Step 1. Set up several tiers of service (at different price points)
Step 2. In periods of network congestion, drop packets (in a way that is NEUTRAL to the content of the packet) of customers who are in a cheaper tier. (aka "Quality of Service" in networking jargon).
For Step 1, you may wish to gather statistical information then advertise to your customers about what kind of bandwidth customers may expect during congestion and noncongestion hours at each given tier.
Given that git checkins have unique hash signatures, it seems conceptually easy for someone, or a group of someones, to set up an independent website/database tagging checkins and changelogs with additional more information, like "Denial of Service", "exploitable by root", "exploitable by non-root", etc.
Note well that this legislation is still a bill and has not yet been passed into law, so you may still write to your Representative to urge him or her to remove the offending portion.
http://www.house.gov/writerep/
The article shocked me because 10 billion years is a lot longer than I had previously been lead to believe. The key difference is that the article models exploration using non-self-replicating probes. It would be a lot faster with self-replicating probes, even if the rate of self-replication is very slow. One may imagine colonists as biological self-replicating probes.
Slashdot Mirror
Step 1. Set up several tiers of service (at different price points)
Step 2. In periods of network congestion, drop packets (in a way that is NEUTRAL to the content of the packet) of customers who are in a cheaper tier. (aka "Quality of Service" in networking jargon).
For Step 1, you may wish to gather statistical information then advertise to your customers about what kind of bandwidth customers may expect during congestion and noncongestion hours at each given tier.
Here is a torrent of all 51 submissions: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4592403
mogo 3 (downloadable, but not open source) links to libstdc++.so.6.
Given that git checkins have unique hash signatures, it seems conceptually easy for someone, or a group of someones, to set up an independent website/database tagging checkins and changelogs with additional more information, like "Denial of Service", "exploitable by root", "exploitable by non-root", etc.
Note well that this legislation is still a bill and has not yet been passed into law, so you may still write to your Representative to urge him or her to remove the offending portion. http://www.house.gov/writerep/
They don't have the 9 and 10 piece endgame databases available.
I hope they make the proof tree and endgame database available for downloading (probably hundreds of gigabytes).
We know we have missed everything that happened between time 0 and 1 Plank time-units.
The article shocked me because 10 billion years is a lot longer than I had previously been lead to believe. The key difference is that the article models exploration using non-self-replicating probes. It would be a lot faster with self-replicating probes, even if the rate of self-replication is very slow. One may imagine colonists as biological self-replicating probes.
Already-registered (and signed-in) users can (already) edit via tor. And view, of course. You just cannot edit anonymously via tor.