Slashdot Mirror


User: delt0r

delt0r's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,948
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,948

  1. Re:radiation was detected on Radiation From Fukushima Disaster Reaches Oregon Coast (nypost.com) · · Score: 1

    less than one banana!

  2. Re:Welcome to the Trump future... on US Life Expectancy Declines For the First Time Since 1993 (washingtonpost.com) · · Score: 1

    But, you can't have poor people dying because they can't afford healthcare... and an individual cannot really negotiate with a large corporation - especially when the price for turning down their offer is to die.

    In fact from many americains i know. And how the bulk seem to vote and act. It seams the attitude is "fuck the poor, let em die". Even from some of the poor!

  3. Re:FUD? Did anyone read the Articles? on Magic Leap Used Fake Tech Demos and Is 'Years' Behind Schedule (ibtimes.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    If only this was the first post.

  4. Re:Theory without any empirical data to back it up on Engineers Explain Why the Galaxy Note 7 Caught Fire (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 1

    the TFA says "engineers" so it must be true.

  5. Re:I.e. Samsung acted recklessly for profit on Engineers Explain Why the Galaxy Note 7 Caught Fire (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 1

    Only in America. The lawyers are laughing all the way to bank.

  6. Re:CnC makes more sense right now on Why MakerBot Didn't Kickstart A 3D Printing Revolution (backchannel.com) · · Score: 1

    and cost $10000 for a cheap one and need to be bolted to the floor. Have flood coolant and generally should only be a workshop.

  7. Re:not cost on Why MakerBot Didn't Kickstart A 3D Printing Revolution (backchannel.com) · · Score: 1

    most of the public don't want to make or fix anything either. Right tool for the job. It is not like printing where everyone has a use, even a need for it. While even printing a spare "part" when they wouldn't even buy and install said part is just not something most want to do.

  8. Re:Kind of obvious... on Why MakerBot Didn't Kickstart A 3D Printing Revolution (backchannel.com) · · Score: 1

    And lets be honest. If you really want to do CNC in anything but Al. Coolant is mandatory, even with Al for a nice finish.

  9. Re:Where's my Von Neumann printer? on Why MakerBot Didn't Kickstart A 3D Printing Revolution (backchannel.com) · · Score: 1

    3d printers have already been around for 30 years. thing is that you *can't* print anything and such a claim was and will be bullshit for the foreseeable future.

  10. Re:Thanks for catching up!! on The US Government is Finally Telling People that Homeopathy is a Sham (vox.com) · · Score: 1

    This is a true documentary of struggling doctors!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  11. Re:Thanks for catching up!! on The US Government is Finally Telling People that Homeopathy is a Sham (vox.com) · · Score: 1

    Asking for a citation is never trolling. Backing up your claims/sources is about as fundamental as it gets for a properly tuned internet Hinky Meter.

  12. Re:Not Verified At All on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Guess how many experiments are wrong if this is right? 10 of THOUSANDS. So who do you think is most likely to have made a mistake? The millions of others, or these 6 dudes. You can solve Maxwell equations fairly easily, you don't get any force. I have read the paper, They don't have a control. You want people to believe an extraordinary result. Have some extraordinary proof. Hell the original paper had math errors everywhere. As was shown by others.

    In God we trust. The rest of you show me the data. And they don't have any data. And all the wishful thinking in the world won't change the physics.

    And yet you claim to be open minded while still not having actually read it. Or the basic physics. that is not open minded. That is willfully ignorant.

  13. Re:Not Verified At All on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Yep, its called the Oberth affect. Look it up.

  14. Re:Not Verified At All on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    I have read the paper, have you? Also i have read many many 100s of other papers that show momentum and energy are very very conserved. But hay i am sure some random guy on the internet clearly know more about physics than a MSc in physics. Or perhaps you just think its all one big conspiracy theory.

  15. Re:It's not silly. on Why Automation Won't Displace Human Workers (diginomica.com) · · Score: 1

    many or at least in my country most are owner operators. They will get far more time off is what will happen, while their business literately keeps on trucking.

    We no long need millions of people toiling in the fields to make food. And most of that shift has happened since the last war. It is really the same shit different day.

  16. Re: Finally on Why Automation Won't Displace Human Workers (diginomica.com) · · Score: 1

    That is what every said the last 3 times!

  17. Re:Any idea how it works? on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    If you find the time to read the paper you will be even more convinced how this is not a thing. Not even a proper control.

  18. Re:Read the Paper on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Also no zero thrust cavity for a proper control. Turning the thing around doesn't count as a proper control.

  19. Re:If confirmed, does this make it realistic? on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Calculate how much energy you need for a given reaction force for a given reaction medium velocity you ignorant cretin. You willfully ignorant of even basic highschool physics people piss me off. Your willfully ignorant.

    Kinetic energy goes with v^2, momentum or reaction with v. The faster moving the reaction stream is that you need to accelerate, the more energy you need for a given reaction. You didn't even try!

  20. Re:If confirmed, does this make it realistic? on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    It is called RELATIVITY. There is always some inertial frame of reference that is is moving fast enough to be an over unity device. Or are you suggesting that 1000s of experiments in relativity are all wrong, that all those measurements are wrong. That the 1000s of papers and scientist that work on that are wrong.

    But these 6 guys and this one sloppy paper is the one that got it all right.. Right? Fucking sci fi science dumb shits.

  21. Re:If confirmed, does this make it realistic? on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes you are. He showed you the math where this would create energy from nothing. You fucking ignored it.

  22. Re:If confirmed, does this make it realistic? on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Top scientists think its bullshit. They aren't wasting their time on technobabble physics.

  23. Re:If confirmed, does this make it realistic? on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    You may want to read the paper. It is open access. It is also rather disappointing. Sloppy with no control. And i haven't even gone through it in detail yet.

    Yea physics as we know it is quite safe for now.

  24. Re:Not Verified At All on Final NASA Eagleworks Paper Confirms Promising EM Drive Results (hacked.com) · · Score: 1

    Power over time is fucking energy. If i have a reactionless drive, there is ALWAYS some velocity that give me an over unity device. ALWAYS.

    dE/dt=power or P .. if P out is more than P in its an over unity device. And knee jerk Power not energy only shows how fucking dumb you are.

    P out = velocity*force, and you may then ask an even dumber question on why is that true. Well the very definitions tell you. Work or energy is Force over distance. Velocity is distance per unit time. Power is Work per unit time.

    Since P_{out}=v*F, if F has not extra energy component, like say all the kinetic energy in the reaction mass, then i just go fast enough an i have a perpetual motion. I get free energy. Also the laws of physics are technically different in different places and times.

    /. As dumb as the rest of the fucking internet.