You can save a bookmark to a web page on your home screen. If that web page has a <meta name="apple-mobile-web-app-capable" content="yes"> then it launches in a full screen (no status bar) chromeless window without the safari interface.
Yeah, I really HATE it when a search engine collates data for me and tells me *exactly* where it got that informati.. oh wait, I may have missed your point
Our goals remain the same: the first and foremost of which is to keep improving the core features — speed, security, accessibility and stability — that our 275+ million users have come to depend on.
Assuming that having an ungameable system is the holy grail, you could argue that actually it's just taken 15 years longer for people to game the system faster than Google are stopping them
Oh yeah and as a bonus if you don't run Google's JS you get the actual URLs of the search results and not some redirection server that helps to track you.
Yeah, I really hate it when a company looking to improve search results tries to find out which search results the user ends up choosing!
Sure you have that choice. In fact, if you do any business I would think a significant proportion of it is with iDevice owners.
But you're right, you don't have the choice to do business with iDevice owners in the Apple App market without doing business with Apple. So you're basically annoyed that to enter the market you want to enter, you would have to make some concessions you don't want to make. And that's fine, plenty of businesses have the same dilemma in different markets. And, if they don't like that, they don't enter that market!
I'm not entirely sure how showing "a graphic of Safari's address bar with a totally legit URL" (which you suggest) is "even better" than showing a graphic of Safari's address bar with a totally legit URL (which is what the article describes)
Well, the problem being exposed isn't related to the login form and password sniffing, but merely that after login a stolen session cookie gives you full access to someone's logged-in session (as it is in fact designed to)
The problem is potentially less of an issue than having the password submission over HTTP - once you have a user's Facebook password, chances are you have the password to some of their other online accounts, whereas this attack only gives you access to the current logged in session - but it's definitely an issue that users needs to be aware of
I should mention that the entire team was very green. 8 of us had never worked on a game. Andy Smith had worked on a few at Rare. I had worked on one at Rare and written countless games back in prehistory as a hobbyist, but those one-person games don't count really do they? But overall the team was very talented and very dedicated. When I selected people I was looking for three things: talent in their field (obviously), an affection for the Bond universe, and a deep understanding of games. Six of the people on the project could easily be given the job title game designer. This is a ridiculously high ratio, and explains a lot. One person can't design an original game, it just isn't humanly possible. Six have a chance, with proper coordination. Regarding dedication, several of us commonly did 80 hour weeks and occasional 120 hour weeks. I averaged an 80 hour week over the 2 and a half years of the project. The talent and dedication of the team was pivotal to the quality of the game. One more reason for success.
Slashdot Mirror
You can save a bookmark to a web page on your home screen. If that web page has a <meta name="apple-mobile-web-app-capable" content="yes"> then it launches in a full screen (no status bar) chromeless window without the safari interface.
Apparently it also runs slower if you do that.
The answers are only there if you click through from a Google search result. Copy the URL into a fresh tab and watch the answer magically vanish!
Yeah, I really HATE it when a search engine collates data for me and tells me *exactly* where it got that informati.. oh wait, I may have missed your point
Yes. And then some:
- May 12, 2010
That's a very insightful comment*
*contraction
The problem isn't the porn sites which are obviously adult content, it's the sites which are closer to the line, maybe lingerie shops?
Once you have a .sex TLD, you're introducing a binary classification to a scale which is not only analogue, but highly subjective.
I've heard an early reviewer describe this as the best Daft Punk music video he's ever seen
Are you sure it's not the other way around?
Assuming that having an ungameable system is the holy grail, you could argue that actually it's just taken 15 years longer for people to game the system faster than Google are stopping them
Oh yeah and as a bonus if you don't run Google's JS you get the actual URLs of the search results and not some redirection server that helps to track you.
Yeah, I really hate it when a company looking to improve search results tries to find out which search results the user ends up choosing!
Sure you have that choice. In fact, if you do any business I would think a significant proportion of it is with iDevice owners.
But you're right, you don't have the choice to do business with iDevice owners in the Apple App market without doing business with Apple. So you're basically annoyed that to enter the market you want to enter, you would have to make some concessions you don't want to make. And that's fine, plenty of businesses have the same dilemma in different markets. And, if they don't like that, they don't enter that market!
With blackjack! And hookers! In fact, forget the search engine!
I'm not entirely sure how showing "a graphic of Safari's address bar with a totally legit URL" (which you suggest) is "even better" than showing a graphic of Safari's address bar with a totally legit URL (which is what the article describes)
That copy of Windows had protection which had to be broken.
This Kinect protocol didn't.
Actually, it always takes me 3 attempts to plug a USB device in, if I can't see the port. It defies all logic
http://www.wikihow.com/Pronounce-the-Letters-of-the-French-Alphabet
thetrainline.com app certainly didn't tell you whether your train was on time or running late last time I checked. Does it now?
No, because as the first 4 words of the summary states, they are electric vans
My favourite part was where you didn't even RTF *title*
My favourite part was where you didn't even read the *title*
Not necessarily true, Google have a solution which means that
Well, the problem being exposed isn't related to the login form and password sniffing, but merely that after login a stolen session cookie gives you full access to someone's logged-in session (as it is in fact designed to) The problem is potentially less of an issue than having the password submission over HTTP - once you have a user's Facebook password, chances are you have the password to some of their other online accounts, whereas this attack only gives you access to the current logged in session - but it's definitely an issue that users needs to be aware of
Likewise on Mac, where every native Print window has options for preview and PDF
Interesting to note that Goldeneye 007 for the N64 was developed almost entirely by developers working on their first game:
No, most people are either better or worse than average. Very few are actually average
It's better to add it as a Jabber account than as a Facebook account - see http://www.facebook.com/sitetour/chat.php for the connection details