i think you are trying too hard to split hairs. You are describing "scientific methods" and scientific methods (abbreviated to science) are used to wade through the evidence, tests etc until a theory is either formed or the hypothesis is deemed wrong.
Creationism is definitely not science but evolution is certainly science, give up trying to put cretinism in the same league, it just isn't.
no you can't teach Creationism as an example of a theory that is wrong with very high probability, you can only teach it as a religious based guess with no proof. Creationism has no right to be associated with a "theory", at absolute best its a hypothesis
oh what bollox, creationism is religion based as is all the other religions belief on how the human race became into being. Cretinists always forget that every religion has a delusion of how humans started.
Dyson is an engineer who improves current technology and he's improved the vacuum cleaner. Your complaints are trivial nitpicking ones, the bagless model outperforms the bagged models by a long way and in every way. If he did say he's improved Tesla motor design, he probably has because to use a Telsa motor made in Telsa's time in this day and age would be inefficient, everything made in this world gets improved on, its called "progress". Wind your neck in and get a perspective on life
you'd better find all the boycotters then, i'm sure they'd help you until they start whining about what you create..... Good luck, we might come and visit your site and make constructive criticism of it.
thats the typical way the religious interpret the bible so whats wrong with that, the religious only cherry pick the good secular bits and hide the bad religious stuff so don't point that accusation at people criticizing the bible
Anonymous Cowards are still as full of bullshit as they ever were, perhaps no-one will miss them when the beta goes live - fuck off to Digg or reddit or better still "My little Pony" (its about the correct age for them)
Slashdot Mirror
"Creationism is an excellent example for a theory with very low confidence in it, use it as such."
No it isn't, i will just correct that statement for you.
Creationism is an excellent example of complete bollox promoted only by the Abrahamic based religious "
you need to read more... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
i think you are trying too hard to split hairs. You are describing "scientific methods" and scientific methods (abbreviated to science) are used to wade through the evidence, tests etc until a theory is either formed or the hypothesis is deemed wrong.
Creationism is definitely not science but evolution is certainly science, give up trying to put cretinism in the same league, it just isn't.
no you can't teach Creationism as an example of a theory that is wrong with very high probability, you can only teach it as a religious based guess with no proof. Creationism has no right to be associated with a "theory", at absolute best its a hypothesis
oh what bollox, creationism is religion based as is all the other religions belief on how the human race became into being. Cretinists always forget that every religion has a delusion of how humans started.
"Creationism actually is a theory" -
bollox, look up definition of theory in a scientific context.
Maybe Einstein would disagree with you and probably the all scientists in the world would as well
"He ignored everyone else who made little improvements to the motor and seemed to say that he is as good as Tesla. " -
i think thats a mis-interpretation of what he allegedly said by you
"This man is NOT an inventor." - Correct. Dyson is an engineer, not an inventor. If you check his website he has a job title of "Chief Engineer"
Dyson is an engineer, not an inventor. If you check his website he has a job title of "Chief Engineer"
"They do have a nice fat ball that keeps them from cleaning under any couches, though."
thats what the handle is for, its a detachable hose similar to the old tech vacuums, Dysons have 2 methods of cleaning
Dyson is an engineer who improves current technology and he's improved the vacuum cleaner. Your complaints are trivial nitpicking ones, the bagless model outperforms the bagged models by a long way and in every way. If he did say he's improved Tesla motor design, he probably has because to use a Telsa motor made in Telsa's time in this day and age would be inefficient, everything made in this world gets improved on, its called "progress". Wind your neck in and get a perspective on life
sounds like you want to join the Amish.....
you'd better find all the boycotters then, i'm sure they'd help you until they start whining about what you create..... Good luck, we might come and visit your site and make constructive criticism of it.
by opening up the casing to replace the HDD?
we won't miss you, its only the twats and old dogs who can;t learn new tricks going
just fuck off and boycott to your hearts content, i totally fed up with it. get to the head of the queue and go now
you should spend your time here www.disney.com as it is targeted at your mental age group and take all your supporters with you
the quicker the boycott starts the better so why not start now so we don't have to read/ignore your puerile childish shit
you are posting to the wrong article, this is about LinkedIn
FUCK YOURSELF
we won't miss you
"Again, you're totally cherry picking here."
thats the typical way the religious interpret the bible so whats wrong with that, the religious only cherry pick the good secular bits and hide the bad religious stuff so don't point that accusation at people criticizing the bible
Anonymous Cowards are still as full of bullshit as they ever were, perhaps no-one will miss them when the beta goes live - fuck off to Digg or reddit or better still "My little Pony" (its about the correct age for them)
fucking moaning beta prats like you interferes with my faith in humanity.