ayn rand's morondom is in that, she and the likes of her church think that SOMEHOW there wont be anyone using their economical power they gained through 'free market' to end the 'free' in the 'market'. leave aside politics.
that is belief. nothing else. they are no different than the early christians who believed that their holy lord would SOMEHOW fix things for them.
thats probably why all the 3 supercomputer orders in the last 3 weeks have been placed by amd bulldozers. because 10 core xeons 'quite handily' beat an amd 16 core machine..
regulation does not have a place in fascism. if it had, german economy would be regulated during world war ii. instead, despite they so desperately needed mass mobilization, they allowed the private sector to function as it was peacetime, and therefore lost 50 to 60% production capacity, because the private sector was maximizing profits despite the need for mobilization.
despicable is the slant right wing american political shitwipes are propagating through lobby corporations, trying to even distort the basics of political science. more despicable are the morons who actually believe them without knowing shit.
dont talk, if you dont know shit. what you typed in there in one shot, are THREE different, separate concepts, and they dont go together. one cannot exist or be merged with the other. but you have written them as if they are one or merged concepts.
so, basically you dont know shit about these, and yet you have typed us what, 6 paragraphs ?
how about taking that time to actually google and read what the concepts you were shitting about ACTUALLY mean, from wikipedia or some other source ? out of respect for the people in your community ? huh ? so next time, you wont shit around without actually knowing shit and coming up like an idiot ?
Bottom line – Bulldozer isn't good at multithreading, it's good at integer work. Unfortunately, servers are mostly logic work, so sandy bridge is likely to destroy it.
excuse me but you have posted the same bullshit without knowing SHIT about what you are talking on the second time here. apparently you havent read what you have been told about how logic work being integer work by another slashdotter.
i replied to you on your ignorance in the other post. 3 supercomputers that are bulldozer based, in the past 3 weeks. a supercomputer a week. yes. sandy bridge e must be 'LIKELY' to destroy bulldozer in heavily multithreaded workloads.
how about not talking on stuff you dont know shit about next time, and not coming up like a moron as a consequence ? please.
Bottom line – Bulldozer isn't good at multithreading, it's good at integer work. Unfortunately, servers are mostly logic work, so sandy bridge is likely to destroy it.
oh boy. i just saw this. you dont know shit.
'servers are mostly logic work' hahahahaa. luckily someone else gave your answer.
next time, dont talk without knowing shit. 'servers' mean heavily multithreaded integer work. in these, bulldozer excels. and that is also one of the reasons why there have been 3 amd opteron (bulldozer 16 core) supercomputer orders in the past 3 weeks. NOT intel. amd. opteron, bulldozer. SUPERcomputer.
This test employs threaded filters, taxing as many cores as we throw at it. Zambezi’s eight integer units capitalize, flying past the Core i5 and Core i7, outright trouncing the six-core Phenom II X6 1100T, too.
they are much more capable in multithreaded performance. dozer cores were especially designed for these. like, how apparently 'sucking' for desktops, dozer surpasses all normal SBs (not e) in heavily multithreaded apps (4 cores and more) like photoshop cs5.
servers are heavily multithreaded. since dozer cores are especially suitable for tasks that are run on servers, more cores become even more desirable.
3 weeks, 3 supercomputer orders, the minimum value of each is 200 million. 2000 cpus minimum goes to just one of them. none intel, none anything other than amd.
yes, its pretty much domination with this picture.
Some people are not bothered by that 900$. Some people will buy the outrageously priced video cards for the limited benefits.
i am one of those 'some people', and i participate in communities that are populated by those people, and noone will buy something that provides only 15-20% performance, but burns a small oven and is priced at a fucking $900.
Slashdot Mirror
read overclock net. you dont know shit, yet you are still talking.
ayn rand's morondom is in that, she and the likes of her church think that SOMEHOW there wont be anyone using their economical power they gained through 'free market' to end the 'free' in the 'market'. leave aside politics.
that is belief. nothing else. they are no different than the early christians who believed that their holy lord would SOMEHOW fix things for them.
yes yes. thats why 1 amd supercomputer with bulldozers were ordered EVERY WEEK in the past 3 weeks. shut the fuck up if you dont know shit.
thats probably why all the 3 supercomputer orders in the last 3 weeks have been placed by amd bulldozers. because 10 core xeons 'quite handily' beat an amd 16 core machine ..
go fuck off.
wikipedia i presume.
regulation does not have a place in fascism. if it had, german economy would be regulated during world war ii. instead, despite they so desperately needed mass mobilization, they allowed the private sector to function as it was peacetime, and therefore lost 50 to 60% production capacity, because the private sector was maximizing profits despite the need for mobilization.
despicable is the slant right wing american political shitwipes are propagating through lobby corporations, trying to even distort the basics of political science. more despicable are the morons who actually believe them without knowing shit.
fascist communist/socialist
dont talk, if you dont know shit. what you typed in there in one shot, are THREE different, separate concepts, and they dont go together. one cannot exist or be merged with the other. but you have written them as if they are one or merged concepts.
so, basically you dont know shit about these, and yet you have typed us what, 6 paragraphs ?
how about taking that time to actually google and read what the concepts you were shitting about ACTUALLY mean, from wikipedia or some other source ? out of respect for the people in your community ? huh ? so next time, you wont shit around without actually knowing shit and coming up like an idiot ?
corporate fascism, which is actually the definition of fascism ?
Anyone yet objecting to this definition ?
oooooh. yes its that simple.
even the i5 beats the shit out of it
are you aware that the tooling process and silicon cutting in the factories for this chip, has not matured yet ? do you even know what these mean ?
Bottom line – Bulldozer isn't good at multithreading, it's good at integer work. Unfortunately, servers are mostly logic work, so sandy bridge is likely to destroy it.
excuse me but you have posted the same bullshit without knowing SHIT about what you are talking on the second time here. apparently you havent read what you have been told about how logic work being integer work by another slashdotter.
i replied to you on your ignorance in the other post. 3 supercomputers that are bulldozer based, in the past 3 weeks. a supercomputer a week. yes. sandy bridge e must be 'LIKELY' to destroy bulldozer in heavily multithreaded workloads.
how about not talking on stuff you dont know shit about next time, and not coming up like a moron as a consequence ? please.
Bottom line – Bulldozer isn't good at multithreading, it's good at integer work. Unfortunately, servers are mostly logic work, so sandy bridge is likely to destroy it.
oh boy. i just saw this. you dont know shit.
'servers are mostly logic work' hahahahaa. luckily someone else gave your answer.
next time, dont talk without knowing shit. 'servers' mean heavily multithreaded integer work. in these, bulldozer excels. and that is also one of the reasons why there have been 3 amd opteron (bulldozer 16 core) supercomputer orders in the past 3 weeks. NOT intel. amd. opteron, bulldozer. SUPERcomputer.
there many times more
yes. then instead if shooting from the hip, recount those times and occasions.
and many, many, moooreeee
-mainconcept http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...&limitstart=17
-mediashow http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...ssor-review/14
-h.264 http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...ssor-review/14
-vp8 http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...ssor-review/17
-sha1 http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...ssor-review/17
-photoshop cs5 http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...&limitstart=14
-photoshop cs5 http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...x,3043-15.html
-winrar, faster than 2600k http://www.techspot.com/review/452-a...pus/page7.html
-winrar, improves over x6 http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...x,3043-16.html
-7-zip better than 2600k here: http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4955/41698.png http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/t...x8150-tested/7
-7-zip same perf as 2600k http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...x,3043-16.html
-POV-ray, faster than 2600k http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/10/
-POV-ray http://www.nordichardware.se/test-la...art=15#content
-x264(2nd pass AVX enabled) http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/t...x8150-tested/7
-x264 (2nd pass, better overall than 2600k) http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=2125&pageID=11108
-x264 (2nd pass +.3 than SB2600k) http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/7/
-handbrake; http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/9/
-truecrypt; http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=2125&pageID=11111
-solidworks; faster than 2600k http://www.techspot.com/review/452-a...pus/page7.html
-abbyy filereader http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...x,3043-16.html
-C-Ray, as fast as $1k i7-990X, http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/v.../c-rayir38.png
really.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8150-zambezi-bulldozer-990fx,3043-15.html
radial blur, shape blur, median, polar coordinates.
This test employs threaded filters, taxing as many cores as we throw at it. Zambezi’s eight integer units capitalize, flying past the Core i5 and Core i7, outright trouncing the six-core Phenom II X6 1100T, too.
can easily and truly say that, 'they represent me'.
i have given no allowance or authority to any other party, or representative, up till this point.
is that why there have been 3 supercomputer orders in the last 3 weeks with amd's bulldozer opterons ?
they are like 3/4 cores. neither 1 core, nor half core.
that must be why 3 supercomputers with dozer opterons have been ordered in the past 3 weeks.
intel cant field more than 6 cores at the same time in even sandy bridge E. multithreaded apps like server apps, shine in bulldozer.
they are much more capable in multithreaded performance. dozer cores were especially designed for these. like, how apparently 'sucking' for desktops, dozer surpasses all normal SBs (not e) in heavily multithreaded apps (4 cores and more) like photoshop cs5.
servers are heavily multithreaded. since dozer cores are especially suitable for tasks that are run on servers, more cores become even more desirable.
20 next year, 24 the next, and so on.
3 weeks, 3 supercomputer orders, the minimum value of each is 200 million. 2000 cpus minimum goes to just one of them. none intel, none anything other than amd.
yes, its pretty much domination with this picture.
if electricity providers sold me unlimited power draw. they are not. they are charging per usage. isps, are not doing that.
Some people are not bothered by that 900$. Some people will buy the outrageously priced video cards for the limited benefits.
i am one of those 'some people', and i participate in communities that are populated by those people, and noone will buy something that provides only 15-20% performance, but burns a small oven and is priced at a fucking $900.