I don't like what Assange is doing right now because he's trying to manipulate our election. If he wasn't exclusively trying to harm Clinton and if he just released them instead of timing the releases for the most damage and if the releases actually contained something worth giving a damn about I would be ok about it. But as it is what he's doing has nothing to do with transparency and that's why he's lost so much respect.
Maybe because the only dirty player in this election is the Clinton team? Maybe Bernie and the GOP were playing by the proper rules - rather than rigging the entire thing for themselves, so there IS no dirt on Trump or Bernie - just Clinton.
Trump is guilty of sexual assault, and proud of it.
False, and provably so. On the other hand, Bill IS proven guilty and has paid to make it go away. And Hillary IS on record as saying it was all fake...
you're both a complete shitbag and a compleat useful idiot.
Don't forget that Hillary has ZERO issues with banning political speech that she doesn't like... Fascism - the meeting of Corporate and Government power, and using the result to further those wielding the power - is embodied in the Clintons.
It's well known that some politicians are little more than fronts for corporations.
Especially when said politician is in a position of influence over relations with foreign powers (Governments and corporations), and has a personal "foundation" that is used to keep their family in an opulent lifestyle... I mean, going from $8 million in debt to $150 million in wealth in just 15 years IS a bit suspicious, don't you think?
No, it's shit. It's shit because it leads to shit posts like yours.
Stay classy, drinkypoo, stay classy!
You're in denial if you think Trump won't do as he is told by the money.
Hillary disagrees with you, she believes that rich, successful businessmen are much harder to buy, harder to influence. So - are you wrong, or is Hillary wrong?
Only for lack of opportunity.
Potentially, yes - but no proof of that action. On the other hand, we have an impeached potential First Spouse, who paid off one accuser (to the tune of $850,000) and lost his law license over using his authority to sexually assault an employee. And his wife, running for President, enabled that behavior by virulently attacking her political enemies ("vast right wing conspiracy"), those who were sexually assaulted, and everyone she disagreed with.
It's OK, though - we know that for you it's words that supercede actions, it's potentials over actuals. Because it's ideology over all, right?
Hillary disagrees with you. She believes there should be more successful businessmen in politics. That having billions basically eliminates the control of Wall Street.
In fact, Hillary herself says we should look to elect successful businessmen because they are typically above being bought. Implying that she CAN be bought. Of course, when she said that, she was giving a speech to really wealthy Wall Street folks, so the implication was a good ploy to ask for "donations"...
his supporters claim that Clinton freed a rapist and laughed about it, and that her husband (?!) is worse.
Except she did laugh about it, and her husband was impeached (and paid off $850,000, and lost his law license) over sexual assault. But I guess boasts are worse than actual actions, eh? Better to kill a dozen people than just talk about it! Better to arrest and blame an innocent video maker about the cause of four people's deaths (including an ambassador in her direct command) than to simply talk about it, eh?
My take on this is that if you think Trump is some kind of peacenik then you are personally the argument for the electoral college, because that is dumber than dogshit.
Only one candidate has started a war. Only one candidate has fanned the flames of war in the Middle East. Only one candidate has a spouse that started several "military actions". Only one candidate is trying to start a war with Russia. Only one candidate has never met a military action they didn't love. Only one candidate loves to talk about private and public positions. Denial is a great thing for you, isn't it drinkypoo?
How can a woman stand by and enthusiastically support an enabler of a rapist? How can a woman cheer for someone who attacks victims of sexual assault? That's called politics - and it means that "gender" only beats politics if the politics lean right. Rapists on the left? Leftist attacks on sexual assault victims? All A-OK!
Wait, this homelessness is all a lie. I'm told over and over in the media that the economy is great, unemployment is at 5% (effectively 100% employment), that Obama has ushered in a new age of prosperity, and that Hillary! will continue and grow this prosperity with the help of her husband Bill "The Rapist" Clinton. How can ANYONE be homeless right now?
In the Washington State case, the ballots were mailed out later than Federal regulations allowed. Clear violation of a regulation that has associated penalties - but no prosecution was recommended. Just - dropped. In violation of the law.
Yes, I know I'm an idealist, i still believe the justice departments and law enforcement authorities operate outside of political influence. But when your job (or other benefits) as chief law enforcement officer hinges on your boss getting re-elected, I guess things like this get overlooked.
Touch screens on keyboards? What the hell is Apple thinking? They came out with the perfect computer UI years ago and still haven't released it. And with Siri you can do automatic spell checking too!
Or, you just take whomever was in charge of mailing the ballots and charge them with a case of voter suppression for each and every late ballot. Looking at hundreds of lifetimes worth of jail time should HOPEFULLY push the elections commissioner to make sure those ballots go out on time or even early. If there's one group who should NOT have their ballots monkeyed with, it's those deployed overseas in service to their country.
Washington is also a vote-by-mail-only State (like Oregon) and these clear violations of voter rights still happen. All it takes is a few political hacks in the bureaucracy and ballots go out late - and thus votes are denied. Washington sent them out "early" as well, but not early enough (later than the actual Federal requirements) so the ballots cannot be returned in time to be counted before the results are certified.
Slashdot Mirror
Cleaner than Clinton, absolutely. Without doubt.
I don't like what Assange is doing right now because he's trying to manipulate our election. If he wasn't exclusively trying to harm Clinton and if he just released them instead of timing the releases for the most damage and if the releases actually contained something worth giving a damn about I would be ok about it. But as it is what he's doing has nothing to do with transparency and that's why he's lost so much respect.
Maybe because the only dirty player in this election is the Clinton team? Maybe Bernie and the GOP were playing by the proper rules - rather than rigging the entire thing for themselves, so there IS no dirt on Trump or Bernie - just Clinton.
NY Times on Trump's worth - at least $1.8 billion net positive. Don't go through life ignorant... It takes but a second to find this information...
The Times says he's worth at least $1.8 billion if not more, per FEC financials. But I guess that's not successful enough?
Trump is guilty of sexual assault, and proud of it.
False, and provably so. On the other hand, Bill IS proven guilty and has paid to make it go away. And Hillary IS on record as saying it was all fake...
you're both a complete shitbag and a compleat useful idiot.
You stay classy, drinkypoo!
After all, CNN claims it's illegal for us to read them, but it's different for them. So just trust CNN/MSNBC/ABC/NYT to summarize and give you the information you need to know. They won't steer you wrong!
Don't forget that Hillary has ZERO issues with banning political speech that she doesn't like... Fascism - the meeting of Corporate and Government power, and using the result to further those wielding the power - is embodied in the Clintons.
It's well known that some politicians are little more than fronts for corporations.
Especially when said politician is in a position of influence over relations with foreign powers (Governments and corporations), and has a personal "foundation" that is used to keep their family in an opulent lifestyle... I mean, going from $8 million in debt to $150 million in wealth in just 15 years IS a bit suspicious, don't you think?
No, it's shit. It's shit because it leads to shit posts like yours.
Stay classy, drinkypoo, stay classy!
You're in denial if you think Trump won't do as he is told by the money.
Hillary disagrees with you, she believes that rich, successful businessmen are much harder to buy, harder to influence. So - are you wrong, or is Hillary wrong?
Only for lack of opportunity.
Potentially, yes - but no proof of that action. On the other hand, we have an impeached potential First Spouse, who paid off one accuser (to the tune of $850,000) and lost his law license over using his authority to sexually assault an employee. And his wife, running for President, enabled that behavior by virulently attacking her political enemies ("vast right wing conspiracy"), those who were sexually assaulted, and everyone she disagreed with.
It's OK, though - we know that for you it's words that supercede actions, it's potentials over actuals. Because it's ideology over all, right?
Sold until September 2013. I guess that 3 years renders a product "obsolete" in the Apple world...
Hillary disagrees with you. She believes there should be more successful businessmen in politics. That having billions basically eliminates the control of Wall Street.
In fact, Hillary herself says we should look to elect successful businessmen because they are typically above being bought. Implying that she CAN be bought. Of course, when she said that, she was giving a speech to really wealthy Wall Street folks, so the implication was a good ploy to ask for "donations"...
his supporters claim that Clinton freed a rapist and laughed about it, and that her husband (?!) is worse.
Except she did laugh about it, and her husband was impeached (and paid off $850,000, and lost his law license) over sexual assault. But I guess boasts are worse than actual actions, eh? Better to kill a dozen people than just talk about it! Better to arrest and blame an innocent video maker about the cause of four people's deaths (including an ambassador in her direct command) than to simply talk about it, eh?
My take on this is that if you think Trump is some kind of peacenik then you are personally the argument for the electoral college, because that is dumber than dogshit.
Only one candidate has started a war. Only one candidate has fanned the flames of war in the Middle East. Only one candidate has a spouse that started several "military actions". Only one candidate is trying to start a war with Russia. Only one candidate has never met a military action they didn't love. Only one candidate loves to talk about private and public positions. Denial is a great thing for you, isn't it drinkypoo?
How can a woman stand by and enthusiastically support an enabler of a rapist? How can a woman cheer for someone who attacks victims of sexual assault? That's called politics - and it means that "gender" only beats politics if the politics lean right. Rapists on the left? Leftist attacks on sexual assault victims? All A-OK!
Other than admission that the email scandal was, in fact, a real scandal and that the Clinton team knew that what they were doing was wrong. Or coordinating with the media to spike damaging stories. Or how the San Bernadino shooting situation would have been better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.
And here is photographic proof of Trump grabbing a pussy...
In this case, it was Washington State violating Federal law. And the Feds turned a blind eye towards it...
Wait, this homelessness is all a lie. I'm told over and over in the media that the economy is great, unemployment is at 5% (effectively 100% employment), that Obama has ushered in a new age of prosperity, and that Hillary! will continue and grow this prosperity with the help of her husband Bill "The Rapist" Clinton. How can ANYONE be homeless right now?
In Soviet Russia, KGB Trumps YOU!
In the Washington State case, the ballots were mailed out later than Federal regulations allowed. Clear violation of a regulation that has associated penalties - but no prosecution was recommended. Just - dropped. In violation of the law.
Yes, I know I'm an idealist, i still believe the justice departments and law enforcement authorities operate outside of political influence. But when your job (or other benefits) as chief law enforcement officer hinges on your boss getting re-elected, I guess things like this get overlooked.
Touch screens on keyboards? What the hell is Apple thinking? They came out with the perfect computer UI years ago and still haven't released it. And with Siri you can do automatic spell checking too!
Or, you just take whomever was in charge of mailing the ballots and charge them with a case of voter suppression for each and every late ballot. Looking at hundreds of lifetimes worth of jail time should HOPEFULLY push the elections commissioner to make sure those ballots go out on time or even early. If there's one group who should NOT have their ballots monkeyed with, it's those deployed overseas in service to their country.
Washington is also a vote-by-mail-only State (like Oregon) and these clear violations of voter rights still happen. All it takes is a few political hacks in the bureaucracy and ballots go out late - and thus votes are denied. Washington sent them out "early" as well, but not early enough (later than the actual Federal requirements) so the ballots cannot be returned in time to be counted before the results are certified.