I can agree with you on the movies, but music? If you mean mainstream, then don't look there often. There is, and has been, plenty of independent artists who are in many people's minds better than most pop (as in popular) artists.
really? I have not heard of any Facebook attacks. I am not likely to click ads because I know they are a waste, but spyware? *sigh* I wish Facebook would have stayed UC wide..
Blessed with greater creativity? I don't think so; you are just a "fanboy" who is regurgitating myths two fold: a group of people (Mac users) who have a certain property (enhanced creativity) and another group of people (non-Mac users) who have a the same property but in a lesser extent (zero creativity) and have an "associated squareness".
To counter your point that only a "Mac user" is capable of utilizing motion sensors creatively, and thus is more creative than a non-Mac user? First, Amit Singh is not simply a Mac user, although his primary OS is OSX, he is vastly interested in over 64 different OSes ( quote "In any case I am not too fond of the expression 'switched.'")
"Further examples," I suspect, contain the same logical falicy as your claim of a certain person (Mac user) being defined by their choice of product(Mac user, thus he/she must be creative).
I am certain you like Apple and your computer and your OS, and that is fine. Even to say that it is "better" than any other OS/Harware combination is fine, if properly debated; however, to outright claim that the -person- who is using this machine has (by some magical means perhaps?) "greater creativy" than one who is not is wrong.
Have you ever considered the creative people who never have or ever will use a computer?
Your contribution to this article contributes lies and misconceptions, far worse than nothing.
Slashdot Mirror
you can't save files with Japanese names on a FAT32 drive
Did somebody just say 'Weeaboo?' 'cause I think I just heard someone say 'Weeaboo'
I can agree with you on the movies, but music? If you mean mainstream, then don't look there often. There is, and has been, plenty of independent artists who are in many people's minds better than most pop (as in popular) artists.
really? I have not heard of any Facebook attacks. I am not likely to click ads because I know they are a waste, but spyware? *sigh* I wish Facebook would have stayed UC wide..
Blessed with greater creativity? I don't think so; you are just a "fanboy" who is regurgitating myths two fold: a group of people (Mac users) who have a certain property (enhanced creativity) and another group of people (non-Mac users) who have a the same property but in a lesser extent (zero creativity) and have an "associated squareness".
To counter your point that only a "Mac user" is capable of utilizing motion sensors creatively, and thus is more creative than a non-Mac user? First, Amit Singh is not simply a Mac user, although his primary OS is OSX, he is vastly interested in over 64 different OSes ( quote "In any case I am not too fond of the expression 'switched.'")
"Further examples," I suspect, contain the same logical falicy as your claim of a certain person (Mac user) being defined by their choice of product(Mac user, thus he/she must be creative).
I am certain you like Apple and your computer and your OS, and that is fine. Even to say that it is "better" than any other OS/Harware combination is fine, if properly debated; however, to outright claim that the -person- who is using this machine has (by some magical means perhaps?) "greater creativy" than one who is not is wrong.
Have you ever considered the creative people who never have or ever will use a computer?
Your contribution to this article contributes lies and misconceptions, far worse than nothing.