Slashdot Mirror
Does Listening to Music Have a Negative Impact on Creativity? (slashgear.com)
We've all heard the studies. AmiMoJo quotes the health and science editor of Slashgear: A new study has found that listening to music may have a negative impact on creativity. This is contrary to the popular idea that music and creativity often go hand in hand. According to the researchers, the negative impact was found even in cases where the music had a positive impact on mood and was liked by the person listening to it. However, background noise didn't have the same effect...
Unlike music, the noise in a library provided a "steady state" environment, which had less of a disruptive effect on participants. Though studying with background music may not completely obliterate someone's ability to think creatively, the research indicates that you may do your best work without it.
But what do Slashdot's readers think? Do you listen to music when you're working -- or do you prefer the steady sounds of silence? Share your own experiences in the comments.
Does listening to music have a negative impact on creativity?
Unlike music, the noise in a library provided a "steady state" environment, which had less of a disruptive effect on participants. Though studying with background music may not completely obliterate someone's ability to think creatively, the research indicates that you may do your best work without it.
But what do Slashdot's readers think? Do you listen to music when you're working -- or do you prefer the steady sounds of silence? Share your own experiences in the comments.
Does listening to music have a negative impact on creativity?
First dupe!
You told us three days ago.
What next? Is Apple working on future products which will blow us away?
Indeed, these careless "editors" - I use the term as loosely as possible - don't even know what they've already published just days before.
https://entertainment.slashdot...
But reading *cough* certain people's *cough* articles and summaries does rot the brain.
The facade is crumbling.
Or Slashdot editors would have found something new to post.
Have gnu, will travel.
... listening ot music consumes resources that the attention system in the brain needs to focus on the problem at hand. More distraction = less resources. A giant no brainer there. But I guess it's a slow newsday at slashdot.
make up for it
A repeat post of a flawed study.
You're an idiot. And whoever mods you up is also an idiot.
You mean the 50 incessantly jabbering fuckwits in this shitty open office environment?
If I didn't have the music to drown them out, the only creative work I would do would involve figuring out how to kill them all.
Certainly loud and obnoxious sounds would have a detrimental effect on creativity, but soft new age music should promote relaxation and introspection. I find ocean and gentle rain ambient sounds especially inspirational.
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
If the Indian artillery & airstrikes don't get him first.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Makes sense actually. They send your info back to Amazon for a profit.
Maybe it has an impact on memory...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I am old enough to remember when Robert Pirsig's book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance was first published. I think he settled this question well enough back then but there is just no way his message could grow past its apparent obscurity.
Fast forward a few decades and I am helping my girlfriends early-teen sons with their homework. They cannot even conceive of even sitting down to do it without a CD (that era) with some obnoxious bang bang BANG bang noise being distorted out of some nearby speaker. They are bright enough but their concentration is shit for what seems to me to be obvious reason. I can turn it off when I'm there and explain what is going on but the instant I am gone they start up the noise again and they must be entertained. Their grades remained crap and they barely passed high school. I got a serious case of oldfartitis.
Creative work does have a domain where outside stimulus such as favorite music might be helpful. Few musicians create worthwhile new works without listening to what came before. Even cross-genre. Maybe particularly so.
But at some point the passive reception mode has to be changed to forward focus mode. And for that you have to lose the need to be stimulated and focus on the task at hand. It can be hard work.
As Ursula Le Guin once pointed out: many writers make the mistake of confusing feeling creative with actually being creative. She was talking about taking drugs not music but I think it is pretty much the same.
Mueller will.
Yes
- it happens when they CHANGE SOMETHING
Agreed, killing nazi faggots is a PROUD American tradition!
I have found that music interferes with determining courses of action. However, once I know what I have to do, music helps me do it.
A total train-wreck of a sentence.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Mueller's got nothing. It would have leaked by now.
The situation in Japan suggests that Western classical music enhances creativity.
According to a report by France Musique, "as soon as they enter primary school [in Japan], children have several hours of music lessons each week and the subject is as important as mathematics or history are. Moreover, almost [all schools] have their own orchestra with their stock of [musical] instruments." Many such children eventually become the engineers who develop products which are best in their class. Examples of such products include the Honda Accord, the SPARC64 microprocessor, and ivermectin.
I was going to say something, but I forgot what it was. Baby shark doo doo doo
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Paul Manafort is leaking for months into his jumpsuit. He's turning to soup. Trump is the toast.
If I listened to today's pop music I'd feel less intellig....err, creative as well. Beethoven to Pink Floyd however; that's a different story.
So is financing them.
Depends. I create and study and deep think to non-verbal, mostly ambient "music"...electronica...works for me. Sometimes silence and enjoy my actual ambient environment soundscape. In downtown Tokyo.
When some bosses are yelling or some colleagues chit-chatting and laughing loudly, listening to music is the only way to concentrate on work. In these cases, listening to some music is a lesser evil when the alternative is nothing gets done.
Hint: it's an Asian environment - so don't bother asking the bosses and colleagues to tune down their voice.
In general I like quiet. If you want to be creative you want to be able to think about the topic at hand. Not about something else.
The question is not precise. If I need to choose from complete silence and music, perhaps I would choose the silence. In the office enviroment, I choose music to cut off all background sounds.
No links to research methods, sample size or any other data. Complete waste of time reading - why is this even posted as a 'science' item?
Most of what people do involves words, and anything that throws words at you -- like most pop music -- is going to give you cognitive dissonance.
Stick to instrumental music if it's words you need to create. If you're doing something strictly visual, or where the words are already determined, then words in your music probably don't matter so much.
How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
Is when Muzak was started. There's a reason why Muzak music works.
In college I found that I could turn up familiar music* and block out random, distracting noise from the hallway, the neighboring room, and the basketball court outside my window and focus very well on engineering and math homework. Because the music was so familiar it was not noise or a distraction, but completely predictable. (*Led Zeppelin, Rush, The Police, Pink Floyd...)
They acknowledge that there is a difference between different types of sound - so who is to say which sound qualifies as 'music' and which doesn't? And if one type of sound is beneficial and another is malignant, then surely we can expect to observe differences between the creative responses to different TYPES of music, too. Never mind that artists such as John Cage and Brian Eno have published 'music' that bears more than a passing resemblance to background noise, but who is to say whether Mozart has the same impact as Mendelssohn, or even Metallica? It's absurd to make a blanket statement about 'music' in the very same reporting that acknowledges that different kinds of background noise provoke very different responses. It's easy to imagine, for example, that music with lyrical content will be perceived as a different distraction than instrumental music. And it's even easier to imagine that familiar music will provoke a different response than novel music, as one will likely be easier than the other for the brain to ignore. Either the summary of the article on slashdot is woefully inadequate, or else the content of the article is woefully incomplete.
If the music is just "background noise", then no, probably it has no effect. If, however, one actually *listens* to the music, then yes, it will affect creativity negatively. This is because you are listening, not being creative. Active listening takes a lot of effort.