"Many years later, in 2007, Steve Jobs introduced us to the iPhone. Despite all the hype though, the iPhone was not a new invention - it was just a much better telephone than any we'd seen before."
"What Apple achieved with the first iPhone was truly groundbreaking, but it was the result of very clever innovation, with existing technologies applied in new ways. It was not a new invention."
He doesn;t seem to say here that its a new invention, just a better version of an old invention using existing components
Blackberry have "Balance". Can Andriod/iOS split work/user data and keep both secure and separate and can a remote delete of data only delete work stuff?
"End users do not want to give up *any* control over their devices. "
with the new BB Z10 and BB Balance, the users will not lose any control except of work related data/apps which needs to be secure especially in the finance arena.
One thing missing is a secure split of apps and data on the same device. BB Balance (on paper) would appear to be the only real secure solution in the BYOD arena. remotely wipe ONLY the work data/apps, not allow copying of data from work to home are just a couple of "missing" elements on Driod/iOS
you should be in your work mode during the day and only check personal stuff at lunchtime - are you one of those that should be allowed to play with facebook during work hours???
if its a good app that works then there should be no support. whats your name? (so i can avoid any apps you write as its seems you need to do a lot of support):o)
They might just do that with the "Balance" feature if they already have a BES in the corporation. If you didn;t know, it allows 2 user environments on the device, home and work. The work is controlled by the corp (apps and data), all work data is encrypted and you can't copy it to the home user. i think it creates more security for a corp that Andriod or iOS could even wish for.
They might do well with the 2 mode operation of business and home login in this new climate of BYOD. The company can still control the business/apps use and keep the data separate and safe, they can wipe all the data etc off the device if the person leaves the company. I don't know if Android or iOS can separate work and home use in this manner
its not possible to have one with NRA supporters, its like arguing with a drunk or fundamental religionist, pointless as they they wouldn't change their mind in the face of evidence.
"Description of 'correct' is carried through centuries with the help of religion. That's the most important part of the religion, that it creates a foundation of moral thoughts." -
Moral?? religion?? you have to be joking. Misogyny, homophobia, genocide, child abuse are "correct" ??
"Even if all these religious sayings, and prophets etc. were man-made, not god-made, " - they are man made
"someone considering himself clever enough, should respect them. " - No, i should not respect them, how can anyone respect the greatest con (albiet created due to ignorance of facts) on earth
"See, the problem is not US religions telling people how to live or banning things"
its religions reason to exist - telling people how to live, who to have sex with etc.... the "liberals" are probably more aligned to the good bits of religion that the fundamentalists in that they want to cater for all rather than the church's view who only cater for themselves
"Atheism, not religion, is the real force behind the mass murders of history" - absolute bollox, not one war was done in the name of atheism. plenty of killing done using various holy texts as justification
Slashdot Mirror
"Many years later, in 2007, Steve Jobs introduced us to the iPhone. Despite all the hype though, the iPhone was not a new invention - it was just a much better telephone than any we'd seen before."
"What Apple achieved with the first iPhone was truly groundbreaking, but it was the result of very clever innovation, with existing technologies applied in new ways. It was not a new invention."
He doesn;t seem to say here that its a new invention, just a better version of an old invention using existing components
Blackberry have "Balance". Can Andriod/iOS split work/user data and keep both secure and separate and can a remote delete of data only delete work stuff?
"End users do not want to give up *any* control over their devices. "
with the new BB Z10 and BB Balance, the users will not lose any control except of work related data/apps which needs to be secure especially in the finance arena.
One thing missing is a secure split of apps and data on the same device. BB Balance (on paper) would appear to be the only real secure solution in the BYOD arena. remotely wipe ONLY the work data/apps, not allow copying of data from work to home are just a couple of "missing" elements on Driod/iOS
true but it won't be as big a problem as you think if its well written and tested.
you should be in your work mode during the day and only check personal stuff at lunchtime - are you one of those that should be allowed to play with facebook during work hours???
i'm glad screens are getting bigger, more chance of bigger physical keys. 3 BB models would be great, no kb, full kb and slide kb.
if its a good app that works then there should be no support. whats your name? (so i can avoid any apps you write as its seems you need to do a lot of support) :o)
a dick head
yep, but i'd prefer it be the Torch version so you can still get a bigger screen but alas its not.
They might just do that with the "Balance" feature if they already have a BES in the corporation. If you didn;t know, it allows 2 user environments on the device, home and work. The work is controlled by the corp (apps and data), all work data is encrypted and you can't copy it to the home user. i think it creates more security for a corp that Andriod or iOS could even wish for.
They might do well with the 2 mode operation of business and home login in this new climate of BYOD. The company can still control the business/apps use and keep the data separate and safe, they can wipe all the data etc off the device if the person leaves the company. I don't know if Android or iOS can separate work and home use in this manner
"Stealing implies that you don't keep your copy. You still do." is that the same for downloading music?
So do you always answer your door with a gun in hand? Or do you ask the criminal to wait 5 minutes whilst you go and fetch yours?
"By gun owner logic or any other logic, that list does make it safer for gun owners. Its their non-gun owning neighbors who need to worry."
no, the criminal will just shoot first and ask questions later of a gun owner.
I put you on the list of not responsible enough to have a gun. I bet Rambo is your favorite film
"fire arms do not kill anyone actually. The person holding it does."
that is the most bollox of arguments because if the person held a banana instead of a gun, the banana wouldn;t have killed anyone
"This isn't a mature discussion. "
its not possible to have one with NRA supporters, its like arguing with a drunk or fundamental religionist, pointless as they they wouldn't change their mind in the face of evidence.
"I don't see how her ex knowing she has a gun puts her life in danger. If anything, it would probably act as deterrent to the jealous ex."
Just means the ex gets a gun as well and shoots first and asks questions later.
if he didn;t have guns in the first place, he wouldn;t have been broken into.
"We may not (yet) have constitutional rights to privacy,"
its about time the constitution was brought up to date and out of the cowboy era.
"Description of 'correct' is carried through centuries with the help of religion. That's the most important part of the religion, that it creates a foundation of moral thoughts." -
Moral?? religion?? you have to be joking. Misogyny, homophobia, genocide, child abuse are "correct" ??
"Even if all these religious sayings, and prophets etc. were man-made, not god-made, " - they are man made
"someone considering himself clever enough, should respect them. " - No, i should not respect them, how can anyone respect the greatest con (albiet created due to ignorance of facts) on earth
"See, the problem is not US religions telling people how to live or banning things"
its religions reason to exist - telling people how to live, who to have sex with etc.... the "liberals" are probably more aligned to the good bits of religion that the fundamentalists in that they want to cater for all rather than the church's view who only cater for themselves
seems pretty clear and correct to me. can you explain why you think its not correct?
"Atheism, not religion, is the real force behind the mass murders of history" - absolute bollox, not one war was done in the name of atheism. plenty of killing done using various holy texts as justification