So you have statistics that show iPhone is gaining market share? According to their own data in this very article, iPhone shipments are down. And now Huawei ships more phones than Apple, bumping them down to 3rd place...
Although, to be fair the ban on the bologna sandwich is not because of restaurants losing customers, but because SF has decided that meat is murder, you should have a nice quinoa-and-kale sandwich on stone-ground pita.
You don't have to associate with each and every corporation - it's voluntary. Not so with the local Government. Government has the power to compel you to take actions, and to indefinitely detain you - corporations do not.
Yes, the $35K unit does 0-60 in 5.6 seconds; the Honda Accord does it in 5.7, and the Toyota Camry in 6.0 flat. So basically the same performance levels. Except the Tesla is a stripper model with really no options, and the Accord and Camry (in addition to having the same interior dimensions) have every option you can get.
EVs do have the potential to win - however, I don't think Tesla will be the one to do it, considering they lose money on every vehicle they sell - BEFORE you account for things like R&D, interest on debt, etc. Just the cost of the car and sales/admin costs related to the sale results in a loss. If it is Tesla who really gets the win - it's because they've been bought by someone else, as a new brand added to another company's stable. But my money is actually on either Toyota or VW winning - they are both committing to EVs and hybrids, and have the capital, expertise, and systems in place to actually build EVs in volume and make a profit doing so.
So, the non-existent truck using non-existent chargers, still takes more refuel-to-road time as compared to the existing hydrogen-powered truck and the existing hydrogen stations?
From my link above, June 2017 saw iOS with a 19.5% market share. In June 2018 it was 18.9%. I don't think that qualifies as increasing market share, but then I am outside the reality distortion field.
It's about the same range as the Tesla truck, but given it's an H2 truck, if there are fuel stations, you can refill in about 10-15 minutes, which means long-haul is a potential. The rumored Tesla semi truck will have somewhere around 600 kWh of battery, meaning it would take a supercharger around 5 hours to recharge. That's a big advantage of liquid or gas fuels - near-instant refills. Range on a tank is really much less important when you have to stop every 4-5 hours to refill for 15 minutes, versus stopping every 4-5 hours to recharge for 4-5 hours.
It's only rated as a compact luxury car because they are priced like that; when you drop $60K on a car, it's not really an affordable, mass-market vehicle. When the Model 3 for $35K starts shipping - that will be akin to the Accord or Camry. Of course, that that vehicle does not exist...
Dimensionally - it's the same as an Accord or Camry. Trunk space - same size. If it sold for $35K, it would be a well-optioned Accord or Camry. Performance wise, the three are within about half a second in the 0-60. They are 4 door sedans. I know Tesla fans like to compare against the European brands - but it's a Accord or Camry competitor.
Learn how audio channels are sent. AAC uses the same protocol and packet size as SBC and thus has the same latency. Aptx has different packet sizing so it can send more information with the same latency as SBC/AAC - and Aptx LL sends smaller packets so the latency is less. But you're an ignorant fool who's an Apple tool, so - no surprise.
No, it's a mid-size family car (like the Camry or Accord) but because of the way they're getting sold, you can only buy the $50K+ models, and thus they are priced like a luxury vehicle.
If they had an actual $35K vehicle for sale, then they could be compared to mid-size vehicles like the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry, both of which compete nicely at the $35K price point. And crush the model 3 in terms of sales volumes.
Well of COURSE there's going to be a hyperloop there - how else can we realistically wind the wire coil around the planet in any reasonable amount of time? Duh! Sometimes ACs are SOOOO stupid...
Not a problem! Look, Musk is all over it... First, we send a bunch of SolarCity installs to Mars, followed by Powerwalls to provide power during the dark time. Then a big coil of wire around the equator of the planet, and - BAM! - instant magnetic field!
Slashdot Mirror
So you have statistics that show iPhone is gaining market share? According to their own data in this very article, iPhone shipments are down. And now Huawei ships more phones than Apple, bumping them down to 3rd place...
No, the Accord and Camry have high-end versions, they just sell for around $35-40K...
Although, to be fair the ban on the bologna sandwich is not because of restaurants losing customers, but because SF has decided that meat is murder, you should have a nice quinoa-and-kale sandwich on stone-ground pita.
You don't have to associate with each and every corporation - it's voluntary. Not so with the local Government. Government has the power to compel you to take actions, and to indefinitely detain you - corporations do not.
They will also mandate Korean BBQ for everyone, where you even have to COOK your own food!
Wait - shoe cobbler? Damn it... Here I was all ready to support the peach cobbler mandate!
Yes, the $35K unit does 0-60 in 5.6 seconds; the Honda Accord does it in 5.7, and the Toyota Camry in 6.0 flat. So basically the same performance levels. Except the Tesla is a stripper model with really no options, and the Accord and Camry (in addition to having the same interior dimensions) have every option you can get.
EVs do have the potential to win - however, I don't think Tesla will be the one to do it, considering they lose money on every vehicle they sell - BEFORE you account for things like R&D, interest on debt, etc. Just the cost of the car and sales/admin costs related to the sale results in a loss. If it is Tesla who really gets the win - it's because they've been bought by someone else, as a new brand added to another company's stable. But my money is actually on either Toyota or VW winning - they are both committing to EVs and hybrids, and have the capital, expertise, and systems in place to actually build EVs in volume and make a profit doing so.
They know how to spend your money better than you OR your employer!
Let's ban sharp plastic objects, because bad people can use them to do bad things!
That's not a bad idea...
/sarc
So, the non-existent truck using non-existent chargers, still takes more refuel-to-road time as compared to the existing hydrogen-powered truck and the existing hydrogen stations?
The cost is equivalent to $5.60 per gallon of gas, and Toyota includes 3 years of free fuel...
From my link above, June 2017 saw iOS with a 19.5% market share. In June 2018 it was 18.9%. I don't think that qualifies as increasing market share, but then I am outside the reality distortion field.
It's about the same range as the Tesla truck, but given it's an H2 truck, if there are fuel stations, you can refill in about 10-15 minutes, which means long-haul is a potential. The rumored Tesla semi truck will have somewhere around 600 kWh of battery, meaning it would take a supercharger around 5 hours to recharge. That's a big advantage of liquid or gas fuels - near-instant refills. Range on a tank is really much less important when you have to stop every 4-5 hours to refill for 15 minutes, versus stopping every 4-5 hours to recharge for 4-5 hours.
Winning the battle but losing the war? iPhone market share continues to slide, and that WILL eventually catch up with them. We already see companies dropping support for Macs because the user base is too small to justify development costs. As the iPhone heads towards single-digit market share, it will start to suffer the same thing.
It's only rated as a compact luxury car because they are priced like that; when you drop $60K on a car, it's not really an affordable, mass-market vehicle. When the Model 3 for $35K starts shipping - that will be akin to the Accord or Camry. Of course, that that vehicle does not exist...
What features does a base model Tesla Model 3 have that are not present in the Accord?
What $35K Tesla Model 3 does 0-60 in 3.5 seconds?
Dimensionally - it's the same as an Accord or Camry. Trunk space - same size. If it sold for $35K, it would be a well-optioned Accord or Camry. Performance wise, the three are within about half a second in the 0-60. They are 4 door sedans. I know Tesla fans like to compare against the European brands - but it's a Accord or Camry competitor.
Learn how audio channels are sent. AAC uses the same protocol and packet size as SBC and thus has the same latency. Aptx has different packet sizing so it can send more information with the same latency as SBC/AAC - and Aptx LL sends smaller packets so the latency is less. But you're an ignorant fool who's an Apple tool, so - no surprise.
No, it's a mid-size family car (like the Camry or Accord) but because of the way they're getting sold, you can only buy the $50K+ models, and thus they are priced like a luxury vehicle.
Considering you can get close to 30 MPG in a modern SUV, a gas crisis may not have the impact it had last time...
If they had an actual $35K vehicle for sale, then they could be compared to mid-size vehicles like the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry, both of which compete nicely at the $35K price point. And crush the model 3 in terms of sales volumes.
Well of COURSE there's going to be a hyperloop there - how else can we realistically wind the wire coil around the planet in any reasonable amount of time? Duh! Sometimes ACs are SOOOO stupid...
Curious that the entire article ignores the fact that Manafort's charges arise from working with the Ukraine - with John Podesta!
Not a problem! Look, Musk is all over it... First, we send a bunch of SolarCity installs to Mars, followed by Powerwalls to provide power during the dark time. Then a big coil of wire around the equator of the planet, and - BAM! - instant magnetic field!