Spreed spectrum does precisely this. And 40dB or more of "coding gain" is pretty standard. You get that with GPS signals even. There is however the old fasion trade offs that all radar must make. Higher coding gain, and more spectrum usage, required longer decode delay times. Wide band directorial antennas are harder to make and can have bizarre side-lobes, doppler effects make decoding searches more difficult. etc.
Spacial distribution of said noise or source will generally be higher than background. Sure harder to find. But also none of this is new. We have been using these methods for decades. I don't really see what is new here. Also range for radar is a problem with low power, and even spreed spectrum has its limits.
No it really isn't like that at all. I mean that shit happens all the time in the wild without "human intervention". So if killing one orca or lion would screw the ecosystem. It would already be totally fucked up.
Ecosystems are not as fragile as you believe. Or there wouldn't be any around at all. Including us.
Private verse not so private. A private viewing is not private when you charge. A private poker game is not so private when you charge. Seriously this doesn't need a fucking car analogy.
They really don't. I have some papers with bigger groups in those journals, i have even peer reviewed for them twice. They really don't even care about the science. They care about "impact factor" and that means science with sex appeal and even sometimes fairly shit stuff because it gets cited a lot. Even when all those citations are pointing what shit that paper was, it still looks good for impact factors.
I too like to ride. But that is a terrible reason not to have driver-less cars. There are still tracks and here in NZ racing in fairly cheap with the slower classes not even requiring role cages. Also you get to go much faster with less chance of getting killed or killing someone.
But i don't get how a driver less bike works. Don't we lean the bike in turns? how does that work if i am not actively participating in the ride?
You forgetting the all important Zombie Apocalypse Readiness Factor (ZARF). Solar is a big bonus in ZARF! With solar and a moat, you get a ZARF of at least 2 depending on your drawbridge design.
So a quick BOTE calculation, for an *average* of 1GW in the most optimal places in the world, you need about 36km2. This is very optimistic and doesn't include self shadowing etc, so realistic figures would be closer to 40km2 or more. This is smaller that a square 7km on each side. So well with the realms of plausible. However it is only 1 GW average, and we have the problem of the cost. No one is going to pay $2 kWh for power at the station. Well i don't think they will.
Solar figures lie right out of the gate. With statements like X GW of installed capacity. Yet it may not even produce that much power on a cloudless day in the middle of summer at local solar peak. It is really totally meaningless since i can install that GW of capacity in many different places and get very different expect MWh per year. Even in the most optimal sites the average power is less that 25% of the stated capacity assuming that is true peak capacity.
last year i reviewed over 30 papers. I had 6 in one week at one point. What pisses me off is that it is not reciprocated with my papers with some shockling bad reviews. One even scooped me after continusly rejecting a paper for over a year.
No its not. Some of the worst science published is in Nature and Science. These are consider the "good journals". Yet they simply are not good journals by any resonable metric of retracted studies, bullshit and otherwise just bad science that is peddled up and sold on a good story.
Peer review is not great. but it does filter 99% of the bullshit. And that matters. Already i can't keep up, while if i needed to read every nut jobs free energy theory every week it would be impossible. Even after peer review there is a lot of shit, but that is a nice big gain to S/N ratio.
It is quite easy to comply with the technical side of data availability will the form of that data makes replication of the results nearly impossible. this may not even be deliberate, as often you have a lot of your own scripts and things are glued together with a bunch of bash one liners.
For home games of poker in at least 2 different EU countries. It is perfectly legal as long as the host charges ZERO. So same thing. If there a rake or house cut, then your just become an illegal poker game. Incidentally we had the cops show up in Austria. They didn't care as long as we were quiet.
Yes and no. It is often way over compresses and often re sized, ripped from R5 regions or worse. I would gladly pay quite a bit for a good online movie service. But the fact is even netflix listings are crap here (NZ). Quality of even digital TV is very poor, and i can't see 4k being worth it as most services don't even keep up with 1080p.
In the end i am just years behind current releases. I use to go to the movies 1 a week, but now there really is nothing much i want to see, so only about 2-6 times a year these days
If they could provide it in 4k, i expect they wouldn't have a problem with plenty of people wanting to pay. After all what does a home cinema system cost? and well $50 is not exactly much of a night out at anyrate. Stay home with the girl friend and a few beers? Why the hell not.
Well i didn't use real money. But in eve i lost 6 carriers 4 dreads and a bunch of very shiny internet space ships. All up about 2000USD worth *if i used real money*. And well many people really do. I though it was strange at first. But then well if that is their hobby, why not. You will spend more on shiny golf clubs if you play golf. I paid far more for a mill and a lathe just for my rocket hobby. And well yea those expensive golf clubs are no more useful really than an internet space ship or a internet knife.
Slashdot Mirror
Spreed spectrum does precisely this. And 40dB or more of "coding gain" is pretty standard. You get that with GPS signals even. There is however the old fasion trade offs that all radar must make. Higher coding gain, and more spectrum usage, required longer decode delay times. Wide band directorial antennas are harder to make and can have bizarre side-lobes, doppler effects make decoding searches more difficult. etc.
Spacial distribution of said noise or source will generally be higher than background. Sure harder to find. But also none of this is new. We have been using these methods for decades. I don't really see what is new here. Also range for radar is a problem with low power, and even spreed spectrum has its limits.
Who cares, blow it all up and let god sort it out.. that is the US military doctrine right?
No it really isn't like that at all. I mean that shit happens all the time in the wild without "human intervention". So if killing one orca or lion would screw the ecosystem. It would already be totally fucked up.
Ecosystems are not as fragile as you believe. Or there wouldn't be any around at all. Including us.
Private verse not so private. A private viewing is not private when you charge. A private poker game is not so private when you charge. Seriously this doesn't need a fucking car analogy.
They really don't. I have some papers with bigger groups in those journals, i have even peer reviewed for them twice. They really don't even care about the science. They care about "impact factor" and that means science with sex appeal and even sometimes fairly shit stuff because it gets cited a lot. Even when all those citations are pointing what shit that paper was, it still looks good for impact factors.
Apparently you are that retarded, using user id as a credential. Is that you mdsolar? It is isn't it.
I too like to ride. But that is a terrible reason not to have driver-less cars. There are still tracks and here in NZ racing in fairly cheap with the slower classes not even requiring role cages. Also you get to go much faster with less chance of getting killed or killing someone.
But i don't get how a driver less bike works. Don't we lean the bike in turns? how does that work if i am not actively participating in the ride?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... skip to about 1:35
I know 300B sounds like a lot. But for an economy the size of the US it isn't that much really.
You forgetting the all important Zombie Apocalypse Readiness Factor (ZARF). Solar is a big bonus in ZARF! With solar and a moat, you get a ZARF of at least 2 depending on your drawbridge design.
So a quick BOTE calculation, for an *average* of 1GW in the most optimal places in the world, you need about 36km2. This is very optimistic and doesn't include self shadowing etc, so realistic figures would be closer to 40km2 or more. This is smaller that a square 7km on each side. So well with the realms of plausible. However it is only 1 GW average, and we have the problem of the cost. No one is going to pay $2 kWh for power at the station. Well i don't think they will.
Solar figures lie right out of the gate. With statements like X GW of installed capacity. Yet it may not even produce that much power on a cloudless day in the middle of summer at local solar peak. It is really totally meaningless since i can install that GW of capacity in many different places and get very different expect MWh per year. Even in the most optimal sites the average power is less that 25% of the stated capacity assuming that is true peak capacity.
last year i reviewed over 30 papers. I had 6 in one week at one point. What pisses me off is that it is not reciprocated with my papers with some shockling bad reviews. One even scooped me after continusly rejecting a paper for over a year.
No its not. Some of the worst science published is in Nature and Science. These are consider the "good journals". Yet they simply are not good journals by any resonable metric of retracted studies, bullshit and otherwise just bad science that is peddled up and sold on a good story.
Scientists are their own worst enemy.
Peer review is not great. but it does filter 99% of the bullshit. And that matters. Already i can't keep up, while if i needed to read every nut jobs free energy theory every week it would be impossible. Even after peer review there is a lot of shit, but that is a nice big gain to S/N ratio.
It is quite easy to comply with the technical side of data availability will the form of that data makes replication of the results nearly impossible. this may not even be deliberate, as often you have a lot of your own scripts and things are glued together with a bunch of bash one liners.
your giving way too much credit to the pirates.
Yea but Hollywood is to stupid to use it, and 99.9% of pirate to dumb to remove basic meta headers anyway. They even advertise who they are!
For home games of poker in at least 2 different EU countries. It is perfectly legal as long as the host charges ZERO. So same thing. If there a rake or house cut, then your just become an illegal poker game. Incidentally we had the cops show up in Austria. They didn't care as long as we were quiet.
Yes and no. It is often way over compresses and often re sized, ripped from R5 regions or worse. I would gladly pay quite a bit for a good online movie service. But the fact is even netflix listings are crap here (NZ). Quality of even digital TV is very poor, and i can't see 4k being worth it as most services don't even keep up with 1080p.
In the end i am just years behind current releases. I use to go to the movies 1 a week, but now there really is nothing much i want to see, so only about 2-6 times a year these days
What the fuck are you smoking?
If they could provide it in 4k, i expect they wouldn't have a problem with plenty of people wanting to pay. After all what does a home cinema system cost? and well $50 is not exactly much of a night out at anyrate. Stay home with the girl friend and a few beers? Why the hell not.
Well i didn't use real money. But in eve i lost 6 carriers 4 dreads and a bunch of very shiny internet space ships. All up about 2000USD worth *if i used real money*. And well many people really do. I though it was strange at first. But then well if that is their hobby, why not. You will spend more on shiny golf clubs if you play golf. I paid far more for a mill and a lathe just for my rocket hobby. And well yea those expensive golf clubs are no more useful really than an internet space ship or a internet knife.
I am sick of his self voted shit articles every 10 fucking mins. If its mdsolar it's shit.