      1: I don't believe in all this invasion of privacy crap that get dished out by the government.
      2) Goevernment do get a priority when it comes to getting records; IE: bomb threat. Is your emergency that severe? Wasn't it a lost phone?

      "I know that this is possible since they have been tracking down "crimials and terrorists" by using triangulation on their cell phones."

      You lost your phone; do you really need to loacte the person and confront them; perhaps beat the crap out of them. Now doesn't this open the door for a lot of lawsuits? Have you ever thought that there is more to giving out this info in real time has other implications:
      1) Cost
        a) cost for man hours
        b) cost for network usage
        c) cost of additional revenue:
          c1) not doing new installs
          c2) not taking care of an outage where fines are imposed for down time.
      2) Potential cost of a confrontation: IE lawsuit for tracking down the person that has your cell.

      Did you ever realize that most people don't give out their real names on the phone where they are customer service. There have been several restraining orders against customers stalking telephone company personal. Why because some wack job customer had a crush on the voice on the other side of the phone. Now considering that the world isn't filled with rational people; perhaps that is the reason that companies don't provide real time access to certain pieces of information.

      On a side note; not releated. Look up TSP (Telecommunications Service Priority). Certains groups of people (gov, hospitals, etc) have priority routing of phone calls. Ever notice that there is a pretty large group of people that work for cities and states that win radio contests. Ok, it is one of my beefs.

      PS: I have worked in the industry for 15 plus years: MCI, AT&T, MFS, WorldCom, Ameritech and SBC.

    16. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a company doing VoIP. For various reasons, some of our calls terminate through a different provider than they originate through. Our termination service happily routes our calls no matter what the ANI/Caller ID is. One of the services we offer is Call Tunneling, where they call their number from a remote location, when it goes to Voicemail the hit # and enter their PIN, and they can choose to dial another number. Using this method forces the termination to go through our secondary provider, where we can send the ANI of the original call. They can also set up their number to block outgoing Caller ID, which then gets terminated through our secondary provider with no ANI at all. No phone company in the world would be able to know exactly where the call came from, only that it came from our network.
      Of course, we keep logs of all calls, so if someone with proper authorization wanted to know where the call came from, we could provide the information.

    17. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the phone company acts as if they don't know what the numbers are? I call bullshit. Do you think the list that they turn over to the NSA/CIA/FBI has 'unknown caller' written all over it? Fuck no it doesnt. It probably gives the phone number, account holders name and address of every call, if not far more.

      Actually, it does by law. Those records cannot be kept without a warrant. Nice try at inventing information to sound smart, though.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    18. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Jaazaniah · · Score: 1

      Right, so the 7 years of financial proof the business needs to keep (which include WHY the hell they charged Mr. X for 500 Cell Minutes) gets chucked by the servers maintaining the calls the moment the call ends? I don't think so. It's a billing issue. Live with it, it's saved.

      In the meantime the unknown numbers is probably more of a privacy issue - The common person shouldn't know that number if the other party didn't wish to share it. Most phone companies have a harassment policy you can activate, but they warn against doing so falsely as it could induce fines. So, you train your CSRs that if 'Unknown Number' is displayed that it's simply not available in the company. The law enforcement should* (until Bush and his NSA bullshit) need to send in warrants where the manager logs in, and rattles off the numbers, because they're logged for a reason. (Cell-activated explosives are not unheard of, and if it ever happens you want to know who the hell placed that call and from where!)

    19. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Not really from provider to provider, which was my point - it varies from state to state because they require providers in their state to provide such services. Other states don't, so the providers in that state don't.

      Yeah, some places you can get blocking on incoming blocked calls, but it sure would be more convenient if it allowed you to unblock your number at the point where it is intercepted, rather than make you re-dial the call. "This number doesn't accept calls with Caller ID blocked - please press the * key to allow your number to be sent, or hang up now."

    20. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have privacy rights too...sure they have access to the information, and unless you have a warrant (the FBI would need it to) to gather evidance without a warrent makes that evidance useless (if my Law and Order education serves right!).

      No one is completely anonymous with any information being sent. Divulging information to the wrong people is a big no no.

    21. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit by bareshiyth · · Score: 1
      I am sure that for thinking too much i'll be picked up any time now by the thought police.

      Methinks you flatter yourself too much.

      And, what's so interesting (like 5 points!) about rude crude ranting, and paranoia? Come on, moderators.

  119. Overlap by Joebert · · Score: 1
    '2/22 at 3:28 pm "NBR unavailable" 17mins usage. 2/22 at 3:44 pm "-(# I made)---" 3mins usage. So if you add up the time 3:28pm + 17 mins = 3:45 pm. The time when I made my call was at 3:44 pm. This reoccurs several times. I still do not think this is enough evidence to convince T-mobile of Phone Cloning. So I am thinking of switching either my number or my service provider. "

    I want to see an instance with a 2 or more minute overlap, the instance above could prove nothing but maybe funky billing practices.
    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  120. Re:the other man in his life by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > A woman named Cliff?

    Funny, but Cliff posted the message on the site, he wasn't the author. "2bepissedoff" is the person who wrote it.

  121. Re:Unknown calls are bullshit - a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be the Dream Police (TM Cheap Trick) are looking for you. :)

    Your helpful scared coward aiming to please again, and again, and ...

  122. Re:Similar problem = Cingular by taustin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Her response? "Computers don't make mistakes."

    "Yeah, that's why there's a multi-billion dollar a year industry to repair them."

  123. Re:"My Partner"? by Dahan · · Score: 0

    The same could be said for your post. We don't care what you think either, so why did you even post?

  124. Is this T-Mobile UK or USA? by theraz0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either way, unless someone got a hold of your SIM card and copied it, I doubt you have been cloned. And generally in cases like that, the usage is much higher or there is more substance other than some calls to and from an unavailable number. I'm not saying the truth isn't stated here, but I find it very hard to believe two times you have been hung up on unless you have been VERY abusive. I think the best thing to do here is have someone from T-Mobile investigate the issue for you. Call in again and tell them in a nice, concise way that you are seeing calls you don't believe you have made and would like to see them investigate it. I wouldn't mention cloning as I highly doubt this is the reason you are seeing this.

  125. Obvious joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should file a complaint about the BBB with the BBB.

  126. T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had exactly the same thing happen - a huge bill one month and a lot of calls that I hadn't made, including 5 (yes, five) 911 calls that I definitely didn't make.

    At the time I put it down to T-Mobile incompetence rather than anything sinister. Maybe I should be a little more suspicious - I don't know because they wouldn't take me seriously. After several futile calls to customer service, I am now a Cingular customer.

  127. No, Technology isn't magic. by GodInHell · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Your assumptions of the technological ommniscience of the phone companies is amusing, and baseless.

    First - there are legal barriers that allow you to strip a call of identifying headers. You can press a phone code to turn off your call id, and number forwarding, so that the recieving party cannot trace you. (in the u.s.) This was done so that victims of abuse could call home without fear of being traced. The phone company dosen't get that number either.

    Second - as any technologist could tell you, just because a system "should" work a certain way, dosen't mean that the programer who implemented it didn't hack together a fix overnight which worked, so it became a permanent part of the system.

    Third and Finally - Even though TV tells you that cell phone triangulation is a common practice, it's not. Triangulating on a cell phone call requires police, on foot, with three antennas, to find the right signal and take a measurement, from there they sit down with a map and work it out. This isn't built into the phone system, and its certainly not automatic. One reason for this is that one of the better ways to triangulate a signal is to measure the signal strength - if cell phone providers measured signal strength at all their towers consumer groups could gain access to those records durring the disclosure period of a civil suit to prove that large regions of their networks do not work sufficently.

    Remember, Technology /= Magic.

    -GiH

    1. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by PayPaI · · Score: 5, Informative
      You can press a phone code to turn off your call id, and number forwarding, so that the recieving party cannot trace you. (in the u.s.) This was done so that victims of abuse could call home without fear of being traced. The phone company dosen't get that number either.
      Lies. The company gets the number no matter what. CID blocking is just that: blocks anyone with "Caller ID" from getting your number. Anyone with ANI will still get it. Do you think that you could block CID when you call 911? "Sorry, we don't know where you are!"
    2. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by GodInHell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, you're right.. if you're calling a frigging 800 number!!! Moron. -GiH

    3. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by egburr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Even though TV tells you that cell phone triangulation is a common practice, it's not. Triangulating on a cell phone call requires police, on foot, with three antennas, to find the right signal and take a measurement, from there they sit down with a map and work it out. This isn't built into the phone system, and its certainly not automatic.

      Triangulation is difficult, as you describe. However, I have visited my local police communications center, and I can verify that they DO get the information about which cell tower your call goes through when you place a 911 call. Yeah, that only narrows it to a circle with about a six mile radius.

      It may not be as automatic if the police are tracking your phone around, but the technology is there. The cellular company should be able to identify the tower you're near if your phone is on, even if you're not using it right then. Over time, tracking your movement by cell tower, they should be able to get a decent idea of what road you're on.

      But, the people in the stores won't have access to that, and the regular customer support people won't have access to that. Some cellular companies are even providing phone tracking on the web as an extra-charge service for your kids' phones.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    4. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by CRC'99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Third and Finally - Even though TV tells you that cell phone triangulation is a common practice, it's not. Triangulating on a cell phone call requires police, on foot, with three antennas, to find the right signal and take a measurement, from there they sit down with a map and work it out. This isn't built into the phone system, and its certainly not automatic. One reason for this is that one of the better ways to triangulate a signal is to measure the signal strength - if cell phone providers measured signal strength at all their towers consumer groups could gain access to those records durring the disclosure period of a civil suit to prove that large regions of their networks do not work sufficently.

      Really? Wow. Thanks for telling me this. Nice to know it's complete rubbish. I work for a telco, and the guys across the dividers from us do live call tracing and mobile location all the time. It takes about 5-10 minutes and is usually accurate to within 200 metres. The neat part about GSM is that as your phone uses timeslots, the delay can be measured between your phone and the tower (like a ping). You then know how far away the phone is from the tower (because radio waves travel at a known speed). You phone is also always in contact with more than one cell station at a time. Add up all three factors (timeslow, delay, and different locations) and the system gives you a street name and approximate number.

      Of course, this is all done after a an official document comes through with what circumstances. Usually it's for people threatening suicide. Every now and again it's a kidnapping or something major. It's harsh on these guys when their call trace comes back too late and the news the next day shows that 2 kids were kidnapped by their dad and murdered. True story - give these guys some credit.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    5. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As a person who has a Class 5 switch literally about 50 feet away from me, I can tell anybody who is interested, that yes, the phone company can tell whomever calls who. In multiple places and on mulitple levels. Regardless of what keys are pressed to block...it really doesn't matter. We have to be able to for a multitude of reasons...most of which are financial.

    6. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is what i was trying to get at originally, when i was replying to GiH. thank you.

      i can't deal with people who don't *read* the Wikipedia articles i reference, and complain when i try to provide additional information. ... and then call me a troll because of it.

      yay /. !!

      ;)

    7. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by brokenin2 · · Score: 1
      Third and Finally - Even though TV tells you that cell phone triangulation is a common practice, it's not.

      Actually, it is. In the US now it's automated. The cell phone companies were required to do this to support 911 service. I've not read the technical details of it, but I do know that every 911 call can be traced to an exact address when it's made from a cell phone. Your actual location is what shows up on the dispatcher's screen, not the address your phone is registered to (unlike voip). I assume they use triangulation between towers, gps in the phone, or some combination of the two. I've actually heard that it's a combination (to increase accuracy), but I don't know how reliable the source of that information is.

    8. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Yakko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You most likely don't know your phone system well. There's NEVER a case where the phone company doesn't get your phone number and/or who called you. Billing would be sucktastic if the phone company ever didn't have the called and calling party numbers. They wouldn't know who to bill for the call!

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    9. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by caluml · · Score: 1

      I track my phone on my website.

    10. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Actually, I had installed some piece of software on my Nextel phone, provided by Nextel (before Nextel started to REALLY suck.)

          Using the GPS, it would (obviously) tell me where I was within a few feet.

          It also indiciated the name and coordinates (lat & long) of the tower my phone was talking to, as well as signal strength. I believe part of the 'name' of the tower was which array on that particular tower was receiving.

        I've read various specs saying cell phones peak power is between 250mw and 600mw. With the crappy little antenna on a cell phone, that's not much good for very far.

          Knowing the signal strength, and if the phone happens to switch towers (which happens all the time), you could isolate a user to 2 points (where the two circles indicating your approximate distance from a tower intersect).

          This can be further isolated if they can say which antenna array you were being received on. If I recall correctly there are typically three arrays on a cell tower, each covering 120 degrees.

          On this particular piece of software that I was using, it would show my history, as long as I had the application running.

          In a rather long and nasty call to Sprint once where I was arguing huge roaming charges, they named off dates, times, which towers I used, and what phone numbers I called. This was for an entire month. They *ARE* recording that data.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      They also wouldn't be able to bill for long distance!

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    12. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note, not every carrier uses phone-based location services, or even non-911 based location services. sure, some carriers do, and can trace locations, but just because you can and do do this doesn't mean that every network out there can.

      phase II (location based triangulation/gps coordination) 911 services are only required/implemented when a given county asks for it. if you live in a shit county with no 911 services, you may be years off from a gps-based wireless 911 solution.

    13. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
      Third and Finally - Even though TV tells you that cell phone triangulation is a common practice, it's not. Triangulating on a cell phone call requires police, on foot, with three antennas, to find the right signal and take a measurement, from there they sit down with a map and work it out.

      Uh, no. It's instant and automatic if you're in range of enough towers. My cousin is an emergency dispatcher, and he complains about cell phone calls from outside the city because he can't automatically get a fix on their location.

      Welcome to the 21st century.

    14. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      911 and other authorities do not get your number from CID or ANI. They get it from your BTN.
      ANI's or CID can be spoofed.
      Your BTN can not.
      BTN (Billed Telephone Number)

    15. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by HyperTiger · · Score: 1

      This is absolutely wrong on the Third point.

      Cell phone triangulation works not by signal strength and police running on foot. Triangulation (a wrong term to use here) works by using the differences of time the signal hits the cell phone towers (TDOA, or time difference of arrival) and calculating intersections of the hyperbolaes generated. Several cell towers are required to cooperate for this though.

      For technical reasons (bandwidth on many parts of the systems used), this cannot be done on every call, and is usually only done for 911 calls. In fact, there is an FCC requirement that this be done for all wireless 911 calls, and in the future there may be fines if this fails to happen.

      This is all automated for 911, however, and adding someone's phone number to be tracked is going to require a lot more than just escalating above customer service.

    16. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who worked at a large mobile company I can assure you they do have the information, not only the company but the end of the line customer service (via phone, *611 or other). In Canada we even offer you to view this information via web for a monthly fee of course ;) The information provided is a triangulation accurate within about 100m on a city map. This can be viewed at any time and is marketed for finding lost phones and teenagers. Oh ya, it is common practice, when you have a problem with your service a 'trouble ticket' is issued with a snapshot of your phone as the NOC see's it (including the towers which are servicing your phone at the time). Since they know where the towers are they know where you are, how long your call was, the strength of the signal in db and much more data.

      The last number to call you is availible to the rep as well even if it is 'blocked'. Don't forget this is the PHONE COMPANY if their system did not know your number they could not route your calls. The reason they do not give you this information when requested... there would be no reason to block the number in the first place, the phone company has no intrest in listening to some sob story just so they can get the number of the person who just called them (wether it is a crank call or otherwise) they would be flooded with calls from john smith saying its life or death that they get this data and they demand it!

      One thing I can attest to is customers lie just as much if not more then the reps ;) Most people feel that they overpay for their service and web sites have even been launched to give people hints on what to say that will give them freebies (complaing about service or phone and demanding compensation) even when the rep on the other end can see that your service has had no problems at all. So the reps become hardened to this and spew out the rieking policy happily when your child uses $500 in SMS on the phone you bought them for their birthday, or downloaded $400 worth of data while trying out the internet functions. The customer gets the standard line "sorry mr/mrs customer that is a valid charge".

      The police definately have a lot of access to records but they definately do not go through a customer service rep to get it. CS reps are hired to spew policy any real decisions are left to the guys who make more then $20/hr. CS is constantly reminded that most or all calls are recorded and not to make messups as far as crediting accounts above company guidelines then they show you the computer interface that does record all of your calls and the little old ladies (i'm not kidding) that review your calls.

      There is no magic, since as we know phone companies are watched by the gov they are subsidized for the systems they purchace to make them comply with federal standards, the governament wants all the data they can get.

    17. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by jaredcat · · Score: 4, Informative

      That isn't entirely true. I've worked in intercarrier billing for a little while, and I have seen many cases where ANI (Automatic Number ID) is not sent by the originating carrier.

      Now when you make a normal phone call from a normal world zone 1 LEC (local exchange carrier) to another world zone 1 LEC or wireless company, your LEC is almost always going to transmit that data. They don't have to do it, but they usually do it. Generally it makes it much easier for the techs and the billing people when things work this way because it lets you determine if a call is interstate/intrastate (different rate tables) or it can help you track down technical problems of all kinds.

      However, not every carrier sends this information. In fact, carriers with older or less complicated equipment (think phonecard companies and small international operators) sometimes can't even send ANI if they wanted to. Maybe they don't use SS7 and are using the ANI field to an identify an internal billing code. Maybe they have incompetant switch techs who don't know how to setup the signaling correctly. There are lots of legitimate reasons why a carrier would not send out ANI.

      Now for the criminals--- it is VERY EASY to spoof ANI and CLID. Many telecom scams are perpetrated this way. All it takes is for the criminal to be placing calls through a carrier which allows the customer to transmit digital signaling and then sends out whatever the customer sent to the next carrier rather than building ANI from the carrier's own customer database. Virtually all LECs let you do this if you have a T1 and a PBX. Virtually all small VoIP operators let you do this as well, so long as you have the ability to transmit the signaling to them.

      So getting back to the point, your carrier isn't neccesarily lying to you when they say you got a call from 'number unavailable'. Its entirely possible for a carrier NOT to get a call without an ANI. With a little research, they may be able to tell you what carrier the call originated from, but thats about it.

    18. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by avxo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Triangulating a mobile phone to within a couple of hundred meters (frequently less than that) does not require police on foot, with three antennas. The cellular system, in order to work and not for any sinister big-brother type reason, has to track the rough relative position of a subscriber within a cell, to account for signal delay propagation.

      Just to elaborate a bit about timeslots: The GSM standards require that the phone transmit only in a defined time frame: three time slots after the phone has received the data. This gives the tower a well-defined interval during which to receive the data transmitted and to ensure that transmissions by different phones are separated by at least one guard period.

      But as the distance between the tower and the cell increases, the cell phone must transmit earlier and earlier to account for the increase signal propagation delay. This process is called "adaptive frame alignment" and is determined by a parameter known as the "timing advance" parameter. The TA is dynamically updated and takes values between 0 and 63 inclusive. This parameter determines how early, in microseconds, the phone has to begin transmission, to ensure that the signal reaches the tower at the correct time, and roughly locates the phone within a specific radius around the tower.

      Combining this with the fact that more than one tower usually sees the phone and the information from those other towers, the GSM system can triangulate the signal to within a couple of hundred meters, easily.

    19. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1
      Third and Finally - Even though TV tells you that cell phone triangulation is a common practice, it's not. Triangulating on a cell phone call requires police, on foot, with three antennas, to find the right signal and take a measurement, from there they sit down with a map and work it out.

      Bullshit. Most criminals are caught after the crime has been committed, yet still their cellphone location data is used to prove they were in fact at the crimescene at the time the crime was comitted. So now you're telling me your police department has access to a time machine, so they can send 3 agents back in time to triangulate his signal? And no, I'm not referring to stuff I saw in TV shows.

      Policemen on foot, triangulating the signal, are only useful if you need to *catch* the man and need to pinpoint the criminal's location as he moves in realtime without having to rely on constant communication with the cellphone company. If you just need to know where he was on the night of October 8th at 11:25pm, a court order for the cell service provider to release those logs will suffice.

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    20. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yep, grandfather poster from me was an idiot. Triangulation is built into the core technologies - GSM, CDMA, etc. - in order to not flood the spectrum and allow more concurrent bandwidth use (or at least, that's my understanding).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    21. Re:No, Technology isn't magic. by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Triangulating a mobile phone to within a couple of hundred meters (frequently less than that) does not require police on foot, with three antennas.
      Not only that, but triangulation generally only requires two antennas, not three. Each (directional) antenna (and receiver) gives you the direction of the signal, and then you find where those two rays intersect, and that's where the transmitter is. And if the transmitter isn't moving, you can do it with one antenna -- just take a reading, then move somewhere else, and take another reading.


      Of course, in real life it's not quite that simple. Radio signals tend to bounce off of things like buildings, and so a given signal may appear to be coming from several directions. And when you get close to a signal, it's often hard to attenuate the signal enough so that your directional antenna and receiver can tell which direction has the strongest signal -- instead, they're all `off the chart'. But the ham radio guys do it all the time -- usually just for fun, but every once in a while they use it for something serious, like to find somebody who needs help or the source of some sort of interference.

      Now, you can also determine where something is by determining how far away it is by the strength of the signal from several locations, and under perfect conditions this would require three receivers to uniquely identify the location of the transmitter, but this is 1) generally less precise than what I described above, and 2) isn't even triangulation -- it's trilateration. (But then again, some people use the word triangulation to describe any sort of related activity.)

  128. Paying to receive calls by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Such a backward country.

    1. Re:Paying to receive calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. We drive on the wrong side of the road, too.

  129. Incorrectly linked numbers? by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

    About a year ago, I went through a situation with T-Mobile where, when I'd send a text message, it would appear to the recipient to come from another number. And, when the recipient would reply to my messages, sometimes even when the message actually appeared to come from my number, another person would get it. After text messaging and IM'ing with the other party involved, we found that T-Mobile had crossed our numbers somehow. We called T-Mobile and they straightened it out in about 30 minutes. Maybe the same thing has happened to you with regular voice calling? I'd call T-Mobile and have them investigate. Don't bring up ANYTHING you think it might be. Just tell them the situation and let them figure it out.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  130. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a simple solution to reps hanging up on me, I cancel my service. The problem could be a routing error at their end. I had a $50 phone call on my bill back in 80s. When I called to complain the rep tried to blow it off but I kept pushing. He finally took it off only because I didn't have a single call on any previous bill to Mexico but he was nasty about it and was convinced I was scamming them. They get a lot of bogus calls but they can't bill you for calls you didn't make or recieve. It's sleazy and don't let them get away with it. When in doubt they'd rather see you eat the calls than them.

  131. Jackasses should not be tolerated, ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every company should have a policy that if a jackass comes in yelling and being abusive, you get security to escort them out. If they repeat, you cancel their account and refund whatever was not used. Period. A company provides you with a service. They can refuse your business.

    If a customer comes in with a problem and asks for the manager, then no problem. But jackasses should not be tolerated. After all, 1 happy employee is worth 100 customers.

  132. Re:Partner? by weeboo0104 · · Score: 0

    We can not bother because it's irrelevant to the question. Ask Slashdot isn't really a forum on sexual choices.

    It might not belong on Ask Slashdot, but I think I have an idea for the next Slashdot Poll!

    I am currently dating;
    A. The opposite sex
    B. The same sex
    C. Cowboy Neil
    D. All of the above

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  133. How to prove it isn't you making the calls. by Mattness · · Score: 1

    Go to the bank and rent a safe deposit box. Call T-Mobile from the bank. State that you are about to prove that you aren't responsible for the calls. Ask for a case number/issue number some item to document the phone call has taken place. End the call and place the phone in the deposit box while in the presence of some official witness. Be sure to turn the phone off. Leave the bank, and wait 1 month for the bill. Then return to the bank, retrieve some record showing that the deposit box hasn't been opened and send a notorized copy of the record via certified mail to T-mobiles customer service division. Be sure to ask if they would like to reimburse you for the safe deposit box, the notory fee and the minutes stolen.

  134. Re:dealing with s..t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "deals with a lot of shit" could be a comment on sexual activity

    Since his mobile provider is T Mobile, a German company, I'd say it is a sure bet.

  135. Dump them by Tremo · · Score: 1

    You called to report suspected fraud, and your service provider's agents hung up on you? Man, I would switch providers that same day. Fuk them. You will need to change your number as well most likely to make sure the fraudster doesn't follow you to the new provider. I'd dump T-Mobile in a heartbeat with that kind of customer service. Since they are a GSM provider, all you'd have to do is unlock your phone, then you could use it on Cingular's network with a Cingular SIM.

  136. how to clone :) by dARKmIND · · Score: 1
    --
    dpanic (at) gmail (dot) com
  137. America's weird call-charging paradigm by Danj2k · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm just thankful I live in a country where people only get charged for the calls they actually make. I've never understood this idea of having to pay for incoming calls, and fortunately none of the telephone companies have been silly enough to try and introduce it over here in the UK.

    1. Re:America's weird call-charging paradigm by mimio · · Score: 1

      I also live IN AMERICA in a country where you only pay for your calls. Why should I pay for somebody else calls? What if is a wrong number?

  138. moron, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) i see nothing in the article you referenced to imply that *only* 800-number calls can be picked up, across the board. 2) Caller ID: "... This special code does not block the information from companies using Call capture technology ... Emergency services will most likely be able to show the restricted number using a service called Calling Line Identification Restriction Override (CLIRO), or by using general ANI services."

    the couple times i've been forced to call 911, they've certainly been able to locate me based on phone signal... and, well, i haven't got an 800-number, nor was i calling one.

    so, while technology may not be "magic" ... the idea that "CALLER ID BLOCKED" is a be-all and end-all statement isn't necessarily "moronic", either.

    1. Re:moron, eh? by cg0def · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes caller id blocking is only so that you the end user cannot see who's calling you but the point was that the guy went to the store and was pissed off that the people there couldn't help him. Those people really have no access to the caller ids and they really cannot do much as to finding your phone if it gets lost.

    2. Re:moron, eh? by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      1st ) I didn't reference wikipedia he (you?) did.

      2nd ) I said callerd ID and Number Forwarding - Number forwarding is what allows that number to be traced / appear on a bill. If it is disabled, a call can be traced back to the trunk of origin, and there logs are kept that can be dug up by the sending phone company, if the requestor has the legal athority to demand them.

      3rd ) the article referenced was not the one you just quoted (nice try) but rather it was This one. Which refers to the ANI system, which is limited to the 800 service and its children (888 etc).

      Troll often?

      -GiH

    3. Re:moron, eh? by Harik · · Score: 3, Informative

      So you're trying to tell me that phone companies blindy allow CLECS to send unknown calls into their system?

      Yup. Be nice though, he's probably just wrong, not trolling. Not too long ago, I would have argued the same, until I found out how to do it.

      ANI is spoofable on most switches. Trivially if you're using a digital service (ISDN or T1), less so on analog lines but still possible. Note that I'm not talking about Caller-ID here, but the ANI service that large T1/T3 customers get (NOT 800-only). The SS7 network is as badly designed as SMTP when it comes to spoofing.

      The issue is that it was designed to be spoofable for common applications such as forwarding, so that the original ANI was forwarded to the new destination, rather then getting a call from yourself/your company. Of course, there's no way to distinguish from a forwarded call and a new call, so effectivly you create a new call with bogus ANI and then patch it in to the inbound call.

      The other reason is DID lines need to be able to say what number is calling out. You could have hundreds or thousands of numbers all resolve to one trunk (Think any fortune-500 company), so it's the responsibility of the PBX to give the caller's ANI. As was pointed out on Schiner's blog, while you could filter ANI, the current software doesn't make it remotly practical to do so. So any DID line can spoof ANI.

      Whee!

  139. how to fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call care, record the rep's number (this will be the first thing they say to you). Explain that there is a problem - do not try to troubleshoot for them. They will most likely connect you to a technical services group that will examine the facts, and find the appropriate remedy. If the care rep hangs up on you, call again and report to a supervisor the rep's number and the time and date they hung up on you, we'll be out a rep by nightfall.

  140. This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I stick to tin cans and string!

  141. Run a Simple Test by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    So run a simple test. Take both you and your partner's phones, turn them off for 24 hours -- 48 would be better. Completely off, put away, untouched, no questions about it. You can live without your phones for 2 days. If these mysterious calls come more often on some days than others, choose those days.

    Now if you're charged for incoming calls during this period, raise holy hell, and include your state telephone regulators in it.

    But don't trust anyone else's word no matter how well you think you know them. Lock up the phones completely and see what happens.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  142. Re:"My Partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, which commandment is being broken?

    "I'm interested in selling my youngest daughter into slavery as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. She's a Georgetown sophomore, speaks fluent Italian, always cleaned the table when it was her turn. What would a good price for her be?"

    "Does the whole town really have to be together to stone my brother, John, for planting different crops side by side? Can I burn my mother in a small family gathering for wearing garments made from two different threads?"

    "My chief of staff, insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly says he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself or is it okay to call the police?"

    - Aaron Sorkin, Anonymous and others / The West Wing / Episode "The Midterms"

  143. Re:My "partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Schwab,

    Your bias is screaming through your post. We get it, you feel scourned and judged by the world. Great way to deal with that by stereotyping those who you wish to pin the blame on. The AC that posted the completely immature and bigoted response is just an unintelligent person who has an inability to express a meaningful value to connect with his or her feelings. This could have come from a liberal, a conservative or someone anywhere in between. Hate is not a conservative versus liberal issue but a human issue. I would challenge you to consider your own response and ask if your bias against a portion of society was any less hateful. Tolerance does not have to equal acceptance, but it does involve respect and decency.

  144. Why can't we mod stories down? by db32 · · Score: 1

    I even have modpoints...seriously...what is this about? "Help me, my phone bill looks funny and my partner says they don't know" Uhm...so call the phone company, act rational, tell them common sense things like "block this" or "I didn't make these calls" and don't go on strange tyraids about cell phone cloning to people who probably have little understanding of what you are even talking about.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  145. SAME THING HAPPENED TO ME by manta26 · · Score: 1

    About a year ago I purchased a T-Mobile phone from A1wireless.com. I had problems with the 1st unit and had it exchanged through the online vendor. I believe it was after I received the replacement that I notice phone call from Alabama and other states that I have never been to and where I don't know anyone. Hundreds of minutes of phone calls were being billed to my account that I did not make. I also getting billed for text messages and tons of 411 calls ($1.25 ea). It took months to resolve the issue. I changed my sim card multiple times (didn't help anything), I spent hours on the phone w/ T-Mobile. All I ever heard was that the calls were coming from my sim card thus they were valid calls that I had to pay for. I showed proof that 2 calls took place at the same time so it obviously wasn't me making the calls. T- Mobile can tell what type of phone the calls are coming from so you can ask that. Also when I logged into my account online it would show the other person's phone. After many, many hours of phone calls, and letters written to corporate nothing was really resolved. All I ever heard was that my situation was "impossible" therefore it was not happening. The most they did for me was to change my plan and backdate it so I did not have overages. After a month it did stop and I'm not sure how it got resolved, But I will suggest this... I received phone calls from the friends of the person who's calls I was being billed for. I talked to her friends and they gave me her name and phone number. I gave this information to T-Mobile and of course they did nothing. Eventually, I just started calling her saying that I was receiving her calls and text messages. I told her to call T-Mobile and explain it to them. I assume she contacted T-mobile and the situation was resolved b/c soon after it stopped. My experience w/ the situation was very stressful and the customer service reps were rude and dishonest. I stayed w/ T-mobile b/c I bought a phone w/ the condition that I would get a 100% rebate if I kept the service for 6 months. My contract is up in July and most likely I will change service providers. Good Luck with everything...

  146. HLR can only have one VLR profile for your sim by Kodack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay so in answer to the posters question:

    When you power your mobile on it attatches to the network and is added to the local switches VLR (visitor location register) which is a database of who is on what switch and what radio and base station they are on. The MSC (mobile switching center) then sends a request to the HLR (home location register) which is like a VLR except instead of tracking what radio they are on, it tracks which MSC they are on. So if someone calls your phone, the system does an HLR lookup to see what MSC you are on, and then the call is sent to your current location.

    If someone were cloning this persons mobile then they would be attatched to the network 'twice'. This is not allowed and it would cause the 2nd mobile to be unable to attatch to the network.

    Think of it like this, your SIM card contains an IMSI (international mobile subscriber identifier) which is a long number that corresponds to your account. When you are attatched to the network it is by SIM/IMSI and the HLR notes which VLR you are in. If a 2nd phone tried to attatch with the same SIM/IMSI information then one of two things would happen because someone can't be in two VLR's at the same time. Either the new SIM would be rejected because the old one did not do a handover to the new VLR. Or the old SIM would be removed from it's current VLR and attempt to re-attach, which would kick off the other SIM/IMSI back and forth.

    So if you leave your mobile powered up 24x7 your making it very difficult for someone else to get on the same network and pretend to be you because you can't be in two places at once. And as long as your sim is inserted and your phone is powered on you are attatched to the network, whether you make a call or not.

    If you are still concerned have Tmobile set up a call trace on one of these calls or check the IMEI of the calling phone. IF it's in Europe they will have an EIR which keeps track of the IMEI (international mobile equipment identifier) which is like a serial number for the phone. Even if someone cloned your SIM they can't clone your IMEI so it will be different.

    With a call trace they can track the LAC and CellID of anycall placed and tell you where it's originating.

  147. YOU'RE PARTER IS SLEEPING AROUND by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

    Duh.

  148. Impossible! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    "Both representatives hung up on me, thinking I was trying to con them or something.". That's impossible! T-Mobile has won the JD Power & Associate award for customer service. They told me this themselves right before they terminated my call.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  149. bad cutomer service by Adkron · · Score: 1

    I would tell t-mobile that I'm leaving their service for a different company. If I ever call customer service and they hang up on me I don't want to deal with that company.

    --
    The greatest of all weaknesses is the fear of appearing weak. ->JB Bossuet, Politics from Holy Writ. 1709
  150. people skills by cg0def · · Score: 1

    Man if you had 2 reps hang up on you then you are either trying really hard to convince them of something that even you are not sure of or you desperatelly need to work on your people skills. Anyway, like several people said it is very hard to clone a gsm phone and this is most likelly not the case. Make sure that you can really trust that your partner did not make those calls before blaming them on some insane idea like cloning. Also when you talk to the reps it usually works best if you restrain yourself from trying to tell them what to do. Yes there are some morons working as reps but most know what they are doing pretty well and would help you. Also if it does turn out that someone else is using your account then the reps will know exactly what to do and they might also help you get you rmoney and minutes back. But like I said good people skills is the key ...

  151. Maybe because you are ass-u-me-ing by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe your assumption about spades is wrong. Maybe you are jumping to conclusions and ought to see if there is a cliff in that direction first. Or a brick wall.

    Is your real name Wily E. Coyote?

  152. Something's fishy... by Excelsior · · Score: 1
    Of course, I have a family plan (2 people only, 2 lines) and I talked to my partner. The answer: he too had not received any of these calls, especially over 300 minutes per month of them.


    "No, honey. I have no idea what these anonymous inbound calls to my cell phone could be."

    Doesn't sound to me like T-Mobile is necessarily the cheat here.
  153. Re:"My Partner"? by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1

    touche`

  154. Re:Rule #2 by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

    You do NOT post on Slashdot about Project Mayhem!

  155. Re:"My Partner"? by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1

    great ep!

  156. uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your boyfriend is cheating on you....

  157. Re:"My Partner"? by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1

    the flannel, waxing kind ;)

  158. Re:My "partner"? by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 1

    I'm not a "fag", but Alan Turing was.

    As far as *I* am concerned, you mess with them, you mess with me.

    Hey, summer is here. Why not get drunk and play with fireworks instead of posting on /.?

  159. Been missing calls? by jgoemat · · Score: 1
    First, there's always a remote possibility of a billing mixup. That's unlikely though.

    I notice you say you've noticed only incoming calls. If someone dialed your number and your phone was on, they would normally get you. Have you had anyone tell you they tried to call you when you know your phone was on and not get through, or get hung up on by someone? Can you call TMobile and get a detailed report of calls on your account? That might show which number (you or your partner's) was being called. They may also be able to show you which cell tower the phone was registered with for the start and end of the call.

    If they are all calls to your partner's number, I would look seriously at him cheating on you. Have you noticed him taking many private calls lately and moving away from you to talk? Have you answered your home phone to have people hanging up or claiming they got the wrong number? Has he been working out more or taking a greater than normal interest in his own appearance?

    If you're worried about cloning, you don't need to just change your number, but get a different SIM card from your phone. That card is what would be cloned and has an IMSI number that is used to register you on the network.

  160. dump tmobile by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1

    they suck, my phone was stolen and there were dozens of calls made from it to Mexico AFTER I reported it stolen to them. they wouldn't take them off the bill, so I refused to pay what I didn't owe and got a another phone from another provider and moved my wifes phone service as well. ~$50 US cost them 2 customers that were with them for 10 years!

  161. offtopic, but by matt328 · · Score: 1

    I especially enjoy the tags for this article. yes, cellphones, fraud, no. Why don't we get a little more descriptive with tags like story, slashdot, group of words, stuff.

    --
    Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
  162. Change the SIM! by netik · · Score: 1

    If you're on tMobile, tell them that you're getting "Unable to read SIM card" messages on your phone and that you need a new SIM, which they will gladly send you free of charge.

    Then your phone's identity will change when you replace the SIM, and you can have some peace of mind, enh?

  163. Re:My "partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, now go screw your partner in the ass you fairy

  164. Here's a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Here's some advice: Don't take that shit.

    That 'shit' comes from the agent taking calls from dozens of people a day, and though the GP might be telling the truth a lot of people are playing dumb and trying to get out of paying their bill..

    >You're a human being. But more importantly, you're a paying customer. Call them up, get the guy's name. Inform him that if he hangs up, you'll contact his supervisor. Then ask him what zip code these calls were made from, they should be able to figure that out. Verify that it's something reasonable.

    Ah, the paying customer. The bane of a call center agent's life. The agent is a human being as well, please remember that.
    Here's a better plan of action:
    1) Speak to them nicely but firmly. If you don't get anywhere then stop and consider that they actually cannot help you with your request. Call center agents can NOT see blocked numbers. If the call center agent asks their supervisor or a tech agent for help, those people will tell the agent that the billing system sees what they see. In short, there is no way to see incoming numbers are because they are not recorded by the billing system.

    2) If you believe you are getting stonewalled or are asking for consideration beyond what the agent is apparently allowed to give, ask for a supervisor. Polietly but firmly. Repeatedly. If they hang up on you, then you call back and ask the next guy for a supervisor right away. Tell the supervisor about the hangup. The agent will be reprimanded.

    3) Keep going upwards if you aren't satisfied. The farther up you go the less the person will want to talk to you. Noone above the customer service agent wants to be on the phone because they have a LOT of other stuff to do..

    I am not sure how you think that they can give you the zip code the caller was in.
    BTW They don't care that you say that you don't know someone in Houston. From our point of view, your phone talked to a phone in Houston regardless of who was operating either of the phones.

    >If that doesn't work, simply demand they change your number for you.

    Try just asking if they will change your number. Then ask them if they will waive the fee because of the harassment/billing error/whatever.

    >If they refuse to do that, be sure to inform them where you're taking your business.

    Now, the agent has to respond to your threat to cancel, and if you go up to a supervisor that's pretty much the go phrase for giving you the moon, but the agent doesn't personally give a damn where your business goes. It's not going to open up information to them that they don't have.

    Now, I must say that if you politely bring up the fact that you're willing to cancel your service over the matter, you might get some consideration on refunding fees. This is, of course, if you're actually a customer they make money off of. Don't try this with your $10/mo plan. Oh, and if you don't get anywhere after mentioning the cancel (magic words for the QA team watching the rep) then they really can't help you out.

    >Personally, I'd be pretty damned pissed if anyone ever hung up on me when I was simply inquiring as to why they were charging me money. In fact, I know right where I'd file that complaint.

    I'll tell you where you can file that complaint, too.
    If they hung up on you they are either a crappy agent, having a bad day, or are really offended by your conduct. In any of these cases you're probably not going to get anywhere further with them so ending the call isn't the end of the world. Remember: you can call back.
    ---

    Having been a call center agent for AT&T wireless, I have a better idea of how to deal with cellular agents:

    1. be polite but firm
    2. if the agent is an idiot (hey, some are) hang up and try your luck again. The hold will give you a breather and the new agent might be one of the good ones.
    3. ask for the supervisor. There are multiple, and the first 'supervisor' you get will likely just be another agent. Try th

  165. Dont Pay that bill! by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Call them back, demand that they remove the charges...its that simple. If they indeed have no idea who called, and they can't prove you received the calls...then they cannot charge you for them.

  166. Interference by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1
    I don't know much about the shielding on instruments and cables on aircraft but I do know that my cell phone interferes with my alarm clock . I live on the border of cell service where my phone is always hunting for an analog or digital signal. I had to put my cell on the opposite side of the room as my cell because the cell ping pushes noise through my alarm clock's speaker.

    My cell is a Samsung A650, the alarm clock is a Sony ICF-0240.

    I've also watched my friend's nextel interfere with his CRT (back in ~2000). It was really bad.

    Radio waves affect instrumentation. In a 1998 Honda Civic, the CB (admittedly a little more powerful) we installed caused the speedometer to go haywire and activated the SRS warn light on the dash.

    While I think aircraft could be somewhat more immune because of shielding etc, I'm certain that Radio waves aren't totally harmless. This is all anecdotal so take it for what you think it's worth.

  167. Change Carriers. by Harik · · Score: 1

    It's a fairly common T-Mobile scam, and their reps are trained to do exactly that: Ignore you or argue with you. My neighbor ended up arguing with them long enough to raise her blood pressure to the point of bursting a blood vessel in her eye. Never did get them to deal with the charge, either.

    They'll get busted for it eventually, until then, just vote with your wallet.

  168. Welcome to Cell Phone Billing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you add up the time 3:28pm + 17 mins = 3:45 pm. The time when I made my call was at 3:44 pm. This reoccurs several times. I still do not think this is enough evidence to convince T-mobile of Phone Cloning. So I am thinking of switching either my number or my service provider.
    Call made at 3:28:01, lasts 16m 1s, ends at 3:44:02, gets billed as 17 mins, as most cell carriers round incomplete minutes up.
    Call made at 3:44:30.

    Your bill would say 3:28pm 17 mins, 3:44 3 mins, but you're failing to observe that those are APPROXIMATIONS. Unless of course you only dial phone numbers at the top of each minute, and every conversation you engage in happens to last multiples of 60 seconds.

    More often than not, people forget they called someone or got called by someone, or they don't lock their keys on their phones, or the partner on the plan knows full well about the calls but LIES about it. Having worked (thank God it's past tense) in billing for a wireless provider I've heard it all.

    I won't claim it's not possible for your phone to be cloned, but it's unlikely that that is the case. It's far more likely that there's a problem either with you phone itself, your memory, or your partner's honesty.

  169. Might be a Call Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be a con Call Forwarding in action.

    I've seen this before: con men call you up and tell you to call a certain number that just happens to begin with the Call Forwarding code (here it is *72). Usually they claim someone you know is hospitalized and to get more info call the "hospital" at the number they give you...

    Then they can use your phone to get to that number: they just call you (presumably the NBR Unknown calls you don't see) and get forwarded to the new number, with you paying the cost of connecting from your phone to that number.

    Make sure you disable all Call Forwarding on your line.

  170. It's NOT just you by Builder · · Score: 1

    I have one simple rule when dealing with people - be nice. Be nice for as long as you possibly can. Then lose your shit in the most public, noisy and abusive way that you can. Two spectacular incidents that happened recently are on my blog at http://anonymouslemming.blogspot.com/2006/05/ghost -of-customer-service-past.html

    I don't want to have to flip out just to get someone to do their job, and it creates more stress than I need. If everyone just did their job right, the world would be a much happier, less stressed place. It's the age old story of a few people ruining it for everyone :(

  171. This is probably not cloning .... by Terranaut · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile does not own the network that it uses for wireless communications.

    I'm not sure whose network it uses, but this scenario is very similar to one that my wife experienced a couple of months back. She was recieving text messages from a video rental store that she was late returning videos, but she / we don't have an account there. By chance, when she called the store to complain, the person who had been late returning walked in to the store. It turns out that he had recently purchased a Virgin Mobile cell phone (which leases bandwidth from Sprint / Nextel), and we have Sprint phones.

    When she contacted Sprint customer service (and much to her surprise got a real American), he comfirmed that this is an issue, and credited our account for the services the Virgin Mobile customer subscribed to and some more for her inconvience.

  172. Re:Yes, "partner." now fuck off, straight boy. by d723 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would you refer to your wife as "the woman whose pussy I pump?" "The bitch that sucks my cock?" If so you need to lay off the porn, dude. Not sure where you picked up all that gay stuff, but you've obviously given it some thought or been hitting the gay porn. Usually people leave verbose descriptions of the actual physical methods of their lovemaking out of whatever pronoun reference they use.

    The thing is, you don't get to decide what word other people use to describe their relationships. They do. You opinion matter none. If you'd like them to respect your own chosen term and not vomit profanities all over you each time you mention your relationships, then you need to provide others the same courtesy. The only thing that can cause that kind of response is fear. What are you afraid of Mr. Anonymous? Afraid some guy will try and suck your cock or afraid you'll like it?

    Oh and by the way Mr. I-feel-so-strongly-about-this-that-i-will-remain-a n-anonymous-coward, Homosexual sex is natural and normal., not to mention fun. Not everybody does it, but ... well you sound like you could use some.

    Male big horn sheep live in what are often called "homosexual societies." They bond through genital licking and anal intercourse, which often ends in ejaculation. If a male sheep chooses to not have gay sex, it becomes a social outcast. Ironically, scientists call such straight-laced males "effeminate."

    Giraffes have all-male orgies. So do bottlenose dolphins, killer whales, gray whales, and West Indian manatees. Japanese macaques, on the other hand, are ardent lesbians; the females enthusiastically mount each other. Bonobos, one of our closest primate relatives, are similar, except that their lesbian sexual encounters occur every two hours. Male bonobos engage in "penis fencing," which leads, surprisingly enough, to ejaculation. They also give each other genital massages.
  173. Obviously not a clone by bryz · · Score: 1

    It's obviously not a clone issue. Even if this sim card was Cloned, it would still receive the "unknown nbr" calls. In addition, the bill would probably have other unknown outgoing calls and the user would have several random incoming calls.

    Seeing how this person has acted by posting his wild speculations on the Web, I wouldn't be surprised if T-Mobile did hang up. Sounds like someone got a bill that was a little higher than expected, ACTUALLY Looked at the bill for the first time, saw "unknown nbr" and therefor assumed that there was a cloned sim card. Plus there's the probability of the "partner" who may be wise and has someone calling in with caller id restricted. And the overlapping minutes is just ridiculous. If you get a call in on call waiting, you'll have overlapping minutes.

    This is something that T-Mobile will unfortunately have to deal with. I can't believe that slashdot posted this to the front page. I'm not impressed.

  174. Re:My "partner"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. What a massively stupid way to drive the entire thing 100% off subject into a moronic discussion of the usage of the word "partner" when it doesn't even matter. Kudos on managing to not just be offtopic, but, an incredible troll. Next time log in, you should be proud of this amazing ability. None of the rest of us could pull of such an incredibly stupid post.

  175. They round call times up you know. by Nazo-San · · Score: 1

    Sorry if someone already posted this, but, it has turned into 5 pages of people war mongering about how much they hate/love homosexuals.

    Your "17 minutes" might actually be 16.1 minutes. This is because they get less money if they don't do that. (Plain and simple, that's all it is.) They always round anything they can up. In other words, to ensure overlap, you will have to find an occasion in which even accounting for rounding up (and they always round up, not down) on both ends, the times do still overlap. I know this for a fact from personal experience because I don't use the cell phone much and most of my calls consist of "ok, I'm in front of the store. What was the name of the color paint you wanted? Ok, got it. Bye." Actual call time: in the area of 15 seconds. Call time on bill: 1 minute.

    So, your bill MIGHT be more accurately represented as, say (just an example):
    2/22 at 3:28.0 pm "NBR unavailable" 16.1 mins usage, round up to 17 on final bill.
    2/22 at 3:44.9 pm "123-4567" 2.1 mins usage, round up to 3 on final bill.

    In fact, it looks like it could possibly be that NBR unavailable might have even cut out just as you picked up the phone. My first thought would be that maybe it's related to those thoughts of a P2P network on mobiles. If someone could contact your phone and use it while it is idle, then they would possibly be cut off the moment you hit the send button. This is just a thought though. I don't actually have any idea what is actually causing it, and it may be that those two even do overlap, we just can't tell from that is all.

    Whatever this is, it is strange though, and I hope you do figure it out.

  176. In simple answer, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can "clone" your phone number but not the phone. It is more likely they "stole" your phone number and used it to call people in your stead. T-Mobile is being a pain when they are not allowing to dispute these calls and charges. This is an serious breach of security on their part where they are allowing an "clone" to make or receive calls and there is no accountiblity in their system for which check for the correct number to correct device. It would be great if this was true and NSA had false records so they didn't track your calls correctly but you are paying for these fake calls.
    IMHO I would get out of T-Mobile to another service.

  177. Re:Partner? by fruitbane · · Score: 1

    I don't really know. I'm not sure I'm qualified to discern the difference.

  178. I think you used to be able to.. by swmccracken · · Score: 1

    Well, actually, you can, or at least could. Sort of. There was a weakeness in the encyrption algorithms of the older SIM cards that let you recover exactly that - the Ki value. As I understood the attack, it involved putting the SIM in a smart card reader and subjecting it to about half an hour's worth of continiuous querying.

    I think there was some way you could work out the Ki by sending challange after challange and analysing the responses it gave.

    I'd recommend reading this and the subsequent updates linked to from there. Yes, it is from 1998, and I'm hoping that modern SIM cards are more difficult (impossible?) to clone.

    It's also possible there are countermeasures too these days built into the SIMs - as you point out, they are active devices.

  179. Re:It's NOT just you - reply/warning/rant by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    I have one simple rule when dealing with people - be nice. Be nice for as long as you possibly can. Then lose your shit in the most public, noisy and abusive way that you can.

    That won't work in this post-9/11 world....

    That kind of behavior will get you waylaid by the CSR/manager while they call the cops to come arrest you.

    You forget government is the puppet of 'big' business -- who do you think REALLY supplies government with the ca$h needed to operate? It certainly isn't Joe Public, he doesn't have enough money to 'talk' loudly enough to get himself heard like the fatcat businessmen have at the corporate level.

    That's why America's bipartisan political system is basically 'two sides of the same coin': Big business is ALWAYS in control!

    I saw on MSN today that US AG Gonzales is crowing about 'nailing' some potential terrorists trying to 'bring down' the Sears Tower and what not. Come on -- another 9/11-style attack is old news -- the terrorists are REALLY JONESING on making THE SUM OF ALL FEARS a reality! all they need is a 'nuclear state' (such as North Korea) who is sympathetic to their cause to give them a nuke to float into a famous seaside harbor in the USA like LA, NY, or Miami with the expected , cataclysmic results. As far as I know, there is too much cargo to check to find the bomb before it does it's 'nuclear thing'. Another possibility would be to sneak it over the Canadian/US border out west where there are NO guards or fences to get past--just a 'cleared path' marking the border between the two countries!

    The best thing to do is to give the oil rich states a fair price for their natural resource instead of trying to 'rip them off' by de-stabilizing their government then moving in with military force to occupy them. A 'Golden Rule' style U.S. foreign policy would have likely prevented 9/11...

  180. Re:Yes, "partner." now fuck off, straight boy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Would you refer to your wife as "the woman whose pussy I pump?" "The bitch that sucks my cock?"
    No, not again. Once was enough to teach me that lesson.
  181. Re:My "partner"? by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

    You do of course realize that there are non God believers who think homosexuality is stupid and make sport of the fairier sex? (fairier, lmao, I made a funny) Nice knee jerk, there, one dimensional thinking turd. (I can't believe I just flamed on /. but I had to do it)

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  182. Re:Yes, "partner." now fuck off, straight boy. by HeroreV · · Score: 1

    You know what else lots of animals do? They run around naked. They eat other animals raw. They piss wherever they happen to be standing. They have sex in public. It would not be considered natural and normal for a human to do any of this.

    I am gay myself and I am sick of hearing that homosexuality is good or bad because it is natural or unnatural.

    Hurricanes, earthquakes, cancer, miscarriages, and a trillion other terrible things are completely natural. Clothing, roads, buildings, medicine, and a trillion other wonderful things are completely unnatural.

    Homosexuality being good, bad, or neutral has nothing to do with how natural it is.

  183. Re:"My Partner"? by HeroreV · · Score: 1

    You must be a fan of Hitler.

  184. T-Mobile Bills by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    I had them bill me for $1700 in one month!! It was more them 24 Hour of use for more then 30 days worth of minutes, they refued to even disuss it with me and sent it strait to collections before the bill was even due because I verbablly refused to pay it!!

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
  185. Another possibility... by mbreuer · · Score: 1

    Your future self may be using the phone after the discovery of time travel. You need to get a patent!

  186. ...unless it is sufficiently advanced n/m by oSand · · Score: 1

    No message. No message. No message

  187. I am an elistist asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Slashdot. I'm a typical computer geek. I can't talk to anyone without coming off as a know it all asshole. When I'm telling a help desk that I know exactly what has happened to my phone they hang up on me. I don't understand why they would do that. I only tell them that they are stupid and I know everything. Please help me how do I deal with the people who don't understand everything I do?

  188. Cell towers cost over $100,000 a tower by trigggl · · Score: 1
    Think about it. What do you think takes more power, sending information over a wire or transmitting by radio?

    I use my cell more than my land line and I pay less for the cell.

    Why do you have to pay extra for calling someone on their mobile phone instead of on their land line? Seems a bit of a rip off to me.
    Maybe I don't understand the question. Is this a response to someone? I've never heard of someone paying more for a call on the basis of the recipient being on a cell. Is that what you actually meant?
    --
    Ops, I shuld have usd the prevuwe but in.
    1. Re:Cell towers cost over $100,000 a tower by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of someone paying more for a call on the basis of the recipient being on a cell

      Happens in the UK, and AFAIK most of Europe.

      But in the UK, cellphone numbers always start with 07 so the caller knows in advance that they're calling a cellphone - AIUI that's not the case in the US.

  189. Re:My "partner"? by r00t · · Score: 1

    Eeeeeeeeeeew!!!! :-)

    It's crazy sharing property with someone you aren't married to, unless you do it via shares in some sort of corporation.

  190. Sue by omb · · Score: 1

    I have now heard enough comments on the mis-behavior of many
    large company SUPPORT and HELP-CENTRES, the solution is to issue
    the writ, in local court first.

    No call centre guy wants to responsible for his company failing
    to answer a writ!

  191. after the fact auditing by DM9290 · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. Most run of the mill fraud is detectable with after the fact auditing. And certainly many kinds of telephone network fraud imaginable could be detected that way. In my experience such fraud detection is not given a very high priority even AFTER the fact. And much of the fraud looked for is only the kind of fraud that the people involved have dreamed up themselves. Often the best developers are needed to implement new features without causing the entire system to fall apart, so it is the developers who are more prone to write buggy code which are involved in writing auditing code. These guys were less involved in the system design however, and are less qualified to even know what is and what is not fraud. The internal politics and psychology of a telco make fraud detection fairly expensive compared to the actual amount of fraud. (this however minimizes the cost of making carrying live phone traffic). Lately there has been so much emphasis on downsizing and/or merger as well that the problem is compounded; the departments that are usually first on the chooping block are the non-revenue centers. i.e. auditing.

    We are really only concerned with large scale and cost-effective to prevent fraud. Something akin to the easily defeatable copyprotection schemes on some CDs (which really only stop casual copying). And I suspect most companies are like that. Consequently.. if you complain that a phone call you made never happened or was of a much shorter duration.. we are most likely to simply take your word for it, make a note and delete the call. Hell.. we know there are bugs in some of the 3rd party technology we use, and we don't want to piss off our customer and make them feel stupid.

    At the end of the day, the act of physically carrying a particular call is NOT the major expense for a telco. Most of the cost is tied up in developing/maintaining/owning the CAPABILITY to carry the call. The paying customers are supporting that capability. After that a few lost calls doesn't really make much difference. as long as the fraud is only a small percentage of total phone calls (hopefully happens during non-peak hours) and doesn't trigger customer service calls or loss of service, then I can say that there just isn't much business rational to do anything about it. It is illogical to spend $100,000 to detect $1,000 worth of loss. And this seems to be the inevitable terminal condition for any fraud detection operation in the company. It gets to a point where too little fraud is being found and then you stop trying.

    finding cloned sims is probably something to make a routine however. it is too obviously a serious area of potential fraud.

    --
    No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
  192. Re:My "partner"? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    In the future I would like to do something like that, however, hoenstly....

    Its a matter of who you choose to do it with. I had the right friend, not a hugly close or good friend, but the right kind of friend, one with good buisness sense and an honest person. We both lived on the premisis and rented out rooms, split everything down the middle.

    I wouldn't do that with just anyone. Some of my best and closest friends arn't the people I would enter into a serious buisness arrangement with. Was there risk? Hell ya, but it worked for us and 3 years later, I own the place on my own. Frankly, in this area, its the only really viable way to swing it. In the end though, its a buisness, and you have to treat it as such, and be partnered with someone who does also.

    Realise that as we did it, we could leverage firsttime homebuyer programs and other goodies. I would think that a corperation (admittedly I havn't looked into this) would be more problematic, because the bank will consider it higher risk (like an income property, ie a place you don't intend to live) so a higher downpayment (typically 1/4 of the total value) rather than 20% that a normal private party sale can get away with.

    -Steve

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  193. Re:My "partner"? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

    And there are some homosexuals who think heterosexuality is stupid?

    Well actually mostly just distasteful....;) After all, women are good to talk to, nothing more!