> . The statement changing the puppet doesn't change the puppeteer" implies without question that the president is a puppet.
That does assume, and there is a specific term for a assuming the answer to an important question. That term is "begging the question". It will be found on most lists of logical fallacies.
you are thinking of "raises the question". Raising the question ask for an answer. Begging the question assumes the answer. The word begging is used in the sense of "humor me for a moment and assume...". You're begging the audience to overlook your unwarranted and important assumption.
Um... no. The statement "changing the puppet doesn't change the puppeteer" implies without question that the president is a puppet. The question that is begging to be asked is the one the child post asked: Who is the puppeteer?
~$0.08 per device for one of the most significant and widely known technologies in use today, someone got a good deal, wasn't the Aussies
I don't know. Yes, WiFi is everywhere now, and it's easy to conclude that they should have charged more. but would WiFi have taken off in the same way if they had charged more? Perhaps not. Hindsight is easy. Foresight isn't.
Besides, I think I could retire quite comfortably on $430 million, even in Australia.
Since Islam also uses the Old Testament, it too could conclude a 6000 year old universe.
Not all churches take the old testament literally. There are plenty that take it figuratively and have no problem with modern cosmology, nor biology and evolution either.
Very good! So don't go painting all of Christianity with the brush of Young Earth Creationism. There's a few noisy cults/sects here and there, mostly in the US it seems, but not all Christians are Young Earthers.
I find it odd that that site is blocked. There is no "objectionable" material on it; ie nakedness, weapons, hatemongering, etc. Just a clipart style poster with icons you can hover over, and a link to buy the poster.
By extension, the records of a Private Investigator following someone are clearly a business record as well. So the cops can just hire PIs to follow suspects around, record their conversations, etc. without search warrants. Sigh! Why bother with a constitution at all?
Well, three to position the extruder within the gel, and three to orient it. The extruder is like a needle, and if you move it sideways, the gel will try to slosh around it to fill in the gap, so you want to be moving the extruder lengthwise as much as possible to minimize the effect.
However, I'm guessing that the real reason is that they happened to have a 6 axis manipulator lying around and using it would have been cheaper than building a specialized unit.
They are not extruding layer by layer, but they are moving an injector needle on a path through a block of gel. It allows the injector to follow a 3D path without having to wait for the model to be built up slice by slice.
Obviously there'll need to be some powerful advances in natural language processing. Once machines can determine the intent of words, then they will be able to appropriately block content.
Yes, they were below the glidepath, and yes they blew the approach and had to go around: but this is hardly seconds from disaster or even a close thing. 600' at a normal approach speed is not "close" to the ground and 3.8 NM is more than 3 minutes at Vref which is certainly adequate time to respond.
You're calculating time as horizontal distance to runway. That's irrelevant. The critical figure is the vertical distance to ground figure. They were below the glide path which means they were closer to the ground than they should have been. What's the descent rate? How much time did they really have?
Back in the before times, I was on a flight to England. I asked if I could visit the cockpit. While there (they have a fabulous view, by the way), they showed me the navigation console. It showed three positions: Inertial guidance, GPS, and VOR? If one was seriously out of whack with the others, it would have been readily apparent. Ships too have multiple nav systems.
Slashdot Mirror
> . The statement changing the puppet doesn't change the puppeteer" implies without question that the president is a puppet. That does assume, and there is a specific term for a assuming the answer to an important question. That term is "begging the question". It will be found on most lists of logical fallacies. you are thinking of "raises the question". Raising the question ask for an answer. Begging the question assumes the answer. The word begging is used in the sense of "humor me for a moment and assume ...". You're begging the audience to overlook your unwarranted and important assumption.
Where did I say "begging the question"?
Where did I say "begging the question"?
Um... no. The statement "changing the puppet doesn't change the puppeteer" implies without question that the president is a puppet. The question that is begging to be asked is the one the child post asked: Who is the puppeteer?
~$0.08 per device for one of the most significant and widely known technologies in use today, someone got a good deal, wasn't the Aussies
I don't know. Yes, WiFi is everywhere now, and it's easy to conclude that they should have charged more. but would WiFi have taken off in the same way if they had charged more? Perhaps not. Hindsight is easy. Foresight isn't.
Besides, I think I could retire quite comfortably on $430 million, even in Australia.
Since Islam also uses the Old Testament, it too could conclude a 6000 year old universe.
Not all churches take the old testament literally. There are plenty that take it figuratively and have no problem with modern cosmology, nor biology and evolution either.
Very good! So don't go painting all of Christianity with the brush of Young Earth Creationism. There's a few noisy cults/sects here and there, mostly in the US it seems, but not all Christians are Young Earthers.
Since Islam also uses the Old Testament, it too could conclude a 6000 year old universe.
Don't confuse Christianity and Catholicism.
I find it odd that that site is blocked. There is no "objectionable" material on it; ie nakedness, weapons, hatemongering, etc. Just a clipart style poster with icons you can hover over, and a link to buy the poster.
I'm sure some Russian corporation has Drivesky.
RIght, but if corporations are people, then their business records are clearly "personal effects and papers," no?
The amendment doesn't work if the "person" willingly hands their data over.
By extension, the records of a Private Investigator following someone are clearly a business record as well. So the cops can just hire PIs to follow suspects around, record their conversations, etc. without search warrants. Sigh! Why bother with a constitution at all?
"Directors have a legal obligation to maximize shareholder returns,
Where did you get that nonsense from?
Well, three to position the extruder within the gel, and three to orient it. The extruder is like a needle, and if you move it sideways, the gel will try to slosh around it to fill in the gap, so you want to be moving the extruder lengthwise as much as possible to minimize the effect.
However, I'm guessing that the real reason is that they happened to have a 6 axis manipulator lying around and using it would have been cheaper than building a specialized unit.
They are not extruding layer by layer, but they are moving an injector needle on a path through a block of gel. It allows the injector to follow a 3D path without having to wait for the model to be built up slice by slice.
Ahem!
Tooked out? Is that some sort of hobbit speak for making something more adventurous?
They're identical concepts, except tag is easier to spell and say. Oh, and sometimes tags have a hash (#) in them.
Obviously there'll need to be some powerful advances in natural language processing. Once machines can determine the intent of words, then they will be able to appropriately block content.
And the past.
Ever since the Neolithic Revolution screwed things up.
Yes, new rock is revolting.
Not use foul language? On the Internet? How will I Tweet?
Switch to fowl language?
Yes, they were below the glidepath, and yes they blew the approach and had to go around: but this is hardly seconds from disaster or even a close thing. 600' at a normal approach speed is not "close" to the ground and 3.8 NM is more than 3 minutes at Vref which is certainly adequate time to respond.
You're calculating time as horizontal distance to runway. That's irrelevant. The critical figure is the vertical distance to ground figure. They were below the glide path which means they were closer to the ground than they should have been. What's the descent rate? How much time did they really have?
... if you are working off of a map, you basically can just read the NM with your protractor.
Good luck with that. The only way you can read NM with a protractor is if you're looking at a cross section of the globe.
Governments are not going to allow an alternate form of currency to gain traction that they have no control over.
Ah! That would explain why US currency isn't accepted anywhere else on the planet.
Back in the before times, I was on a flight to England. I asked if I could visit the cockpit. While there (they have a fabulous view, by the way), they showed me the navigation console. It showed three positions: Inertial guidance, GPS, and VOR? If one was seriously out of whack with the others, it would have been readily apparent. Ships too have multiple nav systems.
What? Governments are democratically elected on Earth?
Of course not. That's why they're revolting.