u.s. just grabbed 12 domain names, on the whim of some private interests inside usa. not only that they dropped an 'for other purposes' clause, in the bill/whatever that is going to allow them to do more.
'for other purposes'. you can even put 'daydreaming' in it, and legally grap domains that help people daydream.
'learning to entertain oneself' was what i had to do in early 80s because there wasnt anything to satisfy entertainment needs. i see those early 80s as lost years, having little to do.
had there been internet while i was growing up, i would not only evaded being bored to hell, but also gain a lot of skills that would help me greatly today.
i had read britannica, larousse encyclopedias over and over, from boredom. i have learned much more by reading history on wikipedia in 1.5 years, than i spent reading encyclopedias and watching documentaries for over 15 years in between 1980-1995.
that common, human thing to do, ie, the secrecy justified by various justifications, is the VERY thing that allows all the problems you see on the face of the planet.
ranging from human rights abuses to pollution, wall street's scam to starting wars with false pretenses, the perpetrators have always worked behind the coziness of secrecy veils justified with 'national security' 'trade secrets' or 'diplomatic communique'.
The only point I tried to make is that I can still see why such talks could be less harmful when kept secret than if they became public.
when you keep it secret, like it had been before this, those countries will have the ease of the secrecy veil to work towards their goals unhindered.
'violent reactions' does not compare to war. the very fact that saudi arabia, for example, came out as the warmonger nation it is, is much more a benefit for iran than any kind of armed retaliation can bring.
The Chinese government has proven that they'll do anything to stop distribution of negative information about them.
the only difference in between the us government and chinese government, is how they approach the concept of 'doing anything' to stop distribution of negative information.
one does it directly, by arresting or killing those who distribute it, the other does it through underhanded, but improvable means.
Clashes with Europe over human rights: American officials sharply warned Germany in 2007 not to enforce arrest warrants for Central Intelligence Agency officers involved in a bungled operation in which an innocent German citizen with the same name as a suspected militant was mistakenly kidnapped and held for months in Afghanistan. A senior American diplomat told a German official “that our intention was not to threaten Germany, but rather to urge that the German government weigh carefully at every step of the way the implications for relations with the U.S.”
equivalents of gladio were founded in all countries which were members of nato. probably also in countries which were allied or affiliated with nato too.
yeah they should. despite they are not intelligence or military specialists. or, hey, since they are not specialists, why dont they take advice from those who are specialists ? like, department of defense, or, nsa, or cia ? they sure would know what to release, and what not.
had that logic worked we wouldnt be in this mess today.
at the start of this thing, he was trying to remain anonymous. apparently, when they realized that this would lead to his assassination on some roadside, he not only moved out from australia, but also moved into the spotlight. and had tried to keep the spotlight on himself, so that he would be in the mass media, internet, and remembered by people.
these are measures that makes it exceedingly difficult for private interests or governments to kill him.
Well, to be fair, just because someone advocates starting a war does not mean that war will actually be started.
your approach is too shallow. these are not ordinary trolls talking and raving on the internet. these are actual countries, which have various departments, including intelligence agencies which may act in direction of the desire of their government.
you cant imagine that, all the government of a country wont be working to that end, when the government wants war.
im expecting a certain level of aptness and awareness from anyone participating in this forum, due to the level of affiliation with technology that finding and wanting to hang out in this place requires.
as a result of this, i find it infuriating, beyond comprehension that there may be still people who are unaware of the past and ongoing filth on this planet, despite its a fucking google search away. so simple to access.
and when someone like this comes and reiterates and insists on some bullshit, the very kind of bullshit that allowed these filth to come into being in the first place,
i call asshole. or, fuck off. or, screw you.
because, i am a human being with emotions. not an automated truth dispenser unit at the wake of insisted, self-inflicted ignorance of those who prefer that.
anyone who doesnt like that, should take the very easy option to educate themselves, so, they do not incur emotions like that in other people, like me.
But they should not be able to communicate frankly when discussing Saudi Arabia's funding of terrorism, or China's deliberate sabotage, even as they work on a way to publicly discuss such things?
had there been no secrecy in the world, noone would be able to commit evil deeds on a large scale. that includes whatever saudi arabia, china are doing.
yes. because, past is past, and it never recurs, since we had had a global awakening in the last 10 years, and living in an utopic civilization in which noone engages in corruption now.
thank you for preparing the summary of my actions in the gp post. great to see your observation and documentation skills are top notch. must be handy while reporting to your superiors.
it is also only natural that you have conveniently missed reading the contents the search has brought. but its only natural loyalty to your employer. understandable.
Slashdot Mirror
u.s. just grabbed 12 domain names, on the whim of some private interests inside usa. not only that they dropped an 'for other purposes' clause, in the bill/whatever that is going to allow them to do more.
'for other purposes'. you can even put 'daydreaming' in it, and legally grap domains that help people daydream.
Decisioner pointerers, then ....
it feels like "Commentation Fixtures". or, "Movement Cornishes" ...
are there any book names that re shittier than this ?
if something is abused THAT much, it means that it doesnt work.
you mean tablets ? there were many.
the article poses that there are NEW stuff. and that apple is innovating like a startup.
there is nothing new. they are just bettering their products. two are different.
4 year old kids should be wherever they have a natural inclination and desire to be. for, only that would make their character come out.
'learning to entertain oneself' was what i had to do in early 80s because there wasnt anything to satisfy entertainment needs. i see those early 80s as lost years, having little to do.
had there been internet while i was growing up, i would not only evaded being bored to hell, but also gain a lot of skills that would help me greatly today.
i had read britannica, larousse encyclopedias over and over, from boredom. i have learned much more by reading history on wikipedia in 1.5 years, than i spent reading encyclopedias and watching documentaries for over 15 years in between 1980-1995.
it touches important points and i dont have any mod points to spend.
Better keyboard warriors and pussies in real life than someone who leaves a 5 year kid at home, alone
even if the shitty post was made just for trolling.
This is a common, human thing to do.
that common, human thing to do, ie, the secrecy justified by various justifications, is the VERY thing that allows all the problems you see on the face of the planet.
ranging from human rights abuses to pollution, wall street's scam to starting wars with false pretenses, the perpetrators have always worked behind the coziness of secrecy veils justified with 'national security' 'trade secrets' or 'diplomatic communique'.
The only point I tried to make is that I can still see why such talks could be less harmful when kept secret than if they became public.
when you keep it secret, like it had been before this, those countries will have the ease of the secrecy veil to work towards their goals unhindered.
'violent reactions' does not compare to war. the very fact that saudi arabia, for example, came out as the warmonger nation it is, is much more a benefit for iran than any kind of armed retaliation can bring.
curiously this hasnt happened since watergate. the below may have had an effect in that being so :
http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1867262&cid=34218862
The Chinese government has proven that they'll do anything to stop distribution of negative information about them.
the only difference in between the us government and chinese government, is how they approach the concept of 'doing anything' to stop distribution of negative information.
one does it directly, by arresting or killing those who distribute it, the other does it through underhanded, but improvable means.
Clashes with Europe over human rights: American officials sharply warned Germany in 2007 not to enforce arrest warrants for Central Intelligence Agency officers involved in a bungled operation in which an innocent German citizen with the same name as a suspected militant was mistakenly kidnapped and held for months in Afghanistan. A senior American diplomat told a German official “that our intention was not to threaten Germany, but rather to urge that the German government weigh carefully at every step of the way the implications for relations with the U.S.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/29cables.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp
equivalents of gladio were founded in all countries which were members of nato. probably also in countries which were allied or affiliated with nato too.
yeah they should. despite they are not intelligence or military specialists. or, hey, since they are not specialists, why dont they take advice from those who are specialists ? like, department of defense, or, nsa, or cia ? they sure would know what to release, and what not.
had that logic worked we wouldnt be in this mess today.
at the start of this thing, he was trying to remain anonymous. apparently, when they realized that this would lead to his assassination on some roadside, he not only moved out from australia, but also moved into the spotlight. and had tried to keep the spotlight on himself, so that he would be in the mass media, internet, and remembered by people.
these are measures that makes it exceedingly difficult for private interests or governments to kill him.
Well, to be fair, just because someone advocates starting a war does not mean that war will actually be started.
your approach is too shallow. these are not ordinary trolls talking and raving on the internet. these are actual countries, which have various departments, including intelligence agencies which may act in direction of the desire of their government.
you cant imagine that, all the government of a country wont be working to that end, when the government wants war.
real life and death like in iraq, afghanistan, and below ?
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/dictators.html
im expecting a certain level of aptness and awareness from anyone participating in this forum, due to the level of affiliation with technology that finding and wanting to hang out in this place requires.
as a result of this, i find it infuriating, beyond comprehension that there may be still people who are unaware of the past and ongoing filth on this planet, despite its a fucking google search away. so simple to access.
and when someone like this comes and reiterates and insists on some bullshit, the very kind of bullshit that allowed these filth to come into being in the first place,
i call asshole. or, fuck off. or, screw you.
because, i am a human being with emotions. not an automated truth dispenser unit at the wake of insisted, self-inflicted ignorance of those who prefer that.
anyone who doesnt like that, should take the very easy option to educate themselves, so, they do not incur emotions like that in other people, like me.
clear enough ? homie ?
i didnt do it. some other poster did. and it was quite fitting.
But they should not be able to communicate frankly when discussing Saudi Arabia's funding of terrorism, or China's deliberate sabotage, even as they work on a way to publicly discuss such things?
had there been no secrecy in the world, noone would be able to commit evil deeds on a large scale. that includes whatever saudi arabia, china are doing.
and we NEED the participation of every able minded citizen to hold our shit together during this period.
basically, meaning, aiding the governments that have perpetrated this filth, by cooperating.
rest of your post is incomprehensible.
yes. because, past is past, and it never recurs, since we had had a global awakening in the last 10 years, and living in an utopic civilization in which noone engages in corruption now.
buzz off.
thank you for preparing the summary of my actions in the gp post. great to see your observation and documentation skills are top notch. must be handy while reporting to your superiors.
it is also only natural that you have conveniently missed reading the contents the search has brought. but its only natural loyalty to your employer. understandable.
how are employment opportunities and benefits in cia, nsa, or whichever agency you work for, these days ?