When I was a kid they'd do the same thing, but they had to wear a blindfold for a month to go without their eyes. Then they'd take it off, and go about their normal lives.
Sometimes wags would question it, but they'll only shame you for being small-minded if you go that route.
I agree that's what some people are saying about it, but the language they use seems to be functionally the same as the DMCA.
We won't know until we see the final wording. Reporting is based on leaked draft that uses unclear wording. You're construing, or rather repeating, that the sky will fall and the meaning has to be the most-disruptive-imaginable. That seems like an unwise method of interpretation.
They're required to respond to take-down requests with a "best effort," either to get a license, or to make the work unavailable. That's the wording you're working from. There is no reason at all to think that giving their "best effort" is impossible, and that's their shield from liability. It seems a rather easy shield to wield to me.
Hey dumbass, your application to be the guy that decides what all the words mean? Denied.
I know you're an idiot, you've been posting idiot shit on this site for years, but what the fuck makes you think you would get to make up a new meaning for a common term? I mean, did you fall out of bed and have a head injury this morning?
Get some fucking internet and look up what Open Source is!
Right, you're not an artist so you don't imagine that art comes from somewhere.
Whatever the artist says their art is, it is. OK. Very subjective.
That doesn't apply to the viewer of the art. When I create art, and you look at it, it doesn't stop being what I created and become what you think about it.
As funny as I'm sure that is, I can easily program software to dream. I don't, because it would use more power than normal sleep mode, and saving power is the only reason for a computer to sleep.
Why people with philosophy degrees are unemployable.
Like somebody with a philosophy degree explained to me, most jobs don't require years of specialized training, but they still prefer to hire people with a degree. So the more important issue is; what do you want to spend those years studying and writing about?
If you want to be a rocket engineer or a surgeon, you have to be careful about what degree you get. For most professionals it actually doesn't matter. A philosophy degree qualifies you for the majority of professional careers, just like every other degree.
It is as stupid as saying that a cloud was an artist because the snow was so pretty.
Picking out "which is which" bears no resemblance to how is customarily used.
And people already use beautiful items as decorations, including both things that are art, and things that are not art.
Something is art (noun) if it the act of creation was art (verb). If it is merely beautiful, or you lack details about its creation, then it isn't art, or maybe you just don't know. But the mystery experienced by a viewer isn't part of the act of creation, and isn't part of the art.
You're just repeating the flamebait summary, when actually the UK is only refusing to "completely ban" them. They're still agreeing that extensive "mitigation" is necessary, and they won't be allowed everywhere. So only a partial ban.
You're just some foreign propagandist's tool. Like a bot, but stupider.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, is addiction a disease, or a choice? The situation clearly begins with choices.
When I was a kid they'd do the same thing, but they had to wear a blindfold for a month to go without their eyes. Then they'd take it off, and go about their normal lives.
Sometimes wags would question it, but they'll only shame you for being small-minded if you go that route.
First rule of internet chat: never turn on message notifications.
Maybe they replied, maybe they didn't. Who cares? If I have time when I'm clicking on it, I'll click on it. If not, not.
Device for increased oxidation under heavy acceleration.
High speed trash compactor.
So, you can't tell the difference between the concept of a thing, and an actual example of that thing.
You're missing out on like, 3000 years of philosophy.
I agree that's what some people are saying about it, but the language they use seems to be functionally the same as the DMCA.
We won't know until we see the final wording. Reporting is based on leaked draft that uses unclear wording. You're construing, or rather repeating, that the sky will fall and the meaning has to be the most-disruptive-imaginable. That seems like an unwise method of interpretation.
They're required to respond to take-down requests with a "best effort," either to get a license, or to make the work unavailable. That's the wording you're working from. There is no reason at all to think that giving their "best effort" is impossible, and that's their shield from liability. It seems a rather easy shield to wield to me.
Yeah, but they were high enough to feel spacey, that counts right?
"Dude, I think I can see Romulus from up here!"
I'm just wandering what a cloud camp revival looks like.
Team-building exercises combining Agile and XP, and at break time Uncle Bob plays with a laser pointer on the big screen for Alms.
Then three hours of chanting in Smalltalk, followed by Aaron Patterson preaching about the intersection between programming exercises and spandex.
I agree, too soon. Too soon.
No, but using a different meaning doesn't change theirs. They don't control shit, but their use can't be controlled, either.
All the meanings of the words are meanings of the words, but the main meaning in a context is still the main meaning.
The part that was stupid above was the "that's all it means" part, because "all it means" at a minimum needs to include the known meanings.
You're fooling yourself if you don't believe it.
Come on, let's see what you've got just take your best shot and don't blow it.
Hey dumbass, your application to be the guy that decides what all the words mean? Denied.
I know you're an idiot, you've been posting idiot shit on this site for years, but what the fuck makes you think you would get to make up a new meaning for a common term? I mean, did you fall out of bed and have a head injury this morning?
Get some fucking internet and look up what Open Source is!
Right, you're not an artist so you don't imagine that art comes from somewhere.
Whatever the artist says their art is, it is. OK. Very subjective.
That doesn't apply to the viewer of the art. When I create art, and you look at it, it doesn't stop being what I created and become what you think about it.
Of the 3, RHEL is the only one whose distribution system even generates clear numbers.
But if you're using continuous integration, then it is the same. Right?
The main reason I develop on CentOS is that I have the same environment as RHEL.
So that hides the use case you mention from the data.
As funny as I'm sure that is, I can easily program software to dream. I don't, because it would use more power than normal sleep mode, and saving power is the only reason for a computer to sleep.
Indeed, if it is art is defined by what it was that was created, but that is no limit on what you can use to create your own positive experience.
If the experience the artist intended had anything to do with art, most of the classics would cease to be popular! lol
Who is to say it has to be art for you to gain insight?
Why people with philosophy degrees are unemployable.
Like somebody with a philosophy degree explained to me, most jobs don't require years of specialized training, but they still prefer to hire people with a degree. So the more important issue is; what do you want to spend those years studying and writing about?
If you want to be a rocket engineer or a surgeon, you have to be careful about what degree you get. For most professionals it actually doesn't matter. A philosophy degree qualifies you for the majority of professional careers, just like every other degree.
It is as stupid as saying that a cloud was an artist because the snow was so pretty.
Picking out "which is which" bears no resemblance to how is customarily used.
And people already use beautiful items as decorations, including both things that are art, and things that are not art.
Something is art (noun) if it the act of creation was art (verb). If it is merely beautiful, or you lack details about its creation, then it isn't art, or maybe you just don't know. But the mystery experienced by a viewer isn't part of the act of creation, and isn't part of the art.
I'm not sure beer is wise, but if they'd sell the people next to me some pot brownies so they can sleep it would really help.
But what about the Freeze Peach?!
It gonna solve the puzzle. It was RICO. In the repository. With the Logan Act.
You're just repeating the flamebait summary, when actually the UK is only refusing to "completely ban" them. They're still agreeing that extensive "mitigation" is necessary, and they won't be allowed everywhere. So only a partial ban.
You're just some foreign propagandist's tool. Like a bot, but stupider.
Using a different word doesn't stop it from existing.
It is silly to pretend that things work that way.