This assumes on critical item, that terrorists are infact targeting airplanes. Lack of falling/exploding/crashing planes and lack of disrupted attacks show that isn't and ongoing concern. We have greatly reduced the capacity of the Islamic Terrorists to project their warfare into our homeland. They don't seem to be pushing even probing attacks at our aircraft. As you stated there are many, many soft targets. Yet, none of them are being hit. Granted when they stop fighting internally in Asia and Africa we will have a stronger, better armed, more resourceful opponent attacking us. The Islamist's aren't dumb, but they are religious fanatics. They will find weakness and they will exploit it, but I doubt they are seriously considering planes any longer.
Your friend sounds amazingly successful. All his needs are met and he has a ton of leisure time, sounds like really low stress. Success isn't all dollars and cents.
One would imagine that drugs have a much higher margin then jammers. They certainly have a much more valuable market. The Juice is worth the Squeeze there. With Jammers, idk, but probably not so much.
But you see how you owning the indivdual parts that each have many legitimate uses is a seperate thing from owning a single use product that only has the ability to function in an illegal manner?
Jammers / Spoofers should only be available for military usage, no exceptions.
Careful, any Libertarian nut worth his tin foil hat is now going to claim that ownership and operation should now be protected by the 2nd Amendment, so they can pretend that they have the ability to rise up in rebellion.
I fought in Afganastan, there was some basis, like Syria, but it was kinda thin. The vast majority of the bad guys came from the House of Saud, but there isn't real fidellity on wha state actors were involved. Afganastan certainly tried to shelter Osama after the fact, but was protecting him from procectution a valid cause for the longest war in US history?
Yeah Bush 2 was a doucher. But Obama has followed suit. Afganastan had about as much validation as Syria. I'll bow to your comments on invasion being the wrong term. How about Act of War against a nation that posed no threat?
We violated their airspace and blew shit up. That is invasion. Our "allies" won on the ground. Syria, he asked congress for permission to retaliate against them for using chemical weapons, he was shot down. It was a pretty big deal.
I appreciate that if party affiliation clouds how we use words. But if Bush 2 did it, would you have approved?
Better yet, you can remotely execute pre-installed code. Think less of information gathering and more of weaponizing.
If I may be really long winded, let's imagine a system where there is a secure machine that is air gapped by say 30" from a non secured machine. The secure machine has privilleged access to $Doomsday_weapon_001, let's say a missle or better yet the control surface of a critical peice of infrastructure. Once infection has occured, and a payload delivered the two machines can lay in wait. At a particular time, like superbowl, the unsecure machine tells the secure machine to execute a preplanned attack using $Doomsday_weapon_001. The conversation can be really short less then a second or so, and boom goes the dynamite.
Leaking information onto secure systems is alot less complex then leaking information off. Why keylog when you can actully use the asset directly.
I haven't been able to sluice out a diffrence between the two, aside from Reagan's healthcare plan. The speeches are wildly diffrent, but not the actions.
Slashdot Mirror
Come on, it was constructed for the purpose of exchanging illegal goods and services.
#meta
This assumes on critical item, that terrorists are infact targeting airplanes. Lack of falling/exploding/crashing planes and lack of disrupted attacks show that isn't and ongoing concern. We have greatly reduced the capacity of the Islamic Terrorists to project their warfare into our homeland. They don't seem to be pushing even probing attacks at our aircraft. As you stated there are many, many soft targets. Yet, none of them are being hit. Granted when they stop fighting internally in Asia and Africa we will have a stronger, better armed, more resourceful opponent attacking us. The Islamist's aren't dumb, but they are religious fanatics. They will find weakness and they will exploit it, but I doubt they are seriously considering planes any longer.
*true AI
What we demand of AI to call it true AT keeps moving aswell.
Nobody, of any value to humanity, but Americans talk about religion in science.
The rest of the planet doesn't care about old men in the sky.
ffty
The others just palgerize.
+1 funny
Your friend sounds amazingly successful. All his needs are met and he has a ton of leisure time, sounds like really low stress. Success isn't all dollars and cents.
Don't waste your money. Once the solar freaking roadways hit mass production we won't need diesel any more.
ftfy
The Yakuza always get paid.
Or seize assets within reach of the Government.
Yeah, a Libertarian, not conforming with those pesky laws that society agreed upon. Who could have imagined that?
Due process?
One would imagine that drugs have a much higher margin then jammers. They certainly have a much more valuable market. The Juice is worth the Squeeze there. With Jammers, idk, but probably not so much.
But you see how you owning the indivdual parts that each have many legitimate uses is a seperate thing from owning a single use product that only has the ability to function in an illegal manner?
Jammers / Spoofers should only be available for military usage, no exceptions.
Careful, any Libertarian nut worth his tin foil hat is now going to claim that ownership and operation should now be protected by the 2nd Amendment, so they can pretend that they have the ability to rise up in rebellion.
They can cook the hell out of a hot dog, too.
goose meet gander
I fought in Afganastan, there was some basis, like Syria, but it was kinda thin. The vast majority of the bad guys came from the House of Saud, but there isn't real fidellity on wha state actors were involved. Afganastan certainly tried to shelter Osama after the fact, but was protecting him from procectution a valid cause for the longest war in US history?
Yeah Bush 2 was a doucher. But Obama has followed suit. Afganastan had about as much validation as Syria. I'll bow to your comments on invasion being the wrong term. How about Act of War against a nation that posed no threat?
We violated their airspace and blew shit up. That is invasion. Our "allies" won on the ground. Syria, he asked congress for permission to retaliate against them for using chemical weapons, he was shot down. It was a pretty big deal.
I appreciate that if party affiliation clouds how we use words. But if Bush 2 did it, would you have approved?
Better yet, you can remotely execute pre-installed code. Think less of information gathering and more of weaponizing.
If I may be really long winded, let's imagine a system where there is a secure machine that is air gapped by say 30" from a non secured machine. The secure machine has privilleged access to $Doomsday_weapon_001, let's say a missle or better yet the control surface of a critical peice of infrastructure. Once infection has occured, and a payload delivered the two machines can lay in wait. At a particular time, like superbowl, the unsecure machine tells the secure machine to execute a preplanned attack using $Doomsday_weapon_001. The conversation can be really short less then a second or so, and boom goes the dynamite.
Leaking information onto secure systems is alot less complex then leaking information off. Why keylog when you can actully use the asset directly.
He tried with syria, and got a quick victory in libia.
I haven't been able to sluice out a diffrence between the two, aside from Reagan's healthcare plan. The speeches are wildly diffrent, but not the actions.