No, I am saying Apple's walled garden is about six inches high. The only bitch one could have is that they do not supply the source code for the OS and Applications they write. Darwin itself is open source though.
Apple has no restrictions on source code. Just download the development kit and compile your own apps from source. Always been that way. Apple is only a walled garden to people who cannot program for themselves.
Nor is being muslim. The term race has no real meaning as you and I both know. Nevertheless, the term is used. Frequently and fluidly so. Where I live and where many people live discrimination on the basis of nationality is considered racism.
What I am pointing out that many of these (at least the older ones) didn't learn from history books but current affairs. They lived through the war and the aftermath trying to sort fact from fiction. Dismissing those experiences entirely leaves you with biased information and attitudes.
Why would I cast a slur at you? I do not think you are looking at the full picture but there are no doubt facts that I am not seeing either. The point of discussion groups used to be that all participants would gain more knowledge not a competition for primacy. I do not know you, you do not even provide a handle for continuity. What you do or have done outside of this thread is unknown to me. I am not in a position to judge and even were I otherwise situated I would be reluctant to do so.
I am not German but English. Old enough to that rationing didn't end until I was 18 years old. However my mother was a 'war bride' so I have relative from both sides. You learn a lot from that. You can keep your 'dumb Germans' racism. He is not only correct where you are mistaken but he is also a better class of human being.
It is only turn the other cheek until they are in control, then they make laws, then they (metaphorically?) burn you at the stake. Remember being religious implies you have no morality only what you think god wants. If you think god wants you to lie then it is moral to do so. If you think god says, kill, then you must.
Trusting the religious to do the right thing? For what flavour of 'right'?
I disagree. This is really conflict about the secular and the religious. Seems to me that the terrorists are largely societies failures. Since when are successful people involved with things like this?
I cannot recall a terrorism case when the perpetrator was not a loser.
left wing terrorists, Muslim terrorists, right wing terrorists; they are all tossers making excuses for their own failures or excesses. It is never going to stop while spoiled people think they are deprived.
I think the Brits just proved that there is nothing wrong in the way in which it deals with firearms. When they are needed they have them. Their laws kept guns away from the terrorists and were available to the police quickly enough to just wipe them out. I would call that a success.
The vote was made on a non-binding referendum. It wasn't 'go right ahead' it was a 'let us consider this'. If it had been advertised as binding the result may not have been the same and assuming that it would be is not democratic.
Slashdot Mirror
It has been free for decades not a couple of years ago.
You sell or provide the source. But isn't open source about about source being open? So what do you want exactly?
You have to understand how to program and you have to be able to beg, borrow or steal a pretty cheap computer. It is a pretty low bar
If they have started charging for the devout, that is new to me. And it runs on a mac mini. Why are you so bigoted?
No, I am just a dumb slashdot poster. I am not part of any elite.
No, I am saying Apple's walled garden is about six inches high. The only bitch one could have is that they do not supply the source code for the OS and Applications they write. Darwin itself is open source though.
Apple has no restrictions on source code. Just download the development kit and compile your own apps from source. Always been that way. Apple is only a walled garden to people who cannot program for themselves.
And if the publisher had provided a patch but the user had not applied it?
I do not want a third party free app for my insulin pump.
Nor is being muslim. The term race has no real meaning as you and I both know. Nevertheless, the term is used. Frequently and fluidly so. Where I live and where many people live discrimination on the basis of nationality is considered racism.
What I am pointing out that many of these (at least the older ones) didn't learn from history books but current affairs. They lived through the war and the aftermath trying to sort fact from fiction. Dismissing those experiences entirely leaves you with biased information and attitudes.
Why would I cast a slur at you? I do not think you are looking at the full picture but there are no doubt facts that I am not seeing either. The point of discussion groups used to be that all participants would gain more knowledge not a competition for primacy. I do not know you, you do not even provide a handle for continuity. What you do or have done outside of this thread is unknown to me. I am not in a position to judge and even were I otherwise situated I would be reluctant to do so.
Fare well anonymous sir
Nope. Fraud. Liberals do not do such things. This isn't a 'true scotsman' fallacy. It is an actual matter of definition.
I am not German but English. Old enough to that rationing didn't end until I was 18 years old. However my mother was a 'war bride' so I have relative from both sides. You learn a lot from that. You can keep your 'dumb Germans' racism. He is not only correct where you are mistaken but he is also a better class of human being.
Understood
I do not contend the legality, I contend the morality.
It is only turn the other cheek until they are in control, then they make laws, then they (metaphorically?) burn you at the stake. Remember being religious implies you have no morality only what you think god wants. If you think god wants you to lie then it is moral to do so. If you think god says, kill, then you must.
Trusting the religious to do the right thing? For what flavour of 'right'?
I disagree. This is really conflict about the secular and the religious. Seems to me that the terrorists are largely societies failures. Since when are successful people involved with things like this?
I cannot recall a terrorism case when the perpetrator was not a loser.
left wing terrorists, Muslim terrorists, right wing terrorists; they are all tossers making excuses for their own failures or excesses. It is never going to stop while spoiled people think they are deprived.
I think the Brits just proved that there is nothing wrong in the way in which it deals with firearms. When they are needed they have them. Their laws kept guns away from the terrorists and were available to the police quickly enough to just wipe them out. I would call that a success.
Reversing the ratio. Would be good but at 40 to 4 they will still lose.
You mean Britain is being the advance party for European authoritarianism?
So does France
The vote was made on a non-binding referendum. It wasn't 'go right ahead' it was a 'let us consider this'. If it had been advertised as binding the result may not have been the same and assuming that it would be is not democratic.
Yes, that is not going very well right now, is it?
Did you not read before you replied or do you not know what lexis/nexis is? Either expresses only ignorance.
You appear to be misinformed