Slashdot Mirror


Russia Proposes Banning Foul Language On the Internet

eldavojohn writes "In a country where it's illegal to insult a government official, State Duma Deputy Yelena Mizulina has proposed an amendment to ban swearing on social networks, bulletin boards and all websites. The website would be blocked if the offending material had not been removed within 24 hours. The name of the law this would be added to? "On the protection of children from information harmful to their health and development." Mizulina's title in regards to this legislation? Chairwoman of the Committee on Family, Women and Children (No joke!). Of course, Yelena Mizulina is no stranger to unwarranted censorship as she was behind the law banning gay propaganda to minors and invoked laws to try to silence critics on twitter. The article also notes, 'United Russia deputy Vitaly Milonov put forward a similar initiative on 25 July. He proposed to tighten control over social networks and allow people to dating sites through their passports.'"

239 comments

  1. Obligartory by ifranto · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, foul language bans you!

    1. Re:Obligartory by rullywowr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Profanity, motherfucker! Do. You. Speak. It?

    2. Re:Obligartory by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, o just bend over and take it, you are in Russia sucker.

    3. Re:Obligartory by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      In post-Soviet Russia, government offends you!

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    4. Re:Obligartory by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Profanity, motherfucker! Do. You. Speak. It?

      Fuck yeah.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    5. Re:Obligartory by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Not use foul language? On the Internet? How will I Tweet?

    6. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, ban foul languages you!

    7. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duma must be shorthand for 'dumbass'.

    8. Re: Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is free speach in Russia today. You can stand in the middle of Red Square (or Moscow Airport), shouting "President Obama is a criminal" and you wont be arrested.

    9. Re:Obligartory by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not use foul language? On the Internet? How will I Tweet?

      Switch to fowl language?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Obligartory by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

      It's so. March 7, 2013 Gosduma (State Duma) has been named Gosdura (State Dumbass) by TVman Pozner in liveTV transmission. And this name came to our lexicon.

    11. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      must crush capitalism!
      http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyfjp3_simpsons-return-of-the-soviet-union_fun

    12. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this takes off, and the other countries adopt it, Slashdot won't get any posts.

    13. Re:Obligartory by Motard · · Score: 1

      America, FUCK YEAH!
      Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah,
      America, FUCK YEAH!
      Freedom is the only way yeah,
      Terrorist your game is through cause now you have to answer too,
      America, FUCK YEAH!
      So lick my butt, and suck on my balls,
      America, FUCK YEAH!
      What you going to do when we come for you now,
      it’s the dream that we all share; it’s the hope for tomorrow

      FUCK YEAH!

    14. Re:Obligartory by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Regardless of whether you're right or wrong it's so far off topic. We're talking about foul language here, a fun subject and you gotta drag fucking politics into it. Fuck you, dickhead!

    15. Re:Obligartory by thewils · · Score: 1

      Fcuk you mothertrucker!

      Now...was I profane or not?

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    16. Re:Obligartory by houghi · · Score: 1

      If these words are allowed, how will this posting be moderated; you kike faggot nigger.

      Seriously, think about how you perhaps would ban one word and not another.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re: Obligartory by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How about if you shouted "President/Prime Minister (what is he today?) Putin is a criminal?" Chances are that you'd get a radioisotope in your drink

    18. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jay and Silent Bob don't seem to give a rat's ass.

    19. Re: Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice, but the story is about Russia, not America. Why do you hate America, fucker?

    20. Re:Obligartory by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      The law is a load of COCK!

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    21. Re:Obligartory by Kjellander · · Score: 1

      Profanity, motherfucker! Do. You. Speak. It?

      Pizdets!

      Too bad slashcode can't do UTF-8....

    22. Re:Obligartory by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Fowl language is still ok, motherchicken!

    23. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bird bird bird, bird is the word!

    24. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flower you!
      Was i profane or not? The answer is yes i was as that was my intention.

    25. Re:Obligartory by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry; your cell phone's spell checker can generate the obscenities for you.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    26. Re: Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your irony settings...

    27. Re:Obligartory by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I just came here to say, fuck that.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    28. Re:Obligartory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite soviet since 1991.. anyway, Russia is looking better for family values and freedoms than the usa or uk at this point. Now that is very, very worrying.

    29. Re:Obligartory by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      Not use foul language? On the Internet? How will I Tweet?

      Switch to fowl language?

      I'm too chicken-shit to do that...

  2. Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k. Idiots. Is this enough to be arrested there? Just wondering... ..|..

    1. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Be careful before joking on the Internet. In the US that is enough to send you to jail.

    2. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't live on the Land of "Freedom", I can curse as much I f*cking want here :)

    3. Re:Dear Russia, by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k

      I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.

    4. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful before joking on the Internet. In the US that is enough to send you to jail.

      And you ass clowns want to take control of TLD's away from ICANN and give it to the UN, who would place it under control of the Security Council.
      Which is the US, France, China, Russia, and the UK. How THAT is supposed to avoid rampant censorship of the internet is beyond me.

    5. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's just because his password contains u, c, and i.

    6. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Better with the UN than with the U$A...

    7. Re:Dear Russia, by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Go F**k Yourself."

      You mean " "?

    8. Re:Dear Russia, by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Better with the UN than with the U$A...

      That's like saying it's better to leave your kids in the care of Albert Fish than John Gacy.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Dear Russia, by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k

      I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.

      [Insert Slashdot/UTF-8 support joke here]

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:Dear Russia, by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anonymous Cowards proclaiming their freedom to swear and not even daring to spell out "fuck" properly. Cunts.

    11. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k

      I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.

      [Insert Slashdot/UTF-8 support joke here]

      On Slashdot, Russian profanity looks like this ..

      I guess it's already banned, or at least an illegal character set.

    12. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, you fill in the blanks and it says something about your personality. I code a lot so what popped in my head was
      "Go fork yourself. And, after that, go seek your own disks."

      I suppose that someone who does food processing might see "go soak your own ducks" and so on.

    13. Re:Dear Russia, by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Nope, unless you want freedom loving organizations like the islamic controlled 'human rights commission' to have say in running things.. While rampant socialist (and, yes, that includes the corporate sponsored variety) censorship and 'political correctness' are squeezing through the cracks and politician-punched holes in the US constitution, the other major powers represented by the UN are decidedly NOT in favor of things like free speech or calling out the emperor's stupidity for what it is. America is getting pretty bad, I agree, but this problem is way worse elsewhere.

    14. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Cowards proclaiming their freedom to swear and not even daring to spell out "fuck" properly. Cunts.

      But that's how they spell it in their country. D*mned arrogant *mericans! Don't even have the letter "*" in their alphabet!

    15. Re:Dear Russia, by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. People who believe the UN is some kind of benevolent force are completely deluded.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    16. Re:Dear Russia, by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      And you ass clowns want to take control of TLD's away from ICANN

      I personally don't care. There are 2 kinds of Internet activity. First one uses some domain names given by authorities according to specific rules and revoked or banned by censors. The second one uses cryptographic hashes as addresses and cannot be banned.

      And the faster the censors kill the DNS the sooner the uncensorable Internet will appear.

    17. Re:Dear Russia, by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k

      I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.

      That's not garbage in the keyboard, it's backed up garbage between the ears. It probably has a tendency to leak out of the mouth too.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    18. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better with the UN than with the U$A...

      That's like saying it's better to leave your kids in the care of Albert Fish than John Gacy.

      Well, Michael Jackson is dead now.

    19. Re:Dear Russia, by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Anonymous Cowards proclaiming their freedom to swear and not even daring to spell out "fuck" properly. Cunts.

      But that's how they spell it in their country. D*mned arrogant *mericans! Don't even have the letter "*" in their alphabet!

      At least he didn't spell out l*wy*r.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    20. Re:Dear Russia, by just_a_monkey · · Score: 1

      Dronestrike in 3, 2, 1...

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    21. Re:Dear Russia, by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      I think the hope is that the UN will be so split about any minor issue concerning the internet, that they will at worst endlessly debate and vote on censorship, but nothing will ever get done. So basicly the internet will forever be left to it's own devices.
      This hope is not unfounded, given the previous record of the UN not getting stuff done.

    22. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go Fuck Yourself. And, after that, Go suck your own dick. Idiots. Is this enough to be arrested there? Just wondering... ..|..

      TFTFY

    23. Re:Dear Russia, by mlts · · Score: 2

      We nearly had it far worse than this. In 1996, a law was passed called the Communications Decent Act. Initial drafts made any ISP where a packet of someone writing "fuck" criminally liable for the traffic (it made all ISPs considered as content makers, thus they "owned" any traffic coming from their peerings). The final draft made it a Federal crime of 2-10 years to use profanity.

      The law never saw a day of enforcement. It was soon struck down by a lower court, then killed forever by a 7-2 verdict by SCOTUS.

      So, it did happen here in a worse way than any of this ever even dreamed.

    24. Re:Dear Russia, by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.

      No, those are the places where his password hiding browser extension works. The "f", "s", "k", and "d" keys are broken and are leaking his password information.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    25. Re:Dear Russia, by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      [Insert Slashdot/UTF-8 support joke here]

      ç"YããZãç"Yã"ããç"YãYã¾ã"

    26. Re:Dear Russia, by pakar · · Score: 1

      Well... They can probably never agree on anything so no new regulations will be introduced :)

    27. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right.

      Tell this to the Bush administration and the Iraqi people. The UN is nothing more than useless BS. Every nation can fuck up as much as they want, as long as they don't fuck with jews.

    28. Re:Dear Russia, by kheldan · · Score: 2

      Hasn't this been tried about a million times before, with the same result every single time? That's where 7334 came from, after all, to get around word filters. Are they going to ban euphemisms, abbreviations, innuendo, and implications as well? Didn't work before, won't work this time. They may as well just ban the internet entirely.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    29. Re:Dear Russia, by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      No I don't think so, If there's one thing that all the members of the UN Security Council can agree on it's that its imperative to have total control over the message. Whatever message that might be. Anyone who doesn't love and respect their great leaders are terrorist and their message can't be allowed to be heard or else others might become infected with ideas. Idea's that are not approved by our great leaders are dangerous and can spell disaster the likes that have never been seen on earth. We have to think of the children, protect them from hearing anything that could hurt them and make them not love there respective country. All messages must be controlled or horrible things will happen. Freedom of thought can't be allowed to spread...

      I honestly don't want any nation or group of nations to control the Internet. I want basement dwelling nerds to maintain the Internet. I don't want them making any rules, I just want them to maintain and improve the speed and function of greatest creation ever to slip past governmental oversight...

      I don't know how this can be done but I pray for all of us. My god protect the Internet for it is GOOD in all of its troll infested, donkey porn, spam filled, flame war greatness... Ah-men...

    30. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second one uses cryptographic hashes as addresses

      Need car parts delivered to your door? Visit AFL9s2M9x0557PfPea21mmb9fas3rIEXzL today!

    31. Re:Dear Russia, by wmac1 · · Score: 1

      Just wait a bit and US government may implement the same laws and then "Dear You" will need to F**k yourself (your sentence, not mine).

      Remember discussions about China's internet censorship here on /.. Those same things are now in place in the UK (and may come to US soon).

    32. Re:Dear Russia, by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Does it work better as: "Go *uc* yourself. And, after that, Go *uc* your own *ic*"?

    33. Re:Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k

      I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.

      Go sick on your duck?

    34. Re:Dear Russia, by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k. Idiots. Is this enough to be arrested there? Just wondering...

      Yes, it is. Not under the proposed profanity laws (which are, well, proposed). But under the recently approved law that prohibits propaganda of "deviant sexual behavior" to minors. I believe that sucking one's own dick qualifies (heck, Mizulina said that oral sex in general would qualify!), and I'm sure there are minors reading Slashdot.

      Note though that all this silliness doesn't have to do much with Russians, but rather with the government. There has been an ultraconservative revival of sorts among politicians lately, and they've been busy sucking it up to the Church and looking for witches to burn.

  3. The Future by hey · · Score: 1

    I can see the future of the internet. There will always be somebody in authority wanting to ban something.

    1. Re:The Future by nine-times · · Score: 1

      ... and claiming that they want to ban it in order to protect children. Because then it puts any opponents to the ban in the position of seeming to say, "I don't want to protect children."

      And I think what you'll find is that, in each case, the proposed ban is just a way to get a foot in the door, so that they can build more invasive systems for monitoring and filtering what we access in general.

    2. Re:The Future by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Because then it puts any opponents to the ban in the position of seeming to say, "I don't want to protect children."

      Well, I'd just answer, "Why don't you protect your own children, instead of outsourcing your parental responsibilities to the rest of society?"

      "Charity begins in the home."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:The Future by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2

      I can see the future of the internet. There will always be somebody in authority wanting to ban something.

      It will also be nothing but teletubbies. Plus, you get an award for logging in.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:The Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I saw an article in the local paper about how parents want to install a monitor with the local ISP to track and filter their children's internet activities.

      WHERE IN THE FUCK ARE THE PARENTS???

      You don't want little Johnny on the internet at 3 am? Monitor your fucking children, and stop pushing your failures onto the rest of us. What it almost always boils down to in that situation is that parents don't want to be the bad guy, they want to be their kids' friends.

    5. Re:The Future by Dins · · Score: 1

      I am my 15 year old son's friend. We share common interests (computers, video games, technology, etc.) and so we get along great. But his computer is in the basement right next to mine and it's going to be that way until he moves out. It has worked well, and while I did have parental control software on it when he was younger, I removed all of it and gave him admin access a couple years ago. Raise them right, give them some freedom, but supervise, and it all works out. Can he access porn when I'm not around? Sure. But at 15 1/2 I'm not too worried about it.

    6. Re:The Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic that underage/young adults are the ones that are more likely to use foul languages.
      Some of us in the older generations can do a lot more personal insults without resorting to foul languages.

    7. Re:The Future by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Great, now you just got /. banned in Russia!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    8. Re:The Future by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's the same old thing they do with the pro-choice/pro-life abortion campaigns. If you're not for pro-choice, you are against people having a choice, which is bad. If you are against the pro-life side, you are against life, which can be seen as equally bad. the pro-choice people would have a lot more trouble getting support if they called it pro-fetus-killling.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:The Future by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      I am my 15 year old son's friend. We share common interests (computers, video games, technology, etc.) and so we get along great. But his computer is in the basement right next to mine and it's going to be that way until he moves out. It has worked well, and while I did have parental control software on it when he was younger, I removed all of it and gave him admin access a couple years ago. Raise them right, give them some freedom, but supervise, and it all works out. Can he access porn when I'm not around? Sure. But at 15 1/2 I'm not too worried about it.

      At 15 1/2, I'd be worried if he didn't try to access porn...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    10. Re:The Future by just_a_monkey · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd just answer, "Why don't you protect your own children, instead of outsourcing your parental responsibilities to the rest of society?"

      "So you don't want to protect the children?! You monster!"

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    11. Re:The Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell any social workers.

      I had a friend nearly lose her 14 1/2 yo son because a social worker walked in on him (without knocking). There is a whole series of reports about how "degenerate" and "inappropriate" it is for a teenager to look at porn.

      The professional child protection establishment and "reality" are pretty far apart.

    12. Re:The Future by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I think you are correct and I am all for freedom of speech. As for foul language I rarely use it and those that know me well know that when I do I mean serious business. That however is a personal choice.

    13. Re:The Future by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There were actually calls to ban teletubbies in Russia. For the sake of the children. Because they're brainwashing our kids into mindless western consumerism.

  4. Ban? by rullywowr · · Score: 1

    Ban foul language? Fuck that shit!

    1. Re:Ban? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Does Russian qualify as a foul language?

  5. My response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off, Russia.

  6. In the immortal words of Frost... by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    "Well what the hell are we supposed to use? Harsh language?" ...aww crap....dang....errrm....!@#$%^&*(

    1. Re:In the immortal words of Frost... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Nope, simply swap to words with dual meanings which would be very difficult to ban ie fuck vs screw, dick vs cock, pussy vs cunt. Given enough time should they be serious enough, the use any words could be banned.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  7. Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good fucking luck.

  8. Fuck you, Russia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing more need be said.

  9. I always thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought French was a foul language... Is Russia planning to ban French?

    NOTE: to those who miss the subtlety... I'm trying to point out the absurdity of trying to ban anything from the internet... Especially, if it is being banned for reasons of being offensive...

    1. Re:I always thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French tried to ban foul language on the Internet, but then they gave up right away.

    2. Re:I always thought... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I always thought French was a foul language... Is Russia planning to ban French?

      French isn't a foul language, it's just that speaking it makes my nose bleed. ;)

    3. Re:I always thought... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Pardon my French...

    4. Re:I always thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cussing in French is like wiping your ass with silk." (The Merovingian)

    5. Re:I always thought... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Or Russian

  10. Future? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is that not the present?

    1. Re:Future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Internet: Bringing you tomorrow's future today!

    2. Re:Future? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      And the past. The only question is how successful these people are.

      As you probably saw recently the UK will be getting a their own Great Wall type censorship soon...which you can opt out of. Great way to get the "troublemakers" to identify themselves, I bet the Chinese wish they'd thought of that first.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Future? by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Hugely successful.
      After all, who doesn't love the rulers? they are so awesome, always care for our well being. Take Putin, he's is sooo gentle with his adversaries, to the point of giving up his positions. He's also a nice man. Not as sexy as His Honesty Berlusconi, who has to run away from hordes of horny chicks, but almost there.

      I wonder if this law will make any difference, since all we want to do is to praise the leaders who constantly succeed in making this planet the best possible place in the entire universe.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    4. Re:Future? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      And the past.

      Ever since the Neolithic Revolution screwed things up.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:Future? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      And the past.

      Ever since the Neolithic Revolution screwed things up.

      Yes, new rock is revolting.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  11. It Can't Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Various things stated in one language may mean something different in a different language. For example, I once read that the phrase "black hole" --a well-accepted thing in Science-- qualifies as "foul language" in Russia.

    1. Re:It Can't Work by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      I once listened to a series of lectures about string theory, and one of the Japanese lecturers kept referring to "brack hos".

    2. Re:It Can't Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was he referring to Obama's mistresses?

    3. Re:It Can't Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ho lee fuk ree ree?

  12. Good Job Russia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good! I'm fucking sick and goddamn tired of all of these sons of bitches who have to use that profane language shit on the fucking internet. I'm fucking glad that those Russian bastards are going to do something about those cock sucking motherfuckers!

  13. That's the BBC too then by Skiron · · Score: 1

    Fuck Why the capital 'F' I do not know.

    1. Re:That's the BBC too then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a quote, and on BBC News quotes are actual quotes.

    2. Re:That's the BBC too then by nickol · · Score: 1

      BBC - no. Just because the English word "fuck" has no meaning in Russian.
      But - this site is already banned in Russia

      http://ironscheme.net/

      Enjoy.

    3. Re:That's the BBC too then by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What do you mean it has no meaning there? Can we just send them some explanatory videos or something?

  14. Fine with me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only good things coming from Russia are dash-cam videos.

    1. Re:Fine with me by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Fucking tanks.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  15. In defense of the cursers by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

    They DO live in Russia, after all. Come to think of it, that probably explains the drinking too.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  16. yes of course... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

    its for the CHILDREN FOR GODS sakes!!!

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:yes of course... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      the CHILDREN FOR GODS sakes

      Wait, are we doing human sacrifices again?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:yes of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, we are renting their souls for a limited time for a price. Works much better in the long run.

  17. The more things change... by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

    When are people going to learn, democracy doesn't work. -HJS

  18. Well, nice knowing them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And suddenly the number of Russian speakers in Google Analytics drop to zero, as every American social media site is blocked. The Russians better figure out another way of posting to YouTube, as some of there stuff is hilarious.

    1. Re:Well, nice knowing them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be a shame not to have Youtube posts from Russia. The videos of last winter's Siberian meteor were particularly informative. I never knew that "yebat" was Russian for "meteor".

  19. Start with Dota in game voice chat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put some voice recognition on there scanning for russian cursing.

    It would have the same fate as Professor Frink's sarcasm detector.

  20. Wow by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Are they planning to make the Internet the only place in Russia that's free of cursing? Cursing is more endemic to Russia than drinking.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  21. This will work! by dingonix · · Score: 1

    This will definitely work. They won't even need to resort to a filter. I'm sure that all of the teenagers, who are just learning to swear, will see the newly published rules and follow the rules. The culture of the internet will accept such a proposal, much in the same way that we have chosen to always post well reasoned, researched contributions.

  22. No Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a parallel analisys fo the topic:

    What is wrong with "Committee on Family, Women and Children"?. I am a man and I did not understand what is wrong.
    Children, women and family (and men too and elders) are what is important in the world. A Committe of humankind.

    Looks like a committee of Money, Weathy Slavery and Exploration would be a more serious committee for the author.

    I think it is time that we need a more human approach in the politics.

    1. Re:No Joke? by Svenia · · Score: 1

      I've never understood how things like this weren't sexist as well. Are the elderly not family? Are husbands not family? At my school we had (past tense) an organization called "the women's center" that would help women find financial aid and loan out books free of charge. I'm not opposed to feminism or women's rights, but isn't that just as sexist? Like black history month and affirmative action are racist?

      Maybe I'm just ignorant, I'm sure if that's the case someone here will be more than happy to inform me.

    2. Re:No Joke? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with "Committee on Family, Women and Children"?

      That this Committee is a mask of "United Russia", universally named here "Party of Crooks and Thieves" (See Wikipedia article "United Russia" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Russia

    3. Re:No Joke? by sageres · · Score: 1

      "Committee on Family, Women and Children" was a standard Soviet pressure-tool for dissimination of propaganda and criticism of NATO nations at any convenience. See also "Committee of Peace".

    4. Re:No Joke? by pla · · Score: 1

      I'm not opposed to feminism or women's rights, but isn't that just as sexist? Like black history month and affirmative action are racist?

      Any serious answer to that will involve the word "privilege". The person writing it will use that word in a way that doesn't match any definition you have ever heard used before. As they explain their use, your blood pressure will steadily increase until your eyes start bulging and you start screaming at the monitor at the almost inconceivable suppression of rational thought it must take someone to memorize such a large volume of internally inconsistent drivel.

    5. Re:No Joke? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Even suggesting these hypocrisies might exist will get you labeled a 'hater'. Welcome to the newspeak/doublethink world of political correctness. You are, in fact, correct: People who are not on the current in-play protected list (whether it's race, gender or something else), have no rights. They are expected to shut up and pick up the slack when 'equality' becomes inconvenient for those on the list.

    6. Re:No Joke? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with "Committee on Family, Women and Children"?. I am a man and I did not understand what is wrong.

      As usual, the more explicitly benign the name sounds, the more likely it is to be something oppressive. You know, kinda like Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

      In this particular case, the more appropriate name of the committee would be "Committee on Censorship".

  23. I Swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia is the only country who gets things right anymore.

  24. HaveSexWith that HumanWaste! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or DoublePlusUngood, as George Orwell's characters would say.

  25. WTF? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    OK, how do you say WTF in Russian?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:WTF? by estestvoispytatel · · Score: 1

      There's no direct foul equivalent, but 'What the hell?' is 'Shtoh za cheeyort?' — it's quite mild btw.

    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chto za khooynya?" is obscene and means about the same.

  26. Dear Putin, by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

    мÑfÐÐÌÐ!

    Ð--ÐÑÐнÐÑÑOE, ÐÐРнРÑ...ÑfÐ!

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:Dear Putin, by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      how cute, slashdot doesn't support UTF-8 in 2013. :(

      either that OR PUTIN HAS GOTTEN TO THEM

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Dear Putin, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA proxy doesn't support Russian yet. They are working to fix this and plan to add a regression test.

    3. Re:Dear Putin, by sageres · · Score: 1

      I even tried KOI-8R -- it does not work.

      I think it is because you can get so many "interesting" symbols from a standard unicode table to represent almost anything, but than again -- Slashdot was never censored.

    4. Re:Dear Putin, by sageres · · Score: 1

      LMAO I would think RUSSIAN would be the very first language the proxy would support... if not written in.

    5. Re:Dear Putin, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how cute, slashdot doesn't support UTF-8 in 2013. :(

      either that OR PUTIN HAS GOTTEN TO THEM

      "Never attribute to malice, that which can be reasonably explained by stupidity."

    6. Re:Dear Putin, by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      how cute, slashdot doesn't support UTF-8 in 2013. :(

      And has steadfastly failed to do so for years -- not exactly news.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  27. We russians don't curse - by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 3, Informative

    - we just use bad words as ordinary speech (My russkie matom ne rugaemsya - my matom razgovarivaem).

    And all this curse-banning circus has the only purpose that isn't exposed: To promote Internet filters that will be (and are) used for any purpose THEY like. No wonder that I2P NetDB contains more Russian nodes than any other country's.

    1. Re:We russians don't curse - by sageres · · Score: 1

      I agree. To prohibit such speech, they have to implement Censorship. it is an excuse to take away even more liberty.
      (Po russki is more eloquant (sorry Slashdot won't allow cyrillics) -- Etot nakaz ne ot blyat' s Dubi a ot sutenyerov s Kremlya.

    2. Re:We russians don't curse - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, only few actually speak profanity, most simply cuss.
      Times have changed since most of the intelligentsia moved out of Russia. Most people don't even get the plural of doctor right... Or where they're from... What a shame!

    3. Re:We russians don't curse - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm certain that the precious children are never exposed to such language on the playground, or from the media they already are exposed to.

    4. Re:We russians don't curse - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to be a new political party in Russia, named as The Russian Language Defense League to fight off these attacks to the diversity and expressibility of the Russian language. Wait, that name maybe wasn't such a good idea..

  28. Dear Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ебать тебя, ёбаная Россея.

  29. Well by no-body · · Score: 1

    People/humans interpreting sound as "foul" are foul in their brain structure and need to clean up their neural wiring. Similar all that religious junk going around and what else have you.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People interpreting ink stains on a dried out mess of wood pulp as "First Amendment rights" are equally insane, I suppose ...

  30. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon to the UK.

  31. while this particular instance is funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the trend is not

    everywhere you see "authority figures" attempting to censor, control, spy on, ban, and criminalize the modern means of free, anonymous communication

    The reason is that anonymity is the only real defense the powerless have against the powerful.

    What "we the people" or "the 99%" or however you want to call those who aren't oligarchs or wannabe oligarchs need is a decentralized communications medium outside the control of any corporation or government.

    Once the technology is accessible to the non-geeks the oligarchs will have the choice, give up any pretense of legitimacy and go full North Korea or live with the fact that an accessible means of communication is outside of their control.

    freenet and tor are starts but they are tied to the existing oligarchy controlled infrastructure, we need peer-to-peer mesh networks that are so ubiquitous that there isn't any way to realistically shut them down

  32. And this is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly why the U.S will never hand over control of the Internet to anyone else.

  33. They can spoony right off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish people would understand that if you ban one curse word, people will just use another.

  34. Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If it's just the foul words, then work around them.

      * Consume feces and expire!
      * Perform coitus upon yourself!
      * You present-day Oedipus!

    1. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot

      *ammo box revolt

      That's what it's going to take to get liberty back on top of the pile again.

    2. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's just the foul words, then work around them.

        * Consume feces and expire!

        * Perform coitus upon yourself!

        * You present-day Oedipus!

      There is a certain elegance to literate epithets that the more mundane forms lack.

    3. Re:Alternatives? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      What is the problem with foul words? Meanings. In different cultures with the same language what is an foul word is something not offensive and used in normal speak in others. Is the full meaning in the head of the ones that say and hear it, not the word, what makes it foul, something totally subjective and that don't need to be shared between both participants. And you can transmit pretty offensive meanings with just the language used by 4 year old children (most of the key elements are present, body parts, parents, basic actions, common animals and plants, etc) And that meanings evolve with time, something could be a foul word or expression now that wasn't 20 years ago (when internet started to become popular). Would you ban content because something innocent said there is considered offensive now? Or today, but for saying something that won't be offensive in a few years?

    4. Re:Alternatives? by isorox · · Score: 1

      You forgot

      *ammo box revolt

      That's what it's going to take to get liberty back on top of the pile again.

      No, you and your gun nut whackos will be taken out and the 99% that don't give a flying fsck will carry on as normal.

      To use the ammo box successfully, you need a good portion of the country behind you. Get the administration to cancel American Idle and you'll have a chance

  35. You don't say! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > In a country where it's illegal to insult a government official,
    > scum-sucking, pimple-biting, turd-chugging, goat-humping, measel-loaded festering fistula of a human State Duma
    > Deputy Yelena Mizulina has proposed an amendment to ban swearing on social networks, bulletin boards and all websites.

    FTFY

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  36. In the immortal words of George Carlin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits...

    And Tits doesn't even belong on the list, you know.

  37. State duma != Russia by MrL0G1C · · Score: 4, Insightful

    News sites should quit doing this, Russia is a land mass and can not ban anything, the asshats in the State Duma otoh might come up with crap like this.

    'USA thinks it should invade North Korea'

    See how that works, propagandist news style that is 99% lie.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    1. Re:State duma != Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure--Russia as a whole isn't proposing putting this ban up, but the Russian government is, and the Russian government ostensibly represents the Russian people. We say, "Russia proposes banning foul language on the internet" for the same reason we say, "America votes to extend Patriot Act." Even if most Russians wouldn't seriously consider this proposal, that doesn't change the fact that Russian leadership--which exerts a lot of influence both at home and abroad through the Russian power structure, which by and large the people there support--is considering this proposal.

    2. Re:State duma != Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHH! Don't give us ideas!

  38. Russia would shut down by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    How would Russians communicate without cursing?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Russia would shut down by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      Something like a drunk Swedish chef. "Vodka vodka, vodka vodka borscht."

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    2. Re:Russia would shut down by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Proper borscht is made with vodka. Also you add vodka to it and then use vodka for desert.

    3. Re:Russia would shut down by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      They'll have to switch to low-alcohol Vodka mixed with decaffeinated diet red-bull.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    4. Re:Russia would shut down by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They may as well finish off the bottle. Vodka goes bad once it's opened.

    5. Re:Russia would shut down by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely no way any building construction project can be finished after this.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    6. Re:Russia would shut down by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      By acting the insults out instead.

      But then, that would run afoul of the recently signed law that bans propaganda of deviant sexual behavior. Fuck. I mean, er...

  39. Lame Excuse to censor by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    "The website would be blocked if the offending material had not been removed within 24 hours. "

    Snowden better get his shit straight soon. He's not going to be able to reach anything but fuzzy kitten websites within a couple weeks and even then... one bad translation of "Pussy" and there goes lolcats.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  40. Illegal to insult a government official? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Lame attempt to spice up the intro.
    It's the same in many countries, including many democracies such as France, India...

    Regardless of your constitutional rights, I suggest it's also a very bad idea in the US of A.

    That said, I have travelled and worked a lot in the USA and Russia, plus other more 'exotic' spots such as the Middle East, (including Israel), North Africa, Central and South America....
    Never had any problem with the police or other officials, at all...
    (Indeed, one time in the USA, the officer who stopped me for doing an illegal u turn coming out of a "gentleman's bar" was kind enough to escort me to the hotel, since I did not know the way and my colleagues were totally hammered...)

    Be polite. It works.

    1. Re:Illegal to insult a government official? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Regardless of your constitutional rights, I suggest it's also a very bad idea in the US of A.

      Written by someone who has never been to a town-hall meeting in the USA.

      Or witnessed the screaming invective thrown at both Bush and Obama.

      No, in the USA you don't get in trouble for insulting a government official - shooting him might get you jail time, insulting him...nah.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Illegal to insult a government official? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah isn't it amazing how resembling a foreign, professional, white guy in a suit makes local officials more polite? It's almost as if they don't apply the same rules to a presumably-vanilla person who will soon be out of the country and who probably is bringing in hard currency, as they do to their own citizens! Wow!

    3. Re:Illegal to insult a government official? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      I've often thought it would be fun to have a contest based on insulting the US President. To make it interesting, it would only be open to people visiting the US.

      Contestants would stand outside the White House fence and publicly insult the president, loudly and with a sign, while videoing it. All videos would be posted to YouTube. Winner would be the one with the most views. Threats of violence would be disqualified.

      The contest would serve two purposes: a bit of fun and showing the world that, despite other flaws, you really can say just about anything with impunity.

      Side contests doing the same at other government branches would also be fun.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  41. How? by lvxferre · · Score: 2

    So, let's pretend for a moment that banning foul language isn't completely ridiculous, but a worthy goal from Russian government. There's still a practical problem... how?

    First of all, the censorsh... (oops, "child protection") department will need to monitor consistently all sites in the Russosphere, and maybe some in the Anglosphere. Some of those won't reside in Russian Federation, and RF's gov asking the responsible countries' govs for info about the criminal swearing scum will at least result in a "lolshto" (lol, what?) from the other govs.

    Second, does Mizulina really think this is feasible? How? Censors? Well, good luck, they would need all Russian tech-savvy population for that... (exactly the ones they want to control).

    Filters? Hell, it's hard to make those for Latin-based languages, but almost impossible for Cyrillic-based ones! Let's say you ban a swear word in Russian (I would use examples, but /. filters all Cyrillic letters). They would need to filter the word itself, anny misspell (intentional or not), different transliterations to Latin, Volapük encoding (a leetspeak-like transliteration using Latin letters that resemble Cyrillic ones), plus, any tactics the internet use regardless of language to avoid filters (like writing pr0n, FML, phuck...).

    To show the infeasibility of that, I used a three-letters swearing, khuj ("dick") as example. Just on top of my mind, I got twelve variations - you can bet any Russian native can bring a dozen more. (Here: http://pastebin.com/bcH2bg2S ).

    Third and last: if they do manage to make a comprehensible list of swear words with all the variations, just imagine the amount of false positives on an international scale - like Russian gov annoying Brazilian one because someone wrote "curva" in a fucking blog! (just "curve" in Portuguese, but an acceptable transliteration for kurva ["whore"] in Russian).

    Frankly... I'm not worried with this censorship being implemented at all, but rather, the intentions behind it.

    --
    Nerdy news for your nerdy needs? http://www.soylentnews.org Soylent News is people!
    1. Re:How? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Obviously there'll need to be some powerful advances in natural language processing. Once machines can determine the intent of words, then they will be able to appropriately block content.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:How? by lvxferre · · Score: 1

      One would need a goddamn GOOD AI to catch filter-avoiding content... I don't think we'll see language processing reaching this point in our lifetimes, even theoretically. [I may be wrong, however.]

      --
      Nerdy news for your nerdy needs? http://www.soylentnews.org Soylent News is people!
    3. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah ... the classic artificial intelligence dilemma. What is real intelligence?

      - Posting AC because its too hard to stay logged in

    4. Re:How? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      They don't want to filter stuff, they want to ban it. They already have a system in place whereby sites can be recorded for illegal contents (hate speech, and more recently "propaganda of drugs or suicide"), and all ISPs in the country have to block them - currently done by IP address, and if they happen to block a much larger site because of a single offending page they don't care in the slightest and the law permits it.

      Really, this whole slew of laws is just an excuse to build the Great Firewall of Russia, nothing more.

  42. Foul language, sex and violence - the new DRM! by itsdapead · · Score: 2

    All this internet censorship of foul language, gratuitous sex and graphic violence (possibly all at the same time) is really just HBO's latest scheme to stop people torrenting Game of Thrones...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  43. Re:Bye bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out. BTW, Fuck Russia!

  44. Committee name says it all by egamma · · Score: 1

    Committee name includes family, women, and children. Perhaps if their families included men the children wouldn't need the government to protect them.

    1. Re:Committee name says it all by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

      Sorry but men that protect their childen are systematically incarcerated here. Especially if the criminals are from Chechnya (remember Tsarnaev).

  45. Go Putin Yourself by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

    You can just go Yelena your Mizulina, you filthy Vitaly Milonov.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  46. Language is not constant by Rakishi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you ban all curse words then people will simply invent new curse words and, most likely, words that you can't ban. Or words that if they ban them have hilarious side effects. Like, say, Putin.

    Go putin yourself. You're such a putin. Your mother is such a putin.

    1. Re:Language is not constant by guru42101 · · Score: 1

      Just ask Rick Santorum ;)

    2. Re:Language is not constant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think the Russian government is going to be Putin up with that?

    3. Re:Language is not constant by richlv · · Score: 1

      in latvian the surname of that stupid fucked up bitch sounds somewhat similar to "the one who pees".
      the ignorant censorship promoting always-peeing shithead :)

      fhew. i'm not used to throwing that many curse words in, i should practice. a target is available :>

      --
      Rich
    4. Re:Language is not constant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tu putin-madre, hijo putin.

    5. Re:Language is not constant by microbox · · Score: 1

      Moral authoritarians never understand this. They have a different model of human nature that believes people need to be beaten into shape by threat of force.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    6. Re:Language is not constant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin = poo teen.

    7. Re:Language is not constant by bazorg · · Score: 1

      I think the French are ahead of you on that game...

    8. Re:Language is not constant by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In fact, many Russian bloggers have already introduced the word "to mizule" into their vocabulary. So far there have been no comprehension problems.

  47. This women by jonfr · · Score: 1

    This women can go and fuck herself. This is a excellent example what is happening in Russia, as this is nothing but censorship China style. Democracy is dead in Russia today, thanks to Putin and his evil minions.

    1. Re:This women by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      She may not go and do a non-traditional sex, sex with a non-traditional partner or a sex in non-traditional position since her previous law proposal banned just it. At least her speech in Duma has been understood just so.

  48. This is what we have to look forward to in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Britain, here we F78king come...

  49. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck that

  50. Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Violence it the true obsenity.

  51. Well, let me be the first to say by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Fuck that. Fuck your censorship. Fuck YOU.

    The entire world doesn't need to be made safe for children.

    Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker and tits.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Well, let me be the first to say by Svenia · · Score: 1

      I surprise myself by agreeing with this. I usually am not personally fond of people spewing profanity from their faces, but I also won't be the person to tell you not to. Do whatever you want, your words don't really offend me and I don't care all that much.

      My biggest issue is with people who think they need to child proof the world. Not all of us want children, not all of us care about your crouch spawn and I sure as hell am not going to change my behavior or what I read or watch or say because your precious Timmy can't handle a few F-bombs. I'm sure he hears them all the time when these 'It takes a community' parents fight, and I'm damned sure his friends and the TV are telling him the latest and newest.

      So as gstoddart said, "Fuck that. Fuck your censorship. Fuck YOU."

    2. Re:Well, let me be the first to say by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      You forgot to insult their worthless sack of shit dumb-ass motherfucking government officials. But we're good now with this thread.

    3. Re:Well, let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think this is about making the net safe for children? In Russia this will be used to censor Putin's political opponents.

  52. RFC 1855 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heck I would not doubt that in Russia http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 is the law of the net

  53. Another Reagan long term fail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this be another long term affect from the Reagan years? This isn't a rhetorical question, i am really looking for other's opinions.

    It has been in documentaries that the Reagan Admin's banking degulation is a big factor in today's current economic problems.
    The republican party wasn't near social conservative before Reagan as it is today.
    He really pushed Russia to become a democracy, but did it become one too fast that created an unstable situation that is possibly sliding back to a non democracy? I don't say communism, I am not sure what to call it. This last question I really would like other's input.

  54. everything old is new again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome back communist Russia...

  55. That would mean Russian would go away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are fewer 'foul' sounding words than those spoken in Russian. Perhaps they are committing ethnic suicide?

    1. Re:That would mean Russian would go away? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      We already are committing ethnic suicide. Or, more precisely, we are being replaced with more controllable electorate.

  56. Explanation needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the language is indeed banned, how are russian birds supposed to communicate?

  57. welcome by zlives · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome all such draconian laws, just moves the revolution that much closer, if they do get carried away.
    yayy ammo

  58. In other news by Jawcracker+Fuzz · · Score: 0

    Russian USB 3.0 developer proposes less profanity on LKML.

  59. Think of the children by PPH · · Score: 1

    First, stop daddy from chugging vodka and beating the wife and kids in a drunken stupor. I'm sure that does a lot more damage than the occasional What-The-Fuck.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Think of the children by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Daddy drinking vodka and beating the wife and kids has a better chance to vote politically correctly. You understand. The sober daddy loving his relatives makes too much damage with his ballot.

  60. Dash-cams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disable sound recording on all dash-cams, and they are already half way there.

  61. snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder snowden went to russia, he had more dirt to uncover

  62. Lets Consider Russia's Concept by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Ivan's problem isn't Ivan, but i don't see boat loads of people trying to live and work in russia. Could it be that there are people just as smart as Ivan? Could Ivan be the second coming? Or are people bascially smart enough so as to go on with their dreams, and have no problem ignoring Ivan?

    1. Re:Lets Consider Russia's Concept by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What was the actual question?

  63. slippery slope by NynexNinja · · Score: 1

    This is the slippery slope that I mentioned earlier in a post about the UK censorship of websites deemed to have "adult" content. First, it starts with websites that have "adult" content, then the censorship goes into many other types including bad words, anti-government or subversive content, anti-semitism content, political opponents speech, etc. Then it gets to a point where it will serach and replace on bad content and change it to good content or remove just the posts themselves so no one can see them. Once you have a content filter in place, its extremely easy to make it turn into the Great Firewall of China within a few months or years. This is why these things are just so damaging to the citizens of any country, especially ones that are founded on democratic principles. It doesn't make you more free, it takes away freedom. The bottom line is that when you pay for a pipe, you should get that pipe, not a pipe that has been changed or restricted in any way. To do so is censorship.

  64. Protect the children? by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

    This law is enacted nominally to protect the kids from foul language? What about us poor adults? 99% of the time I read or hear somebody egregiously misusing foul language, the author or speaker is underage. Ever go on XBox Live? Yeah. Tweets? Blogs? It's the same. That's not to say their elders don't drop a few cuss words here and there but by and far, in my experience, it's the younger set that are abusing those words. And I'm fairly certain they didn't learn those words from the Internet.

    So Russia, please stop wasting your time on pointless legislature. Better to spend your time working on an Internet-enabled "smack to the head" button; trust me, it will be far more effective at civilizing discourse on the world wide web.

    1. Re:Protect the children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >please stop wasting your time on pointless legislature

      Stop? That damn crazy printer just started running. Nobody is going to turn it off now.

    2. Re:Protect the children? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The law is enacted to provide (further) excuses for instituting pervasive government-mandated Internet filtering. It doesn't matter how efficient it is at its stated goal, and how silly that goal might be.

  65. Meanwhile... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    A solitary figure in 10 Downing Street wonders why he didn't think of this?

    For the children! For the women! For decency! For Czar Putin!

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  66. Russia is shit by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Playing the "think of the children" card, eh? Fuck You Russia!

  67. Curse Word Definitions by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    I don't curse. Ever. (Yes, I know I'm a freak of nature.) However, even *I* see this as a horrible thing. Why if people curse it's their responsibility. I'm also the parent of young kids and the fact that people curse online is the least of my concerns when my kids go online. (Higher up on the list are people who would try to scam them or harm them in some way.)

    Once Russia bans curse words, I predict a rise in "alternative" curse words. Instead of saying "the F word", they could say Frell. Instead of "the S word", they could say Scrap. Kind of like how the producers of MASH weren't allowed to use the word "virgin" in one episode so, in their next episode, they had someone say he was from the "Virgin Islands." People will rebel and find ways around the system. Then either the system will need to expand to include all possible words that could be used as curse words (pretty much the entire dictionary) or it will become so ineffective as to be useless for its intended purpose.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  68. To putin by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Poshel na hui! Idi ebyai svou mat!

  69. I... by lightknight · · Score: 1

    I...they do realize how much this infrastructure is going to cost, and how even after they pay for it, it's still not going to work right, da? I mean, it's going to cripple their economy, slow down their network speeds, introduce errors and additional work for both the techs and the courts, and increase complexity of their networks (something which makes engineers very, very unhappy...especially for 'features' like these).

    Just...you can't stop people from cursing in front of you, using their own mouths...what, exactly, makes you think this is somehow possible with the internet? I swear, it's like social people have zero understanding of how technology works...and even less how their own society, and human nature works, which is weird, since they're supposed to be the 'social' people. Morality can't be mandated since it's so ill-defined...every case of morality runs into scenarios where exceptions occur...hell, that's why there are so many philosophers, priests, etc. (aside from the cushy job, 3 minute work week, and nice perks) who spend such time trying to figure out, what, exactly, occurs in a moral situation where you've outlawed murder, and murder is the only way to prevent things from getting worse (hello military / police officers; was it justified, was there another way, or are we just violent animals? if non-lethal is supposed to be so effective, and better than guns, what do we do when someone uses it to torture someone else for hours? is not a gun better then, because it requires someone to really ask if they want to stand before a judge, explaining why they killed a suspect? or can no one be trusted to handle weaponry, since every situation allows for abuse?). That kind of stuff.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  70. Fuck Putin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Putin!

    "This is Barack Obama, and I approve of this message."

  71. All the censors agree: by ebietoo · · Score: 1

    Do it for the kids, yeah!

  72. Fuck Russia by msobkow · · Score: 1

    That is all.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  73. A classic poster by 21mhz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An oldie, yet very apropos, from Artemy Lebedev of the OLED keyboard fame.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  74. Niksput! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Tell them where to be putin it!

  75. Fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any site involved better tell them to fuck off.

    Any web site that goes along with it, may be subject to retaliations from the public, or Anonymous.

    1. Re:Fuck off by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Any site involved better tell them to fuck off.

      Any web site that goes along with it, may be subject to retaliations from the public, or Anonymous.

      it's russia.. they're subject to retaliations of authority.

      basically it'll be a ban on saying that putin is an asshole.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  76. Let me guess by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Pussy Riot members are about to get out of jail? And Pussy is included in the list of "swear" words? Let me google it. Hmm, 2 years sentence passed down on August 2012, but they were arrested in March 2012, so if they get timed served, then March 2014. So to me, the timing is about right.

    I guess Putin really fears the Pussy.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:Let me guess by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      "Pussy Riot" never translate their name in Russian, I would imagine largely so because there's no equivalently ambiguous play on words there. So it's not obscene in Russian because it's not Russian, and they could argue that its intended meaning is not obscene in English if it ever comes to that.

      (Though it's far more likely that they'll just do another "performance" as soon as they're out, and will be back in jail on similar charges.)

  77. Fuck child pornography & human trafficking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foul language is a real problem.

  78. Russa is like UK... by lefin1 · · Score: 1

    ! . Really? Seriously?