Iain Banks Dies of Cancer At 59
An anonymous reader writes "BBC News is reporting that Iain Banks, best known for his Culture series novels and The Wasp Factory, has died of cancer aged 59. It had been announced several months ago that he was suffering from bladder cancer, and he had stated his intentions to spend his remaining time visiting places which meant a lot to him after marrying his partner."
Cancer sucks...
Oh bugger.
Thank you for giving me a universe that will live in my mind long after your death. You have uploaded your mindstate to me and many others.
In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
I just bought a couple of his books last week, knowing he wouldn't be around much longer. I haven't had time to fully read them yet (I'm maybe a hundred and fifty pages into Consider Phlebas) but from what I've read so far, the world is now a poorer place for having lost Mr. Banks.
Farewell Sun-Earther Iain El-Bonko Banks of North Queensferry; that's the Culture style name he gave himself once. I don't think there will ever be a fictional place that I wanted to live in as much as your Culture.
I encountered him a few times at Edinburgh Book Festival events and other signings. It was handy being able to say "Make it to Iain, spelled the same way".
When the Lazy Gun is fired at humans, many different things may occur. An anchor may appear above the person, giant electrodes may appear on either side of the target and electrocute them, or an animal may tear their throat out. Larger targets such as tanks or ships may suffer tidal waves, implosion, explosion, sudden lava flows or just disappear. When fired at cities and other such targets, thermonuclear explosions are the norm, although in one instance a comet crashed into the city.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_a_Dark_Background
Another interesting fact about a Lazy Gun is that it weighs three times as much when turned upside down.
I have been a programmer for about 10 years but I got tired of not really making any kind of a difference with programming. I decided to go back to school to do chemical and biological engineering so I could work on turning new nanotech/biotech treatments for various diseases like cancer into actual shipping products. There are been some lab bench cancer treatments that show 99%+ eradication of cancer within a few days of treatment but apparently it takes several people a year to make one dose. It is just not industrial scale stuff yet.
About a month after I decided to go back to school I found out that my business partner had pancreatic cancer and he died not too long after I started classes. I now have one year left and when I graduate I will hopefully get a job working on turning these cures into real shipping products. I know I may need to move to places like Canada or a western European country to work on real cures since the current profit motive in the USA does not really favor cures.
I just find it sad that this kind of thing continues to happen. We spend so much money and effort on killing people but if we spent even 5% of what we spent on the military we could cure a heck of a lot of these problems.
It is very sad that he died but it does provide yet another piece of incentive for what I will be doing next and I hope it will encourage other people to do the same.
Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD!
If you ever had cancer yourself you would not make unfunny, insensitive comments..
Why is it insensitive? Because it makes YOU uncomfortable or because you think that's what you're supposed to say? Get a grip. EVERYONE gets sick and dies so grow up and accept it.
And that is one of the WORST attitude to have around folks who are terminal.
Here's a complaint I hear all too often from the folks who are actually suffering from cancer: when someone is dieing, folks are solemn, sad, and afraid to "offend" - which brings down the mood of the cancer sufferer. Regardless if there's any truth to having a "positive" attitude helping one's recovery, joking about it DOES at least make life a little more bearable for the cancer patient.
I have a father striken and he needs a laugh every Goddamn time he can get it! And when folks are so serious around him; it makes HIM feel bad - the LAST thing he needs.
There are of course limts and depends on the person - obviously. I have also been around folks who joked about their prosthetic and sometimes had fun freaking kids out.
Cancer makes people very depressed. Actually the thought of dieing makes most people on our culture depressed and uneasy. We are a death phobic society and it's actually irrational. We WILL die - all of us.
tl;dr - Laughing at Death is the best revenge.
I wish you were fully backed up. I hope you Sublimed somehow.
I really like his novels, I see him in the lienage of Clarke and Herbert in his own Galaxy.
I loved his Culture books.
What a shame he wasn't backed up like his characters...
Iain M. Banks not only managed to revive SF to a point of being relevant once again (to me at least), he also managed to make up a future and a culture that was worth it. He may be dead now but he left something really precious: A possible world that is both interesting and (mostly) peaceful and fun.
I'm really thankful for that.
I wish that a passing GCU was able to complete a mind-state backup in time.
On our primitive planet with its petty preoccupations over power and money, you showed us a vision of the future in which Mankind has managed to transcend the narrow blinkers of its youth, and reaches out to the stars without material greed nor lust for power.
The Culture gave millions of us hope for the future, at a time when government, business and fanaticism seem intent on moving us back towards the barbarism of earlier ages. Your vision will live on in our hearts, come what may.
Thank you.
"The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
I've read almost every thing by him, the culture books make for great reading, complete with chatty star ship Minds. Also loved some of his non sf book, like complicity and Espida (sp?) Street. Yes his book where somewhat dark particularly many of the ending, but also refreshing in parts. He will be missed.I've read almost every thing by him, the culture books make for great reading, complete with chatty star ship Minds. Also loved some of his non sf book, like complicity and Espida (sp?) Street. Yes his book where somewhat dark particularly many of the ending, but also refreshing in parts. He will be missed.
Very, very sad news, he was probably my favorite scifi author..I hoped he'd manage to see his latest book The Quarry get released before he died, he even worked with his publisher to hasten the release for this summer and now this...fuck
Not sure if troll, or just 'murican, but I'll bite : your "American icon" was scottish to the bone (you know, the REAL kind, as in born there ;) :(
Anyway, R.I.P. Iain (M) Banks. Like many others, I was looking forward to new Culture books
In the announcement he did abot the cancer there was something about one more book from the Culture, are there any news about it?
Are you trying to be funny? He was Scottish and died in Scotland. A prominent advocate for the independence of his Scotland! He was not American in any way.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/jun/09/iain-banks-dies-59-cancer
Oregon writer Jay Lake is planning JayWake and his last JayCon; front page story in the E section of the Portland Oregonian http://oregonlive.com/ today (Sunday 2103-06-09) discussing the genetic testing he did after his stage four diagnosis. I'm storing the coffin for the pre-mortem wake in my garage (bought it off Craigslist, of course; where else would you get a slightly used coffin?) http://www.jlake.com/jaywake
There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
I've read almost all of his Culture work, and a couple of his mainstream books (Complicity was fun). A great loss, he will be missed.
"The slave who knows his master's will and does not get ready...will be be beaten with many blows."Luke 12:47-48
You're obviously hopelessly USian. In most of the English-speaking world, "partner" in this context does not mean "homosexual partner" although it can. It just means that the two people are a couple but are not married. To my knowledge, Iain Banks partner was, in fact, a woman.
that's one less faggot in the world. i hope his partner is denied any and all death benefits. bladder cancer my ass. he died from sucking one too many cocks.
Funny how you start your homophobic rant by quoting a rock song written and sung by a queer, then you assume that someone referring to Mr. Banks' spouse as his "partner" implies a same-sex relationship. In fact, his partner is a woman, you ignorant piece of maggot slime. Fuck you, hater. I know, I know... YHBT YHL etc.
I'm just going to repeat myself as I've already written this in response to someone else:
You're obviously hopelessly USian. In most of the English-speaking world, "partner" in this context does not mean "homosexual partner" although it can. It just means that the two people are a couple but are not married. To my knowledge, Iain Banks partner was, in fact, a woman.
RIP Iain M. Banks.
What I found so intriguing about his work is how he took the time to explain how certain significant scientific advancements result in their ultimate effect on economics, psychology, and the human view on the world/universe. A harmony of ideas surrounded by a solid mythology.
-Tim
You're obviously hopelessly USian. In most of the English-speaking world, "partner" in this context does not mean "homosexual partner" although it can. It just means that the two people are a couple but are not married. To my knowledge, Iain Banks partner was, in fact, a woman.
"Shortly after the announcement, Banks married his partner, Adele Hartley, and she survives him." (source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/jun/09/iain-banks-dies-59-cancer )
(And yes - those sort of comments reminded me of the folks who sprayed the word "paedo" on a house belonging to a paediatrician.)
I really like how in his Culture sex-changes are not only possible but common, with the usual course changing between the sexes one or more times and bearing a child being something even most men do at least once. But then, with at least 400 years at your disposal exploring how it is being a man/woman is something even the most extreme homophobes would try sooner or later... Ranting gets boring after one or two hundred years I guess.
Anyway, if you're a tight-minded human the Culture will induce rages for you, no doubt. They have no problems with drugs too, with all those drug glands engineered in. It's the most liberal, anarchistic (and stinking rich and powerful to the point of godlikeness) society you can think of. Or better, even in ways you probably even couldn't think of, this kind of super-power imagination is one of Bank's many merits.
I'm just one more to say how saddened I am for the loss of Iain Banks. His novels have touched me as well, and I have not felt the loss of any author as painful since Isaac Asimov passed.
AlthoughI fear otherwise, I sincerely hope that some day our children's children will live in something like the culture.
blindly antisocialist = antisocial
he's away the crow road. I once had the pleasure of meeting Iain and talking with him for a while, although I didn't realise at the time it was Iain Banks I was talking to. He was a lovely man who had his head screwed on well. He'll be missed.
Goddamn uncaring universe >:-(
If only the credulous assholes were right.
It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
With his Culture novels, Iain M Banks is unparalleled in sheer mind-blowing scope and depth. Many of the stories have a strong bitter-sweet quality (such as Consider Phlebas, the first one I read and still one of my favourites), the exception is possibly Player of Games which is a lot more cheerful. Excession is one of very few stories that extrapolate technology in a significant way. Use of Weapons is one of the most horrible stories I've ever read, with it's masterful exploration of the depths of the human psyche. Thank you Iain for the many wonderful, sad, funny, mind-boggling moments I've had reading your books, and may generations of people enjoy the same experience!
Exactly. The term "girlfriend" suggests a lack of maturity (either in the person or in the relationship), "lover" suggests a clandestine arrangement and "fuckbuddy" suggests a lack of emotional attachment (additionally, in most circles, use of the term is frowned upon). "Partner" is the only word I can think of which conveys a relationship with the maturity and completeness of a marriage without actually being a marriage.
Ahh - My eye!
The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
You're obviously hopelessly USian.
No, they're obviously a troll. That's all there is to it.
Too late for Iain though, sadly (vitamin d, iodine, phytonutrients, etc.): http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3610805&cid=43349347
Also google on cancer and a ketogenic diet (starves cancer cells of the sugar they need).
The sad thing is we could have a post-scarcity society right now, but our ideology gets in the way. Maybe it would not be "The Culture" level, but it would still be pretty neat. But we have not done that, and so many areas of our society, including medicine. remain backward for lack of appropriate investment.
Good luck on your career. Maybe there will be some magic bullets out there to fight cancer someday, maybe you will invent them, but until then, there is still a lot a person can do to prevent and in some cases reverse cancer, even if nothing is 100% guaranteed.
Sadly, we also lost another post-scarcity sci-fi writer, James P. Hogan, a couple years ago to heart disease (a disease generally reversible with excellent nutrition).
http://www.jamesphogan.com/books/info.php?titleID=29&cmd=summary
A book James P. Hogan told me about:
http://disciplinedminds.tripod.com/
"Who are you going to be? That is the question.
In this riveting book about the world of professional work, Jeff Schmidt demonstrates that the workplace is a battleground for the very identity of the individual, as is graduate school, where professionals are trained. He shows that professional work is inherently political, and that professionals are hired to subordinate their own vision and maintain strict "ideological discipline."
The hidden root of much career dissatisfaction, argues Schmidt, is the professional's lack of control over the political component of his or her creative work. Many professionals set out to make a contribution to society and add meaning to their lives. Yet our system of professional education and employment abusively inculcates an acceptance of politically subordinate roles in which professionals typically do not make a significant difference, undermining the creative potential of individuals, organizations and even democracy.
Schmidt details the battle one must fight to be an independent thinker and to pursue one's own social vision in today's corporate society. He shows how an honest reassessment of what it really means to be a professional employee can be remarkably liberating. After reading this brutally frank book, no one who works for a living will ever think the same way about his or her job."
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
His writings help inspire the OSCOMAK idea by me starting about twenty five years ago, but it hasn't gone much anywhere: http://www.kurtz-fernhout.com/oscomak/
So, I know what you mean by these sorts of inspirations. A good sci-fi author helps us make a leap of imagination.
I'd recommend Hogan's "The Two Faces of Tomorrow" and his "Voyage From Yesteryear" especially for post-scarcity themes. But he touches on them in his other works too. Also check out his "Code of the Lifemaker" if you like the idea of seed factories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_the_Lifemaker
So, if you like Iain Banks, you may like Hogan's writing. Sadly, James P Hogan died about three years ago of heart disease (which is generally reversible through great nutrition, see Dr. Joel Fuhrman).
Cool stuff that on Seed Factories. Check out the "Open Manufacturing" mailing list though for other people with related interests.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/openmanufacturing
A key point I've discovered on post-scarcity perceptions and social choices (summarized in my sig):
http://www.pdfernhout.net/recognizing-irony-is-a-key-to-transcending-militarism.html
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
They either appreciate the joking and it may actually help, unlike being glum about them which will MOST CERTAINLY cause them harm.
Same goes with pissing them off.
OR... They are so far gone psychologically that it doesn't matter if you are joking or crying while sitting on top of their head.
So, where's the harm? You either can't make things worse, or there's a chance or making things better.
Oh, right! Now I remember!
It's NOT about the person with cancer - it's about US being seen as someone who "grieves with them in this final moment" and not as an "insensitive jerk making fun of the poor, poor walking dead man".
Pretenses! Right! I keep forgetting that. Silly me.
What can I say... It must be cause it feels kinda selfish and hypocritical to impose the idea on someone that they are already dead, while they are still very much alive - just so I could fit in better with what I think society expects of me, and thus feel good about myself.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
I don't find Hogan's prose particularly impressive. I read The Proteus Operation and found it only barely worth reading. I don't find any similarities between the two writers. Well, other than they are now both dead.
All of the great SciFi novelists seem to be dropping like flies and I don't think there is anyone to replace them. I don't think writing novels is something that the Facebook Generation really yearns to do. At least Neal Stephenson is still alive. And Joe Haldeman. But I wonder for how long. Surely their days are numbered.
Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
One of he best sci authors I have read. Hope he gets to "sublime"
Iain Banks is dead. Let us all get Alsations drunk, and meet on the corner of Espedair Street.
Whoever added the tag "neverheardofhim", shame on you. Do you always parade your ignorance in public? It's not a virtue you know! Either look him up and educate yourself or just ignore the story if you're determined to be a prat.
He should have had another 20 years of writing novels.
This is a really sad loss, way before his time. ;-(
Sad too because we are so close to realising some of the things we wrote about.
but too long.
PKD he was not.
The Proteus operation is not one of Hogan's better works. If you are willing to give him another try, try Voyage from Yesteryear, The Two Faces of Tomorrow, or Code of the Lifemaker, which are all about post-scarcity technologies in various ways as hard sci-fi. It is the post-scarcity aspects that are similar, even if Hogan's are much more near-term.
The thing about writers is, it may take decades for people to learn about the prose that stands the test of time. So, I guess most authors may be old by the time that happens.
An on-line page turner for me by Roger Williams, even if too graphically violent:
http://localroger.com/prime-intellect/
Bound to be other great voices out there.
I like some of Peter F. Hamilton's stuff, although again it is too graphically violent for my tastes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Reality_Dysfunction
I really like Bruce Sterling's "Schismatrix":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schismatrix
I read somewhere that modern sci-fi is so hard to write because it gets boring because things are so safe (or just crazy -- e.g. anything goes nanotech). Larry Niven faced that and supposedly threw away a lot of his stories about the "Teela" gene time of lucky people who won a birth lottery, because they were too boring. Space exploration to other planets like Star Trek linked to what people knew of exploring new continents and islands on Earth. What can really connect to what people know when talking about deeply different virtual reality and nanotech and robotics? It's probably pretty hard to write a story interesting to humans.
Even Iain Banks struggled with that, having to write stories in ages when the human form was popular in the Culture (he says sometimes it was not popular) and writing about "Special Circumstances" having adventures on non-Culture worlds.
I've pretty much stopped buying sci-fi novel though (compared to buying one or two dozen a year a couple decades ago). The current ongoing changes are pretty much too exciting as they are. :-) Hard to recall the last new novel I've bought, although I've reread some old ones...
Sarah Zettel is an interesting author (blending Islamic ideas with science fiction themes, example, a woman starship captain who wears a burka and goes through all sorts of hoops to keep correct by the law -- the core theme of the book is about AI though):
http://www.amazon.com/Fools-War-Sarah-Zettel/dp/0446602930
Baen might have younger novelists somewhere?
http://www.baen.com/
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
A good writer (and I hear he was a good person as well but I did not know him). My sympathies to his family.
J.
The difference is that what you said isn't at all witty.
Raw Spirit is Iain's romp across Scotland in search of the "perfect dram" of Scotch whisky. Fun read, and worth it for the pronunciation guide at the back (don't assume you know how to pronounce "Bowmore")...
hahaha dumb ass got cancer and died, this is some funny shit!!!
Ladyfriend?, sweetheart? Common law spouse? Love?
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
Ladyfriend is still too similar to girlfriend. It has this euphemistic feel to it, as if you might say it in a whisper with a wink and nudge. Sweetheart is a little too saccharine and is more of a term of endearment. Common law spouse has too precise a definition and, aside from probably being irrelevant in most circumstances, probably isn't accurate. Love could possibly work, but has a broader definition (at least, in the area of romance).
Partner is nicely descriptive. It's still not perfect, obviously. Romantic partner has to be taken by implication and context. You could, for example, misinterpret it to business partner. Since he's an author, maybe a co-author or an editor.
Your remark is insensitive. If you expect respect for your religious views, then I expect you to respect that Mr Banks was well-known for being an atheist.
Now go away, please.
Ladyfriend is still too similar to girlfriend. It has this euphemistic feel to it, as if you might say it in a whisper with a wink and nudge.
Euphemism is appropriate if he's having a "relationship with the maturity and completeness of a marriage without actually being a marriage".
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
But the connotations of "ladyfriend" seem to belong to a time and place where such a relationship is at least a little beyond the pale. "Partner" seems to belong to a mature society that accepts that the relationship belongs to the people involved in it. Also, it doesn't require distinguishing between "ladyfriend" or "manfriend". Come to think of it, I'm not sure I've ever really heard "manfriend" used, so there's a bit of a balance problem with "ladyfriend" as well.