I sit in front of a computer pretty much from the moment I wake up to the moment I go back to bed and I've been wearing progressive lenses for about a year now. The correct for both close up and distance.
At first it was a major hassle as I found myself moving my head more and actively trying to find the correct 'sweet spot' for whatever I was looking at.
I really don't have a problem with them now, I thnk it took about a month for me not to notice the additional head movement.
It might be worth going back to your optometrist and check your glasses have been ground correctly - an eye test with your glasses on should suffice. Mistakes are not common but the can occur
Sorry but that's mostly rubbish. It's a tactical thing that has more to do with intercepting the Soviet Arctic Fleet and its submersibles, before it can get in the Atlantic as well as what the other replies have stated
That's very naive. What it means is that Google collects more private data, meta data they can cross reference to target ads and still hand it over to the NSA upon request.
While it's quite possible to 'create' and do 'useful work' on a tablet it certainly seems more geared towards consumption. What Microsoft hasn't understood is that people use their software because they have to at work.
Office is not compelling. IE is not compelling. This is Microsofts attempt to move their monopoly to a new computing sector. It won't work. People don't want to use their software.
In the same way a beta tester does (among other things). Every time I do 'X' then 'Z' will happen instead of 'Y'. Please fix.
Recreating a repeatable problem is a pretty good start. In my experience the hardest part seems to be getting the average user to explain what the problem in a way that can be understood that is beyond 'it just doesn't work'
What do you suggest as a credible source then?
You loose your credibility by not stating one.
But did you do it "on a computer"?
Thought not.
That's totally different you see.
Interesting, I'm using a Mac and I see and Ad for Azure and another for Catchpoint. Maybe because I'm in the UK
This is from about a month ago
http://www.thenation.com/artic...
He has been and always will be our friend
I sit in front of a computer pretty much from the moment I wake up to the moment I go back to bed and I've been wearing progressive lenses for about a year now. The correct for both close up and distance.
At first it was a major hassle as I found myself moving my head more and actively trying to find the correct 'sweet spot' for whatever I was looking at.
I really don't have a problem with them now, I thnk it took about a month for me not to notice the additional head movement.
It might be worth going back to your optometrist and check your glasses have been ground correctly - an eye test with your glasses on should suffice. Mistakes are not common but the can occur
Its a PR amove to appease the local population after their recent protests.
http://www.theverge.com/2014/6...
Look at it from the bright side, at least it wasn't called Windows One.
One Zero.
That's what it is
Here's an interesting follow up from Ars
http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
Sorry but that's mostly rubbish. It's a tactical thing that has more to do with intercepting the Soviet Arctic Fleet and its submersibles, before it can get in the Atlantic as well as what the other replies have stated
If there's no highs an lows, it's gotta be Bose...
If there's no mids and tweets, it gotta be Beats!
Bollocks
A way of connecting to the Internet where there are no telephone lines or coaxial cables or even electricity.
What the hell is going to power the phones then? I think someone may be getting a little carried away with themselves
mag 5 is a nothing quake. california really needs to get over itself
I think the problem is that California is getting under itself
That's very naive. What it means is that Google collects more private data, meta data they can cross reference to target ads and still hand it over to the NSA upon request.
You know they're just gonna roll it into G+ don't you?
That's how they'll try and monetize it
Not until they have moved their proprietary software to another platform...
It sounds rather a lot like an Access Control List to me. I fail to see what's new about it
It'll be interesting how this works out. Normally when I'm in Richmond, I'm off my face and can't find my wallet
why buy waze then for a god awful amount of money if it's not for a product they sell?
To stop another company acquiring it? Shrewd move
While it's quite possible to 'create' and do 'useful work' on a tablet it certainly seems more geared towards consumption. What Microsoft hasn't understood is that people use their software because they have to at work.
Office is not compelling. IE is not compelling. This is Microsofts attempt to move their monopoly to a new computing sector. It won't work. People don't want to use their software.
How is a USER supposed to track down a bug?
In the same way a beta tester does (among other things). Every time I do 'X' then 'Z' will happen instead of 'Y'. Please fix.
Recreating a repeatable problem is a pretty good start. In my experience the hardest part seems to be getting the average user to explain what the problem in a way that can be understood that is beyond 'it just doesn't work'
Well, the advertisers could market their own browser that explicitly tracks and will not block ads.
How well do you think that would do Mr Advertiser?
Just what I thought.
I was lucky enough to meet him a couple of times at readings in the UK. I still think Walking on Glass is my fave.
Take it easy wherever you are
Patented in Australia 2001
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn965-wheel-patented-in-australia.html