Almost every single crop has naturally occurring pesticides
yes. the keyword is NATURALLY. ie, like as in evolution. not direct genetic manipulation. any genetic manipulation that has not passed through the timefilter of evolution is a risk. that filter has filtered out what manipulation can exist without breaking things and what cannot.
It works !! it works SO well that you can understand how well it works from the words from testimony of Alan Greenspan in front of senate inquiry committee regarding wall street :
"I dont understand why corporations didnt regulate themselves"
those random mutations have happened over millions of years of time, evolving to be not in conflict with the entire biosphere it inhabits. break the chain somewhere, and youll get corn growing out of your ass.
is to thoughtfully and radically remove money from politics
thats a fairy tale in a capitalist economy in which some minority can command mountains of cash against the minority. there is no way to prevent backdoor dealings over money. observe what happens with bureaucrats - like the whore who just retired from fcc in order to take up a good paying job in a corporation she benefited. seemingly there was no cash transaction occurred when all the process was happening. but, what happened in the end ?
Thats what happens when you wait to protect the very thing you live on - the internet. Those parties perpetrating sopa has been trying to pass some shit like this since early 2004. What have you done ? nothing. just kept on with your business.
If you had had started lobbying as the datacenter/hosting industry back then, none of these would have happened. But this industry is not the only one to blame. There are search industries, device manufacturers, google, microsoft. Granted, some of the latter did some stuff about acta. But totally insufficient. Instead, everyone sat in their pretty and secure silicon valley bubbles, and behaved as if internet was untouchable. At least it seemed totally stupid to break it, and to the detriment of everyone. But hey ! here is something to break it totally for the benefit of a VERY small minority - so much that a few hands could count the number of those who will primarily benefit in the ultimate end.
let me see - people are allowed to be total jerks, assholes, self-centered pricks and talk entirely against the morals and ethics of our time. sometimes, even the very principles that create our own modern society. that is all fine and ok, and noone goes to argue that such people do not deserve a response.
but....
when someone talks smack or slang or insults someone else, it becomes a problem......i see a contradiction there. one would say that calling someone an idiot would be a much less noticeable offense compared to believing and advocating scrapping of modern ideals and morals. but for some reason, here you are, telling me otherwise.
As whory as a whore can be. With all due respect and reference to the whores.
That is not something new godaddy started doing just recently. They had the habit of pulling such shit for close to a decade now. the only provider that is FAR worse, is 1&1 in all its incarnations. I had to bail out numerous clients out of their hands - both godaddy and 1&1. some, i wasnt able to bail out, and these were generally those with 1&1.
The array of problems they cause ? it ranges from what you read here, to locking your domain down, preventing you from paying for renewal and sending you to collections over $9-10 a year. Just google it.
is it. and what if some from african countries say 'have these people actually tried human meat ? its delicious' and continue to break off from the world consensus banning cannibalism, and re-institute cannibalism in their country because it has been practiced for thousands of years as a part of various local religions ?
Also have these people actually tried whale meat? It's delicious.
is it. and what if some from african countries say 'have these people actually tried human meat ? its delicious' and continue to break off from the world consensus banning cannibalism, and re-institute cannibalism in their country because it has been practiced for thousands of years as a part of various local religions ?
no - its the same proposition, same kind of argument, exactly like the idiotic expression you used to.... maybe attempt to make a point.
self-centered, short-horizon fucktards like you make this world a mess.
that means, the majority of the countries which have a stake in this, are against whaling. but, japan, engages in whaling on its own accord.
then lets reflect on this - where does the 'individual freedom' stop ? see, majority of the countries in the world find something unethical and ban something, like slavery. and then is it ok if i broke accord and go against majority, and engage in slaving within my own country or international waters/zones - based on my own 'freedom' ?
it is a simple case of individual freedom's limits. there is no unlimited individual freedom, and there cant be unlimited individual freedom. you cant just go shit in your neighbor's backyard, or your neighbor cant just shit on the streets in common space. there are all encompassing rules that everyone needs to obey for society to EXIST (note how i didnt say 'work', but, even to exist), and these rules are determined by the overall level of ethics and morals understanding of the entire society. (planet in this case).
Society didnt show mercy to carriage industry when automobiles came out.
There is no reason why it should show mercy to publishing industry - carriage industry produced something even. publishing industry is just middlemen. and now, unnecessary.
And look how they threaten new technologies and those who use new technologies - 'without friction' they say. wow. imagine it with carriage industry - if this suing frenzy bullshit had been around back at the start of 20th century, we probably wouldnt be using cars as we are using them today.
i say fuck them. you should say so too. society's progress cannot be held hostage to the desires of a minority interest to protect its private profit.
Santa of course is not an effin elf.
on
The Science of Santa
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Santa Claus derives from St. Nicholas, who was someone lived around early byzantine era in western anatolia. (modern turkey). He used to give presents to the kids.
In line with the person it was derived from, santa claus is not an elf himself - he is a magic person (human). Elf 'helpers' were added in recent centuries through influence of celtic/anglosakson folklore.
Slashdot Mirror
market" .............
so in the end didnt they end up selling it for top dollar ?
elance.com
but youll need to build reputation for a few jobs. then you can work your way up from there. your age does not matter zit.
that's capitalism for you.
of fighting forward.
All these multibillion dollar corporations, a web this big in size, incomparable amount of tech professionals in i.t. than any other field, and what ?
nobody is doing nothing. just eff and a few other organizations fighting futile battles in bought-out courts.
What have you done for your internet ?
in a few weeks. i have 4-5 domains there.
Almost every single crop has naturally occurring pesticides
yes. the keyword is NATURALLY. ie, like as in evolution. not direct genetic manipulation. any genetic manipulation that has not passed through the timefilter of evolution is a risk. that filter has filtered out what manipulation can exist without breaking things and what cannot.
angsty teens who are trying to shock themselves into relevance.
It works !! it works SO well that you can understand how well it works from the words from testimony of Alan Greenspan in front of senate inquiry committee regarding wall street :
"I dont understand why corporations didnt regulate themselves"
those random mutations have happened over millions of years of time, evolving to be not in conflict with the entire biosphere it inhabits. break the chain somewhere, and youll get corn growing out of your ass.
built into its genes ?
and this is safe, because nothing has happened, YET ?
Insects mutated/adapted to this in just years' time. What makes us exceptions despite we are living on the same planet ?
so you basically sat until sopa was almost upon you. did nothing since 2004 until now ....
Such a good price/performance tablet was LONG overdue.
i wasnt gonna buy a tablet, but, i can buy this without any considerations that it will be a waste.
is to thoughtfully and radically remove money from politics
thats a fairy tale in a capitalist economy in which some minority can command mountains of cash against the minority. there is no way to prevent backdoor dealings over money. observe what happens with bureaucrats - like the whore who just retired from fcc in order to take up a good paying job in a corporation she benefited. seemingly there was no cash transaction occurred when all the process was happening. but, what happened in the end ?
Thats what happens when you wait to protect the very thing you live on - the internet. Those parties perpetrating sopa has been trying to pass some shit like this since early 2004. What have you done ? nothing. just kept on with your business.
If you had had started lobbying as the datacenter/hosting industry back then, none of these would have happened. But this industry is not the only one to blame. There are search industries, device manufacturers, google, microsoft. Granted, some of the latter did some stuff about acta. But totally insufficient. Instead, everyone sat in their pretty and secure silicon valley bubbles, and behaved as if internet was untouchable. At least it seemed totally stupid to break it, and to the detriment of everyone. But hey ! here is something to break it totally for the benefit of a VERY small minority - so much that a few hands could count the number of those who will primarily benefit in the ultimate end.
Now, what are you going to do ?
let me see - people are allowed to be total jerks, assholes, self-centered pricks and talk entirely against the morals and ethics of our time. sometimes, even the very principles that create our own modern society. that is all fine and ok, and noone goes to argue that such people do not deserve a response.
....
......i see a contradiction there. one would say that calling someone an idiot would be a much less noticeable offense compared to believing and advocating scrapping of modern ideals and morals. but for some reason, here you are, telling me otherwise.
but
when someone talks smack or slang or insults someone else, it becomes a problem
i cared for his story and i found it interesting. now what.
wait until you chance up against one serious issue. or even, try to cancel/move out your stuff.
As whory as a whore can be. With all due respect and reference to the whores.
That is not something new godaddy started doing just recently. They had the habit of pulling such shit for close to a decade now. the only provider that is FAR worse, is 1&1 in all its incarnations. I had to bail out numerous clients out of their hands - both godaddy and 1&1. some, i wasnt able to bail out, and these were generally those with 1&1.
The array of problems they cause ? it ranges from what you read here, to locking your domain down, preventing you from paying for renewal and sending you to collections over $9-10 a year. Just google it.
is it. and what if some from african countries say 'have these people actually tried human meat ? its delicious' and continue to break off from the world consensus banning cannibalism, and re-institute cannibalism in their country because it has been practiced for thousands of years as a part of various local religions ?
Also have these people actually tried whale meat? It's delicious.
is it. and what if some from african countries say 'have these people actually tried human meat ? its delicious' and continue to break off from the world consensus banning cannibalism, and re-institute cannibalism in their country because it has been practiced for thousands of years as a part of various local religions ?
.... maybe attempt to make a point.
no - its the same proposition, same kind of argument, exactly like the idiotic expression you used to
self-centered, short-horizon fucktards like you make this world a mess.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110513075522AAgInY0
http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2590622&cid=38493048
whaling is illegal in majority of countries which actually could engage in whaling. case in point below.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7188674.stm
that means, the majority of the countries which have a stake in this, are against whaling. but, japan, engages in whaling on its own accord.
then lets reflect on this - where does the 'individual freedom' stop ? see, majority of the countries in the world find something unethical and ban something, like slavery. and then is it ok if i broke accord and go against majority, and engage in slaving within my own country or international waters/zones - based on my own 'freedom' ?
it is a simple case of individual freedom's limits. there is no unlimited individual freedom, and there cant be unlimited individual freedom. you cant just go shit in your neighbor's backyard, or your neighbor cant just shit on the streets in common space. there are all encompassing rules that everyone needs to obey for society to EXIST (note how i didnt say 'work', but, even to exist), and these rules are determined by the overall level of ethics and morals understanding of the entire society. (planet in this case).
Society didnt show mercy to carriage industry when automobiles came out.
There is no reason why it should show mercy to publishing industry - carriage industry produced something even. publishing industry is just middlemen. and now, unnecessary.
And look how they threaten new technologies and those who use new technologies - 'without friction' they say. wow. imagine it with carriage industry - if this suing frenzy bullshit had been around back at the start of 20th century, we probably wouldnt be using cars as we are using them today.
i say fuck them. you should say so too. society's progress cannot be held hostage to the desires of a minority interest to protect its private profit.
Santa Claus derives from St. Nicholas, who was someone lived around early byzantine era in western anatolia. (modern turkey). He used to give presents to the kids.
In line with the person it was derived from, santa claus is not an elf himself - he is a magic person (human). Elf 'helpers' were added in recent centuries through influence of celtic/anglosakson folklore.