No. Only those that require a "checkout; modify; check in" work pattern. Git, SVN and others follow a "modify, merge, commit" pattern which requires no locking. Though SVN can be configured to "require" (more like "request") locking on binary files which would help.
That's "Normal" quality? That could be *very* misleading. If you have an option that has negative side-effects such as this then the option should be titled something to indicate the risk - "Super-compressed", "dangerously small" or the like.
Though I'm surprised Xerox would even allow such a compression if such an obvious issue occurs. People would expect image quality to suffer - but full character substitution?
You also swear an oath to defend the constitution from all enemies. If you feel that your oath to protect papers violates your oath to defend the constitution which do you go with?
He's had a lot to do with expanding it. I mean after he closed gitmo, er, stopped the war in, er, made for a more transparent government, er, hrm. HOW was he better than the other option again?
I'm not sure I follow. By your logic does the US mint "just make rectangular pieces of paper?" And if people *happen* to use them as currency then that's up to them?
Bitcoin's own website calls it "an open source P2P digital currency."
I thought so as well until I really started using git. Now I *never* accidentally commit my changes to log4j.xml where I turned up debugging while I worked out an issue. It forces me to think about what I'm committing. You may be wonderful and do that automatically (in which case you can create an alias which does it for you) but for us mortals it's quite useful.
He did go up the chain of the command. If we are indeed still a democracy then the people are the highest authority and ought to have a right to know what its government is doing.
As a Java developer let me just say - God I hate Oracle... Can't we just turn Java over to the Apache project now? They would be far better stewards of the technology. Christ *anybody* would probably be a better steward of it than Oracle.
I'll say it again for the remedial English crowd. That Linux *does* force you edit config files more often than Windows forces you to make manual registry changes.
The person I replied to said "You are not forced to edit config files any more often than windows forces you to make manual registry changes" which is demonstrably wrong as my example shows.
Slashdot Mirror
As shown here:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c2557a303ab6712bb6e09447df828c557c710ac9
It's part of the pool.
No. Only those that require a "checkout; modify; check in" work pattern. Git, SVN and others follow a "modify, merge, commit" pattern which requires no locking. Though SVN can be configured to "require" (more like "request") locking on binary files which would help.
Then you're not looking the other person in the eyes. Hence no "eye-contact."
Yes, the good old "shut your site down to gain publicity and traffic to your now shut-down site" trick.
You know Google provides advertisement services right? It's not just a search engine anymore.
I'd be willing to bet that those who are interested in these files have been notified.
That's "Normal" quality? That could be *very* misleading. If you have an option that has negative side-effects such as this then the option should be titled something to indicate the risk - "Super-compressed", "dangerously small" or the like.
Though I'm surprised Xerox would even allow such a compression if such an obvious issue occurs. People would expect image quality to suffer - but full character substitution?
A $12,000 scanner/printer is "consumer level?"
You also swear an oath to defend the constitution from all enemies. If you feel that your oath to protect papers violates your oath to defend the constitution which do you go with?
Why are you all feeding the troll? Let the moderation work and ignore the asshole.
He's had a lot to do with expanding it. I mean after he closed gitmo, er, stopped the war in, er, made for a more transparent government, er, hrm. HOW was he better than the other option again?
To me it's still the best RTS ever created.
I'm not sure I follow. By your logic does the US mint "just make rectangular pieces of paper?" And if people *happen* to use them as currency then that's up to them?
Bitcoin's own website calls it "an open source P2P digital currency."
I thought so as well until I really started using git. Now I *never* accidentally commit my changes to log4j.xml where I turned up debugging while I worked out an issue. It forces me to think about what I'm committing. You may be wonderful and do that automatically (in which case you can create an alias which does it for you) but for us mortals it's quite useful.
He did go up the chain of the command. If we are indeed still a democracy then the people are the highest authority and ought to have a right to know what its government is doing.
Seriously - they're going to need *somewhere* to store all our info.
As a Java developer let me just say - God I hate Oracle... Can't we just turn Java over to the Apache project now? They would be far better stewards of the technology. Christ *anybody* would probably be a better steward of it than Oracle.
Fine - change your video driver then without editing xorg.conf. Like, say, to change from a generic VESA driver to the nvidia driver.
I'll say it again for the remedial English crowd. That Linux *does* force you edit config files more often than Windows forces you to make manual registry changes.
You misunderstand *completely*.
The person I replied to said "You are not forced to edit config files any more often than windows forces you to make manual registry changes" which is demonstrably wrong as my example shows.
What I prefer has NOTHING to do with it.
A "permanent" mount point?
Careful with those arguments! They're antiques!
How do I setup an NFS mount point under Linux without editing /etc/fstab by hand?
My KINGDOM for some mod-points!
Sometimes you realize that the long-term maintainability of the re-write is worth it though. Especially if the original is confusing or buggy.