The funniest part IMO was last week when the Republican leadership in the Senate proposed a "compromise" where the Democrats in the House would agree to spending on the wall. The very spending that same person was currently the one stopping!
Republicans love voting to spend money on the wall; as long as their sure there is somebody else in the process who has the "no" votes to stop them.;)
You're fighting on a hill that doesn't even exist.
He was blocked from spending money on releasing them.
You can't release people that are in US custody into Cuba without permission from Cuba. I mean, what are you thinking when you say "release?" You mean open the door to the cage, and let them walk out onto the military base? Now what? You're going to starve them to death by detaining them in the parking lot? You can't leave them on the military base and have "released" them, and Cuba wouldn't take them.
So you do have to spend money to release them at all; and if you're not allowed to release them in the US, you have to get permission from some country to release them there. People who were actually released, it was because they convinced a country to take them.
Without the ban on spending money, they'd do the normal thing in that situation; pay some other country to let them settle there. Easy solution, works out best for everybody. But that was not allowed by Congress.
You're right, but only because he isn't creative enough to get it done.
If Mexico was willing to pay for the work, they'd also probably be willing to get paid to do the work which means that he could have Mexico hire Mexicans, and use his executive powers and responsibilities over matters of National Security to allow them to cross the border by a few feet and do the construction.
It is true though that if you want to do the graft in dollars, then you need Congress to pork-barrel it for you.
Only immigrants with children born in the US (i.e. the US citizen) can receive public assistance. I would like to see the source for the 60% figure, that doesn't seem to be correct.
If you want a source, just check AM radio. He's repeating it almost word-for-word.
the answer is you cannot foresee all the possibilities, its not a controlled lab, even then surprising problems can arise that were not even considered in planning.
There is nothing you can do about possibilities that were unforeseen. Trains don't react fast enough for that to even be a thing. You would absolutely need planning for the human in the train to be able to do anything to solve some sort of problem.
Trains can't actually stop for stuff on the tracks. They stop too slowly. They stop after hitting something regardless of when you start applying the brakes. They have to stop so the authorities can do the required investigation, but the stopping distance/reaction time rarely matters.
Knowing when to speed up and slow down is done by reading the speed signs along the route, and hopefully following them. Accidents happen because they were ignoring the signs; either due to being macho assholes, or being distracted.
Computers are hard to distract, and are rarely programmed to be macho.
You didn't use enough words to actually say anything.
When you point at the names of technical things, it helps to say some words next to it with some kind of point.
This is because humans can't read your mind, and no, if other people had the same information, it doesn't imply that they'd also have the same thoughts as you. So you have to actually put content into your own words, instead of waving your hand and naming something.
There seems to be no obvious implication at all. Why would a person identify an Appeal to Authority fallacy, and then look up Warburg Effect? Seems like it would take a lot to connect these things.
So you'd be happy with a woozle wurt and bleeble blazzer? What?
I didn't say anything like that, man. Just because you didn't understand the words, doesn't mean I was providing you a Mad Libs. Instead of replacing the words you didn't understand, just look them up.
If when I say "weed" you think, "any plant I didn't want in my field," then you won't understand it.
Weeds are more politely called "pioneer plants." They specialize in growing in disturbed and depleted places. They're not in any place for the long haul.
Clover and field peas are almost completely the opposite of that.
Some weeds fix nitrogen but that just means they're plants, it doesn't mean that it improves the soil to have a whole field of them. Plant a field full of wild amaranth, and one with clover, and then at the end of the year do a soil analysis and see which field is ready for other crops. The weed field might just be getting worked by the weeds, it might not really be resting the way it way it would with peas or clover.
Low cost chicken appears not to be processed. For chicken they have in situ chemical processing. That's why it has some absurd percentage of added weight. There is likely a percentage on the package explaining to you that something like 17% of your bird isn't actually a bird, but some processing solution that they injected it with.
Try to buy a natural bird in the same store; it will be in a different aisle. And it will cost 3x as much.
You do know that Americans have an increased risk of colon cancer, though, right?
Keep waving your hands and pretending the studies that attempt to explain it are all wrong, without having another explanation. Don't expect anybody to care.
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly, and worse, they smell like cigarettes and vodka.
If you hyperlink the words of a lawyer, they're really the words of a lawyer. Like, for real, man.
they're
The funniest part IMO was last week when the Republican leadership in the Senate proposed a "compromise" where the Democrats in the House would agree to spending on the wall. The very spending that same person was currently the one stopping!
Republicans love voting to spend money on the wall; as long as their sure there is somebody else in the process who has the "no" votes to stop them. ;)
You're fighting on a hill that doesn't even exist.
He was blocked from spending money on releasing them.
You can't release people that are in US custody into Cuba without permission from Cuba. I mean, what are you thinking when you say "release?" You mean open the door to the cage, and let them walk out onto the military base? Now what? You're going to starve them to death by detaining them in the parking lot? You can't leave them on the military base and have "released" them, and Cuba wouldn't take them.
So you do have to spend money to release them at all; and if you're not allowed to release them in the US, you have to get permission from some country to release them there. People who were actually released, it was because they convinced a country to take them.
Without the ban on spending money, they'd do the normal thing in that situation; pay some other country to let them settle there. Easy solution, works out best for everybody. But that was not allowed by Congress.
You're right, but only because he isn't creative enough to get it done.
If Mexico was willing to pay for the work, they'd also probably be willing to get paid to do the work which means that he could have Mexico hire Mexicans, and use his executive powers and responsibilities over matters of National Security to allow them to cross the border by a few feet and do the construction.
It is true though that if you want to do the graft in dollars, then you need Congress to pork-barrel it for you.
You have to be pretty fucking exceptionally racist to look at a picture in California and still come up with that stereotype.
I mean, fuck-an-A that's bottom of the barrel stupid right there.
I'm also curious about the 60% figure, I can't seem to find anything about it.
You're not hating hard enough while you search. If you hate hard enough, the numbers will not only cite themselves at your command, they'll even grow.
Only immigrants with children born in the US (i.e. the US citizen) can receive public assistance. I would like to see the source for the 60% figure, that doesn't seem to be correct.
If you want a source, just check AM radio. He's repeating it almost word-for-word.
You're lying. Again.
Why are you a neo-nazi, anyways? Do you have a conversion story to share?
It already is mandatory. Did you think the monkeys were volunteers, or maybe they signed a waiver?
Exactly. If it really happened outside their lab, in their released version, that's no "experiment;" they really did it!
the answer is you cannot foresee all the possibilities, its not a controlled lab, even then surprising problems can arise that were not even considered in planning.
There is nothing you can do about possibilities that were unforeseen. Trains don't react fast enough for that to even be a thing. You would absolutely need planning for the human in the train to be able to do anything to solve some sort of problem.
Trains can't actually stop for stuff on the tracks. They stop too slowly. They stop after hitting something regardless of when you start applying the brakes. They have to stop so the authorities can do the required investigation, but the stopping distance/reaction time rarely matters.
Knowing when to speed up and slow down is done by reading the speed signs along the route, and hopefully following them. Accidents happen because they were ignoring the signs; either due to being macho assholes, or being distracted.
Computers are hard to distract, and are rarely programmed to be macho.
You didn't use enough words to actually say anything.
When you point at the names of technical things, it helps to say some words next to it with some kind of point.
This is because humans can't read your mind, and no, if other people had the same information, it doesn't imply that they'd also have the same thoughts as you. So you have to actually put content into your own words, instead of waving your hand and naming something.
There seems to be no obvious implication at all. Why would a person identify an Appeal to Authority fallacy, and then look up Warburg Effect? Seems like it would take a lot to connect these things.
Oh, how cute, he learned a new word!
Next, learn how to spell your new word.
So you'd be happy with a woozle wurt and bleeble blazzer? What?
I didn't say anything like that, man. Just because you didn't understand the words, doesn't mean I was providing you a Mad Libs. Instead of replacing the words you didn't understand, just look them up.
Clover and field peas are not weeds, though.
If when I say "weed" you think, "any plant I didn't want in my field," then you won't understand it.
Weeds are more politely called "pioneer plants." They specialize in growing in disturbed and depleted places. They're not in any place for the long haul.
Clover and field peas are almost completely the opposite of that.
Some weeds fix nitrogen but that just means they're plants, it doesn't mean that it improves the soil to have a whole field of them. Plant a field full of wild amaranth, and one with clover, and then at the end of the year do a soil analysis and see which field is ready for other crops. The weed field might just be getting worked by the weeds, it might not really be resting the way it way it would with peas or clover.
Literally, a bird's nest.
For Chinese bird's nest soup.
It is a mud nest made by a species of swallow, so basically mud and bird spit. The flavor is from the bird spit.
I've heard you can substitute other types of swallow nest.
But I've never actually eaten this soup.
Can you read?
Are you sure?
Completely sure, or do you merely suspect it is true?
Maybe you were simply told "good job" by a teacher once, and believed in meant you're literate?
Low cost chicken appears not to be processed. For chicken they have in situ chemical processing. That's why it has some absurd percentage of added weight. There is likely a percentage on the package explaining to you that something like 17% of your bird isn't actually a bird, but some processing solution that they injected it with.
Try to buy a natural bird in the same store; it will be in a different aisle. And it will cost 3x as much.
You forgot to say something. Oops? Did you confuse yourself talking about sports?
You do know that Americans have an increased risk of colon cancer, though, right?
Keep waving your hands and pretending the studies that attempt to explain it are all wrong, without having another explanation. Don't expect anybody to care.
Too stupid to reply to most of it, but:
'Merica only does what will make it money in the next ~5 nanoseconds.
Ever heard of the US Treasury Bonds?
Did you know we even have a financial sector?
That doesn't differentiate between anything, though.
We already had a word for the person that automates VM services; sysadmin.