The literal kind, I suppose. The other kind would probably be instead termed something like resuscitation, revivification or resurrection, depending on whether the subject is a little, mostly or all dead.
Elections like this don't get manipulated during the ballot-casting, because they're not decided during the ballot-casting. Just like the decisions of a legislative body, the vote itself is merely the result of a ton of secret politics leading up to it.
Could you link to the RFC that specifies the IP via Bullets protocol? Or are you saying these troubles would go away if people started shooting government officials? Because yeah, that'd totally be the appropriate response and not make anything worse.
You don't need to limit it to 435 at that point. Barrier clauses and the limit on the number of representatives are chiefly for cutting administrative costs. In your model, the election and regular government would have to be carried out electronically anyway (due to complexity of vote counting), which scales well.
You could end up with a system where all legislative action is essentially by referendum, but where constituents could assign their vote to delegates at will.
Yeah, but then users complain because the bar is weirdly scaled, like 95% taking up a second and the remaining 5% an hour. You can try to profile it, but the actual time is determined by the local hardware after all: Processor speed, number of cores (which affects only some operations), network speed, free memory - there's no way to predict how much of the time will be spend on each task.
(And if the progress bar isn't an indicator of execution time at all, then the arbitrary completion percentages assigned by the developer mean little. In that case, you may as well go back to hourglasses and spinning beachballs...)
Slashdot Mirror
Er... way to fuck up, Texas? Good luck suing NASA.
what you did there i see it
The literal kind, I suppose. The other kind would probably be instead termed something like resuscitation, revivification or resurrection, depending on whether the subject is a little, mostly or all dead.
Because instead of taping your password to the screen or in your wallet, let's stamp it on everything you touch.
Well, they could at least publically acknowledge the breach...
Elections like this don't get manipulated during the ballot-casting, because they're not decided during the ballot-casting. Just like the decisions of a legislative body, the vote itself is merely the result of a ton of secret politics leading up to it.
what you did there
i see it
And that's how Equestria was made!
This sounds as though the encryption is capable of evading triangulation. Don't know how they want to do that...
Just ignore the links in the email, go to the website you know to be real, and change your password.
Could you link to the RFC that specifies the IP via Bullets protocol? Or are you saying these troubles would go away if people started shooting government officials? Because yeah, that'd totally be the appropriate response and not make anything worse.
(Man, do you gun fanatics even hear yourselves?)
PS: There's actually a key combination to focus the URL bar. Ctrl-L in Firefox, apparently. So 0 clicks, I guess. :P
*click on URL bar*
*enter URL*
*hit enter*
There, one click.
A bosun is someone leading a ship's work crew.
(The "evil asshole" was not directed at the GP; sorry for vagueness.)
Wait, let me go buy a labcoat.
There.
Now, how much do I get for lying and telling you you're not an evil asshole?
You don't need to limit it to 435 at that point. Barrier clauses and the limit on the number of representatives are chiefly for cutting administrative costs. In your model, the election and regular government would have to be carried out electronically anyway (due to complexity of vote counting), which scales well.
You could end up with a system where all legislative action is essentially by referendum, but where constituents could assign their vote to delegates at will.
"Professional bullshit extraction facilitator."
They'll think you're in marketing.
Blowing up your engine sounds like an excellent way to safely stop your car while going at 200km/h.
I guess we're finally there, starting with the microcontrollers in cars.
I love when the headline question is answered right there in the summary.
No, but they can see red people.
(*rimshot*)
7 is also reserved for historic reasons, I believe.
And a project to capture and safely retrieving the asteroid could be as cheap as $200B.
Yeah, but then users complain because the bar is weirdly scaled, like 95% taking up a second and the remaining 5% an hour. You can try to profile it, but the actual time is determined by the local hardware after all: Processor speed, number of cores (which affects only some operations), network speed, free memory - there's no way to predict how much of the time will be spend on each task.
(And if the progress bar isn't an indicator of execution time at all, then the arbitrary completion percentages assigned by the developer mean little. In that case, you may as well go back to hourglasses and spinning beachballs...)