Slashdot Mirror


Match.com, Mensa Create Dating Site For Geniuses

mpicpp writes in with news about a new dating opportunity for Mensa members. It takes a special person to join Mensa. For one, the elite society only takes individuals with IQ scores in the 98th percentile, meaning just 1 in 50 Americans is eligible. This exclusivity — some might say snobbery — is part of Mensa's lore. Early Mensans in Britain walked around with yellow buttons, organizational publications once referred to non-Mensa members as "Densans," and last year, a top Mensa member and tester called anyone with an IQ of 60 a "carrot." In short, you don't always join Mensa because you think you're smart. You join to be set apart from most people, who are, as one member put it: "mundane." But a new partnership between American Mensa and online dating giant Match.com offers a new, enticing reason to join the society of geniuses: true love. Beginning this week, members of the brainiac group can connect through a separate, exclusive dating service called Mensa Match. In addition, Match.com members can add a special Mensa badge to their profiles, signaling a specific interest in connecting with a single person with a confirmed genius-level IQ score.

561 comments

  1. why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm smart, maybe not mensa smart (don't really care either way) but fuck hanging out with other aholes like me!

    1. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      I joined Mensa in 1988 to meet chicks

      WTF!?! AHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up Insightful +1.

      I don't want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member.

    3. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Me too! But in 2000.

      I went to a few gatherings and it was mostly fat libertarian dudes.

      Then I realized only a fuckhead would join mensa for intellectual validation.

      Then I realized I was one of those fuckheads and promptly re-examined my life.

      I joined the triple nine society and am much happier. /s

    4. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm smart, maybe not mensa smart (don't really care either way) but fuck hanging out with other aholes like me!

      OP is a bit snobbish itself.

      People (by and large... certainly there are exceptions) join MENSA so that they can converse with other people with similar mental character and interests. Just exactly how some people join motorcycle clubs because they like motorcycles and want to discuss them and appreciate them with people of similar interest, someone might join MENSA because they like talking about physics -- or even crossword puzzles -- with people who are like themselves.

      There is no need to try to suggest that is "snobbery" of any kind. Would you call a motorcycle gang "snobs"? Or stamp collectors? MENSA is a social club, nothing more.

      And by the way, a bit of history: MENSA members did sometimes wear small yellow pins, like tie tacks but about 1/8" diameter, like those little pins you stick in maps -- not badges -- simply so that they could find each other in a crowd. It wasn't snobbery, it was subtle (very subtle) identification. The reason was because more obvious identification made them targets of violence for bigots and other idiots.

    5. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would you call a motorcycle gang "snobs"?

      Well, probably not if you want to survive the day...

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    6. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, people who ride motorcycles are unarguably better.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    7. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Way too much truth here. I passed their exam to satisfy my curiosity but figured I'd find them as boring as I find myself after surfing their forums at the time. As far as the chicks go (recalling my days in Uni), a well-maintained genius is so outnumbered by men I would have better luck going for supermodels interested in money. The truth is everyone is an idiot in a demonstrable way, and the ideal match is the one who can find the humor in the ways their partner is just bloody hopeless.

    8. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then I realized only a fuckhead would join mensa for intellectual validation.

      Then I realized I was one of those fuckheads and promptly re-examined my life.

      Yep. If you joined MENSA for "intellectual validation", you were indeed a fuckhead. They ADVERTISE that's not what they're all about. so why did you think they were?

    9. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Would you call a motorcycle gang "snobs"?

      you mean to their face?

    10. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Groups of motorcycle enthusiasts and stamp collectors are distinguished from MENSA. You see, the former have a specific interest in mind - they are interested in motorcycles or stamp collecting. MENSA does not have a specific interest -- there's a snobbery that people with high IQ would have more insights or more to say about a particular topic. Do you think because of someone's IQ score they would have a vaster knowledge of stamp collecting or bodybuilding? MENSA makes some bold assumptions regarding IQ and is incredibly pompous in doing so.

    11. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      'cause they infact are?

    12. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think he meant "slobs".

    13. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not lying. An IQ test is required for membership. A proper one, not an online one.

      Though it's arguable how useful an IQ test is. It's a poor metric of intelligence, it's just commonly used because all the other suggestions are worse.

    14. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I wanted to join a motorcycle club or a stamp collector club I'd be welcomed without any qualification. My interest would be enough. They'd be delighted to tell me about their bikes or stamps and encourage me to learn more. They'd probably be a little surprised if I didn't have a bike or a stamp collection, but they'd encourage me to get one and not look down their nose at me if I didn't have one.

    15. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by gsslay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      so that they can converse with other people with similar mental character and interests

      It's a fair point, but what exactly is being shared? Having a shared high IQ is no guarantee at all of the shared or compatible interests, personality, life aims or values. All the kind of stuff that helps in a social club, and relationship most definitely needs.

      The only thing they have in common is an interest in knowing how smart they, and other people are, by one particular yardstick. As interest go, that's pretty shallow.

    16. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm smart, maybe not mensa smart (don't really care either way) but fuck hanging out with other aholes like me!

      You, sir, are a carrot.

    17. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People (by and large... certainly there are exceptions) join MENSA so that they can converse with other people with similar mental character and interests.

      People who are smart in any sort of useful way get to converse with other people with similar mental character and interests at work. If you've had to join Mensa to find other smart people to talk to, then either something has gone very badly wrong in your career, or you're not actually very smart, just good at IQ tests.

    18. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by mcvos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is no need to try to suggest that is "snobbery" of any kind. Would you call a motorcycle gang "snobs"? Or stamp collectors? MENSA is a social club, nothing more.

      Exactly. I don't know much about Mensa, because I've never felt the need to join. I'm pretty sure most of the people around me would qualify, but that also means that we already have plenty of smart people to have intellectual discussions with. My sister, however, studied sports, got surrounded by other sporty people, and eventually started to miss contact with other smart people, so she joined Mensa, and now she talks about all the game events and motorcycle trips they have and all the interesting people she meets there. It fills a need for her that for me is already filled in other ways.

    19. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by mcvos · · Score: 1

      There are motorcycle groups within Mensa. How's that for snobbery?

    20. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jcr · · Score: 1

      The big lie is the claim that IQ means anything.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    21. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jcr · · Score: 1

      Cute kid, but what a completely useless thing to memorize.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    22. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'd probably be a little surprised if I didn't have a bike or a stamp collection, but they'd encourage me to get one and not look down their nose at me if I didn't have one.

      Probably true in the case of the stamp collection, in basically all cases. But a lot of motorcyclists will look down on you for driving a 'cage' down the road.

      I personally enjoy a cage when it is a roll cage, but different strokes [across a cheese grater] for different folks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another appeal to vanity. For $70/yr. How smart can you be? On the other hand, many people are terrified by stupid. Stupid has survival factor, so smart people form colonies as a defense. It isn't working.
        Stupid has NO fees or even membership requirements. Sooner or later you will do something stupid. Then you are in. Maybe if we put a tax on stupid we could balance the budget. -

    24. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by kimvette · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Though it's arguable how useful an IQ test is. It's a poor metric of intelligence, it's just commonly used because all the other suggestions are worse.

      I agree, One time in line at a grocery store one man remarked about how it was stupid they had "retards"[sic] working there. I told him "You can learn from anybody, even this so-called 'retard.' for example, notice he is treating everybody with respect. You know, come to think of it, I never met anyone with Down's syndrome who is a nasty and judgmental prick like you. Maybe we can all take a lesson and learn to treat others nicely."

      Besides, he was doing a great job and was taking pride in his work. What's to judge? What if that asshole were in the position of being mentally challenged - I'd love to see him wear those shoes for a day.

      What good is intelligence if all one ends up doing is thinking they're better than everyone and treat others like shit?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    25. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jythie · · Score: 1

      "worse" is pretty relative. IQ tests were designed around a certain type of person and how well other people stack up to them. It is little better then presenting someone with a complex dining spread and seeing what order they use the forks in.

    26. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jythie · · Score: 1

      Actually, yeah, I would call quite a few motorcycle clubs snobs. Any social club that builds an identity around "we are doing things the twue way" rather then "hey, we just like each other and hang out" is snobby, and mensa is pretty infamous for that attitude.

    27. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jythie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is why hanging out with mensa people drove me crazy, not only are they arm-chair everything but their organization encourages their belief that they understand things they do not and non-members don:t.

    28. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jythie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but often they will happily hook you up with their favorite dealer or someone they know trying to unload an old bike. I have yet to see a mensa member say "oh, you did not pass the IQ test, but I think it is cool that you want to go in so here are some things that will get you going".

    29. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no need to try to suggest that is "snobbery" of any kind. "

      Yes there is. The idea that you have to join a club to meet people of your intellectual caliber is snobbery. If you think you can't find anyone smarter than you in every day social settings then: 1) you either don't get out much 2) you are not as smart as you think you are.

    30. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're discussing high intelligence and you admit to believing what an advert says?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IQ is a measure of abstract cognitive ability (and to a small extent training). It doesn't mean much beyond that. It's fairly repeatable though: People don't beat their own scores by much no matter how much they train for it. So it's rather disingenuous to say it doesn't mean anything at all.

    32. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but often they will happily hook you up with their favorite dealer or someone they know trying to unload an old bike. I have yet to see a mensa member say "oh, you did not pass the IQ test, but I think it is cool that you want to go in so here are some things that will get you going".

      And I've yet to hear a biker say "oh, you did not pass your motorcycle driving test, but I think it's cool so here's my custom bike for you to take for a spin."

      Qualifications are qualifications. The snobbish part is treating those differently simply because we're talking about Mensa here. One does have to perform certain tasks or achieve certain levels of certification to become a member of either.

      Ironically, I'd challenge most Mensa members to see if they qualify to drive a motorcycle. Then perhaps we can talk about snobbery as they amaze us with mathematical wizardry but cannot seem to grasp the simple physics behind two wheels.

    33. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP is a bit snobbish itself.

      Classic projection. OP is joking. That's the kind of sense of humour failure you only get from snobs.

      Just exactly how some people join motorcycle clubs because they like motorcycles and want to discuss them and appreciate them with people of similar interest, someone might join MENSA because they like talking about physics -- or even crossword puzzles -- with people who are like themselves.

      Bullshit, Mensa isn't a physics club, or a crossword club, it's a smartness club. People join motorcycle clubs because they like motorcycles and want to discuss them. People join smartness clubs because they like smartness and want to discuss it. Its members are defined by smartness (according to some very old, culture-biased and long-discredited measure of smartness), and presumably a complete lack of social skills (a) to manage to meet other like-minded people without paying a fortune for an IQ test and (b) to realize why wearing a Mensa badge is going to make most people hate you (if you think that's bigotry, you're the idiot).

    34. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just one carrot short of Mensa "status". :)
      In real life, Mensa sound like the kind of snobby club I would avoid anyway. I might never know. And yes, 99% of the people around me are certifiably (i.e. IMHO) dense.

    35. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to join a motorcycle club or a stamp collector club I'd be welcomed without any qualification. My interest would be enough. They'd be delighted to tell me about their bikes or stamps and encourage me to learn more. They'd probably be a little surprised if I didn't have a bike or a stamp collection, but they'd encourage me to get one and not look down their nose at me if I didn't have one.

      It seems the one qualification you overlooked when joining a motorcycle club is a motorcycle license or permit.

      And yes, that is enough of a differentiation to have those within that group look at you differently when you walk up and want to ride without one.

      It also makes it difficult to compare to stamp collectors. They're likely just excited to find anyone else who knows stamp collecting is even a hobby. Therefore, you passed the qualifications already.

    36. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Most motorcycle geeks I know would enthusiastically support you in acquiring a motorcycle permit or licence.

    37. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by C0R1D4N · · Score: 2

      It's not stupid they have them there, but it is usually exploitative. http://fortune.com/2014/02/12/...

    38. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Seeing as most clever people are not members of Mensa, seeking the group out as a way to find intelligent people doesn't make much sense, as there are easier ways to find intelligent people interested in, say, physics or crosswords - physics or crossword groups. Your analogy with a motorcycle club is a bit silly, as your point about Mensa seems to be saying if any intelligent person wants to discuss motorcycles with intelligent people, they should join Mensa instead of motorcycle clubs...

      So yeah, it is snobbery, as a synonym of snobbery is "elitism", which Mensa is by its very definition.

      Let me guess - are you a Mensa member?

    39. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start from the inside and work your way out ;-) (And since tone doesn't always come through, yes, this is a smart ass response to an obviously rhetorical question)

    40. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      I don't think that intelligence (perceived or not) is equatable to a hobby.You can't get "more intelligent" and those few that are true blue geniuses didn't just start being a genius the way you or I go out and start stamp collection. It's a biological trait, not a sociological construct.

    41. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      SetIntersection(smart, likesMotorcycles) ?

      INCONCEIVABLE.

    42. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you sure are edgy!!!!

    43. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      Today's XKCD is timely.
      http://xkcd.com/1386/

    44. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      There's a whole lot more snobbery going on in motorcycle clubs IMHO. If you try to join a Harley group in anything other than a Harley, good fscking luck. Try joining a sport motorcycle club with a cruiser, or a small cc standard.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    45. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by AnOnyxMouseCoward · · Score: 2

      No, no biker will you his/her custom bike if you can't ride one, that's called being stupid. He might say though "oh, you're interested but don't have your permit? Here's this great school I heard of..."

      Qualification for biking, stamp collecting, or whatever, is showing enough interest and putting enough time/practice. Anyone, barring disability, can learn to ride a bike if he/she wants to. It's pretty damn hard inching your IQ from the 50th percentile to the 98th, however. This is exactly the same as a club for people 6'1 or taller, which is.. fine? It's just "hey I was born this way, how great." and has very little to do with interest, more with your intrinsic characteristics. Now if you want to call "snobbery" an interest...

    46. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the simple physics behind two wheels.

      Ride around whilst holding only the throttle. Eventually, one will discover how to push the tiller and modulate the throttle properly.
      It is disturbing/frightening to see so many fools riding around nowadays that do not know how to steer a gyroscope. A physicist would understand why it is so.

    47. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also says that they're sufficiently insecure that they'll mod you down rather than try to make an argument that it's anything other than "a club for white people".

    48. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but often they will happily hook you up with their favorite dealer or someone they know trying to unload an old bike. I have yet to see a mensa member say "oh, you did not pass the IQ test, but I think it is cool that you want to go in so here are some things that will get you going".

      Yeah those fuckfaces wouldnt tell me the answer to #37 on the test.

    49. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I once tried to join Mensa. I tried the test me and they told me my brain wasn't good enough. When I asked if a brain transplant would help, they looked at me as if I was an idiot.

    50. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too! But in 2000.

      I went to a few gatherings and it was mostly fat libertarian dudes.

      Then I realized only a fuckhead would join mensa for intellectual validation.

      Then I realized I was one of those fuckheads and promptly re-examined my life.

      I joined the triple nine society and am much happier. /s

      Right, because triple nine people are certainly not cunts.

    51. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      People (by and large... certainly there are exceptions) join MENSA so that they can converse with other people with similar mental character and interests.

      Pretty much this. As an example, Throughout my life and career I've been very fast on "uptake". Even in high school, I'd read the textbooks, and then sit in class, kinda bored.

      In my career, it continued. Oddly that was around a lot of intelligent people. But while most concepts needed explained several times, I had figured out what the speaker said and meant the first time he said it. An awkward world, being both interested and bored at the same time.

      Point is, it isn't about snobbery. If I were to draw a car analogy, it would be like driving a Ferrari down I-5 in rush hour, then magically being transported to the Autobahn. Suddenly, not the stops, suddenly you can communicate at high speed without waiting for the others to catch up. Dialup versus fiber.

      I only ever worked with three people who had to ability to kick in the mental afterburners like that - two women, both graphic artists, and a third young lady, a student summer intern whose major was history. As the latter put it once, "It can get a little frustrating when you'd like to talk about a fascinating book you just read, but all your family will talk about is NASCAR."

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    52. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I realized only a fuckhead would join mensa for intellectual validation.

      Then I realized I was one of those fuckheads and promptly re-examined my life.

      Yep. If you joined MENSA for "intellectual validation", you were indeed a fuckhead. They ADVERTISE that's not what they're all about. so why did you think they were?

      I am pretty sure that advertising falls into "lady doth protest too much" territory. Most people are aware that is the only reason they exist.

    53. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I joined Mensa seven or eight years ago. This was in 1995.

    54. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Would you call a motorcycle gang "snobs"?

      I'm not so sure I would call them motor cycle gangs anymore at least not in the mid-west they are more like motor cycle clubs and they do a lot of charity work.

      My brother joined mensa when he was in college at the urging of one of his professors, but didn't like it. He is smart and always has a bunch of interesting projects going in his spare time, but rarely finishes any of them.

    55. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to be fair, people who ride motorcycles are unarguably better.

      And are as big a bunch of cunts as MENSA.

    56. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially a one percenter

    57. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      They will do more than that by providing more information that a beginner needs and would probably be overly helpful in helping you acquire what is needed to get started. That was how it was when I checked out the local MG club when I was thinking about getting a project car.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    58. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by am+2k · · Score: 1

      A lot of your personality is defined by your IQ:

      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. -- Eleanor Roosevelt

    59. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a pathetic, groupthink argument. It's not that the guy doesn't know how to be polite, it's that he doesn't fucking want to.

    60. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I know a former psych tech from a CA state hospital.

      Your going to have to take his word for the existence of 'The Mongoloid Mafia' on the wards. They are among the highest functioning and are brutal. Rape is common.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    61. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy an old bike or stamps. You cannot just by a higher IQ (or study for one). You can make yourself smarter, but intelligence is built-in. You can get better at IQ tests, but that doesn't mean that you are actually more intelligent.

      dom

    62. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Well, some motorcycle guys (in the more infamous gangs) might consider you to be a pussy if you don't ride a hog or know anything about mechanics, so yes, sometimes there is snobbery there. Though I've found, personally, the vast majority of bikers to be pretty cool guys, honestly.
      But it's very definition, any kind of inclusivity implies an exclusivity - people belong to a group because of their similarities, and by the same token, people are excluded from the group for not having that something in common.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    63. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Attribution: Groucho Marx.

      Not sure who he stole it from.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    64. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Enigma2175 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even in high school, I'd read the textbooks, and then sit in class, kinda bored.
      But while most concepts needed explained several times,
      Suddenly, not the stops,

      You should have read the English book again.

      --

      Enigma

    65. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone with a high IQ, I think Mensa are a bunch of weirdo snobby nerds. And I'm a snobby nerd, just not a weirdo about it.

    66. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High IQ people are just as dumb as the rest, they are just better at rationalizing their own idiocy

    67. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      And a felony record... seriously take your white-bread suburban rice burning car up to a biker hangout and ask for help getting started.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    68. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      That's the best description of Mensa (it's not an acronym!) that I've seen in the this week's spate of publicity, which I think is coming out in connection with next week's annual conference in Boston.

      Yes, as with Fight Club, the subject you never talk about in Mensa is IQ itself. The organization is for people who have one specific thing in common, but are in other ways totally diverse.

    69. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by paazin · · Score: 1

      Which is why the post was actually a troll that flew under most peoples' radar. Well done! ;)

    70. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you haven't found the edge of your intellectual envelope you haven't tried. Not everything is easy. If you've never found something that makes your work hard mentally you are just coasting on the easy stuff.

      What you describe isn't intelligence. It's a common cultural framework enhancing communication. You've all read the same books so you can communicate the concepts in few words. Happens to all groups. Your group isn't 'smarter'; sorry. (graphic artists? WTF)

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    71. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by CrackHappy · · Score: 2

      That, my friend, is the reason I never joined Mensa. They're a bag of dicks.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    72. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by the way, a bit of history: MENSA members did sometimes wear small yellow pins, like tie tacks but about 1/8" diameter, like those little pins you stick in maps -- not badges -- simply so that they could find each other in a crowd.

      This practice ceased in 1985 due to their lunch money being stolen every day.

    73. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      I agree, One time in line at a grocery store one man remarked about how it was stupid they had "retards"[sic] working there. I told him "You can learn from anybody, even this so-called 'retard.' for example, notice he is treating everybody with respect. You know, come to think of it, I never met anyone with Down's syndrome who is a nasty and judgmental prick like you. Maybe we can all take a lesson and learn to treat others nicely."

      /r/thatHappened

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    74. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > tripple nine
      > not joining the five nines club
      This is why we can't have nice uptime.

    75. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by jythie · · Score: 2

      If you can get better at IQ tests, that says a lot about how accurate of a measurement they can provide.

    76. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dropped my membership after a year (meaning that I get constantly spammed with "Come back" mail, instead of paying for a magazine.) The magazine was what really did me in: picture a newsletter edited (actually, written) by Frasier Crane, full of letters to the editor where every other sentence uses the word "Mensans." I actually cringe when I see that word now.

      The idea is good, I've often lived in places where I couldn't have a conversation unless I matched impedance and talked about (cheap domestic) beer and sports, but a lot of Mensans really do have the common sense and social skills that everyone makes fun of them for. The best thing I can say about the organization is that they never reveal the results of their IQ test (other than pass/fail), or many would add it to their name / signature: Niles Crane 165, like a wacky college reunion nametag.

    77. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Jmc23 · · Score: 0
      If you were one of the intelligent ones you would know better!

      You can get more intelligent just like you can lose it as well.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    78. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as with Fight Club, the subject you never talk about in Mensa is IQ itself. The organization is for people who have one specific thing in common, but are in other ways totally diverse.

      Then why bother? Seriously, it sounds rather pointless. If, as you suggest, they have only this one thing in common but are otherwise "totally diverse" then this looks like nothing more than a snobbish club that would rather segregate themselves from the rest of the hoi polloi. Do these people have anything in common with one another than their IQ? ANYTHING?

    79. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at one point Phillip Morris advertised that their products were healthy. Based on your offense to the gp I am guessing you are in Mensa. What IQ do you have to be before you learn that advertising is equivalent to "stretching the truth as much as possible to make yourself look good"?

    80. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People (by and large... certainly there are exceptions) join MENSA so that they can converse with other people with similar mental character and interests.

      Of course, some of us don't need to join a club of people who passed an IQ test to find smart people to converse with. In fact, some of us can actually manage to have intelligent conversations with (at least a few) others regardless of whether they managed to pass an IQ test. You might also want to consider that such artificial means of segregating yourselves can easily lead other forms of insular patterns and habits of thought. Or is that a concept too heady for you to wrap your mind around?

    81. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      The only thing they have in common is an interest in knowing how smart they, and other people are, by one particular yardstick. As interest go, that's pretty shallow.

      That's simply not true. I met someone in an L.A. MENSA group. Within their group they have a rocketry club, and a movie-night club, and a poetry club, and many more.

      So what's wrong with that?

    82. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by mha · · Score: 1

      > So what's wrong with that?

      Nothing is wrong with that, but I am intelligent enough to see that you don't invalidate one shred of the original comment you reply to. What you write is orthogonal, meaning it's something unrelated, it neither supports nor invalidates the prior statement. :-)

    83. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I was friends with a couple of Mensa members who had been past presidents of the local chapter. They did describe it as basically a social scene. If you showed up at a Mensa party you might not realize that the people were all above average intelligence because they didn't hang out chatting about intellectual stuff but instead drank beer and talked about the same boring stuff everyone else does and meet people of the appropriate sex. And because it was based on IQ and not upon achievements, the members could come from all parts of society.

    84. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Its a job, they become self sufficient, they're happy with the job, so why not? It's a vastly better model than the old style of sticking all the mentally challenged into a special home. And if the person with down's syndrome is a better worker than the slack off stoner college kid, then that's great.

    85. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Poorly maintained still exceeds my standards.

    86. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      Then they deserve the same wage as the stoner kid.

    87. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, the Mensa group meetings from what I've heard is just an ordinary event with ordinary people talking about ordinary things, except that perhaps the variety of people is much larger since it is not self-selected based upon interests or social status (thus the redneck is rubbing shoulders with the college prof).

    88. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Nothing is wrong with that, but I am intelligent enough to see that you don't invalidate one shred of the original comment you reply to. What you write is orthogonal, meaning it's something unrelated, it neither supports nor invalidates the prior statement. :-)

      I wasn't trying to "invalidate" anything. I was just presenting a point of view.

    89. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Because you will be among people who won't object if you spend a whole convention week solving a jigsaw puzzle of all one color, or if you point out that it's "hoi polloi", not "the hoi polloi."

    90. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Maybe if we put a tax on stupid we could balance the budget

      It's working for MENSA (, presumably.)

    91. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is disturbing/frightening to see so many fools riding around nowadays that do not know how to steer a gyroscope. A physicist would understand why it is so.

      And yet, there seem to be few really world-class physicists in motorcycle racing...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    92. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried the test me and they told

      You used impeccable English like the above and they didn't let you in? What a bunch of snobs!

    93. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      After 50 years of observations and data collecting on the human species, I have come to the conclusion that everyone has autism and the only difference is that some people cover it up better than others.

    94. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rain Man will now have a way to meet Rain Woman.

    95. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non sequitur. Intelligence is not an 'interest'. If you are interested in physics, you'd join a physics group or a crossword puzzle group. The irony is that while it makes sense to join an elite fraternity/sorority for the social connections it provides, association with other Mensans doesn't generally convey social advantages and likely does just the opposite ;-)

    96. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      Let's put it another way. Since it's a club for people with similar intrinsic characteristics, how would you call a party for only white people? I'll be burned for that, right?

    97. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just read myself again and I couldn't believe how wrote I badly above.

    98. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure members of Mensa would be happy for you to increase your IQ if you wanted to join. The difference is just that that isn't possible. That's hardly the fault of the Mensa members.

    99. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just exactly how some people join motorcycle clubs because they like motorcycles and want to discuss them and appreciate them with people of similar interest, someone might join MENSA because they like talking about physics -- or even crossword puzzles -- with people who are like themselves.

      Everyone can join a motorcycle club. Not everyone can join Mensa. Their test separates the "worthy" from the "unworthy". And that's something I don't like.

    100. Re: why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by MickeydotFinn · · Score: 1

      The final section of a proper IQ test is to get invited to join MENSA...and decline.

    101. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Where I'm from, people join motorcycle clubs to deal drugs, run protection rackets and applying discipline to people, mostly those who have debts. So your analogy doesn't work for me.

    102. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by gsslay · · Score: 1

      That's simply not true.

      I wasn't trying to "invalidate" anything

      Can you spot where people might think you were?

    103. Re:why would I want to hang with a buncha cunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or men only.
      Because the "diversity over all" crowd will getcha for that.
      But black only, American Indian only, women only: those are OK, because RACISM and GENDER EQUALITY, right?

  2. IF.. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they were that smart they would know that the IQ test is neither a valid no reliable test for comparisons between groups, only within groups.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also don't forget that the tests themselves are quite poor, and that people attribute too much to a high IQ. The fact that I ace those tests makes me doubt their validity even more...

    2. Re:IF.. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not particularly good among "groups", either.

      The idea that you would join a society dedicated to separating you from "regular people" based on your supposed superior intelligence is a pretty strange notion. Most of the people who I know are Mensa members are the type that couldn't get accepted to any other club.

    3. Re:IF.. by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Really? I don't find the legitimate ones bad at all. Much better than the SAT for testing raw, innate intelligence.

      IQ is like a brightness of a flashlight. It's potential. Brighter is better, but it doesn't guarantee you point it at a useful direction, or even use it for anything useful at all other than to study playboy under the bedsheets.

      I would think if they took recent Nobel Prize winners in the hard sciences, they would be trending above average and by a margin.

    4. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They don't have enough real-world experience at the young age most of them get their certificates to actually comprehend that - just an analytical ability that at their age is ahead of the curve; mostly due to having parents that actually read to them, etc. Most don't re-test as adults for a good reason. "IQ scales for life.. you don't need to re-test," they'll drone, spouting nonsense that can be disproven with any reasonably sized statistical sample set. Went to a couple of Mensa open days when I was a kid. Decided I didn't want to be in a narcissist club. Have not once missed out getting laid due to my lack of offical genius status. :)

    5. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The idea that you would join a society dedicated to separating you from "regular people" based on your supposed superior intelligence is a pretty strange notion.

      Like going to college? Or having a career in science, math, technology, or engineering? Right, who would want to do that?

    6. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why? Some people join places based on superior strength, they're called gyms.

    7. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they were that smart they would know that the IQ test is neither a valid no reliable test for comparisons between groups, only within groups.

      Then perhaps that's why the group of geniuses want to get together and compare each other within a dating site?

      What do I know, I'm just a layman.

    8. Re:IF.. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      You ever actually been to a gym? Like 24-hour Fitness? You will not find exceptional physical specimens there.

       

    9. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The idea that you would join a society dedicated to separating you from "regular people" based on your supposed superior intelligence is a pretty strange notion.

      Strange? No, separating oneself from the "other" on some nebulous basis is as common as muck. Substituting "politics", "religion", or "race" in place of "intelligence" should make that plain enough.

    10. Re:IF.. by Beck_Neard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As the article says, that's irrelevant because it's a tribe affiliation. When it comes to these things, logic and intelligence are completely overwhelmed and suppressed. That's how our brains work. Ever notice how all so-called "freethought" and "rationalist" groups soon turn into hilariously ironic examples of conformity and groupthink?

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    11. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumb people admire high IQs

    12. Re:IF.. by Nephandus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Reality is politically incorrect, thus observation is unethical.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    13. Re:IF.. by Ghaoth · · Score: 1

      Getting a high IQ in a test demonstrates that you are good at doing IQ tests. I should know, I have an IQ of 42 and I'm still looking for the question.

      --
      Nos Morituri te salutamus
    14. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not to mention that most US public schools have tested for IQ since the 50's and sequestered the 'winners' into a group with special classes and teachers

      that, and the occasional beating at the hands of the masses for being weird and I could see the appeal

      it still seems weak, kinda like AA for brainiacs

    15. Re:IF.. by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. The Secret is mindless belief so say the average and below believers, and they're in control, so they must be right. Don't make them prove it by popularity or violence. That's not smart...

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    16. Re:IF.. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      If they were that smart they would know that the IQ test is neither a valid no reliable test for comparisons between groups, only within groups.

      This.

      Someone once said that IQ tests only measure how good you are at doing IQ tests. I would put it another way: they only measure a certain kind of intelligence -- the kind that is good at solving logical puzzles. Not necessarily the kind that excels at sports, arts, empathy, ethics, etc. As the OP says, they might be a proxy for ranking within groups, but not between them.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    17. Re:IF.. by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Well, it may not be all that universally useful.

    18. Re:IF.. by Nephandus · · Score: 0

      Since when? The majority of people geekshame basic math skills.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    19. Re:IF.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The idea that you would join a society dedicated to separating you from "regular people" based on your supposed superior intelligence is a pretty strange notion. Most of the people who I know are Mensa members are the type that couldn't get accepted to any other club.

      The Mensa groups I attended (in more than one area) were more like bridge clubs. They sat around and played games, while gossiping. They didn't interest me.

    20. Re:IF.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Certainly not while you are there.

    21. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think /. or NPR, BBC, had stories about IQ tests that use MRI type imaging to see which areas of the brain "light up" to now determine the true IQ of a person. I don't have citations for that, but I'm sure an internet search should be able to give you plenty of article on it. I know the person being tested is asked various questions and given problem solving tasks to complete, I believe but I'm probably wrong, the questions/tasks aren't something you'll find on a standard IQ test.

    22. Re:IF.. by sFurbo · · Score: 2

      I would think if they took recent Nobel Prize winners in the hard sciences, they would be trending above average and by a margin.

      IIRC, if you want to win a Nobel prize, having an IQ over 120 is paramount, but anything above that does not give you any further advantage.

    23. Re:IF.. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >It's not particularly good among "groups", either.

      It's a ranking test designed for the classroom. You fire a bunch of questions, the same ones at the subjects and rank them in order of their results. There should be many questions. That is the IQ test. That's why it's a 'Q' for quotient, not any other sort of metric. It ranks within a group in the same testing context.
      As a test it has no power to test an absolute level of intelligence. Just a relative ranking measure, and a sloppy one at that, within a group.

      The later attempts to use the test across groups and worse, across vastly different contexts, while claiming it measures intelligence, while ignoring the Q in IQ are at best dishonest but actually criminal.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    24. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Political correctness is a war on noticing"

    25. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My wife went to one or two Mensa meetings in high school back in the 70s. She decided it was a bunch of socially inept people who couldn't get dates, and the conversations weren't interesting enough to make up for being hit on by sleazy older guys.

      I do have some friends who are in their ~50s who've been involved with Mensa and like it, but no accounting for taste, though maybe it's better these days.

    26. Re:IF.. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >they might be a proxy for ranking within groups
      That's what the test was designed for.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    27. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd also know that it was intended to measure how well one fits into the formal education environment. It has little to do with intelligence, and the idea that you can measure someone's intelligence and spit out a simple number is absolutely absurd.

    28. Re:IF.. by jeIlomizer · · Score: 1

      Much better than the SAT for testing raw, innate intelligence.

      That it's much better than the garbage known as the SAT isn't saying much, because better is not the same as good. I still have trouble believing that so many people think IQ equates to intelligence, when we don't even understand intelligence all that well. Yet, we can measure someone's intelligence with a simple test and the result is a simple number. It seems people's desire for simplicity gets in the way of truth.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    29. Re:IF.. by sFurbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Intelligence (as measured by Spearman's g factor) is one of the best predictors for pretty much any measure of success or talent. People who excel at art or sports are also people with high g. The IQ test has one of the highest correlations Spearman's g of any test, so IQ test measures a lot more than how good you are at doing IQ tests.

    30. Re: IF.. by madprof · · Score: 1

      Yes, but vanity seems to overcome this. The whole simplistic notion of a single score to describe a mental ability that is as broad as "intelligence" is lacking in scientific rigour. But apparently clever people are too clever to need rigour.

    31. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're doing those things to achieve the same goals as joining Mensa, then you've got a weird idea of the role of education in society.

    32. Re:IF.. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      There is a fairly strong correlation between them and other indications of intelligence, such as skill at chess, academic success or business success.

    33. Re:IF.. by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      If they were smart, they would not need to pay for being told they are (especially given that the tests are mostly rehashes)

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    34. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the gym you go to.

      Go to a gym with a large free-weight section at 10 AM on a Sunday and you'll probably mostly see very fit people. Go to a regular chain gym at 6 PM on a Monday night and you'll see lots of moderately overweight Joe Sixpack types who are feeling guilty about all the beer and pizza they consumed over the weekend.

    35. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colleges and career aren't societies as in social clubs. They have purposes -- including what are usually considered their main purpose -- other than hanging out exclusively with other people who have misplaced beliefs in the value of IQ tests and their own intellectual superiority.

    36. Re:IF.. by ruir · · Score: 1

      And why should certain people need to meet people from "regular" people? Well, for me, and luckily over different periods of my life, I found people like me, talking about cars, the football, religion or TV/fucking idols does not cut it out.

    37. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do. it says if you read their testing methodology too. At least the Dutch chapter does.

      Been thinking about joining because I need to recruit smart people - maybe its a good source, but it is rather elitist (self selecting group - many members join in order to find a group that embraces their narcissism) and I'd rather drink beer and watch football (real football, not the combination of sumo wrestling, bull fighting, and smear the queer the USA calls football) than discuss the finer points of some impractical bullshit.

    38. Re:IF.. by Sique · · Score: 1

      Being fast at 100 m runs demonstrates you are good at doing 100 m runs. Still you will be hailed a talent in Track&Field.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    39. Re:IF.. by risom · · Score: 1

      Really? I don't find the legitimate ones bad at all. Much better than the SAT for testing raw, innate intelligence. IQ is like a brightness of a flashlight. It's potential. Brighter is better, but it doesn't guarantee you point it at a useful direction, or even use it for anything useful at all other than to study playboy under the bedsheets.

      The problem is that IQ as a variable is pretty useless in practice. It has no prognostic validity for success in life or in a job. Motivation is far more important for that, but it's also harder to measure.

      I would think if they took recent Nobel Prize winners in the hard sciences, they would be trending above average and by a margin.

      Sure, but you would find even more high-IQ persons in quite mundane jobs. IQ is a confounding variable for success. Counter example: most Nobel Prize winners are male, too. Is that the reason for their success?

    40. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much better than the SAT for testing raw, innate intelligence.

      I still have trouble believing that so many people think IQ equates to intelligence, when we don't even understand intelligence all that well.

      I believe you meant to say "You" not "we".

    41. Re:IF.. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Actually, if they were that smart, they should be able to find each other without a dating service. Or if they don't have time for that, at least build robots that go out there looking for smart people to date...

    42. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I joined just to see if I could get in, haven't actually bothered to go to a meeting.

    43. Re:IF.. by Roadmaster · · Score: 1

      Hm, if they were that smart, they'd also know that the name they chose for their society (whatever) means something like "stupid" in spanish. So not a lot of thought went into that...

    44. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intelligence (as measured by Spearman's g factor) is one of the best predictors for pretty much any measure of success or talent.

      Huh, I thought it was socio-economic status.

    45. Re:IF.. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      We all love to be part of a social clique that will make you seem better then the rest of the world.
      Mensa is one of those groups that requires a high IQ score.
      Having a high IQ doesn't mean you are a good person or a desirable member of society. Just that you are good at tests meant to measure your IQ.

      The IQ test is better at finding people who have mental retardation who may need additional assistance.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    46. Re:IF.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Last time I took a supervised IQ test was about 15 years ago, but I easily did well enough to qualify for Mensa membership, so I have no emotional investment in disparaging the IQ tests (I'd love it if my score really were an objective measure of my intelligence!), but they have a number of flaws. Consider this simple example:

      What is the next number in the sequence? 1, 2, 4, 8, 16

      Most people here would tell you that it's 32. They're powers of two. However, 31 is an equally valid number (the maximum number of pieces you can divide a circle into using just straight lines). It's not just about pattern recognition, it's about recognising specific patterns. There are lots of other subtle biases involved. The same is true of the visual and spacial puzzles.

      They're a good way of exercising your brain, but they're not really very representative of general intelligence. There's also the issue that the tests accuracy drops of quickly as you move away from the median. My test scores ranged by about 20 points over half a dozen tests. If someone tells you that they have an IQ of 143 (for example), then it's bullshit. There's so much margin of error there that it's really hard to distinguish anyone above 130 (I think Mensa requires 131), and even over 120 has a pretty hefty error margin.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    47. Re:IF.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The researchers actually observing this long-ago concluded that it has nothing to do with being black, hispanic, white or asian and almost exclusively to do with economic and social factors. It's not just politically incorrect to assert that it's a race issue, it's contrafactual.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    48. Re:IF.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      If we'd gone into a career in science to separate ourselves from 'regular people' then we wouldn't be investing so much time and energy in outreach...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    49. Re:IF.. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I still have trouble believing that so many people think IQ equates to intelligence, when we don't even understand intelligence all that well.

      Exactly. An IQ test tries to measure something we're not sure of what it is or even what we mean by it. As a result, different IQ tests measure slightly different things with different weights. Mostly, IQ tests measure your ability to do IQ tests. That IQ value does correlate strongly with all sorts of stuff, like doing well in school, university and work, but it's no guarantee.

    50. Re:IF.. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Really? I don't find the legitimate ones bad at all. Much better than the SAT for testing raw, innate intelligence.

      .

      Except MENSA accepts SAT and GMAT as qualifying exams. I would guess Mensa members fall into two broad categories, those who have self esteem issues and need to tell people they are members as if they makes them somehow special or better and all the rest. Unfortunately the former are the most visible and give all members a bad name.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    51. Re:IF.. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      However, 31 is an equally valid number (the maximum number of pieces you can divide a circle into using just straight lines).

      Doesn't that sequence go 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16?

      http://www.murderousmaths.co.u...

      Incidentally I've scored exactly 135 on every single one of several IQ tests I've taken over the years. I like to think I'm pretty smart, but I don't think I'm so smart I should be in a club. In some aspects of life I'm an absolute chump.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    52. Re:IF.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Ugh, that's what I get for posting before coffee. Yes, the sequence that I was thinking of is circle division by chords, not circle division by lines.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    53. Re:IF.. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Actually, if they were that smart, they should be able to find each other without a dating service. Or if they don't have time for that, at least build robots that go out there looking for smart people to date...

      You mean, like a dating service? Seems to me the smartest thing to do is to use the best tool for the job.

    54. Re:IF.. by abies · · Score: 2

      Hmm. So;
      - people of race X are more likely to come from poor background on average
      - people coming from poor backgrounds have less IQ on average
      is ok, but saying:
      - people of race X have less IQ on average
      is already contrafactual. So, in same way:
      - 1/3 of cars of brand X have ignition locks of type Y, as opposed to 1/10 of other car manufacturers
      - ignition locks of type Y are more prone to getting car on fire
      will be ok, but saying:
      - cars of brand X are more prone to get on fire
      will be already wrong?

      Car analogy ticked off. Let's try Nazis:
      - most SS officers in WW2 were German
      - most killings in death camps were done by SS officers
      does not imply
      - most killings in death camps during WW2 were done by Germans
      because no Germans who were not SS officers have done any killing, so correlation is purely between SS and killings?

      Ok, two analogies ticked. To reassume - you let your political correctness cloud your logic. A->B->C implies A->C. Fact that A doesn't cause C _directly_ doesn't mean it does not imply it. You can split any problem into substeps. I throw rock at window, it flies in the air, it breaks the window, it is air/rock fault window got broken, not mine...

    55. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And other researchers controlled for parental income and socio-economic status, and figured out that it accounts for exactly zero of the difference between races. While family income is very significant on its own, the race gap exists at high parental income levels, at medium income levels and at low income levels.

      The original 1995 data set.

      Redone on the 2008 data set.

    56. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IQ tests are widely recognized as measuring just what the IQ tests, and not overall intelligence. I wouldn't be surprised if you could jump from 90 to 125 just out of repetition, familiarity and training with enough motivation and a relaxed state of mind. Stressed or anxious? You'll fuck up in the test. Does that mean you suddenly became a moron? I wouldn't say so.

      (Passed the Mensa test)

    57. Re:IF.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know what a spurious correlation is. I'm not sure you think think that highlighting one when the actual underlying causal mechanism is plain to see is an intellectually fruitful strategy. You're not one of those "my kid was diagnosed with autism after his vaccines, therefore the vaccines caused the autism" kooks, are you?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    58. Re:IF.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna need something a bit more trustworthy than two random jpeg images of charts off wordpress.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    59. Re:IF.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Been a while since I did any but the spread was no more than 5.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    60. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why the real tests try as hard as possible to avoid cultural knowledge. There are no letters or numbers or square root signs in any of the standardised IQ tests I have made.

      If you succeed (which I agree is hard) then the "group" should be "all adult humans".

      On the other hand the kind of "IQ tests" that you see online that includes proper math and langauge interpretation those can obviously only be used within a group.

    61. Re:IF.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The researchers actually observing this long-ago concluded that it has nothing to do with being black, hispanic, white or asian and almost exclusively to do with economic and social factors.

      Other researchers, who know how to control for those factors, say otherwise.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    62. Re:IF.. by abies · · Score: 2

      No, because vaccines have no relation to autism.
      IF there would be a:
      - vaccines contain X amount of lead
      - X amount of lead causes autism
      AND there would be a correlation between vaccines and autism, I would happily say 'vaccines cause autism', instead of saying 'it is just lead which causes autism, fact that vaccines contain lead is irrelevant, because injecting pure lead would also cause autism'

      People from certain racial minorities have lower IQ. It is caused by social inequality, not genetics ('lead', not 'weak patogens' in false vaccine example), but let's not get PR into our statements.

      Of course, EVEN if there would be genetic relation by few percent, it would not give anybody right to dismiss specific person just based on that. We are talking about averages and very small differences. But if we are allowing people to discriminate by saying 'your are from poor family, so you are probably stupid', we should allow as well discriminating by 'your skin is blue, blues are generally poor, so you are probably stupid'. If we are not allowing to discriminate based on 'probably stupid' because every human is different etc, then it doesn't matter if it is race related or socioeconomic related guess.

    63. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tests accuracy drops of quickly as you move away from the median. My test scores ranged by about 20 points over half a dozen tests.

      When I was a teenager I took five different supervised IQ tests to help students who had to practice administering them. The difference between my highest and lowest scores were 40 points and I very seriously doubt I was at the high end of that range. Since then I don't have much faith in IQ tests.

    64. Re:IF.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I follow your objection. Perhaps I should give a clearer example: there are well-established links between being a computer user and being unhealthy. However as the joke in the Simpsons goes, it's not the computer use that the issue, it's the non-stop sitting and snacking that comes with it. The ostensible connection is meaningless, it just happens to put those individuals in a group where they would run into the real causal agent.

      I'm not being pedantic here: focussing on the underlying causal issue determines how you react to a result, whether it's mandating restricted computer use versus encouraging exercise, or accepting under-representation of minorities in technical fields as an intrinsic part of their existence versus addressing the social deprivation that causes that in the first place.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    65. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just about pattern recognition, it's about recognising specific patterns. There are lots of other subtle biases involved. The same is true of the visual and spacial puzzles.

      It is because of this reason that I do not take the IQ test seriously. If you are an intelligent person you may notice several patterns, but the test only accepts as valid the specific pattern that the authors want. The test is too biased to be usefull.

    66. Re:IF.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      They know how to control for controlling for economic and social factors? What?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    67. Re:IF.. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase. I get what you're saying, that it's a factually correct statement to say that people from such-and-such a group get such-and-such results on a test. The point I want to contest - the AC now at "1, Informative" that Nephandus is supporting - is the idea that it's due to some underlying difference between the races that we're just too politically correct to acknowledge. The observation is true, the conclusion they're pushing is counterfactual.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    68. Re:IF.. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      There's also the issue that the tests accuracy drops of quickly as you move away from the median.

      That and all the usual test-taking issues apply. I was tested as a child and got a well under 130 result the first time as a result of distraction. I was re-tested and scored significantly higher than that the second time, which was fortunate since a score around there was a threshold for being in the state's special education program at the time.

    69. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't doubt that there are people who can come out of the Brazilian jungle, be the first of their tribes to meet civilization and then on the very day score 180 on an IQ test. Mainly because I have no proof that such innate pattern recognition is impossible.
      However, I know that my education in mathematics and logic allows me to spot a far larger number of patterns in IQ tests than I would if I didn't have the knowledge. Is my score limited by something besides the level I reached in those fields?
      How many Mensors are illiterate?

    70. Re:IF.. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      You mean, like a dating service? Seems to me the smartest thing to do is to use the best tool for the job.

      Well, it basically means you've met all of the people in your local Mensa meetings, found them to be insufferable asses or complete dorks.

      Now, you're going to broaden your search for people not in your local chapter, and find them to be insufferable asses or complete dorks.

      Because, the handful of people I've met who admit to being members of Mensa have 'defective' written all over them. The smugness factor often puts them at risk of getting a well deserved smack.

      Obligatory Simpsons reference:

      Lisa: My family never talks about library standards. And every time I try to steer the conversation that way, they make me feel like a nerd.
      Comic Book Guy: We are hardly nerds. Would a nerd wear such an irreverent sweatshirt?
      [open his jacket to show off his shirt]
      Lisa: [reading the shirt] "C:/DOS C:/DOS/RUN RUN/DOS/RUN".
      [laughs]
      Lisa: Oh, only one person in a million would find that funny.
      Professor Frink: Yes, we call that the "Dennis Miller Ratio."

      :-P

      Applying for Mensa seems to disqualify you from normal human interaction for the rest of your life.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    71. Re:IF.. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member."

      Groucho Marx

    72. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you have evidence for that claim, don't you? If IQ testing was not valid, it wouldn't have so much correlation for income and success. If it wasn't reliable, then it would not be a statistically significant predictor either.

      More unsubstantiated drivel from Slashtards who are so under confident about their own intelligence that they resort to this level of discussion.

    73. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that maybe, just maybe, that people with higher IQs are capable of better climbing the socioeconomic ladder?

    74. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZING!

    75. Re: IF.. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The whole simplistic notion of a single score to describe a mental ability that is as broad as "intelligence" is lacking in scientific rigour.

      I am always reminded of the very brilliant Far Side cartoon when this topic comes up ... Midvale School for the Gifted, and the kid is pushing on the door labelled pull.

      Because, really, very smart people can do very stupid things just like everybody else. Sure, you might be really clever at some things, but you may well be a complete moron at others.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    76. Re:IF.. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      "Occidental Ascent?" Really?

    77. Re:IF.. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Racists are rarely known to make much sense.

    78. Re:IF.. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      You mean, like a dating service? Seems to me the smartest thing to do is to use the best tool for the job.

      Heh, no. That would just prove they're incapable of reaching their life goals without it being all done for them. Not very smart, if you ask me. Helpless, sure.

    79. Re:IF.. by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      FTR, science isn't limited to your knee-jerk "ant-racist" dogma, so you might want to stop making really stupid assumptions and pretend their magically scientific. Most researchers admittedly avoid the topic, precisely due to it being political suicide. Plenty even claim such research is unethical, which amounts to demanding not only ignorance but allowing dogma to pretend to be the facts of the matter. Kinda hard to do real science with you lot interjecting your articles of faith and political threats.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    80. Re:IF.. by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      There's a greater correlation with certain professions involving ranges into ~140. http://www.iqcomparisonsite.co... As for dating, having an IQ over 110 negatively correlates with attraction to women regardless of her IQ, which has lovely implications. Below 110, the guy only being 10 points higher or less than the girls helps.
      Entertainment_value_to_women!=intelligence despite the propaganda/shaming tactic.
      Of course, the fecundity of the IQ=<100 range is just fun to think about. *twitch*
      Idiots preferentially breeding's a strangely sacrosanct topic, which couldn't possibly be linked to majoritarianism or sheeplefarming...

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    81. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the attempts to decrease dependency on cultural knowledge just reveal the cultural biases of the test-writers.

      Patterns which are important to me are not the same as patterns which are important to you. My field is mathematics, and the further I have gone, the longer it takes me to complete those culturally agnostic tests, because I can look for and can see more and different and more complex patterns each time. When I was 14 I just picked out the same obvious one that everyone else saw.

      Someone with a completely different, isolated upbringing from anyone in Western civilisation - someone who isn't seeing the same stupid mental quizzes every day from junior school - is likely to have a whole different set of patterns stored in their heads relevant to the kinds of problems they're faced with.

    82. Re:IF.. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They are, but a stupid person born to rich people will do better than a clever person born in squalor.

    83. Re:IF.. by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      For much of the 20th century, it was thought chess made a good proxy for intelligence. Skill at chess correlated with high intelligence. Though it was clear that lack of chess skill didn't mean a person was stupid. This correlation was believed so strongly that the AI community bought into it and tried for decades to make a computer beat highly skilled human chess players. When this effort finally succeeded, it only further confirmed what many had suspected for some time, which is that skill at chess can be obatined through sheer brute force calculation. It doesn't require intelligence, whatever that is exactly, though that helps. We need better measures and definitions. And, yes, most IQ tests aren't it.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    84. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Slashdot, +5 Informative is pretty close to racist.

    85. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      Note that there is an eight point difference between East Germany and West Germany, a seven and a half point difference between China and Chinese Singaporeans, and a four point difference between China and Taiwan.

    86. Re:IF.. by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      I think part of the problem is that what we think of as "intelligence" is a vector quantity and can't be well described by a scalar like IQ. You can define some metric on the vector intelligence, but that metric will be arbitrary. You can think of "intelligence" as a combination of memory, quick-thinking, spatial visualization, abstract mathematical ability, social abilities, etc etc. What combination of those are important will be different depending on what activity you are doing.

      The particular problem here is that most people want intelligent companions in order to have interesting conversations. I don't think the standard IQ measurement is a good indicator of how interesting someone is to talk to.

      I think most people just naturally find others with compatible ways of thinking. So using IQ to find companions who are also looking for high IQs may be pre-selecting for people who are not very good at socializing. Its not that high IQ makes you bad at socializing, but rather that if you are good at socializing, you won't need to use IQ to pre-select.

    87. Re:IF.. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      Certainly not while you are there.

      Damn, , Bazinga..! Remind me not to get into an argument with you.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    88. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone with a high IQ will tell you IQ tests are highly game-able and show nothing beyond broad bands of intelligence. Also, people who aren't white do statistically worse on them - not because white people are smarter, but because of cultural conditioning about intelligence. Same thing happens with women in certain circumstances. They're almost entirely worthless beyond being able to say "Oh, this one's reasonably bright" or "Hey, at least you've got those cheekbones to get you through."

    89. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm betting I know more about nearly everything in the world than Lebron James. He's ambitious and successful but he probably didn't read Tolstoy at age 12. Defining intelligence is a fool's game anyway, because I can't dunk for shit.

    90. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly not in a Decathlon!

    91. Re:IF.. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      The fact that a computer can beat a human at chess does not mean that chess ability isn't correlated with intelligence. A computer can also easily multiply several 10 digit numbers together and "remember" a list of one million items, if a human performs those feats there is a good chance they have a high intelligence. Nobody says Usain Bolt is a slow runner because my 1975 Pinto can go faster than him.

      --

      Enigma

    92. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means "Table" in Latin, the idea being people gathering around a table for intelligent discussion.

    93. Re:IF.. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      What has changed the most since then is a radical move toward balance of the gender ratio.

    94. Re:IF.. by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Was the irony of that reply intentional?

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    95. Re:IF.. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      It's correct by definition. That's what the test was designed to do.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    96. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I joined Mensa to find gaming opponents who could be a challenge. That and to talk about stuff that was actually interesting, as opposed to sports and other useless drivel most people waste time on. Basically Mensa is the opposite of Hollywood tabloids where people compete to be the biggest idiot and other people buy the tabloids to glorify stupid behavior. ;-)

      Having a high IQ is like being an adult in a world where 95% of the people are teenagers (likely including your boss...) not that there is anything wrong with teenagers, its just that having adult level conversations is nice.

    97. Re:IF.. by freakmn · · Score: 1

      I would guess Mensa members fall into two broad categories, those who have self esteem issues and need to tell people they are members as if they makes them somehow special or better and all the rest. Unfortunately the former are the most visible and give all members a bad name.

      I'm trying to figure out which category to try to be in, but I can't find the second one.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    98. Re:IF.. by ideonexus · · Score: 1

      If they were that smart they would know that the IQ test is neither a valid no reliable test for comparisons between groups, only within groups.

      In all fairness, Mensa accepts scores on a variety of tests to become a member, including SAT, ACT, and Military tests. Mensa has even created their own test to eliminate the verbal-bias inherent in so many other IQ tests.

      That being said, I joined Mensa because I liked being part of the same club as Isaac Asimov and Buckminster Fuller, but, like my heroes, I also found that just because somebody has a high-IQ, doesn't mean they aren't an idiot. I am shocked in many Mensa publications to find many members believe in alien abductions, are anti-vaccers, and are suckers for many other pseudoscience scams and conspiracy theories. Like Asimov and other Mensa-members, I find I get much more intellectual stimulation from my membership in the American Humanist Association of free-thinkers and rationalists.

      --
      i ~ Celebrating Science, Cyberspace, Speculation
    99. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I represent the most brilliant 0.25% of humanity, Shit! humanity is in trouble!!!

    100. Re:IF.. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I was in my states "gifted" education classes in elementary school, around grade 5. I can still remember sitting in there at one the special projects, dissecting a small shark, and looking over at the three idiots at the next table. They had cut off the head of their shark, and were making it eat it's own organs and laughing hysterically. I remember feeling certifiably that I was NOT in the gifted class.

    101. Re:IF.. by jeIlomizer · · Score: 1

      Nope. I meant "we." Everyone else is deluding themselves.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    102. Re:IF.. by jeIlomizer · · Score: 1

      A computer can also easily multiply several 10 digit numbers together and "remember" a list of one million items, if a human performs those feats there is a good chance they have a high intelligence.

      Or maybe they just have a perfect memory and are excellent at performing such calculations. Yes, there is a different between that and intelligence. Actually innovating (for example, solving a millennium prize problem) is different from just having a good memory and multiplying large numbers.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    103. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so IQ test measures a lot more than how good you are at doing IQ tests.

      What intelligence is exactly, however, is not so well-defined. Therefore, anyone claiming IQ tests measure intelligence is an idiot.

      Income != intelligence. IQ is bad science, at least with the way most people treat it.

    104. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like the ACLU would be have spent today decrying a victory over free speech exclusion zones or something.

      Oh... wait...

    105. Re:IF.. by clam666 · · Score: 1

      They know how to control for controlling for economic and social factors? What?

      You make sure the test is in both metric and imperial units, to make sure dark poor people will answer the questions since they deal with kilos and grams often because...um....never mind.

      ...sup.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    106. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find I get much more intellectual stimulation from my membership in the American Humanist Association of free-thinkers and rationalists.

      In my experience, people who style themselves "free-thinkers" or "rationalists" almost always are neither. Just sayin'.

    107. Re:IF.. by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      If I may tamper with your analogy for a moment: You can have a very bright bulb, but without a reflector you can't focus the light. You can be smart, but without focus all of that intelligence is not a lot of use.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    108. Re:IF.. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Depends. The standard gyms have a lot of people who look kinda like me, and the occasional fit-looking person. On the other hand, there was once a gym across from a bus stop I used, and everybody in there looked like a body builder.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    109. Re:IF.. by easyTree · · Score: 1

      People aren't smart enough to make difficult IQ tests.

      Don't flame me :P

    110. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it's the female tense for dumb/fool...
      2nd most spoken language in the world (after Mandarin) and you'd think these guys would be smart enough to do a little word checking before they choose a name.
      Duh...

    111. Re:IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mensa is not a Spanish word, thanks for playing. Mensa does mean canteen in Italian though.

    112. Re:IF.. by jeIlomizer · · Score: 1

      If IQ testing was not valid, it wouldn't have so much correlation for income and success.

      'Success' is subjective. Income != intelligence. In fact, we don't even truly understand intelligence, and yet we can have someone take a poorly-designed test with all sorts of inherent biases and assumptions, and then crank out a simple number that's supposed to quantify their intelligence? Bad science at its best.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  3. Let's be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone with an IQ of 60 IS about as bright as a carrot. It is well below the level of mental retardation

    1. Re:Let's be fair by Great+Big+Bird · · Score: 5, Funny

      You insulted my carrot sir!

    2. Re:Let's be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone with an IQ of 60 IS about as bright as a carrot. It is well below the level of mental retardation

      Yes, I wasn't quite understanding that "insult" either. It's far more fact than fiction when IQ is discovered at that level, as other factors would come into play that would offer validity to the carrot argument.

    3. Re:Let's be fair by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

      ... you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Let's be fair by devnulljapan · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I think the carrot infinitely more fascinating than the geranium. The carrot has mystery. Flowers are essentially tarts. Prostitutes for the bees. There is, you'll agree, a certain 'je ne sais quoi' oh so very special about a firm, young carrot."

    5. Re:Let's be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. and the winner is . . . Equatorial Guinea with an average IQ of 59.

      ref: http://www.longcountdown.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/iq.gif

    6. Re:Let's be fair by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Has that been corrected for cultural differences?

    7. Re:Let's be fair by TeethWhitener · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I am not an expert in mental/intellectual disorders.

      From Wikipedia (and cited to boot!):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ#Real-life_accomplishments

      The last table in that section states that adults with an IQ of 60 "...can harvest vegetables, repair furniture."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_disability

      In early childhood, mild intellectual disability (IQ 50–69) may not be obvious, and may not be identified until children begin school.[7] Even when poor academic performance is recognized, it may take expert assessment to distinguish mild intellectual disability from learning disability or emotional/behavioral disorders. People with mild intellectual disability are capable of learning reading and mathematics skills to approximately the level of a typical child aged nine to twelve.[7] They can learn self-care and practical skills, such as cooking or using the local mass transit system.[7] As individuals with intellectual disability reach adulthood, many learn to live independently and maintain gainful employment.

      So not quite a carrot.

    8. Re:Let's be fair by agent59517795 · · Score: 1

      "I think the carrot infinitely more fascinating than the geranium. The carrot has mystery. Flowers are essentially tarts. Prostitutes for the bees. There is, you'll agree, a certain 'je ne sais quoi' oh so very special about a firm, young carrot."

      w/nail&I

    9. Re:Let's be fair by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you believe the dogma, just add 41 to restore the average to 100.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Let's be fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Danny: The joint I'm about to roll requires a craftsman. It can utilise up to twelve skins. It is called a Camberwell carrot.
      Marwood: It's impossible to use 12 papers on one joint.
      Danny: It is impossible to roll a Camberwell carrot with anything less.
      Withnail: Who says it's a Camberwell carrot?
      Danny: I do. I invented it in Camberwell and it looks like a carrot.

  4. I hope it has LGBT support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mostly the G, because at that edge of the bell curve men are way more represented.

  5. Why bother? by ChrisKnight · · Score: 1

    I thought this is why we have so many Regional Gatherings? I'll wager a higher success rate for three days at HalloweeM vs a year long match.com account any day.

    --
    -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    1. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is probably the type of people that you'll meet. The last regional gathering I went to was on the first Tuesday of Nov 2008. I think over 90% of them were Republicans. They were very upset with Obama's election. Given that so many of them are Republicans, I never went to another meeting. I do not want to associate with so many Republicans.

    2. Re:Why bother? by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah really. Everyone I know at the groups is married or capable of going to an RG or SIG if they MUST pair up with an accredited Mensan. I'm not sure where match.com improves anything.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    3. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, only idiots would have voted for Obama.

    4. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How open minded and tolerant of you...

  6. Give those people a badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Loser."

  7. 98th percentile worldwide ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... That means NO Americans are eligible :-)

    1. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Untrue. It's actually likely that you'll have on average as many qualifying people in the US as anywhere else.

      The main difference is that in the US idiots tend to be loudmouths. Everywhere else they usually get what they deserve. Depending on area that's anything between a bullet, a fist or a gesture towards the door. I've spent some time in the US and it's amazing just how much some places cater to loudmouths. What would usually get you booted out the door around here often allows you to have your way in the US.

      That's why you get to perceive these idiots as numerous. They're not more numerous than anywhere else. They just get the wrong message. Instead of learning that being a loud dumb fuck gets your life ended prematurely and hence, depending on just HOW stupid they are, they either learn that it's better to not be a loud dumb fuck or, if they're even too dumb for that, they are being silenced, they learn that being a loud dumb fuck gets them what they want.

      And as long as you send them the wrong message, they'll continue being a nuisance.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Not only do they tend to be loudmouths, there are certain segments of the population in the United States that seem to laud ignorance..... I've lived on 3 different continents and enjoy hanging around in dive bars, you get to meet fascinating people, and one thing that I've discovered is that while there are idiots everywhere, (anecdote alert) only in the US do people BRAG about being ignorant.....

    3. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by ruir · · Score: 1

      Only in the US? Canadians seems to also not get the message. I once changed to an English school next door to their department on another town just because of a darn loud-mouthed canadian lady. She was lousy as a person, and as a teacher.

    4. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so true. I've lived in Europe, Asia, South America, and the US, with visits to multiple other areas, and the US has the worst ignorance of any place I've ever lived -- and they seem proud of it. I've literally met Americas with degrees who think Africa is a country. I've met Americans who don't know te name of the sitting Vice President, who cannot name 10 state capitals, you name it. And they are proudly ignorant. Europeans are generally far and away more informed than Americans, even people who don't have degrees. Sad, isn't it.

    5. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Give it time. The US had far more years of celebration of the ignorant on daytime TV talk shows. We're still catching up to the cult of the moron.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re: 98th percentile worldwide ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's understandable: Europeans are Nazi Ãoebermensch. The Euro Nazi Herrenvolk is by birthright master of all the world. We should all bow to the European Nazi Elite.

    7. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "loudmouths deserve to be shot"

      -Opportunist

    8. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      >> Everywhere else they usually get what they deserve.

      So, for speaking one's mind, someone should "get what they deserve."

      I don't know where you come from, but FUCK that place.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    9. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Speaking your mind is one thing. Being an obnoxious douche that has nothing to do but getting on everyone's nerves is another one.

      I come from a place where "speaking your mind" was never enshrined in some kind of constitution. We never really deemed it necessary. In the words of your forefathers, we considered it self evident that people would state it if they don't liked something. But, and that part is equally important, your right to swing your (verbal) fist ends right at where my nose is. Unless of course you are prepared to deal with the rebuttal.

      You may also notice that the constitution applies to your government. Not your peers. The government must not keep you from saying what you want on its ground. I may well take your ass and throw it on the sidewalk if I don't like what you say on mine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:98th percentile worldwide ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Idiot loudmouths, please. Don't omit that first and very important part.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. I hope it has LGBT support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a 'Mensa loves the G' joke in here somewhere...

  9. Mensa is like the Olympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The best in the world are allegedly in attendance, but in reality they suffer from the worst kind of self-selection bias imaginable.

    1. Re:Mensa is like the Olympics by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      It's also the bottom rung of IQ-snobbery organizations. Best known because least exclusive.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  10. Me, me, me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohh me, me, me,... me, me,....me, me, now I'm all hot for myself.

    1. Re:Me, me, me by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Mensans can masturbate with their minds.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Me, me, me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      So can horses.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  11. So they are selecting for Autism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You throw enough Aspie types together you might get more Aspies or you might get more Autism?

    You'll probably get some more geniuses but less than you think (nature vs. nurture).

    You'll definitely get more arseholes.

    1. Re:So they are selecting for Autism? by GoCrazy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they have no been able to study this yet because, and someone inform Al-Qaeda, this is where the 72 virgins are.

      --
      No beer and no TV make Homer something something
    2. Re:So they are selecting for Autism? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      It's actually measurably true that if both parents work in the tech sector, a child is much more likely to be autistic.

  12. Match doesn't understand "smart" by CycleMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Match.com's press release includes a hilarious "heat map listing where the smartest singles live," by mapping where Ivy League grads live. Apparently graduates of Stanford, U Chicago, CalTech, UC Berkeley, Northwestern, etc. aren't as smart. More likely, they're just not as rich and historically connected to Daddy's alma mater. http://blog.match.com/wp-conte...

    1. Re:Match doesn't understand "smart" by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

      The primary distinguisher of the Ivy League schools isn't that they're rich or that they're exceptionally high quality (though generally they are.) They're a group of colleges that a century or so ago made an agreement with each other not to have athletic scholarships, so the students could play amateur sports against each other instead of having to compete with semi-professionals. Yes, occasionally a student at the Ivies is good enough to get into the NFL or NHL, but they've got to spend time being a student as well.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    2. Re:Match doesn't understand "smart" by cyn1c77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The primary distinguisher of the Ivy League schools isn't that they're rich or that they're exceptionally high quality (though generally they are.) They're a group of colleges that a century or so ago made an agreement with each other not to have athletic scholarships, so the students could play amateur sports against each other instead of having to compete with semi-professionals. Yes, occasionally a student at the Ivies is good enough to get into the NFL or NHL, but they've got to spend time being a student as well.

      Having gone to an Ivy League school, I can tell you that they still give athletic scholarships to skilled student athletes (with skilled modifying latter noun!). They just call them "academic" scholarships.

      Wink, wink.

      Sports are big money, even for the Ivy Leagues.

    3. Re:Match doesn't understand "smart" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will be a way to find really ugly chicks.

    4. Re:Match doesn't understand "smart" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Modern colleges are just combination degree mill / PC indoctrination camp.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHh1WV-81gE

  13. Need a high IQ match service with NO mensa members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd be far better, smart people without elitist attitudes.

  14. Eugenics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? You mean no one learned from history? Still trying to create the "perfect race". For fug's sake already. You know what, really, let's see how long these relationships last. Let's turn this into a reality show and watch how perfect the children come out.

    1. Re:Eugenics? by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Historical eugenics was based on idiot politicians making pseudo-scientific claims. IQ has demonstrated a majority genetic basis. Hand-waving the evidence based on PC majoritarian dogma is precisely the hypocritically pretentious stupidity behind historical eugenics. Genes work. Breeding works. It's rarely done properly due to politics, whether state or petty/social. We got enough idiots shitting litters they can't pay for nor think should have to. What's your problem with private individuals having dating preference involving intelligence instead of standardized cultural bullshit that's too shallow to even qualify as proper sophistry?

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    2. Re:Eugenics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IQ has demonstrated a majority genetic basis.

      Just remember that IQ test results reveal that today's black's that you so much despise are smarter than whites of your great-grandfather's generation.

    3. Re:Eugenics? by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Ah, pretentiously dogmatic sense of open-mindedness. You sure got me with your PC echo. Just ignore the Asians and Caucasians consistently retained relatively higher scores, or the Flynn effect specifically reversing in Caucasians countries with immigrants of certain ethnic groups. Genetics isn't open to your values. It's ultimately physics and doesn't fucking care how you feel about it. Some larger, some are stronger, some are smarter, and nature defines all potential. Nurture just softly plays within nature's hard limits.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    4. Re:Eugenics? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      You want to watch out slinging facts around. Those PC types are dangerous.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:Eugenics? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Historical eugenics was based on idiot politicians making pseudo-scientific claims.

      Eugenics, historical or modern, are simply another incarnation of the myth of redemptive violence. Politicians proposed them and people accepted them because the idea that evil is located outside yourself and can and must be suppressed violently is so ingrained in our culture it resonates with the public, no matter how stupid or outright insane a particular proposition actually is.

      Just think of eugenics as three-strike laws or War on Whatever of old: it's there to let people enjoy their sadism with a clear conscience. Someone is being fought against; some version of Tiamat is being killed; someone is being cast to Hell; someone has been declared bringer of chaos (through their children, in the case of eugenics) and ritually desecrated (sterilized), so all is well with the world. Until the myth requires another victim, anyway.

      IQ has demonstrated a majority genetic basis. Hand-waving the evidence based on PC majoritarian dogma is precisely the hypocritically pretentious stupidity behind historical eugenics. Genes work. Breeding works. It's rarely done properly due to politics, whether state or petty/social.

      Genetics undoubtedly plays a major part in innate intelligence, since they're what separates humans from blades of grass. That doesn't mean the rest of your statements follow. They assume that your phenotype is a simple function of your genotype, when in reality it's the function of your genotype and personal history and anything but simple. Ask any animal breeder how "easy" it is to introduce even a simple quality into the population without causing problems, even in completely controlled environment.

      We got enough idiots shitting litters they can't pay for nor think should have to.

      Ah, a Republican. Yeah, I get it's annoying to pay child support. But it's still cheaper than paying for your wars.

      What's your problem with private individuals having dating preference involving intelligence instead of standardized cultural bullshit that's too shallow to even qualify as proper sophistry?

      An anonymous coward invoking Godwin's law for a dating site? Gee, I wonder what they could possibly be trying to accomplish.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Eugenics? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We got enough idiots shitting litters they can't pay for nor think should have to.

      Ah, a Republican. Yeah, I get it's annoying to pay child support. But it's still cheaper than paying for your wars.

      Sadly, this should be a false dichotomy, but as long as we keep voting the one-party system, it ain't.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Eugenics? by Calavar · · Score: 1

      Classic racist argument. Present half-facts out of context and then attack the other person as "PC." Well here are the full-facts to your half-facts:

      If anything, the Flynn effect proves that IQ is mostly determined by factors other than genetics. In the post-war Netherlands, the average IQ went up 21 points in 30 years. Unless they had a top secret Eugeneics program that no-one has managed to discover, there is no way the Dutch gene pool could have changed so dramatically in such a short period. Or, for even better evidence, you can look at the case of post Brown v. Board of Education Virginia:

      During the 1960s, when some Virginia counties closed their public schools to avoid racial integration, compensatory private schooling was available only for Caucasian children. On average, the scores of African-American children who did not receive formal education during that period decreased at a rate of about six IQ points per year.

      These are the same children that were being tested year after year. There is simply no way genetics could have played a role.

      It's long been established that IQ tests are a terrible measure of innate intelligence. Actually, it's been established literally from the very beginning: Alfred Binet, who created the first IQ test, wanted to identify children in a particular public school who had learning disabilities. He designed the IQ test to determine which children were learning more slowly, and he explicitly said that the test did not measure innate intelligence:

      The scale, properly speaking, does not permit the measure of the intelligence, because intellectual qualities are not superposable, and therefore cannot be measured as linear surfaces are measured.

      The important thing is that all of the students Binet studied went to the same school. That isn't true in studies that are comparing intelligence amongst difference races. Guess what? If you take a test that is measuring how much you got out of school and you attended a crappy school, then you obviously aren't going to do well on said test as kids who went to good schools, and in the US, whites and Asians attend (on average) much better schools than African Americans and Latinos.

    8. Re:Eugenics? by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Actually since the Flynn effect didn't alter ethnic differences, it verified that nurture failed to trump nature, which is flagrantly counter to your claim.
      Also, you Binet sermon's just genetic fallacy added to weasel words. Who "established that IQ tests are terrible measure of innate intelligence" and how exactly?
      IQ testing has certainly been updated since the long defunct original Standford-Binet test intended for predicting academic potential, and is far more robust than your reduction. Wechsler tests among others are different batteries for different indications, and the stats hold over large populations with a great many correlations over decades of study, regardless of your dislike.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    9. Re:Eugenics? by Calavar · · Score: 1

      Actually since the Flynn effect didn't alter ethnic differences, it verified that nurture failed to trump nature, which is flagrantly counter to your claim.

      Let me get this straight: IQ scores of populations rise without changes to the ethnic composition of said populations, and this somehow proves that race is the main determiner of IQ? Sorry, buddy, but the Netherlands did not "whiten" between 1952 and 1982. Quite the opposite: immigrants began to flood in from Indonesia, Aruba and the Antilles, and Suriname. And yet IQ went up drastically. And if you look at 1960s Virginia, an unchanged population of a single race saw a dramatic changed by thirty points in just five years. 30 points is supposedly the difference between average (100) and mentally retarded (70). Do you want me to believe that as soon as the Virginia public schools shut down, radioactive spiders bit all the black students (and only the black students) to alter their DNA and turn them into retards over the span of five years? Or is it more likely that five years without schooling left their academic abilities rusty and atrophied?

      Who "established that IQ tests are terrible measure of innate intelligence" and how exactly?

      Binet (but you call that genetic fallacy, fine). But also Flynn and several professors of psychology. How? With scientific studies, but you'll probably just write them off as "PC."

      IQ testing has certainly been updated since the long defunct original Standford-Binet test intended for predicting academic potential, and is far more robust than your reduction. Wechsler tests among others are different batteries for different indications, and the stats hold over large populations with a great many correlations over decades of study, regardless of your dislike.

      Nice try, but the modern day IQ tests are exactly the ones that were debunked in those two articles I linked to. The Cell article I linked to specifically mentions Wechsler. They conclude that most general IQ tests are useless, but concede specific tests, such as the subtest component of Wechsler may still have some value (since they did not analyze the efficacy of subtests in this paper). But another paper that did analyze subtest scores concludes that they, too are entirely useless. Just Say No to Subtest Analysis: A Critique on Wechsler Theory and Practice.

      You sound a lot like J. Philippe Rushton, who for years claimed that Africans were intellectually inferior to other races on a biological level. It almost sounded believable until he started claiming that there was an inverse relation between penis size and intelligence. My best guess is that you, like Rushton, are only engaged in this racial superiority pissing contest to because you want to lessen your insecurities about the size of certain appendages for which you are markedly below average.

    10. Re:Eugenics? by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Well, there's no dialogue with you between your strawmen and handwaving. Your prompt immediate upvoters are a nice touch too...

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    11. Re:Eugenics? by Calavar · · Score: 1

      J. Philippe Rushton jokes aside, if by "strawmaning and handwaving" you mean thoroughly rebutting your arguments, then yes, I've done plenty of "strawmaning and handwaving," and unless you can tell my why the patterns observed in the Netherlands and Virginia are inconclusive or why the papers I linked to are inaccurate, I think that brings this debate to a close.

    12. Re:Eugenics? by careysub · · Score: 1

      Calavar crushed your case like a bug. Nice to see you are as graceless a loser as your close-minded, and logic-challenged.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    13. Re:Eugenics? by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      I didn't make the case he was referring to nor did he provide crushing evidence of anything when the majority of evidence contradicts his claims. He's fucking incoherent. The modern Standford-Binet doesn't even work like he claims and along with the WAIS is very well regarded. They're used to identify mental disability for legal purposes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm...

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
  15. Won't anybody think of the children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor sods.

  16. Don't have to make an ass of yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really smart people know enough about interpersonal relations to see that being an ass to people just because you're smarter than they are is not very smart. Really smart people help everyone to maximize their potential. On the other hand, I suppose high IQ is no defense against high narcissism. It's a shame that the narcissists are the most likely to go out there and claim to speak for all of us.

    And really, the 98th percentile? We're talking about people who probably got a question wrong on the SAT and have fewer than 6 degrees. Hardly genius material. The real geniuses are closer to one in a million (literally).

    1. Re:Don't have to make an ass of yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. Although I would be interested in the future divorce rates among people that screen mates over test taking abilities.

    2. Re:Don't have to make an ass of yourself by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      As opposed to "shit tests" and "game"?

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
  17. Zombie bait by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    At some point anyone with a half functioning brain quickly realizes they are total idiots who know nothing.

    Those with fully functional brains should avoid bathrooms, strip clubs and always check the back seats before driving off.

  18. Inflation of the word 'genius' by itzly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The word 'genius' should be reserved for a rare occasion where a person shows extraordinary insight and brilliance, not the smartest person of a random group of 50.

    1. Re:Inflation of the word 'genius' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Genius isn't actually used in any modern definition. Exceptional, Superior etc.etc. is used for the top 2%

    2. Re:Inflation of the word 'genius' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed! being more articulate or better at pattern recognition isn't the same thing as painting Starry Night, or designing calculus. "Smart" is an attribute like height.

    3. Re:Inflation of the word 'genius' by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      "smartest person of a random group of 50" != the top 2% of a total population.

      The top 2% can be worded as 1 in 50 of a total population.

      There is somewhat of a difference between a sample size of 50 and one of 300 million.

    4. Re:Inflation of the word 'genius' by Wootery · · Score: 1

      +4 Insightful. Good start. Now get +5 Brilliance and you're set.

    5. Re:Inflation of the word 'genius' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Mensa is the gateway for the real High IQ societies the ones that advertise in the Mensa journal looking for people in the top 0.01% (You know, the one Sheldon would be in if he were real...and of course Wile E Coyote SUPER GENIUS) ;-)

      Oh, God !!! You mean there are other wankers even more insufferable than the mensans?!? No, please don't even bother telling me. On this occasion, ignorance really is bliss.

  19. What's the big deal? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before someone asks, yes, I am "Mensa material". I do IQ tests as a pastime. It's fun to watch shrinks stare in awe. So I could join them. As could, I'm certain, most people around here. Being in the 2% bracket isn't THAT difficult when you look at it. There are actually clubs out there with far tighter joining criteria. Also not really something I'd consider joining.

    I mean, let's be honest, why should I? Yes, it's fun to have a discussion with people who can think beyond next breakfast but it's no fun having them with people who consider themselves so "smart" and aloof to join a club that selects its members by intelligence. I mean, imagine you're good looking, would you want to join a club that only lets beautiful people join? Ponder what kind of self absorbed, shallow cunts such criteria attract. And then ponder whether you want to be part of that.

    And even more, ponder whether you want to spend at least part of your life with someone like that. And now let's imagine the worst case, just think that kids would be the results of such a union. What kind of person do you think such a child would become? Either you'll have a completely broken person who snapped under the pressure of being the expected "pinnacle of intelligence", or you get the ultimate self-absorbed asshole, or a combination of both.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:What's the big deal? by retech · · Score: 1

      Since there's a high probability they'll have a dullard as well that would be the funniest case scenario. Then those two could go at each other blaming and shaming since that average child could never be theirs.

    2. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like to go out?

    3. Re:What's the big deal? by Krishnoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean, imagine you're good looking, would you want to join a club that only lets beautiful people join?

      That's the kind of question only a nerd would ask. Seriously, did you even attend high school?

    4. Re:What's the big deal? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's fun to have a discussion with people who can think beyond next breakfast but it's no fun having them with people who consider themselves so "smart" and aloof to join a club that selects its members by intelligence.

      So, I joined up when I started a business because it was the most economical professional organization that had travel discount deals with big rental companies. And I knew where my SAT scores were so it was easy.

      I've only been to a couple meetups, but the people weren't as you suppose and the conversation was good. No better or worse than a LUG meeting or showing up at a lecture at the local college, except fewer STEM nerds than you'd expect. I associate with all sorts of people who all have valuable contributions to make, but once in a while I enjoy intellectual engagement of the sort that high-IQ people tend to offer. Some members favor the board game nights because other members tend not to be easy to beat. etc. - there are benefits to any mutual support group of like individuals.

      Point being, don't cast aspersions based on assumptions and hypotheticals when you could simply find out the truth of the matter easily enough by attending a meetup (I've never seen an ID check at a brunch or whatever). That would be the 'smart' thing to do.

      Oh, and the TFS is vomitous - surely nobody without significant mental illness could be attracted to such a thing.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re: What's the big deal? by brianerst · · Score: 1

      There's some thought that assortative mating of 'geeks' is one cause of the rise in autism rates. High IQs tend to correlate with a better than average ability for pattern matching and focus. Combine two people with those abilities and maybe you get kids who are laser focused on patterns all the time.

      It's an interesting theory (I'm the father of an autistic son so I do a lot of reading on the subject) but there's not much more than circumstantial evidence behind it. But probably as much as evidence as "the kid will be an asshole" theory...

    6. Re: What's the big deal? by ultranova · · Score: 2

      High IQs tend to correlate with a better than average ability for pattern matching and focus.

      It's almost like the IQ tests tested these very things.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people think as GP i.e that the external apparences are not vital. Most geeks or nerds do. not because there is no evidence to the contrary but because they assume certain hierarachy of values.

    8. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before someone asks, yes, I am "Mensa material". I do IQ tests as a pastime. It's fun to watch shrinks stare in awe.

      So your pastime is really "make shrinks stare in awe". IQ tests are eminently trainable, so if you've done a couple a few times you're nicely trained on IQ testing, but that doesn't necessarily make you actually smarter -- before we get into the trouble of defining intelligence and working out just what it is that IQ tests are supposed to measure. How I know this? Psychologists in the family. IQ testing is properly psychologist (learned in the workings of the mind), not psychiatrist (MD with mind disease specialisation), fare, and is rather heavy on the statistics. You've made yourself an outlier and as such your IQ scores are "off the scale", as in completely meaningless by now.

      So I could join them.

      So could I. Not that I would. N'mind dating in that self-selected demographic. I'm not dating now because I can do without the drama, n'mind the upsides. Academia is famous for all its smart people with their legendarily vicious squabbles over legendarily petty things. Now have that in a relationship. Sounds like a winning combination to me, sir! Sign me up this instant!

      As could, I'm certain, most people around here. Being in the 2% bracket isn't THAT difficult when you look at it.

      I get the sentiment but the wording is a little unfortunate, given that outside of gaming the system by training up your IQ testing performance --and you only need a modicum of cunning, not smarts, for that-- your intelligence is innate and isn't really trainable, as far as we know anyway. Born a plant, always a plant, no way around that.

      I mean, imagine you're good looking, would you want to join a club that only lets beautiful people join? Ponder what kind of self absorbed, shallow cunts such criteria attract. And then ponder whether you want to be part of that.

      Those exist, and people do join. Some people think that sort of thing important, yes.

      And even more, ponder whether you want to spend at least part of your life with someone like that. And now let's imagine the worst case, just think that kids would be the results of such a union. What kind of person do you think such a child would become? Either you'll have a completely broken person who snapped under the pressure of being the expected "pinnacle of intelligence", or you get the ultimate self-absorbed asshole, or a combination of both.

      The pressure is part of the culture in Asiatic cultures, where kids are under enormous pressure to do well in school. Some snap, some succeed, some merely disappoint their parents.

      As for the latter, I'm quite sure such has already happened, birds of a feather and all that. Of course, this merely accelerates that a bit, but it's not the only factor. It's an interesting question whether such a thing would be visible over the long term. But if we're talking self-absorbed assholes, we do stuff politicians together all the time. Do they have a history of interbreeding? Should be plenty study material available.

    9. Re:What's the big deal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Point being, don't cast aspersions based on assumptions and hypotheticals

      The assumptions, while possibly erroneous, are probably based on experience. I probably know more MENSA members than I know I do, but the ones I know are MENSA members are jackholes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:What's the big deal? by Sobrique · · Score: 3, Funny

      Q: How do you know you're tallking to a mensa member?
      A: They'll have already told you.

    11. Re: What's the big deal? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I believe someone did some research in Eindhoven, which, being the home town of tech company Philips as as major tech university, has a high ratio of engineers. Turns out there was also a higher rate of autism in kids. It's possible they also looked at genetics. I forgot the details.

    12. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reading through the comments I wonder if perhaps someone should start a club for people who don't want to be in Mensa even though they could be. (Me too)

    13. Re:What's the big deal? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Seriously, did you even attend high school?

      I went to an all boys school. So, a club which only let in the most beautiful of students would have been a very different thing indeed.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... I mean, imagine you're good looking..." ahahahahaha!

    15. Re: What's the big deal? by brianerst · · Score: 1

      Absolutely - I don't think they measure much else other than pattern matching and a specific subset of abstract reasoning. I think they're reasonably effective at measuring those skills and those skills are reasonably correlated to fitness to certain types of tasks. But that's true of any decently designed test - a test of leaping ability is useful to some degree for athletics but it'd be ridiculous to think it was the only or even the most important criteria.

    16. Re:What's the big deal? by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Before someone asks, yes, I am "Mensa material". I do IQ tests as a pastime. It's fun to watch shrinks stare in awe. So I could join them. As could, I'm certain, most people around here. Being in the 2% bracket isn't THAT difficult when you look at it. There are actually clubs out there with far tighter joining criteria. Also not really something I'd consider joining.

      It isn't difficult to join. I mean, 50% of the population is below average intelligence and education. When you segment the rest up, you end up with a more focused test taker than the other handful of intelligent guys in the room. So unless you hang out regularly with the lower 50% in intelligence, you and most of your friends would probably be eligible.

      I mean, let's be honest, why should I? Yes, it's fun to have a discussion with people who can think beyond next breakfast but it's no fun having them with people who consider themselves so "smart" and aloof to join a club that selects its members by intelligence. I mean, imagine you're good looking, would you want to join a club that only lets beautiful people join? Ponder what kind of self absorbed, shallow cunts such criteria attract. And then ponder whether you want to be part of that.

      Mensa was started right after WW2, October 1, 1946. Television, cinema, media, culture was not like it is now. There were no cool internet billionaires. There were no movies showing how cool the nerds were if you just gave them a chance. You couldn't Facebook to find friends with your interests. Intelligence wasn't really part of the social fabric of the general population compared to today.

      A high school might have a few HNICs (Head Nerds In Charge) who were beaten up, mocked, made fun of, and had their chess boards tipped over. Everyone else had probably been to war and/or in combat, and I'm going to assume most nerds didn't get that experience. They were isolated and alone. College wasn't like it is now when anyone can run up $100k in debt and join on ever lowering entrance requirements; not everyone could go into higher education in those days regardless of how smart they were. How were they going to hang out with people with their interests? Go to the bar with all the army guys talking about their experiences? Read comic books where pretty much the smart guys were all evil and beaten by the football-quarterback looking superhero? Go to a football game they might not have had an interest in?

      People that tested in a particular bracket could join a group where there were other people like them. I don't think they were being snooty and laughing at everyone around them in the 1950s feeling superior. They weren't being shallow cunts who were the silicon valley hipsters of their day.

      Mensa's constitution lists three purposes: "to identify and to foster human intelligence for the benefit of humanity; to encourage research into the nature, characteristics, and uses of intelligence; and to provide a stimulating intellectual and social environment for its members".

      Clearly a bunch of dicks.

      And even more, ponder whether you want to spend at least part of your life with someone like that.

      God forbid you want to spend time with someone you can talk to about things. This is why my primary measure of a partner is based on breast size and their understanding that a raised fist means to shut the hell up.

      Either you'll have a completely broken person who snapped under the pressure of being the expected "pinnacle of intelligence", or you get the ultimate self-absorbed asshole, or a combination of both.

      Or they're just some intelligent people who test well and get along fine with people and have learned how to handle social interactions?

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    17. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, imagine you're good looking, would you want to join a club that only lets beautiful people join?

      I believe it's called Hollywood.

      Ponder what kind of self absorbed, shallow cunts such criteria attract.

      Exactly.

      And then ponder whether you want to be part of that.

      Well, judging by all the fascination this culture has with celebrities, there are a disappointing number of people who actually do want to be a part of that. So glad I could be of assistance.

    18. Re:What's the big deal? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Shallow cunts wanting to join a club formed by shallow cunts, I can see that.

      But Mensa members are supposedly a wee bit more intelligent than the average Hollywood celebrity.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re: What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware the lure of apophenia
      And shun the furious pareidoliac.

    20. Re:What's the big deal? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I can now well understand the need for such an organization pre-internet. But today?

      Also, the big reason to tack it to IQ isn't quite obvious to me. There is a lot of very interesting people who I love to have discussions with that I'd never have a chance to meet in such a "high IQ" club.

      And, btw, I hate playing chess. It's too predictable and hence boring.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. The public face of mensa vs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to be in Mensa back in the 80s. When people found out I was in Mensa, they'd frequently express some surprise because they thought Mensans were a bunch of jerks because they'd met somebody who said he was in Mensa and who was very obnoxious, making himself out to be superior. I was surprised because most of the people I met in Mensa weren't like that. I remember throwing a party and invited people from my job and friends from Mensa, and the people from work commented later about how the Mensans at the party were down to earth regular folks and not at all like what they'd expected. I suspect that the jerks giving Mensa a bad rep don't actually go to Mensa events because what they want to do is brag and try to impress people but they can't do that if everybody else is a Mensan. But these same jerks are the ones making the most noise everywhere else and getting noticed. I will admit there are probably more nerdy, asperger's syndrome types in Mensa than the general population, but it's not that bad.

    You know what was an exaggerated but based somewhat on truth depiction of Mensa? The one done in a Simpson's episode with Stephen Hawking as guest voice at the end.

    1. Re:The public face of mensa vs by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Are you sure all those jerks were really Mensa members? It is quite possible to falsely claim mensa membership to elevate their obnoxiousness to the next level.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:The public face of mensa vs by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      People that you meet in a group that has a certain shared interest aren't necessarily going to behave the same way with people that are not part of the same group.

      When it comes down to it, almost everyone ends up behaving in a regular, down to earth way, around some people. We take our barriers down, and we consider people around us equals. But when people are surrounded by those they consider 'other', or just directly inferior, behavior can change dramatically. This is a major reason some people have a much easier way through life than others: Having the capability of making other people relate to you quickly is a major skill that makes sure you only get to face the best part of people. It's the reason some minorities have it rough: The same person that is very nice to you might be pretty terrible to them. You can even see this in groups that are trying to help minorities: If they believe you are one of the oppressors, for whatever reason, you will see how they can quickly have the exact same behaviors that they accuse others of having.

      This is very easy to notice if you have friends that provide extremely different first impressions than you do. It's amazing the different treatment that a geeky introvert male that has English as a second language and a white, all-american party girl get. Both get harassment, but from different people, who tend to be perfectly good people around the other one.

      So if some people were nice to you, and met you at a Mensa meeting, you just can't assume that they are the same kind of people around non-Mensa members, or when they think they are being watched by their peers.

    3. Re:The public face of mensa vs by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      The worst professor I ever had (over a very long academic career), or, well, the only terrible professor I ever had, claimed (repeatedly) to be a MENSA member. He would literally mock people for failing to understand course material, once causing a student to break out in tears and leave the room (and subsequently drop the class) while he continued his mockery. This is the only person I've met that boasted of being a member of MENSA, and so this is the impression that I have of MENSA members.

      Amusingly enough, he was a physics professor at a county college. No, not tenured at a research institution. Instead, he chose for himself a job where he could belittle those of us who for whatever reason couldn't make it to the ivy leagues. A true asshole.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    4. Re:The public face of mensa vs by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I hate people like that, but is is fun to push their face in it when they become so judgmental about such things. My sister had a boyfriend like that but his thing was money. In his mind the worth of a person was determined by how much the things they wore cost. One day he was showing off his new Rolex watch his parents got him for his birthday and spouting that it cost $5000 (this kid was in high school mind you) to me. My response was "What your parents couldn't afford a nice Rolex so they bought you a crappy cheap bottom of the line one instead?". It was actually fun watching him being put in his place and making him feel as little as he tried to make others feel.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:The public face of mensa vs by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Most people you know aren't assholes. It's the people you don't know who are assholes. Think about it.

    6. Re:The public face of mensa vs by Another+Mouse+Coward · · Score: 1

      This was my experience, also. I joined while living in a large (to me) town to meet intelligent people to have fun with. I'm not especially socially gifted. Today I'd probably be diagnosed with Aspbergers, So, I went where there might be like-minded people. I was in the Boise, ID group for a couple of years. First year was awesome. Then a loud-mouthed, bragging jerk joined and we all didn't know what to do to shut him down. Luckily, I moved to Seattle soon and didn't have to deal with him anymore. But all of the other 20 or so active members were really fun, gracious people. After you go to know them. Many, such as myself, were introverts and didn't open up at once to new people. I haven't been active since I moved to Seattle, so I can't attest to this group's makeup! :D But, with my experience with people, I'd say they are very likely just the same.

  21. 98th Percentile / Top 2% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mensa: an organisation which has the muppet known as Gary Bushell (google him) as a visible/named member on their website, yet still thinks it's members are the 'cream' of humanity...

    there isn't a good enough word in the english language to describe that level of crass idiocy (though no doubt, a mensameister will be along in a few minutes to prove me wrong by supplying it...and then rail mightily that how, like a good little carrot, I should just shut up and not criticise my betters..).

     

  22. Parent Is jealous that his number is.... tiny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe he just got out of the pool when they tested him and it shrank.

    I see jealous people in this thread, they are all around me. They don't even know they are jealous, but they scored low on an IQ test and need to shit on it ever since....

    1. Re:Parent Is jealous that his number is.... tiny. by narcc · · Score: 1

      I'd call that a +5 funny ... but this is what many MENSA members actually believe.

    2. Re:Parent Is jealous that his number is.... tiny. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I see jealous people in this thread, they are all around me. They don't even know they are jealous, but they scored low on an IQ test and need to shit on it ever since....

      Or, you know, lots of people have a high enough IQ but don't give a damn about Mensa.

      Unless Mensa has the full 2% of the population as members, there are clearly people who qualify but haven't joined.

      So, from Wikipedia:

      The largest national groups are American Mensa, with more than 56,000 members, British Mensa, with about 23,500 members, and Mensa Germany, with more than 10,000 members

      Doing some rough calculations, the membership in Mensa in the US is about 1% of the total number of people who qualify, because there should be about 6 million people in the US in the top 2% of IQ.

      So 99% of all people with a high enough IQ to join Mensa aren't members.

      Mensa is a self selected group, but it's hardly representative of the people which would qualify. Of the two percent of the population who qualify, only about 1% of those are members.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  23. Re:Need a high IQ match service with NO mensa memb by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Sorry. I'm so elitist that I don't feel I should grace Mensa with my presence.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. IF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Right, just ignore the fact that blacks and Hispanics consistently poll below whites and Asians in practically every IQ test in every control configuration ever devised. We are all equal!

  25. What do they call their members? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Mensies?

    1. Re:What do they call their members? by retech · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aspergers.

    2. Re:What do they call their members? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assburgers?! *chuckles*

    3. Re:What do they call their members? by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Mensies?

      It's pronounced, "Menses". You've gone and made a bloody mess of it.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
  26. Nothing like an exciting date.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with those party-animal Mensa hotties!

  27. Do not want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not want to date anyone who thinks it's important to join Mensa.

    She better be qualified for it though! :-D

  28. And not an EQ above 50 among them by brianerst · · Score: 1

    When I was eight, I thought that Mensa must be the coolest thing in the world - a Club for Geniuses! When I got a bit older, I ended up going to a few meetings (I had had a school administered IQ test done when I was skipping a grade and that was good enough for the local chapter). Between the painfully shy, the weirdos and the snobs, even my 12 year old self figured out this wasn't the club for me.

    I had hopes that maybe it was just the local chapter that was nuts but every time I hear anything about Mensa, it generally confirms my original impression...

    1. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your experience parallels mine. My biggest problem with them was that nearly all of them were Republicans. They had theirs, but they didn't want to help anyone else. Their lack of compassion for people not as smart as themselves was stunning.

    2. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by brianerst · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I had to guess, I'd say nearly all the Mensans I've ever bumped into have been liberal Democrats. The idea that "the sheeple" need to be lead by smart people who will make the best decisions for them is sort of endemic to that side of the aisle. Not that Republicans are anything to write home about, but the idea of "rule by smart people" is not the first thing that comes to mind when you think of the GOP...

      The Democrats tend to draw the wonkiest of the wonks and the elite professional class into their orbit. Identify a problem (or "problem") in society and bring together a small group of experts who will make the best decision for each of the 330 million people living in the US is the operating assumption for them. The Mensans I've run into fit into that mindset pretty well.

      It's only when you accept your own limitations and appreciate the different gifts that everybody has that you realize that no group of people, no matter how intelligent and well meaning, can possibly understand, let alone fulfill, the competing needs and desires of our diverse human family. Lay down some broadly accepted rules and provide a focused and best-in-class set of services, but otherwise, get out of the way.

    3. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Not that Republicans are anything to write home about, but the idea of "rule by smart people" is not the first thing that comes to mind when you think of the GOP...

      Republicans are all about rule by a smart elite. It's just that the word "smart" has become a tribal identifier for Liberals, so Conservatives prefer to use the euphemism "common sense".

      I don't think it's possible to go to politics without either thinking your know what's best or being hopelessly corrupt.

      It's only when you accept your own limitations and appreciate the different gifts that everybody has that you realize that no group of people, no matter how intelligent and well meaning, can possibly understand, let alone fulfill, the competing needs and desires of our diverse human family. Lay down some broadly accepted rules and provide a focused and best-in-class set of services, but otherwise, get out of the way.

      No one can possibly understand, let alone fulfill, the competing needs and desires of our diverse human family, so they better follow your political philosophy which tells them how to do just that ?-)

      Bonus points for proposing a program that's broad enough that every single government ever could be argued to follow it. Even Attila the Hun laid down rules and provided services.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No one can possibly understand, let alone fulfill, the competing needs and desires of our diverse human family, so they better follow your political philosophy which tells them how to do just that ?-)

      Governments tend to apply one-size-fits-all criteria to situations. One size never fits all, and the size this government has been designed to fit is fat and wealthy. That's why government should provide only a [hopefully reasonable] baseline and get out of the way of anyone not hurting people. Right now, our government provides almost nothing to some people who need a lot, and it provides a lot to people who need almost nothing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is sadly true for a lot of people.

      Mensa is for smart people with no knowledge or skills, just intelligence.
      Mensa is a torch sitting lens-top on the table, no light flashing anywhere.
      Mensa is Malcolm from Malcolm in the Middle, an intelligent brat who doesn't know how lucky he is and does nothing with the gifts he has but throw them in peoples faces. Just most of them that is, not all of them. And more recently compared to earlier on in its life. I assume those other not shit people are only there due to their interest in intelligent retards.

      If you want to join any group, join a group with skills and interests behind it. Usually any of those groups aren't filled with absolute idiots or snobbish pricks, or people with the emotional maturity of a grape.

    6. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so Conservatives prefer to use the euphemism "common sense".

      And then propose things which make no sense whatsoever.

      Folksy appeal of platitudes and bad ideas doesn't make you smart.

      Look at Sarah Palin. She's an idiot.

    7. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

    8. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by westlake · · Score: 1

      The idea that "the sheeple" need to be lead by smart people who will make the best decisions for them is sort of endemic to that side of the aisle.

      It's a single data point, strictly anecdotal, pure chance, perhaps.

      But since the day I first purchased a dial-up modem, I have never heard words like "sheepie" used outside a geek forum.

      The Democrats tend to draw the wonkiest of the wonks and the elite professional class into their orbit.

      That is a pretty fair description of the framers of the American Constitution.

      Though there are exceptions to the downward intellectual spiral on the right --- Ross Douthat at The New York Times, the people involved in this reformist project, the writers associated with The American Conservative and Front Porch Republic, and the "Postmodern Conservatives" at National Review Online --- the general trend on the right in recent years has been away from reflection on ideas for their own sake, and toward fashioning an ideology to galvanize the "conservative movement" and electorally empower its chosen political vehicle: the Republican Party.

      George Will has shown an admirable independence of mind over the years: denouncing Nixon's corruption during the pre-resignation period of the Watergate scandal, when most Republicans were still defending him; calling Americans "undertaxed" during the early years of the Reagan revolution; criticizing the Iraq War at a time when dissent from George W. Bush's prosecution of the War on Terror was verboten on the right. And then there was his thoughtful 1983 book Statecraft as Soulcraft, which made a communitarian case for using government to instill civic virtue.

      One wonders what the author of that book would make of the George Will of today --- peddler of Tea-Party-approved libertarian bromides, promoter of know-nothing climate-change denialism, serial spewer of bile against the all-purpose bogeyman of "progressivism." (Reading Will's column these days, you get the feeling he thinks the Republican Party needs to position itself to the right of Theodore Roosevelt circa 1912.)

      The sad, sorry decline of George F. Will

    9. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Politically, Mensans tend to reflect local culture in each place. Ideologues find this highly disconcerting.

    10. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod point bait for the Libertarian fanatics who don't bother to notice that your entire post contradicts itself in the way you think you know what works best for everyone.

    11. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Counter-anecdote.

      My dad was active in Mensa when I was younger and he was newly divorced. My dad is an unapologetic anti-democrat; I think Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan may be above Jesus in his world view.

      As near as I can tell, his interest in Mensa was for social networking with people that had a chance of understanding him. He's brilliant, loyal, fair, judgmental, and not at all sentimental. He has great difficulty expressing himself emotionally. Only certain people "get" him, and that's fine with him as long as there's at least one.... He's a hardcore INTJ.

      He has no desire to run the world or to run other people's lives.

      I haven't bothered to apply officially for Mensa, but I think I'd be borderline for admission. I'm also NOT a technocrat and ALSO not a liberal democrat.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    12. Re:And not an EQ above 50 among them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had theirs? I guess your club was the anti-Mensa, you know the ones too lazy or dumb to get their own and want us to give them stuff so they can play video games and eat junk food until they're too fat to fit through the door of their parents' basement.

  29. Two Geniuses... by QuadEddie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When two geniuses mate, the result is often an autistic child: http://archive.wired.com/wired...

  30. Click through.. by Rick+in+China · · Score: 0

    Check out the mensa website photos advertising taking the test to use on the match site - there's a woman in the middle. She looks like she is dateable! If you're after fugly butch lesbians.

  31. Society for misfits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never met a Mensa member who has not been an utter twat. Quite why you would want to join a society whose purpose appeared to be chiefly to allow yourself to announce to other people that you are smarter than them I have no idea.

  32. I turned down a chance to join MENSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I am smart enough to know I don't need to be part of a group to be smart.

    1. Re:I turned down a chance to join MENSA by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Because I am smart enough to know I don't need to be part of a group to be smart.

      It's the opposite: you need to be smart to be part of the group. And somehow people like being part of a group.

  33. Re:Too many Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the two mods that voted you down are Republicans.

    I found this page:

    http://www.mensaww.org/

    That mentions their no alcohol rule. I guess Republicans aren't smart enough to understand that prohibition didn't work. Those stupid Republicans are still living in the 1800s.

  34. great way to increase rate of autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you don't want to have the genes of two smart, anti-social people to mate. You'll just increase the rate of traits that make you intelligent in moderation and handicapped when taken to the extreme.

    My wife has good memory; I have good logical reasoning. My son is quite smart, but that is because of his early interest in starfall.com. His iq would be lower if he hadn't had that headstart, but his intelligence would be the same.

    1. Re:great way to increase rate of autism by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      you don't want to have the genes of two smart, anti-social people to mate

      So smart == anti-social?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:great way to increase rate of autism by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      So smart == anti-social?

      Yes.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  35. Re:Too many Republicans by aviators99 · · Score: 2

    That mentions their no alcohol rule. I guess Republicans aren't smart enough to understand that prohibition didn't work. Those stupid Republicans are still living in the 1800s.

    There was no prohibition in the 1800s.

  36. Makes sense by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the US, but in the Netherlands there are dating sites that cater specifically to the "highly educated", i.e. people with university degrees. I understand the idea behind them: you're more likely to have something in common with someone who's roughly in the same ball park as you when it comes to intelligence. This is simply that idea taken one step further. It takes a special kind of person to join mensa (but intellectually and character-wise), and so people that do are likely to have more in common with each other than with people who don't.

    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did not work with my wife but I guess that was because she was evil woman and this did not mix well with angel like me.

    2. Re:Makes sense by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the US, but in the Netherlands there are dating sites that cater specifically to the "highly educated", i.e. people with university degrees.

      In fact, it seems to be the most lucrative market for dating sites, considering how many cater specifically for that market.

  37. Jane oh Jane, Sweet Jane (It's me, OP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't you run away with me? You can tell me all about things, and I can listen!

    1. Re:Jane oh Jane, Sweet Jane (It's me, OP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well met, follow stalker.

      We should form a club; people obsessed with 'female' pseudonyms.

  38. if they were so fucking smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they wouldn't need help from a scammy web site of questionable integrity to meet girls (or guys.. whatever).

    1. Re:if they were so fucking smart... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Not all dating sites are scammy, though admittedly some of them definitely are.

  39. So the lesson is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Mensans are just about as regular as anybody else?

  40. Contradiction by grimJester · · Score: 1

    Before someone asks, yes, I am "Mensa material". I do IQ tests as a pastime. It's fun to watch shrinks stare in awe.

    Ironically, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

  41. The real niche by ShadowSpectre · · Score: 1

    What we really need is a site to match male MENSA geniuses with strippers and ex strippers. Oscar Wilde: "A woman who considers herself an intellectual clearly has forgotten what her genitals are for". In my case, my first wife was a research librarian, my 2nd was a stripper. -I should have married my 2nd wife first, because if I had, I'd have NEVER married my 1st wife.

  42. Match.com, by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    Mensa Create Dating Site For Pretentious Geniuses

    FTFY

  43. I left MENSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a MENSA member, but it didn't work for me - having a high IQ is no guarantee of being an interesting or entertaining person, plus the kind of people that really want "MENSA member" in fat print on their clothes are exactly the kind of people I dislike (it's equivalent to needing have "Armani" in large print on your clothes for it to be seen instead of it being just understated quality.

    I just joined on a lark, as someone else told me I ought to take the test. So I did, I was invited and joined British MENSA which was interesting but I didn't have much time for it. When I moved abroad I had to leave British MENSA and join the local version of it and that was so rife with politics that I decided I could do without the hassle and left, helped by the fact that the people I met were not really interesting.

    Does being a (former) MENSAn make me different? Nah. I just have a really good feel for structures and I'm quick at catching logical fallacies, but I don't think it gives me the right to claim I'm better or worse than anyone else. I detest snobbery in any form, but that's just me.

  44. Re:Need a high IQ match service with NO mensa memb by clam666 · · Score: 1

    You've never dated a stupid elitist have you.

    --
    I'm a satanic clam.
  45. I see by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Aryan beauty seeks Mensa-member for building the Master-rass.
    Looks unimportant.
    Please do not apply if you are below 200.

    1. Re:I see by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      A lot of tall women would reply to that!

  46. Mensa? You are kidding of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't see the point of Mensa. 1 in 50 isn't exactly a discriminating criteria. Seven billion people in the world, 140 million could join Mensa.

    Aim for the Prometheus Society, the Triple Nine Society or the Mega Society.

    Of course all of these are a bit of a wank really. Just live your life the way you want to and don't bother trying to fit into rather silly boxes.

  47. But people forget what MENSA concluded by popo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Folks, MENSA was a study intended to track the successes of those with high IQ's as they progressed through life.

    Somewhat unsurprisingly, the study revealed NO CORRELATION.

    Zippo. Nada. None. Zilch.

    People with high-IQ's were no more successful in career terms than people with average IQ's. (I have a high IQ, and I wish the correlation had been tighter! :D )

    So at the end of the day "success" is a combination of multiple factors and IQ alone is non-determinant. So who cares about IQ anyway?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Somewhat unsurprisingly, the study revealed NO CORRELATION.

      There is a high correlation of 0.90 to 0.95 between the prestige rankings of occupations, as rated by the general population, and the average general intelligence scores of people employed in each occupation. [1]

      The correlation between income and IQ scores is 0.40. The correlation is higher at higher levels of education and it increases with age, stabilizing when people reach their highest career potential in middle age. Even when education, occupation and socioeconomic background are held constant, the correlation does not vanish. [2]

      Your move.

      [1] Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational
      attainment and job performance.
      Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

      [2] Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor.
      . Westport, CT: Praeger

    2. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have an IQ that repeatedly tested somewhere between 150-170. I crashed out of two universities, spent most of the 90's off my face one way or another and now work in IT support for a government department. High IQ doesn't always correlate to greater success - though it has helped me find a niche where I can slack more efficiently and still pull in a decent salary so I guess I'm not doing too bad.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    3. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      the study revealed NO CORRELATION.

      Zippo. Nada. None. Zilch.

      Most studies have found an IQ to income correlation of 0.4 to 0.5. That is not particularly strong, but it isn't zero. The correlation is weaker for people with very high IQs. Someone with an IQ of 100 (normal) will earn much more than someone at 60 (mildly retarded). Someone with an IQ of 120 will do significantly better than someone at 100. But someone with an IQ of 160 (genius) will do little better than someone at 120, on average.

    4. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correlation between success in life and a high score on a IQ test is rather high. Not as high as having wealthy parents but still high. People with higher than average IQ spend less time in jail, divorce more seldome, have higher income etc.

      How well it measures success on an individual level is a completely different story.

    5. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Want success? Learn how to SCHMOOZE and be a salesman.

      CEO's are stupid as boxes of rocks, but they can sell themselves and talk others into doing things and convince people they know what they are doing.

      Corporate success is 90% bullshit and 10% smarts.

      On a side note, if you have an IQ of 150-170 and are not doing your own research or tinkering to come up with something new, you are wasting your brain. Start tinkering, start building, there HAS to be something you know you can do better or build better.

      I have several patents under my belt, no I'm not making buttloads of money off of them but I created something that makes the world better. I also build and do things that others can not do. I can modify and reprogram Car ECM systems in my sleep, 90% of the automotive engineers at GM cant do what I can do. (Note: I did work for GM for a short time, 100% of their management is populated with raging low IQ assholes so I quit in less than 30 days) And I learned all this by hacking and tinkering.

      So get off your ass and start doing. Smart people do not become CEO unless daddy had billions already (Elon Musk for example) Build things, hack things, modify things. I know a lot of high IQ people and they all have one thing in common. Being lazy. Smartest guy I know wastes most of every day playing Xbox and smoking pot.

      Your failures are your own, and your success is also your own. What do you want more of?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Mostly because when you get above IQ 150 you start to get social retardation, and social interaction smarts are the largest part of income.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

      Q. "So who cares about IQ anyway?"
      A. MENSA members!

      --
      -><- no .sig is good sig.
    8. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On a side note, if you have an IQ of 150-170 and are not doing your own research or tinkering to come up with something new, you are wasting your brain. ... Your failures are your own, and your success is also your own. What do you want more of?

      Spending time with my family. Much better use of my high IQ brain than just about anything else.

    9. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by C0R1D4N · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I bet there's a stronger correlation between family affluence and career success.

    10. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      So at the end of the day "success" is a combination of multiple factors and IQ alone is non-determinant. So who cares about IQ anyway?

      Maybe those who don't care about "success?" :)

      In my experience people who are more intelligent tend to be less likely to be influenced by fashion/tradition/culture/etc, and the typical definition of success is part of that.

    11. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Mensan, and I am super lazy. I read all the time, but only for entertainment (such as Star Trek books). I use the computer all the time - but just to look around on the web. I don't create anything. Mentally, I am heck of lazy. No real drive to do anything else either.

    12. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Valvar · · Score: 2

      I guess the reason for why you aren't getting any mod points is that reality is uncomfortable. And it's surprising that not more people on here, a site where most visitors are presumably above the average intellectual level, understand how correlations work. Oh, and there is also this, somewhat simple summary which I think is fairly good at disarming the majority of the drivel that is usually heard in these debates: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    13. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      Your use of :D makes me question your claims. REAL intelligent people use asian emoticons xD.

    14. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by dcw3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll agree with you on...

      Want success? Learn how to SCHMOOZE and be a salesman.

      But you lost me at...

      Corporate success is 90% bullshit and 10% smarts.

      If you're so smart, can you back that up? :-)

      I'd argue that except for those who got there via nepotism, it's extremely rare that someone is a successful businessperson w/o generally having their shit together. Sure, we hear about f-ups all the time, and everyone loves to criticize the boss because we think we know better, but in the big scheme of things, the frequency of those bad decisions is generally outweighed by the smart ones that you don't hear about because they're not newsworthy.

      Maybe I'm just speaking from my own experience, and maybe it depends upon your definition of success. My dad was a small business owner, and I've known several others, all of whom I would call intelligent and successful. FWIW, I qualified for MENSA back in the 70s, but never joined.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    15. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CEO here (not as dumb as a box of rocks).

      In Dungeons and Dragons, there is a list of skills on the right side of your character sheet. It includes things like "climb a wall", "ride a horse", "pick a lock", and "find traps". Oftentimes, the "Convince other characters to do what you want" (Diplomacy) skill is overlooked.

      The way to run a successful organization is to get many people to accomplish a single goal (yours). The skill to do so is highly valuable. It may be the only skill which matters for success as a CEO, manager, or other high-level position.

      Side note - there are other ways to make money. "Basement software developer" (use my app!), "garage inventor" (license my patent!), and "venture capitalist" (I'm buying twitter on leverage!) are all real options where interaction with people is minimized. However, if you want corporate success (your own or otherwise), the skill that you want is leading groups of people.

    16. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      While I get the idea of social interaction breaking down between people with disparate social protocols, I am fairly certain that in the opinion of monkeys, we are socially retarded. It would certainly explain why they feel justified in throwing poo at us. It does not mean that they are, nor that we are; that's just a face saving ego trip.

      That said, try not to internalize the negative opinions of others in an attempt to get them to accept you. I find that people of all intelligences will abuse that quirk of social conformity to try to out compete others, usually out of jealousy, occasionally out of malice.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    17. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      While I find your comments interesting and I think there's some truth in there, I think it's ridiculous to assert that all intelligent people should be tinkerers, builders, and tech-oriented. I think one of the reasons that we have so many idiots in management and politics is that when a kid is good at math we steer them toward engineering whether it's something they actually enjoy or not. One of the most appealing things about non-engineering fields to a lot of people is that they can side-step intense math courses. For instance, I was appalled to learn that my girlfriend's nursing program required no more than a basic algebra course and bio/chemistry 101. After that pretty much everything was nursing specific like A&P and pharmaceuticals.

      Mathematics is a pure logical exercise that has value beyond working with numbers.

      if you have an IQ of 150-170 and are not doing your own research or tinkering to come up with something new, you are wasting your brain.

      Perhaps this falls under the "something new" category, but Michael Crichton wrote some pretty damn good books and he went to Harvard Medical School. Neil deGrasse Tyson is pretty brilliant and his main occupation is that of a pop figure who teaches and evangelizes science. Nate Silver uses his intelligence to predict the outcomes of sporting events. Okay, maybe that last one wasn't the greatest example.

      My point is that it would greatly benefit society if companies were run by people who understood more than ROI, if politicians did more than play a social game with one another, and if educators weren't limited to their speciality. I can understand wagging the finger at those who don't contribute to society, but I interpreted your post as saying that contributing to technology and industry is the only way.

      I think IQ is an irrelevant measurement. When it comes to mathematics, I think it's a failure of our education system that we allow students to graduate (both high school and college) without a strong foundation in that subject. The same goes for biology and chemistry. Every day I'm confronted by people who believe the most inane things because they don't have a basic understanding of biology or chemistry. But now I'm just ranting.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    18. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then by that logic, higher IQ should correlate with lower income, which it doesn't.

    19. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wastes most of every day"
      Having fun and enjoying the relatively short time you have doesn't seem like a waste to me. Maybe he really is the smarter one, after all.

    20. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Provocateur · · Score: 2

      Smartest guy I know wastes most of every day playing Xbox and smoking pot.

      Dammit you swore not to tell! Now Daddy's gonna cut off my allowance. Next pizza's on you, pal

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    21. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Bismuthprince · · Score: 1

      A list compiled by mostly if not exclusively white persons who scored well in IQ tests determine that scoring well in IQ tests and being white means you are the best kind of person and the rest is less so. As a non-white person with a very low IQ (116); I'll admit that I am entirely useless to society with no redeeming factors; but I still have to note that list has a high "our club is the best club" factor throughout.

    22. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have several patents under my belt, no I'm not making buttloads of money off of them but I created something that makes the world better.

      You created a legal restriction for others wishing to create things, and you see this as making the world better?

      I'd argue that openly publishing your designs for the world to use freely would make the world better. What you did makes your world better.

      Otherwise, I completely agree with your post. All too often, ambition and intelligence are inversely correlated. I like to think of it the other way around, though. Perhaps some of us are smart enough to know better than to bust our asses for no good reason. Personally, I'd rather get some good sleep than chase after more shiny.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    23. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 0

      The way to run a successful organization is to get many people to accomplish a single goal (yours). The skill to do so is highly valuable. It may be the only skill which matters for success as a CEO, manager, or other high-level position.

      I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think what you're calling a skill is in reality called a net positive bank account and the ability to sign paychecks.

      The carrot of salary and the stick of unemployment are what's getting many people to accomplish a single goal. True leadership is what gets people to line up in support of a cause at no immediate benefit (and indeed, even great personal risk) to themselves. One who can compel men to give their lives for a cause is a great leader; one who can get wage slaves to try to not get fired is mediocre at best. Talk to me about CEO's "skills" when you can point out a company that told their workers they wouldn't be getting paid anymore and still had workers the next day.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    24. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Your friend sounds amazingly successful. All his needs are met and he has a ton of leisure time, sounds like really low stress. Success isn't all dollars and cents.

    25. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by neurovish · · Score: 1

      On a side note, if you have an IQ of 150-170 and are not doing your own research or tinkering to come up with something new, you are wasting your brain. Start tinkering, start building, there HAS to be something you know you can do better or build better.

      meh, that sounds like a lot of work

    26. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      116 is not a "very low" IQ score. It is above average in fact. Whoosh?

    27. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Bismuthprince · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more clear. It's not a very low IQ in general, it's very average; but on this site I believe it's easily in the bottom 20%. Most people I know tell me they have an IQ averaging around 130-140 so I've always considered myself the dummy of the group.

    28. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by sycodon · · Score: 1

      There is an inverse relationship between claims of intelligence and actual intelligence.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    29. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony of citing wikipeda in order to prove something is drivel.

    30. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by PeterPiper · · Score: 1

      You are just flat out wrong. While IQ alone is not a guarantee of success, other qualities like work ethic, goal orientation, etc., are every bit as important, all other things being equal, high IQ DOES correlate to greater success. It is possible that one study that you saw did not show this, but this has been studied a lot, and ALL the studies I have seen show a correlation.

      --
      Peter
    31. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're the "dummy" for believing everyone that tells you their IQ is 130-140.

    32. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most people lie. They lie about how much money they make, their IQ, how often they get laid, how good they are at giving head, how much they paid for their house, how fast or green their car is etc etc etc.

      Beyond that all people lie to themselves about something.

      I've been using deflation factors for decades. For example to calculate a 'Bismuthprince' deflation factor I've got to observe (as objectively as I can, better if my ego is not involved) you do something that you will subsequently talk about. Better if I can also hear about it in about a year, so I can add a time factor ego deflation factor. You shouldn't know what I'm doing.

      I then apply that deflation factor (always in the direction that shrinks your ego) to all things you subsequently tell me.

      Average for Americans is about 30-40% + 5-10%/year. The distribution is not normal. The real nuts have crazy large factors. Which accounts for why they have a compulsion to take credit for others work, even when it's obvious to everyone. (I'm thinking of one case where a dude was taking credit for my work, from my office, having just heard of the results. Calling the other person that did some of the work, to say what he had just accomplished.) Classic blind spot/tell. I called him on it, he claimed it never happened, 30 seconds later. Needed a shrink.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    33. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      You really ought to find a place to work where you, and everyone around you, can do more then 'just enough not to get fired'.

      You will enjoy your life a lot more, even if you're paid less. Toxic workplaces are toxic.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    34. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given my experience of those with high IQs I'd put that down to how highly deficiencies are correlated with that level of intelligence.

      I only know one person with an IQ north of 160 who doesn't obviously lack social skills, but they do have epilepsy. It kinda reminds me of running evolutionary algorithms, you often occasionally get cool features in a generation, but they're usually hamstrung with other junk. For the successful mutation to hold it needs to have formed without fucking anything else up and where this is a significant change this becomes less and less likely.

      FWIW, I score 160-180, have ADHD, Aspergers, Dyslexia, coeliac disease and I have a minor physical mutation in my toe. I'd say I'm moderately successful in my career, but I could've done a lot better without the issues I faced relating to those diagnosis.

    35. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by freakmn · · Score: 2

      Sometimes I wonder if the reason that people of high IQ are lazy are that they've never learned the value of hard work. As a high IQ person (and non-practicing Mensan), I breezed through school while putting in a minimum amount of effort. An 'A' was an 'A' and more effort was fruitless. College was a bit tougher, but never really had to put my nose to the grindstone. I've noticed that I'm comfortable being lazy. Basically spent the first 18-22 years of my life training myself to do the bare minimum and surpassing my peers. Once introduced to the real world, it was a shock to be expected to be continuously putting in effort, or at least making that appearance. I really think that schools are setting up high IQ people for failure. And that's the story of why I'm on slashdot at work.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    36. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Why repeatedly? When I went through the public school system, I only got tested once. I have no memory of the test, I don't think they told us what is was for at the time. I only found out about it when I got my records after I graduated high school. I don't even know which year it was taken.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    37. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's because stupid people need smart people to do things. Luckily smart people are not easily convinced to work for free.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    38. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 2

      You're mistaking me for someone that likes to work. I don't. I'll find the workplace you describe once people start hiring professional sleepers. Even then, I wouldn't be surprised if I developed insomnia and grew to hate that which I now love.

      Being compelled to do things not of your own volition is toxic. Unfortunately, that's how society is structured.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    39. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "try not to internalize the negative opinions of others in an attempt to get them to accept you"

      SO you consider Tourets as a healthy way to interact...

      "Hi jack you ugly motherfucker! Are you still a complete douschebag? How about that worthless son of yours?" is better than "Hi jack nice to see you! how is your kids doing?"

      I think lumpy hit is dead on with the "retarted" statement.

    40. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you if the world did not have Corporations in it. I had to patent them to protect myself. Otherwise IBM would have taken my idea, patented it themselves and then sued me for selling my own invention.

      Until Patent reform is real you MUST file your own patents to protect yourself because All corporations are 100% evil and will fuck you over if you give them the chance.

      Why do you think TESLA has patents that they allow others to use for free? Because if they did not patent them, someone else would and use it as a weapon against them.

      and if a small time company came to me saying. " we really want to use your patent" I would (and have) negotiate a very, very, reasonable contract with them. IBM or HP? they get to pay me through the nose because they can afford to.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    41. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet there's a stronger correlation between family affluence and career success.

      Because intelligence is inheritable.

    42. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by chispito · · Score: 1
      This is a contradiction. It is not easy to do these things, whether they are done for good or evil. If your measure of intelligence does not account for understanding other people, it is flawed.

      CEO's are stupid as boxes of rocks, but they can sell themselves and talk others into doing things and convince people they know what they are doing.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    43. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      That's because intelligence and personality are independent variables. Success is a combination of persistence, affability and charisma. If you find a person with these characteristics AND intelligence, get out of the way as fast as you can.

    44. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I should have been more clear. It's not a very low IQ in general, it's very average; but on this site I believe it's easily in the bottom 20%. Most people I know tell me they have an IQ averaging around 130-140 so I've always considered myself the dummy of the group.

      It's in the top 16% of scores if you are in the US. It's probably average to above average here.

    45. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      the study revealed NO CORRELATION.

      Zippo. Nada. None. Zilch.

      Most studies have found an IQ to income correlation of 0.4 to 0.5. That is not particularly strong, but it isn't zero. The correlation is weaker for people with very high IQs. Someone with an IQ of 100 (normal) will earn much more than someone at 60 (mildly retarded). Someone with an IQ of 120 will do significantly better than someone at 100. But someone with an IQ of 160 (genius) will do little better than someone at 120, on average.

      Higher IQ's likely get diverted into research and education which may not pay as well as something like investment banking. We should really start tracking sociopath scores and seeing if they have any correlation with income.

    46. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Today, I agree. However, that's only the case since 2011. Previously, we had a first-to-invent system (in theory, at least), and sufficient documentation of your invention would have been sufficient to invalidate any patents granted to others for the same invention at a later date.

      Either way, I can't fault you for your actions. Even before we transitioned to a first-to-file system, it was either patent or get fucked. An inventor tinkering in his garage is unlikely to have the financial resources to enter into litigation against a giant corporation. Thus, in practice, it's always been a first-to-file system, and any self-interested person would be wise to patent their inventions as soon as possible.

      However, we're talking about making the world better. Sometimes making the world better necessarily involves personal sacrifice, like sacrificing one's own potential profits, sacrificing ones one's ability to sell one's very own inventions. Can you say with certainty that the world is better off with you selling your invention instead of IBM or HP selling it? Perhaps, perhaps not. In any case, you say you're reasonable regarding licensing fees, but who are we to comment on whether the fees you set are truly low enough to make the world a better place? If there were no fee, that would necessarily be the case, but as long as the fees are nonzero, it's not entirely obvious that the benefits offered by your inventions are truly (as opposed to economically) more valuable than the fees that you charge.

      That being said, congrats on figuring out a way to meaningfully contribute to society. I apologize for (but can't resist) using your positive comment as a platform for an anti-patent socialist rant. I acknowledge that it's more likely than not that your patents do qualify as a creation that makes the world better. I just enjoy challenging people to be critical of their own accomplishments, since it's much easier to be proud of one's accomplishments than it is to be critical of them.

      Relevant observation: Thomas Edison's greedy ass created stuff (okay, well, his lab assistants did at least) that made the world a better place. So did Michelangelo. Maybe it's just me, but I see one as a rent-seeking cocksucker and the other as someone who truly dedicated his life to humankind. I'm just sayin'.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    47. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its posts like these that validate the notion that a high IQ has absolutely no correlation with intelligence. 6 wide, sweeping generalizations about various groups of people without a hint of self-awareness. classic dunning–kruger

    48. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You won't know it til you see it. If you ever happen to get into one of those place, you'll magically find you enjoy coming into work every day.
      Until you hit that ( and you may not) it's hard to describe.
      BTW: I'm NOT in that situation, was a few years back, didn't realize it.

    49. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      You know, the closest I ever came to that situation was when I delivered pizza for Dominos. Second closest was when I was a cabbie in Maine.

      I like jobs where there's really no consequence for underperformance and no requirement for thinking. Jobs where I can spend half the work day just relaxing and listening to music, or reading a good book (I read War&Peace, among other length tomes, as a cabbie). Jobs where nobody checks up on me to see if I'm on schedule. Jobs where I can call out sick and it's never a problem. Jobs where I don't give a shit, and nobody expects me to give a shit.

      Jobs that pay minimum wage (or less, in the case of being a cabbie). That shit doesn't pay the bills, though. And there's a lot of fucking bills.

      If you know of any jobs like this that pay as much as my software developer gig, I'm all ears. In my experience, however, employers don't pay people big bucks to chill out. The idea that work is supposed to be magical and fulfilling is quaint. I wonder if the miners and farmers of yesteryear pined for fulfilling employment like everyone does today.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    50. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on missing the point: Don't become the retard others keep claiming you are just to fit into their pigeon hole for you.

      Although, in this case I suppose it's more a matter of one monkey gets his ass kicked, so he tries to kick the ass of someone even "lesser" than him. I'm not saying you are monkeys. It's just that the simpler variant of the similar protocol is easier to follow.

      But, hey, if you want to keep rationalizing your own choices and garner kudos by disparaging others, go ahead. You are perfectly entitled to be subservient if you wish. That is a major component of normal social interaction.

      Oh, and thank you for putting words in my mouth that have no business being there. I assume Tourette's is a mild and somewhat personal obsession of yours?

      That said: Tourette's isn't unhealthy because you don't like nor understand what they say. Tourette's is unhealthy because the person with it is unable to suppress a maladaptive response to stimuli, basically the outburst, which may or may not be an objectionable word. The "bad words" are just what people harp on when they think of Tourette's because it is a mild taboo.

      I doubt you are claiming intelligence is taboo, correct?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    51. Re: But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been amusing to watch the self-reported IQ scores inflate as the comments progress. Yours gave me a special chuckle. I wish I had data on how many of the scores reported here today were from legitimate IQ tests, how many were ego-building "click to take your IQ test" Facebook or web surveys, and how many were just made up by people who didn't know enough about the test to be able to fabricate realistic-looking results.

    52. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You cant make the world a better place as long as Evil greedy people exist.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    53. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On a side note, if you have an IQ of 150-170 and are not doing your own research or tinkering to come up with something new, you are wasting your brain. Start tinkering, start building, there HAS to be something you know you can do better or build better."

      here is my response.

      The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of blood and when the drains finally scab over, all the vermin will drown. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll look down and whisper "No." They had a choice, all of them.

      I am under no obligation to make the world a better place for those of lower IQ.

    54. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Bismuthprince · · Score: 1

      That is a great formula. If I were fancy enough to casually wear hats, I'd tip it to you.

    55. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

      I am much the same way, although never joined Mena, had the IQ scores, never saw a reason to join, could always find smart people to talk to on my own. I also really don't think Mensa is as elite as they pretend to be, as all you have to do is score in the top couple of percent of the population on any one a number of IQ tests. Which I suspect drops the entrance requirement down by a few percent however you cut it.

    56. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Smartest guy I know wastes most of every day playing Xbox and smoking pot.

      It's you isn't it. You're the pot smoker fragging me in CoD.

      Your measure of intelligence is based on how many Doritos crumbs are scattered around?

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    57. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by oldmac31310 · · Score: 2

      If I am not mistaken, Michelangelo mainly dedicated his life to promoting himself, winning big commissions from the wealthiest patrons and cared little for anyone else. True, he was hugely talented and creative but he wasn't painting and sculpting out of a sense of altruism. Or are you saying that he was the 'rent-seeking cocksucker'?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    58. Re: But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! You're joking right? IQ is capacity for intelligence. Intelligence is only gained by experience. IQ may be slighly genetic, but intelligence has nothing to do with genetics.

    59. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      I'm quite lazy as well, and have also coasted through life on being able to pull off a win at the last minute. Didn't do the homework? I'll bang something out between classes and it will be better than what most people spent hours slaving over. Didn't study for the test? I learned most of it while staring at the ceiling in class so I can pull off an A to help make up for the homework I didn't feel like doing. Hell, my interviewing (read: bullshitting) skills paired with my intelligence are good enough that I'm making far more money than my effort really deserves.

      I don't know if schools are necessarily setting people up, but I was certainly never instilled with a work ethic. Which is why I too am perusing Slashdot at work.

    60. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by metlin · · Score: 1

      I am going to offer a slightly different perspective.

      I work for a management consulting firm, and we hire (arguably) some of the smartest people in the world who are usually good with both critical thinking and with the soft skills. It sounds like an easily accomplished task, but it really is not. Some of the most analytical and quantitative people in the world also come with personality quirks that makes them unsuitable for most client facing professions.

      I have also had my fair share of experience interacting with CEOs, both big and small. And it has been my experience that among successful people (the way society values success today anyway), there are two key elements to being at the top.

      One is strategic thinking. Not everyone is capable of it, no matter what people may think. Some people are great at focusing on one problem; others are capable of bringing in disparate problems together and finding holistic, long-term solutions. This is a non-trivial task, and one with incredibly devastating consequences in the event of failure (and people do focus on failure, which is understandable, but discounting the success of social, political, and economic progress is disingenuous and silly). A good doctor is great at one problem, but cannot bring to bear the breadth of their experience to handle a disease outbreak, which has much wider consequences.

      The second is capital. Modern society runs on capital. You would be staggered at just how much day-to-day credit companies use to run. If the cogs in the wheel were to stop, they will close their doors in a week. Take away the access to capital and you will be stuck at status quo. And identifying which ideas and which cogs in the wheel deserve capital is also one of onerous responsibility.

      And that is the real reason executives and people in financial services (capital) get paid as much as they do. It doesn't matter whether or not you are in private or public sector -- those jobs are incredibly demanding, not the least because the burden of responsibilities demands a far more diligent performance.

      An entrepreneur can create new ideas, but to bring them to bear on market and to make a company successful requires a different kind of expertise. There's a reason even Google brought in Eric Schmidt as a CEO from the outside -- from having an IPO to exploring growth strategies, running a company is a rare and valuable expertise.

      And I am pretty egalitarian (in that y'all muggles look the same), and yet, I would say that the value society places on strategic thinking and capital allocation is justified.

      Now, is this sometimes done blindly, without regard to performance? Of course, and that is a structural problem (e.g. Wall Street). And are there other professions (e.g. scientists) who should get similar incentives, but do not? Of course, and that is a perception problem. But neither of those really discount the importance of the jobs many executives play.

      And at the end of the day, there is certainly a trade-off. People in those jobs work with little sleep, work brutal hours, and find it difficult to make time for their family, let alone anything else. Most successful CEOs I know wakes up at brutally early hours (~4 am) and are stressed beyond repair. They trade a relatively structured, stress-free life for one that offers great risk with great rewards. And ultimately, that's what society rewards. No guts, no glory doc.

      For every Associate at McKinsey or Goldman who burns through 80 hour weeks, there are others who settle for a 9-5 job with a cute barista girlfriend and play pool on the weekends. For every 20 year old who partied through college with debt, there are many, many others who scored perfect GPAs and had clearly defined goals in life. For every geek who started coding in middle school and dropped out and played Counter Strike, there is a kid who busted ass and made it in life. Intelligence only goes so far -- structure, planning, and hard work go a lot farther.

      Whether or not you like it, success is cumulative -- and course correction is a lot harder later in life than it is earlier.

    61. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Why did you become a developer?

      If you can't see development as an enjoyable puzzle to solve, you made the wrong carrier choice. You will never be any good at it.

      That said; work will always be work. Some days won't be pure joy.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    62. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have no idea what my IQ is. I'm definitely very smart, but also very lazy and don't want to struggle on a test. I also have good days and slow days and I've let my brain vacation too much over the years (IQ is most definitely not a constant). I only had one IQ type test but it was when I was a kid and I never learned the score but some people seemed quite impressed.

      Overall though the intelligence helps but I'd much rather get rid of it and replace it with a strong work ethic and ambition. Intelligence meant that I could slide through a lot without too much effort, school was easy, college was easy, and I never had to study. Whereas keeping my nose to the grindstone is hard, stepping up and taking charge is hard, keeping organized is hard, managing my personal affairs is hard, and so forth. In the big overall pictures, I am very much below average I think except for that one thing.

    63. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Success varies. I would absolutely despise being a CEO, it would not make me feel like a success. I don't even want to be a manager. Why do such silly things become the measure of success?

    64. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's like needing both a good engine and a supply of fuel; if you have one but not the other then it doesn't get you very far. Similarly, if you're really smart but have no ambition then you'll never reach the traditional model of success (but may be happy in other ways). A huge supply of ambition but just a tiny bit of smarts will take a person so much further though.

    65. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by HyperQuantum · · Score: 1

      So at the end of the day "success" is a combination of multiple factors and IQ alone is non-determinant. So who cares about IQ anyway?

      Who cares about "success"? Happiness is much more important. It's the simple things in life that matter. The best things in life are free. You don't need a high IQ to be happy.

      --
      I am not really here right now.
    66. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Moreover, you have to figure out what the CEOs are trying to do before judging their success. Some CEOs are trying to help their company in the long run. Some are interested in maxing the value of their options and parachuting out.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    67. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall the Mensa tests from back in the 80s - tricky as the back as a box of cereal - their purpose is to identify a subset of people as a market for their product - being a member.

      Doh...

    68. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THATSRACIST.gif

    69. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. In my environment *every* person with a very high manager job (CEO or a little under that) are totally insane.
      They got where they are because of the following factors :

      - they have absolutely no idea what they are doing or talking about
      - because of this they don't understand that they have no clue, and are genuinely certain they are very smart and innovative. That allow them to be very sure of themselves, everything is to easy to them
      - when a situation happens that proves them they're not that smart, they have a very elaborate denial mechanism in place which will get them to ignore the situation. They don't fake this, they appear to genuinely don't see where things went bad because their mind denies the possibility. That's why they are insane.
      - they have quite an aptitude to speak in front of crowds, make sales pitches for big clients and sound smart.
      - they are generally highly motivated and most of them know how to motivate people

    70. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This is where you learn to write automation code so that you are doing lots of work even when you're reading Slashdot. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    71. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think of that as a waste? Maybe he's satisfied. Or do you think that enjoyment of one's life is somehow not useful?

      --
      That is all.
    72. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      ring down to earth partner, One that is warm, caring, and intelligent enough to understand love, children, family, social and job. He is, and she is, and the children are an extraordinarily happy family.

      Mensa membership was abandoned decades ago.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    73. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt my IQ drop by 10 while I read this.

    74. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Match.com is cheap and easy to join, so among women one sees mostly a) window shoppers and b) pros I predict that almost none will set the Mensa flag, and that when they look at men's profiles, it will at best be ignored and at worst will count against a guy. The primary gating factor is always going to be height.

    75. Re: But people forget what MENSA concluded by etrange · · Score: 1

      I'm smart enough to want wisdom in making my way through life , more than simple mental horsepower! My fathers IQ was in the 180s ,mine 150s to 160s He worked for NASA was driven and Disciplined and very focused unlike me I am not disciplined nor very focused Which I frequently blame on being dyslexic! I like to believe that if I could actually spell my way out of a wet paper bag I perhaps would've scored higher!

    76. Re: But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G... The last sentence in the first paragraph my help you overcome your attempt at being pedantic.

    77. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So very, very true for me too...sigh...

    78. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar story, but two years in the US Army fixed all that.

    79. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CEOs are 'stupid'? How many do you know? How would you handle management of a BoD, a dozen very smart C level underlings, and a few thousand employees, many of whom have your level of social and communication skills.

      I know several CEOs. They are about the smartest people I know. You? There are a tens of thousands of people who can hack ECMs, probably another million Russian or Chinese teens that could figure it out with one hour of Internet time. OK, you are 'smart', but not 'bragging rights' smart.

      You are correct about one thing, most GM engineers could not do what you do. Which is why I own a German car.

    80. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

      CEO's are stupid as boxes of rocks, but they can sell themselves and talk others into doing things and convince people they know what they are doing.

      The way I think of it is: There are several different kinds of intelligence. IQ tests cover things like pattern recognition because they want to be language-independent and objective. There are other kinds of intelligence like social intelligence -- understanding, inspiring, and motivating people. And intelligence coming up with big new ideas, and so on. The standard IQ tests have blind spots in these areas.

      I've worked a lot with CEOs in my 25+ year career, and by and large they are impressive people. And I don't mean in the con-man way you seem to feel. They understand how to read people and motivate action. I'm reminded of the anecdote where an engineer at Apple was responsible for developing a laptop power supply, a classic "boring" task, when Steve Jobs randomly popped by his desk and asked what he was working on. In the course of a 5 minute conversation with Steve he came away feeling he had the most important job at the company. There's a type of intelligence there that IQ doesn't capture, and it isn't pure bullshit.

    81. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smartest guy I know wastes most of every day playing Xbox and smoking pot.

      why does he not take your advice and contribute to society?

      maybe it's because society isn't worth it.

    82. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand the job of a senior leader. Their job isn't to have all the answers and be right all the time. It's to steer the organization to success. It's not so different from being a military commander, or the coach of a football team. Some things will go wrong as a result of the calls you make. If you dwell on those failures and second-guess yourself in front of your people, it only serves to harm your team's ability to succeed.

      When you're a football coach and your team is down at halftime, what's your locker room speech? "I'm sorry guys I really fucked up a couple of those calls. I guess I have a lot to learn. But our stats guy says there's still an 11% chance we might win, so we might pull out a miracle!" When you act without confidence, it makes your team lack confidence in themselves and that's halfway to defeat.

      My experience with senior leaders is they always feel doubt inside. They're just good at hiding it because they know it isn't productive.

    83. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

      The carrot of salary and the stick of unemployment are what's getting many people to accomplish a single goal.

      Not sure if troll. Employment and wages are just the start of personal motivation. Those will only cause a person to show up. Did the soldiers who stormed the beaches at Normandy do it because of their paychecks? Do the players in the World Cup only try hard because they think it might lead to lucrative endorsement deals? I know an awful lot of people here in silicon valley who could easily retire, but they keep working because they have dreams and feel their work is meaningful.

    84. Re: But people forget what MENSA concluded by daviskw · · Score: 1

      You have odd ideas ocean CEO's. I won't argue that there are a few idiots who some how smoozed their way to the top. However, if you stop to look at
      The the bios of startups and take a look at the CEOs of most of those companies you will find that for the most part these positions are filled by scary smart people who are smart technically as well as emotionally. These people are often the single point of success or failure of any company.

      Being a genius, you probably already new that and you were saying something stupid just for the argument.

      --
      Beware the wood elf!!!
    85. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my ignorance got the best of me, as I really don't know much about Michaelangelo's personal life. Are you saying that he gained significant wealth through his painting and sculpting? I was under the impression that artists of that era sought commissions from wealthy patrons simply as a means of supporting themselves. If Michaelangelo died wealthy, I'll have learned something new today.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    86. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      I became a developer because I thought it would be great to have someone pay me to do something I love doing.

      I do see development as an enjoyable puzzle to solve, but I still made the wrong career choice, even though I kick ass at it.

      If you love painting, the last job you want to get is as a painter. Because you won't be painting Mona Lisas, you'll be painting walls.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    87. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Employment and wages are just the start of personal motivation. Those will only cause a person to show up.

      Indeed, this is precisely how I would describe most workers I encounter in daily life. Motivated just enough to show up. If you think the average middle manager is anything like a soldier storming the beaches at Normandy or a World Cup player, you're deluding yourself.

      I know an awful lot of people here in silicon valley who could easily retire, but they keep working because they have dreams and feel their work is meaningful.

      Maybe I'm just a cynic, but perhaps they keep working because they're fully committed to the rat race, keeping up with the Joneses, and/or getting a high score in the game of life (i.e. dying rich). It doesn't help that society praises work as inherently valuable and looks down on people who take breaks, vacation, or retire.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    88. Re:But people forget what MENSA concluded by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about whether he was wealthy or not.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  48. What is the Attrition Rate at Mensa? by retroworks · · Score: 1

    Mensa members appear to treat IQ as a fixed point, like an SAT test score or GPA that stays in your recordbook forever. But people obviously slow down over time, or suffer psychological symptoms such as paranoia or obsession which may have a deleterious effect on IQ. Some think the act of joining Mensa itself is a contraindicator of highest intelligence (perhaps why they had to dip to 98th percentile, the top thought better of enlisting).

    What dating sites actually need is not more dating sites, but a Kayak,com service where I can find dates simultaneously from MENSA, Match.com, EHarmony, FarmersOnly.com, AdultFriendFinder, ChristianSingles, AshleyMadison, HinduConnections, etc., with search-by boxes for attractiveness, income, and other values-based searches. Oh wait, i think the NSA has that already, maybe we can lower the national debt by making it a paid search service.

    --
    Gently reply
  49. 60 IQ is indeed a carrot by jbssm · · Score: 1

    The IQ scale has its median at 100 by definition. As such, someone with an IQ of 60 is indeed retarded.

  50. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put up some fake profiles, get those weirdos somewhere and humiliate them. Just think about it: smug smart-boy goes out thinking he's on a date with a hot chick and instead is forced to eat the contents of a port-a-potty and to go home without pants and underwear! Serves them right!

  51. Geniuses??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the correlation != causation meme.

    To be frank, during the time I was at Mensa I met all sorts of people and had some interesting conversations. They where basically just a bunch of regular people; a cross-section of normal society. Unfortunately there were also some that seemed to have a huge chip on their shoulder among the line of "I'm smarter than you, if not, prove it". Basically lacking insight into social interactions between people in society and it's relative importance, so I did have my doubts about their so-called intelligence. Mostly they were of the "assholier than though" religious persuasion (Oh, wait, there's a lot of atheists on /. too....)

    Anyhow, I do not think that with an IQ around 145 (give or take) I'm that smart, and have a lot of non-Mensa friends who are sometimes very insightful and interesting to converse with. In the end I let my membership lapse as my own social circle served my basic human need for social interaction better, and I could be more selective as to whom I want to be friends with and why (may sound selfish, be it as it may).

    If you ever meet someone who thinks they are smarter than normal people, ask him (her) "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?" I haven't met anyone at Mensa who really did something extraordinary with their lives. They are just run-of-the-mill people with average jobs. They may have some peculiar or even interesting interests, some may have a much deeper understanding of certain aspects and see more connections between information, but they are all normal people. I shouldn't speak for others, but sometimes I think the price to attain fame and fortune is simply too high - I do not want to sacrifice so much time, energy, health, focus, and social interaction on one single goal that will in all probably not live much longer than me.

    1. Re:Geniuses??? by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"

      Because I'm a lazy-ass bastard, and not driven enough to sell something to someone (including myself) ;-)

      The way I see it, there are Intelligent people that just like to hang out with other intelligent people now and then and have an interesting conversation. The same way that athletic people like to hang out with other athletic people now and then and do some sports together.

      In both groups there are assholes that get a kick out of putting not as smart or not as athletic people down so they can feel superior. But thankfully, they are not the norm.

  52. Mensa is for those who need reassurance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have met a number of Mensa members.

    Good lord, what an insufferable bunch of insecure
    douche bags they are. They all want to _make sure_
    you know how "smart" they are.

    Females are enough of a pain in the ass to deal with
    just to get laid, without adding Mensa bullshit to the situation.

    And then there is the very real specter of two geniuses breeding
    and having children who are profoundly autistic. It seems nature
    finds geniuses annoying too.

  53. Dating site for white people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all this is: find an inherited / cultural characteristic, and allow prejudiced people to start with an initial filter which fits with their prejudices.

    Yeah, there's correlation between IQ and social prestige. There's also a correlation between wealth of mom&dad, whiteness, maleness and prestige.

  54. Yep, they are certifiable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems reasonable for the web site to do this.

    The lead in statistics seem questionable.
    98th percentile means top 2% which equates 1 in 50.
    But I don't see how that's 1 in 50 Americans.
    Some days it seems more like 1 in 1000, especially inside the beltway.
    Maybe all the smart folks are concentrated somewhere else?

  55. Mensan here by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

    I thought I was special until I realised there are 140 000 000 potential mensans on earth.
    And the fact that I'm pretty good at guessing which dice should come after a serie of 4 other dice doesn't tell much about myself, and surely shouldn't be taken as a genius indicator.
    Anyway, I went to two Mensa meetings : I met some assholes and some nice guys, just like I would at the pub across the street.

    1. Re:Mensan here by clam666 · · Score: 1

      I thought I was special until I realised there are 140 000 000 potential mensans on earth.

      ...and most of them are from China and India.

      And the fact that I'm pretty good at guessing which dice should come after a serie of 4 other dice doesn't tell much about myself, and surely shouldn't be taken as a genius indicator.

      You should use a Hidden Markov model. It'll free up your time.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
  56. Mensa? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK Mensa is a club for people whose only common interest is their ability to score highly in IQ tests? I remember being very impressed when I was a teenager, but I think the consensus has moved on a bit from the idea that intelligence, not to mention broader abillity, can be described well with just one number. And of course, one so often comes across people who have scored something mile high and still seem surpisingly limited in their abilities in life.

    Taking intelligence tests is something that can be learned - it's not even that hard, once you learn the tricks. I have several times scored over 150; so am I genius? Well, you tell me :-) It's a bit like bodybuilding - it looks very impressive, but all those hard pumped muscles are just for show, they don't actually have much practical value.

  57. I.Q. is a flawed system of measurement. by stewsters · · Score: 2

    People who boast about their I.Q. are losers. - Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:I.Q. is a flawed system of measurement. by clam666 · · Score: 1

      People who boast about their I.Q. are losers. - Stephen Hawking

      Said the man who is too stupid to operate a stairwell.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
  58. Match dot com is a scam by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 1

    I tried that shit once, all I got was bots and men pretending to be women.

    --
    Buck Feta. You know what to do.
  59. What is success? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Define 'success'.

    1. Re:What is success? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Ability to define success.

  60. Best post in the thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best post in the thread. Thanks.

    Do something with your life, people.

    Screw IQ, looks, and social circle size.

    Play from the effin heart!!!!

  61. We are 98% by loox · · Score: 1

    If Mensans are so smart, why do they need a dating service?

  62. High IQ is largely an accident of birth by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 2

    Right you are!

    If you're smart, it's mostly because you're lucky. You got the good genes. Then, you probably had a good upbringing and environment. Neither of which is anything else than luck.

    Sure, to maximize your smarts, you have to work. But lots of people work hard.

    So what makes high IQ people special, really? Luck.

    What kind of asshole gets all hoity-toity because he was, mostly, lucky?

    --PeterM

    1. Re:High IQ is largely an accident of birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what makes high IQ people special, really? Luck.

      More than likely, it also probably means that they were having a really good day when they took the test. Just sayin'

      --PDG

    2. Re:High IQ is largely an accident of birth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of asshole gets all hoity-toity because he was, mostly, lucky?

      --PeterM

      You should really think about how your posts will look when you end a post with a question and just append an auto sig, ya hoity-toity asshole :D

    3. Re:High IQ is largely an accident of birth by avandesande · · Score: 1

      No it's not. My parents were intelligent and were discriminating when they picked a partner. How is that an accident?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  63. If I'm so clever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a young lad it turns out I was quite bright. A lot of the academic stuff that people thought I should be working at I found pretty boring (having undiagnosed adhd might have had something to do with that).

    I did, however, notice that my social skills were lacking compared to my peers, so I set about balancing my personae up a bit so that I wasn't all brain. The weird thing is, even though everyone in my family thought I was super intelligent, they felt they could tell me I was being stupid when I didn't simply do what they told me to do with my life, no matter that I could demonstrate that I had thought my actions through fairly carefully and had a reasonable rationale (to my mind at least).

    It took me a long time (longer than it should have I admit) to finally work out that my family were just arseholes. :)

  64. Dating should be about genetic heath by Andover+Chick · · Score: 1

    For good genetic health, dating sites should be matching people who are DIFFERENT, not the same. Given a large number of geniuses who suffer from Aspergers or other forms of autism, it probably best not to be dating others of the same malady. Instead, it is better to date a person with different traits. Of course geniuses don't feel they can communicate with normal people, which is common amongst people who struggle with autism. But worry less about compatibility and more about what sort of scary genetics you might be passing to your children. So if you're a Mexican academic genius then marry a Chinese athlete. If you're an African athlete then marry an Eskimo artist. If you're a short Jewish businessman then marry a tall blonde Scandinavia.

    1. Re:Dating should be about genetic heath by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there, you short Jewish businessman. The username is just the cherry on top of the deception!

    2. Re:Dating should be about genetic heath by Andover+Chick · · Score: 1

      Ha, ha... You did pickup what I was hinting at, but I am actually the tall blonde woman. I used to live in Manhattan (NY) where I noticed so many short Jewish businessmen, and wealthy Jewish celebrities, were married to tall blondes. I thought to myself what healthy genetic diversity it is. Especially in the Jewish population where there was too much close breeding, mostly due to anti-semitism, resulted in all sorts of genetic nastiness such as Tay-sachs, sickle cell anemia, turrets syndrome, etc...

  65. I thought there were already numerous sites. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought there were already numerous sites dedicated to masturbation.

  66. And let's not forget what IQ tests were for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IQ tests were for finding children who would have problems later on in school. And by finding them, extra attention could be given to them so that they were likely to be successful.

    Years later, the US Army (wrongly) turned it into a measuring stick.

    A wonderful book is The Mismeasure of Man by Stephen Jay Gould.

    Anyway, having a high IQ is just the luck of the sperm draw. What folks should be proud of is the character that they develop - like being humble when one is lucky enough to have had the genes to be intelectually talented.

    1. Re:And let's not forget what IQ tests were for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should read 'The Bell Curve' by Richard J. Herrnstein andCharles Murray. They show that IQ strongly determines life outcomes.

      What most people do not realize is that life is an IQ test.If you can solve problems faster then the next guy you tend to do better.

  67. Obligatory Douglas Adams Quote by Ignatius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > I know a lot of high IQ people and they all have one thing in common. Being lazy. Smartest guy I know wastes most of every day playing Xbox and smoking pot.

    âoeFor instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so muchâ"the wheel, New York, wars and so onâ"whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than manâ"for precisely the same reasons.â

    â Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

  68. But what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Match.com is paying Mensa for the privilege? I'd consider this a smart move: Mensa takes their money for basically no commitment. It's not like they can or will force their members to subscribe - and what's another spam email?

  69. humorously... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Mensa isn't even all that selective in the grand scheme of things. They admit anyone who scores +2 sigma or higher on a variety of tests, not all of which measure IQ very well. So we're talking about the top 2.2% of all individuals. In terms of the pre-1995 SAT that would be 1250 and higher.

  70. I was a member once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't renew because the monthly lunches were held at two local restaurants that definitely qualify as "mundane." One was hip 25 years ago, and the other is Golden Corral. No thanks!

  71. That's why I left mensa by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... In short, you don't always join Mensa because you think you're smart. You join to be set apart from most people, who are, as one member put it: "mundane."...

    That's not why you join mensa, that why you continue to be a member after you join.

    .
    When I attended the mensa meetings, the condescending attitude of mensa people towards others was quite a surprise to me. After a few meetings I just stopped attending and did not renew my membership.

  72. Put all Mensa members on a boat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and sink the boat. This site will help us easily list who they are.

  73. if there's a checkbox for IMMENSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there's a checkbox for immensa, it doesn't stand for I'm more than Mensa

  74. An oxymoron, for sure ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Smart people signing up for a dating sight is like engineers outfitted with radiometers curiously examining the interior of a nuclear reactor.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:An oxymoron, for sure ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart people signing up for a dating sight is like engineers outfitted with radiometers curiously examining the interior of a nuclear reactor.

      It's more like an illiterate gibbon trying to appear erudite on an interweb.

  75. What if I don't want to date women smart as me? by hey! · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm looking for a woman who is better looking than me and who'll accept the IQ differential in exchange.

    </sarcasm>

    True story. I took a long bike ride last summer and ended up in a very affluent seaside community. I cross over the causeway to an island that's the most desirable neighborhood. I pass an attractive blonde woman jogging, but I think nothing of it. Then I pass another one. Then another. And another. I notice the women getting in and out of the Land Rovers in front of the Islands quaint shops. They're obviously blonde joggers too. It's like all the women came from the same Jogging Blonde Lady factory then were rigged out with different accessories. None of them look over 30.

    So I start looking for men. They're obviously wealthy, but they appear on average 20 years older than the women. In fact, they're just regular, dumpy old shlumps with expensive cars and watches.

    It was weird, like having a young, blonde, athletic wife was part of the homeowners' covenant or something. Sorry honey, but we just got a citation from the association and you'll have to move of the island. Heather here will be taking over your duties; be a dear and show her around the old place.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  76. The second test by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    After joining Mensa, you get invited to plenty of card games, speeches and nerd discussions. But you're still dealing with the general public.

    Now, if there was a second test... where then only let in people that care about their appearance, maintain good eye contact, have a modicum of physical fitness, then I would definitely like to join that inner circle.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    1. Re:The second test by X10 · · Score: 1

      People who pass the second test are the people who don't join Mensa in the first place. People join Mensa because they don't have friends. This is because they fail your second test.

      --
      no, I don't have a sig
  77. don't tell people you are in mensa by schlachter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whenever someone tells me they are in Mensa, I usually think, what a fuck head. Not only did you care enough to jump through the hoops to join, but you are arrogant enough to want everyone to know you're a member.

    Instead, show me your intellect with witty conversation, keen understanding, and curiosity, and you won't be such an ass.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:don't tell people you are in mensa by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Instead, show me your intellect with witty conversation, keen understanding, and curiosity, and you won't be such an ass.

      Instead, show me your intellect by agreeing with me, and you won't be such an ass.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:don't tell people you are in mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of Mensa: don't talk about Mensa.

    3. Re:don't tell people you are in mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of Mensa: don't talk about Mensa.

      Well, considering how much we have all heard about this organization I guess someone already broke that rule, didn't they?

    4. Re:don't tell people you are in mensa by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Whenever someone tells me they are in Mensa, I usually think, what a fuck head.

      The first sign of intelligence is making immediate conclusions based on no relevant observations.

      Not only did you care enough to jump through the hoops to join, but you are arrogant enough to want everyone to know you're a member.

      I just submitted my GRE. I think I had to use the post office at some point.

      In my case, I stuck a "Federal Bikini Inspector" card on the back of my Mensa card. It's more amusing that way and decreases the punching.

      Instead, show me your intellect with witty conversation, keen understanding, and curiosity, and you won't be such an ass.

      Have you considered buying a television?

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    5. Re:don't tell people you are in mensa by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I've gotten to know three people I know joined Mensa. One is smart, productive, and has made a name for himself in a fairly specialized field. Two were some of the most clueless people I've ever met.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  78. ...nein nein nein nein nein nein by tepples · · Score: 1

    Especially when it's funnier to stop after the Feynman point where you start sounding like either Herman Cain or Adolf Hitler.

  79. Anecdotal story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad was a member back in the 80s. In large part because he liked any excuse to talk about books and puzzles and whatnot. Seemed like a good place to go. One year when a Mensa convention came to town, he went to attend and was allowed to bring a guest. My mom went and she, as a gag, wore a button that read "Non-member, please speak slowly and use small words."

    Not a single person laughed or got the joke, hey mom was no mental slouch either, and everyone that talked to them would talk normally to my dad and slowly to my mom. It was at that point he decided maybe membership wasn't for him.

  80. Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a physicist. Been one for twenty years or so.

    I've yet to meet anyone who admits to being in MENSA.

    If people are interested in ideas (physics, philosophy, whatever) they join societies or clubs or professions interested in those ideas.

  81. love is irrational and a waste of time by fran6gagne · · Score: 1

    Why would such highly intelligent people would let "love", an highly irrational feeling, waste their precious existence time. Aren't they way too busy finding a cure for cancer or making nuclear fusion works?

  82. Socially disabled? by X10 · · Score: 1

    Why does a community of socially disabled people need a dating site? Do they think it will help them?

    I know plenty of people who would qualify for Mensa (I know I do) but they don't join because they have a happy social life with lots of smart friends, and even "normal" people. It's only the "smart" people who are more or less socially disabled who need to join Mensa in order to "get a life". Get a life!

    --
    no, I don't have a sig
  83. Inteligent but not smart by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    The male members, which I'm sure is going to be pretty well represented at Mensa, is far better off joining a local yoga club if they want a chance at love ^.^ The females just need to go to a bar.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  84. No thanks by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    MENSA is for people who are insecure and conceited about their intelligence. An analogy I always use is the Club of Certified Badasses. What kind of badass would want to join that?

    I hear they're pretty big on scientific racism too...they can have fun with that without me.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:No thanks by clam666 · · Score: 1

      MENSA is for people who are insecure and conceited about their intelligence. An analogy I always use is the Club of Certified Badasses. What kind of badass would want to join that?

      I hear they're pretty big on scientific racism too...they can have fun with that without me.

      Wth is scientific racism? Do they refuse to research black body energy or something?

      So it's a group of insecure people who are conceited, and you spend some amount of your waking hours constructing analogies for them.

      And FYI? Chuck Norris is a certified bad-ass. That's who.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    2. Re:No thanks by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Coulda Googled it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      I think I spent about 20 seconds coming up with that analogy, probably less time than it takes to order a MENSA entry test form.

      Chuck Norris actually isn't a certified badass, that's a common misconception. He's the authority on badass who can certify others.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  85. This is probably for the better by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

    A bunch of jerks eliminating themselves from the common pool.

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
  86. Formula for success ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... in a relationship: Two Aspie know-it-alls living together.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  87. Box of Rocks Smart by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

    I knew a guy who was mensa... and I can tell you for a fact he was dumb as a box of rocks. Either he cheated or they gave him a free one.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    1. Re:Box of Rocks Smart by azav · · Score: 1

      Some are SO FOCUSED in one area and completely ignorant of learning anything outside of their own specialty.

      This causes problems, because they expect that they will become an expert in areas outside their core, and actually make stupid and paranoid decisions.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  88. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a high IQ score doesn't help us getting laid.

  89. idiot club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I've seen Mensa members are just idiots who are like taking certain kinds of tests, read pseudo intellectual articles in their magazine, work useless little puzzles and manage to accomplish zilch.

    My favorite part of Mensa is their investment club biggest joke ever.

    Really intelligent people have intelligent pastimes that attract other intelligent people; they don't need a club dedicated to helping them find intelligent people.

  90. Mensa idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another Mensa idiot.

    Prohibition was a Progressive, Protestant idea; not a conservative idea.

    Also there are enough teetotalers for both parties.

  91. IQ of 72 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was given an IQ test, and scored a 72. While I am deaf, I usually can lipread people well enough on a one-to-one basis and follow instructions. However with the person giving the test, I couldn't understand a single word he said, he was a mumble-mouth and not very helpful in working with me to make himself understood. He'd do things like put a puzzle in front of me, and click on a stopwatch. I'd figure out what I was supposed to do with it, try out a few things until I got what he wanted me to do. So to this day I tell people my IQ is 72. Some people absolutely believe it because deaf people are dumb, others ask why I don't just take the test again. I quip that it's cheating to study to beat the test, and that if IQ tests are supposed to be accurate, how would it be immune to people taking the test over and over until they get the IQ score they want?

  92. Data point by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I went to some "young Mensan" meetings back in the 1980's. I ended up dating a very nice (and smart) girl and had a good time.

    In the 2010's, I'm not sure there is much point in joining Mensa to meet people for romantic reasons, especially given the large number of "meetup" style events available, plus online dating sites allow one to signal intelligence pretty easily if not explicitly.

    There are many signals that people look for in romantic engagements that people prefer to not receive explicitly, including money, intelligence, and power. For example, women on average may like rich men, but if you show up at a date and give a woman a $100 bill to signal your wealth, it is not likely to be received well.

  93. Inflation of the word 'genius' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually only about 20-25% of Mensa members would qualify as "Genius" (3 SD's above the mean) most are merely "gifted". And Mensa is the gateway for the real High IQ societies the ones that advertise in the Mensa journal looking for people in the top 0.01% (You know, the one Sheldon would be in if he were real...and of course Wile E Coyote SUPER GENIUS) ;-)

  94. The 98th percentile is nothing. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    The distribution of intelligence follows a normal curve, but intelligence itself follows a power law curve. It's very steep at the high end. I test around the 99.5th percentile, and I judge all my friends to be at least in the 99th, else they wouldn't be my friends. But my arrogance is tempered by knowing that within that half-percentile above me -- well over a million people in the US alone -- are many who can look down on me as I look down on the 99th percentile. They are the real gods of our society. Even at the 99.5th percentile, I will never be more than a second-tier demigod.

    1. Re:The 98th percentile is nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....I test around the 99.5th percentile, and I judge all my friends to be at least in the 99th, else they wouldn't be my friends. But my arrogance is tempered by knowing that within that half-percentile above me -- well over a million people in the US alone -- are many who can look down on me as I look down on the 99th percentile. They are the real gods of our society. Even at the 99.5th percentile, I will never be more than a second-tier demigod.

      And I'm sure all your friends feels themselves blessed that you would deign to let them stand in your presence. My diagnosis: you suffer from delusions of adequacy.

      Or maybe you forgot to set the sarcasm filter on? Did I just get "whooshed"?

    2. Re:The 98th percentile is nothing. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The distribution of intelligence follows a normal curve, but intelligence itself follows a power law curve.

      WTF? IQ scores follow a normal curve, because they're normalised.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:The 98th percentile is nothing. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      By force-fitting the distribution to a normal curve, we discover that performance follows a power law curve. So we could just start with the power law curve and use it as the basis for the distribution. Normalization is unnecessary.

    4. Re:The 98th percentile is nothing. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      Nobody's "deigning" to associate with anyone. For example, on my champion trivia team, I judge one person slightly my superior, two my equal, and two slightly my inferior. But we're all valuable contributors... and all vastly superior to anyone at the 98th percentile.

  95. Sooo, no one has actually asked? by azav · · Score: 1

    What the IQ requirement of being in Mensa actually is?

    Just for curiosity's sake, no one has actually asked this?

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Sooo, no one has actually asked? by fishybell · · Score: 1

      What the IQ requirement of being in Mensa actually is?

      It's like the price of a superyacht; if you have to ask, you can't afford it.

      --
      ><));>
  96. JFYI Mensa means "Dumb" in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is sooo funny... Seriously, it's the female tense of dumb/fool!

  97. Juice of sapho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of Sapho that thoughts acquire speed, the lips acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by will alone I set my mind in motion."

    I hope they mail you a little bottle of sapho juice when you sign up.

  98. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was single, there's no way I would date someone who only prides themselves in their intelligence. I used to think like when I was younger, and I know a lot of people that did too. There's many more forms of intelligence than just what IQ or Mensa tests measure. It doesn't show how socially, emotionally intelligent or creative the person is. it's closed minded to think of yourself as smarter or better than people because of an IQ test who might have other mental qualities that far exceed yours.

  99. I may not be Mensa material... by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    (never tested) but even I'm smart enough to know that reducing the size of my dating pool isn't a good idea.

  100. Bring on the babes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giggity

  101. Mensa is for wannabes by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

    Seriously. If there is one thing most smart people have in common, it's that they are not in Mensa.

    I went to an Ivy League college. I work in an elite university. There are two Nobel laureates on my floor. I spend my days surrounded by certifiably Very Smart People.

    I don't know a single person who belongs to Mensa. Most of the people I know would laugh at the idea of joining Mensa. They don't need to join an organization to show off how smart they are. Everyone already knows they're smart. They don't need to join an organization to find other smart people. They spend their days surrounded by smart people, because they work in fields that require intelligence.

    --
    "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  102. Mensa people have an ego much bigger than their IQ by valenco · · Score: 1

    I once dated a Mensa girl... She was as stupid as she was arrogant! and trust me she was arrogant with an IQ of 150... I'm glad I'm not that clever!!! I'm looking forward for the success of this service, the more of them date each other the more likely evolution will make sure to get rid of them. hopefully in a few generation.

  103. The real question is ... by assertation · · Score: 1

    If you are so smart why are you still single?

  104. Nerds Getting Laid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only gathered from this article nerds trying incredibly hard to get laid.

  105. Mensa...don't do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, I qualified to join Mensa. I was proud to be smart and like many, many young people who are smart, you think you are better than others or that somehow the world owes you something because you are smart. When I got older, I realized the hypocrisy we have as society regarding "natural" talent. If someone is born great looking, with a naturally athletic build, we look down on them..."Well they didn't work for it..they were just born with it". But if someone is born very smart, we don't do that at all. Somehow they are treated as if they somehow earned it. I'm not talking education here..you can be very intelligent and ignorant..and education and knowledge is earned. I'm talking about raw number crunching/puzzle solving/pattern solving smarts.

      I guess I was young enough that the whole concept of intellectual snobbery didn't dawn on me. I went to a mixer for people who could join, but hadn't yet, and met several regular members. What a fucking nightmare. I am so glad I never joined, because looking back..it's the whole need for validation part that is a real character flaw in my opinion.(See Joe Biden). Anyway, my kids are both well above average natural intelligence, but I never, ever tell them they are "smart" or smarter than most people. I tell them they are smart enough that if they work hard they can do whatever they want with their lives. I always tell them that hard work will beat being smart or natural talent 99% of the time...so focus on working harder/more efficiently than everyone else. Working in the engineering field, I see 22 year olds just out of college who are exactly like I was when I was a teenager. Very smart and think the world hasn't yet dreamed of an intellect as great as theirs and they are just so very, very special. They know because their mom's have told them that their whole lives.

    You want to join a group of like minded people? Join a builder club. Join the chamber of commerce. Join a fitness club.

  106. Re:Too many Republicans by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    There was no prohibition in the 1800s.

    And that's relevant how, exactly?

    Do you reckon the idea of prohibition just fell out of the sky one day, or it was the zenith of temperance movements that had been around since at least 600 AD.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  107. Brainiacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I joined Mensa when I was (IIRC) sixteen.

    Lasted a year before I let my membership lapse; in that year I had irrefutable proof that IQ and intelligence are NOT the same thing.

    Or, to put it more simply, I encountered some of the most stupid people I've ever encountered as a Mensa member.

  108. IQ of 145? I think you missed a decimal point. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If you ever meet someone who thinks they are smarter than normal people, ask him (her) "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"

    Bad form to answer a question with a question[1], but why do you think smart people are automatically rich? Do you also think rich people are automatically smart? Have you heard of David Beckham or Paris Hilton?

    [1] or three. Well, two and a half.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  109. Yellow = Urolagnia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Handkerchief Code: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handkerchief_code

  110. I know I am dumb, very dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since I was a kid everybody calls me a dummy

    Last year I went to a fair organized by a local community school, and found that there was an "exam" or something taking place, and upon asking it was related to Mensa (at that time I didn't know what it is)

    I asked them if I could try out the test, they told me that the test had already started 20 minutes earlier, I said I don't mind, I just want to try.

    So I paid the money and they let me took that test.

    Several weeks after that, I received a letter from them telling me that my IQ is 186, and they included an application form for Mensa.

    Should I join?

    As I said, I am dumb, very dumb. I do not know why they say that my IQ is 186. Everybody that I know calls me a dummy. Should a certified dummy like me join Mensa ?

  111. money money money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monetizing nerdy sex.

  112. XKCDs are stoopid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That XKCD has a stupid punchline, stupid compared to my expectations, I'll grant you, but it really should have been more prick-like since that it what I believe the author wanted to convey. Instead, it came out all frilly and lovey dovey like the guy really did deserve to get an award and we all just wait in pure anticipation for his next Slashdot post.

  113. Mismatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a child my IQ was tested out at 154. My wife is fat, ugly, and stupid, and I love her very much. She's wonderful. The slim, beautiful, smart lady flee off to a new boyfriend.

  114. So smart... by blagfast · · Score: 0

    ... but can't even get laid on their own!

  115. Well. by NulDevice · · Score: 1

    "Mensa Match: The Dating Site For the Insufferably Smug."

    --

    ----
    "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

  116. Dating is not a good indicative of high IQ by Optali · · Score: 0
    A really smart person should be aware of what a stupid scam all this dating stuff is. Your probabilities of getting laid or finding someone are exactly as high as just doing stuff in the traditional way (going out to places).

    And don't tell me about the social inability of "geniuses", I score 19 out of 30 in a test for autism traits and I found a partner and even married.

    What this shows is that these "mensan" aren't much more than monkeys trained to do IQ tests and score well in them.

    Note that I don't speak out of despise, I score fairly high in IQ tests (i do score in the 98 percentile of a specific test suite and in English which is not my mother tongue, so that I should have a relative handicap, but these were tests made for a professional assessment, not to join a fancy club of quizz-fans) and I am fluent in 5 languages (human not programming ones)...

    So, we have a few self proclaimed "geniuses" who don't have a fucking clue about probabilities, believe in marketing hogwash and who's geniality consists in filling in "brain training" type shit (meaning that they haven't even bothered to read any science about the subject).

    Dating for Monkeys.

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  117. Idiot savant x 2 by cybrarian_ca · · Score: 1

    All I can think about reading this is a job I had as a grad student, working in an urban planning research institute. The research director was the first woman in Canada to get a doctorate in her field; her husband had been short-listed for a Nobel prize in his (different) field. Yet on a near-daily basis, she ran to me yelling that the postage meter wasn't working again - and every time, I'd go into the mail room, look at the wall, and say "You kicked the plug out again." Her husband would call her for instructions on how to write a check. Also, one day she came to work in a lovely pink blouse that had been white weeks before; apparently, they attempted to do their own laundry, and threw a new red item in with the whites. I'm sure their IQs were off the charts, but they were astonishingly dim about how to function in daily life.