Slashdot Mirror


Customer: Dell Denies Speaker Repair Under Warranty, Blames VLC

An anonymous reader writes "VLC is incapable of increasing the actual power past 100%, all that is being done is the waveform is being modified to be louder within the allowed constraints. But, that didn't stop Dell from denying warranty service for speaker damage if the popular VLC Media Player is installed on a Dell laptop. Also we got a report that service was denied because KMPlayer was installed on a laptop. The warranty remains valid on the other parts of the laptop. VLC player developer [Jean-Baptiste Kempf] denied the issue with VLC and further claimed that the player cannot be used to damage speakers. How can I convince Dell to replace my laptop speaker which is still in warranty? Or class action is only my option?"

526 comments

  1. Re:Tell them... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0, Troll

    Grasshopper ALWAYS wrong, in argument with chicken.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  2. Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Pessime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Find some way to ruin the whole unit in a way that doesn't void the warranty. Start a process that uses lots of power so your chips are working hard, and wrap it up in a hot blanket. Or something along those lines.

    1. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

      look, you're not fooling anyone. they stopped selling blanket warrantys years ago.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by StripedCow · · Score: 0

      Or put the unit in a (microwave) oven.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    3. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what ever your problem is , microwave the entire unit is the solution.

      Nuke them from orbit, its the only way to be sure

    4. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or put the unit in a (microwave) oven.

      That doesn't really give you unlimited access to pot. Don't believe everything you see on TV. http://southpark.wikia.com/wik...

    5. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      What do you mean, "find a way"?

      It's a Dell. It's going to fail during the warranty period without requiring any shenanigans from the poster.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That line is getting old.

    7. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Xenx · · Score: 2

      They put a lot of money into making sure that most fail in the 1 to 3 month window after the warranty expires. They wouldn't want to ruin that by having too many fail under warranty.

    8. Re: Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by chromeronin799 · · Score: 1

      And the speaker on the dell are so shitty anyway, it actually a blessing if they don't work. However bad dells are though, it's not as bad as Lenovo. The only laptop work has given me where I'd rather have the Dell back.

    9. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ex Dell grunt here. They fucked me and my town over, and are fucking over shareholders by going Private (the first thing they did when they no longer had to answer public questions was to outsource a bunch of jobs to themselves, the same thing they did to fuck my town over), so let me tell you how to fuck back.

      Escalate to a manager. The managers almost always capitulate. Doubly so if you keep calling back and keep escalating. Typically they bump you to a "resolution manager" which is just a Tier 2 tech with a very specifically worded title (Resolution Manager - see, they're MANAGERS) to prevent you from having to escalate directly to someone in charge. Escalate again, and you'll get a real manager.

      If you have a sales rep working with you, contact them directly. The sales reps will give you what you want to shut you up. If your employer or school has a Dell contract, THEIR sales rep can usually help - contact your IT staff or University's IT staff and see if they can help you. I replaced many a laptop part I shouldn't have because it was one of my contact's "boss's laptop" and they totally needed me to save them. And some universities are on a "just give the fuckers what they want" basis - the assclowns at Quinnipiac were the worst for this.

      Email support may be a better route - email support is usually handled by more advanced techs, often by people in the US or Canada.

      Don't threaten legal action directly, they have policies in place that basically say to end the call and blacklist you if you do.

      If you manage to get the idiots in consumer (India) annoyed enough at you they'll punt you over to their Pro Support for business just to be rid of you, who will capitulate if they can. It depends on the mood of the managers, they're not SUPPOSED to be working on non Pro Support systems. Unless they're workstations, because the Workstation customers usually can't deal with India.

      It's entirely possible the script has been updated to try and fuck you over if you ever use non-standard software on the PC, since Dell is bleeding money and can't afford to honor their warranties anymore. Keep fighting. You paid for that warranty and you're literally owed replacement speakers.

    10. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that would fall under an abuse clause in the warranty.

    11. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Then they'll say customer misuse and deny the claim. Now the poor guy is without an entire laptop.

    12. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you forgot the most important piece of advice: Don't buy a Dell next time!

    13. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by labnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well you are getting warmer.(Well warmer than any of the other posts I've read yet)

      There are only two ways to destroy a speaker.
      Overpowering (99%+ of cases), and Mechanical failure due to cone overextension.
      Speakers are rated in Watts (RMS) and appear like a resistor that varies a bit with frequency.
      If you take a 1W(RMS) speaker and match it to a 1W(RMS) amplifier, there is still a chance you can damage the speaker by overdriving it with a square wave which has 1.4 times the energy of a sine wave.
      Thus because VLC has 200% volume function, you could take a peaklimited song and clip it from a 'sine' to a 'square' wave and damage the speaker. Unlikely, but possible and good engineer would take this into account when designing the system.

      --
      46137
    14. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Buy a mac, made well and the warranty is honored, should you need it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    15. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely, but possible and good engineer would take this into account when designing the system.

      Dell

      I think we've found the problem.

    16. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And they're not fooling anyone either.

      If there is software that can damage those speakers in the manner that Dell's trying to claim, it fails upon UCC 2-314 and UCC 2-315 out of box.

      Per Mangusson-Moss, it's not legally possible for them to claim that their warranty is voided just because there is a piece of software put onto the machine because they didn't limit their warranty in this case in writing (and if they did put it in a fine-print manner, few would buy and they'd be in deep trouble with the Texas and other States Deceptive Trade Practices Act for doing so- because it's something that is deemed unconscionable (In fact, the TDTPA has the act in question as a laundry-list item for the law...it's illegal out of box...)) and therefore, they have to PROVE (not just CLAIM) that it was the software in question for Mangusson-Moss to NOT apply here, that they did something deliberate to damage the product. Because of the explanation from one of the VLC crowd on the forum pretty much shoots that out of the water (Not realistically possible to damage the speakers unless the speakers were substandard or defective...), the Warranty STANDS. At this point, Dell has one of three options allowed them by the Uniform Commercial Code: Fix, Replace, or Refund. Seriously.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    17. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by v1 · · Score: 1

      Hardware that allows software to easily damage it is designed wrong. If your OS crashes, it can basically do anything Murphy's Law dictates, within the bounds of what the hardware will try to humor it on. Hardware has to be designed to protect itself against flippy software because it's gonna happen from time to time. I'm not saying that all hardware needs to be 100% software-proof, but it needs to be, within reasonable limits. The sound hardware blowing out your speaker cone because your software tried to turn the volume up to 1e+15 is a hardware/firmware issue that should be covered under warranty.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    18. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude...you're getting a Hell... (Have to agree, ranging from exploding batteries to laptops that fail because of poor thermal management (The GPU bakes itself to death, sometimes just failing, sometimes shorting out and taking the power-supply on the mainboard with it...) often on the first and sometimes second generations of their high-end lineup...) you're dead on for the claim there...)

    19. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For how much longer, though?

    20. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I agree but that has nothing to do with deliberately damaging other parts of the warrantied item. Two wrongs don't make a right.

    21. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the solution would be to set the BIOS clock forward a few months, to ensure it fails within the warranty period.

    22. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      And they're not fooling anyone either.

      If there is software that can damage those speakers in the manner that Dell's trying to claim, it fails upon UCC 2-314 and UCC 2-315 out of box.

      Per Mangusson-Moss, it's not legally possible for them to claim that their warranty is voided just because there is a piece of software put onto the machine because they didn't limit their warranty in this case in writing ....snip....

      It should be impossible for software to damage modern hardware. Full stop...

      Back in the 60's +/- there was a rumor of an IBM computer where a microcode
      loop could over-heat a transistor and cause the machine to fail. There was a flap
      about it but in the end the heat-sink was improved (or something). I cannot recall
      if it was a discrete transistor or an ECL package (serious power stuff).

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    23. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by redback · · Score: 1

      but what if you want a usable keyboard and mouse?

    24. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      And one should design for those limits instead of falling back on "it's the software"- it's a brown paper bag moment to have breakable parts like that exposed in the firmware so that drivers or applications can break things.

      I don't know about you, but I've spent decades making sure on digital designs and the like you CAN'T do that sort of thing. I can't be the ONLY one doing it- and it wasn't acceptable then for those items (they got REPLACED on the spot...) and it's not acceptable now (and it's illegal, pretty much like I said, to DO it the way Dell's playing it.)

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    25. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Well I do have to admit that when I took my Mac into the shop the guy at the Genius Bar didn't even blink when I told him it was running Linux. So none of this "you are running the wrong software" shenanigans there.

      On the other hand, that's the only brand name machine I've never needed to get warranty work done on.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Cassini2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The old 68000 processor (of Apple Macintosh fame) had an instruction that would turn the address and data buses into high-speed counters for diagnostic purposes. Unfortunately, this instruction could also overheat the chip if ran for too long.

      User's dubbed the assembly mnemonic as: HCF, Halt and Catch Fire!

    27. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by countach74 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It should be impossible for software to damage modern hardware. Full stop...

      I'm not so sure about that, especially considering the way speakers cool themselves. If you crank the volume up to the point where you're essentially sending constant, large square waves to the speaker, you're literally telling the speaker, "OK, move all of the way in and stay there for a while. Now, move very quickly all of the way out and stay there for a while." The voice coil of a speaker is cooled by the speaker moving in and out and *not* staying in one place; it is a fundamental assumption that all speakers (that I know of) rely on. If you pump a ton of power into the voice coil and force the speaker to stay relatively stationary, expect a failure: the shielding around the voice coil will deteriorate and you will end up with a short circuit. So while VLC cannot send more than 100% power, it can cause the speaker to operate in such a fashion that is unintended and dangerous to the life of the speaker.

      Your solution may be that, "the voice coil should be designed to withstand this sort of [ab]use." But that is purely ideological and will likely lead to increased costs for manufacturers; it may also yield less powerful or inferior sound reproduction systems. I'm not sure what the consequences of such a mandate would be, but I'm almost certain neither of us would care for them.

      To be clear though, I am not saying that Dell should void the warranty over this, only that the belief that "it should be impossible for software to damage modern hardware" is likely flawed.

    28. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Your solution may be that, "the voice coil should be designed to withstand this sort of [ab]use." But that is purely ideological and will likely lead to increased costs for manufacturers; it may also yield less powerful or inferior sound reproduction systems. I'm not sure what the consequences of such a mandate would be, but I'm almost certain neither of us would care for them.

      Given that websites can play arbitrary sounds in default configurations of all popular browsers, and have been able to do so for ages (albeit with means varying over time), this is a remote attack vector. If a website can blow out your speakers simply by playing a wave of a certain shape, it's an exploit and has to be fixed. And it seems evident that the proper fix should be on the hardware side of things, since there's too much software out there that would have to be fixed to close the hole.

    29. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course, they will fuck you on warranty to the point where EU had to tell them to stop. But hey, it's apple, so even them fucking entire nations on warranty is a great feature!

    30. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all modern CPUs, GPU cards, memory sticks, hard drives and so on fall into this category. I suggest you think again about your criteria.

    31. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Remove initial HDD, clone to your own. In case of warranty repairs, give back with original HDD. That way you also do not have to give them all your data if something breaks. I do that routinely.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    32. Re: Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that the indian tech support model, (no not the credit fraudsters) is now a model for the industry now. wait until dell finds out you've been using slashdot beta. Now, while admittedly, Beta NEVER KILLED ANYBODY,(yet) why tempt fate?

    33. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except for the fact that the speakers are typically AC coupled through a capacitor which means you can't just drive them with a long-duration DC signal.

    34. Re: Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what is this moral false dilemma? what deliberate damage? Any tech worth his salt knows the best way to test the frequency response of speakers is to bridge the memory slot with a fork and listen for static!
      How do yo test your system? Beta software, i bet.

    35. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They absolutely should design for that. For example, by putting a capacitor in series with the coil (common practice) to reject anything too close to DC. It would cost a whole penny. If anything, it would improve the quality of the sound by not allowing infrasonics to sap amplifier power (these are laptop speakers, not sub-woofers).

      The old Apple ][ had a push-pull speaker. You could go from full push to full pull by toggling a bit register. Nothing you could do in software would damage it including driving it at ultrasonic frequency with a variable duty cycle to generate a somewhat scratchy digital audio output.

      When speaker and amp are paired in an integrated unit, they should absolutely be matched so that the speakers cannot be burned out.

      As a side note, vlc outputting above 100% is nothing like a low frequency squarewave. It is very much like what is done in a 'hot mix' on a CD, so if vlc can burn out the speaker, so can playing a modern CD.

    36. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Especially since any pop music CD you might play will have similar tricks on it to make it play loud.

    37. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      no.. sue them for messing about your harddisk and data when they were supposed to just fix the fucking speaker.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    38. Re: Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found a stun gun and paperclips work well for that.

    39. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I disagree. A speaker should be designed to handle a DC source at its given specs. If it cannot, then its power rating due to overheating or whatever else, it should be derated until the current is low enough to handle the situation without damage. Look, I appreciate all the effort that goes into miniaturizing speakers but sometimes things have to be reasonably sturdy. Imagine a bridge collapses and the chief design engineer just throws up his arms and says "Well, I didn't expect a traffic jam on the bridge, this was far beyond the average load." No, you put in fatter rebars and put in bigger supports until the thing doesn't come down even in the worst case scenario.

      A speaker coil tilting like that is bad design, period. It's just like putting in a component based on its "typical" performance in the data sheet instead of min/max. Yea, it may work in "the average case", but it's shoddy design that would make even a buck-a-pop Chinese power supply vendor blush with shame.

    40. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Well I do have to admit that when I took my Mac into the shop the guy at the Genius Bar didn't even blink when I told him it was running Linux. So none of this "you are running the wrong software" shenanigans there.

      As a counter-example, I had "you are running the wrong wireless access point" problems from the Genius bar. My wife was seeing occasional DNS resolution failures and generally slow web browsing, which turned out to be packet loss between the laptop and the access point. At least two techs immediately argued that the problem must be the access point, and that we should replace it with an AirPort. It took four tries (phone calls and in-person) to find someone who would honor ping statistics from a variety of wireless devices.

    41. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by countach74 · · Score: 2

      I never said it was like a low frequency square wave. And it's not really like a "hot mix"; it takes that to an extreme (but, let's face it, hot mixes are all ready pretty extreme). The point is, the closer you get to square wave range, 1) the more potential for damage exists, 2) the worse things sound. Perhaps the best example as to what I'm referring to is taking a CD produced 20 or 30 years ago, put it in a high powered sound system and crank it up towards the upper limits of the sound system[1]. Now, take a "hot mix" CD from yesterday and put it in the system. Do not be surprised if speakers blow. My point is, there's enough color to the signal that I don't think a simple filter will do the trick. That and, yes, what I'm referring to with VLC going "above 100%" is that it's essentially making an extreme "hot mix" and that is dangerous.

      [1] Even CD's produced 20 or 30 years ago are still normalized, I'm quite sure. The peak power output between the old CD and the new should be roughly equivalent; any difference should be due entirely to how well the mix covers the frequency spectrum (definite edge to new CD). It's amazing what mass quantities of compression and limiting can do to speakers.

    42. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by countach74 · · Score: 1

      It's not just the shape of the wave, but the amount of power behind it, how much heat that generates on the voice coil, and how resilient the voice coil is. Such an exploit would only work under ideal circumstances: most likely, a high-powered sound system turned up very loud. I mean, it's not exactly rocket science to not surf the internet with your computer plugged into a high-powered system with the volume cranked to 11. :)

      Honestly, I have not read the article and I am not at all familiar with the details of what happened in this particular case. My comment was directed solely at the comment to which I replied. That said, my guess is that, if Dell is being even remotely honest (and they have every reason to be), their conclusion that the customer abused the sound system is very likely true. I would be rather surprised if you can't blow any decent sound system by maxing out its volume knob and sending 200% (or whatever the maximum volume is) VLC music through it.

    43. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by countach74 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, in the real world, we have to deal with compromise. What you call bad design, others call a bargain. Not every component is designed for every workload; even bridges are designed with load assumptions. It is not economically viable to make everything to the greatest durability possible. If it is important to you that every single thing be as min/max'ed as possible, you are welcome to find a manufacturer that obliges such tastes and fork over a premium for it.

      Also:

      A speaker should be designed to handle a DC source at its given specs. If it cannot, then its power rating due to overheating or whatever else, it should be derated until the current is low enough to handle the situation without damage.

      That is asinine. It is the speaker that draws power; it is not up to some "rating" to determine how much power is given to the speaker. If you plug a 200W speaker into a 100W amplifier and open the amplifier up to full, that 200W speaker will try to draw 200 watts of power, likely overwhelming and destroying the amplifier.

    44. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bought your last Mac over fifteen years ago?

    45. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I read too much into 'a while'. Sorry about that. Bass is more likely to cause the problem though.

      My point is that since such hot mixes are very common, it's not really fair to consider it a corner case when designing hardware. It WILL be called upon to play such audio with or without VLC.

      When dealing with small audio systems (and a laptop's built in audio is certainly not an audiophile setup), it's easy to make sure the speaker spec has enough margin that burnout is practically impossible. It's important to do that since any audio player can output exactly what VLC does just by pre-processing the recording (either out of ignorance or maliciously).

    46. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by pantaril · · Score: 1

      If installed VLC is the reason for the denial, i'd just uninstall VLC before sending the laptop for warranty repair.

    47. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by dpiven · · Score: 1

      [While] VLC cannot send more than 100% power, it can cause the speaker to operate in such a fashion that is unintended and dangerous to the life of the speaker.

      You could make the same statement about Windows Media Player, or any other audio source.

      In order for Dell to successfully claim that VLC is a warranty-breaker, Dell would have to prove that given the same input data, VLC causes Dell's on-board audio hardware to generate signals that damage speakers in such a way that WMP, iTunes, Winamp, etc. do not.

      Dell still doesn't escape liability, because the actual signal claimed to damage the speaker came from hardware spec'ed and installed by Dell -- they would have to claim that their audio chip was not designed to accept for all foreseeable digital inputs.

    48. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by guyniraxn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've had luck by emailing Michael Dell himself. I had bought my mother an All-in-One that failed within a couple months, due to harddrive failure. After getting dicked around by support who insisted that the warranty was expired, even going so far as to manually change it so the next time I went online it showed expired. I had a previous screenshot of the warranty with my tag number from their website and a dated invoice, sent that to big ole Mike with some choice words about how I will never buy another Dell and advise against anyone else doing so (being that I'm the "tech guy" amongst my family and friends). I finished the email with "Thanks for nothing!" The next day I was contacted by Executive Customer Support and scheduled someone to come to me to replace the harddrive.

    49. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      High frequency square waves are far more likely to damage than low frequency.

      Once you move well above the rate the speaker can move (i.e trying to send treble through high power woofers) the magnetic flux caused by the speaker trying to move at high frequency but being unable to keep up causes far more damage when coupled with the electrical energy than just the electrical energy itself.

      At low frequency it only has to deal with the electrical energy. At high, the dynamics of the magnetism come into play and act as a multiplier

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    50. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      What you quoted says ... if it can't handle 100 watts worth of DC, then its not a 100 watt speaker, it should be derated until to whatever steady DC current it can withstand. If it CAN handle 50 watts of DC, then its a 50 watt speaker, not 100 watt speaker.

      What you're saying is that if it says its a 100 watt speaker ... that a 200watt amp can blow it ... well no shit Sherlock. Glad you figured that out all by yourself.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    51. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      That is asinine. It is the speaker that draws power; it is not up to some "rating" to determine how much power is given to the speaker. If you plug a 200W speaker into a 100W amplifier and open the amplifier up to full, that 200W speaker will try to draw 200 watts of power, likely overwhelming and destroying the amplifier.

      Erm... that makes no sense, you know. The speaker doesn't know what the volume control is set at, so if it wanted to draw 200W regardless, your volume control would be useless. Furthermore, you only get a sound signal when the current changes. As the impedance of the speaker is approximately constant (yes, the magnetic field does increase the impedance above the plain electrical resistance of the speaker coil) and as P = I-squared R, you wouldn't get any audible sound at all if the speaker was attempting to draw constant 200W (or perhaps you get one-bit digital audio, which wouldn't be much good to anyone.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    52. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The only reason for this "Hot Mix" thing you speak of is to take advantage of the human predisposition to favor a slightly higher sound pressure level as better quality. If a sound is overall 0.2dB louder, it will be considered better quality.

      These sorts of mixes lose dynamic range and shrink the noise floor. Such shit.

    53. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yea, buy some home built POS with no warranty or warranties from many different manufactures who can blame each other.

      Seriously, anyone who works with more than just their own PC is an idiot for avoiding big name makers like Dell. You'll spend more time building machine than you'll pay for one from Dell. If it takes you 4 hours or more from start to finish to build a PC and get it on a users desk, you're losing money doing it yourself, worse still, you're too inexperienced to even realize how wasteful you are.

      Or did you mean someone else who makes PCs like Dell but behaves better ... if you did, who might that be?

      No, your friends little beige box shop down the street is not better because they didn't spend the ridiculous amount of time Dell spends making sure drivers work properly on a specific installation.

      Your post is the sound of some first year intern assembling PCs for some small company some where.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    54. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Thats why you buy a Mac.

      Keyboards are fantastic, at my former job we ended up replacing all keyboards with Mac keyboards after people used the couple of macs a few times for various reasons.

      Multi-touch trackpads are FAR superior to mice for most work. I still prefer a mouse for FPS games, but anything else, give me a multi-touch track pad.

      Second to that is the Apple mighty mouse. Its 0 buttons! OMFG what would you DO!??!?!

      The surface is a multitouch surface so you have a mouse and trackpad in one. If I could get used to it, I'm positive this would be almost ideal for all situations, but alas, I can't get used to it. The might mouse can sense 5 taps at a time, so its effectively a 5 button mouse, not a 1.

      Basically, everything about Mac keyboards and mice are far superior to what you're working with, you just are too ignorant to know it and keep spewing some shit you heard 15 years ago that hasn't been true for the past 10.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    55. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      2004, 2006, 2009 laptops all extremely well made and even serviceable. The 2013 is less serviceable, but, when the time comes in 5-8 years, I'm sure I'll take it apart and service the fans or drop in a bigger faster PCIe flash drive. Oh, and these laptops are used daily to as little as a couple of times a week, at least the 2004 was, it's been sold off for a couple of years now.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    56. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Never had an issue with their warranty service. Had 2 batteries replaced, no questions, and a refurb mini that had a bizarre issue booting was replaced with a brand new one (I did go in with an exact description of the problem and what I'd already tried in isolating it). The phone was a simple walk in, here's the problem - walk out with a brand new phone in less than 15 min. I'm sure someone somewhere has been screwed, but my experiences have been even in excess of what I would expect.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    57. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      good engineer would take this into account when designing the system.

      Found yer problem!

      Clipped signals (no sign that VLC does this, or is the only software capable of this, etc) can indeed ruin speakers being driven at a fraction of their rated wattage. And, presuming that whoever spec'd the speaker AND whoever spec'd the amp circuit both took this into account is pretty crazy. They said to themselves "does it meet the requirement and is it cheap enough? Great use it."

    58. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      I've owned just about every major brand of router including some of the "good" ones (WRT-54G) which, modified or not, all were complete and total crap hardware in comparison to the Airport Extreme. I run VPNs constantly, and with any of the other routers, I'd get drops, reconnects, and lost connections regularly. I would reboot them usually weekly, and a few almost daily. It got worse as more neighbors got connected, channel hopping didn't help. Finally broke down and paid what I considered the Airport Extreme "tax", mainly because business class A/B and G routers were starting at $400 at the time, and couldn't be happier. It's been rebooted maybe 4 times in the past 2 years, for updates. I don't loose connections. Essentially, it just works. "Business" class connectivity starts below $200 now. BTW, the drops were most common on Dell / IBM laptops.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    59. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Read the summary and you'll see that we're not talking about a high powered audio system; We're talking about built-in Laptop audio. I have yet to see a modern laptop with a hardware volume control potentiometer (volume knob) that controls the voltage going to the speakers. Instead, the manufactures hard wire the volume to a specific resistance so these speakers are running at a maximum limit 100% of the time that they are turned on. Understand that I'm not saying the manufacturers are having the speaker system running at full bore 100% of the time, but they're being hardware limited to what is supposed to be a safe level below that to ensure that the speakers don't blow themselves out. On these systems, the volume control buttons will operate the Volume Control applet of the Operating System to control the loudness within the range from mute to the hardware limited maximum.

      In this way it would be theoretically possible, if the volume control hardware is defective in design and the Volume Control applet had the right vulnerabilities, to be able to build a malicious web page that could crank up the volume on the laptop and generate a waveform that would damage the user's speakers.

      This leads me in the belief that Dell is covering up a defect in the laptop speaker control design to avoid having to perform a costly recall on the affected models.

    60. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's wrong. Connect a 200W speaker to a 100W amp, and the most you'll produce is still 100W (and a correctly designed amp rated to 100W continuous will not expire under these conditions).

    61. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's not going to happen. Every audio system will essentially have filters in its design - a capacitor that will block signals near DC (so you can't move the speaker to one position and keep it there) and a low pass filter that will remove unwanted high frequency components of the signal. You can't send a signal to a speaker in any sanely designed audio system and keep the speaker in one position for any appreciable length of time.

    62. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      If you never meant a low frequency square wave, then you're not going to keep the speaker in one position for any length of time (which was your original hypothesis).

      As the frequency gets higher and higher, it will look less and less like a square wave. The amplifier design will likely include a low pass filter somewhere in its design which will limit the fastest rise and fall time of the wave form. As the frequency gets close to the upper end of the audible range (say above ~12 to 15KHz or so) you'll probably find the amplitude of the signal reaching the speaker starts to roll off even if you send a maximum amplitude square wave to the input of the audio amplifier. Your square wave will at best look like a triangle or sawtooth wave and will be decreasing in amplitude more and more until it has virtually disappeared.

      Some time ago I measured a square wave through a simple audio circuit (a typical amplifier in a modern laptop will perform rather better, but it still shows what will happen to a square wave as the frequency increases as it passes through a typical audio amplifier), and I still have the screen grabs from the oscilloscope. Let me demonstrate:

      Waveform 1 (lowest frequency): http://photo.alioth.net/tmp2/b...
      Waveform 2 (mid frequency): http://photo.alioth.net/tmp2/b...
      Waveform 3 (highish frequency): http://photo.alioth.net/tmp2/b...
      Waveform 4 (highest): http://photo.alioth.net/tmp2/b...

      The square wave input was of identical amplitude for each of these, the only thing changed was the frequency. As I said the low pass filter in a typical amplifier found in a laptop's audio circuit won't start seriously attenuating the circuit anywhere near as low as this particular circuit, but it certainly will do the same in any case.

      An audio designer who doesn't expect square waves at full design amplitude to go through his system is described by one word: "negligent". Typical 1980s analogue synthesizers often generated square waves, so you have to expect that some sound might contain a lot of square wave content. If a square wave not exceeding rated power can kill the Dell's speaker or audio circuit, then the product is defective and they should fix it under warranty, as warranties are supposed to fix defects caused by bad workmanship.

    63. Re: Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      You might want to consider bringing this story to The Consumerist website (consumerist.com). They seem to be pretty good at extracting customer satisfaction when companies play this kind of bullshit.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    64. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Precisely, a *good* engineer would take this into account.

      Warranties are supposed to take care of faults through defective design and workmanship. An audio subsystem that allows software to destroy it (doubly so if it lets userland software destroy it) is defective workmanship.

    65. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by david672orford · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, in the real world, we have to deal with compromise. What you call bad design, others call a bargain. Not every component is designed for every workload; even bridges are designed with load assumptions. It is not economically viable to make everything to the greatest durability possible. If it is important to you that every single thing be as min/max'ed as possible, you are welcome to find a manufacturer that obliges such tastes and fork over a premium for it.

      He is not saying that everything should be designed for maximum durability. He is saying that things should be designed so that they don't break the first itme something a little unusual happens. A bridge which collapses under a bumper-to-bumper traffic jam is defective. A laptop computer sound system which breaks if certain sounds are played with the volume all the way up is also defective. (After all, laptops are frequently operated with he volumn all the way up.) Here Dell is claiming that VLC filtered the sound in a certain way and that their speakers are not designed to play that sound. That is just silly. It is as silly as a highway bridge designer who says that he didn't know that his bridge was suppose to be able to handle bumper-to-bumper traffic.

      That is asinine. It is the speaker that draws power; it is not up to some "rating" to determine how much power is given to the speaker. If you plug a 200W speaker into a 100W amplifier and open the amplifier up to full, that 200W speaker will try to draw 200 watts of power, likely overwhelming and destroying the amplifier.

      Actually, no, higher wattage speakers do not automatically draw more power. The power rating on a speaker specifies the amount of power which the amplier can pump through the speaker without damaging it. How much power actually goes into the speaker is determined by the number of volts which the amplifier puts on the line and the impediance of the speaker (which is generally 4 or 8 ohms). With the volume control set to zero there are zero volts on the line and the speaker is consuming zero power, no matter what its rating. As we raise the volume the voltage rises and the speaker starts consuming power and producing sound. As we raise the volume the amplifier will get to a point where it is producing the maximum voltage of which it is physically capable. That may be less than the speaker could endure, but so what?

      Saying that speakers with a too-high power rating will blow an amplifier is like saying that tires with a too-high speed rating will cause a car to go too fast. How fast the car goes depends on how strong the engine is and how much you press the gas pedal, not no how strongly the tires are constructed.

    66. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by david672orford · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that would fall under an abuse clause in the warranty.

      The 'abuse' we are talking about is basically "turning the volume up too high". That might make sense if a high-powered audio system had been damaged where the "too high" means deafening. But this is a laptop. Frequently "all the way up" still isn't high enough to hear clearly.

    67. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be impossible for software to damage modern hardware. Full stop...

      I'm not so sure about that, especially considering the way speakers cool themselves. If you crank the volume up to the point where you're essentially sending constant, large square waves to the speaker, you're literally telling the speaker, "OK, move all of the way in and stay there for a while. Now, move very quickly all of the way out and stay there for a while." The voice coil of a speaker is cooled by the speaker moving in and out and *not* staying in one place; it is a fundamental assumption that all speakers (that I know of) rely on. If you pump a ton of power into the voice coil and force the speaker to stay relatively stationary, expect a failure: the shielding around the voice coil will deteriorate and you will end up with a short circuit. So while VLC cannot send more than 100% power, it can cause the speaker to operate in such a fashion that is unintended and dangerous to the life of the speaker.

      Your solution may be that, "the voice coil should be designed to withstand this sort of [ab]use." But that is purely ideological and will likely lead to increased costs for manufacturers; it may also yield less powerful or inferior sound reproduction systems. I'm not sure what the consequences of such a mandate would be, but I'm almost certain neither of us would care for them.

      To be clear though, I am not saying that Dell should void the warranty over this, only that the belief that "it should be impossible for software to damage modern hardware" is likely flawed.

      if that were the case, then dell could void the warranty even with windows media player... there's nothing VLC does that other players won't do.

    68. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      The problem is not amplifier power, nor is it a "volume knob set to 11" type of issue.

      The problem is, as an earlier poster descibed, square waves. This is also known as "distortion". Distortion is the ultimate killer of *any* speaker, and it is NOT caused by too much power, but by a small amplifier (small in relation to the amount of power that a speaker can handle) driving a speaker that is too large for it. This happens in car audio *all the time* in the subwoofer world. "Hey look, I just bought a 1200 watt subwoofer and I'm gonna get cheap and drive it with a 40 watt amp!!!"

      The earlier poster was 100% correct. A speaker REQUIRES smooth sine-wave action to properly cool a voice coil. The in and out movement causes air to be moved through the voice coil. Even if the amplifier power far outpaces the speaker's capabilities, typically it's very difficult to cause a speaker failure due to an excursion event (pouring too much power to a speaker, effectively forcing it to move past it's physical limit, which is what too much power does). If you are experiencing excursion damage, you better get some hearing aids, because if you need it that loud you're deaf. Even from a small speaker, that would be extremely loud.

      Back to the Dell: I would suspect that Dell actually used a premium speaker that can handle lots of power, and the amplifier is way underpowered. In which case they are still responsible for the failure based on the lack of power in the amplifier, not the speakers.

      Just another viewpoint, and a different culprit to look at in your investigations.

      Good luck!!!

    69. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by countach74 · · Score: 1

      That poster was actually me (both the person who you disagree with and agree with). By turning the volume knob to 11, what I was trying to emphasize was that sending square waves/distortion to speakers is not necessarily enough in and of itself. It must be at a sufficient power level to generate enough heat to melt the voice coil shielding. And yes, you're right, it's very difficult to cause speaker failure from excursion. Tweeters are notoriously known for being sensitive to square waves, which are essentially what laptop speakers are: performing the sort of limiting that others in this thread have talked about will only perpetuate the square wave problem. It's nice to see someone who understands that. :)

      I agree with everything you've said; I think I simply miscommunicated earlier (I'm pretty sure you agree with me too, if my communication were more precise). And yes, back to Dell, I think there's a good chance that they underpowered the speakers (for some reason, this seems standard practice?). But there's also the possibility that the user sent square(ish) waves from VLC player, causing the distortion that we're talking about, which led to the cooling problems that we've discussed, ultimately resulting in the demise of the voice coil. We don't have enough information to know for sure. However, considering that it truly is in Dell's best interest to keep the peace and maintain customer satisfaction, I find it more likely that the end user is to blame, not Dell. But then, maybe Dell is a company that likes to dodge out of warranty claims? It's all guess work at this point.

    70. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by countach74 · · Score: 1

      The point is not keeping the speaker in a single place at any one time. I thought I made it clear that square waves is an extreme example; I apologize if I did not. The problem is that the speaker's movement is reduced. It does not need to cease movement entirely to prevent voice coil cooling. Sending distorted signals to speakers is a very common way to melt the voice coil.

    71. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a pram facie design defect if a specially crated sound wave can break the speaker.

    72. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just file a small claims court case in your disctrict for breach of warranty, they don't stand a chance, one because they are wrong, and two because judges almost always rule in the favor of joe or jane consumer vs. large company.

    73. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by doccus · · Score: 1

      Your solution may be that, "the voice coil should be designed to withstand this sort of [ab]use." But that is purely ideological and will likely lead to increased costs for manufacturers; it may also yield less powerful or inferior sound reproduction systems. I'm not sure what the consequences of such a mandate would be, but I'm almost certain neither of us would care for them.

      Given that websites can play arbitrary sounds in default configurations of all popular browsers, and have been able to do so for ages (albeit with means varying over time), this is a remote attack vector. If a website can blow out your speakers simply by playing a wave of a certain shape, it's an exploit and has to be fixed. And it seems evident that the proper fix should be on the hardware side of things, since there's too much software out there that would have to be fixed to close the hole.

      Wow. Interesting. And you are absolutely correct. Both of you...

    74. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by doccus · · Score: 1

      " I would be rather surprised if you can't blow any decent sound system by maxing out its volume knob and sending 200% (or whatever the maximum volume is) VLC music through it." Well.. you can. I have blown some mighty fine speakers that way

    75. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Read the original post. The poster was advocating deliberately damaging other parts of the laptop. That would probably be abuse.

    76. Re: Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has worked for one of Dell's competitors (Acer), we would have repaired or replaced said laptop. I was in another country from the OP so the trade laws may be different, but I highly doubt it.

    77. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by home-electro.com · · Score: 1

      You are on a wrong web-site. Slashdot is for nerds. You just posted such utter non-sense, you can't be a nerd. Go away.

    78. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      You sound like a very angry individual. I feel sorry for you.

      I meant buy something other than a Dell (or HP). Asus have a good record last time I checked which was a while ago.

      But in a more general sense don't reward bad companies with repeat business.

      In the free market society it is pretty much the only meaningful vote you get.

    79. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I think where you went wrong was in assuming a high quality sound system where design constraints actually force a trade-off between safety from burnout and quality.

      In the basic laptop built-in speaker scenario, high quality is already out the window. There's no need to keep the voice coil as light as possible or to avoid screwing up the high end with a low pass filter. With speakers that small and in such a tight enclosure bass is already dead, a protective capacitor won't do a lot of damage.

    80. Re:Force them to warrenty whole unit.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That's not the issue. Apple just like everyone else tends to make warranty repairs and replacement easy because it's efficient for them to do so.

      The problem is that at least in EU, apple thinks itself above the law, and as a result often tries very hard to get out of meeting its warranty obligations.

      Examples include trying to get out of servicing older iphones back in iphone 3 days because "water sensors were tripped" by condensation after taking it from the cold outside to the room temperature. Their warranty actually had the balls to have the clause "warranty void if you take the device to area with below freezing temperature" in Nordics. They got sued for it and had to change it.

      Then there's the whole "we won't provide legally mandated warranty because we want to sell additional warranty package and we'll advertise that our warranty is only half of the legal limit to expedite sales". They got sued for that as well and also lost.

      So yeah, if you get any modern large PC/phone company to actually honour the warranty, it's going to be nice and simple. It's going to be much harder if they try to deny the claim however, and apple is notorious for trying to deny warranty claims on illegal grounds in EU.

      P.S. hilarious modding on my previous post. Stating factual truth is trolling nowadays if the facts happen to be negative for apple.

  3. Small Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    IANAL, but your first path for court action is small claims, not a class action.

    1. Re:Small Claims by IQGQNAU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't need a lawyer for small claims, so not being one isn't a big problem. Filing the claim will also get the attention of some higher ups that the tech support tree will block you from.

    2. Re:Small Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > You don't need a lawyer for small claims, so not being one isn't a big problem.

      IANAL but I've been a claimant in multiple class actions, one of which was taken up to the supreme court where my name was attached to a finding, naturally (also we won).

      I don't think you understand what's being discussed. If you sue and fail in small claims does that invalidate a class action attempt? Depends on the class action and verdict (which may exclude anyone who made previous attempts). Since you don't grasp the situation, perhaps you should preface that you aren't a lawyer either.

    3. Re:Small Claims by mysidia · · Score: 2, Informative

      IANAL, but your first path for court action is small claims, not a class action.

      OK, but to make the true claim of Unfair competition, and ANTICOMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR against open source software (VLC product), in favor of Dell Partners' products, a small claims action is not going to fit the bill.

      This should be the American People VS Dell, for half a billion dollars.

    4. Re:Small Claims by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      He doesn't want to sue dell for unfairly treating VLC, he just wants his speaker repaired without obvious bullshit excuses.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Small Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also been involved in class action suits, and small claims does not invalidate a class action attempt. Small claims is the first step, in a legal process without involving lawyers between two parties where one is arguing that *insert body* is doing *whatever* in bad faith, and they only want restitution/repair as stated.

      A higher court as well always over-rides a lower body, and take the case law or common law into question on the issue when it becomes a class action. An exclusion comes at the will of the lawyers.

      It's also the first step in getting attention of the corporate lawyers that someone somewhere has fucked someone over, and usually they will settle out of court just to keep it out of court. On the positive side, if they should fail to show regardless then it's an automatic judgement against them for the *insert amount* which is always nice.

      So let's be realistic, the guy is getting fucked over, and wants repair/restitution based on the company acting in bad faith in the face of a warranty repair. Is it worthwhile to goto small claims and likely have the company show up and settle, or let it spend several years in the court and possibly get nowhere, or end up with a $200 voucher on a new dell $2500 box, while his laptop remains broken.

    6. Re:Small Claims by mysidia · · Score: 1

      He doesn't want to sue dell for unfairly treating VLC, he just wants his speaker repaired without obvious bullshit excuses.

      What court do you think will hear a suit over a $0.22 part? Dell just has to suggest a workaround "Recommend you plug in an external $5 speaker"

      The small claims filing fees would be greater than any potential award. Not to mention the time and energy it would take to file a claim and push it through court, only to have the case thrown out because a $50 in damages threshold was not met.

    7. Re:Small Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (IANAL, too... If you need actual official counsel on a legal matter, contact a licensed lawyer of your choice for that...)

      And merrily, consumers CAN file small claims suits under their State's respective Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

      It's a violation of the Implied Warranties of merchantability and suitability to use, given by UCC 2-314 and 2-315 to claim this. Speakers should not be damageable in a device of this nature by software by simply "overdriving" the speakers (The amps shouldn't be able to "overdrive" the speakers...ever...). There is no Court in the country that would consider Dell's position tenable as there's nobody in their right mind that would consider speakers that could be busted this way as being merchantable in the first place. Well...not legally, that is.

      This means either subpar speakers, or bad design on the part of Dell. Neither of which changes for the worse because of software installed- and shouldn't void the warranty if you install a program that might "overdrive" said speakers.

      To put this in perspective...

      If you're in Texas, for example, it is a violation of Section 17.46 of the Texas Business and Commerce code to:

      1) Represent that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality, or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if they are of another (17.46(b)(7))

      2) Represent that an agreement confers or involves rights, remedies, or obligations which it does not have or involve, or which are prohibited by law (17.46(b)(12) - You can't claim that a given piece of software voids the warranty unless you limit it UP FRONT, per Mangusson-Moss.)

      Both items meet the criteria specified in 17.50(a) under clauses (1)(A) and (1)(B), as well as (2). You can sue for economic and aggrivation/pain/suffering under 17.50 because of this. Because there is little other than obvious willful bad faith going on here, it gets interesting.

      What's your economic damages here? The cost of the laptop.

      If it is found to be a knowing act, the finder of facts are required by law to treble those damages.

      If it is found to be a knowing and willful act, the finder of facts are required by law to allow for/determine exemplary damages for aggrivation/pain&suffering/etc. and then combine that result with the economic damages and treble that .

      Under all contexts of bad faith, unknowing, knowing, or knowing and willful, they eat legal fees.

      On a thousand dollar laptop, you'll at least see $3K. If you've got proof of knowing and willful, the odds are good you'll see more. (Cap on small claims is $10k in Texas...)

      If they won't own their warranty here. It might be time to gather up the evidence (get it while you're doing this...it's crucial...) and take them to small claims court over all of it. However, be aware that they will probably send a lawyer to defend Dell in the suit...you might want to contemplate that result as well. If you've got your ducks in a row and don't lose your cool under those circumstances...you will probably win.

    8. Re:Small Claims by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      It's not a 20 cent part, it's a $500 laptop. Those are the damages. Dell is refusing to honor it's warranty and it's legal obligations on the entire product as a unit. The cost to replace the entire laptop is the damages. You can also add some extra costs for the overhead of the replacement.

      The cost of the non-user-serviceable part is not the damages. It's not even the total damages if you just want to fixate on the single failed part.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Small Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but if he wants class action status he's going to need a whole bunch of other people who can prove Dell did the same thing to them in order to be granted that status. Submitter should discuss any possible legal action with an attorney prior to filing anything, in any court.

    10. Re:Small Claims by dotgain · · Score: 2

      Dell just has to suggest a workaround "Recommend you plug in an external $5 speaker"

      That's hardly a reasonable workaround for a laptop computer.

    11. Re:Small Claims by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It's not a 20 cent part, it's a $500 laptop. Those are the damages. Dell is refusing to honor it's warranty and it's legal obligations on the entire product as a unit. The cost to replace the entire laptop is the damages.

      False. That is not how civil actions work. If you have a defect in a component of a warranted product, you are entitled to repair or replacement of only the component that is faulty, not a brand new full product.

      Your "loss" that you may be able to sue over is not the cost of the product --- it is the cost of remedying the defect.

      Since you can remedy the defect by plugging in a $5 external speaker, the possible claim in civil damages is no more than $5.

      Your argument is analogous to "My gas cap no longer affixes properly, therefore, Mercedes is due to replace the full value of my car"

    12. Re:Small Claims by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That's hardly a reasonable workaround for a laptop computer.

      There are inexpensive mini-speakers available for a laptop that can plug in using USB, which can be used with a laptop.

      The courts don't reimburse plaintiffs for "inconvenience" or for "disappointment" at having to attach an adapter to their laptop. If the workaround restores the product to the same functionality, then the Dell owner isn't going to be able to successfully sue Dell for a cost higher than that of the workaround.

      That's why I think the whole "anticompetitive behavior against VLC", that, and the higher dollar amount, is much more likely to get Dell's attention and make them address their support problems.

    13. Re:Small Claims by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      I'd say that being able to carry it around without attachments is primary functionality for a laptop.
      If Dell were to pay for the repair and carry out the repair by just sending an external USB speaker, would you say they've honored the warranty?
      If your car's windows spontaneously shattered during warranty, and you got a couple of helmets as a replacement, would you be okay with that?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    14. Re:Small Claims by N1AK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since you can remedy the defect by plugging in a $5 external speaker, the possible claim in civil damages is no more than $5.

      It's very unlikely that a court would decide it on that basis. Plugging in an external speaker isn't remedying the defect any more than Ford offering you a bus pass if your car breaks under warranty. Additionally, having someone other than dell replace the broken component would void your warranty which means it is a valid remedy (given that the warranty is a considerable part of the value of a device bought with one).

      As with anything it's worth consulting in person with someone who has relevant legal knowledge before doing anything involving a court.

      Your argument is analogous to "My gas cap no longer affixes properly, therefore, Mercedes is due to replace the full value of my car"

      And your response to the original issue was analogous to suggesting that an appropriate remedy would be buying some duct tape and taping it up after every fill so I wouldn't get up on too high a horse in your position.

    15. Re:Small Claims by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Additionally, having someone other than dell replace the broken component would void your warranty

      No.... a manufacturer cannot completely void your warranty, just because you used their product with a different component. They can only do so, if you caused the damage as a result of changing the component. Also, in general: a product's warranty is worth 10% of the value of a new unit, or less.

      And your response to the original issue was analogous to suggesting that an appropriate remedy would be buying some duct tape and taping it up after every fill

      No, but the most you are due is the cost of a replacement gas cap, and the replacement does not necessarily have to appear identical to the standard or original one.

      Duct tape wouldn't work as a repair, since there are actually safety issues with it.

    16. Re:Small Claims by Kalium70 · · Score: 1

      One small claims action might not get Dell's attention, but 5000 or 50,000 might.

  4. bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any decent hardware engineer would not put out electronics for mass production that can be destroyed by software. Hopefully an EE from Levono or HP will reverse engineer the circuit and determine if the is bad engineering and put all of the information on the web. This may be the only way to get Dell to put out quality (or at least not defective) products into the marketplace.

    1. Re:bad engineering? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure Dell doesn't design the actual circuits on their boards, they just pick a chipset and ship off the parts list to their builder in Shenzhen or wherever. I'm willing to bet there was a mismatch between what the speaker could handle and what the audio chipset puts out. Some engineer somewhere cut a corner and didn't test it, and of course at build time all they check for is that sound is produced (this is Dell, not Apple; they don't care if it's great audio quality, just that it works long enough to make it into the shipping box).

      That's all supposition on my part of course, but I'd put money on it being a mismatched speaker and chipset.

    2. Re:bad engineering? by inasity_rules · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, it is compromise engineering. Which is OK for a lot of consumer electronics. For example, most laptops won't have enough cooling to dissipate full load heat at maximum rated temperature. This isn't a design flaw, it is a compromise to allow the designer to get more peak performance out of the laptop(or more peak volume in a movie, for example). It is the same with, say gmail. Do you really think google could have supplied every user 1Gb of mail space at launch?

      I personally don't do this sort of engineering, but I can see the reasoning. And if you are trying to push high volumes out of your laptop speaker, you probably should be carrying external speakers. There are physical limitations to systems designed to be portable.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    3. Re:bad engineering? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      Dell has a long and well documented history of poor quality products and even worse customer service. It wouldn't surprise me to find out that they used the cheapest, shittiest speakers possible, and, due to their shit quality, cannot handle the power output of the laptop's amplifier when driven at high volume.

      Also, the article mentions setting VLC's volume to 200%. This was changed some time ago (version 2.0 I think) and VLC only goes up to a maximum of 125% now.

    4. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are "pretty sure" wrong –this is exactly the job of a company like Dell –to design the computer. They absolutely certainly do design the motherboard. They almost certainly start from an Intel reference design and adapt it, but they still definitely do do this stuff.

    5. Re:bad engineering? by xetovss · · Score: 1

      It is not so much an issue with Dell, but an issue with the computer industry in general. On a previous notebook computer I used as my main notebook, a Thinkpad T21, it had a single speaker and at maximum volume it could be heard clearly throughout the house (granted while not a booming sound from true stereo speakers good enough for a notebook computer so I could keep hearing it as I moved about the house) and to this day sounds good with minimal distortion, however with a newer notebook, a Thinkpad T500, its speakers were starting to crackle after barely a year of usage. However the speakers that most computer manufactures are using nowadays are a lot cheaper so they limit the power that goes to them thereby limiting the volume and in some cases that can make watching a movie on the computer impossible without headphones, external speakers, or boosting the volume through EQ adjustments or the volume boost function of VLC.

      This issue is not limited to Dell and IBM/Lenovo but is true for many manufactures computers, especially in notebooks without a premium audio option which include beefier speakers and sometimes an additional woofer speaker for better low range. The real fix would be to use a higher quality speaker that can take a little more power (I mean we are only talking about a few watts of power so how hard can it be). Therein lies the problem, with notebook computers being commodity products these days and the majority of buyers looking for the best price, the manufactures skimp on quality. Because of said skimping on quality leads people to use bandaid fixes which in turn exacerbates the issue and leads the already prematurely prone to failure speakers to fail even more prematurely.

    6. Re:bad engineering? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Why would they?
      Nobody buys a Dell machine for the quality, so why bother trying to provide better quality than the cheapest possible?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:bad engineering? by andydread · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the miriad of engineers that put out monitors for mass production that got destroyed by people having the wrong modelines in the xfree86.conf files back in the day.

    8. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Max displayed volume on the control interface shows 125%, but if you ctrl-up arrow you can achieve 200%. In previous versions, VLC used to go to 400%.

      Still, the actual output of VLC can be a maximum of 0dBFS, as can any audio playback application. Anything above that will just be clipped and distorted. It is unlikely any laptop amp+speaker system can withstand a full bandwidth/full amplitude assault with the external volume cranked up.

      In short, VLC is not the problem here. It is the idiot user expecting to be able to turn everything up to 11 and not damage something on a shitty Dell laptop.

    9. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some engineer somewhere cut a corner and didn't test it

      Or the factory that assembled the laptop bought in speakers from the cheapest vendor that claimed that their speakers fulfilled the engineers specification.

      Cheaping out on the manufacturing is how they compete and how they make profit.

    10. Re:bad engineering? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      In short, VLC is not the problem here. It is the idiot user expecting to be able to turn everything up to 11 and not damage something on a shitty Dell laptop.

      If I buy an electronic item and use it in accordance with the instructions, then I expect it to work in line with my expectations.

      Does this make me an idiot user?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    11. Re:bad engineering? by GNious · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having literally seen a brick received in a Dell laptop box, instead of the purchased laptop, I'm thinking you're expecting too much of Dell's Q/A process.

      (note: the 3 other boxes contained actual laptops.)

    12. Re:bad engineering? by vivian · · Score: 2

      No, the problem is with the design.
      A recording of a triangle wave or square wave from a synthesizer at max volume would cause it the same problems. If the speaker really is so crappy as to not be able to handle these transients, all they need to do is add a small 20 cent capacitor to filter out the very high frequency components in parallel with the signal somewhere - either at the output or input. That will reduce the sound quality, but then it's a laptop speaker so sound quality already sucks pretty hard, and convenience and portability is obviously the listeners priority rather than sound fidelity.

    13. Re:bad engineering? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think you may have a mistaken impression of corporate structures. I don't think many corporations would allow electrical engineers have that kind of control unless said electrical engineer started the company.

      I also doubt Lenovo or HP engineers would be in a position to point fingers, their consumer PCs aren't very good either, criticizing competition's build quality won't do them any favors when it invites reciprocation.

      Clipping waveforms is a problem that can also ruin expensive speakers too.

    14. Re:bad engineering? by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can you cite references for this? I thought Dell in particular pawned off this type of work to their system builders in China. Dell still designs the look and feel of their machines and decides which parts go in, but the actual circuit board design is done further down the chain. At least, that's what I've always understood. Here's my source reference, btw:

      http://www.xoticpc.com/laptop-...

    15. Re:bad engineering? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Do you really think google could have supplied every user 1Gb of mail space at launch?

      Sure, why not? Hard drive space seems to have cost around 1$/GB in 2004 when GMail was launched. Add the invitation-only registration for several years and it's easy enough to keep costs under control.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    16. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell has contracted out the system board designs companies in China like Compal. Dell does basic designs and mockups but leaves the details to specialty companies.

      Intel doesn't have "reference design" laptop motherboards - there is very little about laptops that are standard to base a design off of.

    17. Re:bad engineering? by mc6809e · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I personally don't do this sort of engineering, but I can see the reasoning. And if you are trying to push high volumes out of your laptop speaker, you probably should be carrying external speakers. There are physical limitations to systems designed to be portable.

      The trouble is that the audio chipset hardware is by design meant to output arbitrary waveforms, including squarewaves, which is what VLC produces in the most extreme form of clipping.

      A wave file can hold the very same signal.

      Neither the user nor software is responsible for trying to figure out what waveforms are a problem on a system where the built in amp can destroy the built in speaker. It's the responsibility of the maker to limit the output of their own amp so that it doesn't cause damage. They put the amp in there in the first place. There's nothing about putting in a proper amp that in any way would affect portability.

    18. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposition, or did you read TFA? The article does indeed confirm that the amplifier produced more power than the speakers were rated for.

    19. Re:bad engineering? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      If your doing the sort of "compromise engineering" that results in the product self-destructing, then part of your "compromise" is the legal obligation to pay the warranty cost of repairing/replacing/refunding that product when it does self-destruct.

      And if you are trying to push high volumes out of your laptop speaker, you probably should be carrying external speakers.

      If I set the volume to full and I'm not satisfied with the sound level I get, sure, I'll go get external speakers. But using the laptop at full volume should never result in permanent damage. It should never self destruct just because I play a music file that happens to contain clipping.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    20. Re:bad engineering? by dk20 · · Score: 0

      "this is Dell, not Apple" - you sure you are not just holding it wrong?

    21. Re:bad engineering? by sjwt · · Score: 1

      If I buy an electronic item and use it in accordance with the instructions, then I expect it to work in line with my expectations.

      Does this make me an idiot user?

      Is this in reference to buying a Dell? If so the question maybe rhetorical.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    22. Re:bad engineering? by TooTechy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but PC manufacturers have been putting out hardware that can be damaged by software for years. CPU overheating caused by bad drivers is one area where this appears time and again.

      However, there is no reason that the PC, running a supported OS, should allow an application to damage the hardware in any way. That is either bad OS design or bad hardware design or both.

    23. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your expectations are unreasonable or beyond the specs of the equipment then yes; it does make you an idiot user.

    24. Re:bad engineering? by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      In short, VLC is not the problem here. It is the idiot user expecting to be able to turn everything up to 11 and not damage something on a shitty Dell laptop.

      The products I design have to work in the real world, regardless of the actions taken by the "nut behind the wheel". Why is a faulty Dell design the users' fault?

    25. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an alienware laptop. I had the speakers replaced twice under warranty and they are _again_ producing a tearing sound. It appears that there's something with how Dell handles putting speakers in their laptops that keeps letting them fail. I finally gave up on this speaker replacement business and bought some cheap laptop speakers instead which seem to be working fine...

    26. Re:bad engineering? by mtpaley · · Score: 2

      "literally seen a brick received in a Dell laptop box"? Seriously?

    27. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... Do you work for Dell? Many of those laptops are designed to Dell's specifications by Quanta and the like. Dell pretty much doesn't design squat on the consumer products side of things from when last I had interactions (as in interviewing for a job there...) with the company's people.

    28. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which means it's defective out of box under the understandings given by the UCC. Either replace the speakers with something that WON'T die from the amp's output, replace the whole laptop with one that does work like it's supposed to that is as-good or better, or refund the entire purchase price of the laptop in question at the time it was purchased from Dell or one of it's representatives.

      That's what's required of Dell from the UCC.

      Failing to do that, they're afoul of a lot of differing jurisdiction's deceptive trade practices acts.

    29. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having literally seen a brick received in a Dell laptop box, instead of the purchased laptop, I'm thinking you're expecting too much of Dell's Q/A process.

      (note: the 3 other boxes contained actual laptops.)

      I call Bullshit. Pictures or didn't happen.

    30. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, VLC is not the problem here. It is the idiot user expecting to be able to turn everything up to 11 and not damage something on a shitty Dell laptop.

      The products I design have to work in the real world, regardless of the actions taken by the "nut behind the wheel". Why is a faulty Dell design the users' fault?

      Without knowing if the fault lies in the design or not, I can still address this question. This is a Consumer-Grade piece of equipment. This means you should not expect to be able to run the system at the upper bounds of it's specs for extended periods of time.
      Again, I'm not defending Dell... or even attacking the user. But I really DO question why he felt the need to max out the volume on his speakers in the first place. If you're THAT hard of hearing you should probably just go get a pair of headphones, or use an external speaker. Or a hearing aid.

    31. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having literally seen a brick received in a Dell laptop box, instead of the purchased laptop, I'm thinking you're expecting too much of Dell's Q/A process.

      (note: the 3 other boxes contained actual laptops.)

      Echos of MiniScribe still resounding, I think.

    32. Re:bad engineering? by sjames · · Score: 1

      This is beyond a compromise though. In your example, the laptop run at full load will throttle harmlessly rather than burning out. In the gmail case, they would either scramble to put more disks online as they approached 100%, suspend new signups, or announce that for better service quotas were increased from 1GB to 500MB. They would not likely have just deleted all email.

    33. Re:bad engineering? by mattr · · Score: 1

      It might happen though not as likely. I saw a tv news show a couple weeks ago showing phone chargers being sold on the street in China that were filled with packets of sand. The more expensive ones had a little less sand. The Chinese shopkeeper (if you call squatting on a bridge a shop) had no qualms. "Your phone charged some amount so you should be happy." Dell apparently shares some heredity with these shop owners on the bridge.

    34. Re:bad engineering? by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the difference between peak and average volume. A solution which limited you from pushing peak all the time would decrease the overall quality of the product.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    35. Re:bad engineering? by GNious · · Score: 1

      I'd see if I can dig out the picture, but I'd observe that you're an anonymous coward, so making it hard to put up picture.

      Meanwhile, yes, it DID happen.

    36. Re:bad engineering? by GNious · · Score: 1

      It was 7 years ago, while I was visiting an American client's factory in an African country (company of 120K+ employees) - they had, at the time, Dell as a significant (but not exclusive) contractor for PCs, Laptops and servers. I do not know where the laptops were sent from, but they were ordered directly from Dell via the company's contract with Dell.
      (i.e., it may have been an intermediary, that "swapped things around", but any such agent would have been contracted by Dell and thus still Dell's responsibility).

    37. Re:bad engineering? by GNious · · Score: 1

      yes - box was opened, inside was a building-brick. The other boxes were checked, contained actual laptops.
      Was a fun joke, at least for those of us that didn't have to call up the Dell Account Manager and explain it.

    38. Re:bad engineering? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the difference between peak and average volume. A solution which limited you from pushing peak all the time would decrease the overall quality of the product.

      Not true -- it would improve the audio quality, because it would eliminate the higher order noise partials, and unmask the natural harmonics in the signal. There would be a loss of low-end, but the perceived audio would be clearer and higher fidelity.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    39. Re:bad engineering? by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      The other possibility is that somebody made the determination that substituting a cheaper speaker lets the shave a little off the cost of the laptop. Profit margins in the laptop business are razor thin now. I fully expect that if they can squeeze another nickle in profit by cutting the corner they'll do it.

      I am curious how wide spread this trend of trying to deny warranty coverage based on software load is? I know a friend of mine made inquires about getting Win7 for a laptop he bought with Win8 on it. He was told by the support department of the manufacturer that if he did that it would void his warranty and they wouldn't cover any of the hardware. I thought that was the strangest thing I had ever heard but now I am starting to wonder based upon this. In his case my suggestion was get another hard drive and put whatever you want on it and then if you need warranty service put the original hard drive with their image back in. Followed by don't buy that brand again.

    40. Re:bad engineering? by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      I miss when VLC went to 400%

    41. Re:bad engineering? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the difference between peak and average volume.

      I certainly understand peak and average.

      A solution which limited you from pushing peak all the time would decrease the overall quality of the product.

      It has a low-wattage speaker mismatched with a high-wattage driver circuit. The driver circuit overpowers and damages the speaker when you play a high-average-amplitude sound file at full volume.

      It's like a flashlight with low and high settings, where the high setting sends 6 volts to a 3 volt lightbulb. It will be extra bright for maybe two seconds while it destroys the lightbulb. Obviously if your max power output is 6 volts then you need to pair it with a 6 volt bulb.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    42. Re:bad engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a Hercules Graphics Card, you had to set the registers in a certain order with certain values otherwise you had a dead monitor on your hands. If you were lucky, the monitor had a fuse. I replaced fuses several times when I were writing an image editor that used a HGC for the menus and a SVGA card for the image. This was done on a PC-XT clone.

      I had upgraded to multi synch monitors when I started to dabble with Xfree86.

    43. Re:bad engineering? by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      And do you understand the physical characteristics of a high wattage speaker? Size? Weight? and so on? Lots of things have multiple ratings for multiple scenarios. For example, I can run an a transformer at 40MVA average, but peak at 60MVA without additional cooling. This allows me to use a smaller, lighter transformer than if I had specified a 60MVA continuous rating. If I have correct protection circuitry, the system will function just fine, and in fact is more efficient, since I can get away with passive cooling on 40MVA, where at 60MVA in a similar form factor, I might be unable to.

      The only thing I can see here is that Dell did not provide the speaker/driver specifications, although the much publicized "we don't support VLC" is sort of a clue. They attempted software protection, by trying to specify what software was supported - this is not an ideal approach, but it isn't nonsensical either.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    44. Re:bad engineering? by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      I am not a sound engineer, so I can't refute that. I think in terms of the energy the speaker can withstand. I do think though if I was listening to music and the audio system suddenly "throttled" the volume, it would be a fairly jarring experience, but there may be other ways to "throttle"...

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    45. Re:bad engineering? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The point is that you don't have to throttle the volume -- you can just block the frequencies that cause the problem, and these frequencies are either inaudible or noise. Besides, others on this thread have identified the components and the Dell laptop is defective by design, having speakers that are underrated for the output of the the sound board.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    46. Re:bad engineering? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I can run an a transformer at 40MVA average, but peak at 60MVA without additional cooling....
      If I have correct protection circuitry, the system will function just fine

      Except Dell connected mis-matched components without protection circuity. They delivered a product that self-destructs under normal operation in some circumstances, and they're trying to refuse warranty repairs.

      "we don't support VLC"

      Again, this really has nothing to do with VLC. Playing some (relatively rare) sound files causes speaker damage. VLC merely make it more common to run into this design flaw because VLC can make common sound files look like the less common sound files which trigger the problem.

      A VCR is defective if it self-destructs when you play an ordinary videocassette of a movie set in a field of uncommonly colorful flowers. Same thing.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    47. Re:bad engineering? by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      You clearly have never read Douglas R. Hofstadter's Godel Escher and Bach. Specifically the section on the "unbreakable" record player. But, yes, it may be possible to build such a device, though it is questionable if it could still be called a record player. But I wax philosophical now, and yes, Dell should have taken steps to prevent a normally unlikely situation.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    48. Re:bad engineering? by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      If we subscribe to the idea that there are no unbreakable record players (see my reply to sibling poster), then all sound systems are "defective by design." I do agree Dell should have taken greater steps to prevent this situation, but I don't see it as the massive mistake others do. Design of a real (not philosophically questionable ideal) involves a lot of compromise. Welcome to the real world. Try the veal, it is very good.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
  5. Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    So to keep,a long story short, I had to sue Dell over a overheating Alienware M11x GAMING notebook.

    I had a friendly but non helpful support case with Dell and a short also friendly but also non helpful discussion afterwards. Then I sued.

    I won.

    1. Re:Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But did you really win? If you want to bring a small case against a large company, you're going to end up paying more in legal fees and time than it is worth.

    2. Re:Well, I sued... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      Small claims court is $25 (where I'm at) and you go without a lawyer. $25 is the cost

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're paying legal fees in small claims, you're doing it wrong.

      As for time, if you put a monetary value on time other than when working for an employer on an hourly basis, you're doing it absolutely wrong.

    4. Re:Well, I sued... by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      If you have the time, making a large company do the right thing is excellent entertainment, especially these days.

    5. Re:Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to keep,a long story short, I had to sue Dell over a overheating Alienware M11x GAMING notebook.

      I had a friendly but non helpful support case with Dell and a short also friendly but also non helpful discussion afterwards. Then I sued.

      I won.

      This sounds like a familiar old tactic:
      1) On every warranty claim blame the customer...
      2) ....eventually 90% of them will give up and take the loss.
      3) Profit.

    6. Re:Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go without a lawyer not for the cost saving but because a Lawyer is bound by the LAWS OF EVIDENCE as he is on the bar.

      You however, are NOT bound by bar laws of evidence, any lawyer worth his salt (soliciter in the UK) will tell you to defend yourself in the small claims courts as you can get awaay with anything the lawyer cannot as he is constrained by laws of evidence and bar rules. YOU, however, can get away with murder.

    7. Re:Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, I'm pretty sure you must represent yourself in small claims court.

    8. Re:Well, I sued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the real reason you don't use a lawyer in small claims is that they're generally not allowed to represent you in small claims cases in most places.

  6. Two options by synaptik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Option The First:
    1. Buy Dell Laptop
    2. Do first-use OS initialization, power down, remove HDD, store away in a safe place
    3. Add new harddrive, install OS of choice
    4. If at any time you have warranty service needs, swap original HDD back in

    Option The Second:
    1. Don't buy Dell
    .

    --
    HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Two options by Wubble · · Score: 1

      Option "The Second" for me. Dell was on my short list for my next computer purchase; not any more if their technical support is run by lawyers rather than technicians.

    2. Re:Two options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add HP to the list.

    3. Re: Two options by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      My bet is that, like anything else these days, it's run by some people with "business" or "economics" in their title.

    4. Re:Two options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second option is the one I will go with.

    5. Re:Two options by Muros · · Score: 1

      Option 1 should be used in some form for any hardware repair job. Remove disk, replace with disk containing freshly installed virgin OS. Beside the frustration of having to deal with idiots telling you that software that isn't specifically allowed automatically invalidates the warranty (and I have been told this by HP Proliant server support staff regarding Redhat, a flavour of linux that they readily supply support for on their website), who knows who is going to end up looking at your hard drive? I'd rather not have the hard drive of a machine I use for internet banking in the hands of someone I don't know. Plus, when they are finished with it, they WILL wipe the drive and install a fresh OS. If yo have anything you want to keep, take the drive out.

    6. Re:Two options by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I buy from ZAReason. There are other vendors, but for me it's local. I've never had a problem with "You shouldn't have installed that OS!". Of course, it comes with Linux installed, and the other OSes I've installed have just been other versions/distros of Linux. Don't know what they'd say if I installed BSD.

      Pogo sells systems with MSWind, Linux, or both installed. To me that's not benefit, besides, they're farther away.

      System76 sells laptops with Linux installed.

      Why were you dealing with Dell again?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:Two options by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Or clone the hard drive to an image and leave that somewhere so you don't need to muck about inside a laptop designed for technicians with very tiny hands and a fetish for 10 screws of varying lengths holding each component in.

    8. Re:Two options by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      My supervisor used to burn himself DVDs of peoples' home porn.

    9. Re:Two options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Option The First:

      1. Buy Dell Laptop

      2. Do first-use OS initialization, power down, remove HDD, store away in a safe place

      3. Add new harddrive, install OS of choice

      4. If at any time you have warranty service needs, swap original HDD back in

      Option The Second:

      1. Don't buy Dell .

      Dell has serious financial problems so future is dim for them. It is best if you have a set of screwdrivers for the stuff you own.

  7. do not buy dell .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a problem with a dell computer in the past, and I would never get any other never again

    1. Re:do not buy dell .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah

  8. Here's some options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) for class action you would need other people who had the same problem.

    2) Go see a lawyer and bring the warranty service contract. You can take them to small claims court and possibly get a judgement simply because they aren't likely to show. Just keep track of your lawyer's billing rates, and the filing fees for small claims because you're going to need that info when comparing your time, effort and money against option #4 I list below.

    3) Build a time machine and then go back in time and tell yourself to return the laptop for warranty service, and when they ask what's wrong, say "the speaker quit working, I have no idea why"

    4) Or the real thing you can do hit a pillow and get the anger out. Then grumble about Dell to your friends and let them pat you on the shoulder. Then buy a pair of external speakers that aren't shitty, and don't stop worrying about small potatoes. Really man, it sucks to get screwed on a fine line of a warranty issue.. we've all been there. Let it go.

    1. Re:Here's some options... by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      Or how about just buy some replacement speakers and install them? They're $8 on ebay, and most people on Slashdot have the skills to do so. Hell, there's tons of youtube tutorials on how to fix your computer.

      If you want to stick it to Dell (because they ARE responsible), then by all means, take them to small claims court. But instead of building a time machine, hiring a lawyer, or getting all angry, mad, and ruining your day (if you're not going to sue)... just pay the $8 and get replacement speakers on ebay, or use external desktop speakers.... and install the BIOS update that prevents the issue in the future.

      http://www.dell.com/support/tr...

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    2. Re:Here's some options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Why? If you have warranty, you have warranty. Period, end of the discussion. Make em take care of it.

      Giving Dell a blackeye when they have had their eyes swollen shut for the past 10 years isn't going to do anything.

      Hit them where it hurts, their empty nutsack (wallet). Blast em in the public - like slashdot and on facebook - hell start a change.org petition to force michael dell to cover all parts under warranty.

    3. Re:Here's some options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet
      3) Build a time machine and then go back in time and tell yourself not to buy Dell.

  9. It happened to me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so i was watching INCEPTION with all that awesome sounds when movie started, i had no headphones, and guess what on speaker was blown out. Called dell, guy came to office replace the speaker.

    I'm not sure what makes them not to do so in your case.

  10. Dial the Volume up to 11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *unless you are using a Dell(TM)-branded speaker

  11. physcial damage by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know what VLC player is, but any laptop that allows its speakers to be damage by software has a design flaw. Why is it that companies will try their damnedest to screw their customers over until publicly shamed with a bad-pr article like this?

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must live under a rock.

    2. Re:physcial damage by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Agreed. A computer should be able to perform any sequence of instructions the user can come up with. Otherwise it is not functioning as advertised.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    3. Re:physcial damage by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what VLC player is

      Well, this is the Internet. You could easily find out.

    4. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the links in the article. There are some good explanations. What VLC is doing is boosting the signal then clipping...a lot. This produces a much higher average amplitude damaging speakers primarily through heat damage. The phenomenon is not unique to Dell or VLC.

    5. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rule of thumb is that without a robotic arm to smash itself with, no software can damage hardware.
      Now it is true that there have been some RARE exceptions to this due to incompetent engineering, but that is a design flaw, and certainly not the users fault.
      (By RARE, I mean that in the past 3-4 decades of computing, I'm only aware of 3 such issues that were real, and I used to deal with that kind of stuff for a living.)
      It's kind of like having a car that loses all electricals if you press the brake all the way down. The designer F'd up, not the user.

      The company is just trying to weasel out of the warranty and assumes the user will just bend over and take it.
      I've seen companies blame software for hardware issues a LOT. To force them to do what's right, we've even had to conference call (us, user, manufacterer) together and point out exactly what is wrong with the hardware after the influence of software has been eliminated, and even then they still balked. Which was kind of funny as more often than not we were using techniques and knowledges their 'technical support personnel' didn't even comprehend despite them being basic hardware troubleshooting procedures. In short, most of them were list monkeys that had no idea what they were actually doing, they just followed the checklist.

      This user might not have to resort to a lawsuit, but it may be best. Also, if he's said anything about a lawsuit to the company, it's about 99% probably he's no longer dealing with support, but rather with someone from legal. Companies are really picky about that, so don't throw out the lawyer threat unless you've already talked to one of your own.

    6. Re:physcial damage by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Agreed. A computer should be able to perform any sequence of instructions the user can come up with.

      What about the sequences of instructions that relate to the system BIOS or add-in card/peripheral components' EEPROM or flash ROM, and allow you to zero it, or flash it with bits of your choice?

    7. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netherside rock dwellers are the wisest of all slashdot posters. This guy knows.

    8. Re:physcial damage by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2

      Playing a youtube video with some heavily compressed sound could do the same thing.

    9. Re:physcial damage by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      That particular sequence of instructions should zero the EEPROM of flash ROM or flash it with bits of my choice.
      It should not, however, blow up the speaker or do anything else it wasn't supposed to be able to do.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    10. Re:physcial damage by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually almost any speaker can be damaged by overdriving it for long periods of time. Laptops are particularly vulnerable because they have small speakers trying to make a lot of noise.

      Having said that my money would be on Dell just trying to get out of the warranty.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can and will be protected with a jumper. The hardware wont be damaged in either case. It just need more sophisticated equip to reenable.

    12. Re:physcial damage by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Agreed. A computer should be able to perform any sequence of instructions the user can come up with. Otherwise it is not functioning as advertised.

      Performing a sequence of instructions is an easily quantifiable problem. Playing sound through speakers includes a physical, analog stage and it's much harder to predict all the corner cases. Speakers don't like playing clipped signal at high volumes. Speakers also don't like DC voltage (you could also craft an audio signal like that on a PC too). And so on.

    13. Re:physcial damage by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      This is true.

    14. Re: physcial damage by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      They're advertised as "Windows Notebooks". They should be able to boot Windows of the particular version mentioned on the activation code sticker. Anything else - not their problem. Sad but true.

    15. Re: physcial damage by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      Most contemporary CD's are mastered like that. Yet I haven't damaged any speakers or headphones while listening to such.

    16. Re:physcial damage by TwoBit · · Score: 1

      True, and consider that the hard drive too will be damaged by driving it for long periods of time. The situation seems to be a little more gray than simply "any broken speaker is Dell's fault."

    17. Re:physcial damage by Arker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Actually almost any speaker can be damaged by overdriving it for long periods of time. "

      Which is why when you design a system with an integrated audio system (like, say, a laptop) you have to match the components. The last stage of amplification should never send a signal to the speakers that they cant handle, regardless of input.

      This sounds to me like a design defect.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    18. Re:physcial damage by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Right. Also, it shouldn't start any program that won't eventually finish.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    19. Re:physcial damage by _merlin · · Score: 4, Informative

      It isn't practical. Speakers can handle far more of a reasonable signal than a horribly clipped almost square wave. While a "normal" audio signal will be converted to transducer movement, a square wave will end up being dissipated primarily as heat in the driver coil. Speakers can handle normal overload far better than they can handle severe clipping. It's easier to destroy a 500W speaker with a 30W amp driven to clipping than with a 1000W amp driven to make the peaks push your threshold of pain.

    20. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should the user be restricted from doing those things? Is the nanny mentality so ingrained into people today?

    21. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, then explain why we need the LP0 on Fire code...

    22. Re:physcial damage by Baldorcete · · Score: 1

      DC must be filtered out before the first amplification stage. A simple capacitor in series does this, and there is no way software could baypass it. Also, speakers should have a safety margin over the maximum output of the amplifier.

    23. Re:physcial damage by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      The fact of the matter is that Dell used an amplifier capable of blowing out the speakers, and then blamed the user.

      The maximum peak and sustained output of an amplifier is a solved problem, and any amplifier that sounds better than a 1960s telephone has been modeled sufficiently to quantify it.

      If VLC increasing the recording volume is not allowed under warranty, I imagine screaming into the microphone and playing it back is also not allowed? How watching the PBS website videos with their unbelievably loud advertisements?

      Frankly, guaranteeing you don't have a mismatched amplifier/speaker setup is much easier than guaranteeing that any set of instructions/interrupts will not overload your power supply or some chip somewhere without a temperature sensor.

    24. Re:physcial damage by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Thanks for beating me to this post.. My ever wavering faith in the technical knowledge of /. is slightly restored.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    25. Re:physcial damage by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Those are good points indeed.

    26. Re:physcial damage by Arker · · Score: 1

      In this case it appears they have paired 6w speakers with a soundcard that pushes 10w output. Someone probably tested it *very* minimally and said "it works, ship it."

      Well yeah, that setup will work, most of the time. And clearly it's the cheapest option in the short run. But in the long run shoddy design like that does have a cost - increased returns, increased warranty claims.

      You can wave your hands about waveforms and clipping all you want, the fact is that properly made equipment doesnt do this. I have pushed square waves through ridiculous amplification setups and thence to my speakers many, many times without damaging anything.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    27. Re: physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur!

    28. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THE SOFTWARE DIDN'T DAMAGE THE SPEAKERS. Why are you believing that line? This was obviously just some schmuck in India coming up with a random excuse about why he shouldn't have to honor the warranty. The speaker has nothing to do with VLC or software. NOTHING.

    29. Re:physcial damage by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Note that I'm not saying Dell is justified in making this claim, I'm merely stating that you can fuck up pretty much any audio system with the right signal. You can't easily design a system that prevents this. Even high end expensive hifi systems will happily produce a signal that can wreck speakers under extreme circumstances, and it certainly isn't a design fault.

      In Dell's case it probably is a design fault, in that they went a bit too close to the limit and made their speakers easily breakable. It's a nonsense excuse, and they owe this guy a fix. I'm just saying that you can break speakers even in a well designed system, if you try hard enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:physcial damage by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's a goal, not necessarily an achieved state. E.g., during the 1990's one needed to be careful while configuring ones monitor lest one cause the system to damage it. By the late 1990's there were automated tools to set the parameters, and I can't remember the last time I've seen the warning "Be careful with this setting as you may damage your hardware.", but it's been there in the not-so-distant past. (Would it actually have damaged my monitor? I was never experimental enough to investigate.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    31. Re:physcial damage by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Yep, clipping is much worse than normal overload. And polyfuses are dirt cheap and protect a speaker against both.

      Blaming software for a problem that can be solved through sensible engineering design is foolish, and not worth the bad PR.

    32. Re:physcial damage by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      By the late 1990's there were automated tools to set the parameters

      And the monitor manufacturers added protection circuits to detect out of range sync signals and shut the monitor down.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    33. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why "matched" amp/speaker sets are crap. You always should over-size the amp for the speaker load. That way, you only need to turn the amp up to a moderate output to get the requisite amount of "loud". Overdriving the amp is far more damaging, even to the speakers. With an overpowered system, it's not damaging at all until your amp output fully exceeds the load being driven, which is then obviously catastropic. Your ears will never let you get there unless you're either deaf or stupid. And I feel no pity for the stupid.

    34. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      Clipped signals have been the death of a lot of tweeters. Far more speakers have been killed by square waves coming from underpowered amps than excessive power.

      On the other hand, it's kind of pathetic that a laptop is susceptible to this.. the power level is just so low. They must be incredibly flimsy..

    35. Re:physcial damage by sjames · · Score: 1

      It should perform as designed. No hardware burned out, though you may need a flash programmer to boot it again.

    36. Re:physcial damage by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's what analog filters are for. Also, since the signal is generated by a DtoA, you absolutely can design it so the amp can't be overdriven.

    37. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In most loudspeakers, most of the input power is dissipated as heat in the coil and magnet. (From Wikipedia: "Most loudspeakers are inefficient transducers; only about 1% of the electrical energy sent by an amplifier to a typical home loudspeaker is converted to acoustic energy. The remainder is converted to heat, mostly in the voice coil and magnet assembly.")

      So if you put in a sine wave, almost all of that will be dissipated as heat. If you put in a square wave, you have about twice as much power going in, and about twice as much heat being dissipated. It's impossible to destroy a 500W speaker with heat from a 30W amp. (It may be possible to produce a signal that destroys it mechanically, though. Not sure how much power that would need.)

    38. Re:physcial damage by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      It isn't practical. Speakers can handle far more of a reasonable signal than a horribly clipped almost square wave. While a "normal" audio signal will be converted to transducer movement, a square wave will end up being dissipated primarily as heat in the driver coil. Speakers can handle normal overload far better than they can handle severe clipping. It's easier to destroy a 500W speaker with a 30W amp driven to clipping than with a 1000W amp driven to make the peaks push your threshold of pain.

      Another way to say this might be that it's not power that kills speakers, it's distortion...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    39. Re: physcial damage by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      They're advertised as "Windows Notebooks". They should be able to boot Windows of the particular version mentioned on the activation code sticker. Anything else - not their problem. Sad but true.

      They should also be able to run programs using standard Windows APIs to perform functions required by the user, without damaging anything.
      VLC uses standard Windows APIs to play sound. If this damages the hardware, then it's Dell's problem.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    40. Re:physcial damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't practical.

      Oookay.

      Speakers can handle far more of a reasonable signal than a horribly clipped almost square wave.

      Correct for multi-way speakers. Otherwise wrong.

      While a "normal" audio signal will be converted to transducer movement, a square wave will end up being dissipated primarily as heat in the driver coil.

      Wrong.

      Speakers can handle normal overload far better than they can handle severe clipping.

      Half-right. See explanation below.

      It's easier to destroy a 500W speaker with a 30W amp driven to clipping than with a 1000W amp driven to make the peaks push your threshold of pain.

      Nope.

      Clipping amps kill *tweeters* (and even midranges in 3-way speakers if pushed hard enough).
      But... you don't need clipping to do that.
      Take a 300W RMS rated multi-way speaker.
      Drive it with a perfectly clean 30W 10kHz sinewave.
      Tweeter goes up in smoke.
      Reason: Music generally has a power density over frequency that falls off at roughly 10dB/decade, and speakers are designed making use of that. So in a classic 300/3000Hz crossover 3-way, the midrange is deisgned to handle about 1/10th the power of the woofer, and the tweeter about 1/100th.
      Having made that clear... now look at the power distribution of the harmonics of a square wave.
      Hint: it's not a 10dB/decade dropoff.
      Add 1+1 ... and you figured out the real reason why a heavily distorting 30W amp can kill a tweeter in a properly designed 300W speaker.

      Other than that, there's one other common way to kill speakers. Excessive mechanical excursion. Not a problem for anything with a high-pass filter (aka tweeter/midrange), but (near-)subsonic content below the Helmholtz frequency has killed many a woofer or sub in ported enclosures.

  12. Dell is a four letter word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough said.

    1. Re:Dell is a four letter word. by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Enough Said.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  13. They got nothing... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    It's their product and no proof you victimized it, unless using it at all isn't allowed. Escalate (with more noise) up the food chain, try another dealer, etc. until they realize keeping a customer happy is more valuable than a 22.1 cent speaker and the time to swap it/them out would ever be.

  14. A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's the beauty of a digital signal: You simply can't put in a stronger signal than the bits allow. Yes, a "clipped" signal has high energy harmonics, but the same harmonics could be encoded right in the audio source signal without additional player amplification. For example, using mp3gain to set a high gain on any MP3 file will cause the decoder to happily produce a clipped time domain signal. Even Windows Media Player will play it clipped. Designing an audio system such that it can't handle any signal you could put in a WAV file is just idiotic. Such penny-pinching certainly isn't the user's fault and would not void legally mandated warranties. Dell can of course exclude anything they like from a voluntary warranty, if they make it clear upfront what is excluded.

  15. CALL A LAWYER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call a lawyer. That is all. Do not post another word. Do not speak publicly about it. Just pick up your phone, take your attorney's card out of your wallet, and dial the number.

    1. Re:CALL A LAWYER by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      You must be a lawyer

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:CALL A LAWYER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any sufficiently advanced lawyer is indistinguishable from a human.

    3. Re:CALL A LAWYER by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Fuck lawyers, if you lose you're out a fuckton of money ... if you lose in small claims court you're just out some time and a small fee.

  16. VLC does not access the speakers directly by MpVpRb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..it uses Windows system calls which then call the sound driver

    If the damage was caused by software, it's clearly the fault of the driver

    VLC is too far up the stack to cause anything abnormal

    1. Re:VLC does not access the speakers directly by guruevi · · Score: 0

      This is Windows, any application has direct access to the hardware if it so wishes. Although I agree with you given the architecture of VLC and the fact that even square waves shouldn't blow the speaker.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:VLC does not access the speakers directly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not true, unless the machine is XP, ME, or Win98/95. Everything from Vista on up in the way of sound is handled directly by software. Direct hardware control has been dead for a while on Windows.

    3. Re:VLC does not access the speakers directly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1994 called; they want their DOS-based kernel and runtime back. Your knowledge of Windows's architecture is at least 20 years out of date.

    4. Re:VLC does not access the speakers directly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. The low level customer service agent wouldn't have any technical way of knowing whether or how "the damage was caused by software". NO WAY OF KNOWING. He is a script follower phone monkey, not a technical engineer. Therefore why you are treating this as even a possibility? HE COMPLETELY MADE IT UP.

  17. Already in the law. by Kaenneth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Warrantors cannot require that only branded parts be used with the product in order to retain the warranty.[7] This is commonly referred to as the "tie-in sales" provisions,[8] and is frequently mentioned in the context of third-party computer parts, such as memory and hard drives.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    1. Re:Already in the law. by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      If that's true then a call to your friendly Attorney General's office should fix things right up.

    2. Re:Already in the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warrantors cannot require that only branded parts be used with the product in order to retain the warranty.[7]

      What they can do, however, is refuse warranty claims if that third-party product actually caused the damage.

  18. Just don't do it by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    First of all, they mention VLC only because it happens to have a volume-clipping feature. There's nothing "destroying" about VLC per se, and Dell acknowledges this. Secondly, by booming your speakers with high volume and high-energy audio signal is just asking for trouble. I'm sure that many small tweeters would be damaged by that. You can always find corner cases like this from hardware. Task all CPU cores and all GPU shader units at the same time and many laptops will overheat.

    1. Re:Just don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is crap. hardware engineers should take into account all corner cases.

      i remember an old apple 2 motherboard could be fried through a software loop. that was crap. this is crap if true.

    2. Re:Just don't do it by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It's just that speakers are analog, physical devices with a much higher robustness requirements when driven with an unusual, clipped signal. Why plan for that at all? There's really not much to do about that anyway. Surely you could engineer much tougher speakers that could take the torture but that would start to show in the price of the laptop already, a bit unnecessarily in my opinion. Please tell me if you know how to circumvent this problem.

    3. Re:Just don't do it by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Task all CPU cores and all GPU shader units at the same time and many laptops will overheat.

      That's a defective product. The CPU and GPU units are engineered for a certain thermal capacity, and the product would be advertised as containing these CPUs and GPUs that have a certain number of cores, frequency, etc; the laptop itself must be engineered to handle them at full load, or apply a thermal limiting technology, otherwise the overheat condition when it occurs is a hardware product defect that results in inability to perform as advertised.

    4. Re:Just don't do it by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Please tell me if you know how to circumvent this problem.

      A circuit to detect the clipped audio pattern or dangerous vibration pattern and shut off power to the speaker, or power limit it.

    5. Re:Just don't do it by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      You can put a temperature protection on the voice coils, you can measure the power in the signal and reduce volume (either on the digital or the analogue side).

    6. Re:Just don't do it by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      How about putting a filter (low-pass/high-pass - I'm not an audio engineer, so I don't know) to stop any of the "damaging" waveforms from reaching the speaker? It's probably just a capacitor or inductor in line with it and you could get away with the same shoddy speaker that wouldn't blow from the clipped signal.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    7. Re:Just don't do it by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Too complicated for the purpose.

    8. Re:Just don't do it by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess we could simply regulate the current going to the speaker. But I'm not sure how well that would work.

    9. Re:Just don't do it by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Sure.

    10. Re:Just don't do it by cnettel · · Score: 1

      How about putting a filter (low-pass/high-pass - I'm not an audio engineer, so I don't know) to stop any of the "damaging" waveforms from reaching the speaker? It's probably just a capacitor or inductor in line with it and you could get away with the same shoddy speaker that wouldn't blow from the clipped signal.

      And in all likelihood you would have (non-negligible) worse sound performance for any sane waveform you played. BTW, you could easily script a mechanical hard drive to power off and power on, all the time, for days and days. I am pretty sure a lot of drives would fail in the first year and I would honestly not want the manufacturer to honor the warranty if the total power on count exceeded half a million (powering on once per minute every minute for a year), even though it was all "legal instructions given to the machine".

    11. Re:Just don't do it by sjames · · Score: 1

      Specify the $0.10 speaker, not the $0.08 speaker. Add about $0.10 in analog filter parts to limit the input to the speaker to what it can handle.

      The square peaks in a clipped signal are rounded by a low pass filter.

      It's not like a laptop is going to have a 1000 Watt amplifier.

    12. Re:Just don't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put a small cap in line with the speaker 100pf 25V should do it. It will block the DC clipped signal and allow the active signal to pass.

  19. Bullcrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call this bullcrap. All music nowadays is already compressed to death. The waveforms in the article suggest that tunes normally only reach the maximum value every once in a while. This is simply not the case with modern production. All music is compressed against 0 dB. If that would be problem than playing a regular cd would fry your speakers. The only thing that VLC allows you to do, is clip the audio tracks accompanying films, which are usually not as heavily compressed and may at time even be heard to hear over computer speakers.

    1. Re:Bullcrap by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      That's true indeed. Modern compressed pop music is a very high-energy signal too, and playing that at 100% volume is something that a laptop should be able to handle.

    2. Re:Bullcrap by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2

      I call this bullcrap. All music nowadays is already compressed to death.

      Not everyone listens to the shit music produced in the last few years.

    3. Re:Bullcrap by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Unless you have the actual CD's or records from atleast three decades ago, chances are you are listening to compressed music.
      Current distribution (either physical or digital) of old music is compessed as well.
      As far as I know, only classical music and a tiny fraction of jazz recordings are still distributed with minimal or no compression.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Bullcrap by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Current distribution (either physical or digital) of old music is compessed as well.

      Plenty of it is NOT. Led Zeppelin CDs for one...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Bullcrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Records were analog crap as well, and tubes distorted the hell out of music. So go fuck yourself you audiophile whiner and buy some more Pear Anjou cables.

    6. Re:Bullcrap by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      While the energy in those recordings is much higher than in an unprocessed and undistorted audio signal I bet it is still much lower than a maximum amplitude square wave.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  20. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send your laptop for repair without the hard drives.

  21. Of Course you can use VLC for this. by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

    You can damage speakers by putting too much sound through them. I do not know why there are not more safeguards, but this happens (at least for normal stereo system speakers).

    So any program that allows you to increase the original file volume would only help you do this. Based on what I have seen with the quality of dell laptops, it probably is possible to break the speakers by pumping too much noise out of them, and using VLC to up the file volume could help you do this.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      yeah but for normal stereo system speakers (detached ones, not ones built into a boom box) you're also running an amp that provides high-watt power to them. the speakers are rated for a certain power, and you could attach an amp that provides too much power. If the hardware stack is ok, eg. the max amp output matches the max speaker input, then you should be able to turn the amp up to 11 with no problems.

      separately, what does everybody mean about VLC doing clipping of the waveform for movies? I don't understand this.

    2. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I do not know why there are not more safeguards

      Probably because the safeguards would have to be part of the analog amplification circuit, and anything extra that you put there will potentially hamper sound quality.

    3. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a 16 bit audio signal, the amplitude has a maximum value of 32767. You can amplify a signal (multiply all samples by a fixed factor) such that some samples would end up beyond the amplitude range which can be encoded in 16 bits. Those samples are clipped, i.e. they're set to the maximum amplitude instead. This changes the waveform. In the frequency domain, it adds harmonics (high frequency components at multiples of the base frequency) which weren't in the original signal. These harmonics created by clipping tend to be high energy signal components which stress the speaker more than a "nice" signal. That said, there are artists which employ clipping to create their style, so there's really no excuse for building an audio system that can't handle sustained presence of strong high frequency signal components if you've got the whole chain in your hands (DA-converter, amplifier, speaker).

    4. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Arker · · Score: 1

      Dell has the whole chain here, it's their amplifier and their speaker. Anything VLC will feed into that system is something you could feed into it in other ways as well. That system should be designed so that the amplifier will not send a signal that destroys the speakers no matter what input it is given. If they cut corners and made a system that is given to damaging the speakers, then at minimum they should be replacing said speakers.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    5. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Immerman · · Score: 2

      VLC, and many other programs, give you the option to crank the volume up to 20 or so, well past the normal maximum. Now it can't actually push the hardware past 100%, so what it does instead is amplify the sound wave data before passing it to the audio system.

      Basically all the quiet parts get made as loud as the normal parts would be, the normal parts get as loud as the loud parts were, and the loudest parts... can't get much louder because they're already near the maximum volume. Any time the amplified signal would go past maximum volume it gets "clipped" to maximum instead, because the sound data format is incapable of even representing sounds louder than 100% volume.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Probably because the safeguards would have to be part of the analog amplification circuit, and anything extra that you put there will potentially hamper sound quality.

      So will a broken speaker.

      There's already an amplification circuit in there. If matched up to the speaker's power limit, nothing additional is necessary to safeguard the speaker.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    7. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Should is the key here. And technically they should, but then if they did could they offer laptops at $200 a pop? In some ways Dell purchasers are getting what they paid for.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      There's already an amplification circuit in there. If matched up to the speaker's power limit, nothing additional is necessary to safeguard the speaker.

      You are basically correct.

    9. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Arker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After digging deeper it seems the problem is they have matched a sound card that will put out 10w max and speakers that are only safe up to 6w max. So yes, playing an Iron Maiden album and using VLC to saturate the speakers even more should blow the speakers, it's exactly what I would expect.

      And yes, they do this to cut costs, but they should be calculating warranty costs into it when they decide whether skimping is cost effective. Looks to me like they skipped that step and now want to disclaim their warranty. I get that they are putting out cheap crap because that is what customers demand but I dont think that gives them any legal grounds to deny the warranty.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    10. Re: Of Course you can use VLC for this. by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      There's always a band pass filter between the DAC and the analog amp that drives the speakers. For 44k/16 signals the typical cutoff frequencies are 2Hz and 21kHz. So no matter what you do to the digital signal, you won't be able to hit the speakers with either DC or harmonics greater than 21kHz. Unless, of course, you "cost cut" that filter out of the design.

    11. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Dell paired a high wattage amplifier with a low wattage speaker, which any engineer knows will result in speaker damage.

      Should is the key here. And technically they should, but then if they did could they offer laptops at $200 a pop?

      Dell had several choices. They could have spent a few cents more on a bigger speaker and sold a same-volume-laptop for $200.50, or they could have saved a few cents on a smaller amplifier circuit and sold a slightly-less-loud-laptop for $199.50.

      What they can't do is sell a defective product that self-destructs and refuse to honor the repair warranty.

      In some ways Dell purchasers are getting what they paid for.

      Baloney. They paid for a product that was advertized as having certain capabilities, in specific including a working sound system. Further more they purchased a product that came with both a legal implied warranty of fitness-for-purpose, as well as an express warranty.

      What they were given was a product that unexpectedly self-destructs when you play some sound files.
      (The only way the software is relevant here is that the software causes common sound files to resemble those uncommon sound files which trigger the self-destruct effect, making the hardware defect more commonly visible.)

      The only way "Dell purchasers are getting what they paid for" is in some loony radical libertarian ideology where you call it "getting what you paid for" when someone sells a hair drier with low-and-high settings which unexpectedly melts whenever you use the high setting.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    12. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      So it just plays the whole DVD at 100% loud... Presumably this could accelerate any fatigue in the speakers. What else could it do?

    13. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Yes, but both those alternatives would last longer. I imagine what Dell is trying to do here is engineer a failure around the time that the warranty runs out.

      Yes, they could make a laptop for the same amount of money that does not have this fault, but it will cost them in the long run.

      Meaning that they would have to increase the cost, because now buying a laptop is not an annual thing.
      And it might not be right, but I am not surprised that they try to weasel their way out of honouring their warranties.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    14. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best kind of correct?

    15. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by foobar+bazbot · · Score: 1

      I do not know why there are not more safeguards

      Probably because the safeguards would have to be part of the analog amplification circuit, and anything extra that you put there will potentially hamper sound quality.

      Eh, no. Not unless you're specifically discussing the stereo case, rather than laptops.

      In laptops, phones, and other integrated systems, speaker protection can be, and often is, handled before the DAC with DSP. It's quite easy to keep a rolling average of signal power, and attenuate the signal if that exceeds a given limit. It's not much harder to monitor power in specific frequency ranges, with limits for each band and for any combination. The reason there aren't more safeguards (or that those safeguards prove ineffective) is because, while applying these limits is pretty easy, characterizing the DAC/amplifier/speaker system to determine the proper limits is absolutely not easy.

      More importantly, the obvious solution when you have hard-to-determine limits (perform the best estimate possible given the resources available, and down-rate it by a factor of 2 or so) costs sales because people in Best Buy will, all else being equal, pick the loud laptop over the quiet laptop, and they have no way of knowing the loud one will blow its speakers when fed a square-wave, but the quiet one will be fine. There's probably engineers at Dell right now reading this article and hating their job, their life, and especially their boss, because they wanted to make the correct conservative decision, and the boss demanded they crank it up so it'll sell better.

    16. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by sjwt · · Score: 1

      The power that goes to the speakers is the responsibility of the amp in this case, and having a cheaper underpowered amp is more likely to burn out a speakers.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      Now over driving the speakers is also damaging to them, but the output results are more noticeable, and most ppl turn them down.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    17. Re: Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there's a low pass filter, so there are no inaudibly high frequencies going to the amplifier. I wasn't trying to suggest there were. The harmonics are in the audible range. That's why the clipped signal sounds like crap. The clipping doesn't create anything you couldn't put in a WAV file. Anyway, these kinds of waveforms do stress the speakers a lot more than a normal signal. With low power speakers, that's still no excuse for physical damage. The speakers should be sufficiently robust to handle anything the amp can throw at them. The power density really isn't high enough at these levels to cause problems in a well balanced audio system design.

    18. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      separately, what does everybody mean about VLC doing clipping of the waveform for movies? I don't understand this.

      Many movies available on the net have the sound recorded too low. So VLC comes with an option to boost the audio beyond what is normally available from the PC's volume control by digitally boosting the level before passing it to the sound card. If this is used on a movie where the audio level is not recorded too low, then clipping can result, which can potentially destroy speakers and amps.

    19. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Probably because the safeguards would have to be part of the analog amplification circuit, and anything extra that you put there will potentially hamper sound quality.

      This is why the safeguards are generally found in mid-range systems only. High end amps are engineered to not damage themselves in the presence of DC output into speakers which potentially offer only 1 or 2 ohm of DC resistance, and assume that you will match the amplifier with similarly well-engineered speakers. Low end amps skip them to save cost (as in the Dell case).

    20. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That's it. It won't even be anywhere near 100% average, probably not even near 50% average - the distortion would be *horrible* unless there was very little variation in volume to begin with.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    21. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by sjames · · Score: 1

      They mean VLC can do compression to make it sound louder. The same thing is done on many audio CDs these days. Sound quality naturally suffers, but if you just want it to sound loud, it'll do it.

      Many here seem to believe it's like over-driving an amp, but it is not.

    22. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by sjames · · Score: 1

      As cheap as the speakers must be to burn out like that, broken glass in the speaker wouldn't likely hamper sound quality all that much.

    23. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by sjames · · Score: 1

      but then if they did could they offer laptops at $200 a pop?

      They might have to go as high as $200.10

    24. Re:Of Course you can use VLC for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is too much? How would people even know about the limit?

      If the speaker has no safeguard, it is faulty by design and Dell is responsible for putting it into laptop in the first place.

  22. Re:Tell them... by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you realize that the "fuck beta" comments are already much more annoying than the actual beta?

    Fuck "fuck beta" comments.

  23. So is it be possible to record VLC output... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is it be possible to record VLC output and play it back with, say, windows media player?
    Unless some players have filters for low frequency square wave or direct current component, they would play it like VLC.
    Some sound card drivers could have this kind of filter. and Linux + VLC probably do not.
    So Dell might have some point in this. Reason for this kind of design would be money. (surprise!)
    It would be expensive to use components that can always handle the worst case for long times.

    1. Re:So is it be possible to record VLC output... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It would be expensive to use components that can always handle the worst case for long times.

      Exactly.

    2. Re: So is it be possible to record VLC output... by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      So they were playing "risk management" then, didn't they? We all know where that leads to.

  24. Slashdot them. by michaelcole · · Score: 1

    Facebook if you must. Then send them the link.

  25. back that train up by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    The correct answer is: why the hell did you buy a Dell, you idiot? Buy a real laptop! The best 5 with the lowest defects are Asus, MSI, Toshiba, Samsung, Sony and they also have the highest rated support quality.

    1. Re:back that train up by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      remember the commercials, dude you got a dell! that guy was funny.

    2. Re:back that train up by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      The correct answer is: why the hell did you buy a Dell, you idiot? Buy a real laptop! The best 5 with the lowest defects are Asus, MSI, Toshiba, Samsung, Sony and they also have the highest rated support quality.

      Apple. Best quality and best support.

    3. Re:back that train up by andydread · · Score: 1

      Sony? *cough*. Their support is by far worse than Dell in my experience. They are a build it and forget it manufacturer. Now it may well be that this issue may not have happend on Sony engineered hardware but if you do have issues then you will usually have better luck getting a bus to fly rather than getting any help from them.

    4. Re:back that train up by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      You can destroy two Dell laptops, buy a third and still spend less than a single Apple laptop.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:back that train up by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      If you use the cheapest consumer pieces of crap from Dell as an example - sure. Their business class machines (the ones with at least remotely comparable build quality) are not _that_ much cheaper.

    6. Re:back that train up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now it may well be that this issue may not have happend on Sony engineered hardware but but if you do have issues then you will usually have better luck getting a bus to fly rather than getting any help from them.

      In Soviet Russia, you make the fly go bus

      Also, do not forget to protest beta becoming mandatory by staying away the next week.

    7. Re:back that train up by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      You can destroy two Dell laptops, buy a third and still spend less than a single Apple laptop.

      Sure, if your data and time are worthless. My time and data are worth a lot of money. I pay more to make sure that I don't unnecessarily sacrifice either.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    8. Re:back that train up by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      They're 6th place actually.

    9. Re:back that train up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,

      Oh man thanks, thats the funniest thing I've seen in ages!

    10. Re:back that train up by sjames · · Score: 1

      Every time he said that, I heard the laughter at the end of Legend in my head.

  26. Devil's advocate by kurkosdr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Playing the devil's advocate here, but most audio waveforms look like sine-waves (so to speak). Converting the waveform to a square-wave (what VLC's clipping does when you push the volume above 100%) puts a prolonged stress on the speakers even if you don't increase max output, which most speakers can't withstand. And the VLC dudes have helpfully mapped the volume controls to the scroll wheel, so you 'll probably push the volune above 100% accidentally. Thhe ability to push volume above 100% should be disabled by default IMO. Anyway, if your Dell fries speakers but can stilk boot, uninstall VLC and KM Player.

    1. Re:Devil's advocate by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Running DC through a speaker is practically impossible with any halfway decent implemented amp (even the all-in-one chips you buy for these purposes have such protection). Good individual speakers will have a protection circuit as well. Heck, a simple condenser would do the trick (given these tin sheets don't produce any worthwhile sound anyway). This is simply an issue of using sub-par speakers, mismatched to the power output of the miniature amp, not enough cooling for the amp (depending on what the issue is) or using a sub-par design to drive the speakers.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Devil's advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Downvoted already, no reply with refutation from the downvoter of course. Arrogant slashdot neckbeards have to stand for arrogant developers, because they code FOSS I guess. Where would FOSS be without arrogance amd overgrown infants (neckbeards) policing the internet?? (by downvoting of course, no refutation).

      Welcome to slashdot! It isn't customary around here for someone that downvotes to post why they did it. One reason for this is that by posting a reason while they are logged in all moderation that they've done in that article would be undone. Since you didn't already know this I'm assuming you must be new around here. Again, welcome to slashdot..... And beware the beta....

    3. Re:Devil's advocate by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Speakers should be able any kind of input that is sent to them, sine wave or not. The reason is that, if there is some kind of input that can actually damage the hardware, then that's a glaring security hole because audio is one of the most common things that is streamed over the Internet these days, and with Flash and/or HTML5 audio, websites can play arbitrary waves at will.

    4. Re:Devil's advocate by pruss · · Score: 1

      I am not a sound engineer, but here's my impression of the issue. The maximum volume in the hardware is presumably set against typically expected waveforms. For instance, normally, if you watch a movie, there is no sustained high level sound. When there is no sound at all, the speaker coils and amp can cool off; during speech the background music is quiet or nonexistent and the pauses between words and variations in loudness will allow for further cooling; and so on.

      The waveform compression in the volume boost reduces the differences between quieter and louder sounds, and thereby decreases the opportunities for cooling. This is going to be particularly true in the case of sustained playback of music.

      If one sets the maximum volume in the hardware or firmware so that the speakers can survive sustained compressed sound, then the result will be that the speakers will be terrible for hearing speech in movies and radio. Granted, this could be fixed with higher quality speakers and better heat sinks, but that would increase cost and the audio system may need to be physically larger, while people like their laptops small and thin.

      I guess temperature sensors in the speakers and the amp might help, and/or smart firmware that not only controls the maximum output but reduces output when high volume is sustained.

      Another solution is honesty and user education: just explain to users that built-in speakers can be worn out with sustained compressed audio, and leave it to the users to decide how to balance audibility with risks to hardware.

      (Like I said, I am not an engineer, but I do make a sound boost open source app for Android, which works by using the equalizer API to do presumably the same thing that VLC does. I put very obvious warnings about possibilities of damage to hearing and hardware in the app, but nonetheless the app was useful for movies and audio books. But using it for sustained loud music would be a bad idea. As of 4.2.1, Google patched the OS not to allow boost sound above default maxima. This protects speakers but is paternalistic and makes movies nearly unwatchable on some devices, I expect. Tradeoffs...)

  27. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't speak for this old timer. Stop bloody ruining every thread with your immature anti-beta posts.
    Beta is not ruining my time on Slashdot, YOU ARE!

    Send your feedback via the email they they have provided and leave it at that. If they do not listen to your feedback, then feel free to vote with your feet, but stop ruining the site for everybody else.

    ps. Why hide behind anonymity?

  28. Not Dell's Fault Necessarily by acm5fan · · Score: 1

    Are you driving the audio past 100% ever? If you are, you are only distorting the signal before it hits the power amplifier. The more distortion that hits the voice coil and the spider, the more likely it is to be damaged by driving the amp and speaker hard. Class D amps should not be driven beyond 50% either as it only adds more and more distortion to the waveform produced at the speaker. Plug in an external for movie watching. If you are driving the amp at 100% and VLC volume at 200%, I wouldn't warrant you either. That's negligence. Good luck.

    1. Re:Not Dell's Fault Necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the field of 'Hardware Engineering' to survive, the hardware must work no matter what the 'software' does. Otherwise electronics is 'hit and miss' and is useless. Why are you people accepting crap? Electronics can be high quality and inexpensive iff people have a taste for quality and even insist on it.

      If it was a crap design then the engineer needs to be fired. I've met many competent hardware engineers that would not let crap like this (supposed) problem get out of the door.

      Why don't people insist on quality instead of crap??

    2. Re:Not Dell's Fault Necessarily by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      " you are driving the amp at 100% and VLC volume at 200%, I wouldn't warrant you either. That's negligence" I believe it's accidental, not on purpose. As i said in the post above yours, VLC has it's volume controls mapped to the scroll wheel, so you may accidentally push volume above 100% without realizing it. Especially if you use the touchpad. Stupid design decision (allow user to push volume above 100% by default) compounded by silliness (volume control mapped to the scroll wheel). But the VLC dudes have an arrogance measured in metric tonnes, so they 'll probably defend the scroll wheel thing, as they 've done in the past.

    3. Re: Not Dell's Fault Necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't every player have the volume mapped to the scroll wheel? Like... EVERY player?

  29. loudness war! by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

    If dell's speakers are damaged by playing clipped audio, couldn't the same damage be caused by playing a poorly-mastered CD?

    eg: http://mastering-media.blogspo...

  30. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life's so unfair, boohoo. Idiot.

  31. Maybe VLC goes to 11 by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Maybe VLC goes to 11 by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      This is my first thought... ;)

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  32. Re:Small Claims + Other Options by esten · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ask Dell what the cost of the repairs are then fill in small claims court for that amount.

    Some other things you might do are:
    1. Complain to BBB
    2. Talk to your credit card company you have have additional warranty service under them.
    3. Email CEO. michael@dell.com & link to Slashdot story

    4. Nuke option. Have Slashdot email CEO michael@dell.com
    (Would we crash their email server?)

  33. Why would you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1- Why would you want to drive your laptop speakers that hard?
    2- Reading the explanation of what VLC player is doing on the linked forum, why would someone want to listen to boosted, clipped audio?

    - I know it's fun to bash Dell as the bad guy, but VLC is basically hacking the audio playback to get much higher average amplitude. So Dell's options are to -
    a) Over-engineer the speakers to be able to handle higher output than the system would be able to deliver in normal circumstances so it can handle VLC. This would of course increase cost.
    b) Artificially limit the volume in normal conditions so the speakers can handle the boosted/clipped output. This would decrease normal volume.
    c) Have some sort of VLC (or similar) blocking logic in the firmware or driver. In which case Slashdotters would be up in arms at Dell blocking functionality of some poor third party player.

  34. Cinema speakers can be damaged too by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You would think that cinema speakers (those big honkin' speakers that sit behind the screen at the movie theatre - mine are about about six feet tall but there are many larger than that) would be impervious to damage but some movies occasionally overdrive the speakers to a point that the drivers are damaged. The most recent one that I'm aware of is Paranormal Activity 2: The Marked Ones, where there was 7 seconds of high pitched buzzing on reel 4 that could destroy the speakers.

    Here is an email from Paramount that describes the problem:

    QUOTE:
    Dear Projectionist,
    Paramount has had reports of speaker damage from some theatres playing PARANORMAL ACTIVITY: THE MARKED ONES. In several cases we have been able to research, the volume had been turned up to high levels at patronsâ(TM) requests.

    We are currently working to get information on speaker/amplifier brand and model to see if any particular combination of hardware might be more susceptible to damage. At this time, most of the damaged speakers have been identified as JBL model 4632â(TM)s, but this is preliminary data.

    We are also working on an audio patch which may lessen the potential for damage.

    For the time being, please do not set your volume at a high level on this film.

    Thank you for your cooperation.

    END OF QUOTE
    Technicolor sent out a new soundtrack for that movie without the 7 seconds of buzzing and as far as I know that solved the problem.

    The point here is that even high-end cinema audio systems can be damaged by a poorly engineered soundtrack, so I'm not surprised to find that the speakers in a cheap laptop could be damaged the same way.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never blame the users of hardware for the hardware failings. You make electronics seem like flaky things and are untrustworthy.

      The only untrustworthy jerk that is to blame is the person who calls himself a 'hardware engineer' and who is actually a fraud raking in a bunch of cash using limited knowledge.

    2. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not want to listen to that!. Why do horror movie directors and sound engineers feel the need to damage my hearing with abrupt, sharp sounds to illicit fear in the audience? It's not scary, just annoying as fuck.

    3. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cinema audio system is professional equipment. Professional users are held to higher standards than "I need this to be louder" consumers.

    4. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      You really don't see the difference between a 4 watt laptop speaker and a 10,000 watt cinema quality surround sound system?

      It's possible that the speaker was overdriven on the laptop, but then thats the laptops fault clearly. With high wattage audio gear, the amplifier can often put out more power than the speakers can take. One would think dell would easily make sure that did not happen in their simple, low power, controlled environment.

      I've had to deal with dell tech support. Its all outsourced and awful. If 99% of people are fooled by "you broke it stupid" I am not surprised that they would try that and even stick to their guns until the bitter end.

      --
      -
    5. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      While what you've said is true, I'm sure you'd agree that there's a big difference between the two situations. If cinema speakers are getting blown out, that's on the cinema owner for throwing more power at them than they can handle. They only have themselves to blame if they put too much power through their own speakers, since they purchased all of the component parts and should have known what they were capable of handling.

      If Dell laptops speakers are getting blown out, however, that's on Dell, since they shouldn't have designed a system that was capable of throwing more power at the speakers than they could handle. It's not difficult to dial back the amplifier a bit so that this is a non-issue, but they chose not to do so, and thus invited this on themselves. The user really has no control over it, and has every reason to believe that the speakers should be able to survive anything that can be put through them during normal operation. And given that the audio in question could have easily been converted into an audio track and played on any computer, I don't see how this can be considered something other than normal operation.

    6. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by hankwang · · Score: 2

      You would think that cinema speakers ... would be impervious to damage but some movies occasionally overdrive the speakers to a point that the drivers are damaged. ... there was 7 seconds of high pitched buzzing on reel 4 that could destroy the speakers.

      A big difference is that those are speakers with separate woofers and tweeters. A typical audio signal has the vast majority of the acoustic signal in the low frequencies, so a loudspeaker capable of handling 100 W could have 90 W for the woofer and 10 W for the tweeter. If you send a maximum-amplitude high-pitched sound to the speaker, it will fry the voice coils in the tweeters. (I've had this happen when I tried to check whether I could hear up to 20 kHz from my loudspeakers ....)

      One could wonder why tweeters are not fused, though. Apparently this is not trivial.

      Anyway, laptop speakers are most likely a single driver for the whole frequency range, so tweeter overloading is not an issue.

    7. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, tweeters tend to overload much easier than midrange or bass because the weight of the components has to be kept low for audio performance. Not an issue with all-in-one laptop speakers.

    8. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by admiralfurburger · · Score: 1

      Agree with the premise of certain types of tones definitely being speaker killers.
      BUT, JBL builds easily damaged drivers. I've got a pair of 36" JBL cellular horns. The 50w JBL drivers weigh about 8 pounds each & were nothing but trouble. Replaced them with 50w Altec Lansing drivers that weigh over 30 pounds each. That was in 1993. Haven't had a problem since...

      And to n3r0.m4dski11z, the 4632 handles the following wattages:
      LF: 800W
      MF: 200W
      HF: 50W
      It's probably the 50W HF driver that goes. Those ones look about 1/2 the size of the 50 watters I had, that were consistently releasing the magic smoke...

    9. Re:Cinema speakers can be damaged too by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I've long wondered why they don't wind a few rotations of heat-sensitive wire, measure the coil's temperature and the first few derivatives thereof, and send a signal back to the amp saying "whoa Nelly, cut that back a little/lot/as needed." When I first thought of the idea it would have required fairly complicated electronics, but today I imagine it could be done pretty cheaply.

  35. One louder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    C'mon, everybody knows that VLC is one louder than the rest.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sRhuh8Aphc

  36. Sorry for the Offtopic by excelsior_gr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry for the Offtopic comment, but I thought I'd put this out there just before the anti-Beta boycott officially starts:

    Whoever posts stories, comments, moderates or meta-moderates the coming week using the classic Slashdot interface is a hypocrite.

    If you like the Beta or couldn't care less about it, then you should use it actively and prove by your participation that you accept it. I think we can be democratic about it and let the community choose. If the comment sections of the articles look alive and well by next Monday, this will mean that the community chose Beta. If AC comments are listening to the crickets, this will mean that the comments are by passer-bys and the actual community chose Classic.

    Dixi.

    1. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC commentators are part of the community too. Where would Slashdot be without us? Stop laughing.

    2. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      Whoever posts stories, comments, moderates or meta-moderates the coming week using the classic Slashdot interface is a hypocrite.

      I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      If the comment sections of the articles look alive and well by next Monday, this will mean that the community chose Beta.

      No, all it'll mean is that people continued to post. It won't tell you why. Personally I'm planning to post twice as much next week just to spite this self-appointed over-inflated self-righteous crusaders-for-galactic-justice brigade.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      And I think you should buy a freaking dictionary.

    4. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      And I think you should buy a freaking dictionary.

      Exactly! Must be the new audience arriving early. I honestly think so many people do not understand the situation with the beta at all. Too hard thinky. I thought people here were a bit smarter, but maybe not. Perhaps we are best off in a new place and leaving em all here after all...

    5. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Whoever posts stories, comments, moderates or meta-moderates the coming week using the classic Slashdot interface is a hypocrite.

      Why would someone be a hypocrite simply by doing the above? Why would they be a hypocrite next week but not a hypocrite today? Just because some people have arbitrarily decided that next week is boycott week, it doesn't mean we're all suddenly bound by a covenant.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by zidium · · Score: 0

      If you had principles, you would join the boycott to protect the very site you love!

      But you may just be a newbie, poser, feminine, or weak.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    7. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I honestly think so many people do not understand the situation with the beta at all.

      Or they do and they disagree with you. That doesn't make them automatically wrong.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll break it down for you.

      However arbitrary the boycott may seem to you, there is some support behind it. Now, if someone decides to ignore it, but still chooses to use the classic interface, wouldn't you agree that they thus show support for Beta, although they don't like using it? They would not participate in the boycott, although they actually support its meaning and purpose (by choosing not to use Beta for posting). Thus the hypocrisy.

      You are definitely not bound by any covenant. Feel free to post as much as you want the coming week. But if you really want to make a point, post your comments using the Beta interface.

    9. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Now, if someone decides to ignore it, but still chooses to use the classic interface, wouldn't you agree that they thus show support for Beta, although they don't like using it?

      Er, no, I wouldn't agree, at all. Ignoring the boycott and using classic supports beta? Then what does ignoring the boycott and using beta do?

      But if you really want to make a point, post your comments using the Beta interface.

      Or I could just not and say I did.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    10. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      if (sarcasm) then bravo; else {

      If you had principles...

      ...I wouldn't waste them over the redesign of a free website.

      you would join the boycott to protect the very site you love!

      Who says I love it? I'd have thought it was obvious that I don't care that much.

      For that matter, who says I don't think beta is better?

      But you may just be a newbie, poser, feminine, or weak.

      Or maybe I just disagree with your point of view and/or way of doing things. Is that still allowed?

      I take it that not descending to name-calling is not one of your principles.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    11. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by dk20 · · Score: 1

      So you love the site so much that you all post "anti-beta" comments to every thread ruining it for the rest of us? Now we should also join your "boycott"?

    12. Re:Sorry for the Offtopic by jrumney · · Score: 1

      When the calls for a boycott started last week, it appeared that the beta site was being steamrolled and feedback ignored. The developers posted a story last week saying that they will slow down the rollout, and start to take the criticism on-board. Some of us think that they should be given a chance to prove themselves, and won't be joining the boycott, nor will we start to use a beta interface that is clearly not ready. This is not hypocrisy.

  37. Slashdot (Beta)* Nuke Option - Email CEO by esten · · Score: 0

    1. Email CEO of Dell, Michael Dell (Michael@dell.com) with your problems with customer service. Link to Slashdot articles

    2. Have Slashdot email CEO, crash email server?

    * Mention beta to get troll comments and/or everyone's attention

  38. I tip the repairguy. by megabeck42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always include a $20.00 and a note when I send a laptop in for repair. In the note I explain exactly what I'd like done. Always works with Lenovo.

    --
    fnord.
    1. Re:I tip the repairguy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With my lenovos it has worked without the tip quite the same.

      Quite means that one time they didn't replace the lid hinges with ~1 cm yawn one month before the end of warranty.

    2. Re:I tip the repairguy. by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      I always include a $20.00 and a note when I send a laptop in for repair. In the note I explain exactly what I'd like done. Always works with Lenovo.

      You shouldn't have to bribe the employee to get a contractually-obliged fix done.

  39. Too much amplifier... by unitron · · Score: 1

    ...kills woofers.

    Not enough amplifier kills tweeters, because clipping produces high-frequency (as in higher than you can hear) square waves and the tweeters cannot respond to that high a frequency and so the energy is turned into heat instead of air movement and it burns out their voice coils.

    Maybe that's what Dell is trying to say happened here.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  40. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yep FUCK BETA!!!

    Didn't know how to give my opinion...

    Oh by the way, just we are not against it because it's new, and we don't like change. We just don't like ugly change.
    Same with windows 8, people don't hate it, because it's different. People hate it because it's terrible to use, and looks ugly too...

    I want something new, that's easier to use, faster, or more features, or looks better... Not change for change....

  41. Hey man... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    "The numbers all go to eleven. Look, right across the board, eleven, eleven, eleven and..." -This is Spinal Tap

    After 30 years, the debate rages on - is '11' any louder than 10?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re: Hey man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is, it one louder !

    2. Re:Hey man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11 would be infinitely loud. If that were achieved we would all turn into lizards.

  42. If I were a lawyer by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    If I were a lawyer I'd provide you with legal advice. And charge you for it of course.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  43. This is not software, it is wrong design by NuclearCat · · Score: 1

    In case Dell used speakers that are not rated even for their motherboard amplifier - it is trivial to detect audio clipping that VLC cause, just a plain resistor and current sensing circuit, or a comparator on output circuit and it will be easy to shut it, before speaker got damaged.
    In car industry it will be a recall and faulty items will be replaced by modified ones, with "bugfix".
    But it is very known - freaks like HP and Dell prefer to charge customers for each sneeze, and as soon as you paid and took your product - you are on your own. No bugfixes, no support, no improvements.

  44. Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by jrronimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a user whose laptop was replaced by Dell under warranty, except that they sent him back a 17" monstrosity rather than the 13" machine he had at the time. They wouldn't budget on giving him something smaller. After filing a small claims court case, they reimbursed him for the price of his original laptop and I think told him to keep the new one, too. He was happy after that.

    Another friend had a HTC One phone whose screen popped and shattered while he was browsing twitter. HTC refused the replacement despite being a month old, claiming he dropped it. After filing a Better Business Bureau complaint, they replaced it under warranty.

    Either way, something like that will get someone's eye and hopefully the original poster will be happy. The bigger problem is that this is a thing Dell will break a warranty over, which is ridiculous.

    1. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who dropped his HTC One, which popped and shattered the screen. He didn't want to pay for a new one, so he told everybody it happened while he was browsing Twitter. Unfortunately, HTC didn't believe in fairy tales, so he filed a complaint with the BBB. Anyway, he was just sticking it to the Man, so it's a victimless crime.

    2. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my screen is always exploding whenever I'm just holding the phone, never happens when I drop it.

    3. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're holding it wrong!

    4. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by jrronimo · · Score: 1

      You guys don't have to believe it, but he's someone I trust and who wouldn't make up the story to me. I've known him long enough that I believe what he says.

    5. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by jrronimo · · Score: 1

      As I said above, this is someone I trust at his word. If he had dropped it, he would have owned up to it. He buys enough phones from HTC that he is happy to give them the business. You don't have to believe the story, but I do.

    6. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys don't have to believe it, but he's someone I trust and who wouldn't make up the story to me. I've known him long enough that I believe what he says.

      Well then Great!
      Some random asshole on slashdot using the name "jrronimo" is obviously the ONLY source of vetting I should ever consider. There's NO WAY that's a play on the word "geronimo" as opposed to his real name. Why yes, I do believe that's enough of a character testimonial to entrust this person with the care of my children and a stack of gold bars I need kept safe.

    7. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Cassini2 · · Score: 2

      After doing the same demo a hundred times, I opened the screen of a brand new laptop to show a client. It cracked right before the client's eyes.

      Asus replaced the screen on the laptop, with some difficulty, but they did replace it. Never underestimate the potential for a latent stress fracture.

    8. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I said above, this is someone I trust at his word. If he had dropped it, he would have owned up to it. He buys enough phones from HTC that he is happy to give them the business. You don't have to believe the story, but I do.

      You trust him. Isn't that special?

      Now, tell us why we should trust YOU.

    9. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, I'm the AC above, and I believe you. I was just trying to be funny. I've had my share of both fielding bullshit from customers looking to make a buck at the expense of a lenient complaints policy and also my share of WTF just happened, I can't believe this broke apart in my hands. It's really hard to tell the difference sometimes.

    10. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      You trust him. Isn't that special?

      Now, tell us why we should trust YOU.

      Because he's "jrronimo", not "Beta"?

      (Sorry....I couldn't help it...)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    11. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I don't think you quite understand. A lot of very trustworthy people will attempt a fraud if they think they can get away with it and they think they're "sticking it to the man".

      As a result, and I do mean no offence to you or your friend, the chances of you being gullible or simply too trusting is far, FAR greater than chance of his phone's screen "randomly popping while he was using twitter".

    12. Re: Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i will vouche for jrronimo, if it helps. no way i'm goin for that f'n beta tho. that beta's crap

    13. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It is readily understandable why Dell would break warranty on the speaker. They can not bill the supplier and, the high labour cost to dis-assemble the laptop, insert speaker and reassemble laptop. Who do you think pays for the bulk of Dell warranty claims, Dell or the part supplier? How do you think the ability of Dell to shift the cost of a warranty repair affects their willingness to honour the warranty?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:Definitely Small Claims and/or BBB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is mainly an issue with modern glossy screens. Typically these are a 3 layer sandwich with the outer layer of scratch resistant glass being one of the main structural components of the device. Lots of room for an invisibly small nick to grow into a complete fracture.

  45. Its simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steps to take before court.

    Step 1, Go back and ask for their denial to fix a simple problem under warranty in writing and signed by their manager. (you must get it in writing otherwise their story will keep changing and make sure it says why they denied the repair.

    Step 2, Go to an independent computer tech and get a quote (ideally get 3 quotes) in Writing (this is important) Also ask nicely if they would put in writing that and software you have on your machine cant damage the speaker (say your fighting dell, most tech's hate them for their shoddy hardware and customer abuse)

    Step 3, File for a small claim using the Documents you just got as evidence, also make sure you only claim for the lowest repair (from the quotes you got) and any associated costs (if the quotes cost you something) Don't ask for damages or emotional distress payments the judge will award you these if he feels its necessary but they hate when people take a small claim and ask for massive reparations to be paid.

  46. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by ZeroPly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know very little about audio, but a cursory search turned this up from Wikipedia:

    "Because the clipped waveform has more area underneath it than the smaller unclipped waveform, the amplifier produces more power than its rated (sine wave) output when it is clipping. This extra power can damage any part of the loudspeaker, including the woofer, or the tweeter, by causing over-excursion, or by overheating the voice coil. It may cause damage to the amplifier's power supply or simply blow a fuse."

    The digital signal obviously has to be converted to analog at some point, so I believe this is what Dell is talking about.

    --
    Support microSD: in a post 9/11 world, it is unwise to carry your data on media that you cannot comfortably swallow.
  47. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by unitron · · Score: 1

    It's possible that they lurked for a l-o-o-o-ng time before signing up for an account (apparently about a year ago or a little less, judging by comment dates) and that's why their UID is so high.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  48. Today's class action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want is a "viral facebook outrage" class action. Go for it.

  49. Re:Tell them... by XaXXon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason I'm going to leave /. is the fuck beta comments, not the beta itself.

    This is almost as bad as the reddit /r/atheism crap from a while ago.

  50. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anything VLC or any other media player outputs can be put in a WAV file which produces the exact same output when played with Windows Media Player. You can put a full amplitude low frequency square wave into a media file and that is much like a worst-case clipped signal. It is still a valid WAV file though, and some music styles use square waves all the time. Another example of a "demanding" signal is the output of 80s era computer synths. Play a SID file, look at the waveform and weep, Dell.

  51. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by znanue · · Score: 1

    Or, like me, lost access to their first id. (I no longer have access to the original email account and I had forgotten the password)

  52. Email the company's lawyer by pem · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously.

    The people who advocate small claims are half right. In many states, you have to send a demand letter before you can do that anyway.

    Some idiots will say to email the CEO, but if you're lucky, that will just get down to the lawyer, and the lawyer will already be miffed because you've piled more work on him from above. Better to go straight to the lawyer.

    I have had several successes, some quite large, and no failures, with the following strategy:

    1) Try sincerely to resolve it through normal channels, as you apparently have.

    2) Document how that didn't work. If you don't have good documentation, do (1) again.

    3) Find the attorney or registered agent's email address. I have never had a problem doing this, but I'm pretty good at the google-fu. Good starting points for names are corporate bios, 10K filings at the SEC, and the Secretary of State's office (which might require a phone call). Since Dell is in Texas, they are required to have a registered agent with the Texas Secretary of state. I live in Texas, and I got Fry's registered agent's name from the Texas Secretary of State when I had an issue with them.

    4) Send the attorney an email POLITELY explaining exactly what happened, and what needs to happen to make you a happy camper. Give them two deadlines. The first one should be about two weeks out to let the legal department research the problem on their end. The second one, at the end of the email, goes something like this:

    "Please acknowledge receipt of this email within three days to save me the time and expense of sending a registered letter."

    A registered letter is exactly what you need to do, in most cases, to put them on notice before you file in small claims. So this sentence puts them on notice that you are preparing to legally put them on notice, and since your speaker repair is way cheaper than dealing with you in court (you're not claiming the bad speaker damaged your hearing, or lost you business when the presentation went awry, are you?), they should be more than happy to do that.

    One purpose of the letter that cannot be stressed enough is that you are not arguing with the lawyer. You are essentially presenting the same case that you would present in court. Your letter should be polite, without speling or grandmar erors, and compelling. Do not attempt lawyerese, because that is not required or even encouraged in small claims court. Just write it in plain English. You are not arguing with the lawyer, but you are showing him that you will present yourself well in court, and after expending time and money to defend, he will stand a good chance of losing.

    1. Re:Email the company's lawyer by ledow · · Score: 1

      "Some idiots will say to email the CEO, but if you're lucky, that will just get down to the lawyer, and the lawyer will already be miffed because you've piled more work on him from above. Better to go straight to the lawyer."

      You think the CEO reads anything like a publicly-accessible email account? It all goes to "the right department" exclusively via some email-reading minion. You think emailing the CEO of Dell about a laptop return is going to make them go yell at a lawyer?

      Email the company at head office and it will end up at the person they deem right to deal with it. If you yell a lot it might go to their line manager. It won't get close to an expensive lawyer (or even legal department) until you get a court order at the very least.

      Welcome to the world of modern customer service, where "the boss" is the guy who was good at answering the phones last month, and you can never get hold of him anyway.

      As someone who - in the past few months - has complained to Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (who demanded tax returns going back 6 years despite me not being required to file them any more), had their car insurance settle out of court after cancelling my contract - without notice - in breach of contract (and actually a shed-load of other laws), and have several companies referred to Trading Standards (some of which dragged on for months), I can tell you that not until there's a real, genuine threat of a lawsuit (i.e. a court paper coming through the post) will anyone even CLOSE to a legal professional get involved.

      The first guy is always useless. Their boss is usually useless. But in any organisation of a decent size, there are dozens of layers in between. If you're really lucky, you'll get a letter signed "on behalf of" (P.P.) a qualified lawyer by his legal secretary who signs a pile of similar papers every day, from those people who bother to complain enough that they probably have a genuine cause but it's just not worth chasing to court.

      People do not know how to complain. Of course, you address your letter to Head Office but if you think for a second that a corporate lawyer does more than flick the paper onto a pile for some underling to sort out, until an actual court-stamped paper comes to them, then you're sadly mistaken.

      And, fuck email. In the UK - at least, I assume the US is similar - every company has to provide a postal address of their head office on demand. It's a legal requirement (and I've got a company fined for failing to do just that while I was complaining about something else). Emails go to an underling that sits in front of an inbox and spam folder all day. Letters are verifiable proof-of-receipt and instantly admissible in court and undeniable if you send by a recorded delivery.

      They also get more attention because every idiot can send an email to complaints@ or headoffice@ but not every idiot will bother to send you a letter stating in black and white that you are wrong and these are the facts as they know them. And you have to READ THE DAMN THINGS. Emails you can scan for keywords and auto-reply from a standard template . Letters some git has to type up a reply to, print it out, address it and send it back to you.

      People just don't know how to complain any more.

    2. Re:Email the company's lawyer by pem · · Score: 1

      "Some idiots will say to email the CEO, but if you're lucky, that will just get down to the lawyer, and the lawyer will already be miffed because you've piled more work on him from above. Better to go straight to the lawyer."

      You think the CEO reads anything like a publicly-accessible email account? It all goes to "the right department" exclusively via some email-reading minion. You think emailing the CEO of Dell about a laptop return is going to make them go yell at a lawyer?

      Apparent reading comprehension fail. I said to email the lawyer because if you email the CEO, it will only get to the lawyer if you're lucky.

      Email the company at head office and it will end up at the person they deem right to deal with it. If you yell a lot it might go to their line manager. It won't get close to an expensive lawyer (or even legal department) until you get a court order at the very least.

      The plural of anecdote is not data, but in my 10-15 experiences (probably closer to 30 if you count the experiences of the people I have individually counselled on how to deal with obstreperous customer service), it is extremely easy to get a lawyer's attention if you go about it correctly.

      Welcome to the world of modern customer service, where "the boss" is the guy who was good at answering the phones last month, and you can never get hold of him anyway.

      Right. Which is why you spend a bit of time doing that, document it well, and then go to the lawyer. Again, you are not trying to convince the lawyer that you are in the right. You are trying to convince the lawyer that you will be able to convince a judge or jury that you are in the right. Completely different things.

      As someone who - in the past few months - has complained to Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (who demanded tax returns going back 6 years despite me not being required to file them any more), had their car insurance settle out of court after cancelling my contract - without notice - in breach of contract (and actually a shed-load of other laws), and have several companies referred to Trading Standards (some of which dragged on for months), I can tell you that not until there's a real, genuine threat of a lawsuit (i.e. a court paper coming through the post) will anyone even CLOSE to a legal professional get involved.

      And I'm telling you that, in my considerable experience, you can convince them that (a) you are capable of managing the lawsuit; and (b) you are perfectly willing to do so -- without actually directly threatening.

      The first guy is always useless. Their boss is usually useless. But in any organisation of a decent size, there are dozens of layers in between. If you're really lucky, you'll get a letter signed "on behalf of" (P.P.) a qualified lawyer by his legal secretary who signs a pile of similar papers every day, from those people who bother to complain enough that they probably have a genuine cause but it's just not worth chasing to court.

      I have always either (a) gotten communication from the lawyer; or (b) just had the right thing happen (for example, several times I got no response, but a full refund on a credit card. Obviously YMMV.

      People do not know how to complain.

      And I'm trying to rectify that. You're helping to make my point for me. I have had a dozen positive outcomes after following the approach I outlined.

      Of course, you address your letter to Head Office but if you think for a second that a corporate lawyer does more than flick the paper onto a pile for some underling to sort out, until an actual court-stamped paper comes to them, then you're sadly mistaken.

      I didn't say to address a letter to "Head Office." I said to address it to a lawyer. The lawyer th

    3. Re:Email the company's lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, fuck email. In the UK - at least, I assume the US is similar - every company has to provide a postal address of their head office on demand. It's a legal requirement (and I've got a company fined for failing to do just that while I was complaining about something else). Emails go to an underling that sits in front of an inbox and spam folder all day. Letters are verifiable proof-of-receipt and instantly admissible in court and undeniable if you send by a recorded delivery.

      The objective isn't to bring a lawsuit, it's to get your problem resolved, preferably with as little expense to you as possible. A politely worded email to the company's registered agent (the individual that is deemed responsible for legal correspondence in their state incorporation documents) *will* get their attention, especially if forthcoming registered postal correspondence is implied. If you get no response, then sure, go ahead and send a certified/registered letter to the agent so you can prove later on that you attempted to resolve the situation outside the courtroom. If you have that proof in hand and the company still isn't making things right, it's pretty much a slam-dunk in small-claims court at that point because it's almost a foregone conclusion that they won't appear. Of course, collecting on a judgment is an entirely different matter...

    4. Re:Email the company's lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No gradmar erors? Brilliant!

    5. Re:Email the company's lawyer by pem · · Score: 1

      The objective isn't to bring a lawsuit, it's to get your problem resolved

      Exactly. Or it should be. One of my friends has a lot of bitterness towards his brother (and he's 54 and his brother is around 60). He simultaneously wants to fuck with his brother and never have to deal with him/think about him again. I keep telling him that it's one or the other...

      In any case, before you send any correspondence, whether by post or email, you should be perfectly clear about your objectives, and they should be something that at least one other person besides you thinks is reasonable.

    6. Re:Email the company's lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been established that Michael Dell does actually read his email and has personally resolved or responded to several issues people have sent him.

  53. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep FUCK BETA!!!

    Didn't know how to give my opinion...

    Oh by the way, just we are not against it because it's new, and we don't like change. We just don't like ugly change. Same with windows 8, people don't hate it, because it's different. People hate it because it's terrible to use, and looks ugly too...

    I want something new, that's easier to use, faster, or more features, or looks better... Not change for change....

    That might be so, but as someone who has been here almost since the beginning -- Slashdot community has always had a vocal negative reaction to change. I remember people here debating how stupid a thing mobile phones were, if they needed to call anyone they could use their landline, no need to change that. And when XP came we really hated it, the new UI and more, but 10 years later it is what many like to stick with. There are tons of examples like this. I think it might partly be that geeks invest more than others in how things are, so resist change.

  54. ok by luther349 · · Score: 1

    this is why a buy a asus rog. these things can run at full load and not overheat but i have seen plenty of knockoff gaming laptops overheat. also how long has it been sense you cleaned the thing. dust buildup on the heat sync and fans is murder for a laptops thermal control.

  55. Thanks for posting this as I was about to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a new laptop crossing this of the list. Who am I kidding Now you know why Dell was already off my list.
    The list of reasons not to buy a Dell is long the universe can not even hold it.

  56. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    well then. If you don't like slashdot anymore, then please join us, currently at http://soylentnews.org/ (which will be up in few hours). Tomorrow we will start collecting suggestions for a new name for altslashdot. People will have one week to submit suggestions for a new name. Then we will have voting. If you are really an old timer, then you would know Bruce Perens. He is very excited to be working with us.

  57. Some options . . . by dogsbreath · · Score: 2

    One option is what you did here on /. . . . but in a planned campaign that includes getting the VLC org on your side.

    Another is civil (small claims) court. No lawyer necessary and guaranteed to cost Dell more than you if they fight it. You are very likely to get a judgement on your side if Dell doesn't send a representative. You can have oodles of fun serving the judgement on Dell. I have gone to civil court twice and both times the judge was very good.

    In Alberta: http://www.albertacourts.ab.ca...

    A bit of a windmill tilt since after all is said and done you could easily replace the speakers yourself for much less.

    Your local state/provincial/federal government is bound to have a consumer affairs section which has an interest in making sure businesses treat consumers fairly. You could look into that.

    Finally, go around the service desk if you can. See if you can make contact with someone other than a scripted service droid.

    I had an HP inkjet that would not pick up paper no matter what I did. I had several trouble calls in with them while it was under warranty but nothing helped so I tossed the offender into the closet and got on with my life. About a year later (outside of the warranty) I happened to read online about a service kit from HP that would cure the problem. Free under warranty. Called HP up and you know they said too bad, so sad, your warranty has expired. They would sell the kit for $40 bucks plus shipping. Half the cost of the printer. I protested about my trouble calls and they said the tickets were no longer in the system.

    On the off chance, I sent an email explaining my situation to the HP CEO as firstname.lastname@hp.com. Expecting nothing, I was floored when the next day I received a response from HP apologizing for the situation and that a kit plus a set of ink cartridges were being shipped to me.

    I am sure that the email did not go to the CEO of the time (uh, about 8 yrs ago so ...) but someone read the mail and dealt with it.

    Nice, but I wasted at least 40 hours on the issue. Wayyyyyyyyyyy more value than the printer. I shudda just thrown the darn thing out at the first sign of trouble.

    How upset are you? How much are you prepared to put into it.

    Have fun.

  58. Re: Join the slashdot farewell: by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

    How about me? :)

  59. Re:Small Claims + Other Options by Oysterville · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but the BBB will not help you. It's a front controlled by the businesses that they pretend to police.

  60. Re: Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citations needed.

  61. Small court may cut it by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    Here's how it works. Call the BBB & all those guys, even tell Dell beforehand if you want to, just don't say anything stupid. Once all that happens, you can clearly say you've explored all avenues EXCEPT for a court appearance. THeir lawyers will either settle with you or bring you in but all you gotta do is point out a few technical concepts for the courtrom, maybe include a few Simple Wikipedia printouts, & you'll win hands down. It would help to have someone in IT act as a professional witness. If the laptop was under $500, take them to small claim court.

  62. Would we crash their email server? by aynoknman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Would we crash their email server?)

    Not after the beta

    --
    We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
  63. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

    That may very well be the case (it is), but it doesn't change the fact that Dell had a responsibility to ensure that its speakers aren't capable of producing a sound that would cause them to damage themselves. Dell should have simply dialed back the amplifier, such that ANY signal produced by the computer would be below the rated maximum. Given that Dell has full control over the amount of power being used to drive the speakers, they have no excuse for throwing too much at them.

  64. No dell for me by SSSnakys · · Score: 1

    I love VLC and use it all the time. But I've needed to use it with the volume up to 100% let alone 200%. The fact that Dell could void a warranty just because of an installed software (even though that software is not the cause of the problem) is reason enough for me to avoid purchasing anything from them.

  65. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by Alsee · · Score: 1

    You're missing something important here.

    Lets say a recording has volume numbers 01210.
    Amplifying (doubling) that would give you 02420.
    If the maximum hardware volume is 2 then the software clips it to 02220. (The 4 gets reduced to 2.)
    The important point here is that a music file could have had 02220 in the first place!

    Most music files won't have 02220 because it sounds like crap. But a music file can have 02220, and there do exist music files that have 02220.

    So this has absolutely nothing to do with the software - the issue is that the Dell speakers get damaged if you play certain sound files! A sound system that damages itself when you play certain music files is clearly defective hardware. The only way that the software is involved is that it makes "common" music files look like those "rare" types of music files which trigger the hardware problem.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  66. Uhm.. everyone forget about clipping? by log0n · · Score: 1

    VLC doesn't compress output when you increase gain and setting the volume in VLC above 100% is increasing gain. Increasing gain introduces clipping. Clipping starts hitting an amplifiers peak wattage (vs rated) and peak wattage will damage speakers. Paraphrasing the developer, it's embiggening the waveform which can easily destroy hardware.

    Turn up some music in VLC above 100% and you'll start getting crackling and awful digital distortion. That clipping pushed out through any speakers (let alone tiny laptop speakers) will start damaging sooner or later.

  67. Re: Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me too!

  68. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't speak for this old timer. Stop bloody ruining every thread with your immature anti-beta posts.

    Your low user ID doesn't mean shit to me or anyone else with a brain, so
    take that pretentious bullshit to someone who might care, like maybe your mother.

    Beta sucks, the MAJORITY HAVE SPOKEN.

    If you don't like the protests, tough shit, you can leave.

  69. Polka time! by BlazingATrail · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the same thing happens with blown speaker and Dell finds your stash of Polka music .mp3 on the HDD. Dell will deny all claims because that speakers and ears are not designed for that kind of music.

  70. Re: Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or us that never sign up for things we don't have to since we understand the issues with technology and identity. News for nerds apparently.

  71. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    You don't speak for this old timer. Stop bloody ruining every thread with your immature anti-beta posts.

    First they ignore you...

  72. Re:Tell them... by LookIntoTheFuture · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you realize that the "fuck beta" comments are already much more annoying than the actual beta?

    Fuck "fuck beta" comments.

    How should people voice their displeasure with the potential death of Slashdot?

    --
    Brave Sir Robin ran away. ("No!") Bravely ran away away. ("I didn't!")
  73. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by mechanicaladvantage · · Score: 1

    That sums up my situation. UID is a rough guide, not an absolute measure.

  74. magic words by Tom · · Score: 1

    There are magic words that you can use when dealing with vendors and service providers who are unhelpful.

    One of them is "lawyer". However, like all magic, there are certain rules to the ritual to make it work well. In this case, it's not black candles and a goat, but the word being in the letterhead on the official letter paper of an actual lawyer.

    An actual letter from an actual lawyer not to the customer service but to the legal department will get a dramatically different treatment. So have your friend or neighbour who happens to be a lawyer write one as a favour in exchange for you having fixed his WiFi last month or whatever.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  75. Re:Tell them... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    How should people voice their displeasure with the potential death of Slashdot?

    They have voiced it already and the engineer team is working on the fixes. Let's be fair and give them some time now. If there is still something to say, do it in the Slashdot Blog or send e-mail to feedback@slashdot.org with the subject "beta_feedback". Littering the article comments with "fuck beta" is not going to help.

  76. Step one by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Contact your countries consumer protection agencies.

  77. I posted my experience online by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    My Dell's hard drive crashed after a few days or weeks so I posted my experience on my web site, and here. Some second level guy read about it and sent me an external drive as a token. Ultimately I was sufficiently mollified by this that I even bought another Dell a few years later -- Inspiron 530 Q6600 -- still using it. Looks like XP is going to outlast /.

    --
    I come here for the love
  78. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by KiloByte · · Score: 2

    Sounding like crap has never stopped record companies before. It's the loudness war.

    Thus, there's little VLC can do as the signal is already compressed up the wazoo.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  79. if you had got a Macbook instead of being cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could've brought to the Apple Store and walked out with a new one same day.

  80. Re:Tell them... by deconfliction · · Score: 1

    I agree that the F.B. information warfare[1] campaign here has been juvenile. But an on topic instance of the decreased beta features is this- I recently made this comment, which the pre-beta interface allows me to direct link[2] to for convenience-

    "
    > Overloading a system by running it as hard as ...

    Not that I'm accusing Lennart Poettering of cyberwarfare, but a highly relevant anecdote is that when pulseaudio was first thrust upon me in fedora, I and many(?) others discovered that it was only software that was preventing our PC's audio out from being overdriven to the point of health and property risk. I discovered this as my volume, due to bug, instantaneously jumped to 400% as I had my sony earbuds in listening to music. The result was excruciating ear pain for the duration of time (about half a second) it took my body to react and rip the earbuds out of my ears. I wonder (not enough to experiment) what would have happened if my speakers had been connected. It would have certainly taken me more than half a second to cause things to stop, and I'm guessing permanent damange to my speakers may have occurred.

    Of course, I'm not sure how expensive it would have been for sony to have put a safety in the earbuds. Still, quite the educational experience that was precisely illustrative of what you described, but in a more personal non-industrial sort of way.
    "

    [1] http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3156485&cid=41530745
    [2] http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4741383&cid=46132559
    [3] http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4766259&cid=46193879

  81. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Camshaft_90 · · Score: 0

    Yes. The anti-beta nimrods can not leave soon enough. I like beta. I wish I had mod points. Mod ernest up please. The signal/noise ratio will drop and the IQ is bound to go up after the tard's leave.

    --
    JH
  82. BBB and Attorney General by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I've had 100% success with companies trying to stiff me by writing to the BBB and the Attorney General of the state the company was incorporated in.

    Sometimes the letters back in response to the Attorney General are really funny. Basically they are bowing and scraping. Tinged with a definite aura of fear of God.

    It's easy too. Most states have web sites for consumer complaints you can submit the the AG's office.

    It works. Try it.

  83. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck beta

  84. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by fatphil · · Score: 0

    Ignore everything you just read on wikipedia, what you quoted isn't just wrong, it's 180 degrees wrong. A gently-ramped up signal that sits at the maximum value forever and a day and then gently ramps down has the *maximum area possible* under it, and yet is one of the safest waveforms to play to a driver.

    Boycott Dell. Boycott slashdot. 23:23 here - I'm outahere, no other stories look interesting.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  85. Re:Tell them... by Alsee · · Score: 0

    Simple solution, stop browsing at -1 and you won't have to see the "Fuck Beta" comments.
    And then we won't have to see your "fuck 'fuck beta'" comments.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  86. Re:Tell them... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

    I don't recall very many people who hated XP. There was a rather small cadre who were very loyal to W2K, but few even of those hated XP. Like your brother AC says, "Citations needed."

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  87. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by mc6809e · · Score: 0

    Because the clipped waveform has more area underneath it than the smaller unclipped waveform, the amplifier produces more power than its rated (sine wave) output when it is clipping.

    Which is why a designer shouldn't assume the amplifier is going to just produce a sine wave.

  88. Re: Small Claims + Other Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only businesses that advertise great bbb ratings are sketchy ones with skeletons to hide. I avoid any business that advertises their bbb rating.

  89. of the minor issues with dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not forget: https://www.google.com/url?q=http://rt.com/usa/dell-appelbaum-30c3-apology-027/&sa=U&ei=bPf3UvX9D4byyAGiwIGICg&ved=0CA0QFjAB&sig2=RZcN_Ck62PU5g-Th6XudNg&usg=AFQjCNFOQd_iGo4h3DvFScq45cv_5iAChw

  90. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by dk20 · · Score: 1

    No mod points, but agree with you 100%.

    Cant really read the posts anymore as they are just full of immature "f-beta" posts.

    Most are AC's so you can just set the filter to +1 and get rid of most of them.

    They probably know they are ruining the site, but dont care as their big "win" will be that their feedback is incorporated regardless of the inconvenience they caused everyone else.

  91. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by dk20 · · Score: 2

    Then they set a filter to get rid of most of you?

    Seriously, posting anti-beta threads on EVERY post is just annoying everyone else. I would guess that they have read your immature posts already?

  92. Is VLC setting output knob to "11"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure that VLC doesn't set the output to "11". That will defintely blow the speaker.

    BTW: Fuck the Beta. Boycott begins at 00:00 Hours UTC Feb. 10th, Lasts for exactly 1 week. Starts 2 hours from NOW.

    Fuck the Beta!
    Fuck the BETa!
    Fuck the BETA!

  93. filtering by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A high quality sound system should be able to filter out such harmonics.
    A very well designed sound system should be able to take any possible wave form, and play it without destroying anything in the process.
    It's possible to filter out unwanted harmonics, etc.

    The problem? Such a system would cost a few more bucks and laptop manufacturers are racing to the bottom for prices.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:filtering by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Such a system would cost a few more cents, because it's just a matter of the right rating of filtering capacitor, but even a couple of cents adds up when you're shipping thousands of units...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  94. Plausible, but unlikely by supersat · · Score: 1

    If you increase VLC's gain too high, it will begin to clip the audio signal (just like anything else would). Speakers do not like clipping. While VLC's volume control makes it easier to distort audio files than, say, Windows Media Player, Dell really should have some hardware protection in place. In this case, it sounds like the speakers were under-spec'ed with respect to the audio amp. Sounds like a design flaw to me!

  95. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by transporter_ii · · Score: 2

    I have been reading slashdot since about 1999-2000.

    I've been a user since 1996-1997. Fuck Beta. The most obvious thing is they don't seem to give a shit about our feelings. I'm sorry you are getting annoyed, but it won't be long before we won't have to worry about anything in the comments, because there won't be any comments any more. It's like sitting with a dying relative. You see death coming, but there really isn't anything that is going to stop it. Sucks, but Fuck Beta.

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  96. Re:Tell them... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    That might be so, but as someone who has been here almost since the beginning -- Slashdot community has always had a vocal negative reaction to change.

    That's probably because so many here have seen so many projects destroyed or greatly damaged by change for change's sake, seeing so many applications inflicted with the "let's just change" meme and end up being far less usable than the previous version. Gnome 3, Windows 8, almost any version of MS office after 2003. Now we get Slashdot Beta, which has no advantages and many many critical disadvantages over the current Slashdot system.

    Others have pointed out the "when XP came we really hated it" as being false. Sure, a few people might have said "man, I just want to stick with ME," but most people, Slashdotters included, saw it as a great improvement. Same with the transition from Vista to 7. Same with the mobile phones -- that wasn't greatly panned either.

  97. Flip the argument around by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    If they are claiming that software can modify a basic physical property like the power output of an amplifier, then simply go into your screen settings, put them manual and select a larger screen than you actually have. When the laptop's monitor fails to stretch before your eyes, return the whole thing as being defective.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  98. Re:Tell them... by Rakarra · · Score: 0

    They have voiced it already and the engineer team is working on the fixes.

    It needs a lot more than fixes. At the moment there's nothing worth salvaging from the current beta, as point for point it's inferior to the current site. I'm willing to give them more time and see what they come up, but at the moment there's no reason to think it's going to get appreciably better, just as none of the major problems have been fixed since the beta's unveiling several months ago. Most of the people who hate the beta just want the site to be left alone, since they can see it only going downhill.

  99. BBB, Attorney General's Office by foeclan · · Score: 1

    When I was having issues with my Alienware and their support stopped being helpful, I contacted the Better Business Bureau and the Florida Attorney General's Office (where Alienware was based at the time, not sure if they'd been fully acquired by Dell at the time). Soon thereafter I received a call to arrange for a 'please don't sue us' replacement laptop that worked fine for years after.

  100. Mac fanboys are like flat-earthers, it seems..... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    If I wanted a/an mediocre spec.'d, over-priced, walled garden, ugly toy, then yes, I would get an Apple PC.(or any smart phone/tablet)

    Some of us actually have work to do, so we don't bother with Apple PC's.

    And before all of you Mac fanboys jump in here, I have used Apple computers before.(NOT by choice) I have made my choice, and nothing I have seen or heard lately contradicts my decision.

    I did however advised Mom to get one, and my 'tech support' to her has dwindled to almost nothing, but it is not the answer for everyone.

    They(Apple) may have good customer service/support, but that's only valuable to a customer if the device is suited to the intended use of said device. If not, then the best support/service in the universe will not fix the problem for the customer.

    I'm glad you are happy with your Mac(as with Mom), but it is NOT a 'one size fits all' solution to every problem.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  101. Re: Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe all the FB comments are coming from one poster... and it is none other than Mark Zuckerberg. Who else stands to benefit from the beta-induced exodus of users from slashdot to Facebook?

  102. Re: Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying fuck Fuck Beta? You know, that's pretty meta.

  103. Re:Tell them... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Yo dawg...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  104. Re:Tell them... by dryeo · · Score: 1

    I remember lots of hate towards the "fisher price" themed interface and lots of hatred towards XP phoning home to be validated with many people planning on sticking with 2K.
    Perhaps it is just confirmation bias with those hating XP noticing agreeing posts and those thinking of it as a step forward noticing posts that agreed with their viewpoint.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  105. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An ID close to a million doesn't make you an old timer. Thinking it does certainly makes you an idiot.

  106. Dell are now officially on my DontBuyNaughtyStep by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    If you want to see who else is on it, you may go to: http://thewikiman.allsup.co/Do...

    --
    John_Chalisque
  107. fuck the anti-fuck-betas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    beta is no better now than it was before. The protests must continue. When entrenchment happens, both sides lose force. The side the loses less usually wins. Don't listen to anyone but your own inner voice when you're protesting. Continue.

  108. welp by jjeffries · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't have turned it up to 11!

  109. VLC and amplification by Trogre · · Score: 1

    This is a problem with VLC. I often hear from people who tell me their music is sounding distorted, with them blaming their speakers or the source content.

    In nearly every case the culprit is rapidly found to be the rainbow volume slider in VLC set to above 100%, and the music undergoind severe clipping as a result.

    Now over-driving beyond 100% is actually a useful feature for some particularly quiet source content, so props to VLC devs for having that option, but for goodness sake it should not be a seamless part of the Volume control!

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  110. Re:Tell them... by gnoshi · · Score: 1

    And nothing of value was lost. Bye.

    Said the infant to the adult.
    I'm looking forward to the boycott so I can enjoy Slashdot without having to swim through whiny comments for a week.

  111. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why anyone with actual balls is boycotting Slashdot from Feb 10-17.

    Indeed. It must take tremendous courage to stay away from a web site. I mean, while the rest of us are held here against our will, oppressed, downfallen, the truly brave and courageous have the intestinal fortitude to stay away.

  112. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I go to the new site and everything isn't set up just the way I want it, then I can shitstorm the entire site endlessly until I get my way? I'm just asking because I want to know the ground rules going in.

  113. dumb fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the dumb fuck who bought a Dell POS.

  114. XP doesn't allow hardware access either by localroger · · Score: 1

    The 16-bit Windows -- 3.x, 95, 98, and ME -- allow DOS style direct hardware access for things like sound and serial hardware. The Windows NT derivatives including NT, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, and 8 do not allow application program access to hardware at all due to the underlying security model.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  115. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reddit is what I wished slashdot would have been in 1998-99.

    The threading model in beta is a fucking joke. Digg did a better job and look at where they're at forcing horrible changes on their users.

    For example, I've got to wait 3 minutes before posting again. Laughable. I've long since forgotten my old username (why bother). When they did the re-uid (you remember that right?) I had a 4 digit one (which I thought was high for the time, you know, street cred).

  116. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by RedBear · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm missing something but isn't the entire point of the fuckbeta campaign to ruin the experience of coming here, to demonstrate to the idiots in charge of Slashdot that their website is worthless without our cooperative participation and contributions? By doing your best to quell our political dissent it could be said that it is you who are collaborating with Dice to flush our mutually favorite website down the toilet of corporate mediocrity.

    The one last desperate chance we have to save this site (such as it is) is to destroy it, at least temporarily. I apologize for inconveniencing you during our brief struggle with corporate greed/stupidity.

    And no, I will not hide behind anonymity.

    Hopefully it's going to get real quiet in here in about twelve hours and you and your fellow collaborators can feel free to get together and blow smoke up each other's butts and pretend nothing is wrong in the resulting echo chamber.

    Fuck beta, and boycott Slashdot Feb. 10th to 17th.

  117. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New campaign. Fuck ernest.cunningham.

  118. You may be on to something by laing · · Score: 1

    Dell went private with a lot of help from Microsoft ($2G). Perhaps this all comes down to an anti-OSS policy mandate.

  119. WHAT IS THIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A SItE FOR ThE VISUaLLY IMpAIREd? I WEAR GLAssES, SO THIS IS HELpFUl.

  120. Re: Join the slashdot farewell: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't know why you got modded insightful. your comment is just as off topic as the beta busters, except you got modded + 5, so i started to read it.
    Thanks for wasting my time while whining like a old man. Did it ever occur to you that beta man is trying to help you? Just like Obama. you don't see obama using the beta. you can't have it both ways.

  121. Moral of the story by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    So I guess the moral of this story is to uninstall any non-Windows-Media-Player sound applications before sending laptops in for warranty work.

  122. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    BUCK FATE.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  123. Re:Join the slashdot farewell: by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Want to know what my user ID thinks is pretentious? A bunch of obnoxious rabble coming along after some bloody years, presuming to tell me what my Slashdot experience should be like, and inviting me to sod off if I don't like their circle-jerking group troll.

    BUCK FATE.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  124. Re: Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The boycott is supposed to have started already.

  125. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by sjames · · Score: 1

    And that's why you use a bandpass audio filter to reject infra and ultrasound and then select a speaker with adequate margin.

  126. Slashcott! by LaminatorX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This site used to be great. Even in it's latter days, it's been good. That is poised to change. Before long, it will be mediocre, and ordinary.

    I didn't see a problem when Dice Holdings initially bought Slashdot. I figured there would be efforts to drive nerd traffic towards their job listings and such. That was fine. We all need jobs.

    Things have changed now. Beyond the shifts in story choices, the slashvertisements, and so on, something fundamental has changed: Slashdot's owners do not appreciate it.

    Their recent financials show that they have written its value as an asset down to zero. They have legally claimed it to be worthless. That is at the root of what is happening now. They want to fundamentally change the nature of this site in order to remake it into something with big growth potential.

    Beta is just the latest symptom of this disease. It will not be the last. In striving to make it into a site that will bring them a growing user base and growing revenue per user, they have shown a willingness to dumb down the interface in the name of making it more accessible to newcomers, to cast aside essential elements of decade-spanning community culture, and to plow ahead with changes in the face of overwhelmingly negative user feedback.

    This is not going to change. This will not go away. I will not support it.

    I will be gone for this entire week, in protest. While away, I will work to create a new community where things can be run with quality user discussions as the paramount objective.

    Be seeing you.

    1. Re:Slashcott! by gig · · Score: 1

      There have never been quality user discussions on Slashdot. Not ever.

  127. Why are you buying Dell? by kawabago · · Score: 1

    That's the question.

  128. Dell is making up magic bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell is clearly making up magic bullshit. I've seen software replace ttl logic chips, but software can't make hardware do things that the hardware is incapable of doing. Example: can my software increase the speed of my computers cooling fans so that they act like a vacuum cleaner? No. There is a physical limitation. Software can 'ask' hardware to do things beyond its limits, but the physical limits "Physics" gets in the way. Its like a boss who asks you to do 200 hours worth of work in the next half hour. Ask away, we will try to accommodate, but in reality you get about 30 minutes worth of work done in a half hour. When I was in university, I told my house mates that in order to save time, instead of cooking chicken at 350 for an hour, you could cook the chicken at 3500 for 6 minutes, or 7000 for 3 minutes. I could 'ask' the oven for 7000, but it won't go past broil (600), and at that temperature, you scorch the outside and the inside is raw, and it doesn't work. Asking a speaker for 500% is like asking a football player for 110%. You can ask, but that damn reality keeps getting in the way. Oh, and Dell are cheap bastards. Sue em.

  129. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by adolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given that Dell has full control over the amount of power being used to drive the speakers, they have no excuse for throwing too much at them.

    That's a little bit short-sighted.

    Without knowing the nature of the failure, it's impossible to say what the problem actually is. Were the loudspeakers destroyed through mechanical stress or thermal stress?

    Limiting the power output of an amplifier for the purpose of preventing loudspeaker damage is not a trivial thing to do.

    In terms of damage, loudspeakers don't care (within reason and obvious mechanical limits) about instantaneous power. They care about long-term heating.

    If you just clip the signal, you generate an approximation of a squarewave (which loudspeakers hate): This reduces peak power (which isn't normally a problem), and increases average power (which is always a problem), and reduces cooling, AND it sounds terrible (though some listeners seem to not care). Clipping, therefore, at any stage -- including within software (ala VLC), or even during the recording process -- is a problem.

    If you add a simple limiter, you've got the same problems all over again, although with less harmonic distortion: Peak power goes down, but average power stays high. Voice coils cook.

    If you add a complicated multiband limiter that understands heating, you might have a shot at solving it, but you're into real money in engineering dollars and DSP parts....over some $.50 laptop speakers.

    That all said, companies have been selling and folks have been buying integrated audio systems for well over half a decade. If this is 1949 and I crank up my RCA tube set so I can listen to music in the garden and cook the loudspeaker, that's my fault -- not RCA's fault. The best I can hope is that RCA is willing to sell me a replacement speaker at a reasonable price.

    Same with a 1980s Fisher "rack system," or a wall full of modern Krell and Martin Logan gear. Or any random boombox. And, I dare say, a laptop.

    It is traditionally the job of the listener to ensure that an audio system is performing within its limitations, and not the job of the audio system to protect itself from the listener.

    If I crank VLC up to 120 or 200% or whatever the maximum is, and it starts clipping samples and generating square waves, and I turn the other volume controls up so I can hear that distorted drone over the drone of my hot tub, and something breaks...gosh, I guess I'm going to say that it was my own fault for not hearing the plain and obvious distortion that was occurring, and you know, just turn things down. Just as with any other audio system, big or small.

    Back to legal stuff: The Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act does not protect consumers from their own stupidity. If I drop my Jeep down a 4-foot embankment and break a front control arm, that's my own dumb fault -- it's certainly not the manufacturer's fault for failing to ensure that I would be unable to perform such maneuvers in MY Jeep (yes, emphasis: If I owned a Jeep, it would be MINE).

    HOWEVER, what MMWA does do is ensure that if the manufacturer suspects that a failure is due to end-user modification, that the the onus is on the manufacturer to prove that this is the case. I can be rock-crawling in my Jeep with its trick aftermarket suspension, and if the engine dies from a broken pushrod, it's the manufacturer's responsibility to prove that it's either not a warranted fault OR that my modifications caused the pushrod to break.

    Likewise, the onus is on Dell to prove that some software (such as VLC) caused the failure...or that the speakers aren't warranted to begin with due to signs of abuse. Dismissing a warranty claim out-of-hand because of the software installed on a computer, or the shocks on a Jeep (even IF it might be the case that the software did in fact cause the problem, as VLC might be capable of doing) is illegal in all 50 states.

  130. Then buy a mac by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    but what if you want a usable keyboard and mouse?

    Apple keyboards are some of the best around.

    You can use any USB mouse with a Mac, but the laptop trackpads actually work extremely well unlike any mouse replacement I have ever used on a PC laptop. They work so well, that along with my external keyboard I use an external trackpad with the mac. Gestures are way better than a scroll-wheel.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Then buy a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple keyboards are now garbage. No page up and down keys and the arrow keys are in an awkward place.

    2. Re:Then buy a mac by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Don't know what you're talking about - the current keyboard I have (Apple - bought last year) has normal arrow keys and the standard block of 6 keys above them. I even have the standard num pad on the right. Perhaps you just need to buy a non-specialty keyboard and stop complaining about what you didn't buy?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  131. Re:Small Claims + Other Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who uses laptop speakers anyways? If a nerd has an hourly wage of $30, and makes a 50 hours effort trying to force a corporation to honor a $50 warranty issue, assuming he wins out in the end, he is no the lucky owner of a $1500 3w speaker. Personally I've had a dell microphone fail. If i want to use skype, I just use a headset. The alternative would be several weeks of downtime, which is not an alternative at all. Not to belittle the OP, but if this is his biggest battle, I can already predict that he is not going to be a world changer.

  132. Hey bigmouth - step inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like calling folks idiots? Like this from you troll http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ??

    Prove me wrong dumbass http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    It works, & gives folks what they want here (no beta site redirect foisted on them without asking, which is WHY I put it up... they did it to me 1 or 2 times, that beat it, & I gave folks what they wanted).

    You're also FREE to *try* to disprove 17 points of FACT that use of custom hosts files gives users more speed, security, reliability, & even added anonymity that I list here where you can download it, free -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    (Only thing is, on the latter, that FAR more skilled trolls than you have TRIED to, only to get shot down in flames each time, by yours truly)

    APK

    P.S.=> Come on big talker - go for it: I'll eat you ALIVE here publicly jsut to laugh @ your DUMB ass even more...apk

  133. Hey bigmouth - step inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like calling folks idiots? Like this from you troll http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ??

    Prove me wrong dumbass http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    It works, & gives folks what they want here (no beta site redirect foisted on them without asking, which is WHY I put it up... they did it to me 1 or 2 times, that beat it, & I gave folks what they wanted).

    You're also FREE to *try* to disprove 17 points of FACT that use of custom hosts files gives users more speed, security, reliability, & even added anonymity that I list here where you can download it, free -> http://start64.com/index.php?o...

    (Only thing is, on the latter, that FAR more skilled trolls than you have TRIED to, only to get shot down in flames each time, by yours truly)

    APK

    P.S.=> Come on big talker - go for it: I'll eat you ALIVE here publicly jsut to laugh @ your DUMB ass even more...apk

  134. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't recall very many people who hated XP. There was a rather small cadre who were very loyal to W2K, but few even of those hated XP. Like your brother AC says, "Citations needed."

    XP Fisher Price

  135. Re: Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citations needed.

    XP Fisher Price

  136. Another reason to never buy Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell have a sordid history of denying warranty repair on flimsy pretexts (the bad caps fiasco had them invalidate warranty for using XPS systems as a "server"). Sounds like another lawsuit is the only way to get these guys to act reasonably. This problem is best avoided by not buying Dell. They either have cretins of scumbags working in their support and warranty department, either excuse is enough to avoid.

  137. Bye BYe by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    we won't miss you, its only the twats and old dogs who can;t learn new tricks going

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  138. won't you void the warrenty by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    by opening up the casing to replace the HDD?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    1. Re:won't you void the warrenty by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The HDD on most modern laptops has it's own cover that is not warranty sealed. Same goes for memory. This lets them offer more configurations of memory and HDD upgrades without having an exponential growth in stock sizes.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:won't you void the warrenty by icemanwol · · Score: 0

      In most cases removing the harddrive will not void the warranty because its a CRU part (Customer replaceable unit). There are SOME models that this would void your warranty on but on these models you usually have to remove the motherboard to access the harddrive...

  139. Shema Yisrael! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > It should be impossible for software to damage modern hardware.

    Yours claim has already been falsified since ancient times, when the walls of Jericho collapse to the tune of the jew's shofar horn.

    A simplified version of "hatikva.mid" is encoded in the Stuxnet worm binary, the thing that physically ruined Iran's uranium enriching ultra-centrifuges by hacking the Siemens S7 SCADA micro-controllers and making the drums spin out of control. Another variant of the Tilded cyber-weapon platform has AC/DC's Thunderstruck in its code.

  140. quality by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

    i bought a dell machine for quality. i went for the expensive 'developer edition' 13 inch xps with ubuntu preinstalled and regretted it the day after it arrived. buzzing capacitors, sound card that cracks at 1000dB when it suspends or resumes (that's a few seconds after every single sound), really flimsy power connector that has no chance of lasting more than a few months and a touch screen that sometimes just doesn't work after a suspend.

  141. Lame excuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    d) Add a power calculation and limiting circuit to the sound DSP
    e) Replace broken speakers and eat the cost as the cost of their shoddy engineering

  142. back that train up by JRV31 · · Score: 1

    In other words; buy a laptop from someone who actually makes laptops. Not some marketing firm that buys cheap off brand crap from China and sticks their name on it.

  143. Boycott? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this so-called boycott supposed to do given people are allowed to browse the site?

    1. Even when logged off, Slashdot can still correlate the IP addresses to your account.
    2. Look up the definition of "boycott".

  144. User twitter by DaWhilly · · Score: 1

    "#dell #sucks Dell won't fix my laptop under warranty because I used open source software." or "#dell #sucks #vlc Dell won't fix my laptop under warranty because I used VLC for media." Either one seems sufficient and complaining on Twitter seems to be where consumer complaints get the most visibility.

    1. Re:User twitter by DaWhilly · · Score: 1

      I actually, I recommend not adding "#vlc" to that second one. might be misinterpreted as VLC being the issue (when its the better media player)

  145. Re:Small Claims + Other Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BBB doesn't _do_ anything, but if you register a complaint with them it is publicly visible, and that makes a difference to some companies. We were having a terrible time with a phone we bought from Virgin mobile, and offshore support was being completely unhelpful. We wrote up everything that happened in a complaint filed with the BBB, and suddenly a nice lady based in the US called us. Rather than trying to go through basic troubleshooting and throwing up her hands when nothing helped, (as offshore support did on each and every call) she admitted that this was a known problem and gave us a timeframe when a fix would be available.

    We talked ourselves blue in the face with offshore support. (to no end) The only thing that got us actual customer support was the BBB complaint.

  146. Re: Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck "fuck beta" comments.

    No , fuck "Fuck Fuck beta" comments, they are the only ones I see anyhow. Everything else gets modded down in the natural order. I'm tired of reading all these anti-anti-beta posts, you aren't helping the situation (and neither am I).

  147. So you will only buy Dell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I had a problem with a dell computer in the past, and I would **never get any other** never again [emphasis added]

    So you bought a Dell computer in the past and had troubles with it. After that experience, you would never buy any other computer? I.e., you will only buy Dell?

    Such loyalty. :) If only Dell had more customers like you, Michael Dell would not have had to take his company private.

  148. Non-standard software? WTF is that? by sjbe · · Score: 2

    It's entirely possible the script has been updated to try and fuck you over if you ever use non-standard software on the PC

    What exactly is "non-standard software"? It's a general purpose computer so there is no such thing as non-standard applications unless we are talking complete operating system change.

  149. Sounds like the Chrysler Lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the Chrysler paint lawsuit where the company's representatives blamed the peeling problem on acid rain, and the judge responded by asking them why mother nature was selective in singling out only Chrysler vehicles...

  150. Re:Tell them... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    If they wanted to make changes why not just give us really good Unicode support.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  151. Re:Tell them... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    -1 is where /. comes alive.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  152. "allow larger power output" ??? by Quila · · Score: 1

    Some audio application like VLC player will allow large power output through speaker, approx 200% to 400% of original sound output.

    Dell provides an amplifier of a specific power output and matches it to speakers with a specific power rating. How can software drive that amplifier to push more than its maximum power?

  153. Re: winnows 7, 8 & Change by Xman73x · · Score: 0

    Nope Wins 98 second Edition to XP were the best the new Windows is now being aimed to the Younger Generation heck just look at Microsofts commercials today. I'm hoping Windows 9 is 100% better then today's same old concept Windows, 7,8 I don't know if they made 8.1 better then the previews version.

  154. Re:Small Claims + Other Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parent.mod++

    BBB only 'facilitates' communication with members. They do not police anyone. As long as a member responds to a complaint, even if it's just to tell you to fuck off, the complaint is considered settled and the member still has A+ standing.

  155. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you realize that the "fuck beta" comments are already much more annoying than the actual beta?

    Fuck "fuck beta" comments.

    Fuck 'Fuck "fuck beta"' comments.

    How should people voice their displeasure with the potential death of Slashdot?

    With fire?
    Come on someone has to know someone who can buy out Dice and basically do the same thing to them they are doing here. Gut it. Nothing is funnier than when a company that goes around gutting places gets gutted itself.

  156. Dell gear is disposable — buy another by gig · · Score: 1

    You got what you paid for: a disposable laptop. The way it works is you just buy another now. Or you get tired of it and get some Apple gear because that is the only manufacturer who hasn't switched to disposable laptops.

  157. Re:Tell them... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    With XP if you didn't like the UI changes you could turn them off. Activation was/is an annoyance but an annoyance that only comes up once every couple of years is easilly accepted/forgotten.

    Whereas with more recent versions of windows the UI changes have not been optional. Yes windows 7 has a classic theme but that just makes the UI look sorta like older versions, it doesn't make it behave like them.

    Also a lot of people upgrading to XP were not coming from 2K but from 9x which keeled over under heavy load.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  158. Re:Tell them... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Fuck "fuck beta" comments.

    How should people voice their displeasure with the potential death of Slashdot?

    How about by not destroying the thing which you want to preserve, which is Slashdot's user base and moderations system.

    so you are one of the 25% who've been asked to look at "beta", and you've decided to use the experience to ruin the site for the rest of us. Like, thanks man. If I find myself fucking off to avoid "fuck beta trolls" like you, I'm sure that'll make you so happy in your denuded and shrunken rump of Slashdot.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  159. User screw-up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect from a bunch of cheap speakers, when you crank-up the volume? Blaming it on the software, went out when the day after "the dog ate my homework."

    Use some common sense. Oh, I forgot. You must be a low-information Obama voter.

  160. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by hambone142 · · Score: 1

    Actually, "the volume goes to eleven". (sorry, I just couldn't resist interjecting this).

  161. Re: Tell them... by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

    Amen to that! What's the op done to any of the F.B. trolls? The op has asked a genuine question which deserves an answer but do these trolls care? Nope. All that matters to them is what they want. Show some consideration to the op and help them out if you can otherwise go fucking troll another thread!

  162. Trade Standards Institute by i.kazmi · · Score: 1

    You could possibly get in touch with the Trade Standards Institute in your country. I know from personal experience with the Trade Standards Institute, UK that getting in touch with them gets you some excellent advice and telling the trader what they told you usually gets the trader to accept responsibility.

  163. Re: Tell them... by kbx911 · · Score: 0

    Lelz, too funny,.intestinal fortitude, lelz

  164. The court system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Small court maybe your friend. Find your local TV statoin trouble shooter.

    But legal matters and news make companies move, if they are actually carried through.

  165. Re:Tell them... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    How should people voice their displeasure with the potential death of Slashdot?

    They have voiced it already and the engineer team is working on the fixes. Let's be fair and give them some time now. If there is still something to say, do it in the Slashdot Blog or send e-mail to feedback@slashdot.org with the subject "beta_feedback". Littering the article comments with "fuck beta" is not going to help.

    It's the only thing that will have an impact otherwise it's "Will you please direct your complaints to that brick wall over there". The proper channels were used, ignored and they tried to roll it out anyway. Notice how only a day or two after the fuck beta thing started they had an announcement story on.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  166. Another Dell story by Mondor · · Score: 1

    I've got two Dell laptops - both are Vostro V131. One of them had numerous hardware problems soon after the purchase - the hard drive died and left button of touch pad stopped working. When I've contacted the support, they basically told me, that I've stolen my laptop.

    I forgot to mention - I bought my laptop from my company, which is an official Dell distributor. It was absolutely new, no questions about that, in a never opened box.

    Well, when the support "tech" guy asked for my company name, I said that this notebook is my own, no company assigned. Nope, - he said - try again.
    And I tried - the company that actually sold me the notebook. No luck. In the end, he just said that there is no warranty for a notebook if I can't prove that it's mine. However, there is no way to show them the invoice or something, they simply play the game of "guess which company name I have in my head".

    After that, I tried the same with second Dell notebook. I've got it from another shop a few months before. Although I had no problems with it, I just wanted to see if I have the warranty. You guess right - the company is not correct.

    If I am able to learn from my mistakes, I will never have Dell again.

    P.S. Just got my new laptop. It's Lenovo.

  167. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by smhsmh · · Score: 1

    Protecting against thermal burnout doesn't require expensive DSP algorithms. The audio drivers could come close by simply maintaining a time-decayed value of the recent audio sample delta. Easy to compute. The time constant would be something a little faster than the rate a which the speaker can dump heat to the environment. That computation would track fairly closely the power dissipation (heat) in the speaker, and when unsafely high, the driver should stop and flag some sort of error popup.

  168. Camera by phorm · · Score: 1

    Yeah, my father had a similar issue. His camera developed a crack that spread across the screen.
    It was in the case and never dropped. The only explanation we could figure was that it actually got hot in the case which aggravated a minute flaw in the glass (I had a similar thing happen once with glasses left in a hot car, and this was summer).

    Unfortunately any "cracked screen" issue generally gets blamed on user abuse, and there's little recourse that doesn't cost more than the item (attending claims court isn't "free" if one has to take time off work), which is what these companies bank on.

    "Water damage" is also a claim similarly abused on both ends.

  169. Clipped waveforms by phorm · · Score: 1

    A "clipped" waveform also tends to sound like distorted crap. It's not really likely somebody is going to listen to horribly clipped audio long enough to damage a speaker (exempting idiots in crappy small cars with idiotically oversized woofers), unless the endurance of said speaker is terribly low to begin with.

    In addition, Dell is denying the warranty based on the EXISTENCE of the VLC software on the machine, not any proof that it was used to produce clipped audio and damage the speaker. I know a lot of people that use VLC because it can open pretty much everything (including other-region DVD's), not because of the ability to pump up audio.

  170. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by adolf · · Score: 1

    Right. Good work, son.

    Now come back and see me when you have a solution that can profitably be applied to $0.50 laptop speakers.

  171. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by smhsmh · · Score: 1

    What I proposed was software. The implementation would be entirely in the driver SOFTWARE, not the speaker HARDWARE drivers.

    Sorry about the ambiguity.

  172. Re:A "clipped" audio signal is still a valid signa by adolf · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that violate the basic theory of "software cannot cause hardware problems"?

    Drivers can be changed. Operating systems get reinstalled or change completely.

    And then we're back to warranty SNAFU....

  173. Re:Tell them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With XP, if you didn't like the UI changes you could turn them off, but XP would still insist on using 190 MB more RAM than a W2K system doing the same tasks. It was bloated garbage, the fact that computers were forced to catch up to its bloat didn't make it a better system. W2K ran well with 32 MB of memory, XP ran sort of OK with 256MB.

    Why do we need 2GB of memory to run our operating system now? Why does the average PC come with 6GB of RAM when the average user just surfs facebook?

  174. UCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Uniform Commercial Code, Addresses merchant fraud. It allows for treble damages to be awarded against a merchant that refuses to honor it's warranties. Just go small claims with a valid estimate from Dell, ON PAPER.!!!!! Triple it and also ask for filing and any other fees you have paid to serve the suit.