My composting experience tells me that bad smells come from an excess of target material, and a dearth of "brown" material; which is a carbon source. Carbon is the main limiting nutrient for the desired decomposition. When there is not enough carbon for the bacteria, then yeasts end up doing more of the work; resulting in a horrid poop-like smell caused by fermentation.
In a garden it is hard to get enough carbon in just using yard waste; you need a giant pile of tree leaves that have been left out to age in the air. The leaves don't rot in that situation, but they do break down a little bit. After they're aged, they're a great carbon source. Or you can add other carbon sources, like wood ashes.
But here, they're talking about using wood chips. As long as the chips are small enough, this is a perfect carbon source. They'll have an easy time managing it.
The hard part in a garden is that you don't really want to have to haul in extra material to use in the compost, so people tend to have too much "green" and not enough "brown." Too much nitrogen, not enough carbon.
It's painfully obvious you haven't spent much time in the forest. Things smell bad when they first die. Later, when they're a pile of bones on the forest floor, they just smell like the forest floor.
You fail to comprehend that the soil is already the remains of the humans, deer, bear, fish that you speak of.
Even some mushrooms smell bad during the first stage of decomposition. Ginko trees smell bad in the fall when the fruit is rotting on the ground, but the soil smells fine in the spring.
Even in the garden; a rotting pumpkin might smell really bad for a few months.
Worms have a distributed nervous system with no brain, and they react to their environment in a very similar way as creates that have a centralized system. So it might not present the dividing line that is generally presumed.
Please advise on how I can block ads [without dolling out cash], on Android.
1) Do not install the app at all. Just say no. 2) Use firefox 3) Install either uBlock Origin or Adblock Plus 4) Use the youtube website through the browser.
Most k-pop bands upload their official music videos to youtube.
Because they're good at merchandising, that's why they're more profitable (on a per-fan basis) than western music groups.
And music videos have no value. Nobody ever made a bunch of money selling DVDs of music videos. Madonna makes a bunch of money selling DVDs of concerts. But the official music videos get almost all of their value from their ability to promote the band.
Fan videos of concerts add a fantasy element, it feels more like you're at a concert when you can see the top of the head of the person in front of you, and the video is bouncing around with the music, etc.
They learn most of what they need to know from geological studies that are related to those explosives.
They already have good data, and well-developed statistical methods for processing it. AI here would only help on the margins, it wouldn't help them on deciding where to mine.
It would probably be useful for people who buy depleted mines and then find the nooks and crannies that have a little gold left. But the big boys have no need for it until it is so good that they don't have to hire geologists anymore.
Except people on slashdot seem to place having a 3.5mm headphone socket on their fondleslab above 'self-actualization' as the ultimate goal in life.
You may have that on its head. The company wants my money. I want a 3.5mm phone jack. Why do I need to give them my money at all? Why do my conditions for when I would be willing to give them my money tell you something about my needs? I don't have any need to give out money for products I don't even want.
Or in terms of that chart you linked, I can focus on self-actualization and their desire to have my money doesn't even amount to a bump in the road or a bug on the windshield.
OTOH, my ability to manage the soundtrack that I live my life to assists my feelings of self-actualization. The ability to choose the products that I want supports that; getting talked into trying some new paradigm some company is pushing out, that doesn't assist me with anything on that chart at all! So if I have a preference for a 3.5mm phone jack, that chart says I should just buy a phone with one, and I win.
When you found short-term blah-blah in the data to point at, that is weather. Don't pretend to have done a statistical analysis; you didn't. You're not speaking statistically. You're just talking with your hands.
No deluge throttles your D/L if you throttle your U/L. I use Deluge when I'm seeding something, but not as my regular leacher.
Not correct. Many clients show preference for other clients that are actively uploading. If you don't even upload while you download then you're not a full participant in the swarm. Each client limits the number of other nodes that it connects to. Strong preference is of course given to clients that are available to download from.
For example, if you only connected to clients that were downloading, your own download stay at 0%, and you'd have nothing to share. When you're uploading fast enough to stay in another node's group of connected nodes, then you're both uploading and downloading at the same time, so you're both actively maintaining a spot in each other's connection pool. If you're only downloading, you're only downloading from the original seeder; and that person's client is trying to stay connected to the higher quality nodes that are distributing the data down the tree.
It is basic and obvious; you have to upload at some minimum speed on a per-node basic for those nodes to notice you exist and to consider you a useful part of the swarm. So turn down the max number of upload slots so that you can give full upload speed to a few nodes at a time, and you'll find those needs keep you in their connection pool more often.
Deluge gives you complete control over the fine details, you don't have to wonder if it is slowing you down. You just have to learn enough about the technology to figure out how to match the settings to your available resources. You probably only need to turn down the number of upload slots, so you're not spreading your upload bandwidth between too many connections and causing them all to think you're too slow. Even with 10% the upload bandwidth as download, this works really well and you should have no problems. Just make sure that you also have 10% the upload slots as download slots. It also helps in most cases to limit the total number of concurrent connections to under 100; I use 35 total, and 2 upload slots. I have no trouble using all my available download bandwidth with those settings, and my ratio stays really really low, I'm still mostly only leaching. And yet, torrents with low numbers of slow seeders, then my ratio goes up and everybody wins and we get our download.
I'm sure they do remember to pamper and powder it every day.
But I have a cheap, off-brand phone, and it has enough battery life that I don't have to do that. I can just wait until it gets low, and then the next time I'm near a USB charger, I charge it.
Having to do a specific step only a certain time of day to always have it pre-done might work fine for people doing it, but it is disruptive to demand that everybody do things that way, especially just to make their phone happy. I don't want to have to do anything differently in my life just to make a phone happy. It doesn't even have feelings.
I get hung up on even simpler things; what if I didn't remember to charge an extra, optional device, does that really mean I should go all day without music? Seems silly.
Remembering to charge one device should be enough; I mean, for people doing it that way, it does work well already.
Luckily, most actual 1/8" jacks were made during a 5 year period in the 1970s, and everything else that says 1/8th in is actually 3.5mm packaged for the US.:)
I have half a dozen 3.5mm to 6.35mm converters, mono and stereo, and all of them said 1/8" to 1/4" on the package.:)
So, while what you said is technically true, if you're going by the numbers on the product it will appear to be false. But if you grab a random plug near that size and it doesn't fit; don't force it! Look closer first.
If I'm walking down the street listening to my headphones, and I decide to enter a store or library or something, I just unplug the headphones. This is configured to pause my media player. When I leave and I'm ready to listen to music again, I just plug the headphones back in, and it continues. Nothing to charge. No buttons to press. I don't need to unlock my screen first. Or after. Plugged in = playing, unplugged = pause. Simple, easy.
You're not going to improve on that until batteries are so good that you can build years of battery life into the headphones; and it will still be less convenient for most styles of headphones.
bittorrent is what people call the technology, so don't expect people to even know you're talking about somebody's Brandybrand(TM). They should choose a new brand, one that is whimsical instead of functional. That's true even if their old brand was originally whimsical before it became functional.
Did you have any point, other than to give enough details to show you understand the point, but also to show that you're trying to distract from it by placing emphasis on historical dates that are misleading?
Wave your hands some more, but it shows that you do understand, and are trolling. You're splitting hairs not because the detail is relevant, but to make irrelevant details appear to contradict the claims. Pathetic waste of effort.
They don't keep your card, they pre authorise a large amount to cover your tab,....
That's as much as I read. You already know that I've told you about a common practice. You're telling me, what? That you don't believe I exist, or you think I'm from another planet and just making it up?
I'm not interested in the comments of people who don't even comprehend that they're replying to people's actual, real-life experiences. If you don't believe that I experienced things the way I reported, why would you even reply?
If you had a different experience, say so; don't tell me my experience didn't happen.
None of that matters, the judge found that plaintiffs hadn't been harmed. So it doesn't matter what the law is; there is no lawsuit.
If it is inappropriate or not isn't going to be discovered by claiming harm. You'd have to find some sort of forum where appropriateness can be considered, like in Congress.
Slashdot Mirror
My composting experience tells me that bad smells come from an excess of target material, and a dearth of "brown" material; which is a carbon source. Carbon is the main limiting nutrient for the desired decomposition. When there is not enough carbon for the bacteria, then yeasts end up doing more of the work; resulting in a horrid poop-like smell caused by fermentation.
In a garden it is hard to get enough carbon in just using yard waste; you need a giant pile of tree leaves that have been left out to age in the air. The leaves don't rot in that situation, but they do break down a little bit. After they're aged, they're a great carbon source. Or you can add other carbon sources, like wood ashes.
But here, they're talking about using wood chips. As long as the chips are small enough, this is a perfect carbon source. They'll have an easy time managing it.
The hard part in a garden is that you don't really want to have to haul in extra material to use in the compost, so people tend to have too much "green" and not enough "brown." Too much nitrogen, not enough carbon.
It's painfully obvious you haven't spent much time in the forest. Things smell bad when they first die. Later, when they're a pile of bones on the forest floor, they just smell like the forest floor.
You fail to comprehend that the soil is already the remains of the humans, deer, bear, fish that you speak of.
Even some mushrooms smell bad during the first stage of decomposition. Ginko trees smell bad in the fall when the fruit is rotting on the ground, but the soil smells fine in the spring.
Even in the garden; a rotting pumpkin might smell really bad for a few months.
Worms have a distributed nervous system with no brain, and they react to their environment in a very similar way as creates that have a centralized system. So it might not present the dividing line that is generally presumed.
Why should it not cost cash? It takes time and money to create that app, and keep it up to date as ad tech evolves.
I do wonder if there'd be a lawsuit if someone built such an app.
Only if they made promises to investors about having users. ;)
Please advise on how I can block ads [without dolling out cash], on Android.
1) Do not install the app at all. Just say no.
2) Use firefox
3) Install either uBlock Origin or Adblock Plus
4) Use the youtube website through the browser.
Never install apps.
Most k-pop bands upload their official music videos to youtube.
Because they're good at merchandising, that's why they're more profitable (on a per-fan basis) than western music groups.
And music videos have no value. Nobody ever made a bunch of money selling DVDs of music videos. Madonna makes a bunch of money selling DVDs of concerts. But the official music videos get almost all of their value from their ability to promote the band.
Fan videos of concerts add a fantasy element, it feels more like you're at a concert when you can see the top of the head of the person in front of you, and the video is bouncing around with the music, etc.
They learn most of what they need to know from geological studies that are related to those explosives.
They already have good data, and well-developed statistical methods for processing it. AI here would only help on the margins, it wouldn't help them on deciding where to mine.
It would probably be useful for people who buy depleted mines and then find the nooks and crannies that have a little gold left. But the big boys have no need for it until it is so good that they don't have to hire geologists anymore.
Except people on slashdot seem to place having a 3.5mm headphone socket on their fondleslab above 'self-actualization' as the ultimate goal in life.
You may have that on its head. The company wants my money. I want a 3.5mm phone jack. Why do I need to give them my money at all ? Why do my conditions for when I would be willing to give them my money tell you something about my needs? I don't have any need to give out money for products I don't even want.
Or in terms of that chart you linked, I can focus on self-actualization and their desire to have my money doesn't even amount to a bump in the road or a bug on the windshield.
OTOH, my ability to manage the soundtrack that I live my life to assists my feelings of self-actualization. The ability to choose the products that I want supports that; getting talked into trying some new paradigm some company is pushing out, that doesn't assist me with anything on that chart at all! So if I have a preference for a 3.5mm phone jack, that chart says I should just buy a phone with one, and I win.
When you found short-term blah-blah in the data to point at, that is weather. Don't pretend to have done a statistical analysis; you didn't. You're not speaking statistically. You're just talking with your hands.
No deluge throttles your D/L if you throttle your U/L. I use Deluge when I'm seeding something, but not as my regular leacher.
Not correct. Many clients show preference for other clients that are actively uploading. If you don't even upload while you download then you're not a full participant in the swarm. Each client limits the number of other nodes that it connects to. Strong preference is of course given to clients that are available to download from.
For example, if you only connected to clients that were downloading, your own download stay at 0%, and you'd have nothing to share. When you're uploading fast enough to stay in another node's group of connected nodes, then you're both uploading and downloading at the same time, so you're both actively maintaining a spot in each other's connection pool. If you're only downloading, you're only downloading from the original seeder; and that person's client is trying to stay connected to the higher quality nodes that are distributing the data down the tree.
It is basic and obvious; you have to upload at some minimum speed on a per-node basic for those nodes to notice you exist and to consider you a useful part of the swarm. So turn down the max number of upload slots so that you can give full upload speed to a few nodes at a time, and you'll find those needs keep you in their connection pool more often.
Deluge gives you complete control over the fine details, you don't have to wonder if it is slowing you down. You just have to learn enough about the technology to figure out how to match the settings to your available resources. You probably only need to turn down the number of upload slots, so you're not spreading your upload bandwidth between too many connections and causing them all to think you're too slow. Even with 10% the upload bandwidth as download, this works really well and you should have no problems. Just make sure that you also have 10% the upload slots as download slots. It also helps in most cases to limit the total number of concurrent connections to under 100; I use 35 total, and 2 upload slots. I have no trouble using all my available download bandwidth with those settings, and my ratio stays really really low, I'm still mostly only leaching. And yet, torrents with low numbers of slow seeders, then my ratio goes up and everybody wins and we get our download.
I'm sure they do remember to pamper and powder it every day.
But I have a cheap, off-brand phone, and it has enough battery life that I don't have to do that. I can just wait until it gets low, and then the next time I'm near a USB charger, I charge it.
Having to do a specific step only a certain time of day to always have it pre-done might work fine for people doing it, but it is disruptive to demand that everybody do things that way, especially just to make their phone happy. I don't want to have to do anything differently in my life just to make a phone happy. It doesn't even have feelings.
I get hung up on even simpler things; what if I didn't remember to charge an extra, optional device, does that really mean I should go all day without music? Seems silly.
Remembering to charge one device should be enough; I mean, for people doing it that way, it does work well already.
You do NOT need a headphone jack PERIOD. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?
Different people have different needs and wants. Why is that so hard for Apple to grasp?
Yes, actually, Apple does understand that people having different wants makes it harder to grasp their money. They understand that all-too-well.
It is hard to find something people actually "need."
I mean, I knew a person who died, and the world didn't end.
Luckily, most actual 1/8" jacks were made during a 5 year period in the 1970s, and everything else that says 1/8th in is actually 3.5mm packaged for the US. :)
I have half a dozen 3.5mm to 6.35mm converters, mono and stereo, and all of them said 1/8" to 1/4" on the package. :)
So, while what you said is technically true, if you're going by the numbers on the product it will appear to be false. But if you grab a random plug near that size and it doesn't fit; don't force it! Look closer first.
I don't need a headphone jack.
But I want one. And I have one.
And in the future, I will still have one.
If I'm walking down the street listening to my headphones, and I decide to enter a store or library or something, I just unplug the headphones. This is configured to pause my media player. When I leave and I'm ready to listen to music again, I just plug the headphones back in, and it continues. Nothing to charge. No buttons to press. I don't need to unlock my screen first. Or after. Plugged in = playing, unplugged = pause. Simple, easy.
You're not going to improve on that until batteries are so good that you can build years of battery life into the headphones; and it will still be less convenient for most styles of headphones.
bittorrent is what people call the technology, so don't expect people to even know you're talking about somebody's Brandybrand(TM). They should choose a new brand, one that is whimsical instead of functional. That's true even if their old brand was originally whimsical before it became functional.
And in any case, deluge is way better.
The frog stuff is a weird myth, not a real thing.
That the story you're repeating claims to be based on something real is part of the myth, as with most myths.
The frog stuff is a weird myth, not a real thing.
...
Did you have any point, other than to give enough details to show you understand the point, but also to show that you're trying to distract from it by placing emphasis on historical dates that are misleading?
Wave your hands some more, but it shows that you do understand, and are trolling. You're splitting hairs not because the detail is relevant, but to make irrelevant details appear to contradict the claims. Pathetic waste of effort.
The context is already on your screen .
They don't keep your card, they pre authorise a large amount to cover your tab, ....
That's as much as I read. You already know that I've told you about a common practice. You're telling me, what? That you don't believe I exist, or you think I'm from another planet and just making it up?
I'm not interested in the comments of people who don't even comprehend that they're replying to people's actual, real-life experiences. If you don't believe that I experienced things the way I reported, why would you even reply?
If you had a different experience, say so; don't tell me my experience didn't happen.
Weather is not climate.
If that doesn't explain it to you... ask somebody else with more patience.
None of that matters, the judge found that plaintiffs hadn't been harmed. So it doesn't matter what the law is; there is no lawsuit.
If it is inappropriate or not isn't going to be discovered by claiming harm. You'd have to find some sort of forum where appropriateness can be considered, like in Congress.
The frog stuff is a weird myth, not a real thing.
It is true. Demand legacy software support. Go stable, go old.