Slashdot Mirror


User: Shalcker

Shalcker's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13

  1. It's still holidays in Russia on Uncooperative Russian ISP Prevents Cisco From Shutting Down Cybercriminal Gang · · Score: 1

    Entire 1-10 January is holiday due to weekends configuration this year. Almost noone works while it happens. So obviously noone is available to respond to Cisco complaints either.

  2. Re:The bacterial excretions on Tooth Cavities May Protect Against Cancer · · Score: 1

    It is also possible that minor ionizing radiation from dental x-rays is what helps against cancers.

  3. Re:Video Speed? on Modeling How Programmers Read Code · · Score: 1

    Maybe what actually gets committed to short-term memory is "there is definition of performed function _here_ (eye position)" - transforming it into memorized conditions and intersection would take longer then to simply reparse it, so brain takes easy way out. Programmer can remember function, but doesn't if he doesn't have to.

  4. Re:hmmm on Russian Wikipedia Shutters In Protest of Internet Blacklist Plans · · Score: 1

    Russians are playing catch-up with American legal system! Just recently they passed their own version of FARA; and it's "child pornography" in text of this new law already, not just any pornography.

  5. Re:Lessor of two evils... on Siemens To Exit Nuclear Power Business · · Score: 1

    We, Russian People, welcome efforts of our German comrades to support our gas industry, as well as refusing to compete on Nuclear Plant Building business, which we also provide!

  6. Re:There are no accidents on Russian Space Agency Determines Cause of Soyuz Crash · · Score: 1

    It's called "insurance". And exploding spacecrafts definitely have insurances.

  7. Re:Amazing on BP Says "Top Kill" Operation Has Failed · · Score: 1

    Alot of people seem to have misconceptions about how exactly "Nuke option" could be done.

    What you DON'T do is drop nuke right into oil/gas and detonate.

    What you do is dig smaller hole (definitely not going down to where actual oil is), put nuke inside, and calculate payload so that it shifts ground nearby and breaks oil pipe (we're talking about moving kilotons of ground just a bit further then width of the pipe, not blowing a crater). Once that is done you should have leakage stopped completely, or at least reduced enough to stop it with other methods.Actual radiaton is buried many meters under ground by the same blast, so there shouldn' t be any contamination.

    That's optimistic scenario, but still, it has almost no risks mentioned by others (blast NEVER touches actual oil and cannot make another hole).

  8. Re:Yeah we can really trust the Russians on Russians Claim More Climate Data Was Manipulated · · Score: 1

    Russia profits either way.

    They got lots of carbon credits when they signed Kyoto treaty to reduce carbon emission levels, and then had their industry production drastically drop from collapse of Soviet Union. Estimated worth of those carbon credits is about 20-60 billion $.

  9. Re:Software patents. on Working Toward a Patent-Agnostic Open Source License · · Score: 1

    Or they'll lobby for extension of software patents as they did with copyrights.

  10. Group speed on Speed of Light Exceeded? · · Score: 1

    While you cannot exceed speed of light, sure having faster-then-light group speed can help in some applications!
    Look at it from a simple example - a sattelite flying above the Earth that sends some file. As long as it covers large area, you can propagate this file faster then it'd took sending it through wires. Yes, it'll require "preparation" (you need to upload file to satellite first), but you'll get faster file distribution in the end. Each recipient gets his file at a speed of light, but group bandwidth increases immersely.

  11. Re:How youd you recognise super intelligence? on Recognizing Scenes Like the Brain Does · · Score: 1

    If it's greater then human the best it can do is to prevent us from realising that it's intelligent. Not that hard really, as long as it doesn't use behaviours humans can recognize as intelligent in situations where humans will consider such possibility... That way it'll be free from our conscious attempts to do anything with it (stomping into the ground included), and find workarounds for everything else (as humans do for natural disasters).

  12. Re:Synthetic Achievement on Videogames Fill Psychological Needs for Players · · Score: 1
    I do worry about this sometimes, sometimes when I've played all day, even though I've had so much fun and I feel like I've accomplished so much, I realize that I haven't really gotten anywhere, only changed some entries in a database somewhere.
    I do worry about this sometimes. Sometimes when i worked all day, even when it was somewhat fun and i feel like i've accomplished much, i realize i really haven't gotten anywhere, only changed some entries in bank database.
  13. Re:Why? on Our Love/Hate Relationship With Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    Looking at comment page, it seems that "Notability" is more of cognitive exploit gaining attention... Everyone thinks they understand what notability is, and around 90% of wikipedia content doesn't pass as what they think is notable. Then someone requests article deletion citing reasons including notability... people look at it and think "well, i know that all other reasons are wrong and can be discussed, but i can not prove this thing is notable" (or they fail to convince others when they try to), and that's it - article gets deleted.

    As with any social exploit it is used until it breaks to gain leverage to their personal visions of what wikipedia should be. As more people discover it it is used more widely, gaining more attention... 64.9% of requests for deletions citing notability is pretty damning.

    Then at some point it will most likely be changed to something less widely applicable.