Did you mess up your units or just fail math horribly?
Crazily enough it's accurate enough for purposes of demonstrating relative bandwidth. People naturally have trouble believing it at first because the eyes move so fast without much conscious thought and mind does a great job of tricking itself.
The best way I know of to dispel the illusion human eyesight is focus on this text with your eyes and then try and read something else on the screen without moving your eyeballs. For myself and setup of my display anything more than 6 lines down is illegible without cheating.
Just so I understand a process with global read access to every file on a system is now sandboxed because the people who wrote it are incapable of ensuring their AV parsers are not exploitable?
Now we are to believe the supposed remedy to this is to rely on a sandboxing system orders of magnitude less defensible than the AV software itself?
In the event of successful exploitation of AV but miraculously sandbox works as intended what prevents anything on your system including any inspected network data from being exfiltrated for exploitation by criminal enterprise?
Microsoft created.NET and Checked C... surely it's not beyond their capabilities to design a parser that can't be exploited in the first place.
The naysayers, myself included, are of the opinion that in terms of a general use device, it's just not compelling, it's not what we're asking for (which is impossible at this time), and "3D", which is what this is
VR is about presence not 3D.
If you close one eye and look around you in real life the world doesn't look much different. You can still judge sizes and distances using various visual cues other than stereo parallax.
and graphics cards need to be at least 4-8x if not 16x as fast for that to be viable
Current gen is overkill.
and given the end of moore's law this seems unlikely. Not to mention we also need a wireless solution that can transmit 8k+ per eye in real time, plus enough processing power for head tracking, etc. etc. Unless computers get several orders of magnitude better it seems unlikely that VR will take off any time soon.
Human eyes can only see 1 megapixel with any detail. Total bandwidth of optic nerve weighs in at a whopping 10mbit/s. That's 100 times wired Ethernet, at least 10 times typical 5ghz wireless and 1800 times HDMI 2.0.
The rest is waste. Obviously the necessary and only credible path forward is in improving display systems to be less wasteful.
In the past we've seen some influence efforts full of factually incorrect and misleading information (re JCPOA) on behalf of a foreign power (Israel) without so much as a suggestion of media pushback against it.
If you have to take it all the way down to your racist base you should find a forum more welcoming to that.
Just remember Netanyahu would have Trump's children if he could.
I'm pretty sure corece means " I'm a big powerful google executive, do what I say or you may lose your job / promotion opportunities. I don't really need to say this out loud, you know how it works".
Based on what?
He had a prior sexual relationship with her and according to Rubins ex-wife's divorce complaints Rubin spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on other women for sex during their marriage.
For all you know he simply offered her diamonds and gold.
Coerced sex is sexual assault... At least it is here, maybe in the US there is a different legal term for it.
Coercion by definition is NOT limited to threats of doom and violence. There are many ways to compel people to do what they otherwise wouldn't.
Surely you are not asserting for example buying someone something nice or expensive in exchange for sex is sexual assault in your country?
Why go that extra mile with reckless assumptions invoking "sexual assault" something nobody not even the authors of the articles or anyone else here has done when you have no supporting information to indicate it took place?
When people are reckless with assumptions and accusations and they are proven wrong it has negative impacts on others.
Cameras, assistants that googles shit for you.. all irrelevant noise to me.
Apple is an annoying company because they prioritize crap nobody cares about like artistic monoculture designs, how much shit weighs and being a bunch of pricks (e.g. "courage") over usability, locking people into walled gardens and charges ridiculous prices for mediocre hardware.
The most amusing part of all of this is MOST people walk around with their expensive pretty little works of art iPhones in cheap bulky rubberized cases. Every time I see one... can't help but smile at the absurdity of the whole dynamic.
Expecting Apple users to grow a brain is like expecting Trump supporters to grow a brain. Neither are likely yet both are an entertaining freak show to behold.
Mmkay. So if a right-winger is involved, it's raah feminism, #WeBelieveSurvivors, Handmaid's Tale!
As soon as it's a left-winger, you start debating the meaning of "is"?
If we could harness hypocrisy for clean energy, we would solve global warming tomorrow.
These misunderstandings are common among individuals who elect to stop taking their meds without direction from medical professionals. Never even used a hash tag, spoken about "feminism" or believing. It's all in your head.
It's not like my question is secret information surely the people investigating this and perhaps the media reporting this story have contextual information that directly answers my question.
What am I supposed to believe "coerce" means in the context of this article?
Does coerce mean a promise to buy her a nice dinner later?
Does coerce mean threatening to chop her head off with a dull axe?
Interesting an article that goes on and on about golden parachutes, emails and extraneous drama involving unrelated people providing a history of who fucked who would pay lip service to the most critical aspect of the underlying story in a manner that offers no substantive information about the actual topic of the article to the reader.
The whole issue with Android is the network has no firewall, by default everything gets access to the Internet.
iptables works in Android the same as it does any Linux operating system.
iptables can be used to prevent network access from apps (user accounts) you don't want to access the network. Afwall for example is just a front end to iptables and is very much able to prevent access to the network to apps you don't want to have access.
In permissions it says you are giving the *app* permission, but the app isn't getting permission, the *company* making the app is. The first thing they do is to send all the data you just gave permission for to the parent company's servers.
User space created for the app to execute in is getting the permission.
And the built in apps get a free ride. On a lot of Android devices these days there is shitload of Google spyware, Microsoft spyware, Facebook spyware, and often some Chinese spyware, all pre-installed, all waiting for you to feed in your data to be sent off to parent HQ.
My own personal view it's insane to use an unmodified Android phone with Google play services installed. There are alternatives such as LineageOS which can be configured to at least prevent the OS from stalking you.
Remember 3D movies? Remember how Avatar was promoted relentlessly? 3D was a solution in search of a problem. While it allowed for a nifty new feature that could be sold for more money, it didn't solve a problem. It also had some nasty side effects that bother a lot of people. It didn't take long for 3D to be effectively abandoned. It simply isn't worth the cost to make something in 3D.
I often wonder if those carting out the 3DTV analogies have even once tried a modern 6DOF HMD for themselves.
I expected VR to be like looking thru binoculars or a viewmaster. Basically two big looking screens hanging in front of each eye going into it when I bought it sight unseen. Bzzt was I wrong. Totally completely and utterly not that way at all.
There is no Avator for people to relate to. Instead of buying one piece of technology you are buying one for each person. This makes 3D an expensive experience that can't be shared with anyone else. 3D is destined as a niche product that will never gain widespread consumer acceptance.
Split screen multiplayer and LAN play are an endangered species on consoles and PCs across the board and that royally sucks ass.
Play rec room in VR or meet up on some random planet hundreds of light years away with dozens of other CMDRs in Elite and then come back here and tell us all about how VR experiences can't be shared with anyone else.
Can someone use your technology without looking like an idiot?
No but mocking people wearing HMDs when they can't see you doing it is a lot of fun.
EVE is like CQC portion of Elite but worse and very few Elite players bother with CQC.
I gave my EVE license that came with Rift to someone else. Wasn't interested in trying after seeing videos of gameplay. That and would have had to un-firewall Oculus malware just to play. Not worth it.
Political correctness is a silencing tactic. By designating something political correctness you are saying that it's trivial and unimportant
It's actually more of an ignoring tactic. When you label something or someone PC you are not silencing them you are simply signaling to others what they have to say is not worth listening to or considering.
and therefore the person complaining is just whining.
Yep that's about right.
It really got going in the 80s when people were complaining about things like the building they studied in being named after the guy who owned their great great grandparents.
"I want to avoid causing problems for this person, I'm sure it was an honest mistake, let's diffuse the situation."
There is no need to summarize (and mischaracterize) two whole sentences. You could have just quoted them without playing games.
The first sentence "I for one want to be on the side of defusing this, what about you?"
The second "The last thing I want is to be part of an angry mob running this guy out of his own project."
It appears to clearly imply failure to "defuse this" is connected to an "angry mob".
If you disagree what specifically do you think it says? What else would "angry mob" be referring to? What was the point of including that text if the author didn't believe an angry mob was present or possible?
"LOL SJW bigot mob attacking!!"
I don't know about "bigot" mob. I never said that.
My personal view is central failure of SJW ideology is rooted in a profound lack tolerance for beliefs and sensibilities of others.
Now, after looking at what the author has to say about it, I realize it's not a joke, or a mockery, it is in fact a religious screed put forth in all seriousness. And entirely out of place, if he needs to give a sermon then he should do it in church, or write a song or something.
Either he's mocking you or you are mocking his religious beliefs. Either way you lose.
Now I can see that the author, the original developer, is sincere enough. Just made a mistake. I for one want to be on the side of defusing this, what about you? The last thing I want is to be part of an angry mob running this guy out of his own project.
It's a flippant attempt at a joke, intended to mock the concept of civil interpersonal relations, perhaps because somebody thinks that makes them look cool or smart or edgy or something, but instead sends the clear message "contribute your volunteer effort elsewhere." One word for this: backfire.
It's intended to mock people like yourself.
From anger generated by perpetually miserable SJW crowd I would say it's working as intended.
Slashdot Mirror
It's more than just $$$, it's space. Instead of a discrete quartz crystal somewhere, they can etch a little resonator right on an existing chip.
MEMS are significantly less accurate than quartz and consume much more power.
Did you mess up your units or just fail math horribly?
Crazily enough it's accurate enough for purposes of demonstrating relative bandwidth. People naturally have trouble believing it at first because the eyes move so fast without much conscious thought and mind does a great job of tricking itself.
The best way I know of to dispel the illusion human eyesight is focus on this text with your eyes and then try and read something else on the screen without moving your eyeballs. For myself and setup of my display anything more than 6 lines down is illegible without cheating.
https://www.newscientist.com/a...
Human optic nerve is about 10 mbit/s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Wired ethernet is generally 1000 mbit/s
1000 / 10 = 100
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Actual usable 5ghz wireless people actually get at reasonable distance is something like 100mbit/s.
100 / 10 = 10
https://www.hdmi.org/manufactu...
HDMI 2.0 is 18 gbit/s (18000 mbit/s)
18000 / 10 = 1800
Just so I understand a process with global read access to every file on a system is now sandboxed because the people who wrote it are incapable of ensuring their AV parsers are not exploitable?
Now we are to believe the supposed remedy to this is to rely on a sandboxing system orders of magnitude less defensible than the AV software itself?
In the event of successful exploitation of AV but miraculously sandbox works as intended what prevents anything on your system including any inspected network data from being exfiltrated for exploitation by criminal enterprise?
Microsoft created .NET and Checked C... surely it's not beyond their capabilities to design a parser that can't be exploited in the first place.
Sometime I feel people don't like to embrace change.
Why should they? What's in it for them?
Not the same. Microsoft was a monopoly, and their Windows is still a monoculture, with many applications that run on only that platform.
Every general purpose operating system provides a native ABI unique to that operating system generally not compatible with other operating systems.
What you are saying is no different from asserting iptables won't run on Windows so Linux is a monoculture.
ChromeBooks are different.
Almost everything is done in the browser, and can also be done on a Windows laptop or MacBook. There is no lock-in.
Using a dumb terminal does nothing to prevent lock-in it simply punts the issue.
Give a kid a Windows PC and they learn how to use Windows.
Give a kid a ChromeBook and they learn how to use the Internet.
At least the Windows kid will have learned something they can use later in life.
Nobody looking to be hired for any job writes "I can use the Internet!!" on their resume.
The naysayers, myself included, are of the opinion that in terms of a general use device, it's just not compelling, it's not what we're asking for (which is impossible at this time), and "3D", which is what this is
VR is about presence not 3D.
If you close one eye and look around you in real life the world doesn't look much different. You can still judge sizes and distances using various visual cues other than stereo parallax.
We need 8k per eye,
More like 32k per eye minimum.
and graphics cards need to be at least 4-8x if not 16x as fast for that to be viable
Current gen is overkill.
and given the end of moore's law this seems unlikely. Not to mention we also need a wireless solution that can transmit 8k+ per eye in real time, plus enough processing power for head tracking, etc. etc. Unless computers get several orders of magnitude better it seems unlikely that VR will take off any time soon.
Human eyes can only see 1 megapixel with any detail. Total bandwidth of optic nerve weighs in at a whopping 10mbit/s. That's 100 times wired Ethernet, at least 10 times typical 5ghz wireless and 1800 times HDMI 2.0.
The rest is waste. Obviously the necessary and only credible path forward is in improving display systems to be less wasteful.
This discussion isn't about Israel, Jews, or AIPAC. It's about Facebook removing 82 Iranian disinformation linked accounts.
For me it's about censorship and who gets hit by it and why. Individual players or countries of origin means nothing to me.
https://www.jpost.com/Israel-N...
In the past we've seen some influence efforts full of factually incorrect and misleading information (re JCPOA) on behalf of a foreign power (Israel) without so much as a suggestion of media pushback against it.
If you have to take it all the way down to your racist base you should find a forum more welcoming to that.
Just remember Netanyahu would have Trump's children if he could.
When they remove anything linked to an Israeli misinformation campaign.
Nobody in Washington fears "Russian trolls and bots".
Everyone fears AIPAC.
I'm pretty sure corece means " I'm a big powerful google executive, do what I say or you may lose your job / promotion opportunities. I don't really need to say this out loud, you know how it works".
Based on what?
He had a prior sexual relationship with her and according to Rubins ex-wife's divorce complaints Rubin spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on other women for sex during their marriage.
For all you know he simply offered her diamonds and gold.
Coerced sex is sexual assault... At least it is here, maybe in the US there is a different legal term for it.
Coercion by definition is NOT limited to threats of doom and violence. There are many ways to compel people to do what they otherwise wouldn't.
Surely you are not asserting for example buying someone something nice or expensive in exchange for sex is sexual assault in your country?
Why go that extra mile with reckless assumptions invoking "sexual assault" something nobody not even the authors of the articles or anyone else here has done when you have no supporting information to indicate it took place?
When people are reckless with assumptions and accusations and they are proven wrong it has negative impacts on others.
Cameras, assistants that googles shit for you.. all irrelevant noise to me.
Apple is an annoying company because they prioritize crap nobody cares about like artistic monoculture designs, how much shit weighs and being a bunch of pricks (e.g. "courage") over usability, locking people into walled gardens and charges ridiculous prices for mediocre hardware.
The most amusing part of all of this is MOST people walk around with their expensive pretty little works of art iPhones in cheap bulky rubberized cases. Every time I see one ... can't help but smile at the absurdity of the whole dynamic.
Expecting Apple users to grow a brain is like expecting Trump supporters to grow a brain. Neither are likely yet both are an entertaining freak show to behold.
Mmkay. So if a right-winger is involved, it's raah feminism, #WeBelieveSurvivors, Handmaid's Tale!
As soon as it's a left-winger, you start debating the meaning of "is"?
If we could harness hypocrisy for clean energy, we would solve global warming tomorrow.
These misunderstandings are common among individuals who elect to stop taking their meds without direction from medical professionals. Never even used a hash tag, spoken about "feminism" or believing. It's all in your head.
It's not like my question is secret information surely the people investigating this and perhaps the media reporting this story have contextual information that directly answers my question.
On the one hand they aren't SJW enough, they gave the guy $90M even though he sexually assaulted someone.
Sexual assault? Who said anything about assault? What evidence is this characterization based upon?
What am I supposed to believe "coerce" means in the context of this article?
Does coerce mean a promise to buy her a nice dinner later?
Does coerce mean threatening to chop her head off with a dull axe?
Interesting an article that goes on and on about golden parachutes, emails and extraneous drama involving unrelated people providing a history of who fucked who would pay lip service to the most critical aspect of the underlying story in a manner that offers no substantive information about the actual topic of the article to the reader.
The whole issue with Android is the network has no firewall, by default everything gets access to the Internet.
iptables works in Android the same as it does any Linux operating system.
iptables can be used to prevent network access from apps (user accounts) you don't want to access the network. Afwall for example is just a front end to iptables and is very much able to prevent access to the network to apps you don't want to have access.
In permissions it says you are giving the *app* permission, but the app isn't getting permission, the *company* making the app is. The first thing they do is to send all the data you just gave permission for to the parent company's servers.
User space created for the app to execute in is getting the permission.
And the built in apps get a free ride. On a lot of Android devices these days there is shitload of Google spyware, Microsoft spyware, Facebook spyware, and often some Chinese spyware, all pre-installed, all waiting for you to feed in your data to be sent off to parent HQ.
My own personal view it's insane to use an unmodified Android phone with Google play services installed. There are alternatives such as LineageOS which can be configured to at least prevent the OS from stalking you.
Remember 3D movies? Remember how Avatar was promoted relentlessly? 3D was a solution in search of a problem. While it allowed for a nifty new feature that could be sold for more money, it didn't solve a problem. It also had some nasty side effects that bother a lot of people. It didn't take long for 3D to be effectively abandoned. It simply isn't worth the cost to make something in 3D.
I often wonder if those carting out the 3DTV analogies have even once tried a modern 6DOF HMD for themselves.
I expected VR to be like looking thru binoculars or a viewmaster. Basically two big looking screens hanging in front of each eye going into it when I bought it sight unseen. Bzzt was I wrong. Totally completely and utterly not that way at all.
There is no Avator for people to relate to. Instead of buying one piece of technology you are buying one for each person. This makes 3D an expensive experience that can't be shared with anyone else. 3D is destined as a niche product that will never gain widespread consumer acceptance.
Split screen multiplayer and LAN play are an endangered species on consoles and PCs across the board and that royally sucks ass.
Play rec room in VR or meet up on some random planet hundreds of light years away with dozens of other CMDRs in Elite and then come back here and tell us all about how VR experiences can't be shared with anyone else.
Can someone use your technology without looking like an idiot?
No but mocking people wearing HMDs when they can't see you doing it is a lot of fun.
EVE is like CQC portion of Elite but worse and very few Elite players bother with CQC.
I gave my EVE license that came with Rift to someone else. Wasn't interested in trying after seeing videos of gameplay. That and would have had to un-firewall Oculus malware just to play. Not worth it.
Political correctness is a silencing tactic. By designating something political correctness you are saying that it's trivial and unimportant
It's actually more of an ignoring tactic. When you label something or someone PC you are not silencing them you are simply signaling to others what they have to say is not worth listening to or considering.
and therefore the person complaining is just whining.
Yep that's about right.
It really got going in the 80s when people were complaining about things like the building they studied in being named after the guy who owned their great great grandparents.
LOL cute.
I think most people don't understand that the actual database product is rock solid.
You're right we don't understand that because we know better.
"I want to avoid causing problems for this person, I'm sure it was an honest mistake, let's diffuse the situation."
There is no need to summarize (and mischaracterize) two whole sentences. You could have just quoted them without playing games.
The first sentence "I for one want to be on the side of defusing this, what about you?"
The second "The last thing I want is to be part of an angry mob running this guy out of his own project."
It appears to clearly imply failure to "defuse this" is connected to an "angry mob".
If you disagree what specifically do you think it says? What else would "angry mob" be referring to? What was the point of including that text if the author didn't believe an angry mob was present or possible?
"LOL SJW bigot mob attacking!!"
I don't know about "bigot" mob. I never said that.
My personal view is central failure of SJW ideology is rooted in a profound lack tolerance for beliefs and sensibilities of others.
You sound angry. Projecting much?
I am amused by absurdity.
Now, after looking at what the author has to say about it, I realize it's not a joke, or a mockery, it is in fact a religious screed put forth in all seriousness. And entirely out of place, if he needs to give a sermon then he should do it in church, or write a song or something.
Either he's mocking you or you are mocking his religious beliefs. Either way you lose.
Now I can see that the author, the original developer, is sincere enough. Just made a mistake. I for one want to be on the side of defusing this, what about you? The last thing I want is to be part of an angry mob running this guy out of his own project.
LOL classic SJW...
REPENT NOW or our mob will ATTTTAAACCKKK!!
SJW is the abusive narcissist's derogatory term for "person stands on the side of decency."
SJW is a mental disease.
It's a flippant attempt at a joke, intended to mock the concept of civil interpersonal relations, perhaps because somebody thinks that makes them look cool or smart or edgy or something, but instead sends the clear message "contribute your volunteer effort elsewhere." One word for this: backfire.
It's intended to mock people like yourself.
From anger generated by perpetually miserable SJW crowd I would say it's working as intended.
The only winning move is not to play