Slashdot Mirror


The Next iPad Pros Will Shrink and Lose Their Headphone Jacks, Says Report (9to5mac.com)

According to supply chain blog Macotakara, the new iPad Pro models that will be introduced later this year will be slimmer, feature Face ID, and have no headphone jacks. 9to5Mac reports the details: First off, the report offers additional details on the 2018 iPad Pro dimensions. The 10.5-inch model is said to come in at 247.5mm (H) x 178.7mm (W) x 6mm (T), compared to the current dimensions of 250.6mm x 174.1mm x 6.1 mm. Meanwhile, the 12.9-inch iPad Pro is said to stack up at 280mm (H) x 215mm (W) x 6.4mm (T), which compares to the current-generation model at 305.7 x 220.6 x 6.9 mm. With these dimensions, it seems that Apple is focused more on reducing the overall footprint of the 12.9-inch model, fitting the same size display into a considerably smaller body. The report goes on to explain that Apple is likely to ditch the headphone jack with this year's iPad Pro models, a move the company first made with the iPhone 7. While Apple includes a Lightning to 3.5mm headphone adapter to ease the blow for iPhone users, it will not do the same for iPad Pro users, according to today's report.

Today's report corroborates that this year's iPad Pro models will feature Face ID, but it notes that there is no support for landscape Face ID as earlier reports had indicated. This presents an interesting problem for the iPad Pro, which is used commonly in landscape mode with accessories such as the Smart Keyboard. Macotakara notes, however, that Apple is moving the Smart Connector on this year's models to "the lower rear side -- close to the Lightning connector." What exactly this means is unclear, but the report explains that "the next iPad Pro Smart Keyboard may be changed to vertical position specifications." This is seemingly implying that the iPad Pro would dock vertically into the Smart Keyboard, but how that would work is vague at the moment.

219 comments

  1. Courage by Silicon-Surfer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Such courage!

    1. Re:Courage by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3

      Such bullshit!

      While end-users do not seem to have picked up on this yet, "biometric" authentication is a security failure, and face recognition makes it even worse.

      I warned about this long ago.

      If you think it's bad someone can get your fingerprint while you sleep, wait until it's your face.

    2. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean, itâ(TM)s worked very well.

    3. Re:Courage by SirMasterboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fortunately FaceID requires your eyes to be open. I think it's probably pretty difficult to open the eyes of someone sleeping without waking them. Seems more secure than a fingerprint.

      And if you are some sort of high profile individual who is afraid of or can't take the risk of being attacked by a super expensive face scan and 3D mask created of your likeness or something, then just don't enable FaceID. It's completely optional.

      FaceID is meant as a convenience feature for the majority of average people who don't need to worry about several-thousand dollar tech attacks against them because they just aren't important enough to spend those kinds of resources to attack.

    4. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'll not just lose their headphone jacks, they'll lose their customers!

    5. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wanna bet? When it came to voting with their wallets people chose TPM, closed systems, Windows 10, surveillance, unreplaceable batteries... Need I go on? We who care are an infinitesimaly small percentage of the customer base that can, and will, be safely ignored. Where's your Linux on the desktop yet?

    6. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I absolutely HATE practical long-standing things. Hopefully they will remove the screen and just rent a video stream directly to your Apple Enhanced DRM Eyes. Wirelessly of course. What I really want is a bunch of energy-draining wireless gadgets that are broadcasting every bit of data that passes thru, wrapped up in a nice fashionable, smooooth chiclet brick with NO SCREEN that must be replaced frequently for not less than $1500. and serves as the main wireless hub for all my rented signals, which can be turned off at anytime, except for the array of built-in surveillance-gathering sensors - which can never be turned off. But it must feature a prominent Apple logo. That is really the most important feature, IMHO.

    7. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is however not hard to sneak upon a sleeping person, knock them unconscious and open their eyes.
      Biometrics are identification not authentication, much less anything upon which authorization should be provided.

    8. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 is free. I don't know anyone who actually paid for a license. It does not need to be activated

    9. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been watching far too much Hollywood pap. It is in fact very difficult to render someone unconscious, unless you're a SEAL or Green Beret or MMA fighter.

      "Knock them unconscious" will most likely end up killing them, or more likely create you a very wide awake and very pissed off person.

    10. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing in your list really inconveniences most users, hence they don't give a shit. removing a headphone jack is a direct and immediate impact for many of them. MY wife has Iphones, MacBook, ipad, ipad mini and a MacBook air. That all stopped with the iPhone 7 (she bought it then returned it after 2 weeks with no jack), was amazing to see how the single removal of the jack was enough to finally get her to realise how crap most Apple stuff is and I am glad to say we have not had a single new Apple device in the house since.

    11. Re: Courage by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      "Knock them unconscious" will most likely end up killing them

      Unconscious? Dead? Who cares, so long as the body's still warm enough for the IR scanner and the eyes can be propped open?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    12. Re:Courage by corezz · · Score: 1

      When dealing with consumer electronics, convenience always trump all others issues. The market will polish off the problems until it becomes good enough. And the consumer will rejoice. It's happened before, and it will happen here as well.

    13. Re: Courage by corezz · · Score: 1

      Kirk just has to do a chop to the side of the neck to put humans & aliens to sleep.
      I see no reason to change this tried and true galaxy-approved method.

    14. Re: Courage by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Heartbeat apps that require nothing more than looking at the camera have existed for years. I’d be mildly surprised if FaceID didn’t require a heartbeat.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    15. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well sure, but you have to learn how to fuck green alien chicks first.

    16. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in

    17. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BOLD.

    18. Re: Courage by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Funny

      It works as well as Apple keyboards on Slashdot.

      --
      No sig today...
    19. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ewww,,,

    20. Re:Courage by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      FaceID is classic Apple bullshit. They wanted to get rid of the home button, which is fine. Android moved to soft buttons years ago, they work great. But where to put the fingerprint reader?

      Through glass fingerprint readers weren't working very well at the time. Many Android phones already started putting the reader on the back, so can't do that because it wouldn't be special and unique to Apple. So they invented FaceID. Throw an expensive camera system at the problem, and it's still slower than a high end fingerprint reader.

      By the way, it only requires eyes open if you have the "require attention" box ticked.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or apple keyboards on apple laptops.

    22. Re: Courage by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how FaceID compares, but with Windows Hello, it works 'good enough' but not nearly well enough to have a hope of logging in as someone with their bludgeoned, dead carcass. Besides which, if you have the PC in question, just pull the drive and crack it elsewhere.

    23. Re:Courage by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a step up in security for most people. My mom has a Mac Book Pro and refuses to put a password on it. She would do the same thing on an ipad if she had one.

    24. Re: Courage by Holi · · Score: 1

      Fine, choke them till they pass out. It's not difficult to cut the blood flow to the brain.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    25. Re:Courage by Holi · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the $1000+ it cost drives away far more customers then the lack of a headphone jack

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    26. Re:Courage by Megane · · Score: 1

      When will they have the courage to lose the Lightning port? The future is USB-C, and not only have they made a major product with it already, they went all-in and removed all other types of ports. Also, I know that USB-C is now mainstream, as I have already had someone ask me in the past month if I had a charger cable they could borrow.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    27. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's time to retire the Apple ridicule category. You nailed it, buddy.

    28. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Idiocracy. I dumped iPhone over having no headphone jack. I replaced my Mac book with a Dell XPS 13 with Linux. That took some adjusting, which I am now happy I made the switch.

    29. Re: Courage by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      I'm wondering what the point to this is.

      They've shrink it by a whole 3mm in width/height; Is that just to make all the existing iPad docks and protective cases incompatible or is a 1.2% reduction a really big deal in Apple land?

      --
      No sig today...
    30. Re:Courage by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android moved to soft buttons years ago, they work great

      No they don't. The moment an app needs to go full screen they fail miserably, requiring vague often-misinterpreted swipes from off the screen and as a significant number of apps need to go full screen, from movie players to games, this isn't a theoretical problem suffered by a small handful of people. Android's implementation is particularly shitty because it also allows you to rotate the screen at any angle, while only allowing the buttons to appear on the "real bottom" of the phone, which means the side of the screen you're supposed to swipe from is frequently not where you'd expect it to be.

      I've gotten to the point I will not get an Android phone that doesn't have dedicated buttons. Thankfully there are still quite a few of them left, except at the very "high end" which are generally phones nobody in their right mind would want anyway.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    31. Re: Courage by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Considering that masks don't have heartbeats and FaceID has been fooled with a mask...............

      Be surprised.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    32. Re: Courage by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Besides which, if you have the PC in question, just pull the drive and crack it elsewhere.

      And if you have the iOS device in question?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    33. Re: Courage by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      It is however not hard to sneak upon a sleeping person, knock them unconscious and open their eyes. Biometrics are identification not authentication, much less anything upon which authorization should be provided.

      So? Do I have to link to the XKCD comic, or do we all still remember it?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    34. Re: Courage by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Then you send it to Israel and have them crack it and give you the files, I guess. I suppose either case is still beyond "goon with a pipe wrench".

    35. Re:Courage by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Such bullshit! While end-users do not seem to have picked up on this yet, "biometric" authentication is a security failure, and face recognition makes it even worse. I warned about this long ago. If you think it's bad someone can get your fingerprint while you sleep, wait until it's your face.

      Wasn't it you who warned us that muggers would cut off fingers to get into stolen iPones?

      Anyway, good luck handling the iPad without disabling the Face ID feature when you try to unlock it on that sleeper - remember that "bug" at the keynote that turned out to be security working?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    36. Re: Courage by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Fine, choke them till they pass out. It's not difficult to cut the blood flow to the brain.

      As proven by you - somebody did it to you and you still post.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    37. Re:Courage by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the skin your phone has, but I've never had this problem on a Google Pixel XL. When apps go full screen it's always either tap anywhere or swipe down from the top as if you were opening the notification shade.

      Then again I don't play a lot of games, maybe they are worse for full screen stuff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re: Courage by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Considering that FaceID has been successfully fooled with a mask, I'm confident you don't have to go quite that far to get around it. Maybe stand on the corner with the phone and a photo of the owner and offer anyone with similar facial features to your target $5 to try to unlock it and $100 if successful. You get 5 attempts, and we've already seen that siblings and other relatives can, quite often, unlock each other's iPhones.
      Of course, that's if it doesn't unlock for the corpse. Have you tried the corpse method? I haven't but I have a hunch it would work quite well, actually.

      Another option, and I'm not sure why I didn't think of it earlier, would be to put a pair of UV blocking sunglasses on the target. You should be able to find a pair that fits loosely enough to not disturb their slumber, yet tight enough to stay in place. FaceID does work if your eyes are obscured by sunglasses, and it can't very well check whether they're open under those conditions.

      Both of those options are cheaper and faster than sending the phone overseas, or using GrayKey, and you can always fall back to these if the above should fail.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    39. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with refusing to put a password on is that any prankster who gains physical access can put their password on it.

    40. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I paid for a retail box Windows 10 license. I can install it where I want, when I want. It was $110 at a local department store.

    41. Re:Courage by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      While end-users do not seem to have picked up on this yet, "biometric" authentication is a security failure, and face recognition makes it even worse.

      I help setup personal smartphones for a lot of people.
      I've pleaded with them to setup PINs, and sometimes even refused to help them unless they put a simple 4-6 digit PIN. Those I forced to do it in that way removed them a few days later.

      When biometric authentication came along, I FINALLY got everyone that had NO SECURITY AT ALL to at least keep biometric authentication turned on.

      That's what this is for. Biometric authentication is better than none.

      Those of us that need something better will turn this off and stick to long passwords, or even better would be biometric combined with long passwords.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    42. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't pay for one and I can do the same shit. Congrats, you got robbed.

    43. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry. She can log in as root with no password and remove it.

    44. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God that was embarrassing for apple. They looked soooo stupid. Hohoho. LOL Good times.

    45. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Apple laptops that spontaneously burst into flames.

    46. Re:Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a phone I can maybe see USB-C. On a portable computer it is complete idiocy - comes unplugged all the time. True, they no longer call them laptops, so I guess you're only supposed to set them down on a hard surface, but if you put it on your lap, they come unplugged constantly.

    47. Re: Courage by Holi · · Score: 1

      Ahh, another 13 year old posting. Did you get daddy's permission?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    48. Re: Courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't customize desktop and taskbar settings until it's activated.

    49. Re: Courage by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Ahh, another 13 year old posting. Did you get daddy's permission?

      Talking about yourself again? Sorry that that strangling did lead to brain damage.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. About time annd who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It hasnt been an issue with phones and laptops so who cares about the ipad. Not even minor news anymore

    1. Re:About time annd who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends on what you call not an issue. I think the loss of the headphone jack is awesome as for the last 2 years my wife has decided she doesn't want a new iPhone as without the headphone jack she doesn't want it (win win in my books, though probably not the win Apple had in mind).

  3. This is not good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How will I tether my new iPad to my butthole? All the current rectal attachments are made for the 3.5mm anus jack.

    1. Re:This is not good news by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You should upgrade to 1/4" audio jacks, they're much bigger and also longer!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re: This is not good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Cocks dildo collection features headphone jack after you use Dremel to drill some holes in them. Works like a charm.

  4. I don't use Apple products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and haven't used it since my last Mac died, over a decade ago.

    Haven't been missing Apple, either.

  5. tech nes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to view all new tech news in europe. we have you covered. http://techtalkeurope.com

    1. Re: tech nes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Anything to get me off this stupid site.

  6. Does it matter? by pablo_max · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For my personal use, I have found that switching to a phone that uses only USB-C, the P20 Pro in this case, I didn't really care about the headphones jack: I thought it would bother me, but since head phones are included and an extra dongle is also there, I has not had an impact.
    When I bike to work, I use a bluetooth sports style head set and in the car, I use Android auto and never head phones. I think it is technically illegal where I live to use headphones on both ears in the car anyhow.

    It does remind me of the old says when companies would come out with weird proprietary connectors for headphones so that you would have to buy their special headphones if you wanted to listen to music on your phone. Now, you can buy a dongle from them. Sure, maybe they only make 1$ on it, but how many iphones did they sell?
    Plus people will probably just buy new headphones with that lightning connector, which will be basically all profit.

    1. Re:Does it matter? by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its a fucking pain in the ass.

      between my bluetooth headphones running out of battery and having to own 3 extra dongles, which i often forget, including a splitter so i can charge my iphone whilst listening to music, i quantifiably listen to less music now that apple has done this.

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    2. Re:Does it matter? by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      Right, because the whole world is exactly like you.

    3. Re:Does it matter? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > including a splitter so i can charge my iphone whilst listening to music

      Which splitter are you using? TIA.

    4. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      its a fucking pain in the ass.

      between my bluetooth headphones running out of battery and having to own 3 extra dongles, which i often forget, including a splitter so i can charge my iphone whilst listening to music, i quantifiably listen to less music now that apple has done this.

      Same here, but with a Pixel 2.

      I have bluetooth earphones that have to be charged, don't sound as good as my Sennheiser headphones, and are less comfortable, but I had to get the Pixel due to software support.

      If I went with Samsung to get an android device with removable battery, SD card, and headphone support; I'll have to use their own special Samsung only processor, and root it to get rid of Samsung bloatware, and then still worry about the quality problem in most android roms.

      Mobile hardware is a clusterfuck

    5. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I bike to work, I use a bluetooth sports style head set

      Well, where I live, it is illegal to ride a bike while wearing headphones...

      I'm sure the cops will focus on that after they get bicycles to stop at red lights & stop signs...

    6. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dropping the 3.5mm port didn't affect iPhones because everyone buys a case and a lot of those started including 3.5mm ports.

      I don't know how popular iPad cases are, but I bet a number of people are going to start buying them.

    7. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah remember those old weird propietary connectors for headphones! so that you would have to buy their special headphones. Hah those guys!. I too remember it fondly in a kind of "hey guys, remember how they used to rip us off?" kind of way, Fuck I like it. I like these new headphones that need their own batteries and shit.

      Its nice having a completely new problem where there was none at all, in addition to not being able to use them for anything else. Shit it is really good when I think about it. Are you a Mexican plabo?

    8. Re:Does it matter? by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > i quantifiably listen to less music now that apple has done this.

      I listen to just as much. Because, y'know I have an Android tablet with a headphone jack. Super handy for coming into the office loaded up with tunes and just plugging a line in cable into and hitting play. Can't do that with any non-headphone jack device.

    9. Re:Does it matter? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      Did your iphone not come with a set of headsets with the proper plug? Why would you need a dongle for them? Why do you need 3 dongles? How many headsets to you actually require to listen to music?
      Most people just use the one or two.
      I have one at work and one at home.. not counting the bluetooth set. That lasts about 6 hours, which is way more than I need.
      The only time I could imagine needed to charge and listen to headphones at the same time is at work, but I am not really the type who can focus on work and listen to music at the same time, so for me it is a non-issue.
      I guess wireless charging would solve that issue.

    10. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice story, shame Apples story was completely different, stating it was due to lack of space.

    11. Re:Does it matter? by gravewax · · Score: 2

      try plugging in your headset while charging the phone, then you will understand why you need dongles.

    12. Re:Does it matter? by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Breathing is illegal...

    13. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much do you get paid to write these pieces?

    14. Re:Does it matter? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The red lights don't count if you're on the sidewalk!

      Signed,
        Every hipster uber-eats deliveroo tard ever.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re: Does it matter? by houghi · · Score: 1

      For cables I use USB magnetic cables. I even use them on my Raspberry Zero devices. One cable for everything.
      And I refuse to buy something without a headphone jack.

      I am in a different country, so I have one cable with me and a charger, while I have an ipad mine, an android device and a PC with me.
      The charger and Android are USB micro chargiing and the ipad is, well, different.

      Very convinient if you have multiple devices. Mac, usm mini and usb c devices mixed? No problems

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    16. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung hasn't had a device with a removable battery since the Note4. Hence why I still use a Note4 as my daily driver. The phone is still plenty powerful for todays uses. I've probably gone though 3 sets of batteries in the lifetime of this phone. They are still easy to come by. Bonus of the removable battery is that I almost NEVER have to plug in my phone to charge unless it is some emergency situation because i've used the phone much more than usual.

      I have a standalone charger for the battery that sits on my night stand. I swap the battery before going to work, and then again when i get home from work. Takes barely longer to swap a battery than it does to locate a charger and plug it in and i can go from barely any charge to 100% charge in seconds and move on with my life. If I have plans to be away from home for awhile I can grab that extra battery out of the stand alone charger, or even grab some of my worn out batteries. Sure they wont give me half a day usage anymore, but a few hours helps to get by.

    17. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like both of the Sony phones I have had over the last 5 years, both of which have headphone sockets?

    18. Re:Does it matter? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Samsung J1, J3 among other phones, had/have removable batteries. Think developing market phones vs flagships.

    19. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of waterproof phones with external connectors. You're talking shit.

    20. Re:Does it matter? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure wearing headphones while cycling is illegal almost everywhere.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    21. Re:Does it matter? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      My $25 bluetooth headphones last 8 hours on a charge. When I put my phone down, I stick them into a charger. Why are your headphones running down? Why doesn't your phone run out of battery?

      If you've got 3 dongles for headphones, why don't you leave a dongle attached to one set of headphones so you're never without it? If you're also using it in a device with a 3.5mm jack, you can clip the dongle to the headphone wire. (Frankly, Apple should've made a little clip on the dongle so you wouldn't have to use a bit of string or a rubber band for this.)

      My listening habits haven't changed at all—if anything, I listen to more things on my phone because I can leave it in the kitchen and wander around my apartment with no pants on and still hear my podcasts.

      I think Apple needs to start putting wireless headphones in the box, honestly. They're super cheap to make, apparently, given that I can buy a pair that's lasted 2 years for $25.

    22. Re:Does it matter? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      The point is to eliminate all the external ports of the phone. Then the case will be sealed and the phone will be waterproof. A great achievement, millions of phones are lost every year due to water damage. Apple is leading the way, as usual.

      Nope.

      Two major things drive this move.

      1. Size/space/cost savings.

      2. Closing the "analog hole" in hopes of securing better deals from the music industry for iTunes content. (RIAA is deathly afraid somebody will hook up an eight-track tape recording deck to the headphone jack.)

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    23. Re:Does it matter? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Why do you even NEED to listen to music? It will only distract you from looking at your beautiful iPhone!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:Does it matter? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Fool. Lil Wayne already figured out how to make a phone waterproof! Just label it "Samsung"...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    25. Re:Does it matter? by Falos · · Score: 1

      Or the car. Or just walking down the street, or waiting in line, or in the dentist's lobby. Pull it out and watch some Firefly, even. VLC has picture-in-picture, so I can use my phone while I do.

      My first flip phone needed one of those 2.5mm lines to allow me to enjoy mp3s and watch Invader Zim avis on a tiny screen. I was delighted when my blackberry perl had a 3.5mm, everyone was when phones finally started allowing ordinary headphones.

      And you'll have to fucking take them from my cold dead claws.

    26. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buahahahaha....and they say my jokes are bad.

      Immigrate, my son!

      Signed
      The duchman who has 44000 km commute by bike while always listening to music using buds.

      The issue is that countries without proper bike infrastructure insist on having very expensive gear to ride lije helmets, reflecting jackets etc. And I can understand that....to a point. Oh...that and the good ol 'pass a law, make a business'

    27. Re:Does it matter? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      My case includes a 3.5mm port via a cutout. It's rubber and such. No electronics necessary.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    28. Re:Does it matter? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      its a fucking pain in the ass.

      between my bluetooth headphones running out of battery and having to own 3 extra dongles, which i often forget, including a splitter so i can charge my iphone whilst listening to music, i quantifiably listen to less music now that apple has done this.

      If you have 3 lightning adapters and STILL have problems not having them when you need them; then I suggest the real problem is not with the phone...

    29. Re:Does it matter? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      > i quantifiably listen to less music now that apple has done this.

      I listen to just as much. Because, y'know I have an Android tablet with a headphone jack. Super handy for coming into the office loaded up with tunes and just plugging a line in cable into and hitting play. Can't do that with any non-headphone jack device.

      Right. Because the world has not yet invented Bluetooth headphones and speakers.

      Riiiight.

    30. Re:Does it matter? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure wearing headphones while cycling is illegal almost everywhere.

      What? They don't allow deaf people to cycle?

      What's the difference? At least my state has consistently come to that common-sense conclusion.

    31. Re:Does it matter? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      I listen to music in my headset at the office since we also use softphones and IM for inter-team communication. External speakers would not be an option. And the desktops do not have bluetooth receivers, so again, not happening.

      Perhaps you should try to envision use cases other than your own?

    32. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its a fucking pain in the ass.

      If your phone is a pain in your ass, you're holding it wrong. You might want to see a proctologist.

    33. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you use the same headphones on the phone and on the desktop/laptop? You'll have to remove and re-add the dongle every time. And buying two sets of headphones just for this is counterproductive. You would be better of with a more expensive single set of headphones.

    34. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whattttttt?

    35. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't. He's an Apple fanboy thru and thru. He's one of those "you are holding it wrong" people.

      He truly believes that anything Apple does, is superior, no matter what.

      Tell him it doesn't fit your use case, he will reply with "you are using it wrong".

      Ignore him. He just talks to hear himself talk at this point.

    36. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here we go again folks. Let's blame the user and not Apple.

      Let's recap. Before they got rid of the headphone jack, he had no issue. Just plugging in his phones and he's ready. Now, apple removed the jack, people lose their dongles, yet somehow, out of nowhere, it is now somehow HIS fault.

      Apple fanboy logic. Never apples fault, always the users fault.

      Come on big boy; is this all you got. Keep it coming. I'm enjoying this.

    37. Re: Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea because those two things are exactly the same.

      Another fucking strawman from the resident Apple fanboy.

      What else ya got? I'm not done roasting you yet.

    38. Re:Does it matter? by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      try plugging in your headset while charging the phone, then you will understand why you need dongles.

      1) Plug the charger lead into the phone.
      2) Put on your Bluetooth headphones.
      3) Listen to music while the phone charges, no dongle.

      I don't see the problem.

    39. Re:Does it matter? by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Up until last year, there was a flagship class phone with a removable battery (+SD card and headphone jack); the LG V20. I'm still using one; it's great, and no thicker than some phones without a removable battery (and only 1/10th of a mm thicker than an iPhone 8+). Unfortunately it didn't sell well, and LG inexplicably seems to think that means 'people don't want a removable battery', so it's gone from the V30. It's really a trend; when something doesn't sell companies take it to mean there's no demand for this or that great feature, when that really has little to do with it. Then some other phone that removed that feature sells well, and the fate is sealed, even though the removal of the feature wasn't why it sold. Oh well, at least there's still Android flagships with headphone jacks. For now.

    40. Re:Does it matter? by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Just curious, what happens when you plug the phone into the PC via USB? Mine sees it as a USB mass storage and I can play audio from there. Also, you had to bring in an audio cable to plug into your device. Also couldn't just bringing in a tiny USB to Bluetooth adapter instead and stream audio that way work roughly the same? I'm not say that's what you *should* do, just curious here, thanks.

    41. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.

    42. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apples $25 bluetooth headphones cost $159 of course.

    43. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Blame the user. Stupid fucking apple worshipper. You are a well trained sheep.

    44. Re:Does it matter? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Not sure, our desktops are locked down centrally by head office so nothing that looks like a mass storage device, like a phone, is allowed a full connection. If we plug in a phone or tablet all it does is charge and we get an angry popup. Nor sure the corporate USB paranoia would let a USB to Bluetooth adapter work either, haven't got one to try. So that's one of the reasons why I use an audio cable from the headphone jack to the line in.

    45. Re: Does it matter? by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. I see. Yes that would be a bit of a problem there. Okay, thanks for the clearing up.

    46. Re:Does it matter? by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      belkin make one

      https://www.belkin.com/us/p/P-...

      i use this plus a dongle but i think they do a version that is lightning split with an audio jack too now

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  7. iPad "Pro"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that kind of like a Speak 'n' Spell "Pro"?

    1. Re:iPad "Pro"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's almost no difference between the iPad Pro and an Etch-A-Sketch, except the price.

      Until the iPad "Pro" supports a mouse, it's useless outside kindergartens and Starbucks.

  8. Alternative yet similar headline by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Apple CEO lost his mind and needs a shrink, says report.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re: Alternative yet similar headline by houghi · · Score: 1

      I thout he died a while ago and had already lost his mind. But as people worship him, perhaps he has Rizen again.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re: Alternative yet similar headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD practice witchcraft?

      Rise chicken rise!!! Chicken rise!!!! Rise chicken rise!!!

  9. It takes courage to resell existing features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes courage to sell something which was included in previous hardware iterations. It's kind of genius move on Apples part when people accept that they now have to buy extra dongles and also lose ability to charge the system while using the headphones which makes earlier replacement of hardware inevitable. Before at least the devices could be used with external audio hooked into charger but now that's gone.

    Guess that people still need the headphone jack and are even willing pay extra for it:
    https://www.macrumors.com/2018/06/27/apple-headphone-jack-adapter-top-seller-best-buy/

  10. Well there's a sure fire way of me never buying 1 by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Informative

    and I have owned every single ipad obsessively for the past 4 generations (great resale value)

    I do not subscribe to this bluetooth idiocy. I do not need a thinner ipad. I wouldn't mind the smaller bezel, I wouldn't mind it closer to 16:9. I wouldn't mind an OLED display for true blacks or even better camera / speakers. But overall I'm fairly happy with my ipad Pro 10.5 but I'll be if you think I'll upgrade for a unit with no headphone jack.

    I find the lack of a thumb pad / home button already fairly offensive but the headphone jack on a device like that? Which people use on planes? Hell, god damned no.

    Nope.

  11. Dock vertically? No way. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    If that happened, Apple would basically be negatively impacting usability simply because it can’t solve an engineering problem.

    There’s a reason 95% of monitors are used in landscape mode... so I can’t believe this rumor. But I almost want this to happen just so I can hear the logical contortions Schiller, Ive, and company attempt to make - perhaps Schiller will dust off his “can’t innovate, my ass!” line again.

    Meanwhile, my 6S’s TouchID still works sideways and even upside down.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Dock vertically? No way. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Apple would basically be negatively impacting usability simply because it canâ(TM)t solve an engineering problem.

      Like making something that's extremely finicky about how you hold it? Say it isn't so!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Dock vertically? No way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems like a super stupid move on Apple's part. I have a 9.7" Pro that spends most of its time locked in a clamshell keyboard case horizontally. It's great for packing around and doing some writing when I have a free moment. Lighter than most laptops, and stupendous battery time. I can't see a vertical keyboard being this close to full size, and my fat fingers really don't like working with chicklet sized keys. And the screen orientation would be ridiculous for working with on a regular basis.

      And how in the ever loving hell could they NOT throw in the ability for face scans to be done properly in any orientation? That to me seems like one of the dumber moves they've made in a long list of dumb moves over the past few years.

      Removing the headphone jack is one more slap to the face.

      I'm thinking I may be on my last round of Apple products at this point. Unless they about face and start actually building machines I want instead of trying to cram shitty ideas down our throats, I'll be switching back to other vendors for my computer/phone/tablet needs.

    3. Re:Dock vertically? No way. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      And how in the ever loving hell could they NOT throw in the ability for face scans to be done properly in any orientation?

      It comes down to the physical placement of the sensor.

      Think about it. Without some sort of super-fancy pan/tilt mechanism built into the FaceID Illuminator AND camera, it really isn't practical, especially for the Illuminator.

      And can you imagine the increase in acquisition/identification time as the device has to "hunt-around" for your face?

      No thanks.

    4. Re:Dock vertically? No way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think you convinced him shill.

  12. What's a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *pushes up hipster glasses*

  13. Poem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone do that poem "first they came for the..." but using headphone jacks? I'm not clever enough.

    1. Re:Poem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they came for the Jews... but they didn't gas enough of them.

    2. Re:Poem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They ran out Jews to slaughter actually. The only way they could have murdered more Jews is if they conquered more lands. But the National Socialists didn't go for the Jews first, they went for the leaders of opposing political parties first, imprisoning them, executing them, or just summarily murdering them - not very nice stuff.

  14. If I Wasn't Already Boycotting... by rally2xs · · Score: 2

    ...things Apple for their scurrilous business practices (If you have to ask, you just haven't been paying attention...) I would not be buying something without a headphone jack.

  15. Another interesting feature of the new iPad versio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A feature of the upcoming iPad Pro update is that it will feature the ability not to be bought by me. That means one more for you, if, of course, you do not mind buying a defective-by-design piece of shit that is missing a headphone jack. Have too much money and not enough brains? Consider the new upcoming iPad Pro.

  16. Towards devices without connectors by Camembert · · Score: 2

    Well, it is a rumor, lets see (probably) in September what will be true. FaceID only working vertically would be a bit of a pain, considering that Apple, like them or not, tend to aim for simplicity it looks well possible that this rumor won't happen.
    Regarding the headphone jack, yeah it is a bit annoying though the little dongle which you can leave attached to your favourite cans is not that much of a burden, and I also have the impression that the Airpods are being used by more and more people (I may adopt them once they come with noise reduction, currently use a wired Bose headphone with that functionality). So, not that many customers will be lost I think.
    I expect that a bigger change will come in 2-3 years: phones and tablets without any physical connectors (charging would be wireless). Not only by Apple but I expect all the main makers. A feature that would actually help privacy but of course wired cans and data transfers will be impossible as well.

    1. Re:Towards devices without connectors by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If they were removing all the ports, that would make sense. But they aren't. They are only abusing customers. It wasn't actually necessary to take the phone jack away to make a smaller iPhone, and this decision only makes sense in light of that decision. It's abuse following abuse.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Re: Well there's a sure fire way of me never buyin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donâ(TM)t worry. The headphone jack on my 10.5â iPad Pro purchased in Dec is already bad.

    This is all the fault of Apple care. No one used to buy it so they have made it mandatory by lowering the quality of their products. Things like earphone jacks break the day before the included warranty expires, just like with Dells non latitude laptops.

    I just got an iPhone 8+ because Best Buy had buy one get one free and I no longer care if I have the premier phone available....but this is it for Apple for me. The iPad Pro and the new iPhone will be made intentionally obsolete by Apple around the same time. At that time Iâ(TM)m going to use my laptop instead of a tablet like I used to, buy whatever the equivalent of a Moto x4 is for $200, and thatâ(TM)s it.

  18. Simple solution by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    Just play all your music / phone conversations out loud. I'm sure everyone around you won't mind listening to the latest pop hit or whether you'll have time to pick up the dog's worming tablets after work tonight.

  19. Apple, what's your excuse this time... by geekmux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple, your excuse last time for removing the headphone jack was to make room and meet the demand of being able to essentially waterproof the hardware.

    What's your bullshit excuse this time? iPad Pro customers were actually demanding a smaller bezel? They asked to remove the headphone jack? Spin me another tall tale, O' Faithful master of the Proprietary, because you sure as shit can't offer me any proof that people asked for this.

    You call it "courage". I call it Corporate Arrogance. And I hope you eventually learn that not listening to the customer is not the way to do business.

    1. Re:Apple, what's your excuse this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waterproofing is important for the same reason as round corners, as a significant portion of the users stick them up their arses all the time.
      Posted from my (virgin) IPad.

    2. Re:Apple, what's your excuse this time... by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      And Sony have been doing waterproof devices with a 3.5mm headphone jack, including phones since the 1980's.

    3. Re:Apple, what's your excuse this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To sell more of those God awful- stupid looking earpods. It's apple; why allow people to user their existing tech when you can maybe make them buy new crap.

    4. Re: Apple, what's your excuse this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of waterproof devices have external connectors. Just because Apple doesn't know how to do it doesn't make it impossible.

    5. Re:Apple, what's your excuse this time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't the excuse last time 'courage'?

    6. Re:Apple, what's your excuse this time... by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

      Uniformity, I imagine. It makes their products look more alike to consumers and lets them use the same hardware across their lines, which probably drops their costs slightly.

      --
      When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
    7. Re:Apple, what's your excuse this time... by danomac · · Score: 1

      I just had to replace my phone. I couldn't find any with a removable battery anymore, but the LG G7 I have now is IP68 certified, and guess what? It has a headphone jack...

  20. Surely they can make it even thinner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about 1mm thick? Because that's what everybody is obviously asking for.

    1. Re:Surely they can make it even thinner? by JcMorin · · Score: 1

      Maybe it could be like a piece a of paper?

  21. Form over function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how that would work is vague at the moment.

    Working is of little concern. This is Apple. How it looks is all that matters.

  22. The Next iPad consumer base will Shrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Next iPad consumer base will Shrink and they will loose their "shit" over the lack of a headphone jack

  23. Closing the analog (ass) hole by Laxator2 · · Score: 2

    Looks like the whole idiocy of closing the analog hole is alive and well, and here is matches with the only way Tim Cook can keep the earnings up to the shareholder expectations: charge for access to the Apple devices.
    Also, he is backed into a corner by the company's previous financial success.

    Rest assured that the only headphones that will work with the iPad will be Apple's own and will cost accordingly. Same with all the proprietary connectors on the Mac. All the dongles and adapters cost a fortune.

    It was an Apple executive who said "Next time there will be no Xerox". Well, that next time is now.

    1. Re:Closing the analog (ass) hole by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Looks like the whole idiocy of closing the analog hole is alive and well,

      Don't put conspiracy theories in places which could more easily be explained by standard business practices. There's not "analog hole" to close in the headphone / audio world because the very signal that is required to create pressure waves is ideal for running right into recording equipment at high quality.

      Or pay $9 for a lightning to analogue hole adapter.

      More accurately: His Cookness owns a company that produces a fuckload of poor quality bluetooth headphones and speakers and wants to force his customers down the path of more bluetooth.

  24. Why allow wireless charging? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

    The charger outlet is one of the parts that tend to die in many phones and tablets, forcing people to buy a new one. Why allow wireless charging and hurt that wonderful revenue stream?

    1. Re: Why allow wireless charging? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I use an android and started to have issues with the USB charging. Bought magnetic cables and loved them so much I now use it where I can.
      Having a cable at home and at work and in the car, connecting and disconnicting to charge has never been easier. No more fumbling or being afraid it breaks. You can have Aplle, usb b and usb c heads that you leave on the device.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  25. Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple continues their paralysis as their version of innovation is merely making small incremental changes to capacity, processor, camera - or taking ports away. That's not being brave, it's screwing your customer and we're sick of it.
    They're missing the boat and should visit Tokyo and see the all out frenzy over portable music players (DAP, DACs, etc) because phones simply aren't delivering quality music.
    LG got it right with their V30 / V35 phones which are high quality audio devices and other manufacturers are catching on. Microsoft will soon release a new device that will be a game changer and Apple is over here saying "Let's move the keyboard connection to the side. Brilliant innovation!"

    1. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by Tsolias · · Score: 1

      apple hasn't innovated... like ever.
      https://i.amz.mshcdn.com/JT2mt...
      https://i.pinimg.com/originals...
      I know that job's mob, just like hilary's mob, will troll-mod me, but hey, here's the truth.
      Deal with it.

    2. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And dont forget this classic

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFeC25BM9E0

    3. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      iOS does not suppotr Aptx/AptxHD nor does it support LDAC. Android supports both. You can play high res (24/96 or higher) and DSD on Android - not on iOS. Apple doesn't really care about high quality audio for portable applications...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    4. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      iOS does not suppotr Aptx/AptxHD nor does it support LDAC. Android supports both. You can play high res (24/96 or higher) and DSD on Android - not on iOS. Apple doesn't really care about high quality audio for portable applications...

      I am a BIG fan of high bitrate/bit-depth audio at home. I have a medium-sized DVD-A collection and an Oppo DVD/DVD-A Player to play them on. So, suffice it to say that I understand the advantages of high-fidelity digital audio recording and playback.

      HOWEVER, there is not ONE human being on this planet, and quite frankly, few DOGS, that can distinguish a Meridian Lossless 24/96 playback in a MOBILE setting from anything over a 160 kB/sec AAC-encoded version. And MOST people, including "golden ears" types, cannot even distinguish 128 k AAC from non-encoded PCM or even analog, in an A/B/X listening test. It's been proven time and again.

      So, Apple's decision to not LICENSE AptX for iOS is a QUITE reasonable one.

    5. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So I have to have my files in two different encodings? Hi res for home, and low res for mobile? Really? That's what you consider "it just works"? Why not make iOS support high resolution files? Why not support AptX (which includes low latency, so you don't get 60+ msec of latency when watching movies) on iOS, since macOS supports AptX? Oh - that's right, Apple didn't use the CSR chipsets in the iPhone...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So I have to have my files in two different encodings? Hi res for home, and low res for mobile? Really? That's what you consider "it just works"? Why not make iOS support high resolution files? Why not support AptX (which includes low latency, so you don't get 60+ msec of latency when watching movies) on iOS, since macOS supports AptX? Oh - that's right, Apple didn't use the CSR chipsets in the iPhone...

      iTunes will export low-bitrate copies of your tracks to your mobile device. They have done that for years, now.

      I can't find anything to support a latency of 60ms + on iOS. That much delay would also be VERY visible to almost everybody.

    7. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Here you go. AAC is simply a different codec running on the SBC channel of Bluetooth audio. Latency up to several hundred milliseconds.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you install a third party music player? Even if aptx is a lost cause, I don't see why software couldn't just play your 24/96, convert it on the fly to 16/48 and output that to the iOS sound stack.
      No one gives a shit about keeping the 96 till the end, unless you have music for dogs and bats. It's all snake oil. They sell you good sounding 24/96 and DSD music, and have you believe it's because of the 24/96 and DSD. It's psychological, the car analogy is : I'm telling you your car's suspension were made by Porsche, you're impressed and find out how great the car's handling is - no matter that I lied to you. What it's good for is tying you to a store that sells 24/96 or DSD.

      Now, TheFakeTimCook is full of shit. 128k AAC sounds about the same as 128k mp3, it's not good. Often good enough, just not actually good, whereas 16/48 is actually good.

    9. Re: Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, "I can't tell the difference so neither should you"

      Apples resident fanboy saying you are holding it wrong again. "I can't tell the difference so Apple is justified in not adding it."

      Yep, another strawman from the Apple cockholder himself.

    10. Re: Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are they exporting something they don't support. Do tell.

      He must be holding it wrong right? You gotta hold it a certain way for the audio to work.

      Also, see below, there are options, you are just so far stuck up apples ass you can't see them because they aren't made by Apple.

    11. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Here you go. AAC is simply a different codec running on the SBC channel of Bluetooth audio. Latency up to several hundred milliseconds.

      AAC does NOT run on SBC. SBC is it's own thing, just like AAC and AptX.

      You're an idiot if you don't see that that "article" is deliberately vague.

    12. Re:Apple hasn't innovated since Jobs by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Learn how audio channels are sent. AAC uses the same protocol and packet size as SBC and thus has the same latency. Aptx has different packet sizing so it can send more information with the same latency as SBC/AAC - and Aptx LL sends smaller packets so the latency is less. But you're an ignorant fool who's an Apple tool, so - no surprise.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  26. Re:Well there's a sure fire way of me never buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironically, I find Bluetooth noise cancelling headphones awesome on planes. Cords suck on planes for getting snagged.

  27. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'd love to listen to music, but I forgot to (charge my headphones|grab the right digital adapter dongle)," said a whole bunch of rich, stupid, shortsighted trendhumpers.

  28. Stupid continues by markdavis · · Score: 2

    >"The Next iPad Pros Will Shrink and Lose Their Headphone Jacks"

    No, they won't just shrink, they will just get thinner- smaller batteries to be thinner, more fragile, harder to hold, more impossible to repair, less cooling mass, and more stupid. Next up, delete ALL physical ports and rely only on wireless charging, making sure there is no way to easily connect ANYTHING to the device. Oh, might as well delete the "useless" speakers and mic, too, and force people to use only wireless headphones and wireless mic...

    1. Re:Stupid continues by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      That was more or less what I was going to post. By making the ipad thinner, Apple makes it so that you will need a case for it...like you do for the iphone. Of course, in order to make the phone, or tablet, as durable as previous, thicker versions you need to put a case on it which makes it thicker than those previous versions. And the case that makes it as durable as those previous versions with a case makes the new, thinner iphone as thick as those previous versions were in their cases.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Stupid continues by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      These tablets with mobile OSs are probably on the way out. I bought what is basically a HP clone of a Surface on clearance and while the battery life isn't great, it is a full Intel i7 powered computer in tablet form. I'm not sure how hard it'd be to put Linux on one of these PCs, but they are only going to get better and they remove the use case for "basically a really big phone" style tablets.

    3. Re:Stupid continues by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      A thinner, lighter iPad is actually easier to hold. I went from an iPad 3 to a 2017 iPad, and it's a lot better. The thing with an iPad over a phone is that it's quite long and wide, making a much greater moment of inertia, so even a light object can cause wrist strain over time.

      As long as the battery life stays the same, I've got no problem with this, especially for the iPad Pro. We're looking to buy the 12" one this year, and the lighter it is, the better.

    4. Re:Stupid continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost me (and nearly everyone who owns an iPad) at "battery life isn't great".
      Approximately nobody wants Linux on a tablet.

    5. Re:Stupid continues by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      The reason to contrast the battery life (about 8 hours) is because that's where they'll need to improve before it would replace all the iPad use cases. Plus side, it charges off of USB-C vs some proprietary crap. As for Linux, this is Slashdot; had I been discussing TI graphing calculators someone would want to know if it'd run Linux.

    6. Re:Stupid continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battery life is all it needs to "replace all iPad use cases"? I don't think you much of a grasp on why most people buy iPads, or how they use them. Strong retail support matters. Ease of use matters. A UI that clumsily attempts to combine touch and mouse/pointer is not an advantage, it is a hack that appeals to a narrow band of taste-impaired neckbeards.

      Approximately nobody cares about lightning vs USB C. Except that Lightning works, but USB C is a bag of hurt. And most people who buy iPads already have Lightning cables and devices.

  29. What to worry about by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While end-users do not seem to have picked up on this yet, "biometric" authentication is a security failure, and face recognition makes it even worse.

    That's a bit like claiming that door locks on the front of your house are a security failure because they can be defeated. Most people at most times don't actually need or want strong security - they are just keeping out the casual snoopers. You're quite right that if you are serious about security it isn't enough by itself but for most people they don't need more than this. The good news is that you can enable other features (like requiring pass codes) to make it more secure.

    I warned about this long ago.

    So did lots of others. We're aware.

    If you think it's bad someone can get your fingerprint while you sleep, wait until it's your face.

    Is this a big problem where you live? Are you a secret agent? If I have to be worried about someone being in my house while I sleep I'm worried about them BEING IN MY HOUSE, not using my iPad. Seriously, let's worry about actual problems before we worry about the ones from a James Bond film.

    1. Re:What to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have kids, do you?

  30. Real world usage? by sjbe · · Score: 0

    between my bluetooth headphones running out of battery

    How much music are you listening to that you drain the batteries and can't take a few minutes to recharge? A pair of airpods charges for 3-5 hours of playback in 15 minutes. I'm sure the competitors are similar if you don't like Apple's offering. Heck you can listen with one in while the other charges if you really bear to stop listening for a few minutes. Plus there are bluetooth receivers if you prefer wired headphones for whatever reason.

    and having to own 3 extra dongles

    What are you doing that requires three different dongles on a routine basis? Not being snide, just genuinely curious. I have one for a headphone jack that I've used precisely once in the last year and a half and I have a lighting to USB for transferring pictures from my SLR camera that I use now and then. But really most things can be done wireless unless you are being obstinate about the method you connect with.

    1. Re:Real world usage? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      A lot of people (myself included) like to plug in if they are sitting at a desk, period. Why take the chance of running out of battery later in the day? Maybe you're going to go home and go for a run and you need almost a full charge to run the GPS. Also, I listen to audio books at night.. So when to charge then?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Real world usage? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      A lot of people (myself included) like to plug in if they are sitting at a desk, period. Why take the chance of running out of battery later in the day? Maybe you're going to go home and go for a run and you need almost a full charge to run the GPS. Also, I listen to audio books at night.. So when to charge then?

      So, throw a lightning to 3.5 mm adapter in your desk and one in your backpack, and you should be good to go.

      First world problems.

    3. Re:Real world usage? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Oh FFS stop with the excessive dongle is a "solution" bullshit. We don't need more fucking dongles; we need LESS of them.

      Nice straw man of "first world problems" -- the fucking problem was CREATED by Apple, not us. We were able to both listen AND charge our phones with the previous phone(s). We _already_ have wired headphones that work -- we don't need to buy overpriced, crappy, wireless ones.

      Quite astroturfing already.

    4. Re: Real world usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here we go again folks. Just buy a dongle for every place you listen to music, problem solved.

      Once again, a problem created by Apple, to sell dongles and make more money. And this guy says "just buy a couple for each place you listen to music".

      Because that is totally a practical solution.

      Keep me coming, imma roast you every time you post.

  31. Cases by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Dropping the 3.5mm port didn't affect iPhones because everyone buys a case and a lot of those started including 3.5mm ports.

    Which actually makes a lot more sense when you think about it. Not everyone actually needs/wants a 3.5mm port (I have no use for it) but almost everyone buys a case. Therefore it actually makes sense to move that functionality to the case for those who want it and to free those who don't need it from an unnecessary port. If you really want a 3.5mm port that's cool but in the unix philosophy I prefer to add complexity through add on modules rather than to bake it into the core product whether or not it is actually needed.

    I don't know how popular iPad cases are, but I bet a number of people are going to start buying them.

    What I wonder is why Apple doesn't take the cases more seriously. Their case offerings amount to little more than afterthoughts and badly designed ones at that for the most part. They introduce the Apple Pencil but provide no place to store it. Their screen protectors are clumsy sloppy afterthroughts. Their battery cases are terrible designs. It would make a lot of sense for Apple to make a phone to case interface so cases could be smarter and do more interesting things without the hack of hijacking the lightning port.

    1. Re:Cases by organgtool · · Score: 1

      Only the most loyal of fanboys could advocate for the removal of a feature that doesn't add any significant cost or require a large change in the design. If moving the headphone jack to a case makes so much sense, what advantages does it offer? Do those advantages outweigh the utility of people who don't want to ensnare their device in a case or have to remember to bring an adapter or buy a pair of wireless headphones that also need to be charged?

  32. Apple doesn't care by sjbe · · Score: 0

    I would not be buying something without a headphone jack.

    Given that Apple is selling about 50 million iPhones every quarter I think it is safe to say that you are an outlier with this opinion. That's not to say your opinion is invalid but just that it obviously isn't widely shared. Good news for you is that there are plenty of options other than Apple for you.

    1. Re: Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One by one of the the bricks fall from the castles walls.

  33. A faster horse by sjbe · · Score: 2

    What's your bullshit excuse this time? iPad Pro customers were actually demanding a smaller bezel?

    Henry Ford once said "If I asked my customers what they wanted they would say 'a faster horse' ". Apple hasn't become the Goliath they are by polling customers about what they think they want or by waiting for customers to tell them. Their job is to figure out what their customers need/want before we figure it out. If they fail in this task then Apple will struggle in future years but so far they've done ok. Honestly I think certain people's attachment to the current design (like bezel size) is more of an assumption than a real world requirement. But if I'm wrong then Apple's iPad sales will reflect that so I don't really see it as a problem. They removed most of the bezel from the iPhone X and after having used one for a year it has presented me precisely zero problems. It's reasonable that the same logic might hold for the iPad.

    They asked to remove the headphone jack?

    If the headphone jack is so precious to you there are plenty of options for you to get one on other devices or to add it to Apple devices. If you calm down for a moment it actually makes sense to remove it because not every user needs it. A far more sensible approach is to put the headphone jack on the cases that almost every user adds to their devices anyway. (Apple kind of missed this to be honest but the logic is still there) Think of it kind of like how unix is built. Make the core components as simple and elegant as possible and don't require features that only some will use on the core system.

    Personally I'm fine with the headphone jack being removed since I really didn't use it anyway and clearly I'm not alone it this. When I do use headphones bluetooth ones serve me better anyway. Apple sells 50 million iPhones per quarter so obviously there is a huge customer segment that is good with what they are doing. If your needs are different that's totally fine but Apple has to do what is best for Apple and what they think is best for their customers.

    1. Re:A faster horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple hasn't become the Goliath they are by polling customers about what they think they want or by waiting for customers to tell them.

      The current executive team at Apple didn't make them the Goliath they are either.

      Face it, this is an already successful company raping their customers for further income.

      It's not a new idea, but rather what always happens historically.

    2. Re:A faster horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple hates customers. They are getting rid of pro customers by killing or stalling pro machines. Customers wanted a new mac pro so they made an imac pro instead. Tim can't get desktops or workstations. Apple killed CAD users by deprecated opengl and it's modern equivalents.

      Tim won't be happy until you can only use a mac for facebook. That's his dream. Accept it now and just use facebook.

    3. Re:A faster horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

      With the obvious exception of Steve Jobs, the company's senior management is almost completely the same set of guys.

      Cook, Schiller, Riccio, and Williams have all been there since 1998. Cue and Ive even longer. Federighi was there for most of the 2000s, left briefly, and then returned. Srouji about 10 years.

  34. Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is so "oh I don't give a singing duck about it".

  35. About time by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Just the other day I was complaining about too much choice in the headphone market. By systematically eliminating all the wired options this is positively awesome for consumers. Apple helping simplify technology yet again.

    And in case anyone doesn't see that for the obvious sarcasm it is, extend your right hand, make a fist, and then as quickly as possible move your clenched fist to the back of your head in a straight line.

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon Apple will be able to eliminate all I/O from their devices. In the mean time, try the MacBook Wheel:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA

  36. Vertical keyboard? by countach · · Score: 1

    I hope Apple isn't going to a vertical keyboard. This would be incredibly stupid for a number of reasons. One being that video watching is a major use (maybe even THE use case), and vertical would suck.

    The excuse given for iPhone 7 that the case isn't big enough for headphones doesn't wash either. Apple's minimalism is going too far, and I'm not sure how much more I can stomach.

    1. Re:Vertical keyboard? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Actually, they figured out a better way - alphabetize the keyboard! That QWERTY (or if you're a weirdo - DVORAK!) thing requires users to MEMORIZE stuff! Terrible! Just list the numbers from 0 to 9, then A to Z, then a to z, then .,/?"';;[]{}()~!@#%$*&^()+_-=\|` and you're set! It is EXACTLY 100 symbols, so you can lay them out in a nice, easy-to-use 10 x 10 grid! Typing has never been easier!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  37. Maybe they should scrap the "pro" then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep lets loose the headphone jack and still call it a "pro" device. Makes sense in Apple's distorted view of what a "pro" device is all about. Someone at Apple must loose sleep at night because a device has way too many ugly ports on them. Yeah Mac's are just pretty and dysfunctional products anymore. Steve Jobs would be appalled at how Apple has sided with a boutique line up these days.

    1. Re:Maybe they should scrap the "pro" then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could lose an "o" in "loose".

  38. Time to charge by sjbe · · Score: 1

    A lot of people (myself included) like to plug in if they are sitting at a desk, period.

    Which is fine but I'm curious why wireless earphones isn't a viable option for this?

    Why take the chance of running out of battery later in the day?

    Multiple solutions to this if it is something you are genuinely worried about. And frankly I've never needed to charge my phone more than once mid-day even with near continuous usage unless the battery was dying. And bluetooth headphones last hours at a stretch and recharge in minutes.

    Maybe you're going to go home and go for a run and you need almost a full charge to run the GPS.

    That's a pretty darn long run! Though you do know that you do not need a GPS to go for a run, right?

    Also, I listen to audio books at night.. So when to charge then?

    During your commute. During meetings. During meals. With a battery pack while on the go. While you sleep. There are fast charge options available for the iPhone - for $ of course which can charge a phone roughly 50% in 30 minutes. Are you seriously going to claim that you use your device so much that you never have time to charge? If you want to use a wired set so you don't have to bother I don't buy claims that you can't find time to charge.

    1. Re:Time to charge by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      In a meeting? So while everyone is filing in and finding a seat I'm supposed to be fiddling with a plug? I'm really tired of this "fuck you, you can make your life more complicated for the sake of technology" mantra. Technology is supposed to make our lives simpler, ESPECIALLY Apple. That's why they get paid the big bucks, after all.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Time to charge by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Wireless headphones have to be charged every night. I don't want another thing to charge, and I don't buy expensive electronics with disposiblity built in. I have a family with lots of devices and we have enough to charge already.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Time to charge by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      In a meeting? So while everyone is filing in and finding a seat I'm supposed to be fiddling with a plug? I'm really tired of this "fuck you, you can make your life more complicated for the sake of technology" mantra. Technology is supposed to make our lives simpler, ESPECIALLY Apple. That's why they get paid the big bucks, after all.

      And WE'RE all tired of you manufacturing improbable scenarios (need GPS for a RUN?!? Puh-lease!) in a desparate attempt to find problems where none ACTUALLY exist.

    4. Re:Time to charge by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Wireless headphones have to be charged every night. I don't want another thing to charge, and I don't buy expensive electronics with disposiblity built in. I have a family with lots of devices and we have enough to charge already.

      So, statistically, one more device shouldn't impact your routine much at all.

    5. Re:Time to charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, are you telling us all these fucking phones are useless in the end?
      We've just established that all these fitness apps, fitbit etc. are useless, at least the part about tracking distances/route taken.
      I hope you'll come up with other uses and scenarios that are officially deemed a waste of time. Then we will get rid of all the computer phones altogether.

    6. Re: Time to charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did I say. "You are using it wrong"

      This guy just can't envision using a device in a way Apple doesn't deem fit. If Apple doesn't bless it, this guy is against it.

      So kindly ignore him, he offers nothing of value of conversations.

      If you use something in a way that he doesn't use, you are wrong, and it's your fault. Never apples fault. Never.

      TLDR: he's a toy. Ignore him.

    7. Re: Time to charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here we go again.

      Another use case that doesn't fit your mold.

      Oh just buy one more device, it won't hurt.

      Yea, it does, the shit adds up quick.

      So once again, just because YOU will bend over backwards to let Apple fuck you, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.

      Keep posting, so I can keep calling your bitch ass out.

    8. Re:Time to charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the only person WE are TIRED of HERE is YOU.
      Stop making fucking excuses for apples bullshit.
      Just because YOU are willing to compromise the way you use your phone to bend to apples will DOES NOT make us all mindless puppets of apple.
      FUCK OFF

    9. Re:Time to charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistically; you are an ass.

  39. Apple executives by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The current executive team at Apple didn't make them the Goliath they are either.

    Yeah actually they did. It's mostly the same people. There has been some turnover of course but a lot of the same players are still there and have been there a long time. If you think Steve Jobs did it all by his lonesome then you don't know how actual companies work in the real world. Tim Cook has been a high level executive since 1998. Jon Ivey has been there since 1992 and has been head of design since 1997. Lots of the other senior management has been there similar lengths of time.

  40. Still have my 2nd gen. by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

    and feel no need to upgrade.

  41. Wow. huge changes in dimension by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
    Normally we only see these huge changes in dimension like this between the variations of the same model of other manufacturers.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    15 model variants of the Galaxy S III - Dimensions; 136.6-139,0 mm × 70.6-71.0 mm × 8.6-9.4 mm

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  42. Technological Homeopathy by PPH · · Score: 1

    Less and less is better. Until an empty iPad box gives you the full effect.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  43. BIG!Pro by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    Apple retreats its BIG analogy naming convention. Small is better. Less risk to breakage, damage and theft.

    Stuff an iPad mini with features like folding keyboard and wireless everything - that's real world Pro.

    Travel requires going places; NOT going BIG. Folding keyboard in a vest pocket, MiniPAD slipped in vest lining pocket; earphones and charge cord/plug stuffed in hand warmers; good worldwide.

    iPad Pro with BIG 10-12" screens are just Huuuge 4x4 SUV's going BIG not going places and getting things done. You can't take them anywhere outside the US. Instantly, you are a target for theft. Break it and good luck getting it fixed too.

  44. Toys by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Apple is making their devices more and more like toys for the techo-addicted to play with. An old headphone jack is too simple. Apple's customers want more gee-gaws to dick around with. That's their customer base.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  45. Re:Well there's a sure fire way of me never buying by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Using OLEDs would probably cut down on the lifespan, and thus resale value, of an iPod./p.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  46. Costs by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Only the most loyal of fanboys could advocate for the removal of a feature that doesn't add any significant cost or require a large change in the design.

    Only the most loyal fanboy's huh? Just because someone doesn't agree with your opinion or preferences doesn't make them an irrational fanboy. I hold the same opinion for Android devices. I think putting the headphone jack on the device doesn't make much sense regardless of who the smartphone maker is. And as long as there are some manufacturers putting it on the base device why do you really care? It makes a lot more sense to put it on the case that the vast majority of people use anyway. Cases are frankly an overlooked opportunity to make the hardware more modular than it currently is.

    When you are producing something in the millions there is no such thing as an insignificant cost. Even something as simple as a headphone jack carries a lot of costs that most people don't even think about. There are engineering, design, tooling, warranty, and opportunity costs just for a start. By eliminating this port Apple eliminates a point of failure, reduces the component cost, makes the engineering and tooling cheaper, and reduces service costs for the inevitable problems in the field. Even if this just saves a few cents per phone at the end of the day that adds up to millions of dollars in profit to Apple since Apple sells hundreds of millions of these things every year. I assure you that fact is not lost on Apple. There is a cost to supporting legacy ports and it's pretty easy to evaluate.

    If moving the headphone jack to a case makes so much sense, what advantages does it offer?

    It offers the advantage of not having an unnecessary port for those who don't want it and it frees up that space to be used for some other purpose on the phone. Personally I'll take a marginally larger battery over a headphone port every time. Since most people add a case to their device anyway it makes sense for people who want the now optional jack to buy a case with the jack built in.

    Do those advantages outweigh the utility of people who don't want to ensnare their device in a case

    You mean all three of them? This isn't really a point of debate.

    or have to remember to bring an adapter or buy a pair of wireless headphones that also need to be charged?

    If you are bringing headphones anyway I doubt you're going to forget. And obviously Apple is targeting people who don't mind charging wireless headphones. If this isn't you then buy something that suits you. You don't have to buy Apple and Apple doesn't have to design their products to suit you.

    1. Re:Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom has a legacy port lol.

      Some people use wireless sound AND need headphone jack by the way. This is because they use the FM radio on their phone.

    2. Re: Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You took a lot of words to say "I like getting fucked by Apple, so should you"

  47. Dat headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMFG, it's .1mm thinner, and no headphone jack - MUST...BUY...NOW!!!!!!111!11one!

    Seriously...who the FUCK is asking for this?

  48. Fuck off with your fucking dongles Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shove them up your ass.

  49. In case no one has figured it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has moved from actively growing its user base to exploiting its user base, such is the way with all publically traded companies. I guess their former mad dictator that I, myself, loved to hate was the only thing holding back the MBAs. Abandon ship.

  50. Customer response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so my interest in the next iPad Pro will also shrink and drop off the next release.

  51. Re:Well there's a sure fire way of me never buying by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    I find the lack of a thumb pad / home button already fairly offensive but the headphone jack on a device like that? Which people use on planes? Hell, god damned no.

    Nope.

    Every airline I've flown with allow Bluetooth these days except at takeoff and landing. The FAA has also rated "short range Bluetooth devices" as safe. Every single serious test I have every seen indicates that interference from electronic devices has zero effects on an aircraft's avionics except maybe (very remote possibility) at takeoff and landing.

  52. Re:Apple users perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your balls should be removed.

  53. Fucking Stupid by bogie · · Score: 1

    User Hostile, nobody wants this. Actively making your product worse just to force users into buy $150 headphones that nobody wants that you have to recharge every day and will be dead in a few years.

    Fucking Stupid

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  54. Re:Apple users perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple all ready has them.

  55. Not to worry by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    They already have lots of snakes and dongles you can purchase, to plug in your "legacy" headphones.